Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> I think it might be useful to at least encourage people wanting to an
> SoC project to create page on the developer wiki selling their idea.
> You know, questions like: why do we want it? Where do you expect it
> to be included? etc.
They are expected to do as much
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:49:18AM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> I agree we certainly don't want to go designing these projects in
> advance, but I think we could at least ensure that the community buys
> into the concept of each project. ISTM one of the big issues with FD is
> that most people didn
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
I agree we certainly don't want to go designing these projects in
advance, but I think we could at least ensure that the community buys
into the concept of each project.
Yes, at least for those that go on a suggestion list. And that was my
worry about Warren's suggestion
On Monday 26 February 2007 18:46, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Demian,
>
> > Could you also please share your thoughts on what would be a good
> > student profile- for instance, how much theoretical background and
> > practical experience, for working on a SoC project?
>
> Well, it shouldn't be the student
> Well, the HOT discussion hasn't yet led to an accepted patch ... and I'd
> say its authors still did way too much work before getting the community
> involved. But certainly it's a better model to look at than what the
> FD author did.
That's pretty much the mentor's job. I don't remember who
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:47:14AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes, but the list being discussed is SoC projects that the community
> > would like to see done, which means most people would assume that #1
> > isn't an issue.
>
> > We need to make sure th
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Right. We'll just have to live by Googles rule for that part, I'm
> talking about the discussions later. Once things are approved, they
> should all be handled on the standard mailinglists, IMHO.
Oh, 100% agreed.
> Being able to make "possibly controversial" suggestiosn p
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:53:41AM +, Dave Page wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:21:42AM +, Dave Page wrote:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, here's a question. Given the recent discussion re full
> disjun
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:21:42AM +, Dave Page wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Well, here's a question. Given the recent discussion re full
disjunction, I'd like to know what sort of commitment we are going to
g
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:21:42AM +, Dave Page wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Well, here's a question. Given the recent discussion re full
> >> disjunction, I'd like to know what sort of commitment we are going to
> >> give people who work on pro
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well, here's a question. Given the recent discussion re full
>> disjunction, I'd like to know what sort of commitment we are going to
>> give people who work on proposed projects.
>
> Um, if you mean are we going to promise to accep
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, but the list being discussed is SoC projects that the community
> would like to see done, which means most people would assume that #1
> isn't an issue.
> We need to make sure that every project on the list of SoC ideas is
> supported by the commun
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:10:38PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, here's a question. Given the recent discussion re full
> > disjunction, I'd like to know what sort of commitment we are going to
> > give people who work on proposed projects.
>
> Um,
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Correct me if I am wrong, but would the way that HOT has been handled be
> a good way for the SoC people to do things?
Well, the HOT discussion hasn't yet led to an accepted patch ... and I'd
say its authors still did way too much work before getting
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well, here's a question. Given the recent discussion re full
>> disjunction, I'd like to know what sort of commitment we are going to
>> give people who work on proposed projects.
>
> Um, if you mean are we going to promise to accep
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, here's a question. Given the recent discussion re full
> disjunction, I'd like to know what sort of commitment we are going to
> give people who work on proposed projects.
Um, if you mean are we going to promise to accept a patch in advance of
s
Demian,
> Could you also please share your thoughts on what would be a good
> student profile- for instance, how much theoretical background and
> practical experience, for working on a SoC project?
Well, it shouldn't be the student's first year writing code. Basically,
they're committing to de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Could you also please share your thoughts on what would be a good
student profile- for instance, how much theoretical background and
practical experience, for working on a SoC project?
Demian
> The next Summer of Code is just around the corner.
>
>
Warren Turkal wrote:
On Monday 26 February 2007 14:22, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Is there a list of projects? Or can we suggest some?
Temporal database support
* base data types
- verify current for ISO compliance (timestamp, interval)
- implement period datatype
* operators for those
On Monday 26 February 2007 14:22, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Is there a list of projects? Or can we suggest some?
Temporal database support
* base data types
- verify current for ISO compliance (timestamp, interval)
- implement period datatype
* operators for those datatypes
* add support for val
On 2/26/07, Josh Berkus wrote:
Andrew,
> Is there a list of projects? Or can we suggest some?
Suggest away, please!
I'm going to update the website soon, would appreciate new content.
I can also volunteer to mentor continuing work on a TPC-E kit, for C
stored procedures and improved results
Josh Berkus wrote:
Andrew,
Is there a list of projects? Or can we suggest some?
Suggest away, please!
I'm going to update the website soon, would appreciate new content.
here are a few ideas to be going on with (none of these are new):
buildfarm:
1. Buildfarm web app: is in u
On 2/26/07, Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
> The next Summer of Code is just around the corner.
>
> Last year, we had 46 submissions and seven we accepted. Out of the SoC we got
> two ongoing contributors, several good patches, two code refactors and even
> an emplo
Andrew,
> Is there a list of projects? Or can we suggest some?
Suggest away, please!
I'm going to update the website soon, would appreciate new content.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't
Josh Berkus wrote:
The next Summer of Code is just around the corner.
Last year, we had 46 submissions and seven we accepted. Out of the SoC we got
two ongoing contributors, several good patches, two code refactors and even
an employee for a PostgreSQL company. I'd like to see us do the same
The next Summer of Code is just around the corner.
Last year, we had 46 submissions and seven we accepted. Out of the SoC we got
two ongoing contributors, several good patches, two code refactors and even
an employee for a PostgreSQL company. I'd like to see us do the same this
year!
Therefo
26 matches
Mail list logo