On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 21:59:15 +0100, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 20, 2006, at 14:44, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Flash lighting? It's a bit unnatural looking. Nice and
interesting otherwise.
Regards, Bob S.
On 12/20/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:59:51 +0100, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 2, 2007, at 8:41 AM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
Which is very, very far from what my education prepared me for...
I wonder how many of us are doing what our education prepared us
for? In my case I majored in
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:12:55 +0100, Frits Wüthrich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 22:08, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:59:51 +0100, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 2, 2007, at 8:41 AM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
Which is very, very far from what my
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:47:11 +0100, David J Brooks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this the lens that seemed to fall apart.
There was talk last year here, about a lens in this more or less focal
lenght, that was a good performer, but the elements tended to seperate.
Was it this one.?? Or
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:03:22 +0100, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Fairweather wrote:
I run a university business school in Kent. I'm attempting to retire
early as the best part of the job has become taking photos for the in
house magazine and the external relations department.
Hi all,
In December I sent two zooms with falling damage (FA 28-105 powerzoom and
F70-210) to Pentax for repair. I promised to report back on the quality of
the service:
The good news is they were fairly fast, exactly one month in the holiday
season. The bad news is the FA will cost more
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 01:32:14 +0100, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
in the LX. Not sure where I read it, but I think the LX screens are
supposed to work, or at least some of them are.
Hi John,
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know, Pentax change
physical screen size
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 21:22:39 +0100, Frits Wüthrich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 11:51, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Hi all,
In December I sent two zooms with falling damage (FA 28-105 powerzoom
and
F70-210) to Pentax for repair. I promised to report back on the quality
Op Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:00:50 +0200 schreef David Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FAJ: KAF mount (crippled), minus aperture simulator aperture ring.
Nope, the FA J 18-35 has an aperture simulator (fixed at f22, of course).
As far as I know (but I admit that's hearsay) the other two FA J's don't
Op Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:00:21 +0200 schreef jtainter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I shoot. So I'd like to have the option to turn shaft drive on and off.
That way I can hear whether or not the lenses focuses.
There used to be a 'focus confirmation beep', at least on the film SLR's.
Is it gone?
--
I shoot. So I'd like to have the option to turn shaft drive on and
off. That way I can hear whether or not the lenses focuses.
There used to be a 'focus confirmation beep', at least on the film
SLR's. Is it gone?
Oh, that is the first thing I turn off on every camera. I would rather
Op Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:09:36 +0100 schreef Lasse Karlsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anybody in the know about how negatives (or for that matter
transparencies)
go together with different kinds of plastic material?
For instance in the past I've noticed that some plastic will stick to
photocopied
Op Fri, 23 Nov 2007 17:39:42 +0100 schreef Thibouille
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm in need of a SuperA handgrip.
If anybody has a spare I'm interested.
Thank you
Hi Thibouille,
I have one (Winder MEII) available in the Netherlands. Yours at shipping
cost if you can live with a defective/taped
Op Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:35:04 +0100 schreef William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Here is a sad survery.
How many Pentax film cameras do you have that you are rarely, if ever,
using?
List by model and number if you like.
Reply in confidence to
warobb at accesscomm.ca
I'll tally them up and
Op Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:52:26 +0100 schreef Polyhead
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Today while at the local goodwill, I scored a Pentax ME Super with a
Pentax-M 50mm f/1.7 lens for $30. The seals and mirror cushon are shot,
does anyone know where i can get a seal kit for this camera? I already
Op Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:56:20 +0100 schreef Walter Hamler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Do I need to use the DA lenses and be able to set aperture.
I just bought a K-1000 bodywith an adapter to fit my telescope so I
can shoot film shots through the scope. Out of curiosity I attached my
10~17 FE and
Op Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:56:04 +0100 schreef Peter Fairweather
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've got one with exactly the same problem. Is their a cure as it's
nice to have a light body with my 12-24mm Sigma? The grip adds too
much weight
Remote control?
--
Ciao, Lucas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hi all,
I just had a roll of Fuji Superia 400 developed (by a Kodak lab, as far as
I know), and it looks odd, to say the least. The film is very dark with a
blue hue, as opposed to the normal orange base color. The lettering on the
side is white-ish, instead of black. I had the impression
Op Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:17:37 +0100 schreef Scott Loveless
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Charles Robinson wrote:
There's a guy here selling a bunch of old equipment (zx-50, 38-80
zoom, and 80-200 zoom) for not-so-much money. Is the 80-200 (a zoom
range I only have covered with my Vivitar Series 1)
Op Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:24:08 +0100 schreef Scott Loveless
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hey, gang. I'm contemplating a portrait lens for the 645. I have no
foreseeable need for the leaf shutter on the 135, and both focal lengths
are acceptable. Plus, the 150 is a bit faster, so I'm leaning towards
at the last moment, they
would be sitting somewhere in a warehouse, with one 'getting lost' after a
while.
Until someone owns up, we'll never know...
Ciao, Lucas
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:28:05 +0100 schreef P. J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's not what it says
Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:36:36 +0100 schreef Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 18/01/08, Cymen Vig, discombobulated, unleashed:
Does anyone have a spare 35mm 1.4x-S rear converter?
never mind that does anyone have a 35mm f1.4 :-)
Leica, Canon, Minolta, Nikon... According to the KMP Pentax just made
Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:33:45 +0100 schreef Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There's a huge Merc dealership at the Brooklands complex just outside
London where my son was having a driving lesson one Sunday. I wondered
amongst the exhibits inside. This is the back end of a 600 limousine. I
like back
. A fast normal hood is missing in the line-up grin
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:36:36 +0100 schreef Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 18/01/08, Cymen Vig, discombobulated, unleashed:
Does anyone have a spare 35mm 1.4x-S rear converter?
never mind that does anyone have a 35mm f1.4
What Adam said. Does nicely at lerger distances as well.
Regards, Lucas
Op Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:00:39 +0100 schreef Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And the similar Tamron SP 90/2.5 macro is superb (if you can find a K
Adaptall mount), so is their 90/2.8 AF Macro.
-Adam
On 1/19/08, Paul
Hi all,
Nice curio: a golden M35/2,8:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=290198190837ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:ITih=019
I assume it did not leave the Pentax factory like this: The KMP does not
list it, and the finish is different from the golden K50/1.2. The seller
could not
Op Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:03:24 +0100 schreef Cymen Vig [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jan 20, 2008 3:41 PM, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice curio: a golden M35/2,8:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=290198190837ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:ITih=019
I assume it did not leave
Op Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:41:50 +0100 schreef William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: cbwaters
Subject: Are they M or F? WAS: Re: New Body vs. New Lens
For me this Begs the question: Are cameras male or female?
I had a discussion a while back with some audio guys
Op Sat, 26 Jan 2008 05:40:50 +0100 schreef Rick Womer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The same shutter was in the PZ-1p, IIRC...
The specs do sound familiar :o)
--
Ciao, Lucas
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't be that much pricier, the Nikon F90x had a
4.5fps 1/8000
shutter with
Op Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:54:23 +0100 schreef Scott Loveless
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Roman Melihhov wrote:
If you could have 4 lenses (already in production or under development)
for your Pentax DSLR. What it would be?
I don't have a DSLR, you insensitive clod. vbg
Otherwise, I'd like the three
Op Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:16:52 +0100 schreef Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DA 21mm/fF3.2AL (what does the AL mean?)
Aspherical.
--
Ciao, Lucas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Op Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:28:52 +0100 schreef Timber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi list!
I would like to ask about the Tamron Adaptall lenses. If anyone has
experience with them I would be interested to hear. Especially which
lens to buy :D
SP90 2,5 Macro. With the A50/1,4 easily my favourite lens.
Op Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:30:40 +0100 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The adapters. Standard K adapter is fine. The KA adapter has a
spotty quality record. One of mine regularly comes undone, despite no
apparent fault. Beware of secondhand ones.
For what it's worth: my
Op Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:36:01 +0100 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/02/19 Tue PM 07:08:17 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Adaptall lenses
Op Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:30:40 +0100 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL
Op Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:38:01 +0100 schreef Walter Hamler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OK. I am clueless.
I put the 18~55 DA lens on the K1000 body thinking it would only work
at WO aperture because it has no aperture simulator. However, when I
actually looked at a slow shutter speed, it appears to
Hi all,
I seem to have accumulated more stuff than I have use for, so I'm offering the
following for sale:
AF500FTZ TTL flash for Pentax AF film camera's, and the *ist-D, -DS and -DS2.
With matching soft case, LN- (as per KEH) condition, €150,-
SMC Pentax 135mm 1:3,5 ('K'-series), with
Hi,
For pictures: http://www.jenny.dds.nl/lucas/FSF/index.html
Thanks, Lucas
Op Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:55:22 +0100 schreef Lucas Rijnders
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I seem to have accumulated more stuff than I have use for, so I'm
offering the following for sale:
AF500FTZ TTL flash
Op Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:56:39 +0100 schreef Charles Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
daughter as a gift, I figure at the very least I could have that be
her standard lens since she loves manual focus and pretty much is
disdainful of autofocus lenses. But if it's a pile of junk I'll just
tell the
Op Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:10:34 +0100 schreef Charles Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mar 17, 2008, at 13:59, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
I like your daughter. Or at least her taste in lenses. Get her an A
50/1,4
and a Super Program. In my experience manual focus is best enjoyed
on a
camera
Op Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:29:11 +0100 schreef Marcus A. Hofmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I really like the first one: you captured the north of the Netherlands
perfectly.
--
Regards, Lucas
Ah, yes, beautiful. I just came back from a week of sailing on the
Ijsselmeer and Waddenzee and I can still
Op Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:38:36 +0200 schreef William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan
Subject: Re: Macro lens conundrum
I visited a neighbor who is a member of the Chicago Corvette Club
yesterday.
He showed us 3 Corvettes in his 2 car garage.
One was
Op Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:56:33 +0200 schreef William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: Lucas Rijnders
Subject: Re: Macro lens conundrum
Collectors are white pipe-smoking males in their fifties. The rest are
retards.
Does it matter what they put in their pipes
Op Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:20:13 +0200 schreef P. J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'd love to optimize my lens collection, unfortunately it seem to have a
life of it's own.
grin
Paul Stenquist wrote:
The D300 may have better high ISO. Some of the testers seem to think
so. Although, again, I
Op Sun, 06 Apr 2008 07:51:48 +0200 schreef Brian Walters
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
and I'm still smiling over Oerang Oetang by Jos van der Hijden
I can't help wondering what Lars thinks of it ;-)
--
Ciao, Lucas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Op Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:26:15 +0200 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Not necessarily. I actually don't think there is a way (within XP) to
make it _open_ Explorer with the folders pane open. You have to go the
If I press the windows button + E on my pc, explorer opens with the
Op Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:51:02 +0200 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:26:15 +0200 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Not necessarily. I actually don't think there is a way (within XP) to
make it _open_ Explorer with the folders pane
Op Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:10:55 +0200 schreef ann sanfedele
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But, hey, I started with a stunning looking teen - makes it easy.
Normally I would agree, with this photo I doubt that's all there is to
it...
--
Regards, Lucas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Op Tue, 08 Apr 2008 05:57:34 +0200 schreef Godfrey DiGiorgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Apr 7, 2008, at 7:17 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
small
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7143990
larger
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7143990size=lg
Very nice.
Anyway, here's the
Op Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:57:54 +0200 schreef Peter McIntosh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
S... What focal length would you take? And why?
My wife puts me on a strict two-lens budget for holidays, so I know your
problem.
On digital I would doubt endlessly between the K24/2,8 (because it's my
Op Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:01:58 +0200 schreef Mark Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I have the K10D set to capture in PEF format. When I import to
Lightroom, I have it convert to DNG on the fly directly from card to
computer hard drive, and make
Op Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:10:04 +0200 schreef Charles Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Apr 8, 2008, at 13:59, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:57:54 +0200 schreef Peter McIntosh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
S... What focal length would you take? And why?
My wife puts me on a strict two
Op Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:25:24 +0200 schreef Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 8/4/08, Lucas Rijnders, discombobulated, unleashed:
My wife puts me on a strict two-lens budget for holidays
Mark!
Ehm, I would prefer not to have this in the quotes list, if you don't
mind...
Besides, it's not a bad
Op Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:00:13 +0200 schreef Godfrey DiGiorgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sometimes, limitations and a lack of equipment choices to distract us
begets more creativity and better photographs. I still often carry
just one prime lens when I'm out shooting.
Agreed. I even find that if I do
Op Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:00:54 +0200 schreef Scott Loveless
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:25:24 +0200 schreef Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 8/4/08, Lucas Rijnders, discombobulated, unleashed:
My wife puts me on a strict two-lens budget for holidays
Mark
Op Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:42:57 +0200 schreef Charles Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Apr 9, 2008, at 7:05, Henk Terhell wrote:
I agree that there is tons to learn to use it properly. I've been
playing around with it for the past week and I've just barely
scratched the surface. There are a
Op Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:36:27 +0200 schreef Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And, while more or less on the subject, is there a way to edit 'maker
notes', especially lens name in the exif? If a shot is by an 'A series
Op Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:05:59 +0200 schreef Jos from Holland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One lens only? I would take the widest I have: the 18-55 kitlens, I can
always crop later but never expend! Missing an opportunity is much
worse for me than not having the best optical quality
Greetz, Jos
On
Op Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:57:57 +0200 schreef Godfrey DiGiorgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
it such that Lightroom will recognize it. Lightroom recognizes all
Pentax lenses properly now, far as I can tell, given the data that is
available.
I obviously use another class of lenses than you do: My SMC
Op Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:43:22 +0200 schreef P. J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
record keeping became a general to about 1910 statistics show that young
women were very vulnerable to typhus, cholera, child birth, small pox it
Young women are still quite vulnerable to child birth ;-)
--
Ciao,
Op Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:33:53 +0200 schreef Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bingo...or if someone who is allegedly an astute critic has given it
a gushing review, a portion of the masses will give it a me too.
I have heard art defined as 'what critics call art'. I didn't bother to
remember
You don't believe in the decicive moment, I take it?
Regards, Lucas.
Op Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:52:14 +0200 schreef J. C. O'Connell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ALL LENSES METER ON ALL DSLRS, JUST SHOOT AND ADJUST TILL YOU GET A GOOD
HISTO.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lucas Rijnders
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 3:15 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: full frame rumours and innuendo
You don't believe in the decicive moment, I take it?
Regards, Lucas.
Op Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:52:14 +0200 schreef J. C
guess...
Regards, Lucas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lucas Rijnders
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 1:45 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: full frame rumours and innuendo
Op Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:36:14 +0200 schreef J. C
Op Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:18:17 +0200 schreef Brian Walters
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes,
I have an old Exa (downmarket version of the Exacta) with the left
handed shutter release. It's not very intuitive if you're used to the
right handed release, and I often wondered why Ihagee designed their
Op Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:35:15 +0200 schreef Luka Knezevic-Strika
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
try comparing [EMAIL PROTECTED] and fa 50 1.4 field of view. you'll be
surprised
Photodo.com has (or used to have) tested focal lengths: Pentax AF 50's
were actally 52mm. I would guess the 16-50 would stop
Op Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:31:18 +0200 schreef Manuel Magalhães
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A Funny thing is happening to my posts. You can see them but I can't. I
only
see your replies. I checked my settings and everything appears to be
fine.
Can someone help me please.
Maybe you blacklisted
with several others...
Good luck,
Lucas
I Would if I only knew how to. ;) But I still don't get my posts guys.
Come
on! On the other hand this can be a sign...
Manuel
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Lucas
Rijnders
Enviada: segunda
Hey Bob,
You take three camera's and no lenses?
Prime:
K 15/3.5
A 15/3.5
A 16/2.8
K 17/4
K 18/3.5
A 20/2.8
FA 20/2.8
K 20/4
M 20/4
FA* 24/2
K 24/2.8
A 24/2.8
K 24/3.5
K 28/2
M 28/2
A 28/2
M 28/2.8
M 28/2.8
A 28/2.8
F 28/2.8
FA 28/2.8
FA 28/2.8
K 28/3.5
K 28/3.5
M 28/3.5
K 30/2.8
FA 31/1.8
K 35/2
No discussions about brands here: my wife adopted a 'rear lens cap' I got
though ebay.
My only complaint is that she calls _my_ A50/1,4 'her lens'. If I recall
correctly the very lens I bought the lot with her camera for! See
http:\\www.jenny.dds.nl\lucas\PDML\Jenny-0933.jpg for a snap...
Op Mon, 05 May 2008 22:09:22 +0200 schreef Katrin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Pentax film body recommendations:
As said, the MZ-S and LX keep their value: the first is rare, the second a
legend. Probably not the best buys.
If you like the dual control wheel set-up of the high-end digital cameras
get
Op Tue, 06 May 2008 07:41:08 +0200 schreef Godfrey DiGiorgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On May 5, 2008, at 7:50 PM, Jan Moren wrote:
Brings me to a question I've been meaning to ask: what does it entail
today to actually use a 645 film camera? I've been on the fence on
getting one for a long time
Op Tue, 06 May 2008 16:39:26 +0200 schreef Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 5, 2008, at 7:13 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
I much prefer the LX viewfinder as well. I hated the F3 viewfinder.
It was one of the reasons I
Op Mon, 05 May 2008 18:31:39 +0200 schreef P. J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oh, dear; I suppose it would be frightfully difficult to maintain
civilization, without a proper supply of tea.
Histry suggests if you want to build and keep an empire, you need tea.
Worked for the british and the
Op Tue, 06 May 2008 08:37:52 +0200 schreef Thibouille
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There was a test on DPR I will try to find back comparing DA*300,
DA55-300 and Tamron 70-300.
DA* is superb of course but the 55-300 holds its own pretty well even
at 300mm. The Tammy shows sooo much CA it is
Op Tue, 06 May 2008 23:07:29 +0200 schreef Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hand-drafting?'. Well, personally I can draft on the computer and use
paint programs quite handily, but I enjoy drafting out a plan by hand
or spending a few hours painting. And yes, it's nice to load pictures
from my
Op Tue, 06 May 2008 22:36:19 +0200 schreef Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 6, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Take a static subject, put your eye to the finder and let it roam
around
until you're
Op Wed, 14 May 2008 18:20:42 +0200 schreef P. J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I do like the transformer camera further down the page, though :o)
Well lets see, they stole the picture of another manufactures prototype
to represent the new product, and claimed it would be compatible with
Leica
Op Thu, 15 May 2008 15:14:37 +0200 schreef William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille
Subject: Re: Microsoft and Hoya Pentax join forces.
PEF should be displayed as soon as you install the PEF codec which is
linked from Microsoft's own website.
As of
Op Fri, 16 May 2008 02:12:42 +0200 schreef William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: Lucas Rijnders
Subject: Re: Microsoft and Hoya Pentax join forces.
Don't bet on it: There appears to be a bit of a row between Adobe and
Microsoft. At work I have a Vista 64 bit
Op Tue, 20 May 2008 02:50:58 +0200 schreef Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Note that both the Pentax AF540FGZ and AF360FGZ offer Auto flash as
well as P-TTL, digital TTL and analog TTL support.
Hey, that's 'new' on the AF-540 over the AF-500? Or did I miss the
Auto-flash function on the AF-500?
Hi all,
I am currently working on a fun project: a friend of mine is studying for
interior designer. Her current assignment is 'Photo styling' where, among
other things, she has to style six photo's (four product shots, two
supporting shots) and have them taken by an unpaid photographer.
:) :)
Aargh! Just what I did not need to know. I would love a good flash useable
on a SuperA, 645 and K10... I would love a better wideangle than the FAJ
18-35 as well...
Regards, Lucas
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Op Tue, 20 May 2008 02:50:58 +0200
Op Wed, 21 May 2008 14:42:54 +0200 schreef Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Op Tue, 20 May 2008 22:30:52 +0200 schreef Thibouille
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is no Auto flash on 330/500.
Pity, I really like that flash
Op Wed, 21 May 2008 11:38:02 +0200 schreef Thibouille
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aargh! Just what I did not need to know. I would love a good flash
useable
on a SuperA, 645 and K10... I would love a better wideangle than the FAJ
18-35 as well...
Regards, Lucas
Hehe :) I can testify it works
Op Wed, 21 May 2008 01:05:39 +0200 schreef Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Doug Franklin wrote:
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Her current assignment is 'Photo styling' where, among
other things, she has to style six photo's [...]
Uh, excuse my ignorance, but I've never seen the word style used
Op Tue, 20 May 2008 23:34:19 +0200 schreef frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently working on a fun project: a friend of mine is studying
for
interior designer. Her current assignment is 'Photo
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lucas Rijnders
Sent: 20 May 2008 21:39
To: PDML
Subject: GESO: Orange Peel
Hi all,
I am currently working on a fun project: a friend of mine is
studying for
interior designer. Her current assignment is 'Photo styling'
where
/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GESO: Orange Peel
Hi all,
I am currently working on a fun project: a friend of mine is studying
for
interior designer. Her current assignment is 'Photo styling' where,
among
other things, she has
Op Thu, 22 May 2008 16:18:01 +0200 schreef Charles Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On May 21, 2008, at 15:21, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
I was actually doubting between the 12-24 and the 16-14. I really
liked
the ultra wide 18 to 24mm perspective on film. The 16-45 would give
me the
angle of view
about a picture being too effing warm.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lucas Rijnders
Sent: 21 May 2008 21:43
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: GESO: Orange Peel
Op Tue, 20 May 2008 23:33:51 +0200 schreef Bob W
[EMAIL
Op Thu, 22 May 2008 12:15:59 +0200 schreef Thibouille
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I know I should get a 645 but in Europe, used prices aren't as nice as
in the US :(
I'd really like to get hold of one however.
I bought mine (with 120 holder lens) in the US through ebay under
€200,-. The 150/3,5
Op Thu, 22 May 2008 21:48:30 +0200 schreef Scott Loveless
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hey, gang!
Does anyone know of a site similar to Bojidar's or Stan's for the 645?
I've looked around a bit and am assuming that it doesn't exist. But if
you know of one I'd love a link.
Thanks!
I do have a
Op Sun, 25 May 2008 18:52:23 +0200 schreef Mark Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's why I have an MZ-S camera strap on my camera: It has pockets, one
on each side, to hold spare items. The intended contents are an IR
They are great for not loosing your hotshoe cover as well :o)
--
Ciao,
Op Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:52:43 +0200 schreef P. J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Interesting, the lens contains not one but two composite, aspherical
elements, the composite aspherical element was the achillies heel of the
smcp FA 28-70mm f4.0 an otherwise exemplary little lens.
Dario Bonazza
-manufactured
copy, for about what the price of repair would have been.
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:52:43 +0200 schreef P. J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Interesting, the lens contains not one but two composite, aspherical
elements, the composite aspherical element was the achillies
Op Mon, 16 Jun 2008 02:24:29 +0200 schreef Ken Waller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You may find jogging more efficient than cycling.
As far as loosing weight you're absolutely right!
Do this for several years you might be eligible for a couple of new
knees!
Yes. Run on unhardened roads, if you
Op Mon, 16 Jun 2008 02:50:25 +0200 schreef Mark Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Heck, if Pentax made a 10MP camera the size of the ist-D or DS I'd be
quite interested.
Is the K-200D that much larger?
--
Ciao, Lucas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Op Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:55:22 +0200 schreef AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think with all Pentax AF SLRS, the mirror is semi-translucent, and
with a second mirror behind it to divert light to AF sensors located
in the mirror house floor.
I may have misunderstood this completely, though... :-)
, so I'm
with Mark and Feranando.
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Mon, 16 Jun 2008 02:50:25 +0200 schreef Mark Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Heck, if Pentax made a 10MP camera the size of the ist-D or DS I'd be
quite interested.
Is the K-200D that much larger?
--
Ciao, Lucas
--
PDML Pentax
Op Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:12:28 +0200 schreef Godfrey DiGiorgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Do you believe everything you read on the internet? ]'-)
Certainly.
On Jun 18, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Fernando wrote:
I read in dpreview that Pentax can't do sports :oP
On 6/18/08, Scott Loveless [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 573 matches
Mail list logo