On 22/12/06, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what I want someone to invent is a little gadget that you can apply
to your TV
that keeps the volume absolutely at the same at all times once you have
adjusted it
to the level you can hear. If they can build rockets to go to the
On 22/12/06, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I turned off my computer last night, I got 838 *new* messages on
the Pentax-Discuss list!
Eight Hundred Thirty Eight!
Seems like a lot of Pentaxians had very little else to do last night!
I've no idea what was important or what
On 23/12/06, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No idea what HD stands for...
High Definition.. whoops.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
On 23/12/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/22/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
01 110010 00100111 1101011 01110110110 1010110 1100110 101011 000101001
What brought on the change of heart?
Not so much a change in heart, but with the new Pentax digital, as
Mark
On 23/12/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a photo I'd like to make, but the widest lens I have is still too
long as it forces me to include an undesirable object in the frame and I
don't want to mess around with cloning the object out of the scene. I will
need to borrow a
On 23/12/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basic trigonometry. God, even the numbers
are the easiest possible to calculate
(dont even need a calculator for that
baby). You need a 90 degree
lens horizontally to just cover
the object. The way to calculate f.l.
is to use same ratios
On 23/12/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Smacking forehead! I've got f-calc on this machine. Thanks for the
reminder.
I've got another handy one for you:
http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/technical/depth_of_field_calc.html
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
On 23/12/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today we have had 55 days of rain here. Off course it haven't poured down
every day, but it has rained. If it continues tomorrow we will touch the
1920 record of raining.
Knarf is thinking DSRL.
We do live in disturbing times.
We are at the
On 23/12/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, I'm not abandonning film. Far from it. I intend film will
remain my primary medium for serious work (such as it is).
At least, that's what I say now...
So did I, but I'm sort of staying true to form, I still shoot my
Mamiya 7 for
On 23/12/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nope, what you gave was impossible.
18mm and 15mm are not possible (the
lengths you provided) because
Pentax APS always needs a lens 2/3 the length
of FF 35mm for same angle of view. I dont care what calculator
you used, it's wrong if it
On 23/12/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may be coming as well.
Again I can't really do it 2007 but I wouldn't mind a London PDML meet
around mid March 2007 if anyone is keen ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 25/12/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you (general you) ever thought about the fact that we here are this
list are so well off that we are only bothered by things that do not
affect us directly. The other 80% of the people in the world should have
it so good.
I think that you
On 26/12/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If human activity is indeed affecting the climate, as it may well be
doing, the change couldn't possibly be so substantial as to result in
serious year-to-year changes. All scientists will agree with that.
Weather comes and goes, and while
On 27/12/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course all that evidence is bullshit because the world did not exist
until I was born, and will cease to exist at my death. GRIN
You'll note that generally the people issuing more concern over the
perceived threat of global warming tend to
On 28/12/06, George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The SR and low light performance of the K10d is leading me down the
path to a style change.
I may have mentioned before that very early on it exposed a problem
with my technique. Somewhere along the line I had developed a bad
habit of
On 28/12/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Turner and Hooch?
= slobber
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On 29/12/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly. I never met a camera I couldn't get used to. The grip on a
Speed Graphic sucks unless you have the flash attached:-).
I found the bare P67 easier to grip than the K10D. It's not a case of
just getting used to it, the K10D grip
On 24/12/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23/12/06, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
I may be in UK around that time. I'm going over to visit my youngest son. I
will be going, but the time frame is uncertain at the moment.
If I'm there, I'm very keen.
March for a London PDML
On 26/12/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About twenty odd folks of the free ranging circle (photography,
motorcycles, gay running/walking club, etc) gathered at our apartment
yesterday afternoon and into the evening. It was a fine event with
much conversation and laughter,
On 29/12/06, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of the most pompous, dumbest, and most ill informed people I know
have a college education, some of them with advanced degrees. On the
flip side, some of the warmest, smartest people I know do not.
Both points of which have been exemplified
On 29/12/06, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even more effective is wrapping them in a real kitchen towel (remember
them? made of cotton, or linen, or the like ...), and twisting. That
squeezes far more water out of the grated potato(e)s than you can if
you do it by hand. The
On 29/12/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aren't we going OT now?
I have an urge to say that I don't feel that my smoking habits are the real
issue. To me, this seems like a smokescreen (pun intended) cowering the real
debate.
If you stand outside to smoke you're likely doing yourself
On 29/12/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run two NT machines now at work.
Hey, didi i tell you, i'm a mapper now.:-)
Anywho, i seem to not be able to open anything on my web site.
Can someone who has NT try and open any link from my 2006 show links.
I cannot do it with the
On 30/12/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, I've never had a metal shaving appear in a lens, although I've
had dust and other debris in lenses. I would disassemble that lens
and remove the sliver. If it's a manual focus 50, you might as well
try to do it yourself, as the price
On 30/12/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's hope the Pentax 645D is a trifle less expensive that that. I
expect it will be, but more than around $4000 and it's well out of my
league, for the present anyway.
If it ever surfaces (unlikely now IMO) my guess is that it would be
On 30/12/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A studio stand like that would be a luxury for me at this point, but
if business justified it I think I'd buy one. A couple years ago I
tried one out with a 'blad. Determined to get one for myself, I
priced a few of them. The tripod is
On 30/12/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't imagine why the 645D wouldn't surface. It's in the pipeline,
and a lot of well-connected people consider it a foregone conclusion.
Pentax now has more resources than they ever did. This camera will
make a statement. I know from your
On 30/12/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob's glasses are black and blinding:-).
Not so, practically I don't even own a pair of sun-glasses. ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 30/12/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed you're right. I've downloaded ACR 3.6 as was suggested but no
improvement has come from it. Now if someone would build an ACR profile
for K10D ;-)...
I do, but for ACR2.4. I know there is at least one other PDMLer that
has profiles
On 30/12/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what the international numbers are, but locally Pentax
is definitely taking a bigger piece of the pie than ever before. All
local camera stores are now selling the K cameras. Very few of them
sold the *ist series cameras. One
On 31/12/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It can have a detrimental effect on some of the metals that were in the fuel
delivery systems of the day.
Mainly due to the fact that ethanol is a hydrophile I believe?
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10
On 31/12/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/12/06, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
Gel as in gellatin
Okay, gelatin :-)
Gelatinous?
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
On 01/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think any of this proves a thing.
It was discussed on dpreview in the first few days the camera was
actually in users hands, frankly I as inferred I hope its IR
sensitivity sucks. I've had too many IR induced colour problems due to
the
On 31/12/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the grain on that shot reminds me of the type of grain that cheap
Kodak ISO 200 film used to have. I disliked it and stopped using the
film for that reason, but it's interesting to see it replicated
digitally.
I'm not particularly enamoured with the
On 01/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Rob, that makes sense. It's much more clear than aha? :-))
Perhaps my D will become my IR camera. I think I'll try the same shot
with both bodies and see what I get.
I've been toying with the thought of converting my *ist D to a true
On 01/01/07, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've heard people say this repeatedly about shooting through
polarization, but I've never seen totally blacked out due to
polarizing filters. Am I just using crap for filters or what?
No, polarizers are very difficult to build to cover the
On 01/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although it may be bad news for you, that would seem to be good news
for Pentax.
That's an interesting conclusion to draw given that we can only assume
the reasons that they aren't available. If Pentax can't manage to
supply potential buyers
On 01/01/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The limit is that the pixel sites on the sensor have a definite depth to
them, rather like millions of bogroll tubes bundled together.
Great analogy but only half the problem as photo-sites get smaller :-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
On 01/01/07, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...and lots of beautiful photos.
We're back from France and I'm in the process of scanning the 48
rollfilms I've brought back. Thank heavens there are only four frames on
each of them. 6x17 clearly has its advantages. :-)
Hi Ralf,
On 01/01/07, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using an Epson V700 with Vuescan. And since the original film
holders of the V700 are a total disgrace, I've bought the rollfilm
holder of the F-3200 as a spare.
As luck would have it, it has just the right height if I put it on
On 02/01/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I checked with Lifepixels about converting one of my istD's, but they
don't refit and Pentax for some reason.
Yes I noticed, however if given the filter dimensions I'm sure that
they would cut to size for a price.
I'm sure you and many
On 02/01/07, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was an interview article with Nikon on FF subject. Among other things
they said, they have been observing Canon 5D sales for a while but it never
went beyond 5% of total DSLR sales. FF sensor cost in case of 5D is still
over 6 times
On 02/01/07, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same here - I've only cleaned the DS twice using the Pec Pads/Eclipse method.
Took a while to work up the courage but it was surprisingly quick and easy.
I blow my cameras out using my compressor every month or so even if I
can;t see dust,
On 02/01/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had pretty much the same experience - I've shot panos both on a leveled
tripod handheld have experienced no problems getting panoramaker to
stitch them together.
Use a WA lens in portrait mode and combine near and far field objects
in
On 02/01/07, Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was on an *ist-D. Reading one of the translated interviews here on
the K10D, I noted that a reference was made to coating the sensor with a
special anti-dust coating. I made a note to myself to be sure to check
that the K10D sensor was
On 02/01/07, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob
What sort of compressor do you use?
It's one that I bought second hand from a photo-finisher business that
shut up shop. It uses a modified refrigeration compressor with
pressure controller which feeds into a paper filter which removes
On 02/01/07, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dave
since I only will make flat panoramas made out of 3-6 shots and not 360
degree round ones I would love to see the difference in a panorama with and
without nodal point adjustment of the camera for my requirements . Has
anybody a link
On 02/01/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize this will vary from lens to lens, but what is the median size of
the projected image circle on the Pentax lenses you are familiar with? I
suppose one should take the smallest value if the projection changes size
with aperture.
My
On 02/01/07, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gang,
Does anyone know if card readers constructed for plain SD cards will
work with the new SDHC cards?
If they adhere to the SDHC spec they should read regular SD cards
without a problem.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
On 02/01/07, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For years I've been touting the various iterations of the Imacon here often
to be met with comments about people not seeing any appreciable difference,
comments (based on some technical crap or web articles) that a good flat
bed scanner is
On 03/01/07, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The price difference in absolute dollars
between FF and APS has and will continue
to drop. As it gets lower and lower, the
benefit/(price difference) ratio will get
too high to make APS attractive or maybe
even eventually feasable. Thats
On 03/01/07, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder how many of us are doing what our education prepared us
for? In my case I majored in zoology
I'm an engineer, now engaged in child care!
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL
On 03/01/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This arrived in my inbox. I think it was meant to go to the list
- Original Message -
From: Bronek Kozicki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Full frame vs APS-C was: Re: PESO - Hertzlia Marina vs K10D
Quoting William Robb [EMAIL
On 02/01/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, I'm (mostly) happy with the results I get from the *ist-D.
The problem comes with the shots I *don't* get, for a variety
of reasons (the most common ones being failure of the AF system
to achieve a lock fast enough in low light/low
On 03/01/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/02 Tue PM 12:59:32 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: SDHC and card readers?
On 02/01/07, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gang,
Does
On 03/01/07, Bronek Kozicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
B obviously hasn't looked at too many big Canon or Leica M8 produced
images.
http://www.pbase.com/cameras/canon/eos_5d (only currently 281942 sample
images)
and how many from wide
On 03/01/07, Bronek Kozicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Silicon is least part of price, it is yield that matters. And it drops
exponentially with increase of size of sensor, thus making production
expensive.
Grated, that's why I said at least, yields may be able to be improved
(as they have been
On 03/01/07, Bronek Kozicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And for those interested in best quality and high resolution, I'd suggest
searching in ebay for 67 and 645 Pentax lenses - prices will soar later this
year. And it is much less speculative prediction than the whole FF thingy.
This assumes
On 03/01/07, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also used in audio systems. my little understanding is that the advantage
using them is that they are more efficient than other transistors, in other
word more power, less spill heat.
MOSFET power devices are often used in the output stages of
On 03/01/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just take two shots with a wide angle lens in a confined space by
rotating on the spot and attempt to stitch them
What kind of camera to subject distance are we talking about here?
2 to 3m distance will cause all sorts of problems. I
On 03/01/07, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What they call blind test is rampant. They exhibit images taken by
various cameras including 5D (usually more than 5 images taken by different
cameras) and see if anyone can tell the difference. This of course is more
for an entertainment
On 03/01/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A 20/2.8, FA 24/2.8. FA 24/2
Maybe A24/2.8 ;-)
The beauty of which is even if there is some vignetting with the FF WA
lenses given that the sensor density would likely be lower the
requirements for absolute resolution would be reduced and CA would
On 03/01/07, Bronek Kozicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you seem to forgot that the new Hoya Pentax company will launch in
October -- I'd be surprised if 645D does not go to market before this
date, and I'd be shocked if it is pulled back with no good reason other
than merger.
I think I'd fall
On 03/01/07, Bronek Kozicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
she does not ;-P and I'm not going to argue with you other points, as
they might be true indeed. The fact is I'm just losing patience seeing
discussion that could end up like whinning when Pentax will finally
release full frame camera?!.
On 03/01/07, Bronek Kozicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Digital Image Studio wrote:
factor relative to FF 35mm ;-)
keyword underscored.
...and?
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au
On 03/01/07, Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They do...
I have a cheapo reader and it does read the Extreme
III SD cards. However, I've only used it twice; I'm
now just dumping directly from the camera.
The Extreme III are still SD cards they don't conform to SDHC spec.
and for what
On 03/01/07, Margus Männik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that most of the hi-fi enthusiasts don't know and doesn't care
what MOSFET stands for and what it really means... ;)
Yes, they are too busy trying to hear the difference between digital
interconnects :-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE
On 02/01/07, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was an interview article with Nikon on FF subject. Among other things
they said, they have been observing Canon 5D sales for a while but it never
went beyond 5% of total DSLR sales. FF sensor cost in case of 5D is still
over 6 times
On 03/01/07, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I was just lucky so far that I did not use anything wider than a 50mm?
I will make the next panos again with the Pentax 50mm or 100mm.
greetings
Markus
Not really, you could be lucky and the natural point of rotation of
your
On 03/01/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've yet to see a decent 35mm scan from a flatbed, mostly because the
holders suck horribly. MF and LF scans on the other hand can get quite
good with the higher-end scanners, if not quite up to a Nikon 9000's output.
I have an LS-8000, V700 and
On 03/01/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that they may actually be loss-leading the 5D at the moment
(given the massive rebates on it right now). It may be that they make
more per unit on normal pricing than the K100D or K110D do (Given the
very aggressive pricing in that
On 03/01/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always thought of him as a kind of super-charged version of Ace
Smoke me a kipper, I'll be home for breakfast! Rimmer, with bigger
balls and a better tan.
That's ridiculously complimentary... for Ken ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
On 03/01/07, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...or the effects of the green pen on the CD edges that was sold some
years ago. That was really crap .-)
True, but did you ever see the green polymer stabilizer rings that
were designed to snugly fit on the edge of CDs? I actually used them
on my
On 03/01/07, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I dont beleive there are no other pentax
wide lenses that would not work as well or better
on FF digital as the necessary shorter lenses do on APS digital. Anyone
know anyone whos used them that way? (
maybe that guy whos using them
On 03/01/07, Margus Männik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
interconnects... they are talkin' about differences in POWER cables of
home audio equipment :)
I'm quite a big fan of hi-fi audio equipment (mostly car audio last
years) myself, but I've never understood the language they talk...
Yes, I had
On 03/01/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe we should take up a collection and send one to the guy who runs
16-9.net. he does quite good lens tests on FF and 1.6x crop bodies, has
been doing a series on 14/15mm's and already has the basic adaptor (He
tested the A* 85/1.4 against the
My current occupation is still very new to me, I had zero training and
no intentions of getting into this line of work but as we all know
life delivers these little challenges from time to time. To date I've
refrained from posting any kid pics to the list but I've just put
together a very QD page
On 03/01/07, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Rob Id ownloaded the article and will read it.
I never had anything near in the foreground in the few panos I did, that
must be the point.
Very true, however if you do it's always good to have some knowledge
and potential solutions up
On 03/01/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob, I should mention (and admit ;-) ) that those who told me K10D will
grow on me were right. Right now I find K10D ergonomics *absolutely*
natural. It is slightly big but I've found certain way to grip it so
that I definitely don't look
On 03/01/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One arm will start to look like Popeye's
Maybe but I really don't expect my fingers to elongate, that's where
the problem lies, it's a bit like providing 2.5 diameter grips on a
motorcycle ie about as practical as ape hanger bars.
--
Rob
On 03/01/07, Bronek Kozicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
full frame is not a format name. It can be used as a format name only
if supplemented by information which frame ? In citation above it is
35mm, or 135, and the crop factor is relative to full frame of 135
format. It annoys me that you
On 03/01/07, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I switched from OK to very expensive cables from the CD player to my
good old Audiolab amplifier and didn't notice much difference, but from there
to the ProAc loudspeakers the wires does, of course, get more important.
There's a lot of
On 03/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. I've never experienced fatigue factor with any camera, but
I hold them only when shooting. The rest of the time they hang around
my neck. Helps prevent costly drops as well as eliminating fatigue.
I do a lot of bush walking and
On 03/01/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't remember details - I'm webmailing from work, so the proper mails are
at home. We are waiting on one of our Australian colleagues to get his
finger out and give us a date.
Qué, get my finger out of my date? ;-)
I have the schedule
On 03/01/07, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. They should have low and frequency- and current-independent
impedance within the range suitable for the speakers and amplifier, and the
easy way to achieve this is to make them thick. My cables are constituted by
two pairs of fairly
On 04/01/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...the leaky top and side curtains... :-P
And all the leg room :-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer
On 04/01/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Funny, but I think the grip on the K10D makes it easier to hold the
camera in a horizontal position, as well as vertical. I think what it
is, the grip allows the pinky finger to share the gripping motion of
the rest of the fingers rather
On 04/01/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/1/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hey, it's simple, and it does the job. What more do you need?
Flash and Gmail.
What's that? You want a Gmail account?
LOL
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
On 04/01/07, Margus Männik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Picky doesn't mean that they know how things work. Some do, most, as
always, pretend.
I've got my MP3 coding/decoding chain pretty sorted now and I'd love
to execute a double blind listening test on some golden eared
audiophiles. I'm sure
On 04/01/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Psalm 146:4 states: His spirit goes out, he goes back to his ground; in
that day his thoughts do perish.
In addition the concept of an immortal soul with a conciousness that
survives the body and goes on to exist somewhere renders moot the concept
On 04/01/07, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally, a PESO that's a little different than most! I like it quite a bit.
LOL, so do I.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
On 04/01/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I researched this a fair bit a while back, out of historical interest.
Did you discover anything interesting?
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 05/01/07, W. Guy Finley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're still running Windows 98? Well, sooner or later I think
you're going to have to move on because more and more programs are
requiring Windows XP. Personally, buying a nice camera like a K100D
or K110D and then using a clunky program
On 05/01/07, Lawrence Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are correct, and *if* this Tokina did have the SMC coating, has
there been any previous SMC lenses with this poor flare control? I almost
take it for granted that SMC = excellent flare control. Am I wrong?
Flare control isn't simply
On 05/01/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Holy Man!!!
That lens has 18!! elements in 14 groups.
Thats 28 air/glass interfaces, and 8 glass/glass interfaces.
Consider that when you judge it's flare resistance in what can only be
described as a torture test.
OTOH, my old SMC
On 04/01/07, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Godders on that point. While we use different approaches to
hold the camera, the concept is the same. I use a wrist strap attached to
the t'pod socket, and have done so for years. Over time I've gathered a
few straps (even
On 05/01/07, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not quite :) I was alluding to the dozens of times I've seen/heard
these things explode when something goes wrong in a prototype...
I've made 5mm LEDs ricochet too (on purpose), pretty impressive.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
On 06/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One terabyte would probably keep me in storage space for another two
or three years. But I could fill it faster if I tried.
I've had a 1TB RAID in operation since May and I've actually managed
to reduce my storage requirements since then. The
On 06/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My OS is only a tiny fraction of my drive space. Photos constitute at
least 90% of my available space.
My server OS resides on a partition that's 1% of my array and 63% of
this space is free.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
On 06/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a pic I rescanned on my friend's Imacon. I treated it somewhat
differently as well, both in terms of the crop and the rendering, but I
still think there's a distinct difference. Note the detail in the
background trtees.
The imacon
1 - 100 of 1760 matches
Mail list logo
