On 24/11/19, Ralf R Radermacher, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Nothing wrong with that.
I'm still using Final Cut Pro 7 and so unless I want to make the jump to FCPX,
I have no choice.
And I don't want to make the jump.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and
|| (O) |Live
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 12:43 PM Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 23/11/19, Ralf R Radermacher, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >So, I'm afraid I and many of us will be stuck with Mojave for a long
> >time to come.
>
> Holding at El Capitan indefinitely!
>
Moi too
Dave
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
>
Am 24.11.19 um 18:42 schrieb Steve Cottrell:
Holding at El Capitan indefinitely!
Nothing wrong with that.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web : http://www.fotoralf.de
--
On 23/11/19, Ralf R Radermacher, discombobulated, unleashed:
>So, I'm afraid I and many of us will be stuck with Mojave for a long
>time to come.
Holding at El Capitan indefinitely!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and
|| (O) |Live Broadcast News
--
Larry, I bought the last non-ransomware version of Lightroom and
didn't bother even installing until almost two years later! The
"dehaze" tool was a useful addition but other than that it didn't have
anything to recommend it over previous versions as far as I'm
concerned. I can't see any reason to
>
> Lightroom 6.14 runs okay on MacOS Mojave. It runs “ok” on Catalina also, as
> long as you installed Catalina over an existing Mojave system with LR already
> installed. It’s the Adobe installer/license management app that doesn’t run
> on Catalina preventing LR 6 installation.
>
> My
—
Godfrey DiGiorgi - godfreydigio...@me.com - 408-431-4601
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Lightroom 6.14 runs okay on MacOS Mojave. It runs “ok” on Catalina also, as
long as you installed Catalina over an existing Mojave system with LR already
installed. It’s the Adobe installer/license management app that doesn’t run on
Catalina preventing LR 6 installation.
My solution to this
HDR and panorama functions don't do anything for me whatsoever. I don't
use face recognition or GPS info because I know who it is and where I am
most of the time.
Having said that, I use LR Classic and gladly pay the monthly because
it's as much a part of my photography as my cameras,
Am 23.11.19 um 14:26 schrieb Jan van Wijk:
It is the reason I will NOT upgrade my latest macBook to 10.15 Catalina for now.
Given that Mojave appears to be the last OSX version that runs 32 bit
software, an upgrade to Catalina would be software suicide for most of us.
I keep getting those
Hi Larry,
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:55:36 -0800 Larry Colen wrote:
>
>I recently came into the possession of a macbook pro that is a lot newer than
>mine, the downside is it only has a 1TB drive, and no ethernet port, but it
>does
have USB 3 and two thunderbolt ports. It had OSX Mojave installed
Am 22.11.19 um 23:55 schrieb Larry Colen:
Are there any absolutely must have features of the current lightroom that would
make it worth $120 per year?
That depends on what *you* must have...
To me, the library side is at least as important as the RAW development.
Also, I have 'bought'
> On Nov 22, 2019, at 11:36 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
>
> You might want to take a look at On1 Photo RAW 2020 as a replacement for LR.
> There will be a learning curve but it's a pretty powerful program which
> includes HDR, panoramas, focus stacking and their resize engine is based on
>
You might want to take a look at On1 Photo RAW 2020 as a replacement for
LR. There will be a learning curve but it's a pretty powerful program
which includes HDR, panoramas, focus stacking and their resize engine is
based on Genuine Fractals. The 30 day trial is fully functional and if
you
>
> Side question. I’ve got what I want on an external drive and I’d love to
> just copy that over, but if I boot off the external drive, migration
> assistant won’t seem to just transfer everything to the recently formatted
> internal drive, so I’m doing the long slow installation of High
On 3/7/2019 12:31:49, Paul Stenquist wrote:
When I opened the front door to get the paper, I saw a row of paw prints,
each single print followed by another, all in a straight line. Each print is
about 2 inches wide and the prints were about 8 inches apart. The critter
came all the way up on the
Looks like Bigfoot to me.
Cheers,
Dave
> On Mar 8, 2019, at 6:31 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>
> When I opened the front door to get the paper, I saw a row of paw prints,
> each single print followed by another, all in a straight line. Each print is
> about 2 inches wide and the prints were
://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: "ann sanfedele"
Subject: Re: What Kind of Critter?
I looked up some prints online and it certainly looks like skunk from
what I read..
"Skunks have five toes on their hind and front feet. Unlike most
mammal that
The hind paw prints from skunk are much different than the fore paw prints.s
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "ann sanfedele"
Subject: Re: What Kind of Critter?
I looked up some prints online and it certainly looks
Although I don’t know what they do in the wee hours.
WEE WEE !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: Re: What Kind of Critter?
Yes, all the same, and all in a straight line. There are so
Thanks Ann. Skunk is quite likely. The claws aren’t visible, but the dusting of
snow that partially covered the track may have obscured them.
Paul
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:38 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> I looked up some prints online and it certainly looks like skunk from what I
> read..
>
>
On 7/3/19, l...@red4est.com, discombobulated, unleashed:
>tail would drag in the snow, and for that matter its belly.
You rang!?!?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and
|| (O) |Live Broadcast News
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Can you show a group of them? An otter's tail would drag in the snow, and for
that matter its belly.
On March 7, 2019 9:31:49 AM PST, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>When I opened the front door to get the paper, I saw a row of paw
>prints, each single print followed by another, all in a straight
I looked up some prints online and it certainly looks like skunk from
what I read..
"Skunks have five toes on their hind and front feet. Unlike most mammal
that have large hind feet, and small
front feet the front and hind feet of the skunk are approximately the
same size. They also have
Yep. All the same and in a straight line. No side to side differential.
However, foxes and coyotes have four pads, and this critter has five.
Paul
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 3:06 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>
> Might also be a fox or coyote. Were all the tracks the same?
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
Ha...our definition of "pads" differs, but upon second look I see what
you mean.
-p
On 3/7/2019 1:20 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Good guess, but like cats, a fox has only four pads.
Paul
On Mar 7, 2019, at 1:41 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
Fox?
On 3/7/2019 11:31 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
When
Healthy house cat.(?)
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 11:20 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Good guess, but like cats, a fox has only four pads.
> Paul
>
>> On Mar 7, 2019, at 1:41 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
>>
>> Fox?
>>
>>> On 3/7/2019 11:31 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>> When I
Yes, all the same, and all in a straight line. There are some coyotes in the
wooded area behind my house, but they generally don’t come very close. Although
I don’t know what they do in the wee hours.
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 3:06 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>
> Might also be a fox or coyote. Were all
Might also be a fox or coyote. Were all the tracks the same?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: What Kind of Critter?
When I opened the front door to get the paper, I saw a row of paw prints,
each
Good guess, but like cats, a fox has only four pads.
Paul
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 1:41 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
>
> Fox?
>
> On 3/7/2019 11:31 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> When I opened the front door to get the paper, I saw a row of paw prints,
>> each single print followed by another, all in a
At 12:31 PM 3/7/2019, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>It's something with five pads. Too big to be a squirrel I think. Any guesses?
I would think not a skunk because I see no claw marks, and skunks have
non-retractable claws. Not a raccoon as they have long toes and narrow feet
with a pointed heel. It
Fox?
On 3/7/2019 11:31 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
When I opened the front door to get the paper, I saw a row of paw prints, each
single print followed by another, all in a straight line. Each print is about 2
inches wide and the prints were about 8 inches apart. The critter came all the
way
Uh!
It seems to be far too late to start photography.
And it seems to be futile to continue shooting.
Please do not hesitate to prove me I am totally wrong.
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.com/
Too true, and their imaging division is one of the more profitable
portions of the company...
On 11/20/2018 1:58 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
https://www.channele2e.com/news/ricoh-layoffs-2018-management-staff-cuts-business-unit-sale/
And from Reuters:
"Ricoh and legacy companies that supply
https://www.channele2e.com/news/ricoh-layoffs-2018-management-staff-cuts-business-unit-sale/
And from Reuters:
"Ricoh and legacy companies that supply office printing equipment such as Xerox
Corp have been looking to sell assets and focus on other areas of growth as
paper printing increasingly
> On 17 November 2018 at 10:49 Jostein wrote:
>
>
>
> Den 16.11.2018 22:30, skrev Steve Cottrell:
> > That's all true.
> > Except when I tried it, I placed my passport on the scanner, looked into
> > the camera, and a door opened on the machine, a large hand shot out and
> > slapped my face.
Den 16.11.2018 22:30, skrev Steve Cottrell:
That's all true.
Except when I tried it, I placed my passport on the scanner, looked into the
camera, and a door opened on the machine, a large hand shot out and slapped my
face.
With a dead fish, I assume? :-D
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
photos without glasses for people who wear them
all the time is beyond me.
John in Brisbane
-Original Message-
From: PDML On Behalf Of John Francis
Sent: Friday, 16 November 2018 10:34 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: What do you think about the future of Pentax
On 15/11/18, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I recently had to renew my (British) passport. Not only was I able to submit
>my photograph as a digital image - the passport itself also contains an
>encoded
>form of the image, readable electronically. And apparently at some UK
>airports
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:31 PM Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> When one gets to be my age, "the future" of anything is irrelevant.
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
I'm going to live forever. Or die trying.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-37552116
B
On 16 Nov 2018, at 18:39, Alan C mailto:c...@lantic.net>>
wrote:
They say the first person who will live to 150 is already living. You may just
be he!
Alan C
On 16-Nov-18 07:30 PM, Daniel J. Matyola
They say the first person who will live to 150 is already living. You
may just be he!
Alan C
On 16-Nov-18 07:30 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
When one gets to be my age, "the future" of anything is irrelevant.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
---
This email
When one gets to be my age, "the future" of anything is irrelevant.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
Bill Hewlett and David Packard planned on creating the paperless office;
instead, they gave us the laser printer.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 5:08 AM Jostein wrote:
>
> Den 15.11.2018 14:39, skrev Bruce Walker:
> > "Paperless office".
Den 15.11.2018 14:39, skrev Bruce Walker:
"Paperless office". Pffft. :-)
LOL.
When a new pharmaceutical product is launched, the company has to apply
for market authorisation in USA, Canada, EU, Japan and China separately.
Or used to anyway... Not sure about the current status of
The PDML is not a mess of cormorants. It's more like a collegium of
cormorantii.
Jostein
Den 15.11.2018 08:38, skrev Bob W-PDML:
On a point of grammar, the collective noun for cormorants is not 'flock' - we
say 'a mess of cormorants', and 'a shag-bag'.
On 15 Nov 2018, at 02:24, Igor
Not to be insulting to anyone but I do find myself being in the position of not
giving a Phalacrocorax.
> On 16 November 2018 at 02:27 Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Lads, I suspect you might be talking about two different shags.
> As I've written in my earlier response:
>
> >> I knew a
Lads, I suspect you might be talking about two different shags.
As I've written in my earlier response:
I knew a dance called "shag" (aka Collegiate Shag, which is different
from Carolina Shag).
Based on the location, background and the music mentioned, I suspect Larry
is talking about
On Behalf Of John Francis
> > Sent: Friday, 16 November 2018 10:34 AM
> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > Subject: Re: What do you think about the future of Pentax "flagship"
> APS-C-
> > camera line?
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:49:48AM -05
all the time is beyond me.
John in Brisbane
> -Original Message-
> From: PDML On Behalf Of John Francis
> Sent: Friday, 16 November 2018 10:34 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: What do you think about the future of Pentax "flagship"
APS-C-
&
to time.. Now, twenty years
later, I'm still using the printed-on-one-side only waste for internal test
reports!
John in Brisbane
> -Original Message-
> From: PDML On Behalf Of Igor PDML-StR
> Sent: Friday, 16 November 2018 2:28 AM
> To: PDML@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: What do
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:42:57AM +0100, Rick Womer wrote:
> IIRC, in an interview at one of the big shows last spring, a Pentax honcho
> said that a K-3ii successor was their first development priority.
I'm still hoping that this product will eventually materialise.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:49:48AM -0500, John wrote:
> On 11/15/2018 04:42, Rick Womer wrote:
> > IIRC, in an interview at one of the big shows last spring, a Pentax honcho
> > said that a K-3ii successor was their first development priority.
> >
> > It???s also true, though, that Ricoh (and all
On 15/11/18, John, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Cotty & Bob - you can just go ahead and get your minds out of the gutter
>right now.
A lot lower than the gutter John ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and
|| (O) |Live Broadcast News
--
On 11/15/2018 12:44, l...@red4est.com wrote:
Nope, those aren't shaggable either. Actually, for me nothing is. I might be
able to fake balboa, but I'd need at least a few minutes to learn to shag.
Wander into any bar in Myrtle Beach, SC & there's someone there who can teach
you. I learned
On November 15, 2018 9:26:53 AM PST, John wrote:
>On 11/15/2018 08:06, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> "Dance this mess around!" ;-)
>> https://youtu.be/VN8hV4AyNss?t=7
>>
>
>Except you can't dance "the shag" to that. You're going to need another
>Atlanta
>band:
>
On 11/15/2018 08:06, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
:-)
"Dance this mess around!" ;-)
https://youtu.be/VN8hV4AyNss?t=7
Except you can't dance "the shag" to that. You're going to need another Atlanta
band:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9GyJ9dhMgY
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tams
OR
On 11/15/2018 08:39, Bruce Walker wrote:
When I began my career in 1978 I worked for one of the then Big Three
word processor companies (AES Data, Canada's answer to Wang and IBM)
and the phrase "paperless office" was widely heard. Paper would soon
be obsolete.
When I wrapped up my full time
On 11/15/2018 04:42, Rick Womer wrote:
IIRC, in an interview at one of the big shows last spring, a Pentax honcho
said that a K-3ii successor was their first development priority.
It’s also true, though, that Ricoh (and all the other office equipment
companies) are having a terrible time as the
In my experience, consumer computing technologies gave boost to
higher paper consumption, including very frequently senseless paper waste.
In the era of typewriters, for a few errors, people would use a
white-out, and only occasionally would reprint the entire page. With
computers, people
When I began my career in 1978 I worked for one of the then Big Three
word processor companies (AES Data, Canada's answer to Wang and IBM)
and the phrase "paperless office" was widely heard. Paper would soon
be obsolete.
When I wrapped up my full time career in 2010 I worked in the Toronto
office
:-)
"Dance this mess around!" ;-)
https://youtu.be/VN8hV4AyNss?t=7
Bob W-PDML Wed, 14 Nov 2018 23:39:17 -0800 wrote:
On a point of grammar, the collective noun for cormorants is not 'flock' -
we say 'a mess of cormorants', and 'a shag-bag'.
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
IIRC, in an interview at one of the big shows last spring, a Pentax honcho
said that a K-3ii successor was their first development priority.
It’s also true, though, that Ricoh (and all the other office equipment
companies) are having a terrible time as the world abandons paper
documents.
Rick
On a point of grammar, the collective noun for cormorants is not 'flock' - we
say 'a mess of cormorants', and 'a shag-bag'.
> On 15 Nov 2018, at 02:24, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
>
> I knew a dance called "shag" (aka Collegiate Shag, which is different from
> Carolina Shag). I also knew the
some of us were hoping for an incremental upgrade to a 'flagship' which
had the sensor of the kp and the form factor of the k3-ii. it was not to
be and i finally went for the k3-ii.
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 14:02:59 -0500 (EST)
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> While considering various options
I knew a dance called "shag" (aka Collegiate Shag, which is different from
Carolina Shag). I also knew the slang meaning used chiefly by Brits.
But I just have learnt what species of birds this word applies to
(especially for people from NZ). That way it became so relevant to PDML!
But how
What PDML needs is a shagflip camera.
Jostein
Den 14.11.2018 20:02, skrev Igor PDML-StR:
Hi All,
While considering various options of replacing my failed camera, I've
considered of what would be the next steps of Pentax with respect to
the new models.
Asahi Man (a reputable
I would agree except, they can't really afford to give up any ground.
Pentax is known, as far as it is known, for having one of the best, if
not the best line of dedicated APS-C lenses, many like the limited line,
of extremely high build quality.
The K-1 is needlessly large compared to the
The k-1 works just fine as an aps camera. With their limited resources it would
make sense to only have one flagship.
On November 14, 2018 11:02:59 AM PST, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
>Hi All,
>
>While considering various options of replacing my failed camera, I've
>considered of what would be the
Not much my taste either, but it's an image that just doesn't work in B,
strong image or not.
On 3/17/2018 21:48, William Robb wrote:
I'm wondering how that would be a strong image in the first place.
On Mar 17, 2018 10:07 AM, "John" wrote:
On 3/17/2018 00:56, Bill
.
I've also attended numerous outdoor workshops and cannot remember any B+W
images in show & tell/critique sessions.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: What makes a photo work in color or black and white
I think color ea
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:37:44AM -0400, Stanley Halpin wrote:
> I think color easily detracts from an image. Many of my own personal
> favorites are monochromatic.
That's a (perfectly valid) personal viewpoint, of course. Not everyone thinks
that way.
My wife finds that monochrome detracts
I think color easily detracts from an image. Many of my own personal favorites
are monochromatic.
A few years ago I took several Nature Photography Workshops. As is typical in
such workshops, participants were invited to bring along a few of their own
favorites for show and tell and critique.
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 8:16 PM Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I realize all are speaking tongue in cheek here, but I recall some
> dramatic images from Chicago’s Southside Irish parades. And some post
> parade shots from NY’s Hell’s Kitchen with green garb and red blood. Great
>
I realize all are speaking tongue in cheek here, but I recall some dramatic
images from Chicago’s Southside Irish parades. And some post parade shots from
NY’s Hell’s Kitchen with green garb and red blood. Great stuff.
Paul
> On Mar 17, 2018, at 9:48 PM, William Robb
HAR!
ann
On 3/17/2018 9:48 PM, William Robb wrote:
I'm wondering how that would be a strong image in the first place.
On Mar 17, 2018 10:07 AM, "John" wrote:
Color works where it's an integral part of the image. How are you
going to shoot a Saint Paddy's Day parade
I'm wondering how that would be a strong image in the first place.
On Mar 17, 2018 10:07 AM, "John" wrote:
> On 3/17/2018 00:56, Bill wrote:
>
> To me, colour generally works for weaker compositions. It's sort of the
>> photographic equivalent of baffle them with
On 3/17/2018 00:56, Bill wrote:
To me, colour generally works for weaker compositions. It's sort of the
photographic equivalent of baffle them with bullshit.
Strong composition will work in either colour or B, weaker composition may
work in colour because of the colour (yer average sunset, for
On 3/16/2018 12:51 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
One of the nice things about digital photography is being able to choose
after the fact whether to process a photo as color or black and white.
Technically, I suppose that was also possible with color film, not that
it was often done.
Sometimes
when I was shooting film, I shot interesting subjects in both BW and
chrome when I could.Then I could decided later.. and also had backup if
one or the other rolls of film met a premature demise.
I like bw for documetary work & street shots and when the color is
irrelevant and/or just gets in
Bruce Walker wrote:
I'm still figuring out my reasons for going with b, but they
generally incorporate some of your points, especially the subject
isolation, with some of Paul's -- mood, etc.
I find that a lot of spontaneous location shots will have a
disharmonious colour palette, so b
I'm still figuring out my reasons for going with b, but they
generally incorporate some of your points, especially the subject
isolation, with some of Paul's -- mood, etc.
I find that a lot of spontaneous location shots will have a
disharmonious colour palette, so b removes that factor entirely
For me the choice of black and white over color is more about mood and
expression rather than a need to parse the photos elements. BW is subtle,
romantic and laid back. Color is vibrant active and alive. Of course there are
degrees of expression within each genre. Punchy, high contrast BW moves
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>I have a DA* 16/50/2.8 that I would sell. Pentax Marketing people worked hard
>to get me this replacement for a problematic lens. I was shooting the North
>American International Auto Show for The NY Times and Pentax scrambled to get
>me a lens that was said to be tested
I have a DA* 16/50/2.8 that I would sell. Pentax Marketing people worked hard
to get me this replacement for a problematic lens. I was shooting the North
American International Auto Show for The NY Times and Pentax scrambled to get
me a lens that was said to be tested and perfect. Lightly used
Just after reading this thread I encountered Augustine's Laws "put forth by Norman
Ralph Augustine, an American aerospace businessman who served as Under Secretary of the
Army from 1975 to 1977."
Law #18 may be applicable here:
Law Number XVIII: It is very expensive to achieve high
Not sure if it's the same problem but my 60-250/4 is in France for
service right now. ETA next Friday.
AF it wasn't dead, just refusing to focus to infinity. On the K-3ii it
flat out refused. On the K-5 it made a couple of tries and eventually
got there after 4-5 seconds.
Jostein
Den
Sorry to hear that. I've had my 17-70 about 3 1/2 years now and it
continues to work fine. Maybe I just got lucky with it.
Mark
Rick Womer wrote:
The SDM motor is failing on my 4-month old DA 17-70 lens.
One would think that in NINE years of production Pentax would have
corrected the
Yeah, I’m sure they’ll fix it, too.
Meanwhile I have out-of-town leisure time in late Oct and early Nov, and may
not have a working, suitable zoom.
Argh.
Should have bought the Sigma. The Pentax seemed the better lens, though, and I
thought =surely= they’d have fixed the SDM in 9 years!
That's an older design. I assume they're locked into the original SDM Motor,
but I'm sure they'll fix it.
Paul via phone
> On Sep 15, 2017, at 10:33 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> The SDM motor is failing on my 4-month old DA 17-70 lens.
>
> One would think that in NINE
Bummer. I had one fail right out of the box and one 2 weeks later.
Dave
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
> The SDM motor is failing on my 4-month old DA 17-70 lens.
>
> One would think that in NINE years of production Pentax would have
> corrected the
Found it! Thks very much!
On 12-May-17 22:15, Stanley Halpin wrote:
More specifically, note the Memo on the middle of the left column. Select WiFi
in tool menu 2, Step 2 select Communications Info and the password is revealed.
IIRC.
stan
On May 12, 2017, at 4:09 PM, Stanley Halpin
More specifically, note the Memo on the middle of the left column. Select WiFi
in tool menu 2, Step 2 select Communications Info and the password is revealed.
IIRC.
stan
> On May 12, 2017, at 4:09 PM, Stanley Halpin
> wrote:
>
> Page 89-90?
>
>
>> On May 12,
that page shows the screenshots where to put the password, but what is
the password to put in?
On 12-May-17 22:09, Stanley Halpin wrote:
Page 89-90?
On May 12, 2017, at 3:49 PM, Jos de Fotograaf wrote:
Dear group, Ricoh website tells me to find the password for
Page 89-90?
> On May 12, 2017, at 3:49 PM, Jos de Fotograaf wrote:
>
> Dear group, Ricoh website tells me to find the password for connection in the
> user manual..I was not successful..plse help...
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
>
Certainly no one could say you spent your time Pining!
Even you "rejects" are admirable.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 1:37 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss List
Subject: What I've been up to while I was gone
I've been back from Oregon for a couple of
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Larry,
You probably have a very good camera! ;-)
Several of them, but I only brought two on the trip.
Jokes aside, - this is a great set!
Thanks a bunch.
(It even forced me to take a couple of minutes from my current "crunch
time" to comment on your photos.)
Larry,
You probably have a very good camera! ;-)
Jokes aside, - this is a great set!
(It even forced me to take a couple of minutes from my current "crunch
time" to comment on your photos.)
Either that part of Oregon is so "photogenic", or you were very inspired,
but there are many very good
That was probably custom slr
On April 12, 2017 7:38:49 AM PDT, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
>
>... that sells complicated ("universal") plates that look like
>mini-version of bread-board optical tables, i.e. with many wholes,
>IIRC,
>of different sizes, most likely some
Boris,
You need color!!!
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I made a resolution for this year (2017) - to post PESOs exclusively
> in b This is ain't easy as this spring is extremely beautiful over
> here. Yet, I keep trying to
101 - 200 of 5601 matches
Mail list logo