Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. wrote:
My niece is performing in Chicago this weekend (Friday, so I'm looking for help
today Thursday) - a small YMCA auditorium, I don't know what the lighting will be but
I guess whatever is usual for stages.
No flash of course: Should I use 400 speed film or faster?
Michael Perham wrote:
BTW, my daughter is Clara in this year's Nutcracker for those who
don't know, that's the lead roll and she is the youngest girl from our
studio to have the role. She is just turning 16 this December.
Another proud ballet dad :)
Good to see I am not alone.
Kevin
-
Maris,
Have you got a monopod?
I've used Fuji 800 (NHGII or Press) with good results in these situations.
Good Luck, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My niece is performing in Chicago this weekend (Friday, so I'm looking for
help today Thursday) - a small YMCA auditorium, I don't know what
This works:
http://www.jbuhler.com/html/pdml.html
Gianfranco
--- Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juan J. Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.jbuhler/com/html/pdml.hmtl
Hi Juan,
Are you sure the URL is correct? I'm not able to open the
page.
Am I doing something
Juan J. Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.jbuhler/com/html/pdml.hmtl
Hi Juan,
Are you sure the URL is correct? I'm not able to open the page.
Am I doing something wrong?
Ciao,
Gianfranco
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
-
This message is from the
Well am I really ill tempered? Or just blatantly outspoken?
As far as photographic quality prints go there are two points to consider.
1. this is a photography list. 2. people keep saying their printer makes
photographic quality prints.
The is nothing to say a print that is not photographic in
Hi Wendy.I'm getting some too.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Wendy Beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 23:40:28 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bouncing posts
Well, not really bouncing posts. I posted a couple of times to the
list
tonight and I saw them appear
Thanks Aaron
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
A very good lens. Little distortion.
But, imho, don't replace primes.
They still have their appications,
esp. when you want the sharpest possible eng
for an enlargement.
Collin
From: Hiroto Yamashita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I've been looking at a Tokina AT-X 24-40mm F2.8 to replace some
Several times I've written and asked why this site cannot use a numbered
index. It is easier to look at a numbered index and then find a numbered
entry. It is easier then attempting to read similiar entries from a long
list, unnumbered.
Thank you,
Burt
NYC
USA
-
This message is from the
Mafud wrote:
how many
Joe Six-packs have printers*pr* capable of producing photorealistic
images?
Mafud Sir,
Who cares about Joe Sixpack and Jill Boxed White Wine? They use
point-and-shoots and get Walgreens 4x6 prints made from them. THAT isn't
photorealistic quality either!!
I have to
Juan B. wrote:
http://www.jbuhler/com/html/pdml.hmtl
Juan,
I get The specified server could not be found for this. Sure it's the
right URL?
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
Bob W. wrote:
good story. Which scanner, printer, paper and ink/pigment did he
eventually choose?
I don't know. I haven't paid that much attention and I haven't seen his
setup yet. I'm encouraging him to write up the process for a photo magazine
or a photo website like
Bob R. wrote:
I'm particularly interested in the responses. I personally think that
digital is a long way from replacing BW. I doubt that there are many
printers available at any cost that can do justice to the full grey scale of
a BW print.
You haven't seen enough Piezography prints yet!!
On Thursday, November 15, 2001, at 05:21 AM, Bob Rapp wrote:
I'm particularly interested in the responses. I personally think that
digital is a long way from replacing BW. I doubt that there are many
printers available at any cost that can do justice to the full grey
scale of
a BW print.
On Wednesday, November 14, 2001, at 08:24 PM, Bill Owens wrote:
And will meet you at 12:00 Noon on Friday, November 16, 2001 at Camera
World
with my 4x6 digital print that is equal to or better than the average
minilab print.
Cue the music from The Good, The Bad And The Ugly.
-Aaron
-
The Contax N1 is finally out, using the full-frame 24x36mm 6-megapixel
Philips CCD. See:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0111/0501contaxn1digital.asp
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
Just a poll:
Where do you buy your film?
Cory Waters
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
John Mustarde wrote:
Last Friday I finally got all my 78 rpm records transferred
to 8-track tapes. So what's next?
But John, that's a technological step backwards! You should be
transferring those 78s to wax cylinders, which are easily listened to
with a pin and a piece of paper.
-Aaron
For slides, EPT or EPJ (do they still make these?), or if no tungsten then
possibly Fuji Multispeed. For prints the Fuji Press 800 is admirable.
I shot indoor sports on 400-1600asa, lens apertures generally 2.8 and wider.
Kind regards
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
In a message dated 15/11/01 10:32:47 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been looking at a Tokina AT-X 24-40mm F2.8 to replace some of the
primes I own.
Is this a good lens? How much is a reasonable price for it?
Hiroto
Hiro
Miyama have one listed in their ad this
MacBurt wrote:
Several times I've written and asked why this site cannot use a numbered
index. It is easier to look at a numbered index and then find a numbered
entry. It is easier then attempting to read similiar entries from a long
list, unnumbered.
List maintainer Doug Brewer answered you at
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Wednesday, November 14, 2001, at 08:24 PM, Bill Owens wrote:
And will meet you at 12:00 Noon on Friday, November 16, 2001 at Camera
World
with my 4x6 digital print that is equal to or better than the average
minilab print.
Cue the music from The Good, The
And at $6500 US!
This is inside the tantaive price spoken by Pentax for the MZ-D.
Sounds like Pentax had a change of heart then, because the sensor is
obviously available, and it can be done for the money that was rumoured.
Thanks for nothing Pentax - you have now officially MISSED THE BOAT!!!
I purchase all my wedding film (Fuji) from B H in NYC. Heck. Let's say I
buy most of my film from them. Locally, Portland OR, I like to buy the 12
exposure rolls of Fujicolor from Ritz Camera. Short of bulk loading BW
film, I wish I could get BW film in 12 exposures.
Jim A.
From: Cory or
I buy all my Velvia and Provia at the local camera store...
Christian Skofteland
-Original Message-
From: Cory or Brenda Waters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Just a poll:
Where do you buy your film?
Cory Waters
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
I get it to open but I can't find the PDMLers pics. Where are they?
DG
At 03:34 AM 11/15/01 -0800, you wrote:
This works:
http://www.jbuhler.com/html/pdml.html
Gianfranco
--- Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juan J. Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Johnston wrote:
[snip]
I have in my own collection several LARGE prints...
(larger than 11x14) that look superb.
A photorealistic printer in this day and age costs $200-$300. The Epson C80,
the Canon S600. Both capable of gorgeous output up on up to letter size
sheets. Certainly
Cory or Brenda Waters wrote:
Just a poll:
Where do you buy your film?
BH or Adorama.
Of course, I can visit them -- I don't know if I would want to use mail
order these days, with the threat of irradiation of mail coming up.
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
More fun would be an M39M42 and an M42K plus the AF 1.7x AF and have
autofocus Leica lenses on a Pentax body.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Brogden
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
800 ASA and no tripod
From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Film for ballet performance
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 01:39:16 -0600
My niece is performing in Chicago this weekend (Friday, so I'm looking for
help today Thursday) - a
Rob Brigham wrote:
And at $6500 US!
Thanks for nothing Pentax - you have now officially MISSED THE BOAT!!!
What's new? :)
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Hi Dick,
That's strange, I have no problems with the photos.
You are not able to see even the thumbnails?
There should be 14 of them.
Gianfranco
- Original Message -
From: dick graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:46 PM
Subject: Re:
Although I'll never buy one I like the looks, sort of like a digital Maxxum
9.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Johnston
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: First 6-mp full-frame
Gosh, I had no idea Shel was even bigger than I am.
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This works:
http://www.jbuhler.com/html/pdml.html
Gianfranco
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
-Original Message-
From: Bill D. Casselberry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tele-Takumar 300 f6.3
Paul wrote:
It takes a smaller filter if memory serves correctly, and other
than that, everything
Thanks for that tidbit. I found it strange that the lens was so
light. When I get home I will have to look at the specs of the 300 f/4
Takumar and compare.
I do not see myself using the lens much, but then again you never
know. But there was no way I was going to walk away
No pics on my system
Bill Owens wrote:
Gosh, I had no idea Shel was even bigger than I am.
This works:
http://www.jbuhler.com/html/pdml.html
Gianfranco
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/pow/enter_pow.html
-
This message is from
Hi,
The way I read the article, the camera is not yet out but will be
available in February. Let's see if it actually hits the stores and
will find its way into the hands of consumers.
Mike Johnston wrote:
The Contax N1 is finally out, using the full-frame 24x36mm 6-megapixel
Philips
I usually buy from New York, either BH (www.bhphotovideo.com) or Adorama
(www.adorama.com). I have to pay about $6 ups charges, but you can save far
more than that if buying a reasonable amount (I usually get at least 10
rolls at a time, usually 20 and stash it in the fridge). For me it's mainly
START START START START
In a message dated 11/15/01 7:43:20 AM, MacBurt writes:
Several times I've written and asked why this site cannot use a numbered
index. It is easier to look at a numbered index and then find a numbered
entry. It is easier then attempting to read similiar entries from
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, tom wrote:
They work on IE, not netscape.
The end of the table and the body seem not to be coded...
Oh gosh, I always do that. Sorry guys. I'll fix it right away.
Ever since I switched to Opera I end up not realizing when I have
unfinished tables in my pages...
Give
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
Juan J. Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.jbuhler/com/html/pdml.hmtl
Hi Juan,
Are you sure the URL is correct? I'm not able to open the page.
Am I doing something wrong?
Sorry, my mistake. Make that slash a dot:
WHY CANT WE LOOK LIKE THIS???
BECAUSE DOUG DOESN'T HAVE THE TIME OR FUNDS TO DO THIS.
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Sorry Netscape users.
I just fixed it, and checked the page on Netscape for Win2000.
The URL, again, is
http://www.jbuhler.com/html/pdml.html
(not that the pictures are really worth all that anticipation)
Apologies,
j
--
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Cory or Brenda Waters wrote:
Just a poll:
Where do you buy your film?
Usually at BH in New York.
The last order went to filmshop.com, which was a bit cheaper than BH.
Service was just as good, but I didn't have any problems. When you
have problems with an order, BH is
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Bob Walkden wrote:
good story. Which scanner, printer, paper and ink/pigment did he
eventually choose?
Yes, tell us Mike! Some of us also shoot a Leica with 50mm Summicron,
and would like to know what's better to print digitally than the piezo
setup!
Piezo prints also
Sheesh, first Shel looks like Hannibal Lecter, now Gianfranco turns out
to look like Stanley Kubrick!
Why can't I look like Tom Cruise? Why why WHY?
-Aaron
who looks more like Ed from Barenaked Ladies
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
With a couple of birthday's on the horizon and Christmas around the corner
the budget is a little tight but I'm constantly looking for a little more
space in certain shots.
Does anyone have any experience with the 19mm Vivitar? I realize this by
far no pro lens but it affords me a wider angle
One vote for BH...
On 11/15/01 5:58 AM, Cory or Brenda Waters wrote:
Just a poll:
Where do you buy your film?
Cory Waters
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
Jim...
Have you shopped at Citizen's Photo for film? I'm curious to see how their
prices compare to BH. Obviously BH will be cheaper, but by how much?
t
On 11/15/01 6:27 AM, Jim Apilado wrote:
I purchase all my wedding film (Fuji) from B H in NYC. Heck. Let's say I
buy most of my film
Along the same lines, I just saw on BH a Sigma 24mm 2.8 - any comments on
this as well?
thanks,
Delano
From: Delano Mireles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:30:11 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Low budget WA?
With a couple of birthday's on
Bill Owens wrote:
MacBurt wrote:
WHY CANT WE LOOK LIKE THIS???
BECAUSE DOUG DOESN'T HAVE THE TIME OR FUNDS TO DO THIS.
NOT BAD BILL BUT YOU SHOULDA USED SOME EXCLAMATION MARKS!!!
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: OT: CD-RW Question
Very true. There's a lot to be said for having a local place
to go to when
something goes wrong. But there are alternatives to CompUSA.
There are plenty of
small, independent copmuter shops around; you just
In a message dated 11/15/01 1:52:21 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't use flash. So, with that in mind, would you suggest an 800
speed film over a 400 speed film? I never heard of a faster film
neutralizing color cast. Why is that?
I suggested an 800 speed film
Some answers to great PDMLers:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Congratulations Albano!
Great story (and a happy ending, no less)
Thanks, Mark.
Tom C wrote:
Glad you got your LX back! Good you stood your ground. Too bad there's
jerks out there like that. Makes you wonder if some of the police
Juan J. Buhler wrote:
When you have problems with an order, BH is usually excellent.
This certainly hasn't been my experience of them. when they had a problem
verifying a credit card of mine once, they delayed my shipment for nearly a
week and were extremely rude and unhelpful, especially when
i buy from the film shop in new york. fuji reala mostly. when you buy
$100.00 worth the shipping is free. delivery is about two days .
Received: from smtpin-102-4.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.55) by
storefull-162.iap.bryant.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2001
09:36:37 -0800 (PST)
Bill Owens wrote:
MacBurt wrote:
WHY CANT WE LOOK LIKE THIS???
BECAUSE DOUG DOESN'T HAVE THE TIME OR FUNDS TO DO THIS.
NOT BAD BILL BUT YOU SHOULDA USED SOME EXCLAMATION MARKS!!!
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
Darn, I knew I forgot something :-)
On Thursday, November 15, 2001, at 02:40 PM, Delano Mireles wrote:
Along the same lines, I just saw on BH a Sigma 24mm 2.8 - any comments
on
this as well?
I have the manual focus one and I'm quite fond of it. Flare control
isn't great (even with the dinky hood), but it's nice and sharp.
Hi all,
http://www.photocritique.net/g/s?zzn33n-p15121403
As always, comments and criticisms appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Bill Peifer
Rochester, NY
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
Okay, Bill:
What does Digital mean? All photos submitted to PUG have been
digitized.
What does Professional mean? (Heck, I'm a professional, but not in
photography.)
Thanks,
Joe
P.S. I thought Synchronicity was being dropped.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Hi Bill,
It's really a wonderful shot!
If I have to find something to critique, the girl dressed in red
suffers from the dark wooden truss (?) in the background right
over her head, which is a bit disturbing, but it's almost
splitting hairs...
Well done!
Gianfranco
- Original Message
Albano wrote:
The police asked some more data, a handshake and I went back to work with
the
biggest smile and happiness you can imagine
I hope that among the data there wasn't your address!
And then:
/ Thanks. We have a football cheer song that claims Policia
Federal, la verguenza
On 15 Nov 2001, at 14:19, Rob Brigham wrote:
And at $6500 US!
This is inside the tantaive price spoken by Pentax for the MZ-D.
Hi Rob,
Pentax never made claims about the price, the figure that was floating about
was a speculated price only based on the cost of one off CCD purchase that
On 15 Nov 2001, at 8:58, Cory or Brenda Waters wrote:
Just a poll:
Where do you buy your film?
LP Photographics in Artarmon (North Sydney), good prices and plenty of
big fridges but shipping might be a little expensive for you though.
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:58 PM
Subject: PUG 2003 Themes
Okay, Bill:
What does Digital mean? All photos submitted to PUG have been
digitized.
I dunno, it was just a word that popped into my
Thanks for the kind words, Gianfranco. I agree -- that wood in the
background bothers me a bit too. Amazing how much 210mm will compress
foreground and background. Would have liked to get closer to the girls and
use a wider lens, but I didn't dare distract them any more that I already
was.
I am ~assuming~ that you are talking about the A*
200mm f4 macro (not the new FA*). The A* version comes
up rarely on e-bay and they seem to sell for around
$850 U.S. That is aproximately what I paid for mine in
like-new condition with a soft case and a B+W UV
filter attached. Mind you, though,
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:29:10 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
I have the chance to get a 200 f/4 macro lens, but I have no clue what a
reasonable
price for this lens is. Can anyone help?
The Pentax A* 200/4 ED IF macro sold new for $950 US at BH and other
repuitable mail-order companies. It always held
Wednesday, November 14, 2001, 5:31:30 PM, Tom wrote:
TR I do not have experience submitting digital photos to a newspaper, but I do
TR know that most such photos have been taken with a 2000-2500 ppi SLR such as
TR the Kodak DCS *20 series or the Canon D30. In fact the old AP2000 was a 2000
TR ppi
Well, if they put them into full auto mode, the pictures should
be pretty sharp and well exposed. The days of photography
courses that insist on fully manual cameras for the students are
pretty much over. I've seen messages posted here that support
doing that because it frees the mind to
Thursday, November 15, 2001, 6:55:48 AM, Mike wrote:
MJ Len wrote:
Except, perhaps, for the Olympus E-10 and E-20n which SLRs with
manual zoom, and will zoom just as fast as you want. They're
priced a lot lower than Nikon and Canon SLR digitals. DPReview
is a good place to read about them.
Thursday, November 15, 2001, 6:27:07 PM, Robert wrote:
RH William Robb wrote:
Find something else to talk about.
RH Why? This is so much fun.
RH Bob
Cause you are hijacking my thread... I didn't want to start another
discussion - only future will tell, and it really doesn't matter to
me.
TO BAD IT DOES NOT ACCEPT PENTAX GLASS
BOB RAPP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Studdert
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: First 6-mp full-frame digital SLR is out
On 15 Nov 2001, at 14:19,
The word professional has changed in meaning over the past
several decades. At one time there weren't a lot of professions
because there had to be a clear path to a professorship in the
career field to be one. Now, all one has to do to be considered
a professional is to earn a living doing
If memory serves, Olympus guaranteed reliable exposure down to 2 seconds but the
camera will actually go much longer.
Reciprocity and all that kicks in so I guess they figured they'd best not claim too
much.
ppro
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, lbparis wrote:
The word professional has changed in meaning over the past
several decades. At one time there weren't a lot of professions
because there had to be a clear path to a professorship in the
career field to be one. Now, all one has to do to be considered
a
BH for everything but the Kodak Gold 100, which I get at K-Mart for less than $1.35
per roll.
Bill Sawyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cory or Brenda Waters
Sent: November 15, 2001 8:59 AM
Just a poll:
Where do you buy your film?
Cory
I have the above lens for sale. I'll take the first $35.00 plus $5.00 shipping.
If you are interested please reply OFF LIST to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The glass is clean and it works perfectly. The only distraction is a very little paint
loss around the filter ring.
Believe me, it 'it's =very=
When I need some last minute film for a job, I will buy at Citizens. It
still is cheaper to buy at BH even with the shipping added.
I use to buy at Camera World in their retail store downtown. They were
still higher than BH but I was a loyal customer, having started with them
way back in the
I was reading that to shoot meteors, you should
use the widest angle lens possible and do
5-to-10-minute exposures. Does anyone here have
any tips they'd like to share? This will be my
first meteor shower.
Thanks,
Amita
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Richard Seaman writes:
I know what a professional is when applied to a person, but what
qualifies a photo to appear in the PUG professional gallery?
Does it have to be a photo shot for money?
It doesn't say anything about professional photography. I like the idea as its
open to
http://homepage.mac.com/simonster/PhotoAlbum3.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Haven't I answered this before?
The huge reason is that majordomo does not have this capacity. Since it doesn't,
someone would have to build a hack. That someone would have to be someone other than
me, because A.) I have no time and B.) I have no interest in spending the time to
build a
Me: What does Digital mean? All photos submitted to PUG have been
digitized.
Bill: I dunno, it was just a word that popped into my head.
Me again: Okay...barring further clarification, it's an open month.
Me: What does Professional mean? (Heck, I'm a professional, but
not in photography.)
If anyone has the time I'd appreciate any critique on the following image:
http://www.photocritique.net/g/s?00n2Vn
Thank you!
Delano
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
I have found the 19mm Vivitar reasonably sharp, but flare prone and poor
contrast. Seems well built though. It is in the same price range is the
Zenitar 16mm fisheye. The Zenitar is a better lens in almost every aspect
(about the only way the Vivitar is better is that you can use any filter
folks,
Here's a NASA website talking about the upcoming Leonid shower:
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast08nov_1.htm
There's a great looking photo on the site, taken with a fisheye over a four
hour period.
The Leonids are annual, and this one's supposed to be much better than the
Todd,
I have not heard of this lens. Do you know where I might be able to find
out more about this lens? I'm intrigued by the thought of a fisheye.
Thanks,
Delano
on 11/15/01 9:42 PM, Todd Stanley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found the 19mm Vivitar reasonably sharp, but flare prone
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:11 PM
Subject: Buying a scanner
Also I might be able to get a scanner so I need you opinion on which
brand
and model is best for around $500. Sorry my budget is
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
John Mustarde wrote:
Last Friday I finally got all my 78 rpm records transferred
to 8-track tapes. So what's next?
But John, that's a technological step backwards! You should be
transferring those 78s to wax cylinders, which are easily
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Jim Apilado wrote:
I purchase all my wedding film (Fuji) from B H in NYC. Heck. Let's
say I buy most of my film from them. Locally, Portland OR, I like to
buy the 12 exposure rolls of Fujicolor from Ritz Camera. Short of
bulk loading BW film, I wish I could get BW
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Juan J. Buhler wrote:
Hi folks,
I put together a page of pictures I took when meeting other people
from the list. Nothing great photographically (some are almost good,
though) but a nice collection of good moments.
http://www.jbuhler.com/html/pdml.html
That's a
I buy all my film from Don's Photo. Since I work there, it makes sense...
:)
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Richard Seaman wrote:
folks,
Here's a NASA website talking about the upcoming Leonid shower:
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast08nov_1.htm
That all looks good for us in Australia, but I dont know what time I should
be looking?
anyone?
Kevin
-
This message is from the
I don't use flash. I don't own a flash. Flash is intrusive and
annoying for the type of photography that I do.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might test a flash indoors to see what I mean.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/pow/enter_pow.html
Bill Owens wrote:
I'm anxiously awaiting the Big Brown Truck with the first component of my
desire to wax nostalgic and have cameras I have owned and liked in the past.
The first is an Olympus OM-10 with the GC manual adapter and 50/1.8 lens,
which should arrive today or tomorrow.
Is the
I may be wrong in this but I think the OM-10 has OTF metering only in the
flash
mode while the more professional single digit OM's (OM2/3/4) have OTF in
both
flash and ambient light metering.
BTW, it's a lovely camera and part of a truly great system.
RK
If my understanding of the manual is
What's to critique? An excellent image! I can see nothing that needs improvement.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Delano Mireles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax discuss pdml.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:31 PM
Subject: Critique request
| If anyone has the
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
