I'd vouch for it too. I used it extensively while touring Egypt, and have no
complaints. BTW, the kit I took only
included it and the 50-200, and I probably shot over 70% with the 16-45. Those
monuments are damned big!
Both lens performed extremely well, as did the *istD.
Still working
Ouch, I understand the frustration...
In this case, the very problem is that Samsung... has most probably no
technical repair centre. Will they even use another distributor? I
dunno. This is Samsung Techwin, not the Samsung of Electronics. It is
the same group but they might choose different
I wonder how about newcomer DA 35mm Macro Limited pancake?
--
K100D Super, DA10-17mm, DA*16-50mm, DA50-200mm, Dörr DStudio strobes
roman.blakout.net http://roman.blakout.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
I have one which I like very much. I am considering selling it for a
Tamron 17-50/2.8 but did not decide yet whay I will do.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out
Ah, got ya.
I took a few from different angles, but yes some closer shots might
work. I'll head back there, its not far.
Dave
On Feb 7, 2008 9:00 PM, Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry I wasn't clearer, I meant you should work the scene more as in take
more images, different
2008/2/7, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm reminded of certain Norwegians selling black metal merchandise
myself, but perhaps I shouldn't reveal their big secrets like this.
Aaahhh!!!
Sputnik, right?
That's one of the best BBS scams ever.
Not entirely sure if _any_ non-Norwegians would catch
On Feb 8, 2008 8:15 PM, Peter Fairweather [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikon D3 What a marketing con. ISO 25000 looks unusable. Obviously
dreamt up by the same marketing team who gave us burst mode in the
K20D.
It depends how the RAW files are processed.
From what I've heard ACR is crap. However
On 08.02.2008, at 11:32 , Thibouille wrote:
Interesting, for sure. We cannot know the exact test conditions and
blabla so weshould take this with a grain of salt but I have to admit
I like those results :)
Cameras compared: K20D, A700, 40D, D300, D3.
Initial post containing the links to
35mm is short... I do not expect it to cover film plane correctly but
that'd be a very very nice bonus if it did :)
A comparison with the DFA50 would be also very interesting.
On Feb 8, 2008 10:20 AM, Roman Melihhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder how about newcomer DA 35mm Macro Limited
I like it as well. Print it. Noise, grain, they're a part of low
light photography. At this low res, the noise isn't very noticeable,
do I suspect it will be quite tolerable in at 8 x 12 or even a bit
larger.
Paul
On Feb 7, 2008, at 11:35 PM, John Celio wrote:
Interesting, for sure. We cannot know the exact test conditions and
blabla so weshould take this with a grain of salt but I have to admit
I like those results :)
Cameras compared: K20D, A700, 40D, D300, D3.
Initial post containing the links to the articles for each camera:
So are FA-J digital lenses ?
On Feb 7, 2008 6:04 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The DA 40mm is said to be the same optical formula as the M 40mm which
is soft in the corners on 35mm. It is however eminently pocketable.
There were few Pentax 35mm cameras that could set the aperture
P. J. Alling wrote:
The DA 40mm is said to be the same optical formula as the M 40mm which
is soft in the corners on 35mm. It is however eminently pocketable.
There were few Pentax 35mm cameras that could set the aperture from the
body so I still say the 70mm not a FF lens.
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/02/08 Fri AM 05:32:09 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - for our British friends (long)
On Feb 8, 2008, at 5:54 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just
I have it too.
It is very decent quality for its price. My most used lens for over
two years now.
Jostein
2008/2/8, Steve Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does anyone own one of these? I was playing with one today at the
local camera store and am toying with buying one. Are they any good?
--
Steve
David Mann wrote:
Someone should turn queueing into an extreme sport.
Haven't the football hooligans already done that? :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008 1:08 PM, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to know if the 70mm Limited will cover (with good results)
the 35mm frame, and for that I need your help.
I've saw some time ago a test but I
On Feb 8, 2008 1:57 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the only AF film cameras I currently own are an MZ-3 and ZX-5n and
neither can control aperture from the body, and I have much better zooms
in those ranges, I consider them to be at best inconvenient body caps.
Yeah I
Jaded person! ;-)
Jack
--- Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
K20D almost looks contrived. Larger thumbnail to, maybe, include
more
dazzling red lips..hummm
I hope it's an honest comparison to the extent possible.
not a chance. Just another person justifying a
On Feb 8, 2008 4:10 AM, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, the ability to set aperture from the body, or lack thereof,
didn't really change with the introduction of digital, did it?
Most AF film bodies could could control the aperture directly from the
body, but didn't have
Read your little explanation and got a good chuckle as the picture
showed. Nice work, as usual!
--
Bruce
Thursday, February 7, 2008, 7:31:20 AM, you wrote:
ft Hi, neighbour! It looks like you're new here. If we can do anything
ft to help you settle in, don't hesitate to ask. Cup of sugar,
Nicely seen and captured. I like it.
--
Bruce
Thursday, February 7, 2008, 10:39:12 AM, you wrote:
KW Check out -
KW http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
KW K10D, 28-8-mm SMC F
KW Comments appreciated.
KW Kenneth Waller
KW http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
--
PDML
On Feb 7, 2008, at 18:00, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Found this morning:
Best prank ever: Stopping time at Grand Central Station - Gadling
http://www.gadling.com/2008/02/01/best-prank-ever-stopping-time-at-
grand-central-station/
Don't forget to read the whole story at
My sentiments as well.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, February 7, 2008, 12:11:15 PM, you wrote:
DJB Wonderful shot. A very nice tribute.
DJB Welcome back.
DJB Dave
DJB On Feb 7, 2008 3:09 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the wall of stones, rest and peace for these
On Feb 7, 2008, at 8:00, frank theriault wrote:
We just got whacked with fresh snow over the past two days. Although
I took this about a month ago after a snowfall of similar depth to
yesterday's, I thought it to be a most effective ad:
http://tinyurl.com/yoj6h8
On Feb 7, 2008, at 16:41, Christine Aguila wrote:
Frank: Another great one! I think Doug suggested to keep the color
sign
and make everything BW. I think that suggestion has some interesting
possibilities. Enjoyed seeing this. Cheers, Christine
I disagree. I think it's best for the
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article1343516.ece
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
I must say, you have this dog portrait work down pat. Excellent as
usual, as well as a beautiful animal.
--
Bruce
Thursday, February 7, 2008, 7:53:17 AM, you wrote:
wb Yet Another Dog Pic
wb http://www.pbase.com/image/92645899
wb Ivan aged 9 months
wb K10D, 16-45mm
wb Wendy
--
Peter Fairweather wrote:
C*n** 40D. Rubbish, does not resolve the detail on the flower on the
shoulder even at low ISO.
It was out of focus to begin with. if you look at the original full
sized shot you can see that focus is on the near side of the doll's face
and hair.
what's rubbish is
Thiboiulle
Thanks for this. I've put on my special VDU focal length glasses and
blown up the images a bit on my 24 monitor. So that they just fit on
the screen. Here are my completely unscientific conclusions.
C*n** 40D. Rubbish, does not resolve the detail on the flower on the
shoulder even at
Nice! Made me smile. Well seen and captured.
--
Bruce
Thursday, February 7, 2008, 6:00:17 AM, you wrote:
ft We just got whacked with fresh snow over the past two days. Although
ft I took this about a month ago after a snowfall of similar depth to
ft yesterday's, I thought it to be a most
Jack Davis wrote:
K20D almost looks contrived. Larger thumbnail to, maybe, include more
dazzling red lips..hummm
I hope it's an honest comparison to the extent possible.
not a chance. Just another person justifying a purchase. I don't
compare... I shoot!
--
Christian
Peter Fairweather wrote:
Christian
The Canon appears to be with the 17-85 lens at f/8. I can't find
anywhere particularly sharp. Poor control as you suggest. Also colour
fringing between black and white lines in the photo, could also be
lens related
The exif I saw for the ISO 100 image
K20D almost looks contrived. Larger thumbnail to, maybe, include more
dazzling red lips..hummm
I hope it's an honest comparison to the extent possible.
Jack
--- Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting, for sure. We cannot know the exact test conditions and
blabla so weshould take this
Hello Thomas,
I'm glad that my shot was able to convey the mood for you. Thanks for
commenting.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, February 7, 2008, 5:44:05 PM, you wrote:
TW Not many comments on this months images.
TW My favorites were:
TW Dear Santa by Francis and Polar express by Bruce
I upgraded from an *istD to the K10D. The only painful things about it are
those occasions when I need two cameras, and I have to use the D again. Now
that hurts. The K10D is so much nicer to work with that I never looked back.
Paul
-- Original message --
From:
Tim Bray wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 10:07 AM, Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I really don't know. I'd manage to get a K10D for a reasonable sum but
the K20D is a big leap in spec from my *ist D and it offers me the bizarre
situation of owning something current. Anyone else updating
Hello Tim,
I like the first one.
--
Bruce
Thursday, February 7, 2008, 11:27:29 AM, you wrote:
TB With an adorable Highland calf, even:
TB http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2008/02/06/-big/IMGP7657.jpg
TB Want more cute cows?
TB
Scott Loveless wrote:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article1343516.ece
Big surprise. Not.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
FWIW, the Canon 17-85 performed very poorly in the current dpreview
lens tests.
Jack
--- Peter Fairweather [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christian
The Canon appears to be with the 17-85 lens at f/8. I can't find
anywhere particularly sharp. Poor control as you suggest. Also colour
fringing
Actually my plan is to sell my Ds keep the D as a backup, (I think I can
get more the Ds since it's more current, and not as beat up), and get a
K20D, unless I can find a K10D at an extremely good price.
Malcolm Smith wrote:
Our family has had a dreadful 2008 so far and I've yet to take any
We thought Kodak was being run by idiots. Now here's proof. Kodak
would be better off running it into the ground than selling as long as
there's profit to be made, even if they are correct in their
estimates. Properly done film sales it could remain a profit center
for a very long time
William Robb wrote:
From: Scott Loveless
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article1343516.ece
The last line is a hoot.
Do you think Ansell Adams would have used digital?
I believe in the last revamp of The Negative that Ansel edited before he
P. J. Alling wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll bet their financial people did some projections and found that the
profits
would be marginal because the operation is probably way too large and
cumbersone
to service a relatively small market. I would guess
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Kodak to sell off film production?
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article1343516.ece
The last line is a hoot.
Do you think Ansell Adams would have used digital?
I believe in the last
Or they just haven't annunced it yet. I think that film will always be
available, but it will come from small operations.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fuji doesn't seem to be planning to leave the film market. Maybe they
From the article, ... the business would only command 0.5 times annual
sales... If there are any takers at that price. The brand is what
they'd have to be selling. If they're not selling the brand along with
the plant who'd buy it? Those who think Kodak will be able to devote
more
AlunFoto wrote:
2008/2/7, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm reminded of certain Norwegians selling black metal merchandise
myself, but perhaps I shouldn't reveal their big secrets like this.
Aaahhh!!!
Sputnik, right?
That's one of the best BBS scams ever.
Definitely ;-)
Not
Scott Loveless wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep. Anyone who has studied Ansel's darkroom methodology has to
realize that he would have loved PhotoShop. Do I hear fifty layer
files? Paul
No doubt about it. I do wonder if he would have questioned the
archivability of ink jet prints.
William Robb wrote:
I updated from an istD to a K10. It was quite a jump. There
are still things
I prefer about the istD, but the image quality and responsiveness
improvements in the K10 are very nice. While I am not saing I
am giving the
K20 a pass, I am much less motivated to by into
I'm still using my *ist D Pentax. I recently purchased the Pentax 18-250
zoom (re-badged Tamron), and now I am considering getting the K100 Super
which has the same 6.1 megapixels.
Jim A.
On Feb 8, 2008 10:07 AM, Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Now I really don't know. I'd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep. Anyone who has studied Ansel's darkroom methodology has to
realize that he would have loved PhotoShop. Do I hear fifty layer
files? Paul
No doubt about it. I do wonder if he would have questioned the
archivability of ink jet prints. Perhaps he may have used a
Yep. Anyone who has studied Ansel's darkroom methodology has
to realize that he would have loved PhotoShop. Do I hear
fifty layer files?
Paul
He could have cut pasted some people into his pictures.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Tim Bray wrote:
I'm planning to. I'm a little worried, the old *ist has made
me very happy since I bought it in May 2004 (my write-up at the time:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/05/16/PentaxDSLR).
I've grown so accustomed to the old Pentax that I'm sure
the transition will
On Feb 8, 2008 12:41 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have anything against artificial desaturation, if it's
appropriate and done well, but I agree that in this case, its occurrence
*naturally* is one of the things that makes this photo cool.
I've been trying to formulate a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll bet their financial people did some projections and found that the
profits
would be marginal because the operation is probably way too large and
cumbersone
to service a relatively small market. I would guess that they also concluded
that
the business is worth
Our family has had a dreadful 2008 so far and I've yet to take any pictures
other than for eBay adverts, I just haven't been in the mood for it.
I've been wondering about giving myself a little enablement by buying a K10D
on the premise that there might be a few good offers on the last K10Ds - or
I suspect that the best inkjet papers and pigment inks will last longer than
wet prints. But we won't know for a hundred years or so, will we?
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep. Anyone who has
Mark Roberts wrote:
Fuji doesn't seem to be planning to leave the film market.
Not that they're saying pubically, anyway ;-)
Tee hee
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I stumbled across one of my pics on the web. I don't recall anyone asking if
they could use it, although they may have. There are a lot of things I don't
remember these days:-). I don't mind in the least, but I do wonder what type of
pub this is and what the language might be. It's here:
On Feb 8, 2008 10:07 AM, Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I really don't know. I'd manage to get a K10D for a reasonable sum but
the K20D is a big leap in spec from my *ist D and it offers me the bizarre
situation of owning something current. Anyone else updating from an *ist D?
I'm
On 2/8/08, Peter Fairweather [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christian
The Canon appears to be with the 17-85 lens at f/8. I can't find
anywhere particularly sharp. Poor control as you suggest. Also colour
fringing between black and white lines in the photo, could also be
lens related
Adam
Be
I'm afraid that with digital tools, reality is purely in the mind of
the creator. Take a look up on photo.net and see how different
reality has become - funny thing is I don't think the world has
really changed that much.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, February 8, 2008, 10:16:57 AM, you
Fuji doesn't seem to be planning to leave the film market. Maybe they
planned better...
Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll bet their financial people did some projections and found that the
profits
would be marginal because the operation is probably way too large
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT:Does anyone recognize this language?
I stumbled across one of my pics on the web. I don't recall anyone asking
if they could use it, although they may have. There are a lot of things I
don't remember these days:-). I don't
No - Ansul makes fire extinguishers.
-p
Derby Chang wrote:
The clueless director of photography should be fired. Ansell makes
condoms.
D
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Does anyone know anything about this Play Comet site? They must have pulled
some of my pics off Photo.net. Should I care? It looks a bit sleazy.
http://pic.playcomet.com/search.aspx?q=Paul%20Stenquist
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Yep. Anyone who has studied Ansel's darkroom methodology has to realize that he
would have loved PhotoShop. Do I hear fifty layer files?
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
William Robb wrote:
From: Scott Loveless
I registered a complaint. It will be interesting to see if they comply. The
message I sent them appears below.
My copyrighted photography is displayed on your site without my approval or
permission. The thumbnail page is here:
http://pic.playcomet.com/search.aspx?q=Paul%20Stenquist
All of my
Sex ads come up on every page that I looked at. They have some very good
photography posted. All without permission, I suspect.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I find the adverts quite intriguing, I wonder what it is about the
You bet it does!! ;}
-p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being old sucks!:-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The URL looks Hungarian...
-p
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
They've obviously been raiding photo.net. I checked a name or two that appear
on the most popular photo.net pages, and some of their photos are up there as
well. I'm going to alert them and register a complaint.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: William Robb
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT:: Sheesh! What's this?
Does anyone know anything about this Play Comet site? They must have
pulled some of my pics off Photo.net. Should I care? It looks a bit
sleazy.
On Feb 8, 2008 4:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know anything about this Play Comet site? They must have pulled
some of my pics off Photo.net. Should I care? It looks a bit sleazy.
http://pic.playcomet.com/search.aspx?q=Paul%20Stenquist
I'd care. It's a pretty clear breach of
The URL looks Hungarian...
-p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I stumbled across one of my pics on the web. I don't recall anyone asking if
they could use it, although they may have. There are a lot of things I don't
remember these days:-). I don't mind in the least, but I do wonder what type
of
AlunFoto wrote:
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2008/02/on-windy-day.html
Should I crop this one a bit? Suggestions appreciated.
thanks,
Jostein
I like the near-square format and the aerial perspective - very classy.
And the crooked road marker conveys the bleak wind well.
D
--
[EMAIL
I find the adverts quite intriguing, I wonder what it is about the Text
Paul Stenquest that causes ads by Google to bring those up.
Then again it could be the Hot Top 10 list...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know anything about this Play Comet site? They must have pulled
some of my
On Feb 8, 2008, at 15:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I stumbled across one of my pics on the web. I don't recall anyone
asking if they could use it, although they may have. There are a lot
of things I don't remember these days:-). I don't mind in the least,
but I do wonder what type of
frank theriault wrote:
At one point in the fairly recent past I said I'd always use film, at
least on some level. I said that when I went digital I wouldn't stop
using film, that I'd continue to use my film cameras for serious
shooting as long as they continued to be functional.
I got my
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Kodak to sell off film production?
That's true. So, I guess we might never know, but I do expect the new
pigment inks to last a very long time.
I expect that the newer pigment sets such as the Epson K3 will have a better
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: Kodak to sell off film production?
I love film, still think it looks better (nothing beats TriX!) but I
can't see using it again.
Didn't take long for me to make the full conversion. At least Kodak
waited for me to go
The domain name is .hu. Hungarian?
Timber will know, I guess.
2008/2/8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I stumbled across one of my pics on the web. I don't recall anyone asking if
they could use it, although they may have. There are a lot of things I don't
remember these days:-). I
On Feb 8, 2008 11:45 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article1343516.ece
Big surprise. Not.
At one point in the fairly recent past I said I'd always use film, at
least on some level. I
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: As requested by Mark Roberts, my pdml shirt photo
He hasn't tried to sleep within 20 feet of him, either.
I recall trying to sleep within 60 feet of him one year...
After the first night, I discovered that if I drank myself
I agree with Charles. It's intriguing as found.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 7, 2008, at 16:41, Christine Aguila wrote:
Frank: Another great one! I think Doug suggested to keep the color
sign
and make
William Robb wrote:
I feel the same way about FP4+. One of the girls in my wifes office is a
fairly avid photographer who really wants to buy a darkroom. I'm wondering
now if I should offer to sell her the equipment I would use if I set another
darkroom up, or keep that stuff and sell her
Very nice. Beautiful pic. I wouldn't crop it. The sky is compelling as are the
foregrund shadows. I would clone out that stick that's on the corner of the
snow bank. Good work.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/02/08 Fri PM 10:23:23 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Does anyone recognize this language?
Cotty wrote:
On 08/02/08, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hungarian
Ám ettõl függetlenül, vagy talán éppen
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/02/08 Fri PM 09:15:27 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Peso - On a windy day
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2008/02/on-windy-day.html
Should I crop this one a bit? Suggestions appreciated.
Just the bottom, enough to
Cotty wrote:
On 08/02/08, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hungarian
Ám ettõl függetlenül, vagy talán éppen ezért.
Translation: My nipples explode with delight.
What? I thought that was Please fondle my buttocks?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Cotty wrote:
My nipples explode with delight.
--
MARK!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 08/02/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2008/02/on-windy-day.html
Should I crop this one a bit? Suggestions appreciated.
No. Perfect. Brilliant :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Cotty wrote:
On 08/02/08, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
I suppose the end result should be the driving factor, and that the
stuff in the middle shouldn't really matter. But for me that part in
the middle is the most fun. I'll try the digital thing again when
traditional
- Original Message -
From: Ken Waller
Subject: Re: OT:Does anyone recognize this language?
Beats the alternative tho
I dunno, I'd kind of like to be young
WW
Being old sucks!:-).
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I've kept all my darkroom stuff, including two cold light enlargers. One for
35mm and one for 6x7 and 4x5. But I haven't used them in a couple of years, and
I might change my mind if I move.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008, at 16:41, Christine Aguila wrote:
Frank: Another great one! I think Doug suggested to keep the color
sign
and make everything BW. I think that suggestion has some interesting
possibilities. Enjoyed seeing this. Cheers, Christine
I disagree.
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please fondle my buttocks
MARK!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Hi All,
I'm busy designing this site : www.fahmphotography.com for a buddy of
mine, he now wants to sell his photo's online. Anybody here doing that,
preferably in Aussie though. I would like to know which gateway service
you are using, and if they are any good.
Thanks
Feroze
--
PDML
Scott Loveless wrote:
Cotty wrote:
If you're at GFM this year, I've got something for you to try that could
change your mind.
Too late. I tried César's M3 last year.
Speaking of which, I left my film in that camera. Ever get around to
souping it, César?
--
Scott Loveless
I finally got around to looking at this one. Very nice, David. A
beautiful scene, well captured.
Paul
On Feb 8, 2008, at 6:56 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Ah, got ya.
I took a few from different angles, but yes some closer shots might
work. I'll head back there, its not far.
Dave
On Feb 7,
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
