In Scotland they say:
Never marry for money. It's cheaper to borrow.
John
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 03:40:38 +0100, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message - From: Kenneth Waller Subject: Re: Enough
Already!
Shame I was born handsome instead of rich! ;-)
You
Thanks, Igor.
John
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 03:39:20 +0100, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would second that.
I've printed some photos on HP 2550n on a letter size, and
it looks much better then home-quality el-cheapo inkjet printers.
The print quality is not as good as professional
Although I don't find this picture as attractive to look at as some of
your more colourful Monument Valley shots, it certainly works as intended
in so far as you have made effective use of the haze.
John
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:48:42 +0100, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is
I like it, too. It almost lokks as though you set it up, but I'm sure you
didn't!
John
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 00:02:15 +0100, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was taken at the Beaches Jazz Festival last weekend. I normally
wouldn't shoot people at a restaurant (unless I knew
Lovely colours, and great texture.
John
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 06:14:40 +0100, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Quoting Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Brian, isn't a gum tree also known as eucalyptus?
True - although to be botanically pedantic, gum trees comprise three
genera
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 14:02:18 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone about for a stroll down the river one evening during the week
beginning August 15th? Boris is over from Israel for the week
sightseeing and I've promised my lad a trip to the Chelsea FC shop, so a
little photography
Sounds good. Monday or Wednesday would work well for me. Tuesday and
Thursday I might be able to join you later.
John
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 14:02:18 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone about for a stroll down the river one evening during the week
beginning August 15th? Boris is
These printers are getting cheaper and cheaper. How does the quality
compare with a good inkjet (for printing photos)?
Are they worth considering, or do they have a long way to go?
John
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Shel,
I may have said this before, but in my view you are a far better colour
photographer than you think you are.
John
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:08:04 +0100, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/ji-20.html
Taken late one afternoon during a stroll
Great shot.
John
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 16:26:39 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmm. About six images behind according to my calendar. Better start
hopping to it... :-)
This one from Plymouth, England ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/25.htm
As usual,
and prints with no
problems.
Leon
http://www.bluering.org.au
http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
John Forbes wrote:
These printers are getting cheaper and cheaper. How does the quality
compare with a good inkjet (for printing photos)?
Are they worth considering, or do they have a long
The Midwich Cuckoos come to mind.
John
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 21:26:01 +0100, keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pancho Hasselbach wrote:
Shel,
what I find most scaring are the eyes. It is not normal to look like
this, either it's excessive training, or the girls took some pills...
The way
My favourite, too, Gianco. Lovely shot.
John
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 23:09:35 +0100, Gianfranco Irlanda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tango! by Gianfranco Irlanda is my favorite.
Hi Shel,
Thanks a LOT!!!
I'm very happy you liked it.
Ciao,
Gianfranco
Lovely. An automotive rainbow.
John
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:31:16 +0100, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I mentioned yesterday that I was going to shoot the 50th anniversary
tri-five (55-57) Chevy show at Milford, Michigan. This isn't really a
car pic, but I like it. Perhaps
You've got some great shots from that trip, Bruce. Keep 'em coming.
John
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 05:57:39 +0100, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is another not so common site in Monument Valley. From my
recollection, this area had a whole bunch of rocks fall down. So
there is
Herb,
Whilst a lot of what you say makes sense from a marketing perspective,
your financial analysis is much less convincing.
I have a small client with branches around the UK. The smallest branch,
in Scotland, lost £30,000 last year. (Not big money, but it's the
principle that
Paul,
The various interesting properties that you might want to visit are owned
by a variety of different organisations. Grand country houses in England
are often the property of the National Trust, but not invariably. Many of
the most important buildings in Britain are government-owned
Facts? Herb selects only the facts that suit his thesis, so the effect is
just as misleading as if he made them all up.
Personally I'm sick to death of the way he scavenges like a vulture for
bad news about Pentax, and takes great delight in presenting it like some
necrophiliac who's just
I'm for No 2, too. I like the way that there appears to be a succession
of simialr outcrops, standing guard over something to the left.
John
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:22:25 +0100, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
#2 gets my vote. The framing with the overhanging
branch in #1 doesn't
It has a certain callipygian charm!
John
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:38:43 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thank you all for your comments on #23.
Here's what I think might be one of my better hip shots ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/24.htm
comments,
I was in my local camera shop recently, and they said they were now
handling 50% more film dp as they were five years ago.
Sounded impressive, until I remembered that five years ago we had four
camera shops within a mile or so. Now we have one.
Statistics always need interpretation.
John
I don't know. The odd flame war once every two or three months makes for
amusement. As long as it doesn't get out of hand, and in the last six
months I'd say that well over 90% of posts have been fine, if not always
precisely on topic.
The problem is usually one individual who comes,
In his enthusiasm to knock Pentax, Herb tends to glide over minor
obstacles such as facts.
John
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 02:25:33 +0100, P. J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Funny, I thought Pentax was a closely held corporation, there's usually
no market for that kind of stock since no
I've bought over a hundred items on Ebay, and had problems with about
five. In every case, a polite email pointing out the problem resulted in
a satisfactory outcome - a replacement, a discount, or in one case the
item returned with a refund of all costs plus shipping both ways (that
Wiggers, Ebay is not equivalent to a livestock auction. In the latter,
you bid solely on the appearance of the animal. The seller does not say:
This heifer will deliver 50 gallons of milk a day, guaranteed. If he
did, and it didn't, you would certainly have a legal basis for a refund.
I agree. Original, and very well executed.
John
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:13:32 +0100, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Alan P. Hayes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan P. Hayes
Meaning and Form: Writing, Editing and Document Design
Pittsfield, Massachusetts
Photographs at
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:37:33 +0100, Wigwam Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Opinions wanted, ebay item condition
Sent: 15 Jun 2005 14:57:56
Wiggers, Ebay is not equivalent to a livestock auction.
Yes, it is. Cameras don't go moo
00:08:17 +0100, Wigwam Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
Do read what I said. I said that in a livestock auction you generally
look at the animal and bid. The sellers seldom make claims about the
animal's capabilities. In an Ebay auction, they do, and nothing
exempts
[Original Message]
From: John Forbes
As William said, why put a filter on a lens if you don't have to?
- Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: *ist D discontinued ?
Why would you want ISO 50 sensitivity? At 200, noise is virtually
unnoticable, and ND filters can be used when
On a whim, I bid on one of these on Ebay, and won. I already have an F
70-210, so it was somewhat unnecessary, but I wanted to see whether the
VS1 lenses are as wonderful as they are claimed to be.
The lens was described as being in mint condition, and, guess what, it
was.
However, this
Thanks, Joe,
Mine is a Komine too, which seems to be the best. Serial number
28504851. Strange that they should be different.
The aperture question now seems more of a mystery.
But whatever, all in all, a very nice surprise to get something that
exceeds expectations.
John
On Tue, 14
to remove the lens.
Filing the P pin off solves this problem.
Don
-Original Message-
From: John Forbes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 5:26 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Vivitar S1 70-210 F2.8-4 question
On a whim, I bid on one of these on Ebay, and won. I
problem, and in fact, there
doesn't seem to be one. However, I might take off the mount and remove
the pin just to be safe.
John
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:47:05 +0100, Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, John Forbes wrote:
The aperture question now seems more
Given what I've heard on this subject recently, you are no doubt correct.
Perhaps I need to take apart the flash units and introduce a bit more
resistance, or do I mean impedance?
John
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:43:23 +0100, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John Forbes [EMAIL
As William said, why put a filter on a lens if you don't have to? I shoot
quite a lot indoors with flash, and usually find I have too much light. I
suppose putting ND filters over the flash heads might be another solution,
but the best would be 50 ISO on the camera.
John
On Sun, 12 Jun
would be an improvement. As I've said
about film,
SB lower speeds means wider apertures and more creative opportunities.
SB Shel
[Original Message]
From: John Forbes
As William said, why put a filter on a lens if you don't have to?
- Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist
Subject
They're still being advertised here:
http://www.parkcameras.com/
I bought a second body from them a couple of months ago.
John
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:10:55 +0100, Robert Whitehouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my *ist post (sorry !) to this group so apologies if this is an
old
Good question.
For the average PDMLer the D is the best camera of the three. The only
worthwhile improvement offered by the DS is it's larger buffer/higher
speed, but against those is the lack of functionality and the irritation
of idiot features like sports mode.
Perhaps Pentax are no
I don't think the *ist DSLRs will share production lines with the D645.
Insufficient differentiation within the *ist range is the reason to cut
one model. Let's hope it's not too long before they bring out the D Mk2.
John
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:49:42 +0100, P. J. Alling
[EMAIL
Beautiful.
John
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:52:18 +0100, Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wonderful tonalities, Shel - excellent shot, very well printed (or
scanned)
- MCC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - -
Nice picture, Mark. I remember the days when North Wales was dry on a
Sunday, and half the population spent the day in chapel and the other half
over the border in a temple of a different sort. There was a pub near
Chirk where half the bar was in England and half in Wales. You could only
I've never found a use for more than one focus point.
John
On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 17:30:21 +0100, Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Hence, along the crippled KAF mount, now we also have a crippled SAFOX
VIII.
It's great to be in Pentaxdom :-(
They're not phasing out
Herb,
I think you'll find that the prices of sensors, like the prices of several
other things, are quite closely related to volume. I don't recall anybody
suggesting that Leica is a high volume camera maker. A manufacturer who
was able to commit to rather higher volumes than Leica would
Many people find it hard to distinguish between a zoom lens and a
telescopic lens. :-)
One Ebay hopeful was offering a 135mm wide-angle last week. And, yes, the
picture showed a genuine 135mm, not a 35mm.
John
On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 23:27:00 +0100, John Dallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He's also now clarified that it's really a 135mm, not a 120mm.
John
On Sun, 29 May 2005 20:27:00 +0100, John Dallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Collin R Brendemuehl) wrote:
How would you rate it in overall edge sharpness contrast matters?
Aesthetically and ergonomically, there is no contest. The Super A is a
little jewel. The SFx is a great lumbering dynosaur. But they're both
well-made and competent cameras.
John
On Tue, 31 May 2005 13:51:12 +0100, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW,
I have had the SFXn and it's a
in Foster's. In our
language we don't use apostrophs that way ever, exept after words ending
with s, like Forbes' .
sidewinderAnd of course we don't capitalise the names of languages.
Especially not Canadian./sidewinder
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message - From: John Forbes
I agree with Kostas that the SF.. bodies are much under-rated and
therefore very good value.
However (having just replaced my old Super A (Super Program) on Ebay for
next to nothing, for purely nostalgic reasons), I have to say that the
Super A is a superbly designed and beautifully small
: John Forbes Subject: Re: Looking
for a lense
abomination became known as the grocer's apostrophe.
grocers'?
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus
Of course the King James version! Is there any other? None in English,
of that I am certain. There are a number of failed attempts, but none
that are in any way readable. :-)
John
On Sat, 28 May 2005 00:39:42 +0100, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/27/05, Kostas
Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 28 May 2005, John Forbes wrote:
You haven't read your Bible, Kostas.
Gasp! 12 years at school, compulsory theology course. Only in a
different language :-)))
However, I am not sure the Bible is a good grammar companion; isn't it
full of thys, thines
Thank you, William. Interesting. There's no fender. Is it what you call
the quarter panel?
John
On Sat, 28 May 2005 01:40:44 +0100, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message - From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: Rumors About Pentax's Future
So what's a bumper
He likes to gloat about the demise of everything, except Canon.
I'm the opposite. :-)
John
On Sat, 28 May 2005 05:35:43 +0100, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Herb likes to gloat about the demise of film ;-)) He's a strong booster
of
The Digital Way.
Shel
[Original
On Sat, 28 May 2005 01:10:09 +0100, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message - From: John Forbes
Subject: FA 35mm versus 31mm Ltd
Does anyone have experience of both these lenses. I'm in the market
for an AF lens in this FL range, and, for reasons of lucre, am
Have a great trip. I've enjoyed the photos you've posted, and look
forward to more.
John
On Sat, 28 May 2005 00:48:33 +0100, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi PDML,
I'm leaving for Spain on Sunday, and will be there for two months. Not
too many plans, just to establish base in
Not his wife, unless she does the hiring. :-)
John
On Sat, 28 May 2005 05:42:59 +0100, P. J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I never thought of it that way. I'll mention it to the owner next time
I see him, or maybe his wife.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 5/25/2005
William, you are as ever the master of the pithy one-liner.
John
On Sat, 28 May 2005 01:56:04 +0100, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message - From: Bob Blakely Subject: Re:
Photography or/and art?
Sex is personal?
Only if you are ugly or smell bad.
Don't take me too seriously, Fred! (Note the smiley in my original
post.) Of course there are dozens of versions, and I've only thumbed
through a few of them. My point was that none of them (AFAIK) even
pretend to be good to read.
John
On Sat, 28 May 2005 14:35:43 +0100, Fred [EMAIL
Agreed. Krakow is lovely, on a smaller scale than Prague, and with much
less of the excellent 19th Century architecture that Prague has. The main
square in Krakow is much bigger and in many ways better than Prague's, but
Prague has more good buildings overall, and almost no bad (modern!)
I haven't seen it. Thanks for the suggestion; I'll keep my eyes peeled.
John
On Sat, 28 May 2005 13:34:07 +0100, E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
I would guess that 35mm bw will outlive anything else. The darkroom
process is something that many photographers don't want to give up, and
there may be enough of them to keep bw film alive almost indefinitely.
It is unlikely to be cost-effective to make colour film just for MF and LF
-Original Message-
From: John Forbes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 May, 2005 12:57 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: FA 35mm versus 31mm Ltd
Does anyone have experience of both these lenses. I'm in the
market for
an AF lens in this FL range, and, for reasons of lucre, am trying
, was suicidal because one the biggest customers was college
students. Apparently I was right about that because I notice the 25
sheet package of Tri-X is once again available.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
John Forbes wrote:
I
] wrote:
G'day John,
The odd word here and there but mostly we follow the British example.
Dave
On 5/29/05, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the world of Oz had adopted American spelling. The
Australian
Labor (sic) Party certainly has.
John
On Sat, 28 May 2005 19:07:00
One for the quote file. Or the rash predictions file.
Unless you mean that much production will be farmed out to just a handful
of manufacturers. That may happen, but I think many of the brands will
remain.
John
On Fri, 27 May 2005 02:24:21 +0100, Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got news for you, Greywolf. It still isn't standardised/standardized.
John
On Fri, 27 May 2005 02:38:19 +0100, Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think it is an British variant of lens. They often have a silent
e at the end of words, not having had Noah Webster to tell them how
I see no reason why they can't release an upgrade to the D with a bigger
buffer and compressed RAW files. And perhaps an improved door and better
back multi-function button. Incremental improvements to an existing model
are normal practice, and cost very little. Meanwhile they can work on
old fart mode on I have always considered it thus:
English is the language of England. The clue is in the name. English has
also for some time been the most popular language in the rest of the
British Isles. The language has been taken to other countries through the
vehicle of the
When I lived in Jamaica, the newspaper editors would have been horrified
at the suggestion that they were using any language other than the Queen's
English. I should imagine that the same holds true today. The language
used by educated Jamaicans contained one or two local words, but was
A West Indian Wrench is a hammer and a cold chisel.
John
(With apologies to West Indians, who always looked after my cars very well)
On Fri, 27 May 2005 19:34:25 +0100, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message - From: Butch Black
Subject: Re: Rumors About Pentax's
Species
See any good dictionary.
There is a word specie. It means coin, as opposed to paper, money
John
On Fri, 27 May 2005 23:18:57 +0100, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
old fart mode on I have always considered it thus:
English is the language of England
Does anyone have experience of both these lenses. I'm in the market for
an AF lens in this FL range, and, for reasons of lucre, am trying to
convince myself that the 35 is as good as the 31. Any thoughts?
John
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
--
No
You haven't read your Bible, Kostas.
Five loaves, and two small fishes. From the parable of feeding the five
thousand.
John
On Fri, 27 May 2005 23:48:09 +0100, Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2005, mike wilson wrote:
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Fri,
On Fri, 27 May 2005 23:51:07 +0100, keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I join the O.F. Brigade in July ;-)
Welcome aboard, sire.
John
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version:
So what's a bumper, then?
John
On Fri, 27 May 2005 23:55:01 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27/5/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
I thought a fender was a bumper.
But I could be wrong.
Naw.
A flat-fender Jeep has flat wheel arches at the front. Flat wings to you
It's reassuring to know that you have some behaviour to modify, or not.
My behaviour was so ill, it died.
John
On Fri, 27 May 2005 23:56:05 +0100, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/26/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not pointing any fingers I'm relating the
On Fri, 27 May 2005 23:43:34 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to say that I'm a bit of wine snob and rarely touch anything that
doesn't come from France, with 2 notable exceptions: rioja from Spain,
and a few dry whites from Italy.
I'm available for dinner invitations
John
It's easier. Not necessarily wiser, or better.
John
On Thu, 26 May 2005 16:21:57 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 5/26/2005 8:19:28 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I learnt early that it's wiser to paddle with the current than against.
Cheers,
Rob
So why don't you just go off and buy a bloody Canon and unsubscribe? This
is a Pentax list, but sometimes it reads like a piece of Canon Marketing
propaganda.
I've got two *ist D, and several superb lenses which can't be bettered by
Canon at any price. Using Ebay (which still exists, by
that grossly overused and abused cliche.
Tom C.
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: AW: AW: Rumors About Pentax's Future
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 23:34:50 +0100
So why don't you just go off and buy a bloody Canon
.
:-) )
John
On Thu, 26 May 2005 23:59:47 +0100, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 26 May 2005 at 23:34, John Forbes wrote:
So why don't you just go off and buy a bloody Canon and unsubscribe?
This is a
Pentax list, but sometimes it reads like a piece of Canon Marketing
propaganda
with the present situation in the market and our subsequent
perceptions. Pentax has deeper pockets than any of us individually, so
I'm loathe to throw money at a company that may not know where it's
going.
Tom C.
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax
Gaze deep, deep, into those peerless eyes.
John Keats
On Wed, 25 May 2005 23:29:51 +0100, P. J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometimes employee training gets completely out of hand
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_emptrain.html
Technical Data:
Pentax *ist-D iso-1600
I agree with Frank.
John
On Wed, 25 May 2005 04:03:21 +0100, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/23/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_tiftew.html
When I was re-taking Working Boat, I brought my el-cheapo Vermer
12mm. Here's
I agree with Frank. Really. Super shot.
John
On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:42:47 +0100, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/24/05, Cesar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A former lurker on this list stopped by the other day. She wants me to
shoot her wedding. She is intimately aware of my
Fortune favours the brave. Or so 'tis said.
John
On Fri, 27 May 2005 00:50:19 +0100, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 27 May 2005 at 0:45, John Forbes wrote:
I hope Pentax will survive as a quirky niche player offering petite,
highly ergonomic bodies and some superb lenses
Thanks, Cotters.
It's late now, but I'll try it tomorrow.
John
On Tue, 24 May 2005 09:41:03 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/5/05, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
There doesn't seem to be a way to get into this. What's the secret?
When
I request information on how
Thanks, Mark.
They are both superb. Love the colour.
John
On Tue, 24 May 2005 13:17:59 +0100, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent collection, Gianco. I especially like the one
called The Eye
Glad you said that. I couldn't work out how you got those numbers, but
didn't want to argue with a nuclear physicist!
John
On Tue, 24 May 2005 16:26:37 +0100, Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaagh!
I got some numbers wrong. :-(
See below.
Steve Jolly wrote:
Don
Mishka,
You've clearly never been to Texas. :-)
John
On Tue, 24 May 2005 00:13:41 +0100, Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why not move to texas?
mishka
On 5/23/05, Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
found that there are a lot of people in the world who feel their
mission in life is making
There doesn't seem to be a way to get into this. What's the secret? When
I request information on how to access a public folder, I am directed to
sign in!
John
On Tue, 24 May 2005 00:35:59 +0100, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 23 May 2005 at 19:07, Cotty wrote:
Hi Paul,
I've been away on a narrowboat for a week (pics to follow), so this is
rather a delayed reply.
I have to agree, Foyle's War is good. The length of the episodes allows
time for the story and characters to develop, and Michael Kitchen (Foyle)
is that rare beast on TV, an actor. His roles
I can confirm that the D was wearing the FA 20 2.8.
I was wearing the funny striped tee-shirt.
John
On Mon, 16 May 2005 14:42:55 +0100, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message - From: mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kostas (what lens is on the -D and what on the Z-1p?)
Excellent collection, Gianco. I especially like the one called The
Eye. I was looking for a good abstract composition involving the wheel,
but didn't find one.
John
On Tue, 17 May 2005 00:01:31 +0100, Gianfranco Irlanda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
Late, but not TOO late
That was a very comprehensive explanation, Godfrey. It needs to go on a
website somewhere for posterity. Perhaps Boz could add it to his.
John
On Fri, 13 May 2005 01:16:00 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, the manual is incorrect. A lenses work exactly the same as F/FA
no proof of this, I just heard it, and it kind of
makes sense.
Tom C.
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Digital camera sales in the USA
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 01:28:26 +0100
Sure, but these are still single entities
Collin,
For the edification of those less educated than yourself, could you please
explain how information can merit technical excellence?
Thank you.
On Thu, 12 May 2005 15:51:14 +0100, Collin Brendemuehl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fired?
I guess that destroys another theory to account for the
Is there such a thing as found art? Other than finding a piece of art
that was lost or at least unknown. Surely art requires the hand (and
brain) of man?
This was a found scene. The art lies in Peter's picture. Anyway, I think
so.
John
On Thu, 12 May 2005 14:20:30 +0100, frank
On Wed, 11 May 2005 22:13:30 +0100, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this one. Cool perspective and the two people hanging out down
there really add to it. Would love to see a good scan :).
Me, too. Nice.
John
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:
as facetious as I was, though I
can't be sure I don't speak for Frank.
John Forbes wrote:
It seems this little jest of mine has fallen rather flat. I apologise
to Frank, and hope he will accept my assurance that no harm was
intended.
The entry has been removed.
John
On Tue, 10 May 2005 14
1201 - 1300 of 1855 matches
Mail list logo
