2009/12/8 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
Unfortunately it seems that I have the choice of changing all of the files
to the same time, or by an integer number of hours, not tweaking the files
in one camera by five minutes so that a capture time sort works right.
Would it be an option to
Godfrey's right - I Just tried it - I selected two photos - edited the
capture time of the top one by clicking on the seconds and adding two,
clicked the change all button and the second photo had two seconds
added.
So it should be a matter of selecting all the shots from the camera
you want to
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:22 AM, Alastair Robertson wrote:
Godfrey's right - I Just tried it - I selected two photos - edited the
capture time of the top one by clicking on the seconds and adding two,
clicked the change all button and the second photo had two seconds
added.
So it should be a
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Thanks, that seems to have worked properly, once I did it in gallery mode.
Great! Glad to help.
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I was shooting with both bodies this weekend, particularly during
dance contests when I had the FA31 on one body and the 18-250 on the
other.
Unfortunately, the clocks in the two cameras were out of sync by 5
minutes, so sorting by capture time almost, but doesn't quite, work
right. I
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I was shooting with both bodies this weekend, particularly during dance
contests when I had the FA31 on one body and the 18-250 on the other.
Unfortunately, the clocks in the two cameras were out of sync by 5 minutes,
so
On Dec 7, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I was shooting with both bodies this weekend, particularly during
dance
contests when I had the FA31 on one body and the 18-250 on the other.
Unfortunately, the clocks in
On 12/10/09, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
If I can find a way for it to pay off, I'd love to.
You can start with a hat and some tap shoes - think outside the box ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
I don't think it's designed with that sort of approach in mind, and that's
not a way that I would recommend to anyone, but...
To use a laptop as the day-to-day working catalogue, with offline storage
say on a network drive or a separate external drive, I would probably be
thinking along these
Marnie,
The problem is not getting them into a lightroom collection.
The problem is what happens when I roll the calandar quarter's worth
of pictures off of the laptop.
I will lose access to all my favorites for that time period.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:43 PM,
In a message dated 10/12/2009 7:24:18 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
rf.sulli...@gmail.com writes:
Marnie,
The problem is not getting them into a lightroom collection.
The problem is what happens when I roll the calandar quarter's worth
of pictures off of the laptop.
I will lose access to all my
.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
Behalf Of Larry Colen
Sent: 11 October 2009 21:47
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lightroom question
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:49:54AM -0500, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Oct 11, 2009
I wish I could help, but I don't have time to write out what seems to
comprise about 70% of the nine-hour Lightroom workshop I teach. This
material ... image files in the file system and their relationship to
the Lightroom catalog ... seems to be the 95th percentile problem for
most people using
In a message dated 10/12/2009 2:32:23 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
p...@web-options.com writes:
I don't mean to sound rude, but if you don't even know whether you're
dealing with libraries or catalogues are you likely to understand any
answers you're given? You really need to learn more about
What sort of access do you want to those pictures, and when you say 'roll
the pictures off', what do you mean - are you moving them from the laptop's
internal disk to an external disk and also deleting them from the LR
catalogue, or are you keeping them in the catalogue?
When you import files
There's also online training at
http://www.kelbytraining.com/
They have 30+ teachers. Most of the course are on PS, but some are on
Lightroom. I am impressed they have a online course done by Katrin Eismann
Color to Black and White Artistry, but they seem to have some beginning and
Godfrey,
Been thinking about it. You gonna do a traveling show someday?
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
I wish I could help, but I don't have time to write out what seems to
comprise about 70% of the nine-hour Lightroom workshop I
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Godfrey,
Been thinking about it. You gonna do a traveling show someday?
If I can find a way for it to pay off, I'd love to.
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Bob,
I think you see the problem now...
My paradyme with Photoshop was to keep everything in one catalogue on
one machine. Then it changed to move old images off the laptop (or
desktop) to free up space for newer pictures. At first, this was easy
and I was able to create a Greatest Hits album
G,
My monthly Calumet Photo catalogue lists courses they are offering.
They sponsor seminars in their locations at an instore meeting room.
See on of their catalogues for seminars in NYC, Boston, Chicago, SF, LA, etc.
(You'll need to up your prices.)
See if you can make a connection out there and
So, copy everything to your backup. Select your 2009 images, then the
Keepers sub-set of images. Then flip the selection so now you have
in your selection all of those which are NOT Keepers. Delete them from
the HD from within LR. You are left with your Keepers still on your HD.
stan
On
: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: Lightroom question
Thanks Paul,
I'm looking for a good way to keep the shots or copies up on the
laptop after I roll the originals off the laptop and into back=up
understand you correctly. I don't know if that helps, but I gave it the
old one two. :-) Cheers, Christine
- Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: Lightroom
I've got a job Tuesday night taking photos at a charity event. As part
of this job, I'm going to need to get them printed.
The only catch is that I've never printed any of my digital
photos. Therefore, it would be wise for me to do a test run and get
some of my shots printed.
I've collected a
On Oct 11, 2009, at 11:40, Larry Colen wrote:
I've got a job Tuesday night taking photos at a charity event. As part
of this job, I'm going to need to get them printed.
[snip!]
I didn't see a question...?
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
OK, Here's a question.
In Photoshop Elements 5.0 I kept/keep a file of 2008 best and 2009 best photos.
That way, I can reference and print them without digging them up.
With the K-7, I've shifted to Lightroom 2.5.
The laptop quickly fills with new images, and I have to roll off past quarters.
So
Larry -
I think your question is how do I get files printable by a third party
from the raw files I've manipulated. Yes??
Here's one way...
With Lightroom in library mode -
Create a Collection - give it a name that describes the content
Find the images you want to get printed and add them
Bob -
See my answer to Larry - I think that answers your question, too.
Adding those files to a Collection just tags them in a database so
you're not keeping an additional actual image file.
-p
Bob Sullivan wrote:
OK, Here's a question.
In Photoshop Elements 5.0 I kept/keep a file of 2008
Thanks Paul,
I'm looking for a good way to keep the shots or copies up on the
laptop after I roll the originals off the laptop and into back=up
storage. This keeps me from fumbling around with extra drives all the
time.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Paul Sorenson
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:49:54AM -0500, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Oct 11, 2009, at 11:40, Larry Colen wrote:
I've got a job Tuesday night taking photos at a charity event. As part
of this job, I'm going to need to get them printed.
[snip!]
I didn't see a question...?
Sorry. The
In a message dated 10/11/2009 10:54:56 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
rf.sulli...@gmail.com writes:
OK, Here's a question.
In Photoshop Elements 5.0 I kept/keep a file of 2008 best and 2009 best
photos.
That way, I can reference and print them without digging them up.
With the K-7, I've shifted
I went to a new dance venue last night and the blues room was lit with
orange rope lights. In short, the red channel is fairly well exposed,
but the others are a couple of stops under.
As such, there's a lot of noise in the blue and green channels.
In lightroom, is there a way to convert to
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I went to a new dance venue last night and the blues room was lit with
orange rope lights. In short, the red channel is fairly well exposed,
but the others are a couple of stops under.
As such, there's a lot of noise in the
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I went to a new dance venue last night and the blues room was lit with
orange rope lights. In short, the red channel is fairly well exposed,
but
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:15:54PM -0800, Mark Erickson wrote:
Thanks, Godfrey. You've confirmed what I thought Lightroom was
doing--I just wanted to be sure that I wasn't missing anything.
I do have the compression preference set, and was a little surprised
that the imported files weren't
Here's a question for you
With CS2/Bridge, my image input workflow went like this:
1) Take images using ACR raw format.
2) Point Bridge at my SD card
3) Open all images using ACR (3.7, I think)
4) Save all as DNG to an incoming folder
ACR did a nice job of compressing the DNGs when it
[mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
Behalf Of Mark Erickson
Sent: 31 December 2008 01:04
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Another Pentax/Lightroom question
Here's a question for you
With CS2/Bridge, my image input workflow went like this:
1) Take images using ACR raw format.
2) Point Bridge
Pentax/Lightroom question
Here's a question for you
With CS2/Bridge, my image input workflow went like this:
1) Take images using ACR raw format.
2) Point Bridge at my SD card
3) Open all images using ACR (3.7, I think)
4) Save all as DNG to an incoming folder
ACR did a nice job
On Dec 30, 2008, at 19:35, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Best thing to do with Pentax cameras is use RAW-PEF in camera to
keep the file size as small as possible on the memory card, then
import into Lightroom with on-the-fly conversion to DNG. Then they
are stored as compressed DNG files in the
On average the same.
Godfrey - www.gdgphoto.com
On Dec 30, 2008, at 7:48 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Dec 30, 2008, at 19:35, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Best thing to do with Pentax cameras is use RAW-PEF in camera to
keep the file size as small as possible on the memory
Thanks, Godfrey. You've confirmed what I thought Lightroom was
doing--I just wanted to be sure that I wasn't missing anything.
I do have the compression preference set, and was a little surprised
that the imported files weren't compressed.
I guess I'll go back to .pef's.
--Mark
Godfrey
I have LR 1. I've TRIED to use it to create a web gallery. But every time I
do it resizes my photos.
I resize my own photos when I convert them to jpg. I try to make them the
size I think is good for viewing (landscape 700-800 mp wide, and portrait
660mp
tall max.) that also won't
Marnie, it is easy. Instead of making a web directory from small
images, you can make it from originals. In the parameters of web
gallery mode you can find a parameter that sets the size of imported
images.
Unfortunately I have LR 2.1, thus I cannot show you the screen shot,
but it is there and I
In a message dated 12/7/2008 11:21:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie, it is easy. Instead of making a web directory from small
images, you can make it from originals. In the parameters of web
gallery mode you can find a parameter that sets the size of imported
PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 December 2008 18:03
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Lightroom Question
I have LR 1. I've TRIED to use it to create a web gallery.
But every time I
do it resizes my photos.
I resize my own photos when I convert them to jpg. I try to
make them the
size I think
The image pages slider under Appearance is the one that controls
the final image size.
The quality slider just adjusts the amount of .jpg compression.
Cheers,
Dave
2008/12/8 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have LR 1. I've TRIED to use it to create a web gallery. But every time I
do it resizes my
In a message dated 12/7/2008 1:47:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The image pages slider under Appearance is the one that controls
the final image size.
The quality slider just adjusts the amount of .jpg compression.
Cheers,
Dave
==
Hey, great. I will
In a message dated 12/7/2008 1:09:11 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the flattery.
In the web module, on the Image tab there is a Size slider which you can use
to set the size of the long edge. I always shooot raw and leave it to the
web module to resize. I
All right, this has been driving me bonkers and I can't find an answer...
How do I change the default sort order in Lightroom? Every time I import
a directory of files it sorts the images by capture time and I have to
*manually* change it to sort by file name. What's worse is when I'm in a
Mark Roberts wrote:
All right, this has been driving me bonkers and I can't find an answer...
How do I change the default sort order in Lightroom? Every time I import
a directory of files it sorts the images by capture time and I have to
*manually* change it to sort by file name. What's
Scott Loveless wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
All right, this has been driving me bonkers and I can't find an answer...
How do I change the default sort order in Lightroom? Every time I import
a directory of files it sorts the images by capture time and I have to
*manually* change it to sort
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Roberts
Sent: 29 July 2008 19:32
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lightroom question
Scott Loveless wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
All right, this has been driving me bonkers and I can't
find an answer...
How do I change the default sort
Bob W wrote:
Unsurprisingly, there have been a lot of complaints about
these issues,
I'm quite surprised by that. OK, there should be a way to change the
default sort order on import, but until your post I had no idea there
wasn't - I've felt no need for anything other than what it does.
I have the Beta 2 version here, i'll try a sort on it and see what it does.
Dave
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Unsurprisingly, there have been a lot of complaints about
these issues,
I'm quite surprised by that. OK, there should be a way
Hi!
Here is a simple question which I cannot answer myself:
Suppose I have a folder with several photos. Some of the photos has
keyword tags associated with them. Some other photos don't have any
associated tags. How can I display only the latter?
Thanks.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Easiest way (Lightroom 1.4.1):
- click on the folder or collection of photos you want to search
- open the Find panel
- click the Text checkbox
- set the upper popup to Keywords
- set the Rule popup to Are Empty
The grid will now show all exposures which have no assigned keywords.
Godfrey
On
Got that!
Thanks!
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Easiest way (Lightroom 1.4.1):
- click on the folder or collection of photos you want to search
- open the Find panel
- click the Text checkbox
- set the upper popup to Keywords
- set the Rule popup to Are Empty
The grid will now show all
On Jun 1, 2008, at 16:37, Rick Womer wrote:
Thanks, Godders.
I found out why it wasn't working--I was clicking on
the slide mount in the Grid view, rather than on the
image itself. I don't want fingerprints on the
images, after all...
I was making exactly that same mistake when I started
I would like to add a photo to an existing Collection.
So, I read the f###ing documentation, which says to
select the photo in Library Grid mode, and drag it to
the desired collection in the Collection Panel.
Nifty, except that the photos don't drag anywhere.
How is it =really= done?
(and why,
On Jun 1, 2008, at 2:21 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
I would like to add a photo to an existing Collection.
So, I read the f###ing documentation, which says to
select the photo in Library Grid mode, and drag it to
the desired collection in the Collection Panel.
Nifty, except that the photos
Thanks, Godders.
I found out why it wasn't working--I was clicking on
the slide mount in the Grid view, rather than on the
image itself. I don't want fingerprints on the
images, after all...
Rick
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 1, 2008, at 2:21 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Thanks, Adam. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:37 AM
Subject: Re: Lightroom: Question about Clarity
Clarity is more like sharpening for the mid-tones only
Hi Everyone:
I have lack-of-clarity about Lightroom's Clarity function. This is from
Help: Clarity: Adds depth to an image by increasing local contrast. I
don't have an understanding of local contrast. What does local contrast
mean? What is added depth?
Also, I seem to like the photo
Christine -
I don't think you can duplicate the clarity function in the camera.
It is applying sharpening to the mid-tones. That's an
oversimplification. Here are the details.
http://www.oreillynet.com/digitalmedia/blog/2007/07/lightroom_11_the_clarity_tool_1.html
I've read in several
Clarity adds contrast in the midtones. Nothing magic about that. So
you don't need to worry about in camera settings and exposure. It
simply makes the picture pop a bit more. Some times I use it as a semi
sharpening tool.
MaritimTim
2008/4/12, Christine Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Everyone:
Several good responses, re, Clarity. They are all correct, it adds mid
tone contrast or punch.
I have a routine when developing in LR, and basically it it top to
bottom. Do the color balance first, then exposure, etc.. Sometimes if
my exposure is only a little on the low side, ie, less than 1/2
-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: Lightroom: Question about Clarity
Christine -
I don't think you can duplicate the clarity function in the camera.
It is applying sharpening to the mid-tones. That's an
oversimplification. Here are the details
Thanks, Tim. So increasing the contrast in-camera (record mode) wouldn't
help with midtone clarity then? Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: Lightroom
Walt: This was most helpful! Big thanks, Walt. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: Lightroom: Question about Clarity
Several good responses, re
in-camera (record mode) wouldn't
help with midtone clarity then? Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: Lightroom: Question about Clarity
Also I'm trying out now Lightroom as possible replacement of Elements on
my new PC. In Elements I used to store my converted (exported) JPG's
along with the DNG files in the same folder. I am used to identify
folders based on subject and subfolders by date taken. Elements does
import from card
On Apr 9, 2008, at 7:05, Henk Terhell wrote:
In LR I see so far no easy way to do thisin the same folder and upon
saving the JPG it is hard to find back the folder in which the DNG
file
is located.
I'm just starting to get the hang of Lightroom myself, but I think one
thing you need to
Op Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:42:57 +0200 schreef Charles Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Apr 9, 2008, at 7:05, Henk Terhell wrote:
I agree that there is tons to learn to use it properly. I've been
playing around with it for the past week and I've just barely
scratched the surface. There are a
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, while more or less on the subject, is there a way to edit 'maker
notes', especially lens name in the exif? If a shot is by an 'A series
lens' with SR set to 50, I know which one it is. I'd like to store that
I've never used it but this says you can use it to edit EXIF information.
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Multimedia/Graphic/Digital-Photo-Tools/EXIFeditor.shtml
I'm not sure but the lens name may be stored as a code of some type
which would be used in conjunction with a Lookup table to display
Op Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:36:27 +0200 schreef Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And, while more or less on the subject, is there a way to edit 'maker
notes', especially lens name in the exif? If a shot is by an 'A series
On Apr 9, 2008, at 12:36, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:42:57 +0200 schreef Charles Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Apr 9, 2008, at 7:05, Henk Terhell wrote:
I agree that there is tons to learn to use it properly. I've been
playing around with it for the past week and I've
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, while more or less on the subject, is there a way to edit 'maker
notes', especially lens name in the exif? If a shot is by an 'A series
lens' with SR set to 50, I know which one it is. I'd like to store that
info
Charles answered Henk's original question on point.
Summarizing, Lightroom does not create a JPEG, TIFF or PSD rendering
of a RAW file with your edits until you tell it to explicitly with
the Export function or implicitly with the edit in photoshop... or
edit in another editor commands.
Op Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:57:57 +0200 schreef Godfrey DiGiorgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
it such that Lightroom will recognize it. Lightroom recognizes all
Pentax lenses properly now, far as I can tell, given the data that is
available.
I obviously use another class of lenses than you do: My SMC
On Apr 9, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
it such that Lightroom will recognize it. Lightroom recognizes all
Pentax lenses properly now, far as I can tell, given the data that is
available.
I obviously use another class of lenses than you do: My SMC Pentax-FA
1:4,7-5,6 80-200
: woensdag 9 april 2008 20:58
To: PDML List
Subject: re: yet another Lightroom question
Charles answered Henk's original question on point.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
folder.
Henk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: woensdag 9 april 2008 20:58
To: PDML List
Subject: re: yet another Lightroom question
Charles answered Henk's original question on point.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Apr 9, 2008, at 15:55, Henk Terhell wrote:
Thanks Charles and Godfrey. It is clear that it will need a different
file structure as I'm used to with Elements by just keeping both DNG
and
JPG in the same folder.
I have a directory structure where my just imported from the camera
files
I have LR but not as a replacement for any PS programs.
It serves a very good purpose for some of my jpgs that have tricky WB
problems, but PS is still my main edit program
I am very happy with LR for the over all general edits it does.
I have not tried the new beta version, which i think
Matthew Hunt wrote:
My guess is that there's no way to modify the EXIF to indicate an old
A lens, because those lenses were never assigned an ID number.
Or there might be a single number amongst them that means aaah, it's an
old 'A' lens, bah!. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
There appear to be some tools around to edit EXIF, but they didn't work on
the 'maker notes'.
That's largely due to the private nature of the MakerNote tag data and
the nature of the way that TIFF/RAW files are organized. The
manufacturers usually don't publish their
The modern versions of VB will let you do it. In the bad old days you'd
need a batch script or two and a specially written exe or two to get it
done, (don't ask how I know that, I might give some details).
graywolf wrote:
I it were unix/linux a simple script would do it, in
windblows I
-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lightroom question (Godfrey?)
I replaced del with echo and all i got was Is there any body out
there, que Pink Floyd
Dave
On Dec 31, 2007 2:03 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've accepted the challenge I set you, and come up with an answer
Thanks to all who responded to my problem.
I will try and see what solution seems the best for me.
I will let you know what I used.
As usual I notice Godfrey knows about any bits from Lightroom.
Godfrey, were you involved in the coding of it or something? ;)
Cheers... and Happy New Year to you
On Jan 1, 2008, at 3:44 AM, Thibouille wrote:
... As usual I notice Godfrey knows about any bits from Lightroom.
Godfrey, were you involved in the coding of it or something? ;)
No, but I use it all day, every day, and study it in order to exploit
it to the max. :-)
HNY!
Godfrey
--
PDML
December 2007 18:11
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Lightroom question (Godfrey?)
I have had a dig around in Lightroom but nothing leaps out as an
easy
way to do it. However, I don't think you need to use Delphi to
do
what
you want
P. J. Alling wrote:
It would be possible to check for byte by byte comparisons, by using
FC a dos utility available on all windows systems to delete
duplicate files no matter what their name, I'm sure that linux/unix has
such a utility but I can't remember it's name right now. There are
several
I was responding to someone who made the complaint that they couldn't
delete the same image with different names. Just going through all the
reasons it would be difficult or impossible. (I kind of thought your
point was implied).
Mark Roberts wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
It would be
P. J. Alling wrote:
I was responding to someone who made the complaint that they couldn't
delete the same image with different names. Just going through all the
reasons it would be difficult or impossible. (I kind of thought your
point was implied).
Ah, sorry. That's what I get for not
I discovered I have multiple copies of some pictures in my Lightroom library.
The thing is one copy is Dng and the other is Jpeg.
I don't want to kill all Jpegs since some pictures are only available in Jpeg.
I would simply wanna kill all Jpeg copies which also exist in Dng format.
Is there a
I it were unix/linux a simple script would do it, in
windblows I have never found a simple way to do it. Maybe
someone will come up with one, so I will watch this thread.
I have a program (freeware, I think) called winmerge that
can do some interesting things like compare files and merge
in
] On
Behalf Of graywolf
Sent: 31 December 2007 17:40
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lightroom question (Godfrey?)
I it were unix/linux a simple script would do it, in
windblows I have never found a simple way to do it. Maybe
someone will come up with one, so I will watch
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob W
Sent: 31 December 2007 18:11
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Lightroom question (Godfrey?)
I have had a dig around in Lightroom but nothing leaps out as an
easy
way to do it. However, I don't think you
On Dec 31, 2007, at 3:08 AM, Thibouille wrote:
I discovered I have multiple copies of some pictures in my
Lightroom library.
The thing is one copy is Dng and the other is Jpeg.
I don't want to kill all Jpegs since some pictures are only
available in Jpeg.
I would simply wanna kill all
101 - 200 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
