Amy, your pictures are fine. In the scale you are working in though, may
I suggest a couple of things?
1. You need to be stopping down to absolute maximum. This will give you
the greatest possible depth of field, which in the dimensions you are
photographing, are bound to be abysmal, but
I agree Brother William, they truly cannot see us as the burning beacon
on a distant horizon, a lighthouse waiting to guild them in to the safe
harbor of the 6x7 format. Amen.
Brother Norm
William Robb wrote:
Methinks we should not allow the puny me too users of the little
medium format into
That will help to guarantee that you miss a few flights Raymond... G
Norm
Oliver Raymond wrote:
Thought we should be intersted in the following.. I'm printing out the FAA
regulations, and including them in my wallet!
http://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/tib/tib5201.shtml
-
This message is
I would assume that they'd all come with that warranty, and my understanding of all of
this is that this only becomes an issue when you need to
send the camera in for the warranty work.
From the Pentax site:
Gray Market Pentax Products: There has been a lot of press lately cautioning
This part made me laugh:
NO INTERNATIONAL BIDDERS PLEASE, NOT EVEN CANADIAN.
Norm
Gary Murphy wrote:
Spotted on eBay with a Buy It Now of, $60.00
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1333766929
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
In a message dated 19/02/02 08:58:09 GMT Standard Time, Pal writes:
Doesn't all Pentax equipment come with one year international warranty
right from the factory? At least it does over here. It doesn't matter where
you buy it in the world; US, UK, Hong Kong, Japan; every Pentax repair
Thanks, Peter. Although now it seems to have gone out of my price range.
Subject: Re: Pentax LX ViewFinder FC1
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 12:54:30 -0500
I'd say so.
Hello all.
I am thinking about buying a FC1 viewfinder (I already have the FB1 and
FD2). I have seen one on an auction site for £25.
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 04:27 PM, T Rittenhouse wrote:
Can those who use an LX be little bitty brothers?
That honour is reserved for owners of the ME Super. LXers are Slightly
Less Bitty Brothers.
-BB Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 07:11 PM, T Rittenhouse wrote:
Don't let them fool you Ma'm they only reason they want a sisterhood is
because someone has to wash their robes and cook their gruel.
Gruel? Please, we eat only the finest Ho Fun with beef (or tofu for
the veggies among us).
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 04:53 PM, tom wrote:
While you big fat stodgy 67ers are mumbling incantations, wearing goofy
robes, consulting chiropractors, and hauling 50 pound packs around, us
645ers will be out
shooting.
I would respond to this, but in June I am marrying a
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 07:48 PM, Brother J. C. O'Connell
wrote:
The ISO 250 negs with pull
processing just look better to me.
This is what processing your own negs is all about: controlling it so
that you get exactly what you want.
I'm glad to hear the 67 gear is working out so
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 06:15 PM, Fred wrote:
You are right. There are a few hasty generalizations here on the
PDML (as with life in general) which have been repeated often enough
as to become more-or-less accepted, even if not necessarily true.
For instance, the myth that the
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 05:49 PM, William Robb wrote:
I say Shel Belinkoff needs to make the sacrifice of the
pocketbook.
What say you, Brothers?
I vote yay. Shel, you'll like it in the Brotherhood. There's a sense
of community and love, and best of all, BIG FREAKIN' NEGATIVES.
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 06:27 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hear, hear. A P67 for Mrs. Reed!
I truly believe, deep in my soul, that Mrs. Reed's quality of life would
be greatly increased by a Pentax 67.
Think, Mrs. Reed, that by spending $1000 or less you could increase the
quality of
In
Amita Guha wrote:
Me either! I have a Yashicamat EM!
Hey! Don't forget me! I have a Yashica D!
William in Utah.
PS. I wonder how many of us Y-M owners there are on the Pentax list
anyway.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Yer in.
Treena Harp wrote:
I proudly own my poor, beaten-up Yashica D. I try not to let it see the 645
very often, because it does become a bit envious ...
- Original Message -
From: William Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:36 PM
Sure, William in Utah,
You're in. All ya gotta do to be in OUR club (not a cult like those
mirror-flappers) is have a Yashica tlr, and not have 'tude.
cheers,
Mat-boy
William Johnson wrote:
Hey! Don't forget me! I have a Yashica D!
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:37:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, William
Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey! Don't forget me! I have a Yashica D!
William in Utah.
PS. I wonder how many of us Y-M owners there are on the Pentax list
anyway.
In
JeffW. wrote:
on 2/19/02 3:59 AM, Bill Owens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's see, there's you, Dave, Frank and myself that admit to it. I actually
have 2, a 635 w/o the 35mm adapter and a 124G that has problems accepting
220 film
Bill
You can add me to the list with a
Myth?
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
For instance, the myth that the Pentax 67 is gigantic, overly heavy and
not hand-holdable.
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
Heh Shel.Funny thing,there was one of those next ot
the Yashi67 i just bought. LOL
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:12:08 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
OK you girly-boys,
I've decided to move up
I now have two tripods, a monopod, and enough quick release plates to go
around. Also, I just bought an electronic cable release for my Super
Programs. And stopping down to f/5.6 So my shots should show a marked
improvement in sharpness the next time I shoot a school play.
Next stop: A KX to
I did find a wonderful medium format
folder last week. Proud III
It has the little ground glass vertical
viewer (like the very old folders) as well
as the rangefinder.
It also has alternate windows onthe back for
viewing different frame marks, and a flip-up
mask for shooting 6x4.5 or 6x6.
Enought to put a scare into the Brotherhood me thinks
g
Dave(no flap)Brooks
Begin Original Message
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS. I wonder how many of us Y-M owners there are on the Pentax
list
anyway.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 09:46 PM, Peter Alling wrote,
regarding moose hats:
Be careful in the woods during hunting season.
...or on the road. 0.1% of all motor vehicle accidents in Canada
involve a moose.
-Aaron
keeper of true facts
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hi, gang
The SC-69 screen on my LX has a lot of dirt.
How can I clean it without damage?
Regards
AG
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 11:15 PM, Oliver Raymond wrote:
Thought we should be intersted in the following.. I'm printing out the
FAA
regulations, and including them in my wallet!
http://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/tib/tib5201.shtml
My favourite warning is this one:
Be
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 07:27 AM, Fred wrote:
Aw, c'mon, brother Aaron, please don't carry that Brotherhood
stuff over to this thread, too. Remember, this thread is about
~fast~ glass, not just about ~big~ glass - g.
Heh. I'm serious, though. Put a Pentax 67 next to an F5.
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 12:11 AM, Amy Hughes wrote:
http://www.amyhughes.org/lego/church/temp/church001.jpg
That's lovely. How long have you been building it?
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
On 19 Feb 2002 at 11:43, Norman Baugher wrote:
I agree Brother William, they truly cannot see us as the burning
beacon on a distant horizon, a lighthouse waiting to guild them in to
the safe harbor of the 6x7 format.
That's not a lighthouse, that's the fiery pain of your hernia.
tv
-
This
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:04:23 -0500, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Be cautious with film not purchased through Kodak or authorized Kodak
dealers. Ask about the source of the film, and consider shooting a test
before you use it.
Little digs like this just kill Kodak's credibility.
I think they're
Don't do it Shel. Get a Speed Graphic and become a Pro Photographer.
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:35 PM
Subject: Re:
Ooo... You need to get one of those, Tom. Just think of the possiblities.
12x36 wedding albums
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002
The rest of the accidents involve meeses
Dave(losser of facts)
Begin Original Message
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:23:58 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: 67 Brotherhood
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 09:46 PM, Peter Alling
I have a Ricohflex, the only thing you can say for them is that they a
better than Yashicaflexes. But I can not join your club because I am a Pro
Photographer, and if you don't believe me I will blow your eyes out with a
press 25 flash bulb. By the way I also have a couple of Norman 200B strobes
I'm not sure whether that guild Norm wrote was supposed to be guide or
geld.
Len (G, d, r)
---
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 8:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
On 19 Feb 2002 at 11:43, Norman Baugher
As an afterthought, here are the figures for the Mamiya 7II:
Dimensions: 159 x 112 x 66
Weight: 920 grams, 1210 ~including~ 80mm normal lens
Note: None of the weights include batteries, which, in the case of the
67 and the Nikon can add quite a few more grams. The LX and the Mamiya
Camera weight is quantifiable of course, but how that weight affects one's
use of the camera is purely subjective. Sunday, I hiked a few miles into
LaJolla Canyon, uphill all the way, with a 6x7 and three lenses in a Pelican
case, and a tripod tucked under my other arm. The weight of the
The 67 battery weighs but a fraction of an ounce.
Paul
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
As an afterthought, here are the figures for the Mamiya 7II:
Dimensions: 159 x 112 x 66
Weight: 920 grams, 1210 ~including~ 80mm normal lens
Note: None of the weights include batteries, which, in the
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 10:11 AM, Fred wrote:
Heh. I'm serious, though. Put a Pentax 67 next to an F5. Compare
physical size. Compare weight. Hell, my old Mamiya C330 twin lens
weighed more than my 67 and was significantly more awkward to
hand-hold.
Why an F5? Why not an
I originally replied to this a few days ago, but learned that some changes
in my email setting meant that my posts didn't go through - hopefully
(thanks Doug!) this will now...
Depth of field is a function of magnification, so it doesn't matter how you
get to the magnification, DOF is the
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 10:49 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I must agree with Fred here. A few weeks ago I stopped by my usual lab
to
pick up some slides and one of the owners was there. He shoots weddings
with a 67II and brought it out to show to me. I was impressed by two
things:
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 04:55 PM, Robert Harris wrote:
Why would an LX user want to be part of this Brotherhood of Bloat?
Now, now...where is the bloat on the 67? Sure, it's bigger than an LX,
because it takes bigger film and has that glorious prism, but compare it
to another 67
two words,volkswagon beetle g
Dave
. How much bigger/heavier would the 67 be with a motor drive
or winder?
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 11:12 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It's amazing to me that the Nikon is so big and heavy. Seems to defeat
the purpose of a discreet, 35mm camera.
Yep. But it is accepted as the default photojournalist 35. That's the
point I'm trying to make...why is that
Of course ... since there was discussion about size, I thought some
figures would be useful.
There are people who hike with bigger and heavier view cameras, and I
had a friend, many years ago, who would take his 8 x 10 camera out on
the streets of San Francisco.
Again, as always, it comes down
Alas, I had my hopes that the Little Brothers would realize their lot in
life and satisfied with a position, however symbolic, in the Brotherhood.
But it seems that their envy has made this impossible. I vote aye to the
P67B... long live the Brotherhood!
Brother Chris, P67B
On Tue, 19 Feb
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Yep. But it is accepted as the default photojournalist 35. That's the
point I'm trying to make...why is that acceptable to carry around, but
the 67 is insanely gigantic?
It's only acceptable to some people, and in some circumstances. And it
does defeat
the purpose of
Hi, Brotherhood
I'm a tiny format user, and need help.
My LX screen is dirty, and I want to clean it, without damaging it.
Recomendations?
Thanks
Albano
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
I think they are referring to possible grey market film which could have
been through Xrays when the indie reseller imported it.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 February 2002 14:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Kodak shows effect
Remove the screen, blow some air on it, or use a brush, and get the
surface dirt off. It has been noted here that a very mild solution of
dishwashing soap can be used to remove grease, and then rinse the screen
in distilled water. I've never tried this, but other sources suggest it
and similar
Okay, here's what I am trying to say: the 67 has a reputation for
being overly heavy and not hand-holdable. [snip] That is what I
am trying to say. [snip] I am trying to make the point that it
is a portable, convenient size.
OK, Aaron, I guess I'll try to understand that concept (even
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Yep. But it is accepted as the default photojournalist 35. That's the
point I'm trying to make...why is that acceptable to carry around, but
the 67 is insanely gigantic?
It's only acceptable to some people, and in some
It happens all the time. Frankly, Scarlet, I don't give a damn. People
will think what they want to think, and while it may be useful to help
people overcome their prejudices and see something with a different POV,
there is no need for evangelical fervor in so doing, especially wrt a
camera
I just recently started developing and printing my own BW, and before that
used with scans of BW film or de-saturated color film. I'll also flip the
digicam into BW mode from time to time.
If you're planning to use a scanner and digital printer, I'd suggest using
either chromogenic BW (like
Pentax make the smallest or close-to-the-smallest cameras in
virtually every class that they are in.
This is quite true. However, some of those classes are made of
rather large pieces of photographic gear. Being the smallest
gorilla in a troop of gorillas still means that you're a gorilla.
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Remove the screen, blow some air on it, or use a brush, [snip]
How do screens compare with mirrors for scratch-resistance? I've heard
that the mirrors scratch very easily, and that even a fine brush can leave
marks on it. How strong are focusing
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Fred wrote:
Okay, here's what I am trying to say: the 67 has a reputation for
being overly heavy and not hand-holdable. [snip] That is what I
am trying to say. [snip] I am trying to make the point that it
is a portable, convenient size.
OK, Aaron, I guess I'll
Wrong!
You are confusing aperture (diameter of the opening) with f-stop (focal
length divided by aperture). Also since DOF is normally figured for 8x10
prints viewed at 10 inches you can use 0.25mm (1/100 inch) as your COC for
all calculations.
At f8 a 500mm lens has 10x as large an aperture as
Or you could get a freighter pack frame and strap the Pelican and the tripod
to it.
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:30
joe wrote:
As i do a bit of wildlife photography as most would know its a hit and miss
exercise.
Some slides will turn out while others will not.
I'm considering getting my slides processed without the mounts so that way
I will be
able
to sort through them and mount those that came out.
Is the
I've cleaned a couple of mirrors with no disasters or problems. One had
a lot of black, decomposed foam and sticky stuff on it. I just used
some lens cleaner on a q-tip, and gently wiped it away. Another list
member is using the camera now, and he's had no complaints or concerns
about the
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It happens all the time. Frankly, Scarlet, I don't give a damn. People
will think what they want to think, and while it may be useful to help
people overcome their prejudices and see something with a different POV,
there is no need for evangelical
??? will, I suggest you punch him out and quit reading them.
I find it great fun, and I am on the opposite side of it. You do know you
can skip messages you are not interested in? When everybody starts skipping
them the thread dies.
Ciao,
Graywolf
But
Mamiya America is independent of Mamiya.
They're an importer with a license.
Their profits prices have nothing to
do with prices set anywhere else.
Collin
--
---
Get over it.
Dr. Laura
--
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
Fred wrote:
Being the smallest gorilla in a troop of gorillas
still means that you're a gorilla.
That's going in my permanent collection of PDML quotations!
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 03:23 PM, Bill Owens wrote:
I think there is a problem with the ME and MES. Using just the orange
filter, the TTL metering in my MES (which I THINK is fixed) shows a 1
stop
correction. The data sheet shows 2 1/3 stops correction. This
morning I
shot a
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 12:45 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
there is no need for evangelical fervor in so doing, especially wrt a
camera choice.
Shel, I've been trying to ape some of the Nikon/Canon testimonials I've
read over the ages. It has all been quite tongue-in-cheek. I most
This guy thinks he's a Zen photographer, kind of like Chevy Chase in
caddy shack ... see the camera, be the camera ... Repeat about 1000
time until you think you're results look like Ansel Adams.
At 09:57 AM 2/19/2002 -0500, you wrote:
All the secrets of photography revealed!
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 12:19 PM, Fred wrote:
OK, Aaron, I guess I'll try to understand that concept (even though
I'm not rushing out to buy a 6x7). ;-) However, as beautiful a
camera body the 6x7 may be to some, it still is far larger in every
physical characteristic than most
Chris Brogden asked: How strong are focusing screens?
not very strong at all, they are plastic, I have scratched one with over
vigorous use of a cotton bud.
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
I too, was having trouble getting a decent BW print from my Epson 1270.
After trying many different settings for glossy photo paper, I found that
setting the printer software on plain paper, but using Ilford Glossy
Galerie, the results are much better. I think it's due to the fact that the
However, all the Brotherhood and enablement nonsense, no matter
how good natured, is becoming tiresome, and, to some people, a bit
annoying.
I concur, Shel. What started out as a humorous show of medium
format cameraderie (misspelling intentional - g) has become not
so funny anymore (not
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 12:25 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It has been noted here that a very mild solution of
dishwashing soap can be used to remove grease, and then rinse the screen
in distilled water.
I've had great luck getting grease and oil and the like off of optical
At 10:11 AM 2/19/2002 -0500, Fred wrote:
Aw, c'mon, brother Aaron, please don't carry that Brotherhood
stuff over to this thread, too. Remember, this thread is about
~fast~ glass, not just about ~big~ glass - g.
Heh. I'm serious, though. Put a Pentax 67 next to an F5. Compare
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone tried painting with light? Any
suggestions or tips?
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
-
There is a really cool website on nocturnal
photography and painting with light is addressed.
I must just have a dirty mind but the double entendre possibilities in
these posts
are getting too hard to ignore. (If you don't remember just look back at
some of
the posts about membership), and now this. I can just see Aaron an Bill
leading a
whole army of them. (Oh that was so
Had a 'date' with a fellow photographer on Sunday. We were going to
take some shots in a planned community about an hour west of here. I knew
that she shot Minolta autofocus.
As I was preparing my camera gear I was torn. It was either take
the two snake-skinned LXs or the two
Christian,
I trick shown to me is to remove the base plate and soak it in
Coca-Cola. Don't let it sit there forever though. I had to do this with
one of my Spotmatics and the cover came out cleanly.
It may not take a truckload, but it would sure feel like it... but
I do
If dishwashing detergent such as Dawn is used, you should note that it
usually contains a lot of salt (the regular sodium chloride stuff) as a
bulking agent, so the screen and fingers should be thoroughly washed before
refitting. As an aside this is also one of the reasons that you might not
want
Christian, have you tried boiling the bottom cover? Boiling water often
releases battery crud... not sure if this is possible, but it was just a
passing thought
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
I was watching the movie Vertical Limit the other night and saw the
funniest the-technical-advisor-should-be-shot error.
Chris O'Donnel (our hero) is supposed to be a National Geographic wildlife
photographer. They show him sitting in a blind in Pakistan photographing
Snow Leopards witha
Has anyone tried the Velbon Maxi 343? I've only read about in Pop Photo, but it
sounds to good to be true. I still don't know about a 300mm with no mount, but for
anything else. If someone can give me favorable report on one, I'll probably buy one.
I think they go for about $80 from BH.
This site has been mentioned here in the past,
but it's still awesome...
http://www.lostamerica.com/lostframe.html
Regards,
Stephen
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Christian Skofteland wrote:
I was watching the movie Vertical Limit the other night and saw the
funniest the-technical-advisor-should-be-shot error.
[snip]
Yeah, a National Geographic wildlife photographer would be using Kodak
MAX It made me burst out laughing to
What??? I did not write the rest of that line after ??? Where did it come
from?
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original Message -
From: T Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 12:55 PM
Cause it's not Fuji velvia
--- Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Christian Skofteland wrote:
I was watching the movie Vertical Limit the
other night and saw the
funniest the-technical-advisor-should-be-shot
error.
[snip]
Yeah, a National Geographic wildlife
But they do own the trade mark in the US. Which allows them to restrict the
import of Mamiya equipment.
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
The older versions of Gold Max were too contrasty and oversaturated, and
underexposures turned black into a muddy brown. All that has changed with
the newest formulation, which says something like 25 percent improved on
the box. It's more subtle, it's sharper, contrast has been moderated, and
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 02:18:14PM -0500, Christian Skofteland wrote:
I was watching the movie Vertical Limit the other night and saw the
funniest the-technical-advisor-should-be-shot error.
Chris O'Donnel (our hero) is supposed to be a National Geographic wildlife
photographer. They
I'll try it. At this point I'll try anything!
Thanks!
Christian
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 14:18, you wrote:
Christian, have you tried boiling the bottom cover? Boiling water often
releases battery crud... not sure if this is possible, but it was just a
passing thought
Regards,
So we get digital binocs instead of a DSLR?
Argh..
-R
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Thanks. It's sitting in a cup of Coke right now! How long did you soak your
Baseplate?
Christian
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 14:09, you wrote:
Christian,
I trick shown to me is to remove the base plate and soak it in
Coca-Cola. Don't let it sit there forever though. I had to do
I'm needing to upgrade my enlarger.
This one is a good starter, but
probably not an appropriate
professional unit.
DeJur Versatile Professional.
4x5
Comes somewhat complete.
It came with no neg carriers
so I had to make them myself.
They work well, and are included.
It also comes with some
The only thing I could think of as I was looking at it was that it was to
do the same function as the roller that is in that spot in newer LX
cameras. That way, as the motor drive is chugging along, it is keeping the
film taunt for the takeup spools.
drill two holes in it and use a spanner wrench
to get it off.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christian Skofteland
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spotmatic Enabled
Cesar;
I think
On 19 Feb 2002 at 11:53, Chris Brogden wrote:
I agree; evangelists and fanatics scare the #%$ out of me. Hence the
humourous, tongue-in-cheek tone of the P67B posts. Some 35mm guys
have responded in kind (the hernia comment was great, Tom!),
When did I become a 35mm guy? If I'm any sort
http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1014154223.html
R
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, tom wrote:
On 19 Feb 2002 at 11:53, Chris Brogden wrote:
I agree; evangelists and fanatics scare the #%$ out of me. Hence the
humourous, tongue-in-cheek tone of the P67B posts. Some 35mm guys
have responded in kind (the hernia comment was great, Tom!),
When did
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 02:18 PM, Christian Skofteland wrote:
They show him sitting in a blind in Pakistan photographing
Snow Leopards witha Nikon F5. so far so good. His assistant drops a
roll of
film (to show how incompetent the locals are I guess, whatever.) and
when he
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
