At www.Photodo.com one can read:
Manufacturer's Description: The unique smc P-FA zoom 250-600mm F5.6 lens
provides a moderately long zoom to extremely long zoom range. It features a
fixed aperture setting of 5.6 throughout the zoom range and uses a 43mm rear
filter. An internal focusing system
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:29:17 +, Peter Lacus wrote
John,
I own just the M200/4 and the A70-210/4 and generally I concur with
your findings. Nevertheless my sample of M200/4 shows some chromatic
aberration on film (haven't tried it on digital yet).
Never really noticed CA in any of
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:55:34 -0500, J. C. O'Connell wrote
I tried a SMCK 45-125/4.0 zoom for the
first time today on my istDS. I really
like the zoom range on APS, feels like a
good ol' 70/80-200/210 on 35mm (actually its about 68-188 equiv).
The 45mm focal length on the
short end is very
Super Dooper Mojo
On 01/03/07, Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Silent Deadly Microwave
On Feb 28, 2007, at 6:53 PM, John Celio wrote:
From: John Whittingham
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:09:23 +, Eric Featherstone wrote
On 28/02/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28/2/07, Jens
Lunar eclipse 11.20pm in the UK on the evening of 3rd march.
http://www.eclipse.org.uk/eclipse/1112007/
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Another nice PUG, there. I don't have time to comment on the individual
photos right now, though.
I just thought I might mention that my entry in Open Gallery was
actually intended for the themed section - because it's a picture that
I thought came out as looking essentially black and white,
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/03/01 Thu AM 08:32:48 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Pentax FA*250-600/5.6 - Anyone Enabled?
At www.Photodo.com one can read:
Manufacturer's Description: The unique smc P-FA zoom 250-600mm F5.6 lens
provides a
Hi,
Has anyone got any recommendations for a hood for the K30/2.8?
Thanks,
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:38:51 -0800 (PST), Rick Womer wrote:
What a great gallery!
Indeed!
One of the things I love about the PUG is that most of
the photos are from people who never post on the PDML.
It would be fun to hear from them here.
He, I speak up once in a while ...
Am just a quiet
Fabulous gallery. Well done to all contributors, they're all extremely
good. Some that stood out for me:
Goalkeeper by Gabor Ritz
Wood and Rock by Steve Sharpe - that's superb.
Running in the Rain by Boris Liberman
Waiting for Summer by Paul Stenquist
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
John Francis owns the FA* 250-600/5.6.. He's done excellent work with
it and an *istD. I believe his amazing shot of the race car that
appears to be headed for a city street at the Long Beach Grand Prix was
shot with that lens on the D. Ditto some of his airplane shots. I see
no reason why it
Thanks Cotty. Much appreciated.
Paul
On Mar 1, 2007, at 7:21 AM, Cotty wrote:
Fabulous gallery. Well done to all contributors, they're all extremely
good. Some that stood out for me:
Goalkeeper by Gabor Ritz
Wood and Rock by Steve Sharpe - that's superb.
Running in the Rain by Boris
Hi Toralf,
Not to worry, I sort of interpreted your photo that way. That's
because I was thinking in that mode as well.
Again your shot is something I wish I can take. No snow where I come from...
Bong
On 3/1/07, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another nice PUG, there. I don't have
Thanks, Cotty! It was an excellent gallery all around.
At 12:21 PM + 3/1/07, Cotty wrote:
Fabulous gallery. Well done to all contributors, they're all extremely
good. Some that stood out for me:
Goalkeeper by Gabor Ritz
Wood and Rock by Steve Sharpe - that's superb.
Running in the Rain by
Thanks! Well, I used one of my PESOs, so I kinda cheated though...
On 3/1/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabulous gallery. Well done to all contributors, they're all extremely
good. Some that stood out for me:
Goalkeeper by Gabor Ritz
Wood and Rock by Steve Sharpe - that's superb.
On 1/3/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks! Well, I used one of my PESOs, so I kinda cheated though...
Nonesense. Market research ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
The color version definitely works better for me.
Dan M
On 2/28/07, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 28, 2007, at 20:22, Walter Hamler wrote:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/GirraffeBWweb.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/
Very Nice!
On 2/27/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An abstract of nature. It's a frozen over section of More's Creek. The
picture was taken from (guessing) 175 feet above the surface.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5654453
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Goalkeeper, by Gabor Ritz was my favorite of the month. It is a
striking shot with a strong sense of mood. I also like the
composition very much. The void in the outline of the leaves reflects
the shape of the figure and the goal, and the high contrast in the
leaves highlights the low contrast
What a lovely portrait!
On 2/27/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Taken in Denali National Park, Alaska during a fall snowstorm with *ist D,
600mm f4.0 FA 1.4X-L convertor on Gitzo 1548 tripod with Kirk King
Excellent, Marcus. It brings back fond memories of the day we spent
with you in Zurich in the summer of 2005.
Dan M
On 2/27/07, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pentaxians
I do not find the time to read all the messages on the PDML but take a lot
of photographs nearly every day.
Hey, this is the same guy that made that horrible film about the
Titanic, isn't it?
FDan M
On 2/26/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it seems somone finally found the grave of Jesus Christ - and his son.
This must be something to photograph. Imageine being the first photographer
to
So do I!
Dan M
Nothing remarkable, but I like the reflections.
http://www.avocadohead.com/piclinks/IMGP2523.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Last week I was in Dallas, visiting my college room mate. His wife,
Laura Wilson, is an accomplished photographer, and wrote a very
interesting book about working with Richard Avedon in making his book
In the American West. Her book, Avedon at Work: In the American
West, might be of interest to
Quite graceful!
Dan M
On 2/26/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott, it works as it is now.
I however suggest that you consider alternative macro lenses, because
the shorter the focal length - the closer the object has to be to the
front element of the lens, which is not always
Wasn't this lens originally designed for baseball?
Don't know. It certainly looks like you could use it as a bat...
Jens Bladt wrote:
At www.Photodo.com one can read:
Manufacturer's Description: The unique smc P-FA zoom 250-600mm F5.6 lens
provides a moderately long zoom to extremely long
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Hey, this is the same guy that made that horrible film about the
Titanic, isn't it?
I didn't know Jesus made any films at all! Are they available on DVD?
;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Mar 1, 2007, at 6:50 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Last week I was in Dallas, visiting my college room mate. His wife,
Laura Wilson, is an accomplished photographer, and wrote a very
interesting book about working with Richard Avedon in making his book
In the American West. Her book,
Have to say, this latest gallery is one of the best I've seen to
date. Congrats to all contributors.
G
On Mar 1, 2007, at 4:21 AM, Cotty wrote:
Fabulous gallery. Well done to all contributors, they're all extremely
good. Some that stood out for me:
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I never noticed enough flare with mine to use one. I assume you're
using yours on digital. I'd go with the one recommended for the smc
85mm f1.8 the PH-R52. I tried that combination a couple of times on the
*ist D and it didn't seem to vignette.
Paul wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone got any
Yes, you are of course right, Mike. What they mean is that the
aperture doesn't change, wile zooming.
But that's not exactly what it says, at Photodo.com :-(.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Latest photographs: http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype:
I wouldn't say horrible, execrable is more like it.
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Hey, this is the same guy that made that horrible film about the
Titanic, isn't it?
FDan M
On 2/26/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it seems somone finally found the grave of Jesus Christ - and his
There's an interesting rumour thread over at APUG, it seems that Carl
Zeiss may be expanding their new line of 35mm lenses to include a ZK
line, with an announcement supposedly at PMA.
This would be interesting, as it would mean that there would be a
readily available 85/1.4 in K mount again,
On Mar 1, 2007, at 3:55 AM, Paul wrote:
Has anyone got any recommendations for a hood for the K30/2.8?
If you're using it on a Pentax DSLR, any standard screw-in hood for a
50mm normal from film SLRs will do just fine. I use either B+W or
Kalt screw-in metal lens hoods, they work well and
I dont mind the fence.:-), and a great shot BTW
Dave (split rail fence guy) Brooks
On 2/26/07, Russell Kerstetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, it is barbed wire. I guess I have a thing for fences, maybe next
time I will take different shots with and without the fence. Thanks
for your
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: OT: The tomb of Jesus
I wouldn't say horrible, execrable is more like it.
He did make gobs of money off it, and IIRC, won a few Academy Awards.
I didn't see the movie, but I would surmise that we are in the minority
based on it's
I have a photo and credit on page E9 of today's NY Times. That's in the
Thursday Style section. It's probably the weakest of all the shots I
took at the exercise class the other night. But that's because the
photo desk gave me bad information. I had only two hours to get ready
for the shoot,
Jan van Wijk wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:38:51 -0800 (PST), Rick Womer wrote:
What a great gallery!
Indeed!
One of the things I love about the PUG is that most of
the photos are from people who never post on the PDML.
It would be fun to hear from them here.
He, I speak up once in
I was up last Saturday at Napa for a non-photography reason. Very white sky
day, overcast and foggy and drizzly. I prefer to keep my equipment dry, but
on the way out of town the rain stopped for a while. So I pulled over down a
private road toward a vineyard and took some shots. I didn't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/row.htm
I like it. Nice composition. Looks very serene.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Nicely done although I'd also like to see the color version.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - All In A Row
I was up last Saturday at Napa for a non-photography reason. Very white
sky
day, overcast and foggy and drizzly. I prefer to keep
In a message dated 3/1/2007 6:40:27 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2/26/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it seems somone finally found the grave of Jesus Christ - and his son.
This must be something to photograph. Imageine being the first photographer
In a message dated 3/1/2007 8:58:53 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nicely done although I'd also like to see the color version.
Kenneth Waller
=
I sort of liked the color version, myself, so I may show that too.
Thanks, Ken.
Marnie aka Doe
In a message dated 3/1/2007 9:01:41 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/row.htm
I like it. Nice composition. Looks very serene.
===
Thanks, Christian.
Marnie aka Doe
I guess I should elaborate a little on this lens (SMCK45-125/4)as some
others
are suggesting replacements that dont make sense in the context
of what I think the lens's best purpose. I dont believe you can
get high quality, reasonably fast, constant aperture zooms
that are going to cover the
Marnie,
Nicely seen! Like it.
Am going to pick a couple of knits, one of which you may not be able to
do anything about.
Not simply because it's often quoted as a compositional rule, but
because it gave me a slight negative nudge. The horizon is
uncomfortably close to mid image. I would definitely
From:
Paul Stenquist
I have a photo and credit on page E9 of today's NY Times.
So what does the NYT pay single photos like that? And did you get credit?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 1/3/07, skye, discombobulated, unleashed:
Looks great! I saw it online. Congrats :)
Anyone got a link?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
He did make gobs of money off it, and IIRC, won a few Academy Awards.
I didn't see the movie, but I would surmise that we are in the minority
based on it's market performance.
I didn't see it either. First I don't like DiCaprio, second there was such a
big build up to it that I was turned off,
Looks great! I saw it online. Congrats :)
--skye
On 3/1/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a photo and credit on page E9 of today's NY Times. That's in the
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks Dan and Marnie.
Tom C.
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Winter Thaw
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:07:01 -0500
Very Nice!
On 2/27/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An
In a message dated 3/1/2007 8:58:53 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nicely done although I'd also like to see the color version.
Kenneth Waller
=
Okay, here it is in color, Ken. I must admit I couldn't quite decide between
the BW and color.
I was initially
In a message dated 3/1/2007 9:28:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie,
Nicely seen! Like it.
Am going to pick a couple of knits, one of which you may not be able to
do anything about.
Not simply because it's often quoted as a compositional rule, but
because it gave
Hi Gang,
I've resubscribed to the list for a while, mainly to see if you're all
behaving yourselves. From the archives it seems that you are. I guess
having a major disruptive force like myself off the list has been a good
thing ;-))
Anyway, I've received a number of emails inquiring about my
Here you go!
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/01/fashion/01Fitness.html?_r=1oref=slogin
http://tinyurl.com/2av2m5
Scroll about halfway down for Paul's photo
-P
Cotty wrote:
On 1/3/07, skye, discombobulated, unleashed:
Looks great! I saw it online. Congrats :)
Anyone got a link?
--
Congrats ... I was unable to find it online, can you point to where
it might be?
G
On Mar 1, 2007, at 8:12 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I have a photo and credit on page E9 of today's NY Times. That's in
the
Thursday Style section. It's probably the weakest of all the shots I
took at the
On 3/1/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/3/07, skye, discombobulated, unleashed:
Looks great! I saw it online. Congrats :)
Anyone got a link?
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/01/fashion/01Fitness.html
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
Shoot more film!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
I like the color version better - it gives me more info than the B+W.
Take this from where it comes as I'm not much of a fan of B+W in general.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - All In A Row
In a message dated 3/1/2007 8:58:53 A.M.
On Mar 1, 2007, at 10:01 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
On 3/1/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/3/07, skye, discombobulated, unleashed:
Looks great! I saw it online. Congrats :)
Anyone got a link?
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/01/fashion/01Fitness.html
Thanks Scott!
G
--
PDML
I get a credit line that reads Paul Stenquist for the New York Times.
I believe the pay is $150. Not much, but better than nothing.
Paul
On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:22 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From:
Paul Stenquist
I have a photo and credit on page E9 of today's NY Times.
So what does the NYT pay
Some brief PUG comments from me...
I thought it was an outstanding gallery, but my time is limited so some
brief comments on the ones that jumped out at me...
Trees and Hills -- Harald Rust
No surprise I liked this one, I usually love Harald's stuff. And he wisely
never seems to post
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I get a credit line that reads Paul Stenquist for the New York Times.
I believe the pay is $150. Not much, but better than nothing.
Paul
http://tinyurl.com/2av2m5
That's great, Paul. Congrats.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
I like the Nikon HN-3 hood for mine. Screw in, sturdy
metal. I'm still a film guy with pentax tho', so if
you don't need full frame coverage you might want to
work elsewhere.
William in Utah
--- Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone got any recommendations for a hood for
the
Don't do that to me. $2995 is more than I can afford but not too much
that I can convince myself it's way too expensive.
For me it needs to be half that price (so I can buy one) or $10,000 (so
I know I can never afford one).
Peter
Stan Halpin wrote:
BTW, I am expecting the 645D to come in at
Good news. We missed you.
Paul
On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:37 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Gang,
I've resubscribed to the list for a while, mainly to see if you're all
behaving yourselves. From the archives it seems that you are. I guess
having a major disruptive force like myself off the list
You guys are good! I had no idea if it was online or where it might be.
In newsprint it's not as saturated or blocky and quite a bit larger,
but I'm pleased that it's on the web. Thanks to all for the responses.
Paul
On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
Here you go!
Saw that rumour too.
I'd be a great news for Pentax if only because a brand with such
recognition offers support for Pentax bodies.
I hope it is true but I won't hold my breath on this one.
2007/3/1, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There's an interesting rumour thread over at APUG, it seems that
Um, I mean look elsewhere.
W.
--- William Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the Nikon HN-3 hood for mine. Screw in,
sturdy
metal. I'm still a film guy with pentax tho', so if
you don't need full frame coverage you might want to
work elsewhere.
William in Utah
--- Paul [EMAIL
In a message dated 3/1/2007 10:43:19 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like the color version better - it gives me more info than the B+W.
Take this from where it comes as I'm not much of a fan of B+W in general.
Kenneth Waller
But thanks anyway, Ken. Yes, I
I'm with Ken. I like the color version better and I too often find that
converting to BW does little for the picture, IMO.
My other thought is that a skinnier panorama would be more desirable and the
clumpy foreground grass in the lowest part of the picture does not add
anything.
The
In a message dated 3/1/2007 10:05:48 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here you go!
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/01/fashion/01Fitness.html?_r=1oref=slogin
http://tinyurl.com/2av2m5
Scroll about halfway down for Paul's photo
-P
Not a bad photo, Paul. Not bad
Exactly my position ...
And I will find a way if it's in that ballpark, usually to the horror
of my finances angel. !!!
G
On Mar 1, 2007, at 10:25 AM, Peter Jordan wrote:
Don't do that to me. $2995 is more than I can afford but not too much
that I can convince myself it's way too expensive.
Adam Maas wrote:
There's an interesting rumour thread over at APUG, it seems that Carl
Zeiss may be expanding their new line of 35mm lenses to include a ZK
line, with an announcement supposedly at PMA.
This would be interesting, as it would mean that there would be a
readily available
Paul Stenquist wrote:
You guys are good! I had no idea if it was online or where it might be.
In newsprint it's not as saturated or blocky and quite a bit larger,
but I'm pleased that it's on the web. Thanks to all for the responses.
Paul
On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Paul Sorenson
In a message dated 3/1/2007 11:00:51 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm with Ken. I like the color version better and I too often find that
converting to BW does little for the picture, IMO.
My other thought is that a skinnier panorama would be more desirable and the
On Mar 1, 2007, at 10:08 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/row2.htm
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/row.htm
Technical Info: DS, A 35-105, 1/180, f/8, 400 ISO.
I like the composition, a typical pastoral scene in middle California
flatland.
Thanks Ann!!!
Boris
since there are so few shots I'll spit out my instant faves in addition to
G K -
X , Running in the rain, tato1, exercise in boredom,Big Sky...,
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Shel, be sure to take proper care of your health. The list can wait.
Boris
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Gang,
I've resubscribed to the list for a while, mainly to see if you're all
behaving yourselves. From the archives it seems that you are. I guess
having a major disruptive force like
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille
Subject: Re: Interesting Rumour
Saw that rumour too.
I'd be a great news for Pentax if only because a brand with such
recognition offers support for Pentax bodies.
Heck, you can get Schneider lenses in K mount as OEM. g
William Robb
--
PDML
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/row.htm
hmm. Grunt. scratch
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Tom C wrote:
He did make gobs of money off it, and IIRC, won a few Academy Awards.
I didn't see the movie, but I would surmise that we are in the minority
based on it's market performance.
I didn't see it either. First I don't like DiCaprio, second there was such a
big build up to it that
Whoa! Congrats!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 3/1/2007 11:32:29 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/row.htm
hmm. Grunt. scratch
===
LOL. Oh, come off it, YOU are not the one I was talking about you bloody
well know it.
thanks Dan!
Russ
On 3/1/07, Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So do I!
Dan M
Nothing remarkable, but I like the reflections.
http://www.avocadohead.com/piclinks/IMGP2523.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Tom C.
Convert? To what?
Or, I guess the operative question is, FROM what, to what?
I've lived well and long in this modern world, and haven't needed any
conversion at all!
Hmmm.
keith whaley
LOL, I didn't realize the double-meaning there. From, for instance, the
Chinese calendar to
I'll present a little different take on it. I'm not meaning to to be
negative or critical.
Overall I found the series of photos to be quite enjoyable. That is, I
liked seeing them and I think all the photos work well together as a photo
essay of sorts.
When I look at each single image
In a message dated 3/1/2007 11:32:29 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/row.htm
hmm. Grunt. scratch
==
Sorry, actually that was a ROLF.
I couldn't stop laughing for five minutes. In fact, I
Thanks David!
Russ
On 3/1/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont mind the fence.:-), and a great shot BTW
Dave (split rail fence guy) Brooks
On 2/26/07, Russell Kerstetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, it is barbed wire. I guess I have a thing for fences, maybe next
time I
In a message dated 3/1/2007 11:22:25 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Technicals:
- It seems slightly rotated in a clockwise direction.
- Both the BW and color renderings seem a little off on my screen:
as if the middle tones are a bit compressed together, and (in the
Thanks for comments. These are chinchillas, a type of rodent, famous for
its furs. I saw these three beauties in a childrens farm, so fortunately
they were not kept to end up in fur coats.
Henk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL
Quite sure. A was careful focusing correctly. But there's alwayas a chance
that tests can be better.
Anyway, the sharpness of the M4/200mm shot, cant' be a focusing mistake!,
can it?
Jens Bladt
Latest photographs: http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43
That's very good, Dave. Brilliant.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Latest photographs: http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af David
Weiss
Sendt: 1.
Adam Maas wrote:
The downside? The Planar 85/1.4 simply doesn't match the A* in performance.
The Upside: you can actually get one.
-Adam
Know what?
Considering how much my SMC Pentax 85mm f/1.8 cost me, used, I can't
imagine what that 1.4 must cost!
I can!
I can imagine
Indeed!
Jens Bladt
Latest photographs: http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af John
Whittingham
Sendt: 28. februar 2007 23:08
Til:
I had two A*85/1.4 lenses ... sold 'em for about $900.00 each.
Tested one of them against Mark's T* 85/1.4 and we (I) could see no obvious
difference except in color rendering, and the diff was very subtle.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: OT: The tomb of Jesus
Anyway, the tomb of Jesus is just onother a leap of faith, no more, or
less
credible any any other religious belief.
Less credible actually. There's eye-witness accounts in the Bible (not
just
Jesus), real
So what do you base your beliefs on then?
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: The tomb of Jesus
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:35:38 -0600
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Toralf Lund wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
The downside? The Planar 85/1.4 simply doesn't match the A* in performance.
The Upside: you can actually get one.
-Adam
Know what?
Considering how much my SMC Pentax 85mm f/1.8 cost me, used, I can't
imagine what that 1.4 must cost!
I can!
- Original Message -
From: Toralf Lund
Subject: Re: Interesting Rumour
I can imagine it would cost about $1249 in the US.
But that's just my imagination, of course ;-)
Close. I paid a little over $100.00 more than that for my A85/1.4, just over
a year ago.
William Robb
--
Tom C wrote:
Tom C.
Convert? To what?
Or, I guess the operative question is, FROM what, to what?
I've lived well and long in this modern world, and haven't needed any
conversion at all!
Hmmm.
keith whaley
LOL, I didn't realize the double-meaning there. From, for instance, the
Chinese
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
