Fortunately for me, most of what I shoot can be captured in the 40mm-55mm range
(in 35mm camera terms).
There are a lot of reasons to use an RF for street photography, including
smaller size, quieter shutter, no shutter lag, and quick manual focusing on a
spot that you want to be in focus.
As
Good choice. I never even bother to turn on my Dell.
Jeffery
On Dec 24, 2010, at 10:34 AM, Bill Owens wrote:
Both our PC's died over the past month or so. We bit the bullet and
bought a Macbook as a family Christmas present. It wouldn't connect
to the 7 year old router so Time Warner had
And if one likes to shoot BW film with a red or yellow filter, you aren't
looking through a red or yellow viewfinder.
Jeffery
On Dec 24, 2010, at 12:29 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Collin Brendemuehl
coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
My all-time favorite classic
The 20/1.7 on the Panasonic is a wonderful combination for street if you have
the electronic viewfinder.
Jeffery
On Dec 24, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
BTW, Godfrey, I also have the ZD 50mm f/2 Macro on my E-P1. It's a
wonderful lens. With the Lumix 20 1.7, it makes a nice
I'm 60.
Go Beatles!
Jeffery
On Dec 28, 2010, at 8:42 PM, Tanya Love wrote:
So, it occurred to me after all these years on the list, that I may actually
not be the baby of the list anymore! How sad is that?! I am getting old!
So, just out of interest, was wondering if you guys would
I was wondering why it wasn't called the HPDML (Honeywell Pentax).
Jeffery
On Dec 28, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Peter Loveday wrote:
With the average age of PDMLers so far, we're already a valuable
archaeological treasure.
- Peter
-Original Message- From: Subash
Sent: Wednesday,
Not just a Dell...a Dell with Windows Vista on it. Ga!
Jeffery
On Dec 29, 2010, at 6:01 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Well now, that's your problem. You bought a DellI
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
I like it!
Jeffery
On Jan 5, 2011, at 7:47 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
A friend who is also a retired Navy Photographer like I am gave me a
camera kit today.
Wonder how it will work?
Walt
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Portfolio/Some-Favorites/4592986_mrB5J#1148126802_Tnz5Q-XL-LB
--
Hey Chris, sorry to have missed the originals. The K10 will serve you well for
the time being! I got my first Pentax in 1969, and have never been disappointed
with one. I'm ashamed to say that we have no cormorants down here, and I
couldn't photograph one even if we did (BP Oil won't let
Ah, I remember lusting after that camera in about 1970. One of my earlier
concerns with the Spotmatic I was using was that shutter speeds were in
1-f-stop detentes, and I was using Kodachrome (with not much latitude). The
mere idea of a stepless shutter that could give you 1/243 of a second
- it's step less.
Regards
Jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On Jan 23, 2011 17:14 Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Ah, I remember lusting after that camera in about 1970. One of my
earlier concerns with the Spotmatic I was using was that shutter
It's kind if strange, but I don't mind it. It might be a little distracting
because it's unique-looking. But I don't find it busy looking like some
bokeh. Looks a bit artsy.
Jeffery
On Jan 23, 2011, at 10:41 PM, Sasha Sobol wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/5382974835/
Tell me
, 2011, at 11:19 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
It's kind if strange, but I don't mind it. It might be a little distracting
because it's unique-looking. But I don't find it busy looking like some
bokeh. Looks a bit artsy.
Jeffery
On Jan 23, 2011, at 10:41 PM, Sasha Sobol wrote:
http
I just got switched from ATT to Cox Internet service. They gave me a non-WiFi
modem, so I tried to connect it up with one of my three previous Wi-Fi routers
(Belkin, Apple, Cisco), and could get all three of the WiFi routers to work but
not one of them will attach me to the Internet (through
-26 12:33 , Jeffery Smith wrote:
I just got switched from ATT to Cox Internet service. They gave me a
non-WiFi modem, so I tried to connect it up with one of my three previous
Wi-Fi routers (Belkin, Apple, Cisco), and could get all three of the WiFi
routers to work but not one of them
have
done the router re-set.
stan
On Jan 26, 2011, at 3:33 PM, steve harley wrote:
On 2011-01-26 12:33 , Jeffery Smith wrote:
I just got switched from ATT to Cox Internet service. They gave me a
non-WiFi modem, so I tried to connect it up with one of my three previous
Wi-Fi routers
It's autumn! No more sweltering heat! I feel like doing what they are doing
(but don't want to throw my back out).
Jeffery
On Oct 6, 2010, at 11:27 AM, P N Stenquist wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11755272size=lg
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11755273
Ah, a living fossil, looking pretty much the same as they did 300 million years
ago. Nice catch. I like the stony background.
Jeffery
On Oct 7, 2010, at 8:56 AM, frank theriault wrote:
I've wanted to catch one of these fellows for a while now. Sadly, I
was unprepared, having only a
My opinion is to make sure photos don't look like they were posed (as you see
on the society page), and to be unobtrusive when possible. Blend in without
drawing attention to yourself when possible.
Jeffery
On Oct 7, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
I've just received my
This one did some SERIOUS posing.
http://tinyurl.com/2fef2fz
Jeffery
On Oct 7, 2010, at 11:51 AM, John wrote:
frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I've wanted to catch one of these fellows for a while now.
Dragonflies will pose for you. Really. Just get close to their
be going on that I don't have the reach for.
-- Walt
On 10/7/2010 11:38 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
My opinion is to make sure photos don't look like they were posed (as you
see on the society page), and to be unobtrusive when possible. Blend in
without drawing attention to yourself when possible
With memory cards as cheap as they are, I don't shoot in anything but RAW. I
never need a string of closely-timed images, so RAW is normal for me. Unless it
is overcast, I won't even think about shooting at midday. I know, it's sort of
a lazy attitude, but dawn and dusk are so much better for
Are you kidding? It's obviously even greater than the self-preservation urge. I
think my wife won't notice that the camera I'm carrying says K10 on it instead
of the usual K100, but within minutes she busts me. And K5 looks a lot
different from K7. I'm a dead man.
Jeffery
On Oct 10, 2010, at
Yeah, I didn't think I was being sexist with my statements. The fact is that,
when people are married, their money is THEIR money, not his money. My wife has
no interest whatsoever in photography, and when I acquire a piece of equipment,
she understands that it is just my hobby.
Jeffery
On
I assume that's to cover the cost for a person handing it to you. Still, it
seems silly.
On Oct 12, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
Well, at least it seems weird to me. Just discovered that KEH charges $4.95
for the privilege of picking up an order at the warehouse. I knew I'd be
Something with as few frills and choices as possible. And megapixels are
insignificant since I doubt that any of them will be making 11x14 prints.
My mother is a senior citizen (89), and I cannot imagine a camera simple enough
for her to use. Next time you're at the store, take note of any
I keep thinking about which model, but there are so many factors. I find that
the modern TINY point and shoot camera are fumbly and hard to hold. You might
ultimately want to go over what all digitals seem to have as features (as in
fully automatic mode), and then tell them to go to WalMart,
I always use a card reader. So far, I haven't had any damage to the contacts
(at least none that I'm aware of).
Jeffery
On Oct 15, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
Hi,
I always transfer pictures to my PC using its card reader. I can't remember
why
I decided to do it this way,
I had a chance to use this lens for the first time today. The conditions were
not good (high noon, blinding sunlight, not a cloud in the sky, low humidity).
It sure is easier to carry around compared to the tank-like Tokina 28-75 f/2.8.
I'll try to post something tomorrow (something shot in
It is definitely a bug (which is a subgroup of insects). Belongs to a group
called the Heteroptera. It's hard to tell with all of the camouflage on it.
This group is nearly all plant suckers (they have piercing mouthparts like a
mosquito only bigger). A small group (assassin bugs and bedbugs)
I meant to mention that it may be a squash bug.
They have leafy-looking legs.
Jeffery
On Oct 16, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
I saw this guy walking across my kitchen counter... scooped him up and
dropped him on a table outside on the patio and took a few shots. What the
old enough to remember the Vivitar ads that touted that their
lenses were DESIGNED USING A COMPUTER.
Jeffery
On Oct 16, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Oct 16, 2010, at 19:18, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I had a chance to use this lens for the first time today. The conditions
were
My one roll of XP2 shot in broad daylight at noon on a cloudless day was the
biggest disaster of my photographic life. I respect XP2 as a great film with a
lot of latitude under low contrast (shady or overcast) conditions, but truly
awful in high contrast conditions...blown highlights and dense
://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Jeffery Smith
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 8:48 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Tamron 28-75 f/2.8
And I should have mentioned nice contrast
-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Jeffery Smith
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 9:43 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Tamron 28-75 f/2.8
I don't doubt that. I just never saw it touted publically until Vivitar ads.
The mindset in the early 1970's
Assassin bugs are native to South America. Charles Darwin allowed one to bite
him (their piercing mouthparts are able to numb the tissues, so you don't feel
it). They live in thatched roofs of huts.
There is speculation that Darwin's poor health throughout his adult life was
due to Chagas
of results I would
be a happy camper. The fact that it is 1/3 of the price of a Zeiss and lighter
in weight is a win-win-win.
Jeffery
On Oct 17, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Miserere wrote:
On 16 October 2010 20:18, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
I had a chance to use this lens for the first
http://400tx.blogspot.com/2010/10/tamron-sp-af-28-75-f28-macro-zoom-lens.html
N.B., the lens was mounted on a full frame Sony 850, not a Pentax K.
Jeffery
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
:36 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Good examples.
The problem i had with my two, on the K10D,, was from f4 to f 2.8.
Terrible focus. From f5.6 up it was stellar
DAVE
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
http://400tx.blogspot.com/2010/10/tamron-sp-af-28-75
Thanks for the link. It does seem to have a loyal following.
Jeffery
On Oct 17, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Miserere wrote:
On 16 October 2010 20:18, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
I had a chance to use this lens for the first time today. The conditions
were not good (high noon, blinding
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/131401-REG/General_Brand_Right_Angle_Bracket_with.html
Cheeep!
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/116630-REG/Hama_HA_6831.html
More like it.
Jeffery
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
I missed the part about the swively thing on my earlier post. BH has all sort
of brackets (flash brackets) with the capacity to aim the flash all over the
place, but they are so darned expensive, I could never justify the cost. I
always used a Kalt bracket (this is 35 years ago, for about $9),
One of the early Panasonic digitals had a folding rear hood for the LCD. Helped
a little outdoors.
Jeffery
On Oct 20, 2010, at 5:37 PM, eckinator wrote:
I've seen folding shields for the rear display but none acting as a
refconverter at the same time so they're fine looking down but useless
HNCD! I look forward to your comments as you start using it regularly.
Jeffery
On Oct 21, 2010, at 1:36 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I pulled the trigger and bought a new camera today. Sorry, it isn't a Pentax.
I usually don't buy anything new right out of the gate. Particularly
pro-class
Remind me, what the Sunni 16 rule?
On Oct 21, 2010, at 11:26 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
So we can take that Allah way to the Bank?
On 10/21/2010 10:48 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Oh no. I'm not going down the Islamic puns road.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Ken
Happy New Camera Day. It is used more often in guitar forums (HNGD), where the
obsession to buy new axes is far worse than camera junkies.
Jeffery
On Oct 21, 2010, at 1:11 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
HNCD? Happy New Camera, Dude?
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jeffery Smith jsmith
I'll go out on a limb and speculate that Godfrey's hands fit an E-5 better than
a K-5. Godfrey is a BIG GUY! One of the big selling points of the Pentax K
system is size...small, high quality prime lenses, and small bodies. Olympus is
just too chunky for me to carry it around for hours.
I keep mine on a @istD,and the smallness of the two is great. I don't even try
to manual focus it.
Jeffery
On Oct 21, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Nick David Wright wrote:
So I've been looking at getting an M 40mm f/2.8 pancake. But I've been
looking at pictures and that focus ring looks terribly tiny.
The autofocus is quick and accurate. I use it outdoors (usually around 4-5.6),
so the DOF and autofocus make manual focusing and hyperfocal moot, at least to
me. To me, its tiny size is its biggest selling point. The only thing I don't
really like is the screw-in lens cap, but I don't mind the
Oops, I thought we were talking about the autofocus model. I didn't realize
they had one from the more distant past.
Jeffery
On Oct 21, 2010, at 7:07 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I admit I'm confused. This lens is not that wide so that focus is
irrelevant. The short answer is that your
Got it. My bad.
Jeffery
On Oct 21, 2010, at 7:14 PM, Nick David Wright wrote:
Jeff, were talking about an M-class manual focus lens. Not the current
DA version.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
The autofocus is quick and accurate. I use it outdoors
After shooting indoors with Fuji 800 for years and living with the grain,
Godfrey's photo looks spectacular at ISO 3200. For me, improvements in
resolution and noise reduction on digital in the past 6 years have been very
impressive.
Jeffery
On Oct 22, 2010, at 8:43 AM, P N Stenquist wrote:
Well, with that one, I'm out of here. It's been fun, guys, until now.
Jeffery
On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:21 AM, William Robb wrote:
Hey good one liner from the pompous twit faggot.
Too bad it is, apparently, not true.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
As naive as it may sound, I bought my Olympus E-1 (my first dSLR) based on its
(1) sturdiness [read: not a plastic body], and (2) LACK of a pop-up flash. I
had a pz1p fpr a while, and found the pop-up flash to be annoying when I was
just trying to grab a shot in lower light conditions and
I do a significant amount of shooting theater productions, and the shutter lag
is a major issue for me, as is sensitivity/dynamic range. The E-5 is
significantly improved here, or is it simply not a problem with the E-5?
The K-x has not been an issue with dynamic range/sensitivity for me, and
.
-Adam
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
I do a significant amount of shooting theater productions, and the shutter
lag is a major issue for me, as is sensitivity/dynamic range. The E-5 is
significantly improved here, or is it simply
As Yogi Berra once said, If Godfrey doesn't want to talk about equipment, you
can't stop him.
As for Godfrey being pompous, if you had met him in person, you wouldn't feel
that way. Very often the printed word on a forum makes a person appear
completely different than their actual demeanor. I
-x for
theatre productions given the ambient conditions.
One combination I have not considered is the Panasonic Lumix with Zuiko 50mm
macro. I'll probably toss it in the bag as well.
Jeffery
On Oct 23, 2010, at 2:02 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
From: Jeffery Smith
Sent: Saturday, October 23
.
Is the Katzeye relatively easy to install on the Pentax? I've never had an
issue with screen swapping on Rolleiflexes, but they are big and easy to fool
with.
Jeffery
On Oct 23, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 23, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I do a significant
...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Jeffery Smith
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 3:38 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT: new camera
Hey Larry,
I have to admit that I really avoid manual focusing of late because of the
lack of a split prism/split
Did you induce the vignetting effect? It's pretty pronounced here.
Jeffery L. Smith
New Orleans, LA
On Oct 23, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
A photo from this morning's walk and breakfast with friends.
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1205/5107798395_a5cc7e2b64_o.jpg
If It
I may look at this sort of thing about 100 times first.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqZCjT-jr1s
On Oct 23, 2010, at 4:02 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 23, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Is the Katzeye relatively easy to install on the Pentax? I've never had an
issue
Ever since I was in high school, I secretly knew I preferred Pentax. I
attempted to deny it by using a Mamiya 500TL, and I even tried Nikons for a
couple of years, but it just didn't work out.
Jeffery
On Oct 23, 2010, at 6:51 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Alright, I admit it. I've also
It's easy to get angry on forums, but some posts go beyond anger. I've lost my
cool on forums before, and regretted it. I've apologized both onlist and
offlist (simultaneously) when I've overstepped civility. It's a win-win
resolution. Apologies were always accepted.
It doesn't hurt, and it
It's the easiest way to test autofocus. The real question is why they choose to
post those photos.
Jeffery
On Oct 23, 2010, at 9:10 PM, Nick David Wright wrote:
shoot pictures of their own feet?
http://blog.nickdavidwright.net/2010/10/feet.html
--
~Nick David Wright
I always thought that E-Volt was an unfortunate name (like the Datavue Spark
computer).
On Oct 24, 2010, at 8:31 AM, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Smoke starts to come out from under the flash.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
You mentioned a while back that you had rented some lenses. In the context of
this thread, that must fall under escort services.
Jeffery
On Oct 24, 2010, at 9:25 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
LOL! What a great thread!
Yes, the doors are thrown open, I'm out of the closet: I've owned and
Boorish is putting it mildly. It DOES fall under hate crime (which includes
insults and verbal abuse). I think hate crime is a clear line that we don't
traverse on this list. Pompous gas bag is not a hate crime. Faggot is. I would
prefer the way William F. Buckley introduced Norman Mailer
Tell these guys:
http://www.400tx.com/files/PAW2007/2007-20.html
Same guys every single year on Mardi Gras. Their mentor, the Rev. Grant Storms,
is no longer allowed in the French Quarter.
Jeffery
On Oct 24, 2010, at 2:33 PM, DagT wrote:
I never understood all the fuss about homosexuality.
I have a Pentax MZ-S, and it has never had a single frame shot with it. I
bought it around the time I suspected that it would be Pentax's last film body
(I have a wealth of Pentax lenses, from 20mm to 300mm). I received it, unboxed
it, put a 50/1.4 on the front of it, and promptly got clobbered
on
their side anymore. I´m just hope people are not hating religious people in
general because of people like him.
DagT
Den 24. okt. 2010 kl. 21.40 skrev Jeffery Smith:
Tell these guys:
http://www.400tx.com/files/PAW2007/2007-20.html
Same guys every single year on Mardi Gras. Their mentor
Still, I prefer him over today's far right. But, yes, he was breathtakingly
full of himself.
Jeffert
On Oct 24, 2010, at 7:01 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
OTOH, Buckley had his own moments of pompous gas baggery and boorishness. No
actual civility from either side here.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
I'm pressed with the sharpness of both images.
Jeffery
On Oct 24, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
I went to a local political event yesterday to take photos for one of the
groups that organized it (wound up getting my first photo credit in a local
newspaper, BTW), and
On Oct 24, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Sandy Harris wrote:
However, it is obviously not a hate crime.
Really? Does one have to use that word while committing an armed robbery or
punching the recipient?
Gay bashing has become a very hot button issue in the US, particularly in the
past month, as has
You're off the hook. God isn't convinced of your existence.
Jeffery
On Oct 24, 2010, at 7:52 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
As an agnostic, I have to admit it seems only fair to hold co-irreligionists
responsible for the crimes of Mao, Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot, Castro, Ceausescu,
etc.
--
, it
doesn't seem sharp with a wide-open aperture at any focal length. Stop it
down, though, and it's pretty nice for a sub-$200 lens.
Thanks again,
Walt
On 10/24/2010 7:44 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I'm pressed with the sharpness of both images.
Jeffery
On Oct 24, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Walter
discipline, I think, as well as it being such a
pleasure to use.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Jeffery Smith
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 6:41 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject
, stupid, arrogant, obnoxious, self destructive, insulting,
you name it isn't a crime. Save calling things crimes that actually are.
On 10/24/2010 3:36 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Boorish is putting it mildly. It DOES fall under hate crime (which
includes insults and verbal abuse). I think hate
No longer have the camera, but it was a Brownie Starmite (1962). Back then,
developing a roll of BW film (12ex) cost $.50.
Jeffery
On Oct 25, 2010, at 8:28 AM, George Sinos wrote:
Today's Topic -your first camera. How did you get started?
http://georges.posterous.com/first-camera
-GS-
My first SERIOUS camera was a Mamiya 500TL. A year later, I got a Pentax
Spotmatic (1969). Both cameras gave me what I thought were mediocre results.
Until I discovered that the weakest link in my system was a cheap Durst
enlarging lens. I switched to a Schneider Componon and the quality of the
For submissions to the PUG gallery, is color the norm or is BW equally
acceptable as long as it follows the theme for that month?
Jeffery
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
--- On Mon, 10/25/10, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
For submissions to the PUG gallery,
is color the norm or is BW equally acceptable as long
as it follows the theme for that month?
Jeffery
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
Which is one of the reasons why I find digital a bit less satisfying than
film. The impulse to spray and pray, blasting 400 images a day and trying
to find a few acceptable ones. I used to spend much more time planning
This mark the end of the entire incident, and everyone is ready to move on to
the subject of Pentax and photography!
Having Doug trim the thread from the archives before posting them would be good
too.
Jeffery
On Oct 25, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
That's a very good thing
I meant to say move on, for the first time, to Pentax and photography!
On Oct 25, 2010, at 11:50 AM, frank theriault wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
This mark the end of the entire incident, and everyone is ready to move
Gallery, OTOH is sponsored by Pentax; one applies to be one
of their artists; then one submits photos for judging by voting, and only
the survivors appear.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 10/25/10, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
From: Jeffery Smith jsmith
I am I the only person who immediately thought of Thomas Kinkade when seeing
those landscapes?
To refresh your memory:
http://tinyurl.com/6nti
Jeffery
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
The images are good enough that Nikon should give him a new 400/2.8 for the
good publicity.
Jeffery
On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:40 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
Fun reading.
Warning: Camera destruction. Not Pentax though.
http://markjrebilas.com/blog/?p=10225
-Charles
--
Charles
Did he decide to go with Adorama instead?
Jeffery
On Oct 25, 2010, at 7:30 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh sure, things get nasty and you go after the pigheaded whackjobs.
Whackjobs are people too, you know. And the
Good idea. That's why I avoid FoxNews and MSNBC altogether these days.
Jeffery
On Oct 26, 2010, at 7:56 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thank you, Boris!
After my little outburst on the WTF? was OT: New Camera thread, I'm going
to avoid politics and religion as much as I possibly can on the
Congrats! You can now add Pentax Artist to your resume'.
Jeffery
On Oct 26, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all!
Just wanted to strut a little as I've discovered that my first submission to
the Pentax Gallery was accepted!
As I recall, it is for 26 issues a year.
Jeffery
On Oct 26, 2010, at 7:08 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
It looks interesting but $175 a year is a little more then I planned
on. Next time I go to BN I'll look for a copy to peruse.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:37 PM, John Coyle
Nice bokeh and clear focus.
Jeffery
On Oct 27, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
http://s857.photobucket.com/albums/ab138/drd1135/PDML/?action=viewcurrent=butterfly1.jpg
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Well, he really nailed me. Disturbingly accurate.
Jeffery
On Oct 27, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Amusing post from Gordon Lewis:
http://shutterfinger.typepad.com/shutterfinger/2010/10/what-your-choice-of-camera-says-about-you.html
(Lewis, by the way, uses Pentax.oh, yes,
You need to switch genres to street photography, with images of people taking
the bus and walking.
Jeffery
On Oct 28, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
Normally, I'm much better about replying in a timely manner to responses to
the threads I start on the list than I was
Pretty hard to use a cell phone with no cell phone microwave towers. Damn!
Jeffery
On Oct 28, 2010, at 8:27 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/10/28/charlie.chaplin.circus.time.travel/index.html?hpt=C2
Dan
http://tinyurl.com/matyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
wrote:
Those would be located in the satellite they brought with them . . .
Dan
http://tinyurl.com/matyola
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
Pretty hard to use a cell phone with no cell phone
G! What happens in 2.5 hours?
Jeffery
On Oct 30, 2010, at 8:28 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Two and a half hours to go.
I need a drink
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
That's better than his daughter's wetting.
Jeffery
On Oct 30, 2010, at 8:59 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
He's shooting his daughters wedding, or weeding as I believe he put it, (this
is Dave Brooks after all),.
On 10/30/2010 9:51 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
G! What happens in 2.5 hours
The dude on the left is hung like a field mouse.
Jeffery
On Oct 30, 2010, at 6:00 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
You should definitely keep the lens. I particularly like the one of
the guy being kicked in the crotch:
http://www.web-options.com/V75/content/L168_large.html
On Sat, Oct
101 - 200 of 505 matches
Mail list logo
