Interesting take. As it happens, they weren’t aware of me, but I only know that
because I was there. The shot has to speak for itself.
m
> On Oct 29, 2016, at 5:49 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> My least favorite, because jumpers know you are there - or so it appears.
>
My least favorite, because jumpers know you are there - or so it
appears. Not that it isn't a nice shot- but not as intersting to me as
the rest.
ann
On 10/29/2016 1:39 AM, Marco Alpert wrote:
Thanks, Brian!
- Marco
On Oct 28, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Brian Walters
Thanks, Brian!
- Marco
> On Oct 28, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016, at 04:47 PM, Marco Alpert wrote:
>> Featuring an encore appearance of the man with the dog:
>>
>> http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo16/peso28.html
>>
>
>
> Nicely
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016, at 04:47 PM, Marco Alpert wrote:
> Featuring an encore appearance of the man with the dog:
>
> http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo16/peso28.html
>
Nicely timed - and the encore appearance is a welcome component of the
image.
Cheers
Brian
Excellent. More man with the dog please!
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Marco Alpert wrote:
> Thanks so much, Larry.
>
> Marco
>
>> On Oct 28, 2016, at 3:08 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On October 27, 2016 11:36:42 PM PDT, Malcolm Smith
>>>
Thanks so much, Larry.
Marco
> On Oct 28, 2016, at 3:08 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
>> On October 27, 2016 11:36:42 PM PDT, Malcolm Smith
>> wrote:
>> Marco Alpert wrote:
>>
>> http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo16/peso28.html
>>
>>
Thanks, Malcolm.
Marco
> On Oct 27, 2016, at 11:36 PM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
>
> Marco Alpert wrote:
>
> http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo16/peso28.html
>
> +++
>
> I'm beginning to like the man with the dog. His expression
On October 27, 2016 11:36:42 PM PDT, Malcolm Smith
wrote:
>Marco Alpert wrote:
>
>http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo16/peso28.html
>
>+++
>
>I'm beginning to like the man with the dog. His expression is a
>delight.
And the
Marco Alpert wrote:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo16/peso28.html
+++
I'm beginning to like the man with the dog. His expression is a delight.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Featuring an encore appearance of the man with the dog:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo16/peso28.html
Comments, as always, welcomed.
-Marco
---
http://www.alpert.com/marco
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Thanks to all who had a look commented... it's official, the shadow stays!
:)
Marnie, this is actually our neighbor's trampoline, too. They are
rarely home, and don't mind us borrowing it every now then. It's
built over a pit, so the tramp is at grade...My daughter loves it,
she's a gymnast,
I think it's not worth worrying about. :-)
Nice one! you caught her at just the right moment. Good timing.
Neighbors put in a trampoline and every now and then see the top of a
person bouncing up and down (over the top of the fence). Took me a minute the
first time it happened to figure
love it, Christine! Lots of fun! Cheers, Christine
On Oct 3, 2013, at 8:27 PM, Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote:
Trampolines are so much fun. It's a pity they are so dangerous.
We took a risk, in order to try out my new radio triggers...
The shadow really makes the image!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool shot! The shadow adds to it enormously.
I'd build a bigger fence. :-) Or just set up a backdrop there, just
big
On 3/10/13, Christine Nielsen, discombobulated, unleashed:
Trampolines are so much fun. It's a pity they are so dangerous.
We took a risk, in order to try out my new radio triggers...
http://www.christinenielsen.com/sharing/h7f652ab4#h7f652ab4
This was just for testing fun, but next time I
I don't think there's a problem with the shadow. It's a great shot.
On 4 Oct 2013, at 02:27, Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote:
Trampolines are so much fun. It's a pity they are so dangerous.
We took a risk, in order to try out my new radio triggers...
Wonderful! Absolutely show this picture to her when she's like 21 years
old. Personally, I think shadow only adds here.
On 10/4/2013 4:27 AM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
Trampolines are so much fun. It's a pity they are so dangerous.
We took a risk, in order to try out my new radio triggers...
Thanks, Bruce, Jack, Bob Boris... I appreciate the feedback!
:)
-c
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Wonderful! Absolutely show this picture to her when she's like 21 years old.
Personally, I think shadow only adds here.
On 10/4/2013 4:27 AM, Christine
I like the shadow!
Great shot.
Cheers,
frank
Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote:
Trampolines are so much fun. It's a pity they are so dangerous.
We took a risk, in order to try out my new radio triggers...
http://www.christinenielsen.com/sharing/h7f652ab4#h7f652ab4
This was just for
Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 6:27 PM
Subject: peso: jump!
Trampolines are so much fun. It's a pity they are so dangerous.
We took a risk, in order to try out my new radio triggers...
http://www.christinenielsen.com
Trampolines are so much fun. It's a pity they are so dangerous.
We took a risk, in order to try out my new radio triggers...
http://www.christinenielsen.com/sharing/h7f652ab4#h7f652ab4
This was just for testing fun, but next time I might try to position
the lights to eliminate the shadow. Or,
Cool shot! The shadow adds to it enormously.
I'd build a bigger fence. :-) Or just set up a backdrop there, just
big enough to catch the shadow and include the surroundings in the
shot.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote:
Trampolines are so much fun.
:
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 6:27 PM
Subject: peso: jump!
Trampolines are so much fun. It's a pity they are so dangerous.
We took a risk, in order to try out my new radio triggers...
http://www.christinenielsen.com/sharing/h7f652ab4#h7f652ab4
This was just for testing fun, but next time I
Another taken on my way to work:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17524171
or
http://gallery.photo.net/photo/17524171-lg.jpg
Comments welcome!
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
I have a feeling you are going to be encountering some construction on
your way to work pretty soon
ann
On 9/13/2013 21:02, Rick Womer wrote:
Another taken on my way to work:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17524171
or
http://gallery.photo.net/photo/17524171-lg.jpg
Comments
13, 2013 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Jump!
I have a feeling you are going to be encountering some construction on
your way to work pretty soon
ann
On 9/13/2013 21:02, Rick Womer wrote:
Another taken on my way to work:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17524171
or
http
List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Jump!
I have a feeling you are going to be encountering some construction on
your way to work pretty soon
ann
On 9/13/2013 21:02, Rick Womer wrote:
Another taken on my way to work:
http://photo.net/photodb
H...
;-)
Cheers,
frank
Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Another taken on my way to work:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17524171
or
http://gallery.photo.net/photo/17524171-lg.jpg
Comments welcome!
Rick
“Analysis kills spontaneity.” -- Henri-Frederic Amiel
--
PDML
I hope there was a Busby Berkeley number soon after. That's great twins
buy the same swimmers too.
On 7/08/2012 12:02 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
Fooling around with my twin friends in Ohio. Thank goodness for a splash-proof
K7!
On Aug 8, 2012, at 9:33, Derby Chang wrote:
I hope there was a Busby Berkeley number soon after. That's great twins buy
the same swimmers too.
While most twins (self included) abhor the idea of dressing alike in public,
you are ritually mocked if you show up at a Twins Days festival
On Aug 6, 2012, at 23:53, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Great, well-timed shot, Charles! I do hope the two in the foreground were
wearing waterproof sunscreen, though. Quite a contrast between those two and
the ones right next to them!
Yeah, Scott and Jason are extremely pale individuals. I think
Fun shot, well executed.
Paul
On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:42 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Aug 6, 2012, at 23:53, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Great, well-timed shot, Charles! I do hope the two in the foreground were
wearing waterproof sunscreen, though. Quite a contrast between those two and
the
On Aug 6, 2012, at 21:02, Charles Robinson wrote:
Fooling around with my twin friends in Ohio. Thank goodness for a
splash-proof K7!
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2012/twins_days/content/IMGP2404_large.html
BTW, a woman photographing from the side of the pool was fascinated
Fooling around with my twin friends in Ohio. Thank goodness for a splash-proof
K7!
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2012/twins_days/content/IMGP2404_large.html
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
Wild, bizarre and great fun!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
Fooling around with my twin friends in Ohio. Thank goodness for a
splash-proof K7!
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Jump!
Fooling around with my twin friends in Ohio. Thank goodness for a splash-proof
K7!
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2012/twins_days/content/IMGP2404_large.html
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
Great, well-timed shot, Charles! I do hope the two in the foreground
were wearing waterproof sunscreen, though. Quite a contrast between
those two and the ones right next to them!
-- Walt
On 8/6/2012 9:02 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
Fooling around with my twin friends in Ohio. Thank
This was a photo taken at Austin Lindy Exchange-2009
It was done during a social dance, and was not setup or prepared.
I only had a split moment to take it without much of a warning.
Enjoy:
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2009/Jump_IR_1274.jpg
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
This was a photo taken at Austin Lindy Exchange-2009
It was done during a social dance, and was not setup or prepared.
I only had a split moment to take it without much of a warning.
Enjoy:
From: Igor Roshchin
This was a photo taken at Austin Lindy Exchange-2009
It was done during a social dance, and was not setup or prepared.
I only had a split moment to take it without much of a warning.
Enjoy:
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/Mixed-2009/Jump_IR_1274.jpg
You caught the
In a message dated 12/23/2009 1:23:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
s...@komkon.org writes:
This was a photo taken at Austin Lindy Exchange-2009
It was done during a social dance, and was not setup or prepared.
I only had a split moment to take it without much of a warning.
Enjoy:
That's great fun, Igor. Good timing--composition is great too! Cheers,
Christine
- Original Message -
From: Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org
To: PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 3:23 PM
Subject: PESO - Jump
This was a photo taken at Austin Lindy Exchange-2009
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:41:08 -0400, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well, this-a-one got declined from the gallery, but I still like it,
so I thought I'd show it to you guys here. This fellow practically
posed for me:
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/Spider/photo#5202892640684427378
thanks Walter, Marnie, Paul, Frank, Toine and Brian! I really had fun
taking this, although herding a jumping spider is a skill I have yet
to master
rg2
On 6/7/08, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:41:08 -0400, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well, this-a-one
Well, this-a-one got declined from the gallery, but I still like it,
so I thought I'd show it to you guys here. This fellow practically
posed for me:
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/Spider/photo#5202892640684427378
Taken with a 50mm 1:1.4 with a reversing ring, *ist D
rg2
--
PDML
WOW! That one gives a whole new meaning to the term four eyes!
Nice macro, Rebekah.
Walt
On 6/6/08, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, this-a-one got declined from the gallery, but I still like it,
so I thought I'd show it to you guys here. This fellow practically
posed for me:
In a message dated 6/6/2008 12:41:32 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, this-a-one got declined from the gallery, but I still like it,
so I thought I'd show it to you guys here. This fellow practically
posed for me:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, this-a-one got declined from the gallery, but I still like it,
so I thought I'd show it to you guys here. This fellow practically
posed for me:
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/Spider/photo#5202892640684427378
Taken
Cool. The shadows make it work.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, this-a-one got declined from the gallery, but I still like it,
so I thought I'd show it to you guys here. This fellow practically
posed for me:
Very nice. lovely shadows.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, this-a-one got declined from the gallery, but I still like it,
so I thought I'd show it to you guys here. This fellow practically
posed for me:
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/28 Fri AM 03:21:41 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: [OT] Whales for lunch (was PESO - Jump)
Personally I like Reunite Pangaea!
The Canon of continents.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jul 25, 2006, at 8:17
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:59:19 +0100, Keith McGuinness
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Pardon me saying this Tom: but the run about like naked animals part
sounds very ethnocentric in my ears. To be totally strait with you, I
find
it rather offensive.
...like naked animals...
Personally I like Reunite Pangaea!
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jul 25, 2006, at 8:17 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
Friend of mine has a bumper sticker designed to offend almost
everybody. It reads NUKE THE GAY WHALES!
I always thought it was Nuke the Gay Whales for Christ
It
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/25/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it have to be their own wife? How about we post pictures of other
people's naked wives?
I'm easy.
cheers,
frank
But are you cheap?
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and
Nice, very tasteful. Yours?
DagT wrote:
Den 25. jul. 2006 kl. 19.18 skrev frank theriault:
On 7/25/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're a prude ;-)
I say: someone ~should~ post a picture of their naked wife, just as a
scientific experiment, to guage the reaction...
probably time to let it drop, n'est pas?
Tom C.
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO - Jump
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:25:31 +0200
Pardon me saying this Tom: but the run about
-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO - Jump
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:25:31 +0200
Pardon me saying this Tom: but the run about like naked animals
part
sounds very ethnocentric in my ears. To be totally strait with
you, I find
it rather offensive.
In Norway, it is totally common
Yes .-)
Den 28. jul. 2006 kl. 05.56 skrev P. J. Alling:
Nice, very tasteful. Yours?
DagT wrote:
Den 25. jul. 2006 kl. 19.18 skrev frank theriault:
On 7/25/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're a prude ;-)
I say: someone ~should~ post a picture of their naked wife, just
Den 26. jul. 2006 kl. 00.26 skrev Tom C:
The internet is just an image or reflection of the world in general.
Exactly, TomC. The world in general, and not just North America.
North American laws and their weird interpretations are not relevant
there.
DagT
http://dag.foto.no
Please note
I have a problem even reading PDML at work, simply because it is not
what I´m paid for (and being one of the owners I guess I should be a
good example). For that reason a person watching porn at work could
loose his job, even here.
Once in a while, when I´ve had to search for things on the
Thanks!
DagT
Den 26. jul. 2006 kl. 04.49 skrev Paul Stenquist:
Nice work, Dag. I wouldn't hesitate to look at this at work or
anywhere else.
Beautiful picture.
Paul
On Jul 25, 2006, at 10:32 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Dag,
Nice photo, but not one for work.
I would be uncomfortable
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/25 Tue PM 07:36:39 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Jump
On 7/25/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ex-wives might be a safer option.
Clearly, you've never seen my ex-wife...
So
At 02:42 PM 26/07/2006, DagT wrote:
Den 26. jul. 2006 kl. 00.26 skrev Tom C:
The internet is just an image or reflection of the world in general.
Exactly, TomC. The world in general, and not just North America.
North American laws and their weird interpretations are not relevant
there.
Dag,
Fra: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 02:42 PM 26/07/2006, DagT wrote:
Den 26. jul. 2006 kl. 00.26 skrev Tom C:
The internet is just an image or reflection of the world in general.
Exactly, TomC. The world in general, and not just North America.
North American laws and their weird
Fra: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 26, 2006, at 4:46 AM, DagT wrote:
Another thing is that the responses, and some of the partially hidden
accusations from Tom C and William R, does not really make me want to
help them protect themselves...
Great, that's fine, but what
On Jul 26, 2006, at 4:46 AM, DagT wrote:
Another thing is that the responses, and some of the partially hidden
accusations from Tom C and William R, does not really make me want to
help them protect themselves...
Great, that's fine, but what about the rest of us?
-Aaron
--
PDML
Another thing is that the responses, and some of the partially hidden
accusations from Tom C and William R, does not really make me want to help
them protect themselves...
DagT
Don't worry about it. No love lost here. If kids in your country that are
way old enough to know how to dress
Den 26. jul. 2006 kl. 17.51 skrev Tom C:
Another thing is that the responses, and some of the partially hidden
accusations from Tom C and William R, does not really make me want
to help
them protect themselves...
DagT
Don't worry about it. No love lost here. If kids in your country
of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tom C
Sent: 26. juli 2006 17:52
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Jump
Another thing is that the responses
, n'est pas?
Tom C.
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO - Jump
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:25:31 +0200
Pardon me saying this Tom: but the run about like naked animals part
sounds very
Of
Tom C
Sent: 26. juli 2006 19:15
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO - Jump
Actually Tim,
I don't have as much problem with it as my previous posts might imply.
Sorry
for coming across as offensive. Thinking other's customs are strange, and
showing a degree of tolerance works both ways
.
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO - Jump
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:25:31 +0200
Pardon me saying this Tom: but the run about like naked animals
part
sounds very ethnocentric in my
Sounds good!
Tom C.
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Jump
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:15:23 +0200
Tim is good at this, isn´t he.
OK, I´ll admit that I was probably unnecessarily
Not just North America... ;-)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=397618in_page_id=1770
Tom C.
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Jump
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:21:32
That was definitely not a strong enough warning Bob...
Norm
From: Bob W
Warning: not office friendly. Not out-of-the-office friendly either.
In fact, not an act of friendship by any description, anywhere,
anytime or anyhow. Do not follow this link if you are easily offended.
Do not follow
://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/galleries/index.html?in_image_id=2726
59in_gallery_id=8276in_page_id=1055
Told you so.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom C
Sent: 26 July 2006 20:55
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Jump
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom C
Sent: 26 July 2006 20:55
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Jump
Not just North America... ;-)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?
in_article_id=397618in_page_id=1770
Tom C.
From: Tom C [EMAIL
-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Jump
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:21:32 -0600
Sounds good!
Tom C.
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Jump
On 26/7/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Warning: not office friendly. Not out-of-the-office friendly either.
In fact, not an act of friendship by any description, anywhere,
anytime or anyhow. Do not follow this link if you are easily offended.
Do not follow this link even if you are
Bob W wrote:
The gallery shows why such an apparently draconian measure is for the
good of all humanity!
Especially this:
Warning: not office friendly. Not out-of-the-office friendly either.
In fact, not an act of friendship by any description, anywhere,
anytime or anyhow. Do not follow
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Pardon me saying this Tom: but the run about like naked animals part
sounds very ethnocentric in my ears. To be totally strait with you, I find
it rather offensive.
...like naked animals...
I don't find it offensive, just incomprehensible.
Humans originally took to wearing
Of
DagT
Sent: 26. juli 2006 20:15
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - Jump
Tim is good at this, isn´t he.
OK, I´ll admit that I was probably unnecessarily provoked by some
statements. I won´t get into which.
It is time to stop the thread folks. Let´s discuss some
Fra: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - Jump
Agreed. Although I still think people should warn for non-kiddie porn nude
kid pics.
In North America, there is not a solid line dividing non kiddie porn nude
On 7/23/06, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friend of mine has a bumper sticker designed to offend almost
everybody. It reads NUKE THE GAY WHALES!
As a person who knows someone who works in the nuclear energy
industry, I find that offensive...
g
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
On Jul 25, 2006, at 7:24, frank theriault wrote:
On 7/23/06, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friend of mine has a bumper sticker designed to offend almost
everybody. It reads NUKE THE GAY WHALES!
As a person who knows someone who works in the nuclear energy
industry, I find that
I've seen, Nuke the unborn baby whales. Still more offensive material:-).
-- Original message --
From: Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 25, 2006, at 7:24, frank theriault wrote:
On 7/23/06, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friend of mine has a
In North America, there is not a solid line dividing non kiddie porn nude
pics from kiddie porn.
William Robb
While I'm not offended by the human body, if I was at a public park and saw
pre-pubescent older children running around naked I would likely leave.
That being said, I don't enjoy
Interesting change in values here. It used to be naked children were not
considered offensive, the boys were actually required to swim in the
nude at school. Now it is porn. At one time it was considered indecent
for a woman to show her ankle, now they wear very skimpy bikinis in
public --and
On Jul 25, 2006, at 8:17 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
Friend of mine has a bumper sticker designed to offend almost
everybody. It reads NUKE THE GAY WHALES!
I always thought it was Nuke the Gay Whales for Christ
It goes right next to the bumper sticker that says
STOP NUCLEAR DECAY!
G
--
On 25/7/06, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
While I'm not offended by the human body, if I was at a public park and saw
pre-pubescent older children running around naked I would likely leave.
That being said, I don't enjoy looking at this kind of picture either. And
even more, I question
On 7/25/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're a prude ;-)
I say: someone ~should~ post a picture of their naked wife, just as a
scientific experiment, to guage the reaction...
cheers,
frank
g
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/25/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're a prude ;-)
I say: someone ~should~ post a picture of their naked wife, just as a
scientific experiment, to guage the reaction...
Ex-wives might be a safer option.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Jul 25, 2006, at 3:04 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Ex-wives might be a safer option.
OH OH Frank has one of those!!
;)
-Aaron
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 7/25/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OH OH Frank has one of those!!
One,
That you know of...
BTW, Aaron, I was cleaning up some old g-mail messages, and it appears
that I forgot to get back to you last month or something like that.
Mea Culpa.
Does this mean that my acting
On 7/25/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ex-wives might be a safer option.
Clearly, you've never seen my ex-wife...
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
If Dag posted a naked picture of his wife, might some
consider that porn? I
would suggest so. Now, show naked pictures of children.
It's just a step
away.
Tom C.
If you don't know why there's a difference I think you should get some
counselling.
Regards,
Bob
--
PDML
Subject: RE: PESO - Jump
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:05:43 +0100
If Dag posted a naked picture of his wife, might some
consider that porn? I
would suggest so. Now, show naked pictures of children.
It's just a step
away.
Tom C.
If you don't know why there's a difference I think you
On 25/7/06, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
I say: someone ~should~ post a picture of their naked wife, just as a
scientific experiment, to guage the reaction...
LOL way to go frank
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Then you must learn to express yourself more clearly!
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom C
Sent: 25 July 2006 21:18
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO - Jump
You miss my point. It was that if a naked picture
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: 25 July 2006 21:34
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: PESO - Jump
On 25/7/06, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
I say: someone ~should~ post a picture of their naked wife
1 - 100 of 277 matches
Mail list logo