I don't know what those lenses bring on the market right now, but I'd
say don't repair it, state the condition honestly, and take what
comes. If you have a minimum price you won't let it go for less than,
put a reserve on it.
There's little point to putting $300 into a camera you want to
To protect them from inadvertent damage as much as possible.
G
On Apr 21, 2007, at 10:02 PM, Maris V. Lidaka Sr. wrote:
I like your idea, but why Dismount, disconnect, and unplug the
drives when
not in use for backup.?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Same here, only I use ChronoSync on Mac OS X to do the
synchronization work.
G
On Apr 21, 2007, at 11:43 PM, Toine wrote:
My setup is similar with one exception. I copy the files to the first
harddisc and the contents of this harddisc are synchronized daily with
dirsync to the second
I think it was AlexG who was looking for what this lens performed
like. I saw this posted on DPReview and thought it was a good example.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v733/alesk6/Flowers/2007-04-20-
Raw-05p-RSE-HF-1.jpg
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Apr 22, 2007, at 1:30 AM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/7MillionDollarHome/
I think this crumpler is very nice for walking (city etc)
but less usefull on a bike, and riding a bike is something
that is hard to avoid in the Netherlands :-)
The 7Mill is long and tall
Sounds like what the Lowepro CompuTrekker AW does very well. I used
one of those to transport Canon 10D plus five lenses, plus Panasonic
FZ10, plus all required remotes, power supplies, batteries, backup
storage devices, cards, tripod stuff, plus PowerBook laptop plus
tripod for two-three
The curious thing I discovered was that, with a filter in place, I
needed to remove it frequently to clean the lens and the backside of
the filter. Without a filter in place, cleaning my lenses is required
far less frequently and most of the time all that's required is a
quick puff with a
, do you still have one of those shots? It would be interesting
to see the effect of a filter on a real shot.
2007/4/22, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...When you notice how much filters cost in flare, it will be when
you
get image ghosts across the best evening photos you've ever
On Apr 22, 2007, at 4:02 AM, mike wilson wrote:
But... digital makes thing so easy! Everyone says so! It must be
true.
Only fools believe 'what some people say' without question.
I don't believe you are a fool. ;-)
I reconfigured my systems' directory structures after adopting
Spin up and spin down *are* the highest stress points of failure ...
I don't turn them on and off a lot for that reason. The external
Seagate drives I use have automatic shutdown and park as well as auto
startup when a drive request is made anyway, and do it efficiently
with reasonable
symmetrically free. Again, I am not trying to pass
judgment on your choice. It is just that I am kind of thinking out
loud.
Evidently I need to find a way to meet you in person ;-).
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
My big kit bag search has proven to be very successful.
...
Hope that this info
On Apr 22, 2007, at 1:44 AM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
I'm not entirely sure what you mean. I don't partition my drives ...
my startup drive is a single 500Gbyte volume.
Yes, I started out with 750, as delivered by Apple.
Perhaps I am too paranoid, but with a background in system maintenance
and
On Apr 22, 2007, at 11:49 AM, Cotty wrote:
Only one. LowePro Stealth AW
http://www.amazon.com/Lowepro-Stealth-AW-Backpack-ballistic/dp/
B6I5EE
or AW II
http://www.lowepro.com/Products/Backpacks/allWeather/
Stealth_AW_II.aspx
Highly recommended. Had one for years and can't fault
Very nice, looks like a great performer!
I've always been fascinated by these very long lenses, but every time
I've bought one I took about ten photos of the moon and distant
hillsides, then stuck them in a bag and didn't use them again. Then I
sold them a year later... I guess my photo
On Apr 23, 2007, at 6:54 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Since obtaining 2 (count 'em, 2) DSLRs, we've started generating a lot
of images. It's not uncommon for me to fill a 2GB card in 30 minutes
with photos of the girls playing in the backyard. Thus far, we've
been
keeping everything, but
On Apr 23, 2007, at 7:35 AM, William Robb wrote:
Everything I shoot is wonderful, so I don't have this problem
So far, I keep everything, but at some point, I'll have to start
deleting
the junk files off the hard drive. I'll do more or less the same
thing in
principle as I did
On Apr 23, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Anecdotal evidence based on experience doesn't mean squat. It's not
scientific. Greywolf is absolutely correct in his contention
LOL Of
course, over the years, in many areas, we've seen the scientific
evidence
means less than squat.
On Apr 23, 2007, at 8:36 AM, graywolf wrote:
You are an idiot, Bill.
.. So, Bill, you can not tell me nothing, I have been around 63
years and
have forgotten most of what I knew when I was 16, when I knew
everything. ...
Like the english language, I guess.
Another one for the nonexistence
BTW:
For those wanting to experiment with RAID, Mac OS X's Disk Utility
includes the ability to configure drives in RAID 0, RAID 1 or as
Concatenated RAID Set configuration. I'm no RAID expert, but it would
seem that a Power Mac G5 or a Mac Pro with multiple internal drives
would make for
The thing is, Jack, that a couple of bits of dust on the front
element of a lens does *nothing* to affect image quality in any
significant way. (Those same specs on the *rear* element can have an
impact, depending upon the lens.)
A fine layer of dust between the front element and the back
For those addicted to lens tests,
http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/#pentax
has now started testing Pentax lenses. Right now they've got only the
FA50/1.4 and DA18-55/3.5-5.6 up, but it looks like they're going to
do a fair sampling of the rest.
Disclaimer: I'm not a fan of these kinds
On Apr 23, 2007, at 9:40 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://en.epochtimes.com/news/7-2-4/51295.html
Hmm. Looks like my freezer.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks Doug.
G
On Apr 23, 2007, at 10:13 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
No, Tom. The general opinion here is that digital is different from
film.
graywolf wrote:
Ok, just for the hell of it. The general opinion here is that
digital is
better than film
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Dust is speck for me too.
Sounds to me like you're posing a greater risk to the glass surfaces
with all that cleaning, Jack.
I haven't needed to clean a lens more than a couple of times in the
past year at most. I give them a puff with a hand blower to get the
dust off if I see any, and I
After some discussion a while back regarding a small, light external
flash unit to trigger other flashes' by slave, Adam Maas mentioned
the Nikon SB-30.
I looked it up and it looked very nice: teensy, decent power for its
size, three manual power settings and four Auto settings, simple EV
On Apr 23, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
BTW, in my world dust cannot migrate to the area between the filter
and
the lens unless the filter is removed. :)
lol ... Do you have them sealed somehow? ;-)
I always thought that too, which is why I found the consistent build
up of
??
The M85/2 has excellent rendering properties. I only sold mine
because I wanted the shorter focal length and full functionality of
the shorter FA77.
The bokeh of any lens is very sensitive to what has been done to
render the image, not to the capture medium. Clumsy image processing
I was out for my Saturday morning walk in Guadalupe River Park, San
Jose, this time carrying camera and tripod. The San Jose Airport is
very nearby, I was right under the landing flight path for the main
strip, and the sensation of being in this park with the rose garden
and old orchards
On Apr 23, 2007, at 12:38 PM, graywolf wrote:
But I do not want to improve my photography.
Mark!
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Apr 23, 2007, at 12:14 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
So what does this do on the Pentax body, just straigh Manual flash
control, but will trigger your slave.
Yes, exactly. That's precisely what I wanted. It's the difference
between carting about a two pound lump the size of a paperback book
Nice shot. The title is a little corny.
Hasselblad has provided an in-viewfinder bubble level with the
SuperWide since the 1960s. Real time, very accurate, very useful... ;-)
Godfrey
On Apr 23, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Tom C wrote:
Thanks. It's possible there's a slight tilt...
Now there's a
Another from my walk in the park this past Saturday, adding to the
Tree collection I've been building:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/20a.htm
Comments, critique, and a wet blanket always appreciated. No flames
please: the trees get upset.
best,
Godfrey
--
PDML
On Apr 23, 2007, at 3:05 PM, John Francis wrote:
That looks like the sort of explanation Calvin's dad would provide :-)
I always liked Calvin's dad.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Apr 23, 2007, at 2:25 PM, Thibouille wrote:
Well if I wondered it is because I did not know ;) Never had any time
to play to see if medium had any influence. I do not usually state
things just because I think they are. Reason for me being ignorant.
On another POV: s**t, what did I start
Ann,
I love this photo. ;-)
The way I have my K10D set up, it works with exactly the same
responsiveness and fluidity, if not more, as my Nikon SLRs once did.
The only hitch is whether I leave it in AF-S or MF focus mode ... in
the latter it is *exactly* the same.
You're using a less
On Apr 23, 2007, at 3:32 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_beachbench.html
Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/Vivitar Series 1 vmc 35-85mm f2.8
varifocus.
For some reason, that reminds me of William Eggleston.
Take it as a compliment. ;-)
G
--
PDML
On Apr 23, 2007, at 5:36 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Well I just took the plunge and ordered myself a copy of Lightroom.
Now
we'll see how the learning curve goes...
I recommend very strongly that anyone who wants to understand how to
get a lot of work done with Lightroom with the shortest
On Apr 23, 2007, at 6:06 PM, AlexG wrote:
Pardon my ignorance?
Why do you say Photodo is misleading?
- Because I find the test results there inaccurate based upon my use
of lenses that they've tested.
- Because their graphs don't make much sense.
- Because people take their word as some kind
Sounds cool! I'm just about decided to sign up for the second stage
of the Professional Practice for Exhibiting Artists course I took
last year. It concentrates on learning how to promote and manage
artist-business relationships with galleries, publications, etc.
Fun stuff, eh? A course on
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Sclessin seen from the top of an old mine dump.
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/8689239
Very interesting. Almost three photos presented as one, and it works
beautifully.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
There's something quite subtle and humorous about this one, frank.
I also think it would render better as monochrome, but it's darn neat
as is.
The googlemap display worked well.
G
On Apr 24, 2007, at 6:57 AM, frank theriault wrote:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=lESYwdjzwI
On Apr 24, 2007, at 10:43 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
I've been trying remote control mode in the FN menu, I have AF in
remote mode
enabled in the custom menu, using FA lenses. Using the Pentax
remote or a
universal long range one I cannot get the camera to AF before
taking the
shot,
On Apr 23, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Taken from the S.Marco tower in Venice, looking down at the passers-
by in
S.Marco Square:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/misc/misc18e.htm
Apart from the obvious increased contrast and BW conversion, the
picture has
been flipped, rotated
On Apr 24, 2007, at 11:06 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
Dumb question, you do have the AF switched on don't you?
William Robb
Hi William
Yes switched on, but in C-AF (continuous), could that be causing
it? I'm away
from the camera right now.
Yes, that's the problem. The IR remote only
On Apr 24, 2007, at 2:04 PM, John Whittingham wrote:
Thanks for the reply. Just tested again, it works fine in AF-S but
no AF in
AF-C just shutter release, did you test AF-C Godfrey?
I did and reported in a later note. AF with the Remote is AF-S only.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Another from the upcoming Tree collection...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/20b.htm
Comments, critique and good fertilizer all welcomed.
best,
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Apr 24, 2007, at 9:41 PM, eric wrote:
Been looking at some wide angle lenses for my DL, and been noticing
that
while any truly wide angle lens is awfully expensive (yeah, I know,
photography is an expensive hobby), the ones with big apertures are
noticeably cheaper than those with small
On Apr 24, 2007, at 8:12 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/
photo#5057197184448144050
I think this one would work better in color, or with a much different
BW tonal rendering. They seem sort of flat, the background competes
for attention.
Godfrey
On Apr 24, 2007, at 9:59 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Pentax K10D, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 100, 1/180 sec @ f/8
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4734a.htm
Very graphic rendering, quite nice really. I like that you're pushing
some new stylistic boundaries in your work. :-)
I've seen book
On Apr 25, 2007, at 1:40 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Suprisingly, the Zenitar 16mm/f2.8 is one of the cheapest lenses
available and is also very good. You just need to be aware that
individual samples can vary in quality, so you need to buy one that
you can try first or go to a decent
RAW files always contain the same data. The bodies prior to the K10D
output PEF files which can be transformed to DNG with lossless
compression with Adobe's DNG Converter, which reduces size by
approximately 40%. The K10D will produce PEF files with lossless
compression or uncompressed DNG
Warm the roast beef, slice a soft but toasted crust ciabatta bread
roll, a touch of salt and pepper, a sprinkle of shredded swiss
cheese, maybe a touch of mayo... mmm, satori. ;-)
G
On Apr 25, 2007, at 5:31 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
OK gang, this may be one of the strangest questions asked
This isn't a camera list, is it? It's a culinary society with a
Pentax addiction.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
lol ... but we were talking about Pentax cameras, eh? ;-)
G
On Apr 25, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
There is one exception to this rule, the Canon 1D mkIII has an sRAW
mode
that provides a 2.5MP RAW file from a 10MP sensor.
RAW files always contain the same data. The bodies prior
A DNG file constructed this way is simply an encapsulated RGB data
file with lossless compression. It isn't a RAW file. You might as
well just save as a JPEG at maximum quality, or JPEG2000.
G
On Apr 25, 2007, at 8:15 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Dave, but what if you downsized the TIFF file
Looking at all three, they don't express to me that feeling of dark
with glistening wetness that I think it what you're trying for. They
just seem flat and dullish in appearance.
I like the composition though, so I bunged about in a heavy handed
way with curves adjustment tools and did some
On Apr 25, 2007, at 6:55 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
... The composition was initially appealing (I don't mind the
sloping porch)
but there's just too much else that's wrong with it. It'll
probably go
in the circular file sooner or later. Thanks again for looking, and
thanks for the
Then the answer is no, there isn't.
Or rather, what we got is about as good as you're going to get right
now. ;-)
A K10D RAW file, converted to losslessly compressed DNG format, is
going to be about a 9Mbyte file. If you have a good broadband
connection and the person wanting to post
On Apr 25, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Since I'm experimenting with some ideas in Photoshop today, I hope
you don't mind a bit of mashing about on your photo too. A crop, some
delicate rendering of tonal scale, addition of both noise and blur,
punching
I'm glad that gives you some ideas.
I'm happy to send you the Photoshop CS2 file with all layers intact
of what I did, if you want to see what and how I worked on it. It's
about a 2Mbyte file in .zip format if you'd like it.
:-)
Godfrey
On Apr 25, 2007, at 12:44 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
I carry a camera all the time ... either of the Pentax bodies, the
Fuji F30 or the Treo 650. There are many photos in my library that
would never have happened if I didn't.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Apr 25, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Steve Bullock wrote:
I can't get my K10D (FW1.10) to use pre-fire if I use the remote
control.
The manual (p84) implies the remote should work with the 2s timer
but it
doesn't for me.
For the IR remote, set the selection to the Fn menu-drive mode
choices
Same day as the tree, I was walking along and all of the sudden my
camera started to slide away from my body. I had to grab it and hold
on while it was attracted to the flower. The only way I could break
away from the pull was to press the shutter release grin.
Pentax K10D, A 70-210/4,
I believe this problem is not confined to Italy...
G
On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:30 AM, Bob W wrote:
p.s. how did you find a virgin in Italy?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Good to hear it. Forza! :-)
G
On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:56 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Hay gang.:-)
Just found out, that the two big shows i lost to that company last
year, with arms of shooters and imacs, i now have back.
I knew a while back i might get them but Liz just called and its
Dave,
I like the rock.
What does the subject line ... Peso LV7 ... mean?
Godfrey
On Apr 26, 2007, at 10:15 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5890772
One more from the carving series. This was taken at the same rock as
the + and animal figures, but at
On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:59 AM, drew wrote:
http://www.rileyelf.free-online.co.uk/peso3/
Quite nice in general. Nice color, lines, composition, etc.
I think the foreground's sparse coverage could have been better and,
overall, it seems a little less sharp than I'd prefer.
Godfrey
--
PDML
On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:17 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
What does the subject line ... Peso LV7 ... mean?
Short for Las Vegas 1 through 7(so far)
Ah, thanks. I knew it has to be something obvious I was missing. ;-)
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I won't be at GFM, but I thought I'd toss this in...
Bring a 5 liter pack of Kodak XTOL, mix it there to stock
concentration. For processing mix it at 1:1 dilution and process one-
shot. It takes 500 ml of developer to process two rolls of 120 film,
each pair of 120 rolls consumes 250 ml of
On Apr 27, 2007, at 2:08 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I won't be at GFM, but...
What's yer phone number? We'll call you.
LOL ... I turn my phone off when I don't want to receive calls. ;-)
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Apr 27, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I couldn't find a Mac version. Is it not available. That would be
very bizarre, considering how many graphics professionals use a Mac
platform.
I saw that too. Presumably they were done with the Windows version
and wanted to get it out for
On Apr 27, 2007, at 8:11 PM, William Robb wrote:
I saw that too. Presumably they were done with the Windows version
and wanted to get it out for business reasons, but it's always a pain
when companies don't do simultaneous releases.
At least for once you don't get to gloat about your
On Apr 27, 2007, at 8:24 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
As I expected, the M85/2 stands up very well compared to the much
newer, and
much more expensive glass.
The DA70/2.4 seems to exhibit the least smooth bokeh, I definitely
wouldn't call the 85/2 bokeh bad in that series.
The DA70
On Apr 28, 2007, at 10:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With my old monitor, I just spray it with Windex. The surface of a
LCD
screen appears much more fragile and mine now has spots (I
confess, I sometimes
eat at the computer).
Any suggestions?
I use a microfiber cloth. Just make
On Apr 28, 2007, at 12:08 AM, Cotty wrote:
I couldn't find a Mac version. Is it not available. That would be
very bizarre, considering how many graphics professionals use a Mac
platform.
To me, it reinforces the view that Pentax has no intention of assuming
any appeal within the photo
This is the one I use:
BELKIN HI-SPEED USB 2.0 7-PORT HUB - F5U237V1
http://www.compuplus.com/i-Belkin-Hi-Speed-USB-20-7-Port-Hub-
F5U237V1-1009184~.html?sid=3cqlm3fld06kb2s
or
http://tinyurl.com/2fhw82
$28. Very reliable, very fast, and the design allows stacking two of
them in the same
Was in San Francisco early this morning, climbed the hill to Twin
Peaks and captured this view ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/21.htm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I agree. I'd rather see them get them right before releasing them.
Both Canon and Nikon have had problems with top end lenses delivered
on too short a development schedule.
Godfrey
On Apr 28, 2007, at 3:47 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I find that reassuring. Pentax is cautious. That's a good
Nice.
This is an old technique and still works well. I made this photo
posted in my PAW 2002 set about 25 years ago using it ... although I
used vaseline rather than butter...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW2/02.htm
Godfrey
Jens Bladt wrote:
I just had to try the old David
LOL!!!
G
On Apr 29, 2007, at 1:42 AM, Bob W wrote:
Your pecker looks a little soft, Paul, but the angle is about right.
Paul Stenquist
Shot a male downey woodpecker at the nature center today. I also made
a very good deal with the same facility to sell and exhibit my
photos. Sort of a
On Apr 29, 2007, at 12:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like fake shallow DOF. Opening up the f-stop would seem
to be a lot
easier and a lot less messy. I guess I just don't get it.
A good soft-focus filter, the vaseline technique, a soft focus
specialized lens ... they're all
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/21.htm
Thanks for all the compliments and comments ... Some responses to
individual questions.
From: Joe Barnhart
... I see the shot was 1/20 sec with your DA70 -- tripod? I've
considered getting something like a combo walking stick/monopod
My alternative better bounce card is a very large, white plastic
pill bottle that sits over the K10D and *ist DS flash head. Cost:
zero. Effectiveness: pretty ok if you want something like this.
It's kinda like having a soft bare-bulb flash on top of the camera.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Remember that the K10D's 1.10 update incited second curtain sync and
possibly wireless remote flash issues.
I have v1.20 installed now. Some folks on DPReview have reported
reduced noise with it.
Godfrey
On Apr 29, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Bob Rapp wrote:
Hi Andre,
You can go the Pentax.de
It's reasonable to consider reproduction ratios in approximately the
1:4 to 2:1 range as macro despite more specific definitions for
photomacography and microphotography.
Most lenses marked as Macro achieve 1:4 to 1:2 magnification ratio
without additional equipment. Some go to 1:1. For
On Apr 29, 2007, at 9:11 PM, Bob Rapp wrote:
Anything new with regards to exposure errors when using K and M
lenses in
manual using the green button?
That's a good question. I might repeat the test I did some time ago.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Very dramatic presentation from the angle and tonal processing. I'm
not altogether certain that the subject warrants that much drama, but
it's a good job technically.
Godfrey
On Apr 29, 2007, at 9:25 PM, Mark Erickson wrote:
Got a little time to play today, so I went down to Sacred Heart
Since I've never seen any of the noise problem with my K10D .. and
evaluating grossly underexposed and misprocessed exposures intended
to exaggerate noise seems to me a total waste of time ... I cannot
judge what the v1.20 update does in this regard myself.
Godfrey
On Apr 29, 2007, at
My tests showed the K10D has an increasing tendency to overexpose in
the 'Manual/green button stop-down metering' mode as the metering
operated with the lens opening moving away from wide open. However,
the metering error is predictable and can be adjusted for.
Furthermore, you can use the
On Apr 29, 2007, at 9:57 PM, Maris V. Lidaka Sr. wrote:
I've now transferred my CDs to 2 external hard drives for storage and
backup and it's time to organize them.
I have PS Album 1 now. Your thoughts: upgrade to Album 2.0, use
Photoshop
CS2's Bridge, or buy Adobe Lightroom? My
On 29/4/07, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've been in the office all afternoon doing some editing and more
textures photos, and got to fooling around, coming up with this:
http://www.alphoto.com/images/selfport.jpg
kind of odd.
and so is the photo.
I like it, Doug. The photo
On Apr 30, 2007, at 8:28 AM, frank theriault wrote:
A local headshop:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=r5DHpi2sc6
;-)
That is funny.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I never liked microprism focusing aids very much. The Pentax
Spotmatic had a good viewfinder, regardless, although not quite as
good as the Nikon F I bought in 1969, which had a type A screen as
standard (plain matte fresnel with central split-image) and replaced
it with an E screen almost
Bruce,
I don't have much to offer regards Lightroom vs Capture One as I've
never been a C1 user nor do I plan to try it out, but I found your
comments on LR interesting.
Re: the organizational layout that Lightroom uses ... I find it
works well, I don't know that it imposes anything
On Apr 30, 2007, at 9:06 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=jGGBdePISt
Frank, what's this gmapuploader thing? I get a blank page even if I
switch JavaScript on.
Juan told us about it a week or so back:
On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:52 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:
I think
Glad to be of help.
From that description, it seems like exporting your finished work to
a 'completed' directory tree as I do and then letting ExpressDigital
Darkroom do its thing with that could work well, complementing the
original exposure import and editing workflow.
I find it
http://www.thesun.co.uk/section/0,,1,00.html
What is it about The Fertilizer Five that distresses you so?
G
On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Would someone in the UK kindly ring the Sun and tell them to update
the page3 photos? They've had the same one on their home page
On Apr 30, 2007, at 12:21 PM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
I found three things improved performance substantially
on Mac OS X/Power Mac G5:
- turn off automatic XMP updates
- pre-build standard and 1:1 previews
- turn off the automatic deletion of previews
I have those setting now too.
At one
... Bridge and Camera Raw 2.7 will read and interpret the
metadata ...
Error correction: Camera Raw 3.7 if you're following this thread. No
such thing as Camera Raw 2.7. ;-)
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
with regards to exposure errors when using K and M
lenses in
manual using the green button?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: Firmware 1.10
Remember
901 - 1000 of 17479 matches
Mail list logo
