Hi Shel,
The video is great (the presentation grates the nerves a bit) but I like
the step by step approach that leaves nothing out.
Don
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Because of the greater DOF from the APS-C sized sensor, and the sometimes
slower lenses available for digital cameras, this filter
David Mann wrote:
On Aug 13, 2006, at 2:43 PM, William Robb wrote:
Isn't there some sort of rule that when Hitler gets mentioned, the
arguement is over, the battle lost?
Godwin's Law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
- Dave
Good call!
--
keith whaley
--
PDML
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another bit of liberal nonsense :-)
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isn't there some sort of rule that when Hitler gets mentioned, the
arguement is over, the battle lost?
Not quite so, Paul...
The
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 22:59:20 +0100, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: Another Blow Against Photography
Removing the conditions that lead to terrorism is another way. That
is
the lesson learned from Northern Ireland and it
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 00:11:21 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Utter nonsense. Blaming radical behavior on poverty and bad conditions
is the old liberal excuse for everyone who can't behave. It no longer
holds water.
Really? Why?
Never has.
Really again??
Is that why Hitler wanted to
A bit too light on mine -
YOu struck terror into my heart with this one, Paul
please tell me they are not tearing down the Best Western
Inn of Chicago,
nee , the ST Claire Hotel. The first home I remember.
In my neighborhood, I have to navigate around one like this
to get to the recent
happy
Hi Ann,
Yes, I'll have to look at this on my home monitor. I think the St. Claire is
still intact. I'll try to look. I'm going out for a walk this morning. Then
it's a Sox game this afternoon and back to Michigan tonight.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Ann
I took the big gun down to Don's Photo yesterday to try out the K100D.
It's a nice little camera, though not up to the finish if the istD.
I was primarily interested in seeing if the antishake worked, so I did a
couple of shots for comparative purposes.
Both pictures were shot with the A600/5.6
A significant difference to be sure. I'd love to see more tests, perhaps with
some subject where it's easy to determine what the focal point was and with the
stop set at 5.6.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I took the big gun
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Antishake, Pentax style
A significant difference to be sure. I'd love to see more tests,
perhaps with some subject where it's easy to determine what the focal
point was and with the stop set at 5.6.
Hmmm, I think I can mount
I'm impressed for 2 reasons.
1. In camera shake reduction looks to work very well,
2. You can hand hold that lens.
Dave
On 8/13/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took the big gun down to Don's Photo yesterday to try out the K100D.
It's a nice little camera, though not up to the
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Antishake, Pentax style
I'm impressed for 2 reasons.
1. In camera shake reduction looks to work very well,
2. You can hand hold that lens.
The construction work seems to be keeping me in pretty good shape. The
600 wasn't all
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:54:11 +0100, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm impressed for 2 reasons.
1. In camera shake reduction looks to work very well,
2. You can hand hold that lens.
2 follows from 1.
John
Dave
On 8/13/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took the big
The issues there are the same as they are elsewhere. The people who want
power over others can not get it in a free election, so they will do it
with whatever means is at hand. One of the most noticeable things about
terrorism is that their leaders are not the ones doing it. If they were
it
John Forbes wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 22:59:20 +0100, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: Another Blow Against Photography
Removing the conditions that lead to terrorism is another way. That
is
the lesson learned from
Yes, Bob, that is why a multi-millionaire becomes a terrorist leader.
Seems like he could do better spreading some of that money around
amongst the poor. The fact is, the poor are hardly ever revolutionists,
they are too busy trying to put food in their children's mouths to get
involved. It is
John Forbes wrote:
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:54:11 +0100, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm impressed for 2 reasons.
1. In camera shake reduction looks to work very well,
2. You can hand hold that lens.
2 follows from 1.
John
Not exactly, the 600 is big enough that many
Any comments on AF and buffer and RAW write speed?
Given the price, this camera should be a killer.
John
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:55:27 +0100, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Antishake, Pentax style
A significant
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: Antishake, Pentax style
Any comments on AF and buffer and RAW write speed?
I only had a few minutes (my wife gets twitchy in camera stores) and a
32mb card. I'll definitely play with it some more on Monday.
Given the price, this
Point taken; I've just looked up the weight. 6,800 kgs.
John
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:33:31 +0100, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:54:11 +0100, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm impressed for 2 reasons.
1. In camera shake reduction
But unless the fomenters have a broad base of support, they will get
nowhere.
It is a perception of injustice on the part of a large proportion of the
population that allows a revolutionary/resistance/terrorist movement to
flourish.
John
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:35:14 +0100, graywolf [EMAIL
On Aug 13, 2006, at 11:02 AM, John Forbes wrote:
Point taken; I've just looked up the weight. 6,800 kgs.
Ummm, lessee, you use how many tripods with that?
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
as somebody else pointed out (possibly you) it's not the
multi-millionaires who are blowing themselves up. They are
power-mongers who take advantage of the grievances of the ordinary
people to convince a small number of deluded people into blowing
themselves and others up. The British and other
On Aug 12, 2006, at 7:22 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The Fuji F30 I ordered just arrived. ...
Make sure to post some high-ISO samples!
Copying this response to a couple other of my photo mailing lists so
for context ...
Long and short of it is that I decided to give the Fuji F30 a try,
- Original Message -
From: Bob Shell
Subject: Re: Antishake, Pentax style
On Aug 13, 2006, at 11:02 AM, John Forbes wrote:
Point taken; I've just looked up the weight. 6,800 kgs.
Ummm, lessee, you use how many tripods with that?
Or one badass Canadian...
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: Antishake, Pentax style
Point taken; I've just looked up the weight. 6,800 kgs.
My word, and little old me can handhold it.
You want to get in shape, become a contractor.
HAR!!!
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Russell Brown is one of those guys that has the gift of clearly
explaining relatively complex topics. Combine this with his knowledge
of Photoshop and you have a guy that can create excellent tutorials
His style is a bit odd. He reminds me a bit of a combination of Mr.
Rogers and Bill Nye the
Slight confusion with the units there! But even at 6,800 gms it's heavy.
John
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:01:41 +0100, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: Antishake, Pentax style
Point taken; I've just looked up the weight.
On Aug 13, 2006, at 8:15, William Robb wrote:
Both pictures were shot with the A600/5.6 handheld. I wasn't making a
really scientific thing out of it, so I left the camera on program,
and
let it do it's thing. I suspect the shutter speed was close to 1/500,
but the EXIF data is missing this
Bill and all -
I had an interesting Anti-shake experience last weekend.
I've mentioned before that I teach photography classes at the local
community college. In the basic class I connect the AV output of a
point and shoot camera to the classroom video projector. This allows
the group to see
Set this up with the sun hitting the blossom and a black valuer
background cloth draped over a chair back. The lens, of course,
protected by being shaded from the sun.
DOF vs image size always an issue on macros.
OK, so I atomized it a squirt. ;-)
MZ-S (manual), A*100 f/2.8 mac., Provia 100F,
On Aug 13, 2006, at 12:55 PM, George Sinos wrote:
Now that Sony and Samsung have Anti-shake camera bodies, I'm guessing
Canon and Nikon will, at least, need to put it in their entry level
bodies. In a couple of years, selling a consumer camera with out
Anti-shake will be like trying to sell
I seem to remember Minolta branded AF binoculars on the market several
years back.
Hadn't remembered that 'til now, and that may be due to their lack of
acceptance.(?)
Jack
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 13, 2006, at 12:55 PM, George Sinos wrote:
Now that Sony and Samsung
On Aug 13, 2006, at 2:06 PM, Bob Shell wrote:
Like most of Nikon's point and shoot film cameras, it was
actually made by a company called Goko.
I saw the Goko catalog of cameras you could buy and have branded as
your own (if purchasing in enough quantity) a handful of times -- the
gag
Dunno why I like this shot, but I do.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/214316721/
For non-flickr users who want to see it large:
http://static.flickr.com/82/214316721_56ab47b2d4_b.jpg
LX, Kiron 28/2, Acros 100 in Rodinal 1:50.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 11:22:15AM -0700, Jack Davis wrote:
I seem to remember Minolta branded AF binoculars on the market several
years back.
Hadn't remembered that 'til now, and that may be due to their lack of
acceptance.(?)
Jack
I've still got a pair somewhere - I think they're 10x50s.
I imagine she's right, what with that light gathering glass and
mechanism.
Two 7x30's made of some modern alloy could be worn as earrings. :)
Jack
--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 11:22:15AM -0700, Jack Davis wrote:
I seem to remember Minolta branded AF
William Robb wrote:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/antishake/
Wow.
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I've just looked up the weight. 6,800 kgs.
That's the weight of the 600 FA, times 1000.
The A 600 f5.6 is listed as 3280g.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 11:02 AM
Pretty impressive.
Would boost my numbers of keepers.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 9:15 AM
Subject: Antishake, Pentax style
I took the big gun down to Don's Photo yesterday to
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 07:37:39PM -0400, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I've just looked up the weight. 6,800 kgs.
That's the weight of the 600 FA, times 1000.
Not everybody uses the same decimal point indicator ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I have just learned something about it that pretty much seals the deal
-- I'll be buying it if I have to sell a kidney to do it. It addresses
my most basic complaint about digital. It's a feature that's so much
of a no-brainer, and yet as far as I know not a single DSLR out there
at any
On 8/13/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just learned something about it that pretty much seals the
deal
There's a take the picture the way I want it to come out mode?
-Mat
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
WTF?!?
Aaron, you can't write a post like that and then not spill the beans.
;-)
Dave
On 8/14/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just learned something about it that pretty much seals the deal
-- I'll be buying it if I have to sell a kidney to do it. It addresses
my most
Ah, Aaron, this is like putting the presents under the
Christmas tree and jiggling them, and not letting us open the
box!
Let's see, are cameras WIFI yet? Solar operated no need of
batteries?
Dave
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just learned something about it that
Yes, but at least you don't need a freight car to transport the lens
Butch
Slight confusion with the units there! But even at 6,800 gms it's heavy.
John
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:01:41 +0100, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Subject: Re:
Thanks Marnie. Had a lot of fun shooting in Chicago today. I'll post
some more soon.
Paul
On Aug 12, 2006, at 2:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/11/2006 7:51:01 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm in Chicago. I was shooting on the street, and these two
Rest easy Ann. The St. Claire Hotel (now a Best Western Inn) is alive
and well on Chicago's Ohio Street. Shot it this morning on my way to
breakfast. No room to shoot on the narrow street, so I used the DA
12-24/4 at 12mm focal length, f11 @1/180th, ISO200. Did some
perspective correction
William Robb wrote:
I took the big gun down to Don's Photo yesterday to try out the K100D.
It's a nice little camera, though not up to the finish if the istD.
I was primarily interested in seeing if the antishake worked, so I did a
couple of shots for comparative purposes.
Both pictures
Great! Now we're all completely tortured. My buddy
just did this to me over the Xeon powered Pro Macs
that were just announced...now I get to wait all over
again.
Sheesh!
How about a hint?
-Brendan
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just learned something about it that pretty
You get used to it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/9/2006 8:58:48 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Our dog Dot, a Blue Heeler, after a romp in the water.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4776813
Tom C.
===
Very nice shot -- good portrait. BTW,
There seems to be a menu item for entering the lens' focal length. I've
only seen pictures of the Japanese ideographs so I don't know more than
that.
Bengt Falke wrote:
In our Canon S3 IS there is a setting for when it is used together with
a converter in font of the lens so I guess that the
Had to be away for a few days, but I did see a few interesting images.
http://www.mindspring.com/~megazip/PESO_--_mockamphora.html
Technical Information:
None, it's late and I'm tired and I'm going to bed.
As usual comments are welcome, but may be totally ignored.,
--
When you're worried or
Intriguing. I await more information ... ;-)
Godfrey
On Aug 13, 2006, at 6:01 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
I have just learned something about it that pretty much seals the deal
-- I'll be buying it if I have to sell a kidney to do it. It
addresses
my most basic complaint about digital.
http://www.mindspring.com/~megazip/PESO_--_natureneedsacrutch.html
Folding Beach Chair$25.00 at Job Lot.
Aluminum Side Table $59.95 at IKEA.
Sunburst Ornament $21.99 at Pier One.
Crutch to keep that pesky branch out of your face, priceless...
No technical data, it's late I'm tired and
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Rest easy Ann. The St. Claire Hotel (now a Best Western Inn) is alive
and well on Chicago's Ohio Street. Shot it this morning on my way to
breakfast. No room to shoot on the narrow street, so I used the DA
12-24/4 at 12mm focal length, f11 @1/180th, ISO200. Did some
On 8/14/06, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4802834
Well done, Paul.
That's a skill I need to develop!
I can't derive the data from your photo, but may I assume it was taken with a
*ist-D?
And if so, on that body,
Well, *my* biggest complaint about digital SLRs is the susceptibility
to dust. A sensor with in-camera SR has an obvious approach to this
problem; shake the sensor very fast to shake the dust off. This is
used in the Olympus E-series bodies, and also in the new Sony A100
(which uses the 10.2MP
59 matches
Mail list logo
