Hello, everyone. It's been a while since I've posted to the list. I have a
quick question.
The exposure compensation and metering mode buttons on the rear door of my
PZ-1p have just failed. Does anyone know the easiest (cheapest) solution?
Wasn't there once a databack (
PZ-1p, KEH EX+ condition, includes grip strap, extra battery,
everready case, instruction manual, neckstrap, body cap, etc.
Beautiful condition and works beautifully. $325 including
shipping/insurance in the continental U.S.
If you'd like an SMC-FA 50mm f/1.4 lens in EX+ condition w/caps
PZ-1p, KEH EX+ condition, includes grip strap, extra battery,
everready case, instruction manual, neckstrap, body cap, etc.
Beautiful condition and works beautifully. $325 including
shipping/insurance in the continental U.S.
FA 28-70 f/4, EX+ condition, this one is the made in Japan one and
OK, I've made a fairly significant purchase (not an *ist D, though --
it's a mini DV camcorder) and I need to sell a few items.
PZ-1p, EX+ condition, includes grip strap, extra battery, everready
case, instruction manual, neckstrap, body cap, etc. Beautiful
condition and works b
ERN wrote:
>I wonder if it will also fit the PZ-1.
I emailed them at the prototype stage and they said it would. There would
be just a small cut-out where the PZ1p's panorama switch is. Now that the
grip is finally available I a bit sorry I sold my Z1.
- Original Message -
From: "David Miers"
Subject: Fuji Finepix S5000 vs. PZ-1p (warning: film wins hands down)
> Hi all
>
>
> Just finished an outing with a good friend of mine who recently
purchased a
> Finepix S5000.
> End of rant!
I think the Fine
lens on my PZ-1p
with 100 ISO film. The lens is not exactly tack sharp for landscape images,
but heck, I figured he needed the handicap and it really wasn't my intent to
make his new camera look bad.
When I first looked through the viewfinder, it was black and he had to push
a couple of butt
Agreed -- that's my favorite thing about the PZ-1p. Not only can you
dial in separate flash exposure compensation from the body, but this
even works with the built-in flash -- perfect for outdoor fill in if
that's where you find yourself in need of a tiny bit of flash
illumination
o damn
big a, the F100 however looks just rightand
it's certainly used by a lot of pros in my field [no not everyone has
gone
the d word!]
The issue was easily decided for me [isn't that often the case?] by
scoring
a PZ-1P with 28-105 powerzoom for GB
00 however looks just rightand
it's certainly used by a lot of pros in my field [no not everyone has gone
the d word!]
The issue was easily decided for me [isn't that often the case?] by scoring
a PZ-1P with 28-105 powerzoom for GBP 170 on Ebay [something o
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 5:08 PM
Alan Chan posted:
> Has anyone noticed Pentax cameras in Canada used to follow the US
> designation (Super Program, Program Plus etc), but now the same as the
rest
> of the world (P
Derby Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 21. februar 2004 18:59
Til: Pentax Discuss
Emne: ME-Super vs Super A (was Re: aha! PZ-1P)
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Hal & Sandra Davis wrote:
>>
>>
>
>
>>>>Pentax keepers: [...] M
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Hal & Sandra Davis wrote:
Pentax keepers: [...] ME Super, Super A,
What's the difference between the two? Ie if you have a Super A why
bother with the ME Super?
Kostas
I have both the ME-super and the Super A. Use the ME-super much more
Alan Chan posted:
> Has anyone noticed Pentax cameras in Canada used to follow the US
> designation (Super Program, Program Plus etc), but now the same as the rest
> of the world (P & MZ instead of PZ & ZX).
Now that Mr Robb has told us about the Super Program, yeah (it was news to me
when he p
The ME Super can operate without batteries at 1/125, 1/2000 and B
exposure settings, so it's worth considering over the Super A if you're
heading off into the wilderness for a while. It's the camera I took on
my last mountaineering expedition, and will probably take on any others
I may do. It
- Original Message -
From: "John Forbes"
Subject: Re: aha! PZ-1P
> Since when was America "most of the world"?
It was the Super Program here in Canada, which is most of the world.
William Robb
Since when was America "most of the world"? Sounds like G Bush speaking.
JF
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:17:56 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis"
Subject: Re: aha! PZ-1P
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Hal &
The difference is shutter priority exposure, full program mode, faster top
speed, TTL flash, better construction, and all in all a much superior
camera of the same size and weight.
JF
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:36:35 + (GMT), Kostas Kavoussanakis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004
- Original Message -
From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis"
Subject: Re: aha! PZ-1P
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Hal & Sandra Davis wrote:
>
> > Pentax keepers: [...] ME Super, Super A,
>
> What's the difference between the two? Ie if you have a Super A why
> b
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can't help you with the screens -- you might have noticed in
another thread
> that I mention having put a Beattie Intenscreen with
split-image in my PZ-1;
> however, I do not know if the screens for the PZ-1 will work
in the -1p. I
> suspect they don't, but I honestl
DJE posted a long message which I'll be snipping ... and rearranging.
> In general, does anybody want to try to talk me into or out of buying
> a PZ-1P? For my ends it actually looks like a better camera than the
> MZ-S (remember I don't own any Pentax AF lenses) and it'
>
> In my discussion of whether the MZ-S might be considered the "FA limited"
> camera, somebody suggested that my preferences might be well served by
> a PZ-1p.
>
> So, I looked at Boz's site and damned if I don't actually LIKE the
> PZ-1P, at least ba
Andre wrote
> Make it the SF-1n and you have much more quiet winding. Also: the
> best finder of AF Pentax cameras (glass, not plastic), big off axis
> or bounce flash can be used without cable & with the pop-up for
> fill-in, 2 i/s winder, TTL flash. A cheap alternative to a LX +
> winder, plus:
ate than old fashioned match needle systems.
> In general, does anybody want to try to talk me into or out of buying
> a PZ-1P? For my ends it actually looks like a better camera than the
> MZ-S (remember I don't own any Pentax AF lenses) and it's a LOT cheaper.
> Any we
This is a camera from the era where I had closed my eyes to Pentax (from
SF1 until *ist) because I had switched to Nikon for most of my work.
I had poo-pood this camera at first sight because it reminded me too much
of the SF1. I have not heard ANYBODY say anything about the SF1 on this
list, and
In my discussion of whether the MZ-S might be considered the "FA limited"
camera, somebody suggested that my preferences might be well served by
a PZ-1p.
This is a camera from the era where I had closed my eyes to Pentax (from
SF1 until *ist) because I had switched to Nikon for most
Yes, same procedure for the PZ-1 as well. The PZ-1p has a separate flash
compensation, cool.
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 14:30, Jens Bladt wrote:
> Very good! Thanks. I guess that can be done with the PZ1 as well?
> Jens
>
>
> ---Oprindelig meddelelse-
> Fra: Mark Roberts [mailt
"Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Fra: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>"Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Hi all
>>In MANUAL mode, the PZ-1/PZ-1p the TTL-flash metering works - even though
>>this is not ment
"Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi all
>In MANUAL mode, the PZ-1/PZ-1p the TTL-flash metering works - even though
>this is not mentioned in the instruction manual!
>Does MZ-S work the same way, I wonder? Anyone knows?
Yes, the MZ-S works the same way. In fac
Hi,
Jens Bladt wrote:
>
> Hi all
> In MANUAL mode, the PZ-1/PZ-1p the TTL-flash metering works - even though
> this is not mentioned in the instruction manual!
> Does MZ-S work the same way, I wonder? Anyone knows?
TTL flash metering works with all cameras in manual mode - I th
On the PZ-1 it is the only way to get round the lack of flash
compensation. The most important feature missing on the PZ-1 for me is
the flash compensation, I wish I had bought a PZ-1p instead at the time.
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 23:29, Jens Bladt wrote:
> Hi all
> In MANUAL mode, the PZ-1
Hi all
In MANUAL mode, the PZ-1/PZ-1p the TTL-flash metering works - even though
this is not mentioned in the instruction manual!
Does MZ-S work the same way, I wonder? Anyone knows?
Best Regards
Jens
My Pz-1P and extras is currently up for auction guys...
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2985958641
Check it out!
Cheers
Shaun
I can only agree.
Since I got the grip strap I've taken it off from camera only ONCE and put it back
QUICKLY :) The camera handles MUCH worse without it. I had to buy new case for my
camera, but even this way it was absolutely worth of every cent I payed!
BR, Margus
Stan Halpin wrote:
>
Do you have manuals for everything?
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Wilensky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:03 AM
Subject: FS: Excellent+ PZ-1p kit, 28-105 powerzoom, AF 500 FTZ flash
> FS: PZ-1p, purchased
I may be interested in your Z1P kit. Do you have any photos to show us
condition? How much i.e. rolls of film shot etc.?
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Wilensky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:03 AM
Subject: FS: Excell
Joe, would you consider selling the grip strap by itself? I've been looking
for one for a long time. I've had one backordered at BH for 2 1/2 months
and I'm tired of waiting. It's 69.95 new at BH, so how about $50 including
s/h?
Josh
Stan Halpin wrote:
> A wonderful secure aid to keeping the camera in hand. As it were.
> Having once used one, I would never again carry a PZ-1p without the
> grip strap.
I bought a grip strap for my Z-1p about two years ago. I don't regret it
one bit. It can get in the way when
At 10:36 AM 10/01/2004 -0800, you wrote:
Anyone heard of a grip accessory for PZ-1P ? It was mentioned in a short
thread in a older user club pdml, but I never heard of this. T'would be good
to know if one exists since the trusty beast gets a little unwieldy in some
cases.
Thanks
Ian
You are
age -
From: "Hal & Sandra Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: grip for PZ-1P
> Did Pentax make a AA battery grip for Z1P? You are talking about the
> grip-strap attachment??
> - Origina
Someone was developing a grip that would take AA batteries. I guess it
never came to fruition.
Jim A.
> From: "Ian bromehead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:36:34 -0800
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTEC
Did Pentax make a AA battery grip for Z1P? You are talking about the
grip-strap attachment??
- Original Message -
From: "greg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: grip for PZ-1P
> I have one and
The PZ-1p has what is called a "grip strap." Truly a
wonderful addition to the camera.
What you get is a small extension to the bottom of the
camera. No battery holder, no electronics, just the plastic
platform that attaches to the bottom. This gives you two things.
First, th
Anyone heard of a grip accessory for PZ-1P ? It was mentioned in a short
thread in a older user club pdml, but I never heard of this. T'would be good
to know if one exists since the trusty beast gets a little unwieldy in some
cases.
Thanks
Ian
Here are photos of the PZ-1p body and grip strap I listed yesterday
for sale (details follow):
http://people.clarityconnect.com/webpages/wilensky/eBay/PZ-1p.jpg
http://people.clarityconnect.com/webpages/wilensky/eBay/PZ-1p_front.jpg
http://people.clarityconnect.com/webpages/wilensky/eBay/PZ
If these are indeed the waning days of film as the dominant medium in
photography, I've been trying to decide how I want my film camera
lineup to look. I have screwmount and MX/Super Program cameras for
wonderful old-fashioned manual focus with older lenses, and I have an
MZ-5n and a
> at an exchange of US$ 0,00062, US$ 1023 (1995 value).
Sorry, it should be: 'an exchange of ITL to US$ = 0,00062,'
(etc.)
Gianfranco
=
To read is to travel without all the hassles of luggage.
---Emilio Salgari (1863-1911)
__
Do yo
> does anyone knows, how much it cost when
> introduced first back in 1995.?
I paid $589 for mine from a local camera shop;
the B&H mail order price was fairly close to that.
site:
http://home.alltel.net/dimaggio/pentax.html
PZ-1p body, with strap, body cap, box, extra battery, and manual. Mint-. $350
This camera is in great condition and has seen very little use. I have put about 5
rolls of film through it since purchasing it from a professional photographer who used
it
st clear before shipping).
Anything that doesn't sell will be going on Ebay next week.
________
PZ-1p body, with strap, body cap, box, extra battery, and manual. Mint-. $350
This camera is in great condition and has seen very little use
l
off any minute.
Francis Alviar wrote:
Hello to all,
I have an opportunity to purchase a friend's PZ-1P.
Since buying it he ran no more than 10 rolls through
the camera. He says it's too complicated to use and
prefers digital point and shoot cameras instead.
Anyway, my question is: How
Hello to all,
I have an opportunity to purchase a friend's PZ-1P.
Since buying it he ran no more than 10 rolls through
the camera. He says it's too complicated to use and
prefers digital point and shoot cameras instead.
Anyway, my question is: How much should I offer for
the camera?
Alan wrote:
>>Can it use the IR beam of the inner flash (or an external dedicated flash)
>>as a focus aid even if I don't intent to use the flash?
AC> You must use AF500FTZ then, the built-in flash won't do that. Don't know
AC> about AF360FGZ.
Affirmative. The projected pattern area is large
I'm beginning to see the Z1p as a valuable replacement for the LX when
stage photographing although I'm not sure how much more it will give me
compared to the SF-1n (I have not yet tried for such purpose). I don't
need 1/8000 but 4 i/s is interesting as is 1/250 sync. Noise is a major
factor,
on 11.09.03 21:49, Andre Langevin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is the focus aid for manual lenses working fine in low light on a PZ1p?
It can be sluggish sometimes, but confirmation works - of course it needs
good contrast.
> Can it use the IR beam of the inner flash (or an external dedicated
>
Hi,
Andre wrote:
What are the relative noise level of PZ-1p and MZ-S for shutter +
winding (compared
to SF-1n and MZ-5n cameras I already know as a reference)?
Can't compare them to the references, as I don't have either but,
compared to each other, I would say that the MZ-S
Hi,
Andre wrote:
> What are the relative noise level of PZ-1p and MZ-S for shutter + winding (compared
> to SF-1n and MZ-5n cameras I already know as a reference)?
Can't compare them to the references, as I don't have either but,
compared to each other, I would say that the
Andre Langevin schrieb:
>
> What are the relative noise level of PZ-1p and MZ-S for shutter +
> winding (compared to SF-1n and MZ-5n cameras I already know as a
> reference)?
Hello Andre!
That's not an easy question!
I would not only take the absolute noise level into acc
Both are in excellent condition. NEW GRIP STRAP for the body. 3-foot cable release
for body. Original boxes and flash cases and manuals, camera body cap, and the Pentax
10-foot and 3-foot off-camera flash hot shoe cables for off-camera flash. Lumiquest
soft bounce attachment for flash with
** I forgot to mention that this system also includes the databack. **
I have a PZ-1p with grip strap and "Golden Section" focusing screen.
(Yes, the factory screen is included) This camera has had less than 50
rolls of film through it and is in (KEH) Like New condition. It has all
Yes, the fabeled grip strap, new, with box, with a PZ-1p to go with it, excellent
condition and a Pentax-replaced NEW shutter that is operating totally like new. No
problems with this camera, except it's one too many for me these days. $400 includes
original box, manual, strap, body cap
Go to www.popphoto.com and look under their camera test archive. I think
the PZ-1p was tested.
DG
At 10:30 AM 6/19/03 -0400, you wrote:
I finally decided to order a PZ-1p from KEH to either replace or
complement the PZ-1 I've been using for a while.
I know most of the differences and
I finally decided to order a PZ-1p from KEH to either replace or
complement the PZ-1 I've been using for a while.
I know most of the differences and I'll download the manual, but I
also wanted to seek out some other sources of information to start
learning the differences between t
Marc J. Osborne wrote:
Secondly, I'm interested in locating the Tokina AT-X f2.5 90mm Macro
lens but haven't come up with anything on line in the United States.BH
Photovideo and Adorama don't have it.any ideas? Saw one on EBay recently
(listed as Tonika) and it went for $212. I'd like to know what
Hello everyone,
I've never made use of the User setting on my PZ-1p.I just customize the
settings as I see fit for the situation. I'd like to know how other list
members use it or would use it if the most likely lens on it is the
Pentax FA 1.7 50mm. What's the best setting for catching moments whe
Hello everyone,
I've never made use of the User setting on my PZ-1p.I just customize the
settings as I see fit for the situation. I'd like to know how other list
members use it or would use it if the most likely lens on it is the
Pentax FA 1.7 50mm. What's the best setting for catching moments whe
DX contacts are those reading the film speed, where you put the film
cartridge in.
regards,
Alan Chan
Thanks Alan. Pardon my ignorance but could you tell me where are the DX
contacts? Are they the small little metal pieces at the top and bottom
rolls of the film panel?
__
-Original Message-
> From: Chee Seang Ong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Hi all, I am new to the list and I have a problem to ask
> the experts on
> the list :)
> I was shooting a friend's wedding with my PZ-1P and
> suddenly it started
> to rewind all
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PZ-1P Problem with Rewind Mechanism
Before you send it to repair, perhaps you might try to clean the DX
contacts. It is a good idea to keep them clean. It happened to me once
but
never again. Don't know why.
regards,
Alan Chan
>Hi all, I am new to the list and I have a
ing a friend's wedding with my PZ-1P and suddenly it started
to rewind all by itself, and I have just begun the roll with just a few
shots! After a short while of rewinding sound being heard, the display
screen showed the sign of the film fully rewind. I opened up the film
cover and lo and behol
Hi all, I am new to the list and I have a problem to ask the experts on
the list :)
I was shooting a friend's wedding with my PZ-1P and suddenly it started
to rewind all by itself, and I have just begun the roll with just a few
shots! After a short while of rewinding sound being heard, the di
Last night was my daughter's High School Senior Prom. I'm an old pro with
the PZ-1, but took out the PZ-1p that Stan sold me. Popped the AF500 flash on
it and proceeded to take pictures of the kids.
This is the first time that I have tried using the fill flash on the PZ-1p.
Re
wrote:
> Hi Ken,
> I don't have a pz-1p, but I have 2 Pz 1s, and I love them!
> I saw a PZ-1p (used) in excellent condition at KEH for $465.00 you
> may have to settle for one that is like new or thereabouts, though it
> does seem logical to assume that there are some new on
Hi folks,
In spite of all the rage about the upcoming *ist series SLRs, I still love
my pz-1p to which I am so accustomed (and attached) to.
It has rather antiquated AF system (well, so it is said) but it works for me
just fine.
Anyway, I thought I should get a second body while the supply lasts
The PZ-1p is still listed as a current model on the Pentax USA website.
http://www.pentax.com/products/cameras/
At 05:31 PM 3/5/2003 -0600, you wrote:
Hi all
I just picked up a PZ-1p on ebay and wondered what range of dates was this
camera originally retailed by Pentax. This one is supposed to
Taz wrote:
Hi all
I just picked up a PZ-1p on ebay and wondered what range of dates was this
camera originally retailed by Pentax. This one is supposed to be never used
except one roll to make sure it workedso it should be like new. But
wondering how long it's likely been sitting a
Taz wrote:
Hi all
I just picked up a PZ-1p on ebay and wondered what range of dates was this
camera originally retailed by Pentax. This one is supposed to be never used
except one roll to make sure it workedso it should be like new. But
wondering how long it's likely been sitting a
Hi all
I just picked up a PZ-1p on ebay and wondered what range of dates was this
camera originally retailed by Pentax. This one is supposed to be never used
except one roll to make sure it workedso it should be like new. But
wondering how long it's likely been sitting around.
I'm considering selling my "Like New" PZ-1p. I purchased it in July 2001 from B&H and
it has had less then 25 rolls of film put trough
it. It includes the databack, grip strap, and FK-60 (Golden Section) screen.
Everything includes the boxes, manuals, and other accessories.
I'm considering selling my "Like New" PZ-1p. I purchased it in July 2001 from B&H and
it has had less then 25 rolls of film put trough
it. It includes the databack, grip strap, and FK-60 (Golden Section) screen.
Everything includes the boxes, manuals, and other accessories.
David,
Thanks for describing the steps you took.
My PZ-1 does not work the same.
I put a #2 K extension tube on it with a FA28-70.
I got the same exposure reading when I used the SPOT button or not.
The only way I could get different exposure readings was to change the PF
for spot or center weighte
Dave Dixon, you got me thinking and looking.
Now I am confused.
Here's what I know about my PZ-1.
Set the PF (personal function) at CE for center weighted metering.
Put the K24/2.8 on the PZ-1 and open it to f2.8.
Focus on that lamp across the room.
The camera reads 1/60th.
Press the SPOT button,
I'm a different David, but I'll stick my oar in. I've tried your expt
below, with a Z-1, and a SMC-M 200/4.
I can definitely get spot metering - a four-fold difference in exposure
changing between centre-weighted and spot.
However, if I change Pentax function 1, so that activating the "spot"
op
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> David,
> To clarify, you tried the experiment below. You mounted a K or M lens
> and checked metering without and with Spot? You got significantly different
> reading using Spot? Can you tell us what lens you used?
> My PZ-1 has never worked this way sin
The manual tells you which functions will work with the relevant lens
type. It does not mention anything about the contacts. The lack of
relevant contacts is why spot metering doesnt work with k or m lenses.
Cheers
Shaun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shaun wrote:
The manual tells you that. Spot o
Bob posted:
> Sorry you are annoyed. The PZ-1 manual is ambiguous about spot metering. It
> doesn't tell you clearly what is going on.
Well at least I now know. And I also know that the ZX-5n WILL spot-meter with
the M lenses.
David,
To clarify, you tried the experiment below. You mounted a K or M lens
and checked metering without and with Spot? You got significantly different
reading using Spot? Can you tell us what lens you used?
My PZ-1 has never worked this way since purchased new. I was an early
pur
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> David,
>
> So you can use Matrix metering with M lenses? My manual says "For lenses
> made earlier than Pentax-M (lenses without lens information contacts), center
> weighted metering system is used instead of multi(8)-pattern metering.
> However the spot metering
David,
So you can use Matrix metering with M lenses? My manual says "For lenses
made earlier than Pentax-M (lenses without lens information contacts), center
weighted metering system is used instead of multi(8)-pattern metering.
However the spot metering system can be used." This is non-sens
Sorry you are annoyed. The PZ-1 manual is ambiguous about spot metering. It
doesn't tell you clearly what is going on.
Page 41 states that Matrix metering doesn't work. ("When a lens with no lens
information contacts (lenses made before M lenses) is used, the
center-weighted metering mode is
e the camera uses center weighted
at both settings. Note that matrix metering does not work on lenses
without "A" contacts. The "Spot" indicator is still displayed on the
LCD display and on the display in the viewfinder even though center
weighted metering is selected, not spot met
is still displayed on the
LCD display and on the display in the viewfinder even though center
weighted metering is selected, not spot metering.
I have both the PZ-1 and the PZ-1p (Z-1p) the metering mode is correctly
displayed no matter what type of lens is used, the PZ-1 uses the same
spot display for s
I just checked the PZ-1 manual, which I have on my website:
http://www.wuthrich.cc under photolinks.
It says for the PZ-1 : Approx. 3 frames/sec (continues mode). (page 113).
As I don't shoot in continues mode, this is not a disadvantage for me versus
the PZ-1p at all, for others it mig
Can't say what the manual says for the PZ-1, but if you have the camera, try
it. You will not get spot metering with any of the K or M lenses. That's
how mine has worked since the first day (although it took me a long time to
know this!).
Try it in a dim room with a table lamp and a wide angl
Joe,
Actually, I think the winder speed is closer to 2.5 fps for the PZ-1. It
just isn't particularly faster than a winder. The PZ-1p is closer to 4 fps
(very similar to the 3.5 fps of a Motor Drive A for a Super Program). It is
not as fast as the 4+ of an LX Motor Drive. I thin
And 35mm coverage of the flash on the PZ-1, the PZ-1p has 28mm coverage.
The exposure correction for flash is way nicher/easier on the 1p. (I have the
PZ-1, this is really the feature I mess most on my camera versus the PZ-1p)
The PZ-1 has an interval setting, you can shoot a picure every xxx
Rob,
Motor drive on PZ-1 is slower, 2 fps vs 3+ for the PZ-1p.
No annoying Panorama frame lines in PZ-1 viewfinder, no Panorama at all !
Some functions get buried in the PF options on the PZ-1.
It seems like they brought some out of hiding on the PZ-1p.
Spot metering with old M & K lenses work
See <http://kmp.BDimitrov.de/>
Stan
on 2/13/03 4:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> pdmlers:
>
> what is the functional difference between the pz-1 and the updated pz-1p?
>
> i ask because i'm thinking of acquiring a pz-1 as a backup body to my
pdmlers:
what is the functional difference between the pz-1 and the updated pz-1p?
i ask because i'm thinking of acquiring a pz-1 as a backup body to my
glorious pz-1p
any thoughts would be welcome
be well
rob
on 17.01.03 11:40, Artur Ledóchowski at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Pentax FA28:2.8
>> I don't think I've ever taken a photo with this lens. Like new in box
>> except for the lack of a genuine Pentax front lens cap (it found a home
>> on the 43).
>
I have bought mine for 75 Euro. But usually it g
101 - 200 of 580 matches
Mail list logo
