Ooops! Ta for the correction.
On 14/02/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Featherstone wrote:
Forward the whole email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I think that's the right
address)
Cheers,
Eric.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It was WR, in respect of the MZ-S. A sneezing hamster.
From: John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/13 Tue PM 11:37:13 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: *ist D Oh so quiet!
A minor point, but I had to use the *ist D to shoot some products for my
other half yesterday and noticed
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/13 Tue PM 11:45:50 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Is This A Scam?
Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 13/02/07, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest you do not even open or click anything. Even
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, John Whittingham wrote:
dont be confused by the K24/2.8. It'not a real
K lens, its just a later M lens they didnt designate
as M because of the size. The real K24 is the original
K24, the K24/3.5.
Well, now you've told me something there, I never knew. Thanks John.
I
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/14 Wed AM 02:43:06 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Over There
In a message dated 2/13/2007 4:06:04 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Starting today, if I can't say something nice, I won't say anything at all.
Hi Bruce,
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:18:58 -0800, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I would be curious as to how it works. Is it something you slide on
and off or leave on all the time?
See the magnifying eyecup mounted on the K10D here:
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?list=19
It replaces
It was WR, in respect of the MZ-S. A sneezing hamster.
That was it a sneezing hamster, great description 8)
John
The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is
John, I've used ME Super, MZ-6, *istD, a little bit MZ-S and PZ-1
and I find K10D to be the quietest shutter among all of the above.
Mine definitely has a deeper more cavenous sound, to me it seems more
intrusive than the *ist D, I first noticed it shooting at 1/100 sec, maybe
I'm hearing SR
Another portrait of a friends daughter. I caught her in a moment of
wonder...
http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/PESO_--_wonder.html
Nice shot, the eyes say it all for me.
John
The
As do I.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:57:44PM -0500, David J Brooks wrote:
I find it the other way John
Dave
Strange, maybe I just perceive it as louder, it seems more intrusive. Having
said that, most of my shots have been at slow shutter speeds with SR enabled.
Or maybe I've got a
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, John Whittingham wrote:
dont be confused by the K24/2.8. It'not a real
K lens, its just a later M lens they didnt designate
as M because of the size. The real K24 is the original
K24, the K24/3.5.
Well, now you've told me something there, I never knew. Thanks
On 2/14/07, John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As do I.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:57:44PM -0500, David J Brooks wrote:
I find it the other way John
Dave
Strange, maybe I just perceive it as louder, it seems more intrusive. Having
said that, most of my shots have been at
I agree that the K10D is quieter than the D. I can tell by how many
times I get caught shooting pics in coffee shops:-). But when I want to
be really hushed, I pull out my Leica iiif RD. It's even quiet for a
Leica, as it was apparently lubed generously at its last CLS. I've used
it at piano
Didn't know they had that type of design back then, always thought that
was more of a modern design. Nice. I notice on Boj's site that the
resolution numbers are slightly better for the m, so I suppose the
compromises they made were well done. Perhaps it is not quite as good
wide open? As
On 2/13/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Any one have any favorite clip art sites, or gif sites.
I'll start searching, but if anyone has a fav, i'll try it.
Please post them to the list! I could use them for my multimedia
authoring class.
Station has asked
I forget How do we describe the 6x7 mirror slap.
Train, dump truck, camel sneezing???:-)
Dave
On 2/14/07, John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John, I've used ME Super, MZ-6, *istD, a little bit MZ-S and PZ-1
and I find K10D to be the quietest shutter among all of the above.
Mine
I forget How do we describe the 6x7 mirror slap.
Train, dump truck, camel sneezing???:-)
8)
The 645 is bad enough.
John
The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom
I agree that the K10D is quieter than the D. I can tell by how many
times I get caught shooting pics in coffee shops:-).
Must be my mind playing tricks on me then. I'm not about to get them side by
side and test them, I'm too busy right now.
John
I just triggered my *istD K10D beside each other and the D is
somewhat noisier.
Fair enough, I can't really argue with that. I've also noticed a slight
err...after shock with the K10D as if something happens after the
shutter/mirror, SR settling back in rest position?!
John
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: *ist D Oh so quiet!
It was WR, in respect of the MZ-S. A sneezing hamster.
It was Wendy Beard, though she tried to blame it on Peter from Camera
Direct.
You've tried to pin that one on me, but I didn't find my name on any direct
Thanks Marcus, Bruce, and Marnie.
This is turning out to be a tougher subject than I
expected. I took about 30 frames Monday, with the
fisheye, the 16-45, and the 50/1.7.
The space is tough, and the available angles are
restricted by an ugly modern building on one side, and
an old mansion
This would convert nicely to BW, and the distraction
of the figure on her T shirt would disappear.
Nice shot!
Rick
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another portrait of a friends daughter. I caught
her in a moment of
wonder...
This would convert nicely to BW, and the distraction
of the figure on her T shirt would disappear.
Nice shot!
Rick
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another portrait of a friends daughter. I caught
her in a moment of
wonder...
David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5593883
Nothing special, just thought this one a bit cutzie. The first thing
that hit me was the birds looking at the sign.
K10D, K400 in AV mode, lightroom DNG adjusted and sharpend in PS.
Dave
BTW i did count close
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, John Whittingham wrote:
I just checked Boz's site, indeed it was made 1977-84, definitely in the M
era, the appearance has more of the black of the K than any of my M lenses
which appear blue/black in my collection.
Yes, but how about the engraving at the front.
Kostas
Minor seismic event.
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/14 Wed PM 01:18:23 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: *ist D Oh so quiet!
I forget How do we describe the 6x7 mirror slap.
Train, dump truck, camel sneezing???:-)
Dave
On 2/14/07,
You must have used it a lot afterwards for it to stick in my mind. 8-)
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/14 Wed PM 01:57:35 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: *ist D Oh so quiet!
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re:
I was wondering if i should have titled it Are we children?
Dave
On 2/14/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5593883
Nothing special, just thought this one a bit cutzie. The first thing
that hit me was the birds
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: *ist D Oh so quiet!
You must have used it a lot afterwards for it to stick in my mind. 8-)
Funny man.
I have my email archived back to June 1999.
I've never used the word sneeze in an email to the PDML.
William Robb
--
PDML
Now you did, Bill ;-).
On 2/14/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: *ist D Oh so quiet!
You must have used it a lot afterwards for it to stick in my mind. 8-)
Funny man.
I have my email archived back to June 1999.
I've
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Re: *ist D Oh so quiet!
Now you did, Bill ;-).
Drats.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 2/13/2007 8:15:39 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another portrait of a friends daughter. I caught her in a moment of
wonder...
http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/PESO_--_wonder.html
Technical Data:
Pentax *ist-Ds ISO 3200 @ 60sec
Vivitar vmc
Yes, but how about the engraving at the front.
Kostas
Can you be more specific?
John
The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed and may contain
Yes, but how about the engraving at the front.
Kostas
--
Ah yes, looks like the M series, came with the K front cap though and fitted
case.
John
The information transmitted is
In a message dated 2/13/2007 5:06:25 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5593883
Nothing special, just thought this one a bit cutzie. The first thing
that hit me was the birds looking at the sign.
K10D, K400 in AV mode, lightroom
In a message dated 2/14/2007 12:44:04 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 2/13/2007 4:06:04 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Starting today, if I can't say something nice, I won't say anything at
all.
William Robb
Is the adaptor readlily available out there.
Dave
On 2/13/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Canon 5D with the addition of a $10 adaptor is for all intents and
purposes a M42 DSLR. All it's missing is the metering stop-down button.
-Adam
Who shoots M42 on Canon EOS with his ST's
Burned up an hour on the way to work this morning only to find out
that work started late anyway due to the ice.
http://www.ee.vt.edu/~mythtv/PESO/6/
-Cory
--
*
* Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA
Good shot. Nice use of the fence line in composition. And it's always good to h
ave a layer of ice under your snow. Makes for more exciting travel:=)
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Burned up an hour on the way to work
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/14 Wed PM 03:03:50 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: *ist D Oh so quiet!
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: *ist D Oh so quiet!
You must have used it a lot afterwards for it
In a message dated 2/13/2007 6:23:53 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You'll find it here: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?
O=productlistA=detailsQ=sku=469574is=REG
On Feb 13, 2007, at 8:35 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
==
That's cool and what I
In a message dated 2/13/2007 11:00:49 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks Marnie.
If adding contrast would only sharpen and have no negative side effect I
would probably do it more.
Maybe I just need more photoshopping experience, I see a loss of detail if I
increase
Funny man.
I have my email archived back to June 1999.
I've never used the word sneeze in an email to the PDML.
William Robb
I wouldn't have said all those things.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Yes. They're all over eBay. Mine cost be about $25CDN after shipping
Commonly available adaptors for EOS mount are: OM, M42, Nikon F,
Contax/Yashica and Leica R. The last two often have mirror clearance
issues though and the C/Y adaptors sometimes don't get to infinity. Some
people outdo Cotty
In a message dated 2/13/2007 11:23:48 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The second original color version can be seen in it's nearly full beauty
of 2024x1400 pixel for some days at www.mypage.bluewin.ch/solicom.
Just click on the thumbnail of 512x512 pixel for the full
On 2/14/07, Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Burned up an hour on the way to work this morning only to find out
that work started late anyway due to the ice.
http://www.ee.vt.edu/~mythtv/PESO/6/
Nice shot, Cory. That's some great lighting in the clouds.
-Mat
--
PDML
Nice converging lines example, as it was referred to in photo class.
Well done DOF, also, well chosen woolly sky adds interest.
Jack
--- Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Burned up an hour on the way to work this morning only to find out
that work started late anyway due to the
Hi Rick,
My suggestion would be far less DOF. Probably to the point where we could
just detect that there were other headstones. I think the subject matter
has a lot of potential. The background seems to be cluttered and I find my
self straining to read it.
BTW, people are just dying to
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Burned up an hour on the way to work this morning only to find out
that work started late anyway due to the ice.
http://www.ee.vt.edu/~mythtv/PESO/6/
-Cory
that's a hell of a shot, Cory.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I was going to label this whee, but actually it's post whee.
Taken at White Sands, New Mexico. The only place I have ever seen people
playing in the sand this way. The only place I have seen sand like that --
sand
that was in dunes high enough and firm enough that one could do this.
Made
Boris,
Nice colors, nice light, but for me the composition is
unbalanced, with too much on the right.
Rick
On 2/10/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16638full=1
Funny. I found it to be pleasingly composed, roughly following the rule
Said Tom, gravely...
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, people are just dying to get in there.
Tom C.
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
Have a burning question?
Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com
look at the font of the front lettering
on the k 24/2.8 lens. It does not
match all the other K lenses and looks
the same as the m series lenses fonts.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Whittingham
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007
Meant to say read it (the headstone engraving).
Tom C.
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Tree in Cemetery 2
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:38:21 -0700
Hi Rick,
My suggestion would be far less DOF. Probably to the
Beautiful!
We have two inches of slush in Philly, which isn't
very photogenic.
Rick
--- Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Burned up an hour on the way to work this morning
only to find out
that work started late anyway due to the ice.
http://www.ee.vt.edu/~mythtv/PESO/6/
Excellent photo! Very nice.
We got about four inches of snow yesterday. It turned to sleet last
night. We got about two inches of that on top of the snow. Freezing
rain this morning. Now it's snowing again. PennDot apparently has no
snow plows. Or maybe they're all broken. Regardless,
I think the main advantage of the floating
element design is better performance at
close focus range ( all focus distances
equally good, instead of optimized for
infinity for example).
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Weiss
it should be noted these adapaters will NOT
make the canon EOS into M42 DSLRS I was talking
about because they dont support the auto aperture
M42 lenses auto aperture function. Its very slow
and cumbersome to use them manually. There is
no need to even use Canon for them, you can do
the same thing
I believe he is mistaken, you cannot get a M42
adapter that does auto aperture on M42 lenses
and thats what I was talking about, a M42
DSLR that has a real M42 mount and supports
auto apeture M42 lenses fully like most M42
film cameras did.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I love the sky and fence-induced perspective. The half tree on the left
border distracts me. If the entire tree was was visible and there weren't
other distracting elements brought in to the frame it may be even better.
Tom C.
From: Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss
Said Tom, gravely...
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, people are just dying to get in there.
Tom C.
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new
A really fun shot would be in the middle of a whoops - flipping over -
or a really low angle on the middle of the whee. Looks fun,
nonetheless.
I would have to guess that you being a woman would have better luck
taking pictures of someone else's children without being harassed than
I would. I'm
I really like this one. Having been in Kansas City for about 10 years
and living through a number of ice storms, I feel that you really have
portrayed this well.
The lines of the road and fence draw your eye right down to the
menacing clouds. The fence is close enough to see the coating of ice
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:02:05AM +0100, Jan van Wijk wrote:
See the magnifying eyecup mounted on the K10D here:
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?list=19
Actually, since the eyecup is several mm's thicker than
the standard one, it keeps my nose a bit further away
from the
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I really like this one. Having been in Kansas City for about 10 years
and living through a number of ice storms, I feel that you really have
portrayed this well.
The lines of the road and fence draw your eye right down to the
menacing clouds. The
I have noticed that - the K10D sounds not unlike the infamous hamster
sneeze, produced by the MZ-S, but without the film advance sound.
The *ist D has a very pleasant sound IMO - that is as long as you don't put
your ear very close to the camera body
Regards
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting
Your camera would have hated it! :-((
Looks to me like more fun than snow. I like his isolation and happy
facial whee.
Center location is exactly right, in this case, IMHO.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was going to label this whee, but actually it's post whee.
Taken at White Sands,
Would the D sound more like a Panda's sneeze?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzRH3iTQPrk
On 2/14/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have noticed that - the K10D sounds not unlike the infamous hamster
sneeze, produced by the MZ-S, but without the film advance sound.
The *ist D has a
On 2/14/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: *ist D Oh so quiet!
You must have used it a lot afterwards for it to stick in my mind. 8-)
Funny man.
I have my email archived back to June 1999.
I've never used the word
Love itvery foreboding.
Norm
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Burned up an hour on the way to work this morning only to find out
that work started late anyway due to the ice.
http://www.ee.vt.edu/~mythtv/PESO/6/
-Cory
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The notion of close range correction for ultrawides by using floating
elements was certainly first on the market in the 1960s ... I have
been under the impression that the Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 was the first
in this genre (released in 1967) and that all others followed it to
market.
A short
In a message dated 2/14/2007 9:40:26 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A really fun shot would be in the middle of a whoops - flipping over -
or a really low angle on the middle of the whee. Looks fun,
nonetheless.
I would have to guess that you being a woman would have
In a message dated 2/14/2007 9:56:52 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your camera would have hated it! :-((
Looks to me like more fun than snow. I like his isolation and happy
facial whee.
Center location is exactly right, in this case, IMHO.
Jack
=
Thanks,
Doug Brewer wrote:
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Burned up an hour on the way to work this morning only to find out
that work started late anyway due to the ice.
http://www.ee.vt.edu/~mythtv/PESO/6/
-Cory
that's a hell of a shot, Cory.
what Doug said :)
ann
--
PDML
Starting today, if I can't say something nice, I won't say anything at
all.
A constructive comment would be nice. ;+]
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - Over There
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
It looks very similar to the first shot. You need to get in there and
change your angle of view, field of view, etc. Find a time when the
light does something magical. Render it to BW. Play... :-)
G
On Feb 13, 2007, at 6:09 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
I took Monday off (having worked all
I am not mistaken. I never claimed the adaptor does auto-aperture (Hence
the note about the lack of stop-down metering switch, which also uses
the auto-aperture function).
-Adam
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I believe he is mistaken, you cannot get a M42
adapter that does auto aperture on M42
Wow, a really nice shot Cory! Great sky good subject.
If it were mine, I'd probably crop out the tree @ the LH edge.
Good work.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Winter Ice Storm Warning PESO
Burned up an hour on the way to work
LOL ... That's a great clip! :-)
Wow, a thread discussing the quality of a hamster sneeze vs a Panda
sneeze...
The *ist DS goes clack. The K10D goes schick-ack.
G
On Feb 14, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Perry Pellechia wrote:
Would the D sound more like a Panda's sneeze?
On Feb 14, 2007, at 8:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/whee.htm
I like it a lot! It might have been even better if you caught him a
little more to the bottom of the frame, but the expression is wonderful.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Actually, since the Canon's do continuous metering in Manual and
Aperture Priority along with TTL flash (including wireless multi-group
flash) they're more functional than Pentax DSLR's with M42 lenses (which
offer metering only via the green button hack or DoF preview and no TTL
flash with
Here we go. We're gonna get buried in puns.
Said Tom, gravely...
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, people are just dying to get in there.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 2/14/2007 10:33:32 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like it a lot! It might have been even better if you caught him a
little more to the bottom of the frame, but the expression is wonderful.
Godfrey
Thanks, Godfrey. :-)
I liked his
On Feb 14, 2007, at 7:56 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Burned up an hour on the way to work this morning only to find out
that work started late anyway due to the ice.
http://www.ee.vt.edu/~mythtv/PESO/6/
Excellent shot... Crop the left off from the edge of the road and I
think the
That would be a sad undertaking.
Tom C.
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here we go. We're gonna get buried in puns.
Said Tom, gravely...
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, people are just dying to get in there.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
My son-in-law has a Nikon AF2020 body absolutely new in the box. He wonders if
it has collectable value. All the cards, etc are in the box. No lens has ever
been mounted and the body cap is in place. I don't know who to ask other than
the good Pentaxians Thanks, Bill Lawlor
--
PDML
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Adam Maas wrote:
Pentax DSLR's with M42 lenses (which
offer metering only via the green button hack or DoF preview
Is that true with M42s? I thought that it meters fully in Av mode
without any user intervention.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Could you sense my shiver?
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/14/2007 9:56:52 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your camera would have hated it! :-((
Looks to me like more fun than snow. I like his isolation and happy
facial whee.
Center
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: *ist D Oh so quiet!
I've never used the word sneeze in an email to the PDML.
My apologies.
It's funny, I checked the archives, and the term sneezing hamster seems to
have entered the PDML lexicon through the back door. I
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Pentax K 28mm f2.0 Lens
I am not mistaken. I never claimed the adaptor does auto-aperture (Hence
the note about the lack of stop-down metering switch, which also uses
the auto-aperture function).
Another case of thread hijacking?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT New NAF2020
My son-in-law has a Nikon AF2020 body absolutely new in the box. He
wonders if it has collectable value. All the cards, etc are in the box. No
lens has ever been mounted and the body cap is in place. I don't
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Adam Maas wrote:
Pentax DSLR's with M42 lenses (which
offer metering only via the green button hack or DoF preview
Is that true with M42s? I thought that it meters fully in Av mode
without any user intervention.
Kostas
Sort of. It
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 06:58:27PM +, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Adam Maas wrote:
Pentax DSLR's with M42 lenses (which
offer metering only via the green button hack or DoF preview
Is that true with M42s? I thought that it meters fully in Av mode
without any
Many comments have complimented you for living at a nice place. It is
obvious you do. But I don't think that's all. You have a good eye, and you
use it well.
But where's the potatoes?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, he just doesnt understand how user friendly
automatic aperture M42 lenses can be and that
a Canon with a M42 adapter is not even close
to what a properly designed M42 DSLR would
be like to use. And he DID state that all the
Canon setup would be missing is a metering
button of some sort - W R O
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My son-in-law has a Nikon AF2020 body absolutely new in the box. He wonders
if it has collectable value. All the cards, etc are in the box. No lens has
ever been mounted and the body cap is in place. I don't know who to ask other
than the good Pentaxians Thanks,
On 2/14/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that the K10D is quieter than the D. I can tell by how many
times I get caught shooting pics in coffee shops:-). But when I want to
be really hushed, I pull out my Leica iiif RD. It's even quiet for a
Leica, as it was apparently lubed
Do you think the ciaper-wearing astronatut killed Anna Nichol Smith? They were
both in Florida. Inquiring minds want to know.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 06:58:27PM +, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Adam Maas wrote:
Pentax DSLR's with M42 lenses (which
offer metering only via the green button hack or DoF preview
Is that true with M42s? I thought that it meters fully in Av mode
Show me exactly where I stated 'M42 adaptors do auto-aperture'. I
didn't. As far as I'm concerned, the metering stop down button IS the
auto aperture feature. They're directly (and physically) connected on
M42 SLR's that feature that capability. That's exactly what I was
referring to when I
1 - 100 of 304 matches
Mail list logo
