On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 01:02:19PM -0500, Bob Shell wrote:
On Jan 13, 2007, at 12:56 PM, Bob Shell wrote:
On Jan 13, 2007, at 12:44 PM, mike wilson wrote:
126 format, I believe. Came in a cassette, like 110. My first
camera, an Agfamatic given to me when I was about 8, used this.
John Francis wrote:
Wikipedia is really getting to be useful nowadays.
It shows up in the top two or three sites on a lot
of my Google queries.
Just stay away from socio-political commentary, though.
I'd have to agree. Whenever a fact or explanation of technology or
otherwise non-human
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino Subject: OT: What Film Format Is This?
My sister in law asked me to scan some old 35mm slides, which of course
is no problem. But I wasn't expecting 35 mm _square_ exposures:
http://www.markcassino.com/temp/IMGP2607.jpg
That's a modern
On Jan 13, 2007, at 2:08 PM, William Robb wrote:
It's called a Super Slide. I believe it is 127 format.
Correct. It is 127 . Image about 40 X 40 mm. Probably shot with a
Baby Rollei or Baby Yashica TLR. Even possibly a VP Exakta.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
That is not 35mm, it is 127 slide film (sometimes called super slides
because it would fit in a 2x2 mount).
-graywolf
Mark Cassino wrote:
My sister in law asked me to scan some old 35mm slides, which of course
is no problem. But I wasn't expecting 35 mm _square_ exposures:
That's 127 format. Common to lots of inexpensive cameras of the
fifties. I had a
Brownie Starflash that shot 127, so I have several boxes of the
slides myself.
Paul
On Jan 13, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Mark Cassino wrote:
My sister in law asked me to scan some old 35mm slides, which of
course
It works for me. I don't think it is a everlasting photo, but it makes me
curious.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: 13. januar 2007 14:01
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Thanks for the replies.
However, I know nothing of DOS commands, and have no
desire to learn them.
I also do not know what the Windows root directory
is. Is that the C drive? Assuming so, I put
showtags.exe and the image file there, and used run
from the Start menu, with filename.out added to
Boris, I guess I'd put this down to a nice attempt. But it's like, I've
seen it before.
Boris Liberman wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16194full=1
Feeling rather abstract I am ;-).
Please be brutal but honest.
Boris
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my
I was taught to put the other hand at the other end of the lens-camera
combination, to help counterbalance.
Not necessary with a properly set up gimbaled mount. Balance becomes a non
issue.
But I use my free arm or coat to help damp the lens/camera body combo.
Kenneth Waller
- Original
Hi Charles. This was hard to capture because even though the comet was very
bright, it was also in relatively bright skies even after the sun set. I've
got one or two photos I'll show. I'm not thrilled with them either.
So not bad overall.
Tom C.
From: Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been trying to see the comet, let alone photograph it for 5 days,
(low clouds to the west, or worse, every single day, and tonight it's
raining). I hate you..
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jan 12, 2007, at 22:34, Charles Robinson wrote:
2.5 meg JPEG linked below - large file, sorry.
I would expect that a professional, would correct that in processing,
(especially in sales sample of their work.).
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Jan,
When your shooting 500 shots per day, each and every day, some will be
a bit out of alignment.
Regards, Bob S.
On 1/13/07, Jan van Wijk [EMAIL
Oh, God why did I have to look...
Cotty wrote:
On 13/1/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
He'll need a lot of glaze to cover this cheeta like physic.LOL
Ken's a daddy.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/ryan/index.htm
Check out the last pic - he's blobbed out the kid's
Trying to be brutally honest - I like it Boris. Nicely done.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Rain
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16194full=1
Feeling rather abstract I am ;-).
Please be brutal but honest.
BTW you've got dust on your sensor.
Yeah, and THAT is after editing a bunch off! f/16 and a dirty sensor
makes for a real mess of dust bunnies showing up.
I normally view the final image @ 100%, looking imperfections.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Charles Robinson
My procedure also.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Something is wrong (with my K10D)
On 13/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
When I bought my K10D I also bought a TwinMOS 1GB 150x memory card. The
first one broke
It's a console app. You have to open a 'DOS' box and run it from
there. The run command from the start menu won't allow you to read the
output. You could redirect output to a text file on the command line
then use notepad or wordpad to read the resulting ASCII file..
Rick Womer wrote:
It's nothing to do with Windows.
The Mac version will probably be a command-line (shell)
program, and will need to be run from a command prompt,
just like the Windows version, and just like the version
for Linux.
If you're not happy with command-line utilities, and
expect everything to run with
He'll need a lot of glaze to cover this cheeta like physic.LOL
Ken's a daddy.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/ryan/index.htm
Check out the last pic - he's blobbed out the kid's dick. Good ol
Ken.
Perhaps that's the way Rockwells are made!
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I left work around 4:00 PM yesterday. Zipped to the local department store
to pick up a cheap pair of binoculars and a compass (I hate when I forget
things at home).
My goal was to find an unimpeded view of the south-south-west horizon. I
started driving to the local ski area above Boise. As
... I finally decided that the DA70/2.4 Limited was a better pick for
me than the FA77/1.8 Limited. The shorter focal length and QuickShift
focus are what have drawn me this way, coupled with an extensive
array of photos that compared them in which I decided that, aside
from focal length
I think you're looking at 127 photo size is roughly 40x40mm or 1.5x1.5
the slides will fit in a 35mm projector. but you'll probably have
trouble scanning them in a film scanner that will only scan 35mm film or
smaller..
Mark Cassino wrote:
My sister in law asked me to scan some old 35mm
Nice and atmospheric. Looks like a rain forest.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Sent: 13 January 2007 17:59
To: PDML
Subject: PESO - Trees in Fog
More an experiment in framing and lighting than anything
Close 126 produces a slide thats square but only a couple of mm larger
than the short side of a 35mm frame 28x28mm maybe. This is most like
127 film.
mike wilson wrote:
126 format, I believe. Came in a cassette, like 110. My first camera, an
Agfamatic given to me when I was about 8, used
I've been calibrating to gamma 1.8, although I have profiles for
gamma 2.2 as well. I find that gamma 1.8 gives more consistent
rendering quality between print and screen when doing BW, for color
work the difference seems insignificant.
G
On Jan 12, 2007, at 6:44 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Ken told me to stand still and look interesting.:-)
No Dave, I told you to look interested.
;+}
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Holden Efi jy @ N A I A S
Ken
I like it, not an award winner, and I've seen a lot like it, but as
usual your eye wins out.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
More an experiment in framing and lighting than anything else, still, I am
intrigued by this one to some degree. Comments and suggestions welcome.
It's a strong image with the diagonals and contrast overlaid by the rain
spatters. Subjectively, not my cup of tea, but I can see why others might
like it. The image may be more likely to work in a group of rain themed
images than alone... just my opinion.
Thanks.
Tom C.
From: Boris
Looks like the K10D brought back something very Pentax - the MTF - or
Modulation Transfer Factor.
The excellent DCWatch Longterm Test #5 covers this in detail with
many example images taken with the DA 40, FA 43, and DA 16-45 mm lenses.
Here's a tongue in cheek tribute to you snowflake shooters:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/126/356142776_a84a0aa91b_o.jpg
Pentax *istDs, SMC A100/2.8 Macro, f8.0 @ 1/45 (handheld), ISO 200, +.5EV
Enjoy,
Mark
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Maybe they never left.
Walter Hamler wrote:
The Robins are back early this year. They must have heard about all the warm
weather up north!
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/BirdsofaFeatherweb.jpg
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
Then the image would be half the size of a normal 35mm image.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT: What Film Format Is This?
Olympus (and, I presume, others) made a 1/2 frame 35mm format. Perhaps
that's what you've got.
He lives in SF. It is a rain forest...
Bob W wrote:
Nice and atmospheric. Looks like a rain forest.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Sent: 13 January 2007 17:59
To: PDML
Subject: PESO - Trees in
Tried to upload to the February Pug today, and
received an error message. Anyone else encountered
that?
As a reminder, the theme for February is duett, and
the deadline is one week away.
Harald
Expecting?
Where's the emesis basin? Disgusting.
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - Very Professnial !
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:41:06 -0500
Oh, God why did I have to look...
Cotty
Argg.
I would have taken that off your hands.
Not sure when the one i ordered will even arive.
Dave
Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
... I finally decided that the DA70/2.4 Limited was a better pick for
me than the FA77/1.8 Limited. The shorter focal length and QuickShift
focus
On 1/12/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the Spyder 1? bought from MR, and i, being a real chicken have
yet to install this, as, basically, i'm afraid i'll screw somthing up.
Very easy. For the quick-and-easy way to use the Spyder 1, download
the latest version of PhotoCal
Oh, sorry.:-)
I forgot to comment on thr photos.
I like em
Dave
Quoting Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ken told me to stand still and look interesting.:-)
No Dave, I told you to look interested.
;+}
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My first PAW for 2007, i think:-).
This is a BW working for the shot i took a few days ago, that has the
colour aliasing.
K10D, Polorizer filter, 16-45 F4. Channels mixer in PS, then black
point, white point and medium point set by curves eye droppers.
Channel Mixer was something like:
R=72
On Jan 13, 2007, at 14:42, Tom C wrote:
It was very cold, around 13F. There was only about 1/2 hour of
time from
when the comet became easily visible, between sunset and the
setting of the
comet. Fingers so numb I couldn't feel the dials on the camera.
Fingertips
still hurt four
Yes, a similar blight is being repeated all across the country! What we need
is less people!!!
Seriously, nice rendition. I find myself converting a lot of my shots to BW
just to see what it may look like. The new PS Elements 5 has a nice BW
conversion that lets you play with different
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:58:34PM +0100, Bertil Holmberg wrote:
Looks like the K10D brought back something very Pentax - the MTF - or
Modulation Transfer Factor.
The excellent DCWatch Longterm Test #5 covers this in detail with
many example images taken with the DA 40, FA 43, and DA
Dave,
Nice composition and it looks like a good conversion. Poignant title
matches picture well.
Tom C.
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PAW Forced out
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:28:14 -0500
My first PAW for
Godders offered it here. I considered it, but I'll probably go for
the DA 70. May sell my K 85/1.8 first. Then again, I might not:-).
Paul
On Jan 13, 2007, at 6:31 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Argg.
I would have taken that off your hands.
Not sure when the one i ordered will even arive.
Must have missed that or just forgot.
Oh well.
I;ll wait.:-)
Dave
Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Godders offered it here. I considered it, but I'll probably go for
the DA 70. May sell my K 85/1.8 first. Then again, I might not:-).
Paul
On Jan 13, 2007, at 6:31 PM, David J
There have been quite a few obsolete formats. Remember APS film
cameras? Soon be able to add th and the digital equivalent APS-C to
the Wikipedia lists together with the DA lenses!!
Peter
Full frame Pentax Lenses a speciality
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Excellent shot. The polarizer worked will to give you good sky
detail. Nice.
Paul
On Jan 13, 2007, at 4:43 PM, Tom C wrote:
Dave,
Nice composition and it looks like a good conversion. Poignant title
matches picture well.
Tom C.
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
In your dreams. Three new DA* lenses coming this year.
Paul
On Jan 13, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Peter Fairweather wrote:
There have been quite a few obsolete formats. Remember APS film
cameras? Soon be able to add th and the digital equivalent APS-C to
the Wikipedia lists together with the DA
Cool shot.
Like the blue and silver colurs.
Dave
Quoting Mark Dalal [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Here's a tongue in cheek tribute to you snowflake shooters:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/126/356142776_a84a0aa91b_o.jpg
Pentax *istDs, SMC A100/2.8 Macro, f8.0 @ 1/45 (handheld), ISO 200, +.5EV
Yes, I offered it here a couple of weeks ago but no one made any
inquiry. I hadn't really offered it as a for sale item on DPReview,
just mentioned that I had the FA77 but would prefer the DA70 if I
could get my money out of the FA77 ... within five minutes, six
people emailed me wanting
What's the current market prices of theses lenses? Seems like the 77mmFA
should
be more expensive than a DA70mm condsidering its half stop faster
and can also cover FF too.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist
Sent: Saturday,
At 10:34 PM -0600 1/12/07, Charles Robinson wrote:
So...
We finally got a clear sky here in Minneapolis.
It was 7 degrees F outside. Brr.
The sun set at 4:56 and I finally spotted the darned comet at 5:12!
Coldd outside. Did I mention that??
I had the DS on a tripod, and the
Actually, Peter, I don't live in San Francisco. I live across the San
Francisco Bay, in what is affectionately called the East Bay Hills. Often
a totally different climate. FWIW, many of the homes in the East Bay Hills
- in the Oakland area especially - were built as summer cottages by San
You did not explicitly ask for comments, but I'll risk it anyway.
The birds themselves are well captured, but they need to stand out more from
the background.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Thank you Peter
Shel
[Original Message]
From: P. J. Alling
I like it, not an award winner, and I've seen
a lot like it, but as usual your eye wins out.
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/treesinfog.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi Bob ... thanks a lot. Glad someone liked it enough to comment ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob W
Nice and atmospheric. Looks like a rain forest.
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/treesinfog.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Jan 13, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Mark Cassino wrote:
I've always taken the same approach - but my X's Drive II started
having
problems reading the 2 gig SD cards used in the K10D.
The drive's manual said to make sure the cards were formatted
before use
to avoid the error I was getting. So
Thanks for clarifying that.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Actually, Peter, I don't live in San Francisco. I live across the San
Francisco Bay, in what is affectionately called the East Bay Hills. Often
a totally different climate. FWIW, many of the homes in the East Bay Hills
- in the Oakland area
... I finally decided that the DA70/2.4 Limited was a better pick for
me than the FA77/1.8 Limited.
-
I have both and will keep both. It's ecological niche separation. My FA
77 is part of my normal kit, while the DA limiteds are for when I travel
with a compact kit.
Comments about this
The sun finally popped out for a bit late this afternoon, so i put the
K10D on the tripod and tested out some Custom WB's.
I could not get a WB at normal shutters so i tried longer exposures.
Got a decent WB at 10-13 F4 iso 320, r72 on, shooting sunny green grass.
Test shots show a yellowish
I like this too. Is it really a snowflake? The slight melting makes
it a pretty pioture.
Paul
On Jan 13, 2007, at 7:06 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Cool shot.
Like the blue and silver colurs.
Dave
Quoting Mark Dalal [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Here's a tongue in cheek tribute to you snowflake
On Jan 13, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
I have both and will keep both. It's ecological niche separation.
My FA
77 is part of my normal kit, while the DA limiteds are for when I
travel
with a compact kit.
Comments about this being irrational are unnecessary. I already know
Yes, it is a totally different climate, isn't it? I remember working
in San Francisco in July when it was 65 degrees during the day and 40
at night with constant light rain. Across the bay it was 80 in the
daytime and 65 at night. I've heard that the warmest months in San
Francisco are
On Jan 13, 2007, at 4:37 PM, John Francis wrote:
The MTF is a measure of the resolving power (or sharpness) of the
lens,
and is dependent on aperture.
Not really. MTF stands for Modulation Transfer Function. This is an
expression of how accurately a lens transmits modulation, which is
A fun shot, perhaps a bit oversaturated. I might tone down the color
a bit. But almost humorous in the way the birds are congregating.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Walter Hamler
Sent: 13. januar 2007 19:18
To:
At 1:25 PM -0700 1/13/07, Tom C wrote:
Hi Charles. This was hard to capture because even though the comet was very
bright, it was also in relatively bright skies even after the sun set. I've
got one or two photos I'll show. I'm not thrilled with them either.
So not bad overall.
It is now
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:00:34PM -0500, John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:25:41PM -0500, Mat Maessen wrote:
On 1/12/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone has a DS2, K100D or K110D, I'd like to know what
value is stored in the PentaxModelID tag (TagType 5).
I've become more skeptical of off-brand cards with the K10D. I never
had a problem with CF cards in the *istD, using a number of low buck
cards. With the K10D and SD cards, I had an early failure with a
Transcend 2 gig, 150X card, and Boris seems to be having some
problems with another
On 1/13/07 5:16 PM, Tim Øsleby, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The birds themselves are well captured, but they need to stand out more from
the background.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/BirdsofaFeatherweb.jpg
Did you mean DOF was not shallow enough, or the background is too
Boris Liberman wrote:
John Francis wrote:
Wikipedia is really getting to be useful nowadays.
It shows up in the top two or three sites on a lot
of my Google queries.
Just stay away from socio-political commentary, though.
I'd have to agree. Whenever a fact or explanation of technology or
On Jan 13, 2007, at 2:05 AM, Cotty wrote:
Is this half as cool as it looks?
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-7901-8687
Looks gimmicky to me. The best bags IMO are the simplest, most hard-
wearing with the least amount of bits of black strap dangling
everywhere. Even
Another one from yesterday. The one thing disappointing about this comet,
even though instrinsically bright, is that it was seemingly difficult to
capture a lot of detail in the tail.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5448879
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I like the way birds are standing out (almost like Limited lens quality)
but one guy is turning his back (or axx) to me which bothers me a bit :-).
Ken
Yes, well I guess birds are allowed to moon us as well :-)
Waly
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 14/01/07, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone would be a fool to agree to that.
Thanks Bob, I use it but I certainly don't use it to host any images
that I wouldn't be prepared to loose (nor would any be potentially
attractive to the for that matter). Fact is if you make anything
[Original Message]
From: Mark Cassino
My sister in law asked me to scan some old 35mm slides, which of
course is no problem. But I wasn't expecting 35 mm _square_ exposures:
http://www.markcassino.com/temp/IMGP2607.jpg
That's a modern 35mm exposure on the right.
I think it's 127
On 1/13/07 5:46 PM, Walter Hamler, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, well I guess birds are allowed to moon us as well :-)
Yes, that's exactly the word!
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
We need Bill or Ken to shoot it with their 600s and 2X converters.
Come on guys. We need you. (If it clears up in Michigan, I'll give it
a try with a 400 and 2X. But this looks like a 1200mm shot to me.
Paul
On Jan 13, 2007, at 5:42 PM, Tom C wrote:
Another one from yesterday. The one
On 14/01/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken's a daddy.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/ryan/index.htm
Check out the last pic - he's blobbed out the kid's dick. Good ol Ken.
Poor little bugger.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This might be the last day anyone in the N. hemisphere (mid to northern
latitudes) will see it. Best opportunities are sunset and the next 30
minutes.
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
On 14/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've become more skeptical of off-brand cards with the K10D. I never
had a problem with CF cards in the *istD, using a number of low buck
cards.
The topology of the interfaces of the cards make CF far more reliable
from a technical
By the way, I like this pic. A simple shot, well composed and well
executed.
Paul
On Jan 13, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yes, it is a totally different climate, isn't it? I remember working
in San Francisco in July when it was 65 degrees during the day and 40
at night with
On 1/13/07, Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My sister in law asked me to scan some old 35mm slides, which of course
is no problem. But I wasn't expecting 35 mm _square_ exposures:
http://www.markcassino.com/temp/IMGP2607.jpg
That's a modern 35mm exposure on the right.
She also had
Rick Womer wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
However, I know nothing of DOS commands, and have no
desire to learn them.
I also do not know what the Windows root directory
is. Is that the C drive? Assuming so, I put
showtags.exe and the image file there, and used run
from the Start menu,
Peter Fairweather wrote:
There have been quite a few obsolete formats. Remember APS film
cameras? Soon be able to add th and the digital equivalent APS-C to
the Wikipedia lists together with the DA lenses!!
APS is the only film on show in the camera shop in the biggest indoor
mall in the
Make that there are probably some better deals out there.
Gawd, I hate it when I sound like a nincompoop:-).
Paul
On Jan 13, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I've become more skeptical of off-brand cards with the K10D. I never
had a problem with CF cards in the *istD, using a number of
Make that there are probably some better deals out there.
Gawd, I hate it when I sound like a nincompoop:-).
Paul
On Jan 13, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I've become more skeptical of off-brand cards with the K10D. I never
had a problem with CF cards in the *istD, using a number of
John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:00:34PM -0500, John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:25:41PM -0500, Mat Maessen wrote:
On 1/12/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone has a DS2, K100D or K110D, I'd like to know what
value is stored in the PentaxModelID tag
Why not use a site where you're at least minimally protected?
Photo.net makes it clear that the photographer is the owner of the
copyright. And it's faster.
Paul
On Jan 13, 2007, at 5:59 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 14/01/07, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone would be a fool
It's 127 format - don't know about other manufacturers, but Kodak made
slide film in that format for a period of time. When mounted, they
called them *superslides*. Image size is about 38mm x 38mm.
-P
Mark Cassino wrote:
My sister in law asked me to scan some old 35mm slides, which of
So I've seen.
Paul
On Jan 13, 2007, at 6:16 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 14/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've become more skeptical of off-brand cards with the K10D. I never
had a problem with CF cards in the *istD, using a number of low buck
cards.
The topology of
Was the Tokina a mirror lens? Wasn't able to see the comet because of
clouds in my area. Now, I understand, you have to travel to the
southern hemisphere to see it.
Jim A.
I left work around 4:00 PM yesterday. Zipped to the local department store
to pick up a cheap pair of binoculars and
Well you guys came up with some great captions for this shot - very
witty - I think my favourites are Paul's lost trousers, Bob W's lost
Englishmen, and Stan's aperture simulator sighting!I can now
reveal the real answer - Ken was on the right track - this is New
Zealand's famous hotwater
127 roll film slide, a.k.a. superslide. I had a gray Baby Rolleiflex
that took 127 size film. I loved the large slides you could get from
Ektachrome 127 film. You could load the 2X2 size mounts in a slide
projector and get the most amazing image on a screen. At some gift shops,
say, in
Hi Jim,
Yes it's a mirror lens. Does a decent job overall. A fair amount of
atmospheric haze to shoot through yesterday.
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Comet McNaught
Date: Sat,
On 14/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not use a site where you're at least minimally protected?
Photo.net makes it clear that the photographer is the owner of the
copyright. And it's faster.
Because Photo.net so slow it's ridiculous here and it's very limited
if you don't
On Jan 13, 2007, at 6:33 PM, mike wilson wrote:
There have been quite a few obsolete formats. Remember APS film
cameras? Soon be able to add th and the digital equivalent APS-C to
the Wikipedia lists together with the DA lenses!!
APS is the only film on show in the camera shop in the
Yes it's a mirror lens. Does a decent job overall. A fair amount of
atmospheric haze to shoot through yesterday.
Apparantly you do not have any difficulty mounting a mirror lens on the
istD. I have seen on other groups where folks cannon mount the mirror lenses
on the DS, DL, K100, K10
On 14/01/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jim,
Yes it's a mirror lens. Does a decent job overall. A fair amount of
atmospheric haze to shoot through yesterday.
You don't have a K-mount for your big bazooka yet? ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)
Not my kind of image.
But I like it in the context you're presenting it - Urban removal. As a
stand alone image, I much prefer not to view the background houses. I do
like the positioning of the barn the amount of foreground those great
clouds.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
101 - 200 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
