Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, here's a question. Given the recent discussion re full
disjunction, I'd like to know what sort of commitment we are going to
give people who work on proposed projects.
Um, if you mean are we going to promise to accept a patch
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:21:42AM +, Dave Page wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, here's a question. Given the recent discussion re full
disjunction, I'd like to know what sort of commitment we are going to
give people who work on proposed
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:21:42AM +, Dave Page wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, here's a question. Given the recent discussion re full
disjunction, I'd like to know what sort of commitment we are going to
give people who work
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:53:41AM +, Dave Page wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:21:42AM +, Dave Page wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, here's a question. Given the recent discussion re full
disjunction, I'd like to
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Right. We'll just have to live by Googles rule for that part, I'm
talking about the discussions later. Once things are approved, they
should all be handled on the standard mailinglists, IMHO.
Oh, 100% agreed.
Being able to make possibly controversial suggestiosn public
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:47:14AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, but the list being discussed is SoC projects that the community
would like to see done, which means most people would assume that #1
isn't an issue.
We need to make sure that every
Well, the HOT discussion hasn't yet led to an accepted patch ... and I'd
say its authors still did way too much work before getting the community
involved. But certainly it's a better model to look at than what the
FD author did.
That's pretty much the mentor's job. I don't remember who
On Monday 26 February 2007 18:46, Josh Berkus wrote:
Demian,
Could you also please share your thoughts on what would be a good
student profile- for instance, how much theoretical background and
practical experience, for working on a SoC project?
Well, it shouldn't be the student's first
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
I agree we certainly don't want to go designing these projects in
advance, but I think we could at least ensure that the community buys
into the concept of each project.
Yes, at least for those that go on a suggestion list. And that was my
worry about Warren's suggestion
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:49:18AM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
I agree we certainly don't want to go designing these projects in
advance, but I think we could at least ensure that the community buys
into the concept of each project. ISTM one of the big issues with FD is
that most people didn't
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
I think it might be useful to at least encourage people wanting to an
SoC project to create page on the developer wiki selling their idea.
You know, questions like: why do we want it? Where do you expect it
to be included? etc.
They are expected to do as much
Josh Berkus wrote:
The next Summer of Code is just around the corner.
Last year, we had 46 submissions and seven we accepted. Out of the SoC we got
two ongoing contributors, several good patches, two code refactors and even
an employee for a PostgreSQL company. I'd like to see us do the
Andrew,
Is there a list of projects? Or can we suggest some?
Suggest away, please!
I'm going to update the website soon, would appreciate new content.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't
On 2/26/07, Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
The next Summer of Code is just around the corner.
Last year, we had 46 submissions and seven we accepted. Out of the SoC we got
two ongoing contributors, several good patches, two code refactors and even
an employee
Josh Berkus wrote:
Andrew,
Is there a list of projects? Or can we suggest some?
Suggest away, please!
I'm going to update the website soon, would appreciate new content.
here are a few ideas to be going on with (none of these are new):
buildfarm:
1. Buildfarm web app: is in
On 2/26/07, Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com wrote:
Andrew,
Is there a list of projects? Or can we suggest some?
Suggest away, please!
I'm going to update the website soon, would appreciate new content.
I can also volunteer to mentor continuing work on a TPC-E kit, for C
stored procedures and
On Monday 26 February 2007 14:22, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Is there a list of projects? Or can we suggest some?
Temporal database support
* base data types
- verify current for ISO compliance (timestamp, interval)
- implement period datatype
* operators for those datatypes
* add support for
Warren Turkal wrote:
On Monday 26 February 2007 14:22, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Is there a list of projects? Or can we suggest some?
Temporal database support
* base data types
- verify current for ISO compliance (timestamp, interval)
- implement period datatype
* operators for those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Could you also please share your thoughts on what would be a good
student profile- for instance, how much theoretical background and
practical experience, for working on a SoC project?
Demian
The next Summer of Code is just around the corner.
Demian,
Could you also please share your thoughts on what would be a good
student profile- for instance, how much theoretical background and
practical experience, for working on a SoC project?
Well, it shouldn't be the student's first year writing code. Basically,
they're committing to
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, here's a question. Given the recent discussion re full
disjunction, I'd like to know what sort of commitment we are going to
give people who work on proposed projects.
Um, if you mean are we going to promise to accept a patch in advance of
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, here's a question. Given the recent discussion re full
disjunction, I'd like to know what sort of commitment we are going to
give people who work on proposed projects.
Um, if you mean are we going to promise to accept a patch
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Correct me if I am wrong, but would the way that HOT has been handled be
a good way for the SoC people to do things?
Well, the HOT discussion hasn't yet led to an accepted patch ... and I'd
say its authors still did way too much work before getting the
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:10:38PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, here's a question. Given the recent discussion re full
disjunction, I'd like to know what sort of commitment we are going to
give people who work on proposed projects.
Um, if you
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, but the list being discussed is SoC projects that the community
would like to see done, which means most people would assume that #1
isn't an issue.
We need to make sure that every project on the list of SoC ideas is
supported by the community.
25 matches
Mail list logo
