As I mentioned in an earlier post, my color printing setup is simple on
my Mac. I simply place all my images in generic RGB colorspace and
print on an Epson 2200 using the Mac's Colorsynch workflow setting and
the Epson paper profiles. I know nothing of PC color printing problems,
so I can't sa
Good job of lighting the web. And you're right, that's one pretty
spider. Quite the looker. Thanks for sharing.
Paul
On Sep 12, 2005, at 7:20 PM, Don Sanderson wrote:
Playing with the af360fgz in wireless mode and the Sigma
90/2.8 Macro (MF) I plan to sell, I caught this little fella
just befor
Terminology. Some might say magnification of 1:1 or more is a "macro,"
but I've seen 1:2 shots labeled macro as well. Of course the term
"close-up" has even been used to describe a portrait configuration.
It's all quite imprecise.
On Sep 13, 2005, at 1:44 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
.. between a
I too see these pageant pics as more the recording of an event than
artistic photography. Your first effort is much better, although as I
said, I found the texture unpleasant. I think the concept is sound.
Perhaps a different texture would be more effective and pleasing.
Paul
On Sep 14, 2005, a
Good grab. Nice and sharp, great color. But I would probably crop out
some of the blank sky if it was mine. Perhaps that's too expected, but
I'm moved in that direction.
Paul
On Sep 14, 2005, at 6:46 PM, John Forbes wrote:
Great shot, Cotters. I'm not sure the composition matters too much.
I
Luminance smoothing can help smooth out the grainy look you get in
shadow areas of high ISO images or generally underexposed high ISO
images. There seems to be a price in detail, but I've used it on
portraits and the like quite effectively. Color noise reduction can
reduce the muliti-colored mo
I don't see brightness or shadow in your workflow. You should set
shadow to eliminate low end clipping or to extend shadows as required
right after setting exposure. You should set brightness next to correct
any problems in the midtones that may have developed if you had to
change exposure to p
I agree t hat most extended warranties are a ripoff, but the Apple Care
extended warranty is very good. I've saved the cost of the warranties
on my family's three Macs many times over. I had a mother board
replaced on one laptop and a hard drive on another. Both would have
been out of warranty
Without having a chance to play with it, I'd say the conversion is
pretty darn close. The brightest highlights have tonal value, so
they're not clipped. I might have tried to increase the brightness a
little bit to bring ore life to the darker parts of the car in the
center foreground. But as I
Shel uses a PC. On my Mac Cinema Display, running at 1.8, it looks a
little dark in the shaded yellow areas.
Paul
On Sep 17, 2005, at 10:30 AM, graywolf wrote:
A bit dark, did it on a Mac? If I increase my screen brightness to
about 1.8 gamma it looks good.
Anybody interested in hearing what
Last night saw another gallery crawl in Birmingham, Michigan. The
gallery that has been showing some of my work was on the tour, so they
asked me to come in and do some meet and greet. A jazz band parked out
in front, and we had a good turnout. Lots of fun. I posted some pics
for the owners, bu
Nice shot, Mark. I love the way the light plays off the roofs of the
houses in the foreground. Well composed.
Paul
--- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
5-shot stitched pano taken from the top of the tower
in the crumbling
ruin of Montrichard Chateau on the river Cher. They
let you a
Nice shot. I like the way you've included some environment. Nicely
composed. I also like the edges of the negative.
On Sep 17, 2005, at 7:05 PM, frank theriault wrote:
I don't think I've had a PAW for several weeks. Sorry, this is almost
a week late. I wanted to post this on 9/11, but I could
I use K and M lenses every day on my *istD. No problem. Once you become
accustomed to the button, it's not an inconvenience, it's an automatic.
Paul
On Sep 17, 2005, at 9:04 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
too bad pentax has yet to make a DSLR to fully support
them. There were/are some really nice K
T have to DO that "little" step??
Just because YOU don't mind doesn't mean these lenses
are fully supported, they WERE with nearly all the K film bodies.....
JCO
-----Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 9:37 PM
To:
y that it's time you just put this issue aside - give it a
rest
here on the list. Either get a DSLR and try the green button
approach, and
then speak with experience and authority, or just let the rest of the
"fools" go about deluding themselves with the knowledge that you know
best
abo
I suspect this never made it to the list. I never saw it. If it's a
dupe, please accept my apologies.
Fridayt saw another gallery crawl in Birmingham, Michigan. The gallery
that has been showing some of my work was on the tour, so they asked me
to come in and do some meet and greet. A jazz band
I hadn't seen this shot, although I missed a few posts earlier. I find
this very interesting. It reminds me of those tales of near-death
experiences and moving toward the light. It also reminds me of my days
in New York, and the joy of coming up out of the subway on a nice,
sunny day. Very well
Thanks Boris, Yes, they are a sad couple. The woman sitting on the lap
of the older woman has MS. The older woman is her mother. They were
there with another family member, the brother of the girl with MS. I've
run into them on the street before, but had never photographed them.
This time he sm
True, but one can come extremely close to a film look if one strives to
do so. I can run the range of tonal variations by tweaking the
conversion in PS. Where I end up is what I find most pleasing to the
eye. I don't consider the question of whether or not it looks like
film.
Paul
On Sep 18, 2
Thanks Dave. Yes, there's a blown highlight in .3735934 where the
gallery light is reflecting off glass. I wanted to include this shot,
because the two people are friends of the gallery owner. But the
subjects were almost fully backlit, so I had to do some major tweaking
to bring out skin tones
No one is going to make any new film cameras. If Pentax promised more
film cameras, you can't blame them for backing down on that one.
On Sep 18, 2005, at 10:35 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
i own the D-FA lenses. so what? Pentax promised a film camera above
and one below the *ist. where are they?
He
Chrysler's pushbutton automatics worked fine. Contrary to this
single-case example, they were never a service problem. In fact they
were used on super stock drag race cars for quite a few years. The
transmission was the same Torqueflite that was later used with a lever
shift. The pushbutton dev
I like the way the rows of seats move from light to shadow. Interesting
shot. Very nice.
Paul
On Sep 19, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Jon M wrote:
Would that happen to be the Tanglewood near
Clemmonsville, NC?
--- Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This was taken about an hour before concert time.
You don't want to have to stitch everything. That would be a LOT of
work. The DA 16-45 is wide enough for interior shots in relatively
large rooms. I shot some smallish rooms with it yesterday, and it
sufficed but just barely. The new DA 12-24 should be perfect. It will
reportedly be available
i think i agree.
mishka
On 9/18/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No one is going to make any new film cameras. If Pentax promised more
film cameras, you can't blame them for backing down on that one.
You can rest assured that we get it.
On Sep 19, 2005, at 10:13 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
For your information it was the spotmatic list
and the moderator admitted that he really had
no reason to kick me whatsoever, its just
that due to the incredible amount of blatantly wrong
posts and misconc
I like the wider version. Nicely composed with pleasing colors. With
the focal point on the tips of the stamen, the limited DOF works well
here. I would clone out the other petal or leaf that's visible between
two petals at lower right to preserve the geometry of the composition.
But then again
It's probably a hiccup. The only possible logical explanation would be
the slight reframing could change exposure if you were using the spot
meter. I've had that happen to me. But I've also encountered situations
where my *istD just seemed to get confused and go slightly bonkers.
Might you have
Of course. That's a logical explanation.
Paul
On Sep 20, 2005, at 6:44 AM, John Forbes wrote:
It looks rather as though the aperture didn't stop down fully. Sticky?
John
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:12:50 +0100, mike wilson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ditto.
On Sep 20, 2005, at 8:56 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
From DP Review:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0509/05092001s3pro256.asp
"Fujifilm Japan has today announced that it will make available an
upgrade for the S3 Pro digital SLR which will increase the camera's
internal buffer from 128 MB to 25
I would be happy to support a petition that follows the type of
responsible input suggested below. Although we should remember that the
successor to the *istD is probably already close to completion. It may
well be too late to consider our wants..
Paul
On Sep 21, 2005, at 1:53 AM, John Francis
Hi Shel,
Sometimes it's a result of red and blue chromatic aberration. If so,
you can correct it reasonably well by going to the "lens" tab in the
RAW converter and adjusting the CA sliders. At other times it seems to
be the result of backlight on dark objects, such as branches against a
sky a
But do the upsize interpolation in the RAW conversion process. If you
have to do it later, use Bicubic Smoother.
Paul
On Sep 21, 2005, at 5:40 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 21/9/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
So, what ppi do you use for what size/type prints? If all I can get
are
sma
Perhaps by today's prices. I expect it will be a 2k camera before long.
On Sep 21, 2005, at 9:16 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
unfortunately, i think you have just spec'd a $4K camera, ignoring the
noise requirement.
Herb
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday,
Pretty. I'm sure they're the first of many to come. I look forward to
seeing more.
Paul
On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:27 AM, John Graves wrote:
I think I like my ist-DS. Here are the first of my new pictures
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=529887
Comments please.
John G.
I was going to ask about Casselbury just the other day. Haven't heard
from him in a long time. Miss his "Photography of the Oregon Coast."
Paul
On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:03 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Bruce Dayton"
Subject: Re: PDML 10th anniversary
Geez, I'm tr
I like IPhoto slide shows. They're easy to make and with music, they
can be a hoot.
Paul
On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:16 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Update on my profile snags
However i order the ibook before this discovery.
Its not goi
I print with an Epson 2200 and am very satisfied. In several years and
over 600 13 x 19 prints, I've never experienced a drip or a clogged
head. The 2400 is the latest version of this printer. I'll upgrade when
my 2200 begins to show signs of wear. Maybe sooner. My favorite matte
paper is Epson
I knew this would get better when Bill got home:-).
On Sep 22, 2005, at 2:14 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Camera engineering (This is signifigant)
ARE YOU RETARDED are ARE YOU JUST PLAYING DUMB?
I'm just seeing how retarded I ca
How are you using them? I have two bodies that I work hard nearly every
day. With about 2 1/2 years of combined use and 15,000 frames or so, no
problems. Do you get them wet, drop them, subject them to a lot of RFI?
Paul
On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:16 AM, Kevin Waterson wrote:
Seems to me the digital
Nice shot. Excellent conversion. I'd like it even more if you cropped
out about half of the street area. At least I think I'd like it
more:-).
Paul
On Sep 23, 2005, at 12:25 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
tree
light
shadow
in such stark symmetry
Yes, some excellent shots here. Love the motion blur on the opening.
And the pics of the anchors under the studio lights really pop. Good
job.
On Sep 23, 2005, at 6:45 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 23, 2005, at 1:40 PM, Cotty wrote:
In Britain, Thursday saw the 50th anniversary of ITV (
Hi Shel,
Our paths are similar. The LX was the most contemporary camera I had
used prior to purchasing an *istD. I found the viewfinder information a
bit disconcerting at first, particularly the flash indicator that you
mentioned. However, after using the camera for awhile I forgot that it
was
Hi Shel,
For a 3/4 rear shot (like this) or a similar front angle I focus on
the license plate. The viewer's impression of sharpness is shaped by
the foreground sharpness. The stop I use depends on the DOF of the
particular lens. With that 77, I think you'll need f11 or f16 to keep
the entir
This is my favorite of the three. Rich color, nice detail. I like the
way you've split the frame with the top of the waterfall. It's a
different way of looking at this type of scene.
Paul
On Sep 24, 2005, at 12:29 AM, William Robb wrote:
I promise, last one tonight.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/
What Dave said. I use at least two light magenta and light cyan for
every dark magenta and dark cyan. Yellow is usually the third to go.
Paul
On Sep 24, 2005, at 1:16 AM, David Mann wrote:
On Sep 24, 2005, at 3:50 AM, graywolf wrote:
For photos the individual ink tanks are not that hot a deal.
Nice. Love the abbey pics. And that steak looks good as well:-).
Paul
On Sep 24, 2005, at 6:52 AM, Juan Buhler wrote:
On Thursday I met Gianfranco in Firenze. He was there visiting a
Pentax repair center and I am passing through Italy on my way back to
the US.
We drove to Siena, and spent Thurs
Congratulations. Great shot. Nice layout in the magazine as well. Did
you have the whole row of lights on the original image, or was it
retouched for the pub? Excellent work. A good one for your portfolio.
Paul
On Sep 24, 2005, at 8:18 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Remember this picture in my ETH g
My main case is a Pelican 1550. It holds 13 lenses, an A2X-S converter,
half a dozen filters, five CF cards, 8 spare AA lithiums, and two *istD
bodies with battery grips. I take that on any important shoot. If I'm
going out for a walkaround, I frequently take just one camera and a
lens or one c
I doubt that. My best film lenses -- the FA 50/1.4, the FA 35/2, the K
135,2.5, and the K 85/1.8 to name a few -- also yield the best results
when shooting digital. Bad glass is just bad glass.
Paul
On Sep 24, 2005, at 2:04 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
That might be a factor, the lenses are _too_ g
Nice stuff. I love 043, 046, and 099. Beautiful.
On Sep 24, 2005, at 3:37 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
"Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Links doesn't work here!
I've posted the corrections a couple of times, but here they are again:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/pages/loire001.htm
http:
.
On Sep 24, 2005, at 3:50 PM, Glen wrote:
At 06:43 AM 9/8/2005, Paul Stenquist wrote:
This example is far too bright on my screen, and the contrast has
rendered her complexion almost ruddy. The highlights on her forehead
and in her hair are near white.. My display is a calibrated Apple
flat
Not very PC, but definitely kitsch. As uncomfortable as it might make
some, it's well done.
Paul
On Sep 24, 2005, at 5:10 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Lowest common denominators, would be a better title. Not something
I'd like hanging on my wall.
Tom C wrote:
I had taken a photo for the Kitsch P
Hope your home is okay as well, Sid. The news coverage from Lake
Charles hasn't indicated a lot of structural damage beyond that caused
by falling trees, but it's certainly not complete. Hoping to hear good
news from you in a couple of days.
Paul
On Sep 24, 2005, at 5:40 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Only once did I fail to save my RAW images. That was the first time I
ever used my *istD, and I converted everything to tiff and discarded
the RAWs. Didn't kow any better. As it happens, that was an important
shoot, and one of my best images was recorded that day. Knowing what I
know now about
Underexposure will cause a bit of noise. I can't really tell how much
noise your camera is generating from these small images. There doesn't
appear to be an excessive amount . A good ISO 200 image won't show any
noise printed at 13 x19 from a 72 meg upsized file and viewed with the
naked eye, b
I opened both pics in PhotoShop and looked at them at 400%. There is
almost no noise in the well exposed areas, such as the white part of
the license plate frame or the light maple wood on the picture frame.
The noise in the shadows seems minimal. The BMW appears to be a bit
dirty :-). Seriousl
the
ppi be changed from 240? IAC, uploading the whole file seems
pointless,
but, as is often the case, I may be missing something. It would take a
l-o-n-g time for me to make such an upload.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist
Underexposure will cause a bit of noise. I can&#x
iving only replies an opportunity to see the pix as well.
Shel
[Original Message]
Wrom: BUZXUWLSZLKBRNVWWCUFPEGAUTF
At 06:43 AM 9/8/2005, Paul Stenquist wrote:
This example is far too bright on my screen, and the contrast has
rendered
her complexion almost ruddy. The highlights on her forehead and
Fascinating. Interesting light, nicely composed. Good work.
Paul
On Sep 25, 2005, at 9:46 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I figured I should try to get some Pentax content in my PAWs:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3755687&size=lg
Frank, you'r
I believe Shel uses PSCS, which shows the histogram before, during, and
after conversion modifications. The BMW shot wasn't underexposed
overall. In fact the wheels were close to maximum highlight. But this
crop comes from the shadowed rear panel.
Paul
On Sep 25, 2005, at 9:43 AM, Cory Papen
What Rod said. Buffer size and write speed are the biggest limitations.
Paul
On Sep 25, 2005, at 9:46 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 25 Sep 2005 at 9:42, Mark Roberts wrote:
One of the reasons I like doing the occasional motorsports shoot is to
prove (to myself as much as anyone else) what can be
Hei's the guy from down under who's been living in his car .
On Sep 25, 2005, at 12:13 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Who's Rod?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist
What Rod said. Buffer size and write speed are the biggest
limitations.
On Sep 25, 2005, at 9:46 A
That's him. He was big in "Bambi does Brisbane."
On Sep 25, 2005, at 2:07 PM, Bob W wrote:
surely you mean Rod Studhard
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 September 2005 18:53
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: How Pentax Cou
Let's go back to Herb's complaint. Anyone who shoots action, whether it
be birds, race cars, or surfers, will tell you that a small buffer and
slow write speed are indeed a handicap. No two ways about it. I don't
share his pessimism in regard to the future. I expect a competitive
Pentax digital
Nice shot. A little more DOF would have made it even better.
Paul
On Sep 25, 2005, at 2:50 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
For several mornings, I have observed these particular plants with the
intention of capturing them in good light. I finally went out and did
the task. The image that most struck m
I agree. The unusual frame works well here. Nice shot.
On Sep 25, 2005, at 3:04 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Juan Buhler wrote:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=247
Great Shot, lots of character in both the Dog and the Owner.
For some reaso
Well, since I got the wireless mode to work, I returned to my original
mission: Using the 560 flash high atop the stroboframe with an
Omnibouce 80/20 reflector. (That's a reflector with holes in it that
directs 80% of the light off the reflector and 20% off atypical 8 foot
ceiling. ) I used it
HAR! Good one. Enjoyed this and the other "golf" pic. Do you use
tennis balls? Looked too big to be a golf ball.
Paul
On Feb 25, 2007, at 4:16 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> The lack of water, in liquid form, and sand, in sand form, does not
> stop us in the GWN from enjoying a Sunny Saturday Sip.
Wow! Great stuff. Tell us more about the Jaguar. Where and under what
circumstances? Ditto the Comorant. Both look great but perhaps not
quite real. If I'm wrong, I'll take a beating with a wet noodle, and
you'll take a nature photo award:-)).
Paul
On Feb 25, 2007, at 3:42 PM, Bob Sullivan wr
n bounce mode from my
> experience.
>
> Have you tried the catch light panel built into the
> 540? I have found it works wonders with shorter
> ceilings.
>
> -Brendan
> --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Well, since I got the wireless mode to work, I
>
Yes, I could have shot at a much wider stop. But that's more work,
and I was feeling lazy:-).
Paul
On Feb 25, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Mike Hamilton wrote:
> On 2/25/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5643208&size=lg
If history is any indication, Pentax will be right up front in build
quality. Compare the K10D to similar priced Canons. "Nuff said.
Paul
On Feb 25, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Cotty wrote:
> On 25/2/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> I don't know if they'll hit that price but if they can
No. None of the DA lenses cover a 35 mm frame, save perhaps the DA40,
which was based on a 35 mm lens.
Paul
On Feb 25, 2007, at 5:38 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> I think that DA as a lens prefix should be taken to mean it might
> cover
> a 35mm frame but we won't guarantee it.
>
> Toralf Lund wro
But so far, might hasn't been the operative word. However, I think
that in longer lenses where it makes little difference, they might
well afford more coverage.
Paul
On Feb 25, 2007, at 6:12 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Read the word "might"...
>
> Paul Stenquist wrot
Good to know. That's probably about max then. How much did it cost to
re-cell it? Did you do it yourself or send it to Quantum?
Paul
On Feb 25, 2007, at 11:57 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> I shot about 400 frames with it. It wasn't totally dead, but the
> recycle time had really dropped down. I had
I still can't use Lightroom, because I can't get OSX 4 to install on my
G4 dual 1.25 machine. I returned my disk to Amazon and got a new one.
Same result: the screen grays over and tells me to restart the computer
while the installer is checking the installation DVD. And that happens
from eithe
That's very true. I would guess that ninety-five percent or more of
those who derive all or nearly all of their income from photography
barely eek out a living. Any expense has to be carefully considered.
Even some big-dollar pros are hurting these days. For example, car
shooters are seeing more
Yes, I've done that several times, and I've opened up a lot of room on
my startup drive. I'll probably figure it out, but I'm ticked off about
Apple's lack of support for their own software.
Paul
On Feb 26, 2007, at 6:29 AM, Cotty wrote:
> On 26/2/07, Paul Stenquist
All are correct. Heinz advertising at one time promoted "57 varieties,"
in reference to the number of food products they made at that time.
They also produced a product known "Heinz 57," which is a very good
steak sauce. It's similar to A1 but has a tomato base and is more
peppery. And that's m
On Feb 26, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Cotty wrote:
> On 26/2/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> Yes, I've done that several times, and I've opened up a lot of room on
>> my startup drive. I'll probably figure it out, but I'm ticked off
>>
I'm leaving for work now, but I'll take a pic of it tonight.
Paul
On Feb 26, 2007, at 8:04 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Both are great shots Paul.
>
> Any chance of a photo pf the camera/flash set up. I'm trying to
> picture this in my mind.
>
> Dave
>
That's exactly the point of archaeologists who have studied this.
Mary and Joseph were very common names, as was Jesus. But most
experts say that the third name isn't Jesus anyway. It was
mistranslated. Whether one believes or not, this "discovery" of a
tomb was nothing special. What's more
On Feb 26, 2007, at 6:17 PM, Christian wrote:
> Juan Buhler wrote:
>> On 2/26/07, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> How do you do DNA samples to establish that the bones belonged to
>>> Jesus?
>>> What's your reference sample? The Shroud of Turin? Or do you
>>> go to
>>> Rosslyn
For sports shooters, it's a no brainer. You have to go with Canon.
For a studio pro, who does mainly fashion, the 645 might be
approving. Many of the New York fashion shooters were using the
Pentax 6x7 last I heard. Don't know what they're using now. But if
some are still shooting film, the
Fascinating. The face of the statue has succumbed to age, but it
gives it an eery, mysterious look. I assume that what appears to be
flowers hanging around the neck is a plant draped over the statue.
Well seen, nice conversion.
Paul
On Feb 26, 2007, at 7:18 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> The last
Very good!
But you forgot:
1 to ARGUE ENDLESSLY and PROFANELY that the light bulb should have
been equipped with an aperture simulator.
Paul
On Feb 26, 2007, at 8:10 PM, Tom C wrote:
> How many mailing list members does it take to change a light bulb?
>
> 1 to change the light bulb and to post t
The fundamentalists don't have to get all over it. The archaeologists
and scientists already have. Cameron is a famous con artist. I almost
made the mistake of working with him once on some Dodge commercials
when he had his CGI post production business. We were going to build
them from CATI
se new to learn
>
> russ
>
>
> On 2/25/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well, since I got the wireless mode to work, I returned to my original
>> mission: Using the 560 flash high atop the stroboframe with an
>> Omnibouce 80/20 reflector. (That'
I''ll take a pic of it sometime soon. Spent last night working on the
computer. Still without success, but I guess I'm narrowing it down.
Paul
On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:25 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> I shall definitely like to see the setup.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Boris
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> It
Thanks Marnie.
On Feb 27, 2007, at 2:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This was a nice
>> conclusion to what
>> has been a weekend from hell with rampant flu
>> throughout the house and
>> even an ambulance trip to the hospital for
>> 91-year-old mom (who is a
>> back home and okay now). But tha
Well done. Good job of dealing with the shadows.
Paul
On Feb 27, 2007, at 3:13 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
> Yes, Photoshop lights&shadows.
> Ciao,
> Dario
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007
It's an excellent lens and I use it quite often. I've even used it for
paying jobs, particularly when covering events. It's light and compact
and, for the price, rather well made. Very good.
Paul
On Feb 27, 2007, at 4:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am thinking of getting the DA 50-200mm. E
wrote:
> Mmm BTW do 67 lenses provide mecanical coupling when used on 645 with
> adaptor or one you them like M42 on K body ?
>
> 2007/2/27, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> For sports shooters, it's a no brainer. You have to go with Canon.
>> For a studio pro
Mike thinks this lens may be a bit soft. It's not. At least the one I
own isn't. Not in any way or at any focal length. It does lend itself
to inappropriate use in that it has the FOV of a 300mm lens, yet it
feels like a 70. Here's a pic at 60mm, wide open, 1/60th second with a
bit of flash fil
Sorry, misread my EXIF data. This was shot with the FA 50/1.4 at f4.
Doh, it better be sharp. But I have examples from the DA 50-200 that
are very close if not equal. I'll look for one later. Gotta go to work
to pay for more toys (and feed six people:-).
Paul
On Feb 27, 2007, at 7:51 AM,
HAR! I thought of your PUG shot when I saw Boris' post. You set the
standard for screen shots:-). But an interesting effort by Boris
nonetheless.
Paul
On Feb 27, 2007, at 6:49 PM, William Robb wrote:
> Like this?
>
> http://pug.komkon.org/01feb/pixels.html
>
>
> William Robb
>
>
> - Origina
Looks like weird reflections on the screen to me. Glad you were able to
take in another orphaned lens.
Paul
On Feb 27, 2007, at 8:57 PM, William Robb wrote:
> That poor DA70mm lens. There it was, sitting unloved and unused on a
> camera
> store shelf.
> Lens purgatory.
> The damnation of the unb
>>>> DFA55 is announced as being compatible with previous 645 bodies (and
>>>> it has an aperture ring).
>>>>
>>>> So it should (hopefully) be OK.
>>>>
>>>> 2007/2/27, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
101 - 200 of 23489 matches
Mail list logo
