Not specifically a reply to Alex, just tagging into the thread here
with a couple of comments.
I've read the reviews and a bunch of the threads on DPreview and found
them interesting.
If you read the review and try to stay objective, he's saying that
Pentax hasn't designed the JPEG conversion to
Bob -
My opinion is that if it's working, you shouldn't be able to feel it.
If you can feel it, it will be inducing it's own blur.
If the sensor is counteracting your movement I would think it's motion
would be imperceptible.
My introduction to Pentax SR was with the A10 point and shoot. If
I always find this discussion a bit entertaining. Especially when I
hear that question about why people buy an expensive SLR to shoot
JPGs.
I don't think most of the folks that hang around this group have a
real appreciation for how little most non-hobbyists understand about
photography. I do
Mark - I have the feature turned off and only activate it after
changing lenses.
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
On 12/18/06, Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the folks who have K10D's - how have you set the dust removal
setting? I originally set it to turn on with every
Your ist-D already takes high capacity CF cards.
See you later, gs
On 12/20/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 20, 2006, at 9:53 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 08:29:02PM +0900, David Savage wrote:
http://www.pentax.co.jp/english/support/
Cheers,
Amita -
After taking a quick look at the two manuals on the Pentax website, I
think you have the relative functionality of both cameras nailed.
The two cameras are aimed at different audiences, but they both have
an adjustment for exposure compensation. That's a feature I wouldn't
want to be
Just a couple of semi-related items:
Warren Buffet and Bill Gates recently ate a local restaurant when
Gates visited town.
I snapped these shots of the Restaurant's tongue-in-cheek marquee.
http://georges.smugmug.com/gallery/763341
Not great art, just a fun snapshot.
After you're checked out
Shel -
I have to throw my vote in with the Lithium AAs. On the D, I'm
getting about 1000-1200 shots per set of four. A 4-pack is $9.99 at
target. The CR-V3's perform better but are as much as twice the
price.
I seldom use the built-in flash. When I feel the need for flash I use
an external
Shel - Which raw converter are you using? gs
On 9/3/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, i did something like you suggested, and the final results were
better, although for the purpose of putting the images up I wanted to show
them with no adjustments. I was hoping you'd
Shel - have you tried formatting the card with your pc?
I'm willing to believe the Ds has a problem, but I'm more willing to
believe you have a bad card. That little switch on the SD cards it
pretty tiny. It's the thing I like least about SD cards.
See you later, gs
On 9/3/05, Shel
Hi Marnie -
I bought S40's for my kids last Christmas. (What a grandfather will do
to get pictures of the grandkids!)
The cameras work well and I am being supplied with lots of photos.
The camera is well suited to their needs. Lithium AA's last a long
time. Photos are relatively well exposed
There are a lot of differences between CS and CS2. Of these there are
a few I use often:
You can straighten and crop an image in Camera Raw, these changes are
non-destructive and are stored in the DNG file.
The major camera raw sliders all now have an auto setting. For most
of the stuff I
Shel -
I bought Elements 3 to get the updated version of Photoshop Album. I
don't use the Elements part of it much these days.
Here's a link to a screen shot of the single PE3 raw converter screen
and five shots showing the CS2 raw converter with each of it's five
tabs selected.
Replying in general to long URLs...
You can include a long URL as long as you surround it with these
long url in here
Most popular mail programs will correctly interrpret anything between
the 's as a single URL, even if it spans more than one line.
See you later, gs
JCO -
I agree with you in concept. But, in the end, no matter how many
folks write to Pentax about their old lenses it's just not going to
make any difference.
I'm one of the guys with an old screw mount Spotmatic and a few
lenses. It served me well from 1968 through 2001 when I bought my 5n.
Just adding my two cents on evaluating noise on the screen vs. prints.
I agree with Paul. I've noticed that my ink jet prints show much less
noise than I would have been led to believe was there by the screen
rendition. I don't know if this is a side effect of the printer's
conversion software
I convert my raw files to DNG, then make a set of reasonably sized jpegs.
Everything gets mirrored to another external hard drive. Once a month
all the new stuff goes to DVDs.
Storage is relatively cheap and getting cheaper. It's certainly
cheaper than processing the equivalent amount of film.
Don -
I'm one of those guys that went to autofocus because it's almost
impossible to focus quickly with my bifocals, so... take this question
with a grain of salt.
Because of the bifocals I fiddle with the diopter correction more than
I'd like. I always focus on something at the far end of the
Kostas - That certainly clarifies it. (Sorry about the pun.) gs
On 9/26/05, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, George Sinos wrote:
My guess is the correction has more to do with the distance from the
focusing screen to the eyepiece than anything else
These photos were taken with the 3 megapixel version of the OptioMX.
I've had it for over a year and am still surprised by this odd little
camera.
It has a nice combination of size and features and is great for those
times when you don't want to carry anything very large.
Here are a few
Here's my morning drive.
http://Georges.smugmug.com/photos/37815932-M.jpg
Eastbound traffic goes straight into the morning Sun.
See you later, gs
http://www.georgesphotos.net
A few folks wondered about the lens, etc:
The car was at a dead stop, so I opened the window and held the
OptioMX steady on top of the side view mirror. The OptioMX has a
5.8mm-58mm zoom lens, f2.8-f3.5. The exif data says the exposure was
1/750 second at f/8, ISO 100, 7mm focal length.
I
We held belt sander races at last year's woodworkers picnic.
Here's a link:
http://georges.smugmug.com/gallery/170694/1
The belt sander shots are near the end of the gallery.
See you later, gs
http://www.georgesphotos.net
Shel -
My Photo site is hosted at Smugmug. They offer an excellent product
for a reasonable price. Go to http://www.smugmug.com and click on
help.
The bottom line is for $29.95 per year you get unlimited storage
space. At that level I think you get 4 gigabytes/month of bandwidth.
It's hard
Cotty wrote, requesting info on a digital camera primer.
Cotty -
I teach a couple of non-credit courses at the local community college.
The materials at this site http://www.shortcourses.com/ seem to work
very well for beginners.
In particular a short course in choosing a digital camera and a
John
Don't know about the manual, but had to toss my two cents into the
conversation on Picture Window Pro.
I used Picture Window Pro at home and Photoshop at work up through
Photoshop version 7 and never felt the need to spend the money on
Photoshop for my hobby photography. In fact, I felt
to the reasonable
price, it's pretty much a win-win situation.
And thanks to the link to the Koren site. Plenty there to while away the
idle hour!
John
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 00:44:30 +0100, George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John
Don't know about the manual, but had to toss my two cents
Ann -
Have you used the free Open Office software suite? It's the free
alternative to some of Microsoft's office products. Among other
things the latest version included their take on Word.
What will make it helpful for your needs it can output your document
directly to PDF format.
You can
On 10/31/05, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on the complexity
of digital point and shoots cameras and the less than useful,
extremely large manuals.
Graywolf
I've mentioned before that I teach a how to use your new digital
camera class at the local community college.
The requirements are to
around the office.
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
On 2/22/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/10/06, George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I picked up the DA 40mm a few days ago. Here's a sunrise I captured
on the way to work yesterday.
http://georgesphotos.net
Bruce -
This is a classic. I like the way the muted colors don't overpower
the textures.
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
On 2/22/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was taken the same day as the Angry Sea shot, but we had moved to
a different beach.
Pentax *istD, A
Jens -
This one would look good over my mantle. With all that detail it
needs to be printed large.
gs
http://georgesphotos.net
On 3/5/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a shot I took today - a small creek somewhere in Denmark - perhaps
40 km from Copenhagen.
I'll expand a little on my earlier comment.
I think this is one of those photos that must be large to be
appreciated. Its one of those photos that you put over your mantle or
on the wall in your office or den. The kind you sit back and look at,
and every time you see it a different part of the
My original OptioS died a couple of weeks ago, leaving me without a
pocket sized camera.
I was anxious to try out the A10 as a replacement. I stopped by my
local camera store, thinking they would not have it yet, intending to
have them call me when they arrived.
Unfortunately, they were in in
I don't know if many of you follow the
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/ web site. The owner, Michael
Reichmann finances the site by selling DVDs.
The current DVD (#14) has a fairly long segment that contains a tour
of Butcher's darkroom and a walk-a-long on a shoot in a swamp.
Butcher makes
Jerome -
That is a great group of shots. It looks like you kept your wits
about you in the bad weather and early morning.
Lately, I've also started using the higher ISO settings on the D and
have been very satisfied. The high ISO performance is one big
advantage over my old film shooting days.
After an unusually dry and warm Winter, the Midwest was hit with
several inches of snow on the first day of Spring.
This lawn sprinkler was parked outside and caught in the snow.
http://georgesphotos.net/photos/61509111-M.jpg
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
I've had the Optio A10 for a couple of weeks and have taken quite a
few photos, mainly snapshot type stuff.
Here's the link to a gallery with a few samples.
http://georgesphotos.net/Photography
Comments on the A10:
I haven't yet found anything in the exif data to tell me when the
anti-shake
I just saw over at http://www.luminous-landscape.com/ that ivew was
just purchased by Microsoft.
It's under What's New in update #2 to the June 27 entry. There's
a link to an opinion written by the author of The DAM book
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
On 6/26/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi
Not specifically replying to Paul, just tagging onto the thread here...
I've been teaching non-credit photography classes at the local
community college for a bit over three years now.
The basic class is aimed at family photographers. At first, this
class was filled with people trying to figure
On 7/3/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mike,
snip
- IR, UV, X-Ray ... all are easily accessible, specialized cameras
that expand the capabilities are also available.
snip
G
I agree with Godfrey here, but in the case above it's probably fair to
point out, that other than
Ann - I just bought an adaptor for about $20 that will let you put an
SD card into a CF slot.
It looks like a CF card with a slot that accepts the SD card.
I have a bunch of CF cards for the istD and all of my other cameras
take SD cards. For $20, it seemed like a good idea.
See you later, gs
Back when I still shot film I had settled on Kodak's Portra UC. It
was touted to have been developed to scan well. My experience with
the color was very good. It was one of the few films that did a good
job on both skin tones and vivid colors.
The brighter colors were well saturated, but not
On July 1 - the local kite club held their Red, White and Blue Festival.
Here's a link to a few photos from the event:
http://georgesphotos.net/gallery/1638381
This is a friendly bunch of guys. They had seen the photos I took at
last October's event and let me have the run of the field. I got
I forgot to say these were taken with either the DA 16-45mm or the
50-200mm on the istD.
Thanks for the comments.
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
On 7/7/06, George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On July 1 - the local kite club held their Red, White and Blue Festival.
Here's a link
Fourth of July was busy. The City of Ralston, Nebraska always
celebrates the Fourth in a big way.
I've split the photos into two galleries, one for the parade and one
for the fireworks.
The parade shots were all taken with the DA 16-45 and 50-200 on the
istD. Mostly with the former.
The
Thanks, That's my favorite shot of the bunch.
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
On 7/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/7/2006 11:20:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On July 1 - the local kite club held their Red, White and
Bruce -
This is beautiful. It's another one of the images that probably looks
much better when printed very large.
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
On 8/2/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of several beaver ponds in the park near my home.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/5,
Russell Brown is one of those guys that has the gift of clearly
explaining relatively complex topics. Combine this with his knowledge
of Photoshop and you have a guy that can create excellent tutorials
His style is a bit odd. He reminds me a bit of a combination of Mr.
Rogers and Bill Nye the
Bill and all -
I had an interesting Anti-shake experience last weekend.
I've mentioned before that I teach photography classes at the local
community college. In the basic class I connect the AV output of a
point and shoot camera to the classroom video projector. This allows
the group to see
Don -
Is this something you can fix in raw conversion?
http://georgesphotos.net/gallery/796655
These are the screens from the CS2 raw converter, I was thinking the
Calibrate tab (last photo on the page) might be what you're looking
for.
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
--
PDML
Just tagging onto the thread here - not arguing with Paul -
I use one of the Stroboframes with flash quite often:
http://www.tiffen.com/products.html?tablename=stroboframe
With this, or even with a long telephoto I find the wheels much more convenient.
When I use the bracket I'm always
I'll go along with that.
Last year I scanned a few hundred of my Father's old slides from the
late fifties and early sixties. At the same time I scanned a bunch of
my stuff from the late sixties and seventies.
The Kodachrome looked like it was developed yesterday. Can't say the
same about a
After reading the press releases on the new A20 and M20 I have figured
out the killer feature that will make him give up his medium format
equipment.
Wait for it..
Face Recognition Mode
Sorry, it's a dirty job but someone had to say it.
See you later, gs
The recent discussion of memory cards prompted me to fill what may be
a niche market for carrying cases.
I may have a limited number of these nostalgic SD card carrying cases
available for sale.
Most are the frosted variety with a plain black cap. Some caps have
labels printed with the names of
--- George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recent discussion of memory cards prompted me to
fill what may be
a niche market for carrying cases.
I may have a limited number of these nostalgic SD
card carrying cases
available for sale.
Most are the frosted variety with a plain
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...clip...
However, the histogram (and apparently the blinkies
as well) in the *ist cameras describe the jpeg image. When shooting
RAW, some highlights that might shown as off the scale can actually be
accommodated. ...clip...
I agree with Paul, and
Hey look -
When you hold a Pentax up to the mirror it looks like Nikon
On 12/27/05, Albano Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.flaneur.albanogarcia.com.ar/2005/12/27/operado/ I'll be out of
business for about 3 to 4 weeks. I got a simple surgery on my hand due to a
Only slightly off topic. I saw a firewire/USB comparison on the
television show Call for Help.
The results were interesting. I don't remember the exact details, but
they used firewire and USB to transfer about 10 Gbytes of data. They
did the test on an apple and on a dell.
Here are the
Shel - I've never washed any of my bags. The closest I've come to
cleaning them is either brushing them with a stiff brush or blasting
them with a burst of air from the air compressor.
I have a bunch of bags, but primarily use two.
The Tamrac Velocity 9 is a one strap sling bag that is worn
Marnie -
Yeah - it's easy to recommend an expensive solution. But the key is
to have at least two copies. If the two copies can be different types
of media all the better.
In it's simplest form, it can be a working copy on your hard drive
with one or two sets of DVD's as backup. One can be
If you have your heart set on starting a new hobby of web site design,
you've received some good advice in the other messages.
Frankly, I think you'll do better saving that time for your photography.
Smugmug offers a bit of the best of both worlds. You can let them do
99 per cent of the work,
The screens are also interchangeable. Is there a bit of play involved
in the focusing screen? gs
On 1/29/06, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 29 Jan 2006 at 20:13, Gonz wrote:
I'm very disappointed with the viewfinder/base misalignment. This means
that you have
I picked up the DA 40mm a few days ago. Here's a sunrise I captured
on the way to work yesterday.
http://georgesphotos.net/gallery/781336/1/55859051/Large
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
Last October a local kite flyers club had a round-up at a nearby park.
I intended to drop by, grab a few quick shots and hit the road. Once
I arrived, it got a more interesting then I expected and I ended up
spending a couple of hours and filled a couple of memory cards.
I pulled a few shots
Just a short reply on the general topic -
The best reference I've see for this is Wayne Fulton's web site
http://www.scantips.com
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
Not a reply specifically to Mark's comment, but to the thread in general.
I read the article and remember reading that all of the cameras were
judged capable of eaisly making excellent images up to 11x14.
For all practical purposes, any of the differences in image quality
will be swamped out by
I was surprised by the sudden popularity of my A10 samples when I did
my daily check of my web site stats.
It had tallied a bit over 800 unique visitors since I posted the
samples on March 29th, then, over 2000 new unique visitors in the last
24 hours.
It turns out Smugmug (my site host) added
I have a feeling Shel is pulling our leg about not setting the clock in his DS.
For those of you that haven't thought about the clock. It's not just
there so you don't have to buy a watch. The time and date of exposure
is embedded in each photo. If you don't set the clock, this embedded
info
I've never paid much attention to the time it takes to do the Raw
conversion. The topic has come up again in this thread.
After returning from a visit to the local zoo I thought I'd keep track
of the conversion process.
So, for my three year old Dell, here are the times for 164 Raw files
from
Here are a few shots from the weekend's batch of wildlife photos.
http://georgesphotos.net/gallery/1373870
I printed most of these earlier today. Some of them look much better
when printed large. The bear and bison shots, in particular, look
better on paper.
See you later, gs
.
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
On 4/17/06, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
George Sinos wrote:
Here are a few shots from the weekend's batch of wildlife photos.
http://georgesphotos.net/gallery/1373870
You seemed to nail the exposure of this pelican. Nice pose too.
http
Here's a short quote from the page linked below:
The box of crayons you're given for displaying photos on the web is
called sRGB.
There are other color spaces, such as Adobe RGB (1998), but no
Windows-based browser can display them correctly. The Macintosh
browsers Safari and Internet Explorer
Don -
Check the documentation to be sure, but I'm positive it makes a point
that Picassa 2 never modifies the originals.
See you later, gs
On 4/21/06, Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip If it were not that Picassa2 alters the originals...
download time for the 1K
byte or so of profile data.
Godfrey
On Apr 21, 2006, at 2:56 PM, George Sinos wrote:
Here's a short quote from the page linked below:
The box of crayons you're given for displaying photos on the web is
called sRGB.
There are other color spaces
The guy that wrote those articles is Chris MacAskill, President of
Smugmug, the photo sharing service.
He's done a bit of research on this topic to help his customers get
predictable results.
I think the bottom line is, if you use Adobe RGB it will look washed
out when viewed with a windows
This one's all about subtle tonal variation. It looks surprisingly
good on my screen. I'm guessing an old fashioned chemical print would
look great.
GS
On 4/23/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/trees_in_fog.html
From an old negative ...
Shel
OK Godfrey -
This is the kind of thing that drives me nuts until I figure it out.
First - in the context of this message I agree that the metadata isn't
extraneous junk. Especially your copyright data.
Now, let's talk about the ICC profile.
If you're using a Mac, the ICC profile is not
Lots of good answers in this thread.
Here's my theory and practice. I back up to more than one type of
media, and store the copies in more than one location.
All of my files are stored on two different hard drives with two
additional copies on DVDs. The DVD sets are stored in two different
And of course, five minutes after I wrote all that I checked the
release notes. They just made the formal announcement of all of that
stuff here:
http://blogs.smugmug.com/release-notes/
On 4/27/06, George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lots of good answers in this thread.
much deleted
I didn't mean to sound critical of your post Shel.
I agree that the proprietary formats are a bad thing for the
photographer and photography in general.
I'm a big fan of DNG and convert my raw files immediately.
There's a couple of reasons. First of all, with Adobe's clout, I
think DNG will
My experience is similar to others. I use the grip, but for my own
convenience, I only put batteries in the grip. I get about 800-1200
shots on a set of lithiums. These will last several shooting sessions
for me, so I don't feel the need to load two sets of batteries in the
camera.
I got
Bob -
I don't see the time or cost of format conversion as different than
the investment I'm making in scanning slides and prints into digital
formats. And digital files are much easier and cheaper to convert to
new formats than film and paper.
Usually these conversions can be performed over a
My wallet is glad the istD can take either. The difference in price
can be significant. The local Target store prices a two-pack of CRV3s
at $14.95 and a four-pack of AA's at $9.99.
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
On 4/30/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original
I thought I'd chime in on this one.
I just joined a local club in January.
Evidently, until this year they used a digital projector, a 35mm slide
projector and a third projector for two-and-a-quarter square format
slides. This is was in addition to prints.
This year the fellow that runs the
Not really replying to Marnie, just tacking on to the thread here -
Here's how I explained jpeg/RAW to some fairly non-technical folks.
If pictures were brownies, a raw file would be like a grocery sack
containing a brownie mix, eggs, water and oil. (or whatever else the
mix requires)
Within
Ann - I use publisher quite a bit and have wondered about this myself.
If you get an answer let me know. Thanks, gs
On 11/13/05, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok I have MS word _ I used tables to make pages in
a engagement calendar format
but word doesnt let me put something to the
Short version -
The hard drive on which I store my photos crashed. I restored the
backup copy and didn't lose anything but time. At the same time I
discovered a hole in my backup process and plugged it.
Long version -
Late last Saturday afternoon I returned from a surprise party. The
family
Godfrey -
Just a couple of questions.
Do you disconnect the backup drives when you're not using them?
and
Do you take anything off site?
GS
Given the number of good ideas here, it's probably not a bad place to
mention photo organization software.
Google offers Picasa at www.picasa.com. This is free software and is
a good inexpensive way to see what this type of software can do to
help you out.
My current organizer is imatch
Not really, this is a new book devoted to Digital Asset Management
from the viewpoint of the photographer.
http://thedambook.com/
I picked it up yesterday at the local Barnes and Noble and have been
using it as an excuse to not finish those Christmas Cards.
Chapter 1 is downloadable from the
Responding to the conversation on family photos -
I'm in the middle of a similar family project.
I thought the scanning would be tedious. Other than time consuming,
it's not that bad. The part I don't enjoy is taking the photos out of
the various album pages that the family has used over the
My guess it will be a huge hit at the big box electronics stores like
Best Buy and CompUSA.
gs
On 12/21/05, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if it will be sold without the lens.
Given the fierce competition in the DSLR field, who does Samsung think
will be the market for
Reminds me of what happened to watches in the 1970's.
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
On 8/27/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Douglas Newman wrote:
My thoughts exactly. They've replaced the ultra-precise,
very-limited-production, mechanical internals of a Leica with
Keppler always has an interesting take on the industry. He's been
around long enough to put things into perspective.
He's authored this article on the battle for the 10% of the DSLR
market not owned by the big two.
Marnie -
Welcome back the fold.
Just a little advice if you're trying to save a little cash. After
you get the new Pentax camera body, don't try out the DA 50-200 zoom.
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
of us who know him, is Burt. To anyone
else he is Herbert or Mr. Keppler. Show the man some respect.
Bob
On Sep 2, 2006, at 1:01 PM, George Sinos wrote:
Keppler always has an interesting take on the industry. He's been
around long enough to put things into perspective.
He's authored
For the type of work I do, I'm not sure I'd pay a lot more for a full
frame body. The 6mp istD has been more than satisfactory so far. The
10mp successor should be better.
Thinking down the line, a multi-megapixel FF upgrade will require more
memory, more disk space, and everything to support
This is rapidly becoming my favorite lens.
Here's an example, shot on the way to work yesterday. It was morning,
the Sun was on the way up, the mist and fog were hanging over the
fields.
I pulled off the highway and shot this out the side window of the car.
If you have the bandwidth, check the
At the end of August I attended the Lighter than Air Balloon Fair
sponsored by the Iowa Western Community College. The Nebraska Balloon
Club and several others put on a great show.
I was there for about three hours on Saturday evening and filled
several memory cards. This gallery contains some
301 - 400 of 919 matches
Mail list logo
