Can a Sigma EF500 be used with a K10 K100?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
That's a good rule anywhere - I once ran into not just one but a whole herd of
Brahman cattle,
having been blinded by the high-beam lights of a truck which had just turned
one of them into
shepherd's pie.
The best I could do was to go for the belly - the damned cow ran off and was
never seen
Oversaturated color isn't wrong. It's just different. Some pros make
good money working in that genre. I've seen examples of work that is
very good done that way. Many of these fall into that category. Is
there something wrong with BW landscapes since nature isn't really
black and white?
Dear All,
I'm getting quiet sick of the inflated prices of Pentax lenses in Australia.
When are Pentax going to give Australian customers some decent prices and
rebates.
For example I can get the following lenses imported to Australia from USA
with freight for
DA 50-135 $1046
David Savage wrote:
At 09:13 AM 13/09/2007, Mark Cassino wrote:
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Cassino wrote:
http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/stream/stream09.htm
I really like this one:
http://www.markcassino.com/galleries/stream/2007/070910/IMGP0850.htm
Very
On 9/13/07, Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do others think.
It sucks.
I was just quoted AU$1365 for the DA*16-50 f2.8.
Many just buy from OS.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
MikeM wrote:
Can a Sigma EF500 be used with a K10 K100?
Yep, it can, but it might require a firmware upgrade. I got one before
the K10D came out and used it with my *ist D quite successfully. I
haven't yet gotten around to sending it back for the firmware upgrade
for compatibility with the
Scott and I plan to meet at about 10:15 at 30th St
Station and go shooting. We're hoping Joe will join
us--anyone else?
A possible modification to the itinerary (which was
centered on Old City and the historic district) is the
annual Rittenhouse Square arts and crafts festival.
Rittenhouse
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/13 Thu AM 11:27:09 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Price of Pentax Lenses in Australia
Dear All,
I'm getting quiet sick of the inflated prices of Pentax lenses in Australia.
When are Pentax going to give Australian customers some
Just some stuff from a recent visit to Krakow. Mainly sprog pics but not all.
More to come.
http://home.fotocommunity.com/mike.a.wilson/index.php?id=529253g=330667s=0
Specially for Dan M.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uclUYwFQbfQmode=relatedsearch=
-
Those who upload photos are looking forward to comments. Tastes vary,
obviously, and it's with that variable in mind that reactions are
sought.
As I mentioned in one of my earlier posts, if the posting photog has
the result they like, all they must be looking for is a preference
'score'. Also, of
Those prices don't seem so out of line, if I assume that the Australian
price includes a 17% VAT. Maybe it's your government you should be
complaining about. In the US sales taxes are on the order of 4-10% and
are assessed by a State Government and sometimes by a City or County
Government in
Wouldn't that be a beef patty, Sheppard's pie is usually made with
Mutton or Lamb.
John Coyle wrote:
That's a good rule anywhere - I once ran into not just one but a whole herd
of Brahman cattle,
having been blinded by the high-beam lights of a truck which had just turned
one of them into
Nice gallery Mike.
My fave is The end... She looks thoroughly fed up :-)
Cheers,
Dave
On 9/13/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just some stuff from a recent visit to Krakow. Mainly sprog pics but not
all. More to come.
To those who've complained that not all of your photos have been
accepted in the Pentax Gallery, quit yer bitchin'!
Not one of mine has been accepted so far.
Not a single one.
I've still got about 6 pending, but 6 have been rejected outright.
Street shots, still lifes, sports shots (Corner
On 13/09/2007, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those prices don't seem so out of line, if I assume that the Australian
price includes a 17% VAT. Maybe it's your government you should be
complaining about. In the US sales taxes are on the order of 4-10% and
are assessed by a State
On 13/09/2007, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those who upload photos are looking forward to comments. Tastes vary,
obviously, and it's with that variable in mind that reactions are
sought.
As I mentioned in one of my earlier posts, if the posting photog has
the result they like, all
We have a national 10% GST (goods and services tax). There are no
additional city/state taxes. The prices still suck.
Ciao,
Peter in western Sydney
P. J. Alling wrote:
Those prices don't seem so out of line, if I assume that the Australian
price includes a 17% VAT. Maybe it's your
frank theriault wrote:
To those who've complained that not all of your photos have been
accepted in the Pentax Gallery, quit yer bitchin'!
Not one of mine has been accepted so far.
Not a single one.
I've still got about 6 pending, but 6 have been rejected outright.
Street shots, still
On 9/13/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice gallery Mike.
My fave is The end... She looks thoroughly fed up :-)
I agree.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/13 Thu PM 01:06:00 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: GESO - Holiday snaps + Lemk video
Nice gallery Mike.
My fave is The end... She looks thoroughly fed up :-)
Cheers,
Dave
Thanks. She was just hot.
Yes, though there is some disagreement about how well.
To work properly, it needs to have its firmware
updated by Sigma to match the latest K10D firmware.
Even then, mine delivers somewhat inconsistent
results.
If I had it to do over again, I would have saved my
pennies, waited a few months, and
On 9/11/07, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have added a few more images to my portfolio at Photo.net.
Unfortunately, I can't get decent quality when posting to the web. I have to
boost brightness, contrast and saturation so that particularly the sky in
some images look uneven. Anyway,
Exactly, and suggested changes really have no reference.
Jack
--- Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13/09/2007, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those who upload photos are looking forward to comments. Tastes
vary,
obviously, and it's with that variable in mind that
It is worth to use it, viewfinder especially!
I'm now back to film, because i dropped my K100D and now shutter button
does not fire 95% of time... :(
Gasha
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
...
yet. My kit is the 645 plus three 120 magazines, 45/2.8 and 75/2.8
lenses, case, strap, remote cable,
It is an artistic decision. I have never liked highly over saturated images
myself. Of course really is, seemingly, boringly dull to most people.
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 13/09/2007, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the impression they're supposed to look like that to give
Frank, that's because they don't understand the Theraultian ethos,
they're aiming for punchy eye candy, not muddy thought provoking
existentialism.
frank theriault wrote:
To those who've complained that not all of your photos have been
accepted in the Pentax Gallery, quit yer bitchin'!
Not
So, how does an incompatible EF500 Firmware load function (or not) on
the K10D? I just put my 2-year old flash on my brand spanking new
K10D, fired, and the shot looked ok.
Should not have. Mine was about 1 year old when I sent it back to Sigma
about 6 months ago. It would do nothing, even on
So, how does an incompatible EF500 Firmware load function (or not) on
the K10D? I just put my 2-year old flash on my brand spanking new
K10D, fired, and the shot looked ok.
I haven''t had enough time to play with the K10D, let alone put the
flash on it.
dk
On 9/13/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL
I haven't even submitted any of mine. I doubt they'd accept the ones I
like and those I think they'd accept I'm not to sure I'd want there. I
guess I'm agree with Groucho Marx, I wouldn't join a club that would
have me as a member.
frank theriault wrote:
To those who've complained that not
Velvia arose back when lithography was still done via the photo/mechanical
process. You needed a very highly saturated original because some saturation
was lost in each step of the process and advertising people especially wanted
their magazine ads to be highly saturation so they would jump off
Welcome to the Camera Club, Frank. If your photos don't look like everyone
else's photos you do not know how to take pictures...
frank theriault wrote:
To those who've complained that not all of your photos have been
accepted in the Pentax Gallery, quit yer bitchin'!
Not one of mine has
Is that a one time tax at time of purchase, or is it assessed every time
the item changes hands in classic value added tax fashion?
Peter McIntosh wrote:
We have a national 10% GST (goods and services tax). There are no
additional city/state taxes. The prices still suck.
Ciao,
Peter in
P-TTL and off-camera flash do not (or should not!) be
working properly without the firmware upgrade.
I got some decent shots with my 10-year-old Sunpak on
my K10D, too, but it was a dumb-luck non-reproducible
phenomenon.
Rick
--- Dave Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, how does an
This subject probably is little bit outdated, but anyway:
I went another way, and got P6x7 MLU with 75mm lens.
First impression was - uh, that's big. But difference between 645 is not
very large. Lens - yes, lenses are big.
First roll i shot handhold, just for testing.
Mirror flap and
Interestingly enough I do not believe any state here in the US taxes service,
only goods. That was one of the reasons that after my first attempt as a
commercial photographer I changed my rate structure to a pure service one of
time + a service charge for obtaining materials which I bought
From:
Charles Robinson
On Sep 12, 2007, at 13:30, John Sessoms wrote:
From:
Scott Loveless
Anyone else just spend 20 minutes touching every square on that damn
map?
Congrats John!
John Celio wrote:
Holy shit holy shit holy shit holy shit holy shit!
I think I just won a DA 21mm lens
He does make a valid point though.
I'd be far more likely to buy a lens for a camera I just won than I
would to buy a camera to fit a lens or a flash ... although I think
Pentax'd probably get better marketing value for giving away a camera kit.
I'd be far more likely to buy *ANOTHER* lens for
I was obtusely responding with WHAT? since you mentioned people that can't
hear very well. :-)
Your other perceptions as to liking the standard Velvia pallet vs. a
subsequent boost are accurate.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To:
From:
P. J. Alling
Those look like typical Velvia, or as I like to call it Velveeta,
(Kraft Corporation's processed Cheese Food, since it has the same
relationship to natural color that Velveeta has to natural cheese), to
me.. I still have a hard time believing that this stuff actually
A lot of the pictures on there seem like crisp snapshots of pretty
things rather than good photographs. Anyone can take a well focused
picture of something pretty, but is it really worthy? I don't know.
Perhaps we're just back to the art discussion.
rg2
On 9/13/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
Kenneth Waller
.Velvia may give some images that little boost that makes them
appear closer to our memory of the scene.
Probably why most (if not all) of the current nationally known outdoor
photographers shot Velvia for years before switching to Velvia.
--
PDML
John Sessoms wrote:
What do you figure my chances are with everyone on the list having a two
day head start?
1:189,000
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Ah vindication! Thanks John.
I think the giveaway is fine. It's just that I think they stopped short of
what would make it a really great one.
Tom C.
From: John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentaxian.com Contest
From:
graywolf
Interestingly enough I do not believe any state here in the US taxes
service, only goods. That was one of the reasons that after my first
attempt as a commercial photographer I changed my rate structure to a
pure service one of time + a service charge for obtaining materials
I don't know what to say. On my monitor it looks fine, as do the other 5
when viewed individually. Of course I wasn't there, nor do I have the
transparency to compare it to.
Tom C.
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
You need to study the compositional aspects of many of those pictures.
Sometime it takes more than a quick glance. What looks like a snapshot may
only look like that because you don't know what work went into the
composition.
Anybody can take a picture of a leaf laying on a dirty sidewalk
How many people who do not already own Pentax equipment would hang
out on a Pentaxian community website looking at what other Pentax
users had to say?
I feel the criticism is misplaced. It's a little easter egg hunt to
inspire enthusiasm for pentax users, not a major win a pentax
camera
The P645 viewfinder is good, but I expect that of any professional
medium format SLR.
I was at a talk last night given by Charles Anselmo, who has an
exhibition of his work at the Aftermodern gallery in San Francisco at
present (http://www.aftermodern.com/c_anselmo.php).
His primary camera
Hope you have good light !
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Philly PDML this weekend!
Scott and I plan to meet at about 10:15 at 30th St
Station and go shooting. We're hoping Joe will join
us--anyone else?
A follow up email, which you haven't seen, corrected my DUH moment -
It should have read -
Probably why most (if not all) of the current nationally known outdoor
photographers shot Velvia for years before switching to Digital..
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message
I don't think I'm being overly critical. Winning a lens or something else
is fun. Winning a camera body or kit would be even better. I don't see how
winning or clicking around = inspiring enthusiam though. Regardless of the
intended purpose for the site, wouldn't inspiring enthusiam
John Sessoms wrote:
I'd be far more likely to buy a lens for a camera I just won than I
would to buy a camera to fit a lens or a flash ... although I think
Pentax'd probably get better marketing value for giving away a camera
kit.
They're probably guessing that most people visiting the site
Obviously the site is not for you. Why bitch about it?
G
On Sep 13, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Tom C wrote:
I don't think I'm being overly critical. Winning a lens or
something else
is fun. Winning a camera body or kit would be even better. I don't
see how
winning or clicking around =
Because it's a free country where freedom of expression is valued?
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentaxian.com Contest
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:10:12 -0700
Obviously the
I finally got the North America Naturally day book/ date book/
engagement calendar up on lulu
and I'm hard at work on son of Sign Language no money coming in
from ebay. I hope I'll
finish the son in the next week or so at the outside..
http://www.lulu.com/content/1145976
you can see why I
Hi there.
It's been a while, but I think I might as well resubscribe to the PDML,
don't you agree? ;-)
Here is a short digest of things Pentax and things photography that
happened to us.
1. First and foremost, I gave my daughter a 6th birthday present -
Pentax W30. It was chosen because the
Welcome back and congratulations on the calendar inclusion!
Tom C.
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Rejoining the group
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:25:18 +0300
Hi there.
It's been a while,
I shouldn't pick my nose while reading emails. It's interfering with my
obtuse receptor. ::0
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was obtusely responding with WHAT? since you mentioned people
that can't
hear very well. :-)
Your other perceptions as to liking the standard Velvia
They may have used it solely for its commercial applications...editor's
suggestion.(?)
Jack
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A follow up email, which you haven't seen, corrected my DUH moment -
It should have read -
Probably why most (if not all) of the current nationally known
On 9/13/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there.
It's been a while, but I think I might as well resubscribe to the PDML,
don't you agree? ;-)
snip
Welcome back, Boris!
L'shanah tovah!
I was just thinking the other day that I hadn't seen or heard from you
in a while, and I was
Tom C wrote:
No why would I have a problem with anyone receiving a nice prize? You
obviously chose to ignore my first two sentences.
I'm just pointing out the irony of a *camera company* having legendary
products not giving some of those legendary cameras away in a 'contest'.
Actually,
You need to study the compositional aspects of many of those pictures.
the lack of composition was my point
rg2
On 9/13/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to study the compositional aspects of many of those pictures.
Sometime it takes more than a quick glance. What looks like a
Bull.
Just because you're free to express yourself doesn't mean you are
obliged to do so in a consistently and unnecessarily negative and
unconstructive manner to satisfy your ego. That's rude behavior, not
freedom of speech.
G
On Sep 13, 2007, at 11:12 AM, Tom C wrote:
Because it's a
I remember you, welcome back! And happy new year to you as well :o)
Congratulations on getting into the calendar, are the pictures in you
PAW gallery?
rg2
On 9/13/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there.
It's been a
Well I'm sorry you don't get it.
Even though we now know the site was not designed to attract new business to
Pentax, let me ask... If you won an owners manual or a hubcap for an
automobile you didn't own, what would you do with it?
Tom C.
From: Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Was I rude? I think you're being a little oversensitive.
You fail to acknowledge that I provided some positive remarks and even made
constructive suggestions. Maybe those are unwelcome as well?
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Happy holiday, Boris. And welcome back. We missed you.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there.
It's been a while, but I think I might as well resubscribe to the PDML,
don't you agree? ;-)
Here is a short digest of
Saturday or Sunday, Rick?
I could possibly bop down and join you
ann
Rick Womer wrote:
Scott and I plan to meet at about 10:15 at 30th St
Station and go shooting. We're hoping Joe will join
us--anyone else?
A possible modification to the itinerary (which was
centered on Old City and the
The question you posed is indeed What is a good picture? a sibling
to What is art? ...
Let the debate commence (again) !
Godfrey
On Sep 13, 2007, at 11:39 AM, Rebekah wrote:
You need to study the compositional aspects of many of those
pictures.
the lack of composition was my point
On
Happy New Year, Boris! And congratulations on the calendar inclusion!
It's always good to hear of your successes. :-)
I don't read or speak Hebrew but that wouldn't stop me from
appreciating a nice calendar...!
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Boris - Happy New year and welcome back!
ann
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi there.
It's been a while, but I think I might as well resubscribe to the PDML,
don't you agree? ;-)
Here is a short digest of things Pentax and things photography that
happened to us.
1. First and foremost, I gave my
Maybe the judges' eyes were just blurry...
Norm
frank theriault wrote:
To those who've complained that not all of your photos have been
accepted in the Pentax Gallery, quit yer bitchin'!
Not one of mine has been accepted so far.
Not a single one.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 9/13/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question you posed is indeed What is a good picture? a sibling
to What is art? ...
We haven't had this debate in at least a month. It's time...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML
I think I've failed to make my point. I'm probably also responding because
I do primarily landscape and nature type of photography and I seek out
pretty things to photograph, and it's almost never simply a matter of
holding up the camera and pressing the shutter release.
You apparently
The question you posed is indeed What is a good picture? a sibling
to What is art? ...
We haven't had this debate in at least a month. It's time...
;-)
:o) that, and does a good subject make a good picture?
rg2
On 9/13/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/07, Godfrey
On 9/13/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question you posed is indeed What is a good picture? a sibling
to What is art? ...
We haven't had this debate in at least a month. It's time...
;-)
cheers,
frank
Let me be the first to weigh in on this then...
What I say is art,
Started to post a LOL, but then got to thinking. Only 87% of politicians are
lawyers, but 100% of politicians hire lawyers. When you think of it a service
tax does not hurt the person it applies to it hurts his customers. No only do
politicians hire lawyers, they hire all kinds of other service
On 9/13/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shouldn't pick my nose while reading emails. It's interfering with my
obtuse receptor. ::0
I think what you really meant was I shouldn't read my e-mails while I
pick my nose?
;-)
(couldn't resist)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois
Saturday.
We'd love to have you, Ann!
--- ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saturday or Sunday, Rick?
I could possibly bop down and join you
ann
Rick Womer wrote:
Scott and I plan to meet at about 10:15 at 30th St
Station and go shooting. We're hoping Joe will
join
Sorry my editor is on holiday.
graywolf wrote:
Started to post a LOL, but then got to thinking. Only 87% of politicians are
lawyers, but 100% of politicians hire lawyers. When you think of it a service
tax does not hurt the person it applies to it hurts his customers. No(t) only
do
On 9/13/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shouldn't pick my nose while reading emails. It's interfering with my
obtuse receptor. ::0
I think what you really meant was I shouldn't read my e-mails while I
pick my nose?
;-)
(couldn't resist)
cheers,
frank
Here it comes:
You can
Due to Kodachrome's special processing requirements E-4 and later E-6
films started replacing it in many applications between 25-30 years ago,
an organization I was working for experimented with processing E-6 in
house, with Kodachrome it just wasn't feasible. It's been a slow decline
for
Welcome back Boris, at least I missed ya'.
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi there.
It's been a while, but I think I might as well resubscribe to the PDML,
don't you agree? ;-)
Here is a short digest of things Pentax and things photography that
happened to us.
1. First and foremost, I gave my
You need to come out west sometime. :-)
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: A few more images
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:27:05 -0400
Now landscape photographers use Velvia and
If the paper were nice and soft, I'd hang it in the outhouse. If the
hubcap were rare and interesting, I'd make it into a wall clock,
otherwise I'd use it as a dangerous Frisbee...
Tom C wrote:
Well I'm sorry you don't get it.
Even though we now know the site was not designed to attract new
Good pictures come in all shapes and sizes. Sometimes it's the compositon that
makes a shot memorable. But a fascinating subject can achieve that as well. And
of course sheer beauty is always worth a second look. In truth, there is no
single, narrow definition.
Paul
-- Original
Nice and concise. I like it.
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:43:09 +
Good pictures come in all shapes and sizes. Sometimes it's the compositon
On 9/13/07, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe the judges' eyes were just blurry...
...which would have made them look sharp?
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I've been out west. I've seen Velvia photographs of places I've been and
haven't recognized them...
Tom C wrote:
You need to come out west sometime. :-)
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Hah... all good ideas. :-)
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentaxian.com Contest
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:36:45 -0400
If the paper were nice and soft, I'd hang it in the
Rick Womer wrote:
Saturday.
We'd love to have you, Ann!
I think I need a break so I will try to do it --
send my your cell phone number off list and I'll send you mine
and I'll check on the train schedules ( I would take the nj transit and
septa)
If I can't get my butt in gear I'll let you
works for me too :)
rg2
On 9/13/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice and concise. I like it.
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:43:09 +
I'll have to let you know. (boy my keyboard is slick)
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shouldn't pick my nose while reading emails. It's interfering
with my
obtuse receptor. ::0
I think what you really meant was I shouldn't
Thanks, Tom!!
Jack ;)
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question you posed is indeed What is a good picture? a
sibling
to What is art? ...
We haven't had this debate in at least a month. It's time...
;-)
cheers,
frank
Ea.
Jack Davis wrote:
I'll have to let you know. (boy my keyboard is slick)
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shouldn't pick my nose while reading emails. It's interfering
with my
obtuse receptor. ::0
On 9/13/07, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From:
graywolf
Interestingly enough I do not believe any state here in the US taxes
service, only goods. That was one of the reasons that after my first
attempt as a commercial photographer I changed my rate structure to a
pure service
What is sheer beauty?
G
On Sep 13, 2007, at 12:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good pictures come in all shapes and sizes. Sometimes it's the
compositon that makes a shot memorable. But a fascinating subject
can achieve that as well. And of course sheer beauty is always
worth a second
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
What is sheer beauty?
Nikkala Stott.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
It is, of course, in the eye of the beholder.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is sheer beauty?
G
On Sep 13, 2007, at 12:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good pictures come in all shapes and sizes. Sometimes it's
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
