-Original Message-
From: David Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pretty soon we'll all have to shower blindfolded in case we see
something offensive.
It will be a sad day when it is a crime to offend ourselves.
If we can't look at other naked bodies, why should we be
Rob Studdert wrote:
http://www.crumpler.com.au/b4b/
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
My two favourite words in the English language
Hi all,
I've been doing some more learning-the-hard-way. Today's lesson is
that when you shoot neg film to be cross-processed in E6, overexpose
it by a few stops. If I'd done some research prior to shooting I'd
have had better results. The film looked completely unexposed but I
could
http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-3513_7-6388181-1.html?tag=nl.e501
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
Hi!
Today (Sunday 13th Nov) is Remembrance Sunday in the UK, and services
were taking place up and down the country to honour and remember those
who have passed away in conflict, not just in two world wars, but in
countless other arenas over the years. I was in Watlington, Oxfordshire,
covering
Hi!
http://members.aol.com/ernreed/istd5524rs.jpg
Since Texas looks the same all over ...
This is a nice geology lesson, I think. Though I'm not preparing a
lecture to go with it.
Taken with the *istD and the 28-70 f/4 last Friday.
It sure looks like some roads here, just probably way
Hi!
Here is another of my really old ones... it's from my first ever roll
of Velvia.
http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/printsdb/view.php?p=121t=1
Velvianic... Ve(zu)lvian... ;-)
Lovely.
Boris
Nothing much to say, except I love the *istDS
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/05_11_almostsummer/index.htm
Derby,
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/05_11_almostsummer/11.htm is IMO the
best of the bunch. It just works for me ;-).
Boris
On 18/11/05, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, please don't see it as an act of offense... Galia looked at the
picture and proclaimed: This is policeman grandmother..
I take no offence Boris, because I don't know what it means!!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Hi!
Taken this summer. The Denali Highway is a 135 mile stretch of dirt
road with virtually no services, yet wonderfully beautiful scenery.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3884295
Looks like a painted picture... Print it really big, Tom.
Boris
Hi!
Railroads are surprisingly easy to sabotage.
I'm sure that capturing reflected photons is gonna knock a whole bunch
of trains off the track.
Bill, it sure has to do with security, bit the real reason is unknown to me.
Boris
Hi!
Frame 4 (~100kb):
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/temp/xp2/xp2_4.html
Frame 7 (~80kb):
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/temp/xp2/xp2_7.html
Frame 9 (~90kb):
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/temp/xp2/xp2_9.html
Frame 7 is my favorite. In fact, I am considering enabling myself with
proper MF
Hi!
I take no offence Boris, because I don't know what it means!!
It means that whatever is on the picture happens to be a granny who also
works in law enforcement.
Boris
Bruce, i would crop the left slightly and darken it a bit. the light rock
draws attention away from the falls.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 2:04 AM
Subject: PESO - Falls
This was taken
Hi!
Does any of you knows where/if I can find a free manual for the Metz
45 CT1? Or - if you have this model - I need to know the purpose of
every connector (all the pins for those connectors) on the flash unit.
A wiring diagram would be very helpful :)
Thanks
--
Best regards,
Alex Sarbu
I would like the shadows a tiny bit deeper, would turn it a bit more
dramatic.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton
On 11/18/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill, it sure has to do with security, bit the real reason is unknown to me.
I've got a pretty good idea what the reason may be, but that would be
getting into a political discussion, which I really don't want to do
right now.
-frank
--
Dave Brooks poured salt in my wounds
when
he wrote what he did with the beer he and Frank
stole:
They have been sitting out by the vegy garden all summer. I'll bring them
back
next
June.:-)Although i
did borrowone to keep the potatoe bugs
On 11/18/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll have you know I fixed you both but good. I bought a case of Moosehead
today and
dumped it all down the toilet. Now we're even.
Tom (The Avenger) Reese
Does it sparkle now.LOL
Dave (Defender of ancient Technology)Brooks
On 11/18/05, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was taken at the beginning of this past summer up in the Sierra
Nevada mountains in northern California.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4, Tripod
ISO 400, 1/4 sec @ f/22, 45mm focal length
Converted from Raw using Capture One LE
On 11/18/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
And I still lust after that lens.
What body you gonna hang it on, Canon-girl? vbg
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 11/17/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.crumpler.com.au/b4b/
That was fun.
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 11/17/05, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nothing much to say, except I love the *istDS
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/05_11_almostsummer/index.htm
I hate you and your Southern Hemispheric ways.
We got a dusting of snow last night, and it was -5C this morning, with
a projected
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/17/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Railroads are surprisingly easy to sabotage.
Well then they should make it illegal to put bombs near railroad
tracks. I can't believe that photographing them has ever lead to
bombing them.
I wonder if
First let me say I am against the idea of passing laws against maybes.
Having said that, it does not take much imagination to see the glorious
leader pointing out to his paradise bound disciples, You want to place
your explosives here, and here, and here, pointing to the places on the
Just a bit of historical interest. Back in the 1960's the thing to do
was have an Exacta rotating eyecup adapted to your camera. Not only did
it have a place for a diopter, but the diopter rotated with the eyecup
so you could have your optician make one with astigmatism correction for
you. It
In a message dated 11/18/2005 5:18:44 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip
And I still lust after that lens.
What body you gonna hang it on, Canon-girl? vbg
-frank
Hehehehehe. That is why my lust remains unrequited.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
On 11/18/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frame 7 is my favorite. In fact, I am considering enabling myself with
proper MF gear, such as 645 and 75/2.8...
I'm with Boris on this one.
BTW, Boris, a real cheap way into MF would be with an old Yashicamat.
I think mine has an 80mm
On 18/11/05, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
I take no offence Boris, because I don't know what it means!!
It means that whatever is on the picture happens to be a granny who also
works in law enforcement.
Ah, she thinks he looks like an old lady dressed in a policeman's hat?
On 11/17/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17/11/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
You talkin' to me?
;-)
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare2.html
I used to have a mohawk, back in the day...
-frank bickle, ridding the cities of scum
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois
Op Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:40:49 +0100 schreef frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/18/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frame 7 is my favorite. In fact, I am considering enabling myself with
proper MF gear, such as 645 and 75/2.8...
I'm with Boris on this one.
I agree, though
graywolf wrote:
Just a bit of historical interest. Back in the 1960's the thing to do
was have an Exacta rotating eyecup adapted to your camera. Not only did
it have a place for a diopter, but the diopter rotated with the eyecup
so you could have your optician make one with astigmatism
graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First let me say I am against the idea of passing laws against maybes.
Having said that, it does not take much imagination to see the glorious
leader pointing out to his paradise bound disciples, You want to place
your explosives here, and here, and here,
frank theriault wrote:
I'm with Boris on this one.
BTW, Boris, a real cheap way into MF would be with an old Yashicamat.
I think mine has an 80mm f3.5 on it, and it's surprisingly sharp. You
can often pick up Mats with dead meters on eBay (not 124G's, but older
ones) for under $100...
Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax 645's with lens seem to cost between 250,- and 300,-. I thought
from the last time I looked that these camera's were at least twice that.
Is my memory deceiving me, or are prices for MF crashing?
Yes, medium format prices are plunging. Just
recommendations from a consortium of professional photographers
associations.
Herb
http://www.updig.org/guidelines/index.html
The price difference between RX500 and RX620 is about 15$ here. So it lookes
like RX620 is the one to go for.
Any other opinions on this?
I have been thinking a bit further. Will it do decent job with bw prints?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Mark Roberts wrote:
Yes, medium format prices are plunging. Just have a look through the
eBay Pentax medium format category. I found a 645 with 120 film insert
and 75mm lens for 375 USD buy it now price!
I've always tried to buy my 6x7 stuff from ebay in the run-up to
Op Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:18:20 +0100 schreef Mark Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax 645's with lens seem to cost between €250,- and €300,-. I thought
from the last time I looked that these camera's were at least twice
that.
Is my memory deceiving me,
Excellent info. Thanks Herb.
Paul
recommendations from a consortium of professional photographers
associations.
Herb
http://www.updig.org/guidelines/index.html
I think it would have been more fun stoned.
frank theriault wrote:
On 11/17/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.crumpler.com.au/b4b/
That was fun.
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
They be crashin'.
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:40:49 +0100 schreef frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/18/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frame 7 is my favorite. In fact, I am considering enabling myself with
proper MF gear, such as 645 and 75/2.8...
On 11/18/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry but I don't buy it.
Photographs of the WTC were of no help in this manner!
For suicide belt bombers, a hand-drawn sketch on the back of a napkin
is more than sufficient.
For attacks between these two extremes, published photos in
What the authorities are worried about are details that aren't
published. Recent changes, new security measures, photo reconnaissance
is very good at that. The fact that most photographs are useless in
that regard just means that they guard against everything. It's CYA in
many cases, after
On 11/18/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would have been more fun stoned.
I wouldn't know...
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Thanks Herb, I try that. I already cropped some off the left, but
I'll try a little more.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, November 18, 2005, 4:36:59 AM, you wrote:
HC Bruce, i would crop the left slightly and darken it a bit. the light rock
HC draws attention away from the falls.
HC Herb
Herb Chong wrote:
recommendations from a consortium of professional photographers
associations.
Herb
http://www.updig.org/guidelines/index.html
Herb - that's great _ thanks!
annsan
Hi all,
Today I did an experiment to check noise
at ISO 1600. I capped the lens, put the
camera in a black bag and made a series
of exposures 20, 40, 60 and 80 seconds.
But this is the interesting bit:
After the first exposure the shutter
wouldn't trip a second time. I took the
camera
I missed the beginning of this - but I have
successfully made an ebay
jewlery display by placing the jewelry direction
on a piece of polarized
material on the flat bed and leaving the lid up.
ann
Here's a stitched pano from my trip to Juneau, Alaska this past
summer. Haven't had much chance to work on it since I got back, but the
Hayes photo inspired me to put up something postable.
Not my first pano, but my first RAW-16-bit linear color-managed
workflow under linux. I'm not too
Tom C wrote:
The Milepost book is invaluable as Ann says.
When we went on the road it was pretty decent. Any kind of vehicle could
have made it.
We did it in a Suburu Loyale, to prove your point
- and that was in 1992.
ann :)
So it's been upgraded I guess. Still unpaved.
Several
Mark Roberts wrote:
Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been so busy with work for school projects that I've barely had any
time to shoot photos for myself lately. I managed to get a couple in
today. Two contrasting impressions of a fall day in the 'Burgh.
Unaware that you were doing a dark exposure, the camera takes another dark
exposure with same shutter speed as the original one for doing noise
correction.
This happens with any long exposure (1 sec and over?) if you set the noise
correction on.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Don
The camera's noise reduction software is telling it to make multiple exposures.
It takes quite a while to complete that process.
Paul
Hi all,
Today I did an experiment to check noise
at ISO 1600. I capped the lens, put the
camera in a black bag and made a series
of exposures 20, 40,
On Nov 18, 2005, at 6:40 AM, frank theriault wrote:
Frame 7 is my favorite. In fact, I am considering enabling myself
with
proper MF gear, such as 645 and 75/2.8...
I'm with Boris on this one.
BTW, Boris, a real cheap way into MF would be with an old Yashicamat.
I think mine has an 80mm
On Nov 18, 2005, at 1:33 AM, David Mann wrote:
I've been doing some more learning-the-hard-way. Today's lesson is
that when you shoot neg film to be cross-processed in E6,
overexpose it by a few stops. If I'd done some research prior to
shooting I'd have had better results. The film
Okay. So I make my exposure with no
light. Then, automatically, the camera
makes another. The second would be the
same, since the first was taken with
absolutely no light; one is subtracted
from the other -- leaving what? The 80
second exposure -- by the way -- was the
only one showing a
You can turn this feature off, there's a custom function called 'Noise
Reduction' that turns dark frame subtraction on and off.
-Adam
Don Williams wrote:
Okay. So I make my exposure with no light. Then, automatically, the
camera makes another. The second would be the same, since the first
Hi!
Supposedly they did. The real question is If they had been *prevented*
from taking pictures, how would that have helped us or hindered them?
Whenever I hear of photographers being hassled because they might
terrorists I think, OK, suppose I *am* a terrorist. Now I have a
picture of the
Hello Don,
The longer the sensor is on, the more thermal noise that is generated.
So the second frame may record the thermal noise and remove that from
the first exposure. This would give you a cleaner black image. The
assumption the camera can make is that the second exposure is supposed
to be
On Nov 18, 2005, at 11:42, Don Williams wrote:
Okay. So I make my exposure with no light. Then, automatically, the
camera makes another. The second would be the same, since the first
was taken with absolutely no light; one is subtracted from the
other -- leaving what?
Well, ideally -
You can turn off noise reduction if you want to get a real indication of
black noise.
rg
Don Williams wrote:
Okay. So I make my exposure with no light. Then, automatically, the
camera makes another. The second would be the same, since the first was
taken with absolutely no light; one is
Yes. I saw that when reading the manual
and forgot almost at once. There is a
lot to remember. Of course I didn't
register that the dark current exposure
would be the same length as the first
but logic dictates that it would be. But
long exposures hadn't entered my mind
until today.
So --
- Original Message -
I'll have you know I fixed you both but good. I bought a case of
Moosehead today and
dumped it all down the toilet. Now we're even.
Tom (The Avenger) Reese
How could you tell it actually made it into the toilet?
Christian
I'm a meany. I don't like waste. I can
use them in the flashes until they die.
D
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 18, 2005, at 11:42, Don Williams wrote:
Okay. So I make my exposure with no light. Then, automatically, the
camera makes another. The second would be the same, since the first
I've been there Boris (three times) and
I have very mixed feelings about the
whole situation. But this is not the
place to discuss them.
Don
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Supposedly they did. The real question is If they had been *prevented*
from taking pictures, how would that have helped us
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: PESO - Falls
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_1113a.htm
Comments welcome
Yer wasting your talents.
Get a view camera and shoot some sheet film.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: PESO(s): Two fall shots from Pittsburgh
Sorry but I don't buy it.
Photographs of the WTC were of no help in this manner!
For suicide belt bombers, a hand-drawn sketch on the back of a napkin
is more than sufficient.
For attacks
- Original Message -
From: Paul Ewins
Subject: RE: Cibachrome Exposure Monitor M-1
Does anybody have one of these or know how it works? I've bought one very
cheaply and I hope to use it for BW printing. It has an on/off switch,
two
red LEDs and a calibration dial marked from 0 to
Does fine with BW prints, and also with negatives.
Rick
--- Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The price difference between RX500 and RX620 is
about 15$ here. So it lookes
like RX620 is the one to go for.
Any other opinions on this?
I have been thinking a bit further. Will it do
Sorry, Ann, I'm missing something here!
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I missed the beginning of this - but I have
successfully made an ebay
jewlery display by placing the jewelry direction...
...jewelry direction?
...on a piece of polarized material...
Like what? Can you either be more generic or
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: Life is beautiful :-)
Sadly, my A24/2.8 sits mostly unused these days. While it is a focal
length I
adore on 35mm, it doesn't work well for me on the istD. Too bad, it is a
wonderful quality lens on the digital. I have the
Thanks again. I'm very near talking myself into this enablement.
And Cotty; if you're still with us, it will actually enable me ;-)
It will make me able to get the pictures outside the PC, and other pictures
the other way around.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Bruce Dayton Subject: PESO - Falls
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_1113a.htm
Comments welcome
Yer wasting your talents.
Get a view camera and shoot some sheet film.
William Robb
Going back thru some of your other images on
Returned to the state park with the circular dam from a while back,
decided to use a non fisheye to capture this.
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_circwfrev.html
Technical info:
Pentax *ist-D ISO 200 @ 1/20sec
smc Pentax-FA 20-35mm F4.0 AL @ f6.7
Notes: Couldn't decide if I
Hi!
I think it would be prudent to open a new thread...
What I was thinking of is a camera with standard lens, preferably fixed
lens. I have eyed some Fuji models. I want something that is reasonably
light, with good quality and reasonable versatility...
I think I can live with Pentax 645
Hi!
I've been there Boris (three times) and I have very mixed feelings about
the whole situation. But this is not the place to discuss them.
Do alert me when you are going to be coming next time...
Boris
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/photo/235239/index.en.html
What d'you say?
Boris
From another thread ...
On Nov 18, 2005, at 10:55 AM, William Robb wrote:
Sadly, my A24/2.8 sits mostly unused these days. ...
Interesting, my 31LTD was my most favoured lens pre-DSLR, now it
hardly sees
any use, same as my A20/2.8. ...
I use my 15/3.5 quite a bit, and then I seem to
Hello Boris,
Friday, November 18, 2005, 9:22:36 PM, you wrote:
BL Hi!
BL http://www.photoforum.ru/photo/235239/index.en.html
BL What d'you say?
BL Boris
Very simple and effective. The light is great, I like it overall.
Attila
One of the better floating debris shots I've seen.
I have to admit, however, I don't seek them out =)
Nicely exposed.
Jack
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/photo/235239/index.en.html
What d'you say?
Boris
On 18/11/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
And Cotty; if you're still with us, it will actually enable me ;-)
It will make me able to get the pictures outside the PC, and other pictures
the other way around.
opens eye
Mmmnnnffft?
closes same
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On Nov 18, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
What I was thinking of is a camera with standard lens, preferably
fixed lens. I have eyed some Fuji models. I want something that is
reasonably light, with good quality and reasonable versatility...
...
As for what Frank suggested... I've
Interesting subject, lively, and with strong contrasts.
But (seems to always have a but in my comments lately) a counter clockwise
tilt would have got the grey distracting concrete (or whatever it is) out of
frame. A step to the left may also have made it better.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: lenses, lens use, and DA14 samples
I find that most of the time now I use the FA20-35 in preference to the
A24/2.8. Their performance is quite comparable, in my opinion, although
the prime does have a decent edge. The A24 is
On 11/18/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The YashicaMat 124G was a decent camera ... I seem to recall that the
earlier ones had a 4-element Tessar type lens, where the last series
had been cost-reduced with a relatively poor Triotar type design.
Mine was 1981 vintage and was
Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Supposedly they did. The real question is If they had been *prevented*
from taking pictures, how would that have helped us or hindered them?
Whenever I hear of photographers being hassled because they might
terrorists I think, OK, suppose I *am* a
Nice idea, Godfrey, to share those samples.
I wasn't yet very used to the A20mm on film when I switched to digital and
it became a 30mm-lens. So looking at your pics I see that my decision to go
with the 16-45 zoom as wide-angle lens was right - just for me. 16mm resp.
24mm on 35-film is just
I'm on my way to something else, but just got to say:
Coke adds life. (?)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman
Boris Liberman wrote:
http://www.photoforum.ru/photo/235239/index.en.html
What d'you say?
The water's wonderful. So's the composition.
Jolly good shot!
Stephen
The perfect revenge for anyone whose been ripped off. Its a long read
but it keeps getting better and better
http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=399203
Well, the 24mm and 50mm on a APS-C DSLR equates to the classic Leica kit
of a 35mm and 75mm. So I'd tend to agree with that. I'd personally go
for a 16mm and the 50mm, but I do like the 24mm and 100mm combination on
35mm.
-Adam
Bernd Scheffler wrote:
Nice idea, Godfrey, to share those
Hi all.
Just picked up some 3200 i shot at the Royal Winter Fair Nov 4th. I normally
shoot this at
6400 at the
fair for higher Tv speeds,or 3200 if doing band shots.
I labled the canister at iso 6400 and told the clerk that i needed it push 1
stop.
When i went to the store one
Kodak publishes development specs for various TMax 3200 ratings, ranging from
800 to 6400. I suppose one could say it's actually an ISO 800 film, but that
would be splitting hairs. I have used it quite often at 3200 with good success,
although I find it looks much better at 1600. I don't like
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Kodak Tmax 3200 question
When i went to the store one of the lab people served me and mentioned
that i put down
push 1 stop
when infact i should have said 2 stops.He said this is because the film is
actually rated
at 1600.
So now i'm
I always adjust my processing time via trial/error based on a given
ISO on a given film until I get the density right.
I basically ignore the recommendations on any mfgr time
tables except as a basic starting point for experimentation.
In other words, if you were getting excellent results with
The nominal ISO for TMZ 3200 is about ISO1600. But any lab should be
developing it by default for the DX coded speed, not the nominal ISO.
So the lab guy is being dumb, even if he's technically right.
-Adam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Just picked up some 3200 i shot
Has there been any word of improvements to the Pentax Auto Focus?
Can we expect something fast and acurate?
Kind regards
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
On 11/18/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/photo/235239/index.en.html
What d'you say?
Doesn't work for me. Don't know why, it just doesn't.
I think if it were BW...
g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
I've been reading again.
This time it's an article (What's New With Zooms) in the Dec '05
issue of Outdoor Photographer.
Five categories of zooms are grouped and, among other stats, identifies
which have at least on element of Aspherical/Special Glass. An
article foot note explains that special
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
