On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com writes:
In the function where it is used, it seems to me that it is setting DateStyle
as ISO if it is not ISO and function configure_remote_session() will set it
to ISO initially. So
Hi,
On 04/02/14 12:38, Fujii Masao wrote:
ISTM that the phrase Request queue is not used much around the lock.
Using the phrase wait queue or Simon's suggestion sound better to at least
me.
Thought?
Sounds reasonable to me. Attached patch changes messages to the following:
Process holding
On 2014-02-03 17:51:20 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-02-01 19:47:29 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
Here are the results of a benchmark on Nathan Boley's 64-core, 4
socket server:
On 4th February 2014, Christian kruse Wrote:
On 04/02/14 12:38, Fujii Masao wrote:
ISTM that the phrase Request queue is not used much around the lock.
Using the phrase wait queue or Simon's suggestion sound better to
at least me.
Thought?
Sounds reasonable to me. Attached patch
Hi,
On 2014-02-04 10:23:14 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes:
Please find attached a patch implementing lsn as a datatype, based on
the one Robert wrote a couple of years ago.
On 2014-02-04 02:10:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com writes:
In the function where it is used, it seems to me that it is setting
DateStyle
as ISO if it is not ISO and function configure_remote_session() will set it
to ISO initially. So basically even if the
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
+ /*--
+ * Relational operators for LSNs
+ *-*/
Isn't it just operators? They aren't really
On 2014-02-04 19:17:51 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
+ /*--
+ * Relational operators for LSNs
+
I'm sorry, I'm replying to an older mail, because I lost your latest mail by
mistake.
Ah. Sorry, I missed that part. As NTFS junctions and symbolic links are
different (although they behave similarly), there seems only a minor
inconvenience related to misleading error message i.e.
You are
From: Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com
I completely agree; just saying that any installer can set the key.
I'm convinced that setting this flag is appropriate, at least while Pg
relies on having the shared memory segment mapped in the same zone in
every executable. Just pointing out that
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Allowing ALTER COLUMN SET STORAGE on foreign tables would make sense if for
example, SELECT * INTO local_table FROM foreign_table did create a new
local table of columns having the storage types associated with
On 02/04/2014 07:28 PM, MauMau wrote:
Please don't mind, I didn't misunderstand your intent. I think we
should apply this in the next minor release to avoid unnecessary
confusion -- more new users would use PostgreSQL on Windows 8/2012 and
hit this problem.
I added this patch to the
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-02-04 19:17:51 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
@@ -180,7 +175,7 @@ pg_get_replication_slots(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
else
nulls[i++] = true;
if (restart_lsn !=
On 2014-02-04 21:04:13 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-02-04 19:17:51 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
@@ -180,7 +175,7 @@ pg_get_replication_slots(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
else
On 2014-02-04 00:38:19 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
A quick hack (attached) making BufferDescriptor 64byte aligned indeed
restored performance across all max_connections settings. It's not
surprising that a misaligned buffer descriptor causes problems -
there'll be plenty of false
Hi,
I recently had the need to bury the used isolation level in the
connection string, but it turns out that doesn't work that well...
PGOPTIONS='-c default_transaction_isolation=serializable' \
psql ... -c SHOW default_transaction_isolation
works well enough, but
PGOPTIONS='-c
Tom Lane wrote:
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp writes:
Hello, I have often seen inquiries about an log message from
PostgreSQL server.
LOG: could not create IPv6 socket: Address family not supported by
protocol
That's merely a harmless log message.
If we're
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp writes:
Hello, I have often seen inquiries about an log message from
PostgreSQL server.
LOG: could not create IPv6 socket: Address family not supported by protocol
That's
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-02-04 02:10:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Meh. It might be that the DateStyle usage in postgres_fdw would
accidentally fail to malfunction if it saw a bogus value of the variable.
But it's hard to believe that this would be true of
On 02/04/2014 10:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-02-04 02:10:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Meh. It might be that the DateStyle usage in postgres_fdw would
accidentally fail to malfunction if it saw a bogus value of the variable.
But it's hard to
Re: To Tom Lane 2014-01-08 20140108094017.ga20...@msgid.df7cb.de
What about this patch to mention this gotcha more explicitely in the
documentation?
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/datatype.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/datatype.sgml
new file mode 100644
index 0386330..968f4a7
***
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
PGOPTIONS='-c default_transaction_isolation=serializable' \
psql ... -c SHOW default_transaction_isolation
works well enough, but
PGOPTIONS='-c default_transaction_isolation=repeatable read' \
psql ... -c SHOW default_transaction_isolation
On February 4, 2014 5:06:52 PM CET, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 02/04/2014 10:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-02-04 02:10:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Meh. It might be that the DateStyle usage in postgres_fdw would
accidentally fail
CentOS Release 6.5 (final)
AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core
2.6.32-431.3.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jan 3 21:39:27 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux
memory: 8GB
I am testing nested hstore, on a server with both with these patches:
jsonb-9.patch.gz
nested-hstore-9.patch.gz
One of the first
On 2014-02-04 11:36:22 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
PGOPTIONS='-c default_transaction_isolation=serializable' \
psql ... -c SHOW default_transaction_isolation
works well enough, but
PGOPTIONS='-c default_transaction_isolation=repeatable read' \
On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:06 AM, Sergey Muraviov sergey.k.murav...@gmail.com
wrote:
Now it looks fine for me.
Just as another data point, I recently submitted pgTAP to the Homebrew project
This is the build-from-source system for OS X, used by a lot of web developers.
In my build script, I
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-02-04 11:36:22 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
-1. This is not a general solution to the problem. There are other
GUCs for which people might want spaces in the value.
Sure, I didn't say it was. But I don't see any oother values that are
likely
On 02/04/2014 11:30 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
We have details on how to build with Mingw/Msys on Windows on an Amazon
VM http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Building_With_MinGW which is
either
free or very cheap. Do I need to give instructions on how to do this
for
MSVC builds too? It's really
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
If someone volunteered to pay for the storage, I'd be prepared to make
some time to create an AMI to reduce the startup time dramatically.
Basically it would be boot the AMI and start testing your patches. I'd
even make it as friendly as possible
On 02/04/2014 09:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
If someone volunteered to pay for the storage, I'd be prepared to make
some time to create an AMI to reduce the startup time dramatically.
Basically it would be boot the AMI and start testing your patches. I'd
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 02/04/2014 10:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Ugh. This problem was bad enough when I thought that it would only lead
to link-time errors detectable in the buildfarm. If it can lead to errors
only observable at runtime
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
Now there is approximately 1.4~5% CPU gain for
hundred tiny fields, half nulled case
I don't want to advocate too strongly for this patch because, number
one, Amit is a colleague and more importantly, number two, I
Hi,
On 04/02/14 17:41, Erik Rijkers wrote:
2014-02-04 10:34:25.376 CET 29133 LOG: server process (PID 29459) was
terminated by signal 9: Killed
Did you check if this was the OOM killer? Should be logged in dmesg.
Best regards,
--
Christian Kruse http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
On Tue, February 4, 2014 18:56, Christian Kruse wrote:
Hi,
On 04/02/14 17:41, Erik Rijkers wrote:
2014-02-04 10:34:25.376 CET 29133 LOG: server process (PID 29459) was
terminated by signal 9: Killed
Did you check if this was the OOM killer? Should be logged in dmesg.
I would be
Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com writes:
On 02/04/2014 09:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
My own opinion is that I've already wasted untold man-hours thanks to
the random porting problems induced by Windows, a platform that I never
have and never will care about personally. I will *not* spend my
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 01:28:38PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
Meanwhile, in friendlier cases, like one short and one long field, no
change, we're seeing big improvements. That particular case shows a
speedup of 21% and a WAL reduction of 36%. That's a pretty big deal,
and I think not
On 2014-02-04 14:09:57 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 01:28:38PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
Meanwhile, in friendlier cases, like one short and one long field, no
change, we're seeing big improvements. That particular case shows a
speedup of 21% and a WAL reduction of
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 10:50 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 14.04.2011 10:15, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
I have a problem with PQputCopyData function. It doesn't signal some error.
while ((row = mysql_fetch_row(res)) != NULL)
{
Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl writes:
On Tue, February 4, 2014 18:56, Christian Kruse wrote:
Did you check if this was the OOM killer? Should be logged in dmesg.
I would be surprised if it wasn't. (no access to that machine at the moment)
How do we regard such crashes? It seems to me this was
On 02/04/2014 10:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com writes:
On 02/04/2014 09:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
My own opinion is that I've already wasted untold man-hours thanks to
the random porting problems induced by Windows, a platform that I never
have and never will care
On 02/04/2014 01:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com writes:
On 02/04/2014 09:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
My own opinion is that I've already wasted untold man-hours thanks to
the random porting problems induced by Windows, a platform that I never
have and never will care
* Erik Rijkers (e...@xs4all.nl) wrote:
On Tue, February 4, 2014 18:56, Christian Kruse wrote:
On 04/02/14 17:41, Erik Rijkers wrote:
2014-02-04 10:34:25.376 CET 29133 LOG: server process (PID 29459) was
terminated by signal 9: Killed
Did you check if this was the OOM killer? Should be
Jeff Davis pg...@j-davis.com writes:
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 10:50 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
I think you'll need to send all the data and finish the COPY until you
get an error. If you have a lot of data to send, you might want to slice
it into multiple COPY statements of say 50MB each,
Hi,
I'm doing some benchmarks regarding this problem: one set with
baseline and one set with your patch. Machine was a 32 core machine (4
CPUs with 8 cores), 252 gib RAM. Both versions have the type align
patch applied. pgbench-tools config:
SCALES=100
SETCLIENTS=1 4 8 16 32 48 64 96 128
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Christian Kruse
christ...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I'm doing some benchmarks regarding this problem: one set with
baseline and one set with your patch. Machine was a 32 core machine (4
CPUs with 8 cores), 252 gib RAM. Both versions have the type align
patch
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Christian Kruse
christ...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I added -M prepared to the pgbench call in the benchwarmer script.
The read-only tests are finished, I come to similiar results as yours:
http://wwwtech.de/pg/benchmarks-lwlock-read-only/
Note that Christian
On 2014-02-04 11:48:14 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Christian Kruse
christ...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I added -M prepared to the pgbench call in the benchwarmer script.
The read-only tests are finished, I come to similiar results as yours:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I think he has applied the patch to hack around the alignment issue I
pushed to git for both branches. It's not nice enough to be applied yet,
but it should fix the issue.
I think the 201 is just a remembrance of
On 02/04/2014 11:17 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
prepared to declare the entire damn thing no longer supported.
Although that is obviously your prerogative it is important to remember
that Windows is easily the second most used version of PostgreSQL out
there (behind Linux).
[ shrug... ] If
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Christian Kruse
christ...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I'm doing some benchmarks regarding this problem: one set with
baseline and one set with your patch. Machine was a 32 core machine (4
CPUs with 8 cores), 252 gib RAM.
What CPU model? Can you post /proc/cpuinfo?
On February 4, 2014 8:53:36 PM CET, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
I think he has applied the patch to hack around the alignment issue I
pushed to git for both branches. It's not nice enough to be applied
yet,
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 02/04/2014 11:30 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
We have details on how to build with Mingw/Msys on Windows on an Amazon
VM http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Building_With_MinGW which is
either
free or very cheap. Do I
Hi,
On 04/02/14 12:02, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Christian Kruse
christ...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I'm doing some benchmarks regarding this problem: one set with
baseline and one set with your patch. Machine was a 32 core machine (4
CPUs with 8 cores), 252 gib
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
If someone volunteered to pay for the storage, I'd be prepared to make
some time to create an AMI to reduce the startup time dramatically.
Basically it would be boot the AMI and start
Perhaps this type should be called pglsn, since it's an
implementation-specific detail and not a universal concept like int,
point, or uuid.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
I wonder if these standalone things are really worthwhile.
I wonder how difficult it would be to make sufficient link data available
when
Hi,
On 04/02/14 21:03, Andres Freund wrote:
Christian, could you rerun with master (the commit on which the
branch is based on), the alignment patch, and then the lwlock patch?
Best with max_connections 200. That's probably more important than
the write tests as a first step..
Ok, benchmark
On 02/04/2014 03:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
Do you know about what it would cost? Could official community funds
be used for it (it seems like something that is cheap, but which you
wouldn't want to be forgotten about some month.)
Having an AMI would help, but even with an AMI in place,
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Alexander Korotkov
aekorot...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Christian Kruse
christ...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Ok, benchmark for baseline+alignment patch is running.
I see that you have enabled latency information. For this kind of
thing I prefer to hack pgbench-tools to not collect this (i.e. to not
pass the -l flag,
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 08:11:18PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-02-04 14:09:57 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 01:28:38PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
Meanwhile, in friendlier cases, like one short and one long field, no
change, we're seeing big improvements. That
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Does this feature relate to compression of WAL page images at all?
No.
So the obvious question is: where, if anywhere, do the two efforts
(this patch, and Fujii's patch) overlap? Does Fujii have any concerns
about
On February 4, 2014 10:50:10 PM CET, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Does this feature relate to compression of WAL page images at all?
No.
So the obvious question is: where, if anywhere, do the two efforts
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I think there's zero overlap. They're completely complimentary features. It's
not like normal WAL records have an irrelevant volume.
I'd have thought so too, but I would not like to assume. Like many
people commenting
On 02/03/2014 07:27 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-02-03 09:22:52 -0600, Merlin Moncure wrote:
I lost my stomach (or maybe it was the glass of red) somewhere in the
middle, but I think this needs a lot of work. Especially the io code
doesn't seem ready to me. I'd consider ripping out the
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Oskari Saarenmaa o...@ohmu.fi wrote:
09.01.2014 05:15, Peter Eisentraut kirjoitti:
pg_upgrade creates a script analyze_new_cluster.{sh|bat} that runs
vacuumdb --analyze-only in three stages with different statistics target
settings to get a fresh cluster
The attached patch replaces the existing siftup method for heapify with
a siftdown method. Tested with random integers it does 18% fewer
compares and takes 10% less time for the heapify, over the work_mem
range 1024 to 1048576.
Both algorithms appear to be O(n) (contradicting Wikipedia's claim
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
You know, I would really prefer to just stick a PGDLLIMPORT on this
place and any others that need it, and any others that come up, than
turn this into a political football. Having to sprinkle PGDLLIMPORT
on the handful of variables that are accessed
On 2014-02-04 13:42:51 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Christian Kruse
christ...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Ok, benchmark for baseline+alignment patch is running.
I see that you have enabled latency information. For this kind of
thing I prefer to hack
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 02/04/2014 03:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
Having an AMI would help, but even with an AMI in place, MinGW is
still insanely slow. Running make on already made PostgreSQL (so
there was nothing to actually do) takes 1.5 minutes. And a make after
a
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Which imo means fixing this got more important...
I strongly agree.
--
Peter Geoghegan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On 02/04/2014 05:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 02/04/2014 03:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
Having an AMI would help, but even with an AMI in place, MinGW is
still insanely slow. Running make on already made PostgreSQL (so
there was nothing to actually do)
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Perhaps this type should be called pglsn, since it's an
implementation-specific detail and not a universal concept like int,
point, or uuid.
It makes sense. I'll update the patches according to that.
--
Michael
--
Sent
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I've also had some further thoughts about the right way to drive
vacuum scheduling. I think what we need to do is tightly couple the
rate at which we're willing to do vacuuming to the rate at which we're
incurring
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
A quick hack (attached) making BufferDescriptor 64byte aligned indeed
restored performance across all max_connections settings. It's not
surprising that a misaligned buffer descriptor causes problems -
there'll be
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Jeremy Harris j...@wizmail.org wrote:
The attached patch replaces the existing siftup method for heapify with
a siftdown method. Tested with random integers it does 18% fewer
compares and takes 10% less time for the heapify, over the work_mem
range 1024 to
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll update the patches according to that.
Here are the updated patches with the following changes (according to
previous
What - if anything - do I need to do to get this on the commitfest
list for the next commitfest?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
(2014/02/04 20:56), Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Allowing ALTER COLUMN SET STORAGE on foreign tables would make sense if for
example, SELECT * INTO local_table FROM foreign_table did create a new
local table of columns
Hello,
At Tue, 04 Feb 2014 02:07:08 -0500, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote in
3176.1391497...@sss.pgh.pa.us
One good reason not to trust this too much is that getaddrinfo() is
fundamentally a userspace DNS access function, and as such it has
no very good way to know if there's currently an
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp writes:
getaddrinfo returned two same entries having the same address
AF_INET 127.0.0.1:14357. One of them is for ::1 in
hosts. This is worse than current behavior X-(
Yeah, the fundamental issue is that getaddrinfo tends to return bogus
info.
On 02/05/2014 04:08 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
So doing a git bisect is just painful. Is the MSVC
build faster?
Yes, but not on EC2.
I've found Windows EC2 instances so impossibly slow I just gave up
working with it. It took 1.5 hours to do a build and regression check
with msvc on a Medium EC2
On 02/05/2014 02:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com writes:
On 02/04/2014 09:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
My own opinion is that I've already wasted untold man-hours thanks to
the random porting problems induced by Windows, a platform that I never
have and never will care
On 02/04/2014 10:48 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 02/05/2014 04:08 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
So doing a git bisect is just painful. Is the MSVC
build faster?
Yes, but not on EC2.
I've found Windows EC2 instances so impossibly slow I just gave up
working with it. It took 1.5 hours to do a build
On 02/05/2014 06:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
I had been okay with the manual PGDLLIMPORT-sprinkling approach
(not happy with it, of course, but prepared to tolerate it) as long
as I believed the buildfarm would reliably tell us of the need for
it. That assumption has now been conclusively
On 02/05/2014 12:06 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 02/04/2014 10:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-02-04 02:10:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Meh. It might be that the DateStyle usage in postgres_fdw would
accidentally fail to malfunction if it saw a
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Jon Nelson jnelson+pg...@jamponi.net wrote:
What - if anything - do I need to do to get this on the commitfest
list for the next commitfest?
The list of instructions is here:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch#Patch_submission
Then the next commit
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 03:28:45PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
I wonder if these standalone things are really worthwhile.
I wonder how
Hello All,
I have been reading through some of the recent discussions about failback
when in a streaming replication setup. I define failback as:
1. Node A is master, Node B is slave
2. Node A crashes || Node A is stopped || nothing happens
3. Promote Node B to Master
4. Attach Node
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 02/05/2014 06:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
I had been okay with the manual PGDLLIMPORT-sprinkling approach
(not happy with it, of course, but prepared to tolerate it) as long
as I believed the buildfarm would reliably tell us of the need for
it. That
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
Now there is approximately 1.4~5% CPU gain for
hundred tiny fields, half nulled case
Assuming that the logic isn't buggy, a point in need of
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:30 AM, James Sewell james.sew...@lisasoft.com
wrote:
Hello All,
I have been reading through some of the recent discussions about failback
when in a streaming replication setup. I define failback as:
Node A is master, Node B is slave
Node A crashes || Node A is
On 02/03/2014 05:22 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
I lost my stomach (or maybe it was the glass of red) somewhere in the
middle, but I think this needs a lot of work. Especially the io code
doesn't seem ready to me. I'd consider ripping out the send/recv code
for 9.4, that seems the biggest can of
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:30 AM, James Sewell james.sew...@lisasoft.com
I've seen some proposals and a tool (pg_rewind), but all seem to have draw
backs.
As far as I remember, one of the main drawbacks for pg_rewind
Andrew provided us more information and we'll work on recv. What
people think about testing this stuff ? btw, we don't have any
regression test on this.
Oleg
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 02/03/2014 07:27 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-02-03
On 02/04/2014 02:40 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
I refactored the loop in _bt_moveright to, well, not have that bug anymore.
The 'page' and 'opaque' pointers are now fetched at the beginning of the
loop. Did I miss
96 matches
Mail list logo
