On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Bob Rapp wrote:
Pentax has changed their Japan website with a new look, but no new
products.
http://www.pentax.co.jp
I noticed the online shop (is this new or did I miss it before?).
Mainly accessories, and it has that Sharan mini-spotmatic for sale.
I also noticed new
Hallo ADELHEID!
- Original Message -
From: Adelheid v. K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 9:36 PM
Subject: October PUG is open
the October PUG is ready to go.
Eigentlich wäre es doch schön, wenn es dort auch einen direkten Link
zur PUG
- Original Message -
From: gfen
Subject: RE: New Pentax Site
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote:
To see the new products you have to click your heels three
times.
I still don't seem 'em!
You LIED to me Bruce, and now I'm going to cry.
He forgot, you also have
Maybe the successor to the aborted full frame MZ-D was to be a cropped
3-4MP camera as was thought here at the time the first one was pulled.
Maybe Pentax recently realised that this would no longer be saleable
either. Sigma only get away with it because they have Foveon. A 3-4MP
cropped bayer
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:09 AM
Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know, I hate to start speculation all over agin, but the fact that
they didn't release anything might indiciate that they just chose to
And a red leather Pentax miniskirt!
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
He forgot, you also have to be wearing magic pixie shoes.
William Robb
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, William Robb wrote:
He forgot, you also have to be wearing magic pixie shoes.
With enough of the magic pixie dust, you could probably see anything. :)
--
http://www.infotainment.org
The destructive character is cheerful. - Walter Benjamin
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Maybe the successor to the aborted full frame MZ-D was to
be a cropped
3-4MP camera as was thought here at the time the first one
was pulled.
Maybe Pentax recently realised that this would no longer be saleable
on 10/1/02 12:14 AM, Doug Brewer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instructions are on http://www.pdml.net on the services page.
At 8:42 PM -03009/30/02, Margo Ellen Gesser wrote, or at least typed:
Dear Petaxians,
It's not that I don't enjoy all these messages, but things are getting
Ugh. I hate meaningless Flash intro pages.
--Mike
-Original Message-
From: Bob Rapp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:New Pentax Site
Hi gang,
Pentax has changed their Japan website with a new look, but no new
products.
http://www.pentax.co.jp
on 01.10.02 4:42, Cliff Nietvelt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SMC-F 35-135 mm f3.5-4.5 (would need to buy used)
SMC-FA 28-105mm f4-5.6 (power zoom)
SMC-FA 28-105mm F3.2-4.5 AL (newest lens)
If anyone could comment on the optical performance of any or all of these
lenses, it would be
Well, not new, but new for me.
I just too delivery of an SMC Pentax 6x7 300mm f/4.
Nice lens. Minimum focus is a mere 17 feet. Good thing I have
extension tubes..
The 82mm filter that looks so large on my 45mm looks about the
right size on this bad boy.
L8R
William Robb
On Tuesday, October 1, 2002, at 08:51 AM, Rob Brigham wrote:
Maybe the successor to the aborted full frame MZ-D was to be a cropped
3-4MP camera as was thought here at the time the first one was pulled.
Maybe Pentax recently realised that this would no longer be saleable
either. Sigma
All Pentax needs to do is buy some of those Kodak
chips and stick them in the MZ-D, rememeber it was
finished they just needed a chip for it. Now that said
who knows if they are just waiting for cheaper chips?
__
Post your
tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think we'll have a DSLR available in the spring. I'm a bit
surprised we didn't get any word of it at Photokina, but, again, we
all know Pentax are marketing freaks and don't do things the easy way.
Well, *if* Pentax has a DSLR in the works, I'm not surprized
Nosal, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ugh. I hate meaningless Flash intro pages.
meaningless Flash intro is redundant.
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
Photography and writing
Nikon had a few things, like the 70-200 VR/AF-S finally going on sale and a few PS
digis. Nikon did release a new DSLR this year at PMA. It seems to be a combination of
Nikon being more interested in PMA (they sell more in NA) and them announcing new
products when they have them. In many ways
Sorry. I guess I forgot to mention that you also have to chant, Only from the minds
of Minolta as you consume a fifth of rum.
From: gfen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I still don't seem 'em!
You LIED to me Bruce, and now I'm going to cry.
Wendy: Let me start by saying I am a tried and true Pentax LX man with, at
last count, four of them. I doubt many people, even camera store sales
people, would think that anyone who uses an LX is a pro. As soon as they see
35mm Pentax, no matter which one it is, they think amateur -- maybe
Hi folks,
With all this talk about what was -- and what wasn't -- at Photokina, I
found it interesting to read a short article about a local
commercial/advertising photo studio in the business section of yesterday's
local newspaper. It's a busy studio with big accounts with a major grocery
There's a guy works down the chip shop swears he's Elvis.
Just about as likely as this happenning, although I wish it to be
true...
-Original Message-
From: Brendan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 October 2002 15:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Pentax
Hello. I have a couple of AF-500-FTZ questions:
1)Guide Number-164/ISO 100. Is 164 an accurate guide number for this flash? I realize
that flash manufactures tend to over rate their guide number, but I thought I read a
comment here that Pentax uses the flash zoom head at telephoto position to
Dun't know about downloadtimes, but comparing images side by side is nonsense: just
get a dual (or more) BIG (21) monitor setup and say goodbye to light table. In fact,
on the screen one can see a few images magnified at the same time -- try that with
slides!
He's either fond of loupes, or has
the guide # is accurate with a 85mm F1.4 lens with the
zoom head set to 85mm. The AF500FTZ is Pentaxes most
powerful flash and it does have some range to it (
only a bit more than the 280 ) but the trade off is it
eats batteries and can take forever to recharge. The
price you pay for sun tanning
Yes Francis I have just learned myself that the 500ftz is not compatible with
the LX but the 280T is compatible with both the PZs and LXs. Also I don't
think the 500 has any more power than the 280T. In fact the older flash may
even have a little more real power... You might be wise to look at
Hi all,
I'm about to buy two Rodenstock filters (49mm - for the M 28/2.8, M 50/1.7,
M 135/3.5, and M 75-150/4), but in the archives I've found some info on
their incompatibility with lenshoods - apparently they're too thin to
grab the thread of the hood. Any comments on this? Maybe it's not as
Mishka wrote:
Dun't know about downloadtimes, but comparing images side by side
is nonsense: just get a dual (or more) BIG (21) monitor setup and say
goodbye to light table
I can see where this approach could be problematic, though. Six or eight
different shots (Polaroids, maybe?) taken
I got a bargain on the F50/1.4, so the A is FS.
VGC
$75. + $5 shpg/ins.
Collin
Steven Desjardins wrote You know, I hate to start speculation all over again, but the
fact that they didn't release anything might indicate that they just chose to skip
this show, no matter how big it is.
From what I could see, a number of companies decided to skip the show. I almost
had
Hi All,
Just wanted to say thanks for all the useful monopod advice.
A 4 section Manfrotto is on its way. I decided to hold off on getting a
specific head for it until I see if one of my current heads is
sufficient (and mainly because I found a demo A 2X-S that I thought I
ought to pounce
I don't really follow all of this, mainly because any new tech that
comes out, I can't afford, and I'm quite happy with what I've got now..
But, all this talk of IS lenses and converters and other fun stuff..
What's the chance it has nothing to do with 35mm, and that the IS lenses
were intended
Cotty,
No, Ferengi.
Bruce
Tuesday, October 1, 2002, 1:51:36 AM, you wrote:
Teeth, and an eyepatch.
An eyepatch in the before, and a full set of teeth in the after.
Dan Scott
C Oh, come on, might as well just go for a Photoshopped-on head from a
C full-on Klingon female...
C :-)
C
Mark,
FWIW, my local lab owner here said that from his experience, PMA shows
are bigger and more important for product announcements than
Photokina. I guess frequency is one reason. A show every two years
doesn't make for as good a venue as a show every year. Perhaps Pentax
and Nikon have
Then how can you post? (I know, but it had to be asked by someone and it
might as well be me).
At 10:28 AM 10/1/2002 -0300, you wrote:
on 10/1/02 12:14 AM, Doug Brewer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instructions are on http://www.pdml.net on the services page.
At 8:42 PM
Forbes magazine:
http://www.forbes.com/technology/2002/09/30/0930photokina.html
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
Photography and writing
When you are that far behind the curve, it's bound to happen over and
over. At some point you have to take the plunge and start upgrading
from that. If they follow that logic, you will never see a DSLR from
Pentax. The possibility exists - it may not make enough money to
justify. It hasn't
tom,
I'm curious, what makes it so attractive to you compared to the
Contax?
Bruce
Tuesday, October 1, 2002, 7:32:42 AM, you wrote:
snip
t I generally don't pay too much attention to what goes on at these
t photo shows, but I must say the new Hasselblad has really turned my
t head. It
William,
Congrats! I love mine. I debated long and hard about the IF version
but couldn't justify the doubled cost. Although is doesn't focus too
close, it takes wonderful pics.
Brother Bruce
Tuesday, October 1, 2002, 7:46:53 AM, you wrote:
WR Well, not new, but new for me.
WR I just
No you're wrong the only shoes that work like that come from a witch, in OZ
so I guess you
have to go to Australia by way of Kansas. (Hows that for semi free
association).
At 08:03 AM 10/1/2002 -0600, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: gfen
Subject: RE: New Pentax Site
On Tue,
As opposed to meaningful flash intro which is an oxymoron.
At 10:58 AM 10/1/2002 -0400, you wrote:
Nosal, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ugh. I hate meaningless Flash intro pages.
meaningless Flash intro is redundant.
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
Photography and writing
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Yes Francis I have just learned myself that the 500ftz is
not compatible with
the LX but the 280T is compatible with both the PZs and
LXs. Also I don't
think the 500 has any more power than the 280T. In fact
...or, to pay ebay fee
-Original Message-
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:44:50 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: anyone care to bid? :)
WOW!!!
now my question is who has that much cash laying
around to buy it all ?
---
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: AF-500-FTZ FLASH QUESTIONS
Bump your film speed up to 400 and you've doubled the power of your
flash.
Guess that should be quadrupled.
tv
Oh, come on, might as well just go for a Photoshopped-on head from a
full-on Klingon female...
:-)
Cotty
Ahh, the sensitive approachóI like it!
Subtle, yet quietly persuasive.
Deft touch there, Cotty.
Dan Scott
K'eplah
I've been kindof thinking about this too. But I've
been thinking more along the lines of medfo lenses
with USM. Think about it... a 645 or even 67 lens with
a USM driven AF.
Nick
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gfen,
Boy, I gotta admit you have a very interesting idea
there...
This redesign coincide with the change of company name. My guess is that the Asahi is
no longer to be found on Pentax web site.
Pål
Some interesting(?) tidbits from the Pentax universe
Apparently, this years Pentax photokina delegation was among the largest ever
including the boss and heaps of engineers. Weird, considering they had nothing to
show. However, it turns out that they indeed showed a LOT but behind closed doors
Err... Bill Gates?
Lukasz
-Original Message-
From: Brendan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: anyone care to bid? :)
WOW!!!
now my question is who has that much cash laying
around to buy it all ?
---
Or to pay for shipping from California to Canada (Where I live)..
You canucks out there... imagine the taxes @ the border !
-Original Message-
From: Mike Ignatiev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: anyone care to
tom,
That and cost are the two current deterrents. I really would like the
power that it has. It will work with my leaf lenses and P67II TTL and
MZ-S TTL.
Bruce
Tuesday, October 1, 2002, 10:58:36 AM, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wendy: Let me start by saying I am a tried and true Pentax LX man with, at
last count, four of them. I doubt many people, even camera store sales
people, would think that anyone who uses an LX is a pro. As soon as they
see
35mm Pentax, no matter which one it is, they
One thing I have learned about Pentax is they sneak
things onto market and don't blow their horns. I have
a feeling IS 645 lenses are on their way.
--- Pål_Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some interesting(?) tidbits from the Pentax universe
Apparently, this years Pentax photokina delegation
on 01.10.02 19:19, Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
They are playing with stuff in the lab. They have nothing close to a
production sample.
I assume this is about the digital slr. In fact, the pentax digital slr was
manufactured but not marketed. There are many
And also not surprising to see big electronic companies, like Sony, trying
to convince us that film is dead.
DG
At 01:11 PM 10/1/02 -0400, you wrote:
This is one report by a non photographer. The information is therefore
anecdotal in nature. If you are looking for meaningful information on
It doesn't sound very plausible.
Pål Jensen wrote:
Some interesting(?) tidbits from the Pentax universe
Apparently, this years Pentax photokina delegation was among the largest ever
including the boss and heaps of engineers. Weird, considering they had nothing to
show. However, it turns
None of us can bid: there are no Pentax or Asahi cameras memtioned in the
description of the camera collection.. Otherwise
Brendan wrote:
One thing I have learned about Pentax is they sneak
things onto market and don't blow their horns. I have
a feeling IS 645 lenses are on their way.
I don't believe we'll see IS lens for MF until it has been used in Pentax 35mm gear
for years. Pentax ususally destill
Daniel wrote:
It doesn't sound very plausible.
Why not? It's very common. All manufacturers do this. Photokina is the biggest meeting
place between the manufacturer sand their distributors. This gives an opportunity to
discuss and show products with engineers present. They receive valuable
I'm holding out for their OTHER auction, the world's ONLY BANANA MUSEUM!
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, [iso-8859-2] £ukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
Sorry for the first htmls message.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1385251371
Happy bidding :
£ukasz
--
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Nick Wright wrote:
I've been kindof thinking about this too. But I've
been thinking more along the lines of medfo lenses
with USM. Think about it... a 645 or even 67 lens with
a USM driven AF.
I think you'd need an AF 67, first.. But yeah. I actually forgot the USM
idea
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, [iso-8859-1] Pål Jensen wrote:
I don't believe we'll see IS lens for MF until it has been used in Pentax 35mm gear
for years. Pentax ususally destill features into their MF gear after 35mm has paid
for it.
Wouldn't it make more sense, though, since film is already assumed
In the current KEH catalog (paper version) they have a
picture of an LX with motordrive attached. There is
some sort of button visible on the motordrive. Is this
a vertical shutter release? If not, what is it? TIA.
Nick Wright
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Just freeze the one you folks already have. Call it the Pentax Pie, and then trot out
the same thing show after show.
BR
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well Bruce, I think we will have to prepare another pie for you and wait
until next year's PMA ;-)
Now this is the stuff I'm talking about, good going Pal! I had to go back
and check to see who the sender was. It looks just like news from the cave.
DG
At 08:00 PM 10/1/02 +0200, you wrote:
Some interesting(?) tidbits from the Pentax universe
Apparently, this years Pentax photokina
Sorry about this, I have just subscribed and I'm trying to figure out how it all works.
Handmaid
___
Freeserve AnyTime, only £13.99 per month with one month's FREE trial!
For more information visit
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 17:56, Brendan wrote:
All Pentax needs to do is buy some of those Kodak
chips and stick them in the MZ-D, rememeber it was
finished they just needed a chip for it. Now that said
who knows if they are just waiting for cheaper chips?
Actually they are waiting for the 4
Well I remember a few years ago, someone here posed
the question as to why Pentax had not introduced an AF
67 camera. I believe the general consensus was
something along the lines that the motor required to
focus such large lenses would be much too big for the
camera body. But with USM the motor
Here's another one - I'm quite active on the asking front now :)
Here's my dilemma - M 135/3.5, M 75-150/4, or a VS1 70-210/3.5 (the first
and bigger one). I would use them on an MX or a Super A body. I will shoot
in BW (hence the ease/cost [not that i would buy anything now] of the use
of
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 21:33, dick graham wrote:
Now this is the stuff I'm talking about, good going Pal! I had to go back
and check to see who the sender was. It looks just like news from the cave.
It's that damn' caveman again, faking my e-mail address.
cheers,
Pal
;-)
Bruce Dayton scribed below:
David,
So how are you cutting your negs. I store mine in neg pages that
hold
up to 3 in a strip. That works just fine in the scanner without
further cutting. What are you doing?
David,
Bruce:
I cut my 6x6's in to 3 strips for the neg holders too,but
the holder
HAHAHAHA :-) actually Val you need to rerelease some
of those tales from the cave for the newbies again.
Valentin Donisa wrote:On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 21:33,
dick graham wrote: Now this is the stuff I'm talking
about, good going Pal! I had to go back and check to
see who the sender was. It
Paul Baser head of Hewlett packard camera division:
Pentax and HP are in may ways different. Whereas Pentax is concentrating on the
professional market, HP will have it's main focus on the consumer market.
Huh?
Apparently, Pentax is involved in the new HP Photosmart 850.
Pål
I was thrilled when I saw the announcement of the new Carl Zeiss 400/4 for the Contax
N system until I saw that it weights the same as a 500/4. What a waste
Pål
I tried out the Canon 35-350 L lens today. It flares more than any Pentax lens ever
made even indoors! It's AF was slower than on the Pentax 600/4 in spite of USM (with
the EOS 1n). Otherwise they lens looked great. Useful range at least. The optics is
probably better than one could expect
Nick wrote:
Well I remember a few years ago, someone here posed
the question as to why Pentax had not introduced an AF
67 camera. I believe the general consensus was
something along the lines that the motor required to
focus such large lenses would be much too big for the
camera body. But
Gfen wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense, though, since film is already assumed to be
dead by your average consumer in the US and Europe, but its still got a
ways to go to MF and pro usage.
Again, I'm not Pentax scholar, or business scholar, but it seems like
there's a wide open market,
David,
I let mine hang out. The lid isn't actually on them and it isn't
moving at all. I think it helps to keep the negs flat also. You need
to have some out both sides to get the best support.
Bruce
Tuesday, October 1, 2002, 12:15:02 PM, you wrote:
DB Bruce Dayton scribed below:
DB
If you can't buy it, it isn't a product. The next thing you'll be telling us is that
Pentax made the DSLR, makes more DSLRs than any one else and is the market leader.
Until I can buy one in BH, it's as much a product as a cruise trip to Pluto is.
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E5l_Jensen?= [EMAIL
I had heard that it might go down that way, but I was under the
impression some info would be leaked regarding the DSLR.
Whatever.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J. Matyola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
It doesn't sound very plausible.
Pål Jensen wrote:
Some interesting(?)
Bruce wrote:
If you can't buy it, it isn't a product. The next thing you'll be telling us is that
Pentax made the DSLR, makes more DSLRs than any one else and is the market leader
I was responding to post who said that the camera wasn't out of the laboratory
something that isn't true. Its a
And entertainment was provided by Elvis, who jumped out of the safe.
Oh yes, they are also digital selling bridges.
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E5l_Jensen?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some interesting(?) tidbits from the Pentax universe
I have no idea about the contents of this safe is but it's
-Original Message-
From: Jerome Daryl Coombs-Reyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:16 PM
snip
Pentax had nothing (much) to show. Period. Goshdornit people, can we just
move on?! I mean, really. Don't you still have cameras on your shelves
(apparently
It's easy, you just tell us where you've seen Elvis, Judge Crater or DB Cooper field
testing a Pentax DSLR, and I get hit in the face with a pie.
Welcome aboard.
BR
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry about this, I have just subscribed and I'm trying to figure out how it all works.
Handmaid
OK - tell me it was a spelling error. A 35-350mm lens? I know we've come a
long way and that technology is developing at a very fast pace, but such a
zoom can not be a good lens. Well, if it can, I'd like some data for proof,
and then I'd eat my humble pie (or Bruce could send me his - I don't
on 01.10.02 22:03, Lukasz Kacperczyk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK - tell me it was a spelling error. A 35-350mm lens? I know we've come a
long way and that technology is developing at a very fast pace, but such a
zoom can not be a good lens. Well, if it can, I'd like some data for proof,
I was about to agree Lukasz;
The 35-350 being a 10x zoom range, you'd think it was a crap-tastic lens but
some people seem to like it:
http://www.photographyreview.com/35mm,Zoom/Canon,EF,35-350mm,f-3.5-5.6L,USM/
PRD_83419_3128crx.aspx
That being said; I personally would steer clear of a lens
I did talk with the Finnish importer´s guys at the Photokina and the general feeling
was of a disappointment.
I did learn that Pål has good sources, though.
BTW we did have a PDML meet at the Photokina - Dario, Patrick and myself - a small one
indeed but we thought that it would be a good idea
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, [iso-8859-1] Pål Jensen wrote:
It certainly is a perfect power source for IS. BTW The more
conspiratory among us can perhaps figure out if Pentax made changes to
the 645 lens mount to provide for IS when they upgraded the 645N to
the 645NII.
Alrighty then, gearheads, get
Pentax and HP are in may ways different. Whereas Pentax is concentrating
on the professional market, HP will have it's main focus on the consumer
market.
Huh?
That's easy. Ham, eggs and chips.
*hic*
Oh swipe me! He paints with light!
Hey JCO,
Right down your alley!!!
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:31 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: anyone care to bid? :)
Or to pay for shipping from California to Canada (Where I live)..
You
35-350 L
Oxymoron ?
*hic*
Oh swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/
In the picture in the catalog it is positioned exactly where one would
expect to find a vertical shutter release. So perhaps this picture also
includes the NiCad Pack too.
--
Nick Wright
http://www.wrightfoto.com/
--
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Until I can buy one in BH, it's as much a product as a cruise trip to
Pluto is.
Now just a cotton-pickin minute there Bruce, wanna see my holiday snaps!?
*hic*
Oh swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
It exist allright. How good it is I don't know. It flares though and it
isn't multicoated at all! It is about as multicoated as your average Coke
bottle.
There are people who believed flare control had little to do with
multicoating, but lens design (I think that's what Canon said). There are
Thanks for the kind comment Martin,
William in Utah.
10/1/2002 7:37:39 AM, Martin Mielke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've never commented on PUG images before, mainly for two reasons. 1) I
admit to feeling self conscious after seeing so many great images month
after month. 2) I hate picking
Stop being boring and go out and sail a boat ;-)
Sorry, couldn't resist!
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 October 2002 23:13
To: Pentax List
Subject: Re: Photokina and Pentax - the future?
I think Jerome raises some interesting points, but I
Hmmm. I don't know what exactly you are shooting, but I have found, for myself,
that shooting with a prime is quicker (if that is important) than using a zoom because
of
there is one less control to deal with. I have had various 70-210 ish zooms and found
that generally a plain 135 is
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 22:21, Alan Chan wrote:
Say, Peter?
You are going to Japan are you not. Gee you could be the PDML
distributor or the Sharon camera!!!
Maybe we could open our own online shop and import stuffs from Japan
directly. :)
regards,
Alan Chan
Peter already is
on 10/01/02 12:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes that's nice, and I believe you, but...
WHAT ABOUT THE FOOT POWDER?
Cameron
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:00:11 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E5l_Jensen?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pentax at Photokina
Pål, is this real? Do you have any more on this?
We need to hire a paparazzi to spy on any new Pentax products. :)
regards,
Alan Chan
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
