On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, P.J. Alling wrote:
Well Ann, you're going to get a huge increase in real resolution,
and the files will tax your computer's capabilities. Now that
you've got good eyes, you can enjoy it. You might want to check out
buydig for a new K-5. They're selling for less than
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, P.J. Alling wrote:
I've got one more utility to try on the drive before I take it out
of it's enclosure, so I apparently have a new hobby and it's not
photography.
All digital photographers are by definition computer hobbyists.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
How many angels fit on the head of a 32gb card? I can't imagine
shooting more than 300 to 400 frames - if that.
The Pentax K-5 II was getting 900 DNGs per 32GB card. I couldn't
imagine taking more than 200-300 shots in a day before my Alaska cruise,
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 7/11/2013 00:48, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
How many angels fit on the head of a 32gb card? I can't imagine
shooting more than 300 to 400 frames - if that.
The Pentax K-5 II was getting 900 DNGs per 32GB card. I
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, Walt wrote:
On 7/10/2013 11:48 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
How many angels fit on the head of a 32gb card? I can't imagine
shooting more than 300 to 400 frames - if that.
The Pentax K-5 II was getting 900 DNGs per 32GB card. I
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
so from a practical aspect, what is the difference if when I output
from elements I'd be making are 300 ppi jpgs ? or pngs?
That doesn't matter much.
I have no experience at all with DNGS... anyone want to school me
briefly?
The difference is
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Same thing's happened in other industries. Everyone wants you to
buy their products exclusively, not mix-and-match. Everything's
proprietary these days, by design.
No, no, no, you misunderstand. Everything is standardized. It's just
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17445131
K-r with FA 100 F2.8 macro and monopod
Weird, the EXIF on photo.net claims it's 115mm...
Nice work!
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013, P.J. Alling wrote:
Which is what they are really. Two different aesthetics, 75 years
and no improvement really.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20%20boxes.html
Were you singing while you worked on that?
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, steve harley wrote:
long story short, i saved his bacon and got a sweet deal; 50-135 is
fantastic lens, but a bit of a workout for my shoulder; i will
probably resell the rest
Congrats! Why not keep the 16-50?
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013, George Sinos wrote:
http://georgesinos.com/blog/2013/6/27/how-big-is-my-front-yard
I took a few pictures with different lenses to change the apparent
size of my yard. I figure if I ever want to sell the house I'll use a
photo like the one at the top of the post.
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013, steve harley wrote:
on 2013-07-01 14:33 Aahz Maruch wrote
Well, I do have something very specific in mind. ;-) I'm highly
keyboard-focused, and I have yet to figure out how to easily switch
between multiple terminal windows spread across multiple virtual
desktops. (E.g
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013, Paul Stenquist wrote:
A 16 gig card in a k-5 holds 460 frames RAW.
That closely matches my experience of ~900 shots on 32GB.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
* * *
Help a
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 7/14/2013 18:18, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013, Paul Stenquist wrote:
A 16 gig card in a k-5 holds 460 frames RAW.
That closely matches my experience of ~900 shots on 32GB.
Sounds good, and more than I'll need. IF I had to review 460
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013, Mark Roberts wrote:
Just returned from two weeks of exhausting and exhilarating hiking it
Italy. Stories and photos to follow soon!
Mark!
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
* * *
Help
He does mention Pentax...
http://www.f-stopeight.com/confessions-of-an-ex-gear-addict-how-buying-cameras-and-lenses-made-me-miserable-and-loose-thousands/
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
* * *
I love dead.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013, John wrote:
It's also a menu choice under File Format. See page 202 in the K-5
manual (available as a free PDF file from Pentax).
Just a reminder to Ann that the K-5 manual is *not* the same as the one
for K-5 II, make sure you get the right one (makes little difference
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013, John wrote:
On 7/15/2013 8:19 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
A wedding photog has a fine-print clause in his contract that
prohibits customers from posting negative reviews of his services:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 7/15/2013 20:02, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013, John wrote:
It's also a menu choice under File Format. See page 202 in the K-5
manual (available as a free PDF file from Pentax).
Just a reminder to Ann that the K-5 manual is *not* the same
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Funny, as I thought of the 16MP sensor in the K-5IIs as the second
most important reason to upgrade from the K-5 (the first one being
of course the huge improvement in AF accuracy in odd light). 16MP is
already more than I need and I'm happy to delay
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, Dario Bonazza wrote:
-Messaggio originale- From: Aahz Maruch
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Funny, as I thought of the 16MP sensor in the K-5IIs as the second
most important reason to upgrade from the K-5 (the first one being
of course the huge
Given that we have so many bicyclists here and given the second URL has
some up-close-and-personal shots of the wolf, I figured I'd pass this
along:
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2013/jul/11/landers-wolf-chases-sandpoint-cyclist-down-alaska/
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, John wrote:
Rumor has it that *SOMEDAY* there's going to be a FF Pentax DSLR.
No, no, no, someday there will be a rumor that there's going to be a FF
Pentax DSLR.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
*
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, John Sessoms wrote:
The replacement for my smashed Leslie amplifier speaker arrived at
the store today. They called I went down for the unpacking. Much
more securely packed than the first one.
Hooked it up and tested it out at the store to make sure everything
was
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, Bruce Walker wrote:
Zos, eyebrows are my litmus test for system sharpness. Get a well-lit
headshot of somebody and examine their eyebrows. You should clearly
see the individual hairs. Any time I handhold to get such a shot the
eyebrows are invariably a gaussian smear.
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
Anyone have other suggestions for a Linux RAW editor/manager?
Although I've looked through all the replies, I didn't see some of
the Linux solutions out there. Thus I'll
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, Mark C wrote:
If you really want a challenge go for a gnat's eyebrows -
Mark!
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
* * *
Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 7/17/2013 00:17, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com:
at the moment I'm shooting rawjpg in camera... and I rather like it..
what I've lost in the settings is while I extended the ISO to 51200 I
don't see where I set it to
Remember, you have no privacy.
More seriously, does anyone remember why this list is set for reply-to
list? Very few other lists I'm on these days are set that way, precisely
because the failure mode is worse with reply-to list (screw up with
reply-to sender and you only send something private
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jul 17, 2013, at 09:25 , Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
More seriously, does anyone remember why this list is set for reply-to
list? Very few other lists I'm on these days are set that way, precisely
because the failure mode is worse
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
ok AAHZ, fess up - what did you send to list that you meant to be
private? and just how much trouble did you get into? ;-)
Not me! It was Zos!
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
*
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, P.J. Alling wrote:
[...] I'm not semi retired, I'm under employed, and I'd like to say
I'm curmudgeonly from years of dealing with a--holes in software
development racket, but actual, I was born that way.
How many of us resemble that remark?
raises hand
--
Hugs and
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I first read the subject line as ... on a Cat's tail :-)
...and I read it as Swallowing a cat's tail...
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
* * *
Help a
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 7/17/2013 13:54, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
ok AAHZ, fess up - what did you send to list that you meant to be
private? and just how much trouble did you get into? ;-)
Not me! It was Zos!
So does that mean you
Photo essay with weird CSS -- I'm curious what people think about the
presentation (I know it's just CSS because I originally viewed this in a
browser with JS off).
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-07-11/japans-internet-cafes-home-for-the-underemployed
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013, Bill wrote:
On 17/07/2013 2:03 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
Unlike many people of my birth culture (Jewish), I don't do guilt.
Your mother must love you.
She grew up on a kibbutz, she doesn't do guilt, either.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013, Rick Womer wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1794size=lg
The window box and shadow definitely make it work.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
* * *
Help a
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, John wrote:
Those collapsible reflector/diffuser kits can be used as wind
modifiers as well as light modifiers.
Amen -- in fact, that's mostly what I use mine for.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
*
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Bob Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jul 17, 2013, at 09:25 , Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
More seriously, does anyone remember why this list is set for reply
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013, Bill wrote:
On 18/07/2013 8:51 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
And your point is? FSM knows I'm *so* not a fan of change for
change's sake, but I also think it's bizarre to excuse a state of
affairs as that's the way we've always done it. If people
actually do prefer reply
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013, Bob Sullivan wrote:
This is a list. Posting has been this way for 10+ years.
And your point is? FSM knows I'm *so* not a fan of change for
change's sake, but I also think it's bizarre to excuse a state of affairs
as that's the way we've always done it. If
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013, Gerrit Visser wrote:
We came home from our cruise to find him a full blown diabetic. After 3
months, many $ and insulin injections later, he is now almost recovered
(cats are unique that way). But as a result he gets even more spoiled than
before. That used to be my
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013, Mark Roberts wrote:
Every email list I've ever been on has had reply-to-list as the
default. Why would you participate in a mailing list and not want
replies sent to the... list? Makes no sense.
Interesting -- even before the various lists I've been started changing
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
I started out from the premise of Photo sessions for the shy, and here is
what I wrote on the subject of making people feel comfortable in front of the
camera. I would greatly appreciate feedback, suggestions and further
ideas for future iterations
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013, Mark Roberts wrote:
Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013, Mark Roberts wrote:
Every email list I've ever been on has had reply-to-list as the
default. Why would you participate in a mailing list and not want
replies sent to the... list? Makes no sense.
Interesting
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013, George Sinos wrote:
I was getting soft results with my 24-70mm lens on one body and
excellent results on another. It pointed to either a problem or a
need for fine-tuning the focus. I used the FocusTune software with
good results. Here's is a short description of the
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013, Darren Addy wrote:
This lens is capable of really shallow DOF (and on an APS-C sized
sensor). I don't need no steenkin' full frame. These are just some
quick grab shots taken over my afternoon break.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/sets/72157634554848922
The
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Almost half way through and still going:
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2013/07/leaf-eater.html?m=1
Nice! I would maybe put the focus point a half-inch farther back to get
more of it in focus (and add some foreground bokeh). But you
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't often show misses, but this one's so close I had to
share. Sadly, I missed the focus (see how the guys behind him are
sharp?), but otherwise I think it would have been a fine shot:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, Bruce Walker wrote:
Zos, eyebrows are my litmus test for system sharpness. Get a well-lit
headshot of somebody and examine their eyebrows. You should clearly
see
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, Bruce Walker wrote:
Zos, eyebrows are my litmus test
as well give it another go.
On 7/21/2013 4:18 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
I just got an email from KEH that they are going to be at the Hayward
camera show next weekend, buying and selling gear.
AFAICT, their e-mail only said that they're going to be buying, did I
miss something?
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013, Kenneth Waller wrote:
They don't charge admission when they are in Detroit!
KEH isn't charging admission, they're attending a larger show:
http://photocentral.org/HaywardCameraShow.html
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, Brian Walters wrote:
In Canyon de Chelly, Arizona.
We were there in the middle of the day so it's a bit harsh - you
take the light you're given...
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP1754-K5-1peso.html
The light is no harsher than the
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 10/7/13, Don Guthrie, discombobulated, unleashed:
Recently had an opportunity to photograph a genuine steam engine on the
tracks. I took many pictures and will post some galleries when I get
them up on flicker. Meantime for those who have no
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013, Don Guthrie wrote:
You can't have too much train for trainspotters. In the full gallery
I had some more shots and angles. Send them to:
http://donspix.smugmug.com/Trains/Steam-Train/30556104_RZr3Tm#!i=2636604737k=mMgbFTzlb=1s=A
IMO, this is the best one, you did a good
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013, Zos Xavius wrote:
Yay! No more sensor with dust trapped underneath the filter. No more
unreliable shutter button. Thanks to Joe Wilensky for the timely
delivery and reasonable price. It still amazes me that it was cheaper
to just buy another k-7 than send my beat one
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
That is publication worthy!
Well since you mention it, its from a number of years ago and it
recently made it into the finals for a local contest and I thought
I'd repost it for some of the newbies oldies here,
Congrats! Hope you win (or
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, Bruce Walker wrote:
http://flic.kr/p/f7BHhH Dogwood berries
Tried my new 30 octa umbrella softbox for macro work; I like it.
Reversed the flash to increase specularity and create more of a
spotlight effect.
What do you mean by reverse the flash? (Tried quacking but
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, Walt wrote:
Yeah, it's just flowers. But, I felt like I ought to contribute
something more than questions. So, here's what I thought was the
best of the few shots I took.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/9264340601/
K-5, F501.7, ISO 80, f/8, 1/90 sec,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013, steve harley wrote:
on 2013-07-11 19:47 Aahz Maruch wrote
Congrats! Why not keep the 16-50?
i'm a little torn; i have the 16-45, which is good, if not great,
yet i rarely use it any more; that range is covered for me by a set
of small primes that are excellent
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013, Brian Walters wrote:
As usual, you'll find the gallery here:
http://pug.komkon.org/
Wow, these are all great, thanks for the work! And yeah, if I had to
pick one, it probably would be Looking for a Mate.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
In the future, when I'm photographing a sunset, I'll try to remember
to wait until after I see the color fading before I give up and quit
shooting.
...or at least until your SD card fills up. (Which is what happened to
me with that Endicott Sunset
Agreed!
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013, Boris Liberman wrote:
You're welcome. It is now ever so slightly better ;-).
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Boris Liberman wrote:
Larry it ever so slightly tilts to the left.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, Bruce Walker wrote:
http://flic.kr/p/f7BHhH Dogwood berries
Tried my new 30 octa umbrella softbox for macro work; I like it.
Reversed the flash to increase
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013, steve harley wrote:
on 2013-07-11 19:47 Aahz Maruch wrote
Congrats! Why not keep the 16-50?
i'm a little torn; i have the 16-45, which is good, if not great
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Here is what I wrote previously about my experience with Pentax 17-70/4:
(2 years ago:)
Also, albeit very subjectively (i.e. without quantitative and systematic
tests), I found that 17-70/4 tends to produce somewhat sharper images of
the dancers
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Haven't done much street photography lately:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2013/07/bathurst-station.html?m=1
Street yoga!
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
*
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013, DagT wrote:
I'm not sure if this works, but the PAW is moved to google+ this week, at
least until I get home to update the website:
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-wSJFa08S9tE/Ue2RuaqO1_I/BGA/mzK5KmyLfW0/w811-h543-no/_DT36524-up.jpg
Oh, I look up and see the
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
It would, however, be very tough to give up my in-body image stabilization.
On the other hand, those 39 autofocus points seem very attractive.
Does anyone actually use those multiple autofocus points for live
handheld shooting?
--
Hugs and backrubs
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
Does anyone actually use those multiple autofocus points for live
handheld shooting?
I think it would be a big help for birds in flight. On Pentax bodies,
it's easy for the bird
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:47:17PM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
It would, however, be very tough to give up my in-body image stabilization.
On the other hand, those 39 autofocus points seem very attractive
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 05:25:40PM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
I just can't even visualize the mechanics of manually selecting AF point
for handheld shooting, so I figured I'd ask whether anyone does.
If I have my camera set up on a tripod
Roger Cicala of lensrentals.com talks about silent lens upgrades and
makes a few snarky comments about the blogosphere along the way:
http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2013/07/silent-changes
(Figured this was only semi-OT given the recent discussion about lens
differences.)
--
Hugs and backrubs
...until they've been out a week or three or five:
http://www.sansmirror.com/newsviews/fujifilm-x-pro1-firmware.html
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
* * *
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to
FYI, given your requirement for good wide performance, don't pine too
badly for the 16-50, I noticed a fair amount of vignetting at 16/2.8
Honestly, given how much you care about the difference between 16 and 17,
I think you might prefer something like the Tamron 10-24 or one of the
Sigma 10-20.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013, Darren Addy wrote:
Here is an ingenious Kickstarter that has already raised 3x the number
of $$$ they had as their goal and there is still most of the month
left.
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/lomography/the-lomography-petzval-portrait-lens
Delivery of the first
?) is a
complete non-issue. Even minor barrel distortion isn't worth worrying
about, but especially vignetting.
Unless you just want something to whinge about. In which case, carry on ...
:-)
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
FYI, given your requirement
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013, David Parsons wrote:
I can't imagine that crowdsourcing is capable of raising enough money
to shut down a production line, retool, and make new product.
Might work if they're on the fence about a new lens they're already
thinking of and need to ensure that they have a
lengths.
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 26/07/13 9:33 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
Havne't done any post-processing yet to get a closer look, but the
16-50's 16/2.8 vignetting was clearly visible on casual inspection (i.e.
I wasn't looking for it and was mildly surprised
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I've been shooting for several days no problem...
suddenly instead of getting the nice friendly rear view
that tells me what aperature, speed, etc and lots of choices
i have to adjust things, when I firstturn on the camera
the back lcd view
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013, Joseph McAllister wrote:
Few companies qualify to be shown on How it's Made without showing
you that some part of the product is delivered, except maybe the Swiss
Army Knife and the LeatherMan.
They mine their own iron ore?
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17461377
Looks like a bee bush to me!
More seriously, is that heavily cropped or out-of-focus or what? It
seems a bit fuzzier than the pictures you usually post.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013, John wrote:
I finally gave in to the badgering installed the latest version of
Firefox. Got rid of the nag tab, but it ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE slower
to load anything than the previous version I was using.
One order of magnitude would be ten times slower. Orders plural
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013, John wrote:
On 7/27/2013 12:01 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013, John wrote:
I finally gave in to the badgering installed the latest version of
Firefox. Got rid of the nag tab, but it ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE slower
to load anything than the previous version I
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013, John Francis wrote:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:20:05AM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
You still haven't answered the implied question: are you being literal or
figurative? The only way you could be literally accurate is if there is
something wrong, there's just no way
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013, John Sessoms wrote:
I'm thinking about it. Only a mild intellectual curiosity at the
moment, but if anyone has ideas I'd be interested in hearing them.
Haven't done that (nor seen anyone who has), but I have seen someone
using a Mac virtual machine under Windows, can try
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013, Don Guthrie wrote:
Love the loon. The K-5 just isn't fussy about iso. I often like the
TAV setting where you set the shutter aperture and let the K-5 set
iso wherever it falls.
Seconded, although you can end up with a similar problem if you set the
shutter speed to,
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2013/07/bikes-free-people.html?m=1
...one with every bike!
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
* * *
Help a
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jul 29, 2013, at 10:36 , John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
Half the fun is rounding up the parts, putting them all together
having the damn thing actually work when you finally shoot the power to it.
Have you looked at this guide?
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The problem I was trying to solve is this:
It seems that whenever I respond to PDML messages from the gmail.com
browser interface using the subscriber address gdigio...@gmail.com,
my responses are presented back to me as if the PDML server has
Panasonic G3? m4/3 crop factor is 2x. If Canon G3, it's supposed to
have a 1/1.8 sensor; my Nikon P7100 has a crop factor of 4.67x with a
1/1.7 sensor, so about 4.94x for a Canon G3.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, David J Brooks wrote:
Yes trespassing. This was the G3 so i'm not sure what the zoom
We were talking recently about what would happen if Pentax died, this
answers that pretty well IMO (and his point about used equipment probably
applies squared for Pentax):
http://www.sansmirror.com/newsviews/the-m43-users-are-nervous.html
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
Also not responsible for accidentally posting best moments that you
never wanted anyone else to see.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013, Bruce Walker wrote:
Autographer ensures that the best moments which may have otherwise
been missed are completely captured.
I can't wait to see the small print
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, Charles Robinson wrote:
I set my auto-ISO to 6400 and I'm happy to leave it there. 12800 is
just a bit too rough.
Yes and no. That is, 12800 is too rough for really good large prints;
however, every time I ask myself, Would I rather the camera lock me out
of that shot?
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 7/16/2013 12:19 PM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
And plenty of Photographers + Reviewers said the DA 8-55 Kit lens
wasn't good. What rot, my 18-55 AL II purchased new from Buy com for $
101.99 shipped was a darned good lens with plenty of sharpness, color
and
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013, John Sessoms wrote:
I apologize if this turns out to be a duplicate
Doesn't seem to be for me.
On 7/31/2013 12:03 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:25:37PM +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013, George Sinos wrote:
I bit the bullet and hit the go button on the new smugmug site.
[...]
Here it is http://www.georgesphotos.net
Overall, looks pretty good and clean. I dislike the way text popups are
handled with mouseovers, but I assume that can be changed. Do
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013, George Sinos wrote:
This gallery has full size images
http://www.georgesphotos.net/Events/Sand-in-the-City-2013
Initially the gallery resizes for your screen. Click on the image to
view it in the lightbox. Then you'll see a little symbol that looks
like nested
1 - 100 of 747 matches
Mail list logo
