.
From: Benjamin Udell [mailto:bud...@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: 4-May-14 8:51 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of Science
Gary F, Frankin, Jeff K, Jeffrey D, list,
Actually I said that I didn't think that the method of opinion
List,
Reading through the posts, I've noticed that no one has mentioned the fifth
method Peirce identified. Quoting from Liszka's *A General Introduction to
the Semeiotic of Charles S. Peirce*:
In this last case, authority must give way to the method of public
opinion. In this method, the fixing
Professor
Department of Philosophy
NAU
(o) 523-8354
From: Gary Richmond [gary.richm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2014 1:06 PM
To: Kasser,Jeff
Cc: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of Science
methods.”
gary f.
From: Frank Ransom [mailto:pragmaticist.lo...@gmail.com]
Sent: 4-May-14 3:42 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Cc: Frank Ransom
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of Science
List,
Reading through the posts, I've noticed that no one has
@list.iupui.edu
Subject: RE: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of Science
Thanks, Jeffrey. This is useful, and I think you and Smyth capture something
important about Fixation. But I follow Short in thinking that Smyth's
interpretation leaves out something essential
in inquiry I don't know.
Cathy
-Original Message-
From: Kasser,Jeff [mailto:jeff.kas...@colostate.edu]
Sent: Monday, 28 April 2014 4:40 a.m.
Cc: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: RE: Fwd: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of
Science
I agree with everything you say
Welcome back, Cathy!
Your classification of the four methods of fixing belief describes the A
Priori Method as private, reasoned. But as Peirce describes it (EP1:118-19),
it is no more private than the method of Authority; indeed it is more public,
in that it recognizes a broader range of
Gary, Cathy, list,
So, slightly modifying Cathy's list in consideration of Gary F's comments
we get (and, personally, with an eye to introducing these methods to
students):
*Method of Tenacity: private, randomMethod of Authority: public,
randomMethod of Consensus: public, reasonedMethod of
Gary R. Gary F Cathy,
Very nice. I'm saving this somewhere that i won't lose it.
Phyllis
Gary Richmond gary.richm...@gmail.com wrote:
Gary, Cathy, list,
So, slightly modifying Cathy's list in consideration of Gary F's comments
we get (and, personally, with an eye to introducing these methods
Hi Mara,
You've asked: What role did Peirce think that science (as he defined science)
should play in the development of religious thought?
I don't believe that Peirce tried to answer this question in How to Make Our
Ideas Clear. We could look to the broader context of his other
: Gary Richmond [gary.richm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 3:28 PM
To: Kasser,Jeff
Cc: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of
Science
Jeff, Jeffrey, List,
I want to take a stab at your second question concerning
From: Kasser,Jeff
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 10:23 AM
To: Jeffrey Brian Downard
Subject: RE: Fwd: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of
Science
Hi Jeffrey, et al. Roberts is certainly a nominalist about laws, though my
former
]
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 10:00 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: RE: Fwd: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy
of Science
Hi Jeffrey and other Peircers. Your question about the foundations of
measurement is above my pay grade, I'm sorry to say. Do I remember
: Sungchul Ji [mailto:s...@rci.rutgers.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 7:41 AM
To: Jeffrey Brian Downard
Cc: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: RE: Fwd: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of
Science
Hi,
Speaking about measurement, my students and I at Rutgers have found
something
From: Kasser,Jeff [jeff.kas...@colostate.edu]
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 10:00 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: RE: Fwd: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of
Science
Hi Jeffrey and other Peircers. Your question about the foundations of
measurement is above my
.
From: Jeffrey Brian Downard [jeffrey.down...@nau.edu]
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 11:14 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: RE: Fwd: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy
of Science
List,
I'd like to ask another question about the topic of chapter 6
.
From: Jeffrey Brian Downard [jeffrey.down...@nau.edu]
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 11:14 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: RE: Fwd: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of
Science
List,
I'd like to ask another question about the topic of chapter 6
o~o~o~o~o~o
Where number is irrelevant, regimented mathematical technique has hitherto tended to be lacking.
Thus it is that the progress of natural science has depended so largely upon the discernment of
measurable quantity of one sort or another.
List,
I'd like to ask another question about the topic of chapter 6. This question
is not about the Fixation of Belief. Rather, it is about a part of the
philosophy of science that does not figure prominently in Kees's discussion.
In the first half of the 20th century, a methodological
of Philosophy
NAU
(o) 523-8354
From: Benjamin Udell [bud...@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 8:46 AM
To:peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of
Science
Jeffrey, Sam, Jeff K., list
...@nyc.rr.com
]
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 8:46 AM
To:peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of
Science
Jeffrey, Sam, Jeff K., list,
-
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on Reply List or Reply All to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
predecessor in particular: Herder.
Best
Søren
Fra: Jerry LR Chandler [mailto:jerry_lr_chand...@me.com]
Sendt: 15. april 2014 04:30
Til: Benjamin Udell
Cc: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Emne: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of Science
8:46 AM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of
Science
Jeffrey, Sam, Jeff K., list,
-
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on Reply List or Reply All to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should
Ben, List
On Apr 14, 2014, at 8:06 PM, Benjamin Udell wrote:
He mentions Schleiermacher a few times in passing.
Would you be so kind as to post the references to Schleiermacher?
He played a critical role in the trio of students (with Schelling and a poet
whose name I forget,) who moved
Jerry, list,
I wonder whether there was more than one Schleiermacher. Or did
Schleiermacher start out in theology? Or maybe Peirce was in some sort
of error or insufficient information about Schleiermacher in the first
quote below. Anyway, here are the results. In the third quote, Peirce
Ben, List
Thanks for citations. I will study them in some detail and from several
perspectives. Very important to me.
On Apr 14, 2014, at 9:10 PM, Benjamin Udell wrote:
Or did Schleiermacher start out in theology?
Yes, the three theology students studied at Tubingen together in the early
Jerry, list,
Well, that's cleared up about Schleiermacher's pursuits. And the second
quote needs to be read with a bit of care; it took me a re-reading to
notice that Peirce didn't say that Schleiermacher treated a special
metaphysics as prior to logic, in 'a vicious order of thought'; Peirce
Thanks for your interesting comments. I just posted the link on a
whim.
At 08:45 PM 2014-04-11, Benjamin Udell wrote:
Dear John, list,
Thank you, John. That's an interesting article, I'm glad I read it. I'm
reminded of a book about Tausk and Freud that I read when I was young; it
was called
...@usm.edu]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:03 PM
To: Benjamin Udell; peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: RE: Fwd: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal
Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of Science
Ben, Jeff, Jeffrey, List,
I appreciate Bens reconstruction and
interpretive remarks thanks. With regards
Charles Morris was a performing magician in his youth -- Max Fisch brought this
to my attention in 1983 when I was researching Morris's papers at the Peirce
project. Morris has an elaborate album with his ad's and reports of his
performances, etc. As his miserable editing of Mead's ms's show,
, April 10, 2014 2:03 PM
To: Benjamin Udell; peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: RE: Fwd: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of
Science
Ben, Jeff, Jeffrey, List,
I appreciate Ben’s reconstruction and interpretive remarks – thanks.
With regards to Jeff’s question about
Harold, list,
To be sure, I never heard of any magicians continually claiming that
magicians generally have greater _/general/_ intelligence than their
audiences. Well, currently, I don't know any magicians. On the other
hand, the magician whom I knew was a 'magician's magician' famous (for
, April 10, 2014 2:03 PM
To: Benjamin Udell; peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: RE: Fwd: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of
Science
Ben, Jeff, Jeffrey, List,
I appreciate Ben’s reconstruction and interpretive remarks – thanks.
With regards to Jeff’s question about
List,
In addition to joining Jeff K. in looking forward to the prospect of bouncing
ideas off each other as we explore this chapter of the ’ Guide for the
Perplexed, I’d like to start by saying that I found his introductory remarks
about “The Fixation of Belief” clear and to the point.
For
. -- Sam
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Brian Downard [mailto:jeffrey.down...@nau.edu]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 2:12 PM
Cc: Peirce List
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of Science
List,
In addition to joining Jeff K. in looking forward to the prospect
Message-
From: Jeffrey Brian Downard [mailto:jeffrey.down...@nau.edu]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 2:12 PM
Cc: Peirce List
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] RE: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 6, Philosophy of Science
List,
In addition to joining Jeff K. in looking forward to the prospect of bouncing
ideas off each
36 matches
Mail list logo
