Most likely a small mirror at 45 deg. The lens is behind the mirror
and zooming is invisible inside the camerabody. Minolta was first.
On 8/24/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 05:55:03PM -0600, Tom C wrote:
Bingo!!
You said what I was trying to say much more concisely and
precisely...
cheers,
frank
I decided the best way to settle this question once and for all was to
ask someone who really knows. This is what he says:
If your art expresses yourself, it's art. Real art. Period. Ken
Tom C wrote:
Native ISO of 200 is a little disappointing. Would have preferred 100 or
50.
Isn't the ISO rating (of the sensor) directly linked to the
signal-to-noise ratio? Isn't wanting a lower ISO like wishing the sensor
was noisier?
- T
Tom C.
From: Amita Guha [EMAIL
Lots to like here. Very cute girl. You nailed the focus. The
biggest nit for me is the dark spot above her head in the background -
makes it look kind of like an extension of her head.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 5:23:34 AM, you wrote:
R Another shot of my daughter
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:52:33 +0200, Patrick Genovese wrote
Hello Pentax
Please add this feature in the next firmware upgrade:
Add a feature to multiply the focal length reported by the lens by a
user entered factor e.g 1.4x 2x 1.7x and operate the SR system based
on that.. Easy software
On Aug 24, 2007, at 2:32 AM, Christian wrote:
I have no garage but the bike bug has definitely hit.
I hear that loud clear. I'm test-riding a nice XC bike tomorrow
morning. Not with any intention to buy, of course well not yet...
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I have a SP here if your interested
I'll be at a 3 day horse show, so if i dont answer any questions right
away, thats why
Dave
On 8/24/07, Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi William,
In what condition is the MX body? If it is particularly nice, I may
be interested. Actually, I
Taken on one of two day trips to Wales, the weather finally broke here in the
UK and we got a little sun 8)
Sigma 10-20 @ 10mm:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6341179
Full size (uncropped):
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6341179size=lg
John
None worth mentioning.
On 8/24/07, Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for the prompt reply. If the viewfinder is now clear, I
may be interested. How does the camera look overall...any notable
dings or scratches?
Thanks,
Glen
On Aug 24, 2007, at 12:01 AM, Amita Guha
If the camera's about as old as I am, it's getting up there. ;)
Amita
On 8/23/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amita Guha wrote:
Here are my ebay auctions for the week.
K1000 + lens:
Would you kindly refrain from referring to the K1000 as an old
camera. Show some respect.
...taken from the harbour at Shell Island, Sigma 10-20 @ 18mm:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6341358
Large version:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6341358size=lg
John
From:
Mark Roberts
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 23, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I just play a grouchy old fart for the PDML. In person, I'm just
sweetness and light... ]'-)
Let me introduce myself: My name is Brad Dobo...
;-)
Who is/was Brad Dobo? I don't
Hi all
Last week I spent an hour or so walking around the inner Sydney suburb of
Glebe. This mail box attracted my attention both for the fairly original
message and the colourful background wall.
http://www.blognow.com.au/PESO/70522/No_Spam.html
Comments, criticisms, advice always welcome.
Yeah Amita. Old is so rude.
Relic would be more respectful.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/24/07, Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the camera's about as old as I am, it's getting up there. ;)
Amita
On 8/23/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amita Guha wrote:
Here are my ebay
On 8/24/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided the best way to settle this question once and for all was to
ask someone who really knows. This is what he says:
If your art expresses yourself, it's art. Real art. Period. Ken
Rockwell.
Not much room for doubt there, and such good
On 24/08/07, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't the ISO rating (of the sensor) directly linked to the
signal-to-noise ratio?
Indirectly.
Isn't wanting a lower ISO like wishing the sensor
was noisier?
No, the sensors effective native ISO has more to do with its
saturation level, the
Rebekah wrote: By the way, if everyone is grouchy
old farts, I'm the young amateur comic relief around here.
Sorry, but Rule 17a, subsection c of the Official Unwritten PDML
handbook clearly states that in order to qualify for Comic Relief
status, you have to be funny.
--
PDML
Ugh!
I love the colour. The shadows on the left are a bit of a distraction
but eh!!! it's still a fun shot.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/24/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Har!
I love the colour. The shadows on the left are a bit of a distraction
but eh!!! But it's still a fun shot.
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 24/08/07, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't the ISO rating (of the sensor) directly linked to the
signal-to-noise ratio?
Indirectly.
Isn't wanting a lower ISO like wishing the sensor
was noisier?
No, the sensors effective
The thread started by Jostein a few days ago made me realise that I just
have to buy a ring flash. I'm looking at the cheap options, though,
specifically I very nearly ordered a Vivitar 6000 yesterday, but then I
thought I should perhaps try to find out more about it first.
Unfortunately, not
Har!
I love the colour. The shadows on the left are a bit of a distraction
but eh!!! But it's still a fun shot.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/24/07, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Last week I spent an hour or so walking around the inner Sydney suburb of
Glebe. This mail box attracted
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Pentax_645_Digital_no_longer_priority_news_139145.html
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax
Toralf Lund wrote:
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 24/08/07, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't the ISO rating (of the sensor) directly linked to the
signal-to-noise ratio? [ ... ]
what I was trying to say, is that I think I've
read somewhere that
P-TTL ringflashes for Pentax don't exist (I have never found one). The
TTL models won't work on K10D etc.
The ringflash I use is a no name version like this
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=160146845797
They vary in branding, logos etc and sometimes as cheap as $50. These
Thanks, Rebekah.
I probably should have taken a bit more time over it but I get nervous taking
photos of people's houses. I keep expecting to get mugged by a disgruntled
homeowner (or at the very least his/her dog).
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western
Kenny dixit.
Ars longa, vita brevis.
On 8/24/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided the best way to settle this question once and for all was to
ask someone who really knows. This is what he says:
If your art expresses
I'm sure it's actually no longer a priority for Hoya. That camera
division had better start making money. Let's hope the Wal-mart deal
works.
Steve
Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/24/2007 9:05 AM
Unfortunately, I'm at my funniest when I'm not even trying . . .
On 8/21/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/08/07, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed:
I did lick through and look
at them, however, and they are very well done indeed.
Dan, that's the best Freudian slip
Some grotesque and highly doctored photographs, but interesting and
effective nonetheless:
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/index.php?storyID=8347
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
WOW, just WOW.
On 8/21/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beautiful ! And the picture isn't bad either VBG
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - The Bride
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: PESO - The Bride
Ugh!!??
Are you referring to the photo or your mangled prose? :-)
I quite like the dark left hand side for the contrast it provides with the
colourful wall. I suppose I could have taken the shot less front on to reduce
the shadowing - maybe on my next trip there.
Cheers
Brian
frank theriault wrote:
[Ken Rockwell's] writing is on par with his photography.
So, are you insulting his writing or his photography. ;-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/24/07, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rebekah wrote: By the way, if everyone is grouchy
old farts, I'm the young amateur comic relief around here.
Sorry, but Rule 17a, subsection c of the Official Unwritten PDML
handbook clearly states that in order to qualify for Comic Relief
On 8/24/07, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
[Ken Rockwell's] writing is on par with his photography.
So, are you insulting his writing or his photography. ;-)
He's an insult to all writing photography :-)
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 24/08/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't this like the third time that this has been reported...
Wasting bandwidth or your time am I?
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
On 24/08/07, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, Wikipedia says:
ISO Standard 12232:2006
http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=3
(Photography — Digital still cameras — Determination of exposure
index, ISO speed ratings,
On 8/24/07, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ugh!!??
Are you referring to the photo or your mangled prose? :-)
My mangled prose. It's been a long day and my brain is mushier than usual :-)
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Isn't this like the third time that this has been reported...
Digital Image Studio wrote:
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Pentax_645_Digital_no_longer_priority_news_139145.html
--
Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Howdy listers,
Been a bit quiet lately, despite Norm's usual baiting.
On holiday an hour inland from La Rochelle in the Poitou-Cherente (about
half way down France on the left hand side). The blasted weather has
been abysmal, with only three decent days this week - and one of those
is supposed
On 22/08/07, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
I am not old!
Scot's right. He just looks old.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Toralf Lund wrote:
The thread started by Jostein a few days ago made me realise that I just
have to buy a ring flash. I'm looking at the cheap options, though,
specifically I very nearly ordered a Vivitar 6000 yesterday, but then I
thought I should perhaps try to find out more about it
Doug Brewer wrote:
Rebekah wrote: By the way, if everyone is grouchy
old farts, I'm the young amateur comic relief around here.
Sorry, but Rule 17a, subsection c of the Official Unwritten PDML
handbook clearly states that in order to qualify for Comic Relief
status, you have to
I resemble that comment!
Norm
Cotty wrote:
Howdy listers,
Been a bit quiet lately, despite Norm's usual baiting.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Scott Loveless wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
Rebekah wrote: By the way, if everyone is grouchy
old farts, I'm the young amateur comic relief around here.
Sorry, but Rule 17a, subsection c of the Official Unwritten PDML
handbook clearly states that in order to qualify for Comic Relief
Rebekah wrote: By the way, if everyone is grouchy
old farts, I'm the young amateur comic relief around here.
Sorry, but Rule 17a, subsection c of the Official Unwritten PDML
handbook clearly states that in order to qualify for Comic Relief
status, you have to be funny.
Sorry Doug, you forgot
Fernando wrote:
Kenny dixit.
Ars longa, vita brevis.
Droopy ass, short life?
keith
--
On 8/24/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/24/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided the best way to settle this question once and for all was to
ask someone who really knows.
Thanks for everyone's compliments on this photo, and especially thank
you for all the advice. I will do my best to keep and eye out for
backgrounds in the future, even when shooting those darn roddlers!
rg2
On 8/24/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lots to like here. Very cute girl.
frank theriault wrote:
On 8/24/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided the best way to settle this question once and for all was to
ask someone who really knows. This is what he says:
If your art expresses yourself, it's art. Real art. Period. Ken
Rockwell.
Not much room for doubt
Hi all -
I'm selling off a some underutilized accessories to finance some
extension tubes. Here's what I have:
Pentax cable switch 105 (MZ-S and 645nII), used but perfect condition
with box, $30
Pentax F5P(L) flash extension cord, new never used in box, $30
Pentax 5.5x magnifying loupe with
Yesterday, I drove by the site of the Charleston Sofa Super Store
fire, which you can read up on here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charleston_Sofa_Super_Store_fire
My husband and I lost two friends in that fire, and it was a shock to
see it still standing. I never drove over there because I
Actually, there's a small ding on the top of the pentaprism which is
visible in one of the photos.
On 8/24/07, Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None worth mentioning.
On 8/24/07, Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for the prompt reply. If the viewfinder is now clear, I
Peter
What sort of extension tubes are you looking for? I have some for a
screw mount, I think.
rg2
On 8/24/07, Peter.J.Popp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all -
I'm selling off a some underutilized accessories to finance some
extension tubes. Here's what I have:
Pentax cable switch 105
Rebekah wrote:
R
I have no need for funny, I'm just darn gorgeous. :oP
rg2
Pics or it ain't true.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The lawyers and those paranoid about legalistic matters may disagree,
but I see no reason to ask anyone's permission to take any photo in a
public place.
stan
On Aug 24, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Rebekah wrote:
Yesterday, I drove by the site of the Charleston Sofa Super Store
fire, which you can
Pentax AF 1.7x, caps, ex. cond. $400
Caltar HR 300/5.6 in Copal 3, with Nikon Y2 95mm filter, caps., ex.
cond. (8x10) $350
+ shipping.
PayPal referred.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://www.brendemuehl.net
http://yourevangelicalperspective.blogspot.com
I like it, what a great angle that you chose to shoot from, and you
got some good shadows on the castle, which really bring out the
character of the place.
rg2
On 8/24/07, John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken on one of two day trips to Wales, the weather finally broke here in the
On 8/25/07, Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax AF 1.7x, caps, ex. cond. $400
This is an extremely good piece of kit.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
sure, because I routinely photograph myself.
I'm pretty at best, I'll dig around - you've seen at least one pic of
me before anyways. Don't you know empty gloating when you see it? :oP
rg2
On 8/24/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rebekah wrote:
R
I have no need for funny,
Would someone from across the pond mind explaining farmyard scrumpy in
general and cripple cock (shut up, Norm) specifically? I understand
that it's cider, but that's about all I've been able figure out.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
It's still a free country, last time I looked.
Tom C.
From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: A Gray Matter
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:50:21 -0500
The lawyers and those paranoid about legalistic
On Aug 24, 2007, at 4:33 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
I just play a grouchy old fart for the PDML. In person, I'm
just
sweetness and light... ]'-)
Let me introduce myself: My name is Brad Dobo...
;-)
Who is/was Brad Dobo? I don't understand the reference.
Norm Baugher's alter ego. Be
Tom C wrote:
It's still a free country, last time I looked.
Tom C.
What are you smoking?
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/24/07, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sure, because I routinely photograph myself...
I do.
Well not routinely. Just when I'm waiting for someone, bored , have a
camera on hand there is nothing better around (trust me I
looked...hard!):
Rebekah -
I'm looking for Pentax bayonet mount, for my FA 135/2.8. Haven't
really explored my options yet. I need to do some testing with a
toilet paper roll to see what lengths I need.
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi,
Would any kind soul who has access to a 50-500 check out one thing for me?
What is effective the max apterure at 400mm (or at least what does the
camera report the aperture to be. I realise that this will probably
be rounded the the nearest 1/2 or 1/3 F stop.
Rgds
Patrick
On 8/24/07,
The Pro version didn't even make it to the mock-up stage.
Cheers,
Norm.
On 8/25/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That article is just plain abusive, referring to the mockup as a dummy
version.
Tom C.
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Hi Norm.
Tom C.
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well not routinely. Just when I'm waiting for someone, bored , have a
camera on hand there is nothing better around (trust me I
looked...hard!):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/IMGP4150.jpg
This is all moot anyway. I'm neither
Not from an article dated August 24, 2007 and not from the mouth of Hiroshi
Onoda, European general manager for Imaging Systems (whoever he is).
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject:
Relatively speaking...
Tom C.
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: A Gray Matter
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:20:00 -0400
Tom C wrote:
It's still a free country, last time I looked.
- Original Message -
From: John Whittingham
Subject: A view of Wales.
...taken from the harbour at Shell Island, Sigma 10-20 @ 18mm:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6341358
I knew Wales was small, but to get all of it in a single photograph is
- Original Message -
From: Rebekah
Subject: A Gray Matter
Yesterday, I drove by the site of the Charleston Sofa Super Store
fire, which you can read up on here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charleston_Sofa_Super_Store_fire
My husband and I lost two friends in that fire, and it
I'm laughing so hard I am incapable of saying anything. (Laughing with
you of course...)
Norm
Scott Loveless wrote:
Would someone from across the pond mind explaining farmyard scrumpy in
general and cripple cock (shut up, Norm) specifically? I understand
that it's cider, but that's about
That article is just plain abusive, referring to the mockup as a dummy
version.
Tom C.
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: News: Pentax: 645 Digital 'no longer priority'
Date: Sat,
Stan Halpin wrote:
The lawyers and those paranoid about legalistic matters may disagree,
but I see no reason to ask anyone's permission to take any photo in a
public place.
stan
I'll second that. On the tow path we found a family leading their small
children across a log over a
Legally? As long as you are on public property when you shoot, and it is not
something Homeland Security restricts you are OK.
The owners of the property, their lawyers, and their agents can restrict your
actions on their property.
Morally? That is between you and God, or your Church, or your
Hi Tom.
Tom C wrote:
Hi Norm.
Tom C.
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well not routinely. Just when I'm waiting for someone, bored , have a
camera on hand there is nothing better around (trust me I
looked...hard!):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/IMGP4150.jpg
This
Hi All,
If I were to remove a JMDC inspection sticker from an older camera
body (late 70s or early 80s vintage), would an oval spot show up in
place of the sticker (i.e. from fading)? Overall, the camera is in
nice condition. Have any of you ever tried this with an older camera?
Thanks,
I saw the small ding. Thank you for pointing out this relatively
minor flaw. I appreciate your honesty.
Now I must decide between the Super Program and a few others. I am
eyeing an ME Super, a Spotmatic F, and an MX. The only hitch (for
me, at least) with the ME Super is the lack of DOF
I might be mistaken, but I think in many cases that 'accesses' to private
property are also considered valid for certain public use unless they are
posted as No Trespassing and even then maybe there's a disconnect between
the law and the way things really work (and of course the laws are
Wait a minute, we'll be the judges of that, post a self portrait.
Rebekah wrote:
Rebekah wrote: By the way, if everyone is grouchy
old farts, I'm the young amateur comic relief around here.
Sorry, but Rule 17a, subsection c of the Official Unwritten PDML
handbook clearly states
Hey, Franks multi talented, he can do both.
Doug Franklin wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
[Ken Rockwell's] writing is on par with his photography.
So, are you insulting his writing or his photography. ;-)
--
Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
No, but AP certainly is. Of course that could be true even if it weren't
reporting this...
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 24/08/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't this like the third time that this has been reported...
Wasting bandwidth or your time am I?
--
- Original Message -
From: Glen Tortorella
Subject: JMDC Sticker
Hi All,
If I were to remove a JMDC inspection sticker from an older camera
body (late 70s or early 80s vintage), would an oval spot show up in
place of the sticker (i.e. from fading)? Overall, the camera is in
nice
- Original Message -
From: Tom Cakalic
Subject: Re: A Gray Matter
I might be mistaken, but I think in many cases that 'accesses' to private
property are also considered valid for certain public use unless they are
posted as No Trespassing and even then maybe there's a disconnect
Those stickers have tracers in them. The government will know if the tag is
removed and then strange things will start happening to you.
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: JMDC
Good one, William...like those white tags on couches--do not remove
under penalty of law :-)
Glen
On Aug 24, 2007, at 1:30 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Glen Tortorella
Subject: JMDC Sticker
Hi All,
If I were to remove a JMDC inspection sticker from an
Only if it needs to be cleaned...
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Hi All,
If I were to remove a JMDC inspection sticker from an older camera
body (late 70s or early 80s vintage), would an oval spot show up in
place of the sticker (i.e. from fading)? Overall, the camera is in
nice condition.
Delivery people and the like (the paper boy, mailman, whatever), are
generally considered to be invitees, and are automatically granted limited
access to your property to conduct their business. The same with meter
readers, who are granted access to your yard to do what they need to do.
This does
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tom Cakalic
Subject: Re: A Gray Matter
I might be mistaken, but I think in many cases that 'accesses' to private
property are also considered valid for certain public use unless they are
posted as No Trespassing and even then
My God may, get those catapillers away from your eyes!
(Maybe you're good and funny looking...)
David Savage wrote:
On 8/24/07, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sure, because I routinely photograph myself...
I do.
Well not routinely. Just when I'm waiting for someone, bored ,
The sidewalk along the perimeter of a property is usually part of the
public right of way...
Scott Loveless wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tom Cakalic
Subject: Re: A Gray Matter
I might be mistaken, but I think in many cases that 'accesses' to
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 24/08/07, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, Wikipedia says:
ISO Standard 12232:2006
http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=3
(Photography — Digital still cameras — Determination of exposure
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 23, 2007, at 12:33 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
I'm grouchy, and stubbornly opinionated, but still young.
And of course, long live film, especially Kodachrome.
When/if you get a scanner and figure out how to scan Kodachrome, would
please, please let me
It's started already. The invasion has begun.
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: JMDC Sticker
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:16:45 -0400
Yes, you'll start to get e-mails from Tom C...
Bill, myself, and you actually see things pretty much the same way. While a
house and the land it is on is private property, the public at large has
certain limited 'rights' of access up to the entrance. It's common sense.
As you wrote, the right to speak or initiate conversation with the
Yes, you'll start to get e-mails from Tom C...
Tom C wrote:
Those stickers have tracers in them. The government will know if the tag is
removed and then strange things will start happening to you.
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Another good one...though in the age of Homeland Security (aka Big
Brother) and warrantless wiretaps, there is little that would
surprise me.
Glen
On Aug 24, 2007, at 2:13 PM, Tom C wrote:
Those stickers have tracers in them. The government will know if
the tag is
removed and then
Apparently it's almost impossible to a get a mug shot of me unless I pose.
All I can see is my nose in these pictures. Oh well. I still
maintain that I have no need to be funny just so I can be the comic
relief around here.
Stan Halpin wrote:
The lawyers and those paranoid about legalistic matters may disagree,
but I see no reason to ask anyone's permission to take any photo in a
public place.
stan
I'll second that. On the tow path we found a family leading their
small
children across a log over a
oh man, that's like pulling the tag off your mattress. A friend of
mine did that and I never saw him again
Seriously, unless you leave your camera baking in the sun I doubt it's
faded much. If it looks horrific after removal, there's always
superglue.
Why do you want to take it off?
rg2
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
