Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo70 alpha] Store settings raise a DNU primFlush

Thanks guy. I was dead tired. Did not have the energy to look went to sleep. On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:44 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > >> On 13 Apr 2018, at 22:26, Alistair Grant wrote: >> >> Hi Stef & Sven, >> >> On 13 April 2018 at 20:38,

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [TechTalk] April 12: GIT with Iceberg

On 14 April 2018 at 01:55, Guillermo Polito wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:34 PM, Ben Coman wrote: > >> >> >> On 14 April 2018 at 01:10, Guillermo Polito >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:57

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo70 alpha] Store settings raise a DNU primFlush

> On 13 Apr 2018, at 22:26, Alistair Grant wrote: > > Hi Stef & Sven, > > On 13 April 2018 at 20:38, Stephane Ducasse wrote: >> Hi >> >> I do not know if this is related to the OldStreamCleaningEffort but >> when I press store settings in the

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo70 alpha] Store settings raise a DNU primFlush

Hi Stef & Sven, On 13 April 2018 at 20:38, Stephane Ducasse wrote: > Hi > > I do not know if this is related to the OldStreamCleaningEffort but > when I press store settings in the Settings browser I get a primitive > failed. > >

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg2.0 crash test passed :)

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > > On 13 Apr 2018, at 21:43, Serge Stinckwich > wrote: > > Yes I was able to commit also. > Very slick interface :-) > > > But now, every time I want to commit, my image crash and I

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg2.0 crash test passed :)

> On 13 Apr 2018, at 21:43, Serge Stinckwich wrote: > > Yes I was able to commit also. > Very slick interface :-) > > > But now, every time I want to commit, my image crash and I have: > > Assertion failed: (git_atomic_get(__n_inits) > 0), function >

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg2.0 crash test passed :)

Yes Pharo 7.0, latest VM 64 bits On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:46 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote: > Is that Pharo 7? > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:43 PM, Serge Stinckwich < > serge.stinckw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes I was able to commit also. >> Very slick interface :-)

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg2.0 crash test passed :)

Is that Pharo 7? On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:43 PM, Serge Stinckwich < serge.stinckw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes I was able to commit also. > Very slick interface :-) > > > But now, every time I want to commit, my image crash and I have: > > Assertion failed: (git_atomic_get(__n_inits) > 0),

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg2.0 crash test passed :)

Yes I was able to commit also. Very slick interface :-) But now, every time I want to commit, my image crash and I have: Assertion failed: (git_atomic_get(__n_inits) > 0), function git__global_state, file

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg2.0 crash test passed :)

I want your bug reports! Le ven. 13 avr. 2018 à 21:09, Stephane Ducasse a écrit : > I could commit my first commit with iceberg 2.0 > Well done > > It feels nicer :). > > Stef > > -- Guille Polito Research Engineer Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et

[Pharo-dev] Iceberg2.0 crash test passed :)

I could commit my first commit with iceberg 2.0 Well done It feels nicer :). Stef

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo70 alpha] Store settings raise a DNU primFlush

Hi I do not know if this is related to the OldStreamCleaningEffort but when I press store settings in the Settings browser I get a primitive failed. https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21699/Store-settings-raise-a-DNU-primFlush Stef

Re: [Pharo-dev] updating preference to iceberg2 help needed :)

On ven. 13 avr. 2018 at 20:32, Stephane Ducasse wrote: > Any idea for this one? > > IceRepository > shareRepositoriesBetweenImages: true; > sharedRepositoriesLocationString: > '/Users/ducasse/Workspace/FirstCircle/ActiveResearch/Pharo/PharoCodeBase/'. > > Hi!

[Pharo-dev] updating preference to iceberg2 help needed :)

Any idea for this one? IceRepository shareRepositoriesBetweenImages: true; sharedRepositoriesLocationString: '/Users/ducasse/Workspace/FirstCircle/ActiveResearch/Pharo/PharoCodeBase/'.

[Pharo-dev] [OT] Reminder about quoting/top-posting

Hi, Please apologize the digression, but these days there were a lot of interesting threads with LOTS of replies from different members. Can I ask for more trimming of the quoted text and/or emails replied to? The follow up of some replies was hard because they were nested deep into a chain of

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #765: 21692-StdioStream-incorrectly-delegates-atEnd-and-position-to-file

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #765 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1193 was integrated: "21692-StdioStream-incorrectly-delegates-atEnd-and-position-to-file" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1193 Issue Url:

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [TechTalk] April 12: GIT with Iceberg

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:34 PM, Ben Coman wrote: > > > On 14 April 2018 at 01:10, Guillermo Polito > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Ben Coman wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 13 April 2018 at 23:15, Alistair

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [TechTalk] April 12: GIT with Iceberg

On 14 April 2018 at 01:10, Guillermo Polito wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Ben Coman wrote: > >> >> >> On 13 April 2018 at 23:15, Alistair Grant wrote: >> >>> On 13 April 2018 at 17:07, Cyril Ferlicot

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #764: Fix Case 21686 Setting background images doesn't work on Pharo 7.0

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #764 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1197 was integrated: "Fix Case 21686 Setting background images doesn't work on Pharo 7.0" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1197 Issue Url:

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [TechTalk] April 12: GIT with Iceberg

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Ben Coman wrote: > > > On 13 April 2018 at 23:15, Alistair Grant wrote: > >> On 13 April 2018 at 17:07, Cyril Ferlicot >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On ven. 13 avr. 2018 at 17:03, Guillermo

Re: [Pharo-dev] request Calypso added as a "project" in Fogbugz

On 13 April 2018 at 21:24, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Ben Coman wrote > > However I have some concerns about scattering Issues away from Fogbugz > > since this makes it harder to get an overview of outstanding issues > > Point taken, but: > - IIUC we will be soon moving to

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [TechTalk] April 12: GIT with Iceberg

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:38 PM, Alistair Grant wrote: > Hi Guille, > > On 13 April 2018 at 17:29, Guillermo Polito > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:15 PM, Alistair Grant > > wrote: > >> > >> On 13 April

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [TechTalk] April 12: GIT with Iceberg

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:15 PM, Alistair Grant wrote: > On 13 April 2018 at 17:07, Cyril Ferlicot > wrote: > > > > > > On ven. 13 avr. 2018 at 17:03, Guillermo Polito < > guillermopol...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> The thing is that the

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [TechTalk] April 12: GIT with Iceberg

On 13 April 2018 at 17:07, Cyril Ferlicot wrote: > > > On ven. 13 avr. 2018 at 17:03, Guillermo Polito > wrote: >> >> >> The thing is that the best way to do it is to clone your own fork... And >> each one has her/his one. >> > > > What your

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [TechTalk] April 12: GIT with Iceberg

On ven. 13 avr. 2018 at 17:03, Guillermo Polito wrote: > > The thing is that the best way to do it is to clone your own fork... And > each one has her/his one. > > What your can do is display the list of forks and ask to select the right one. Then it will create the

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [TechTalk] April 12: GIT with Iceberg

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Ben Coman wrote: > > > On 13 April 2018 at 21:14, Marcus Denker wrote: > >> >> >> On 13 Apr 2018, at 15:04, Andrei Stebakov wrote: >> >> Can you make the video available online? >> >> >>

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [TechTalk] April 12: GIT with Iceberg

On 13 April 2018 at 21:14, Marcus Denker wrote: > > > On 13 Apr 2018, at 15:04, Andrei Stebakov wrote: > > Can you make the video available online? > > > https://youtu.be/A9H8jsSnBKM > I like the new "New Repo", particularly additional of GitHub

Re: [Pharo-dev] request Calypso added as a "project" in Fogbugz

Ben Coman wrote > However I have some concerns about scattering Issues away from Fogbugz > since this makes it harder to get an overview of outstanding issues Point taken, but: - IIUC we will be soon moving to *all* github issues anyway - duplication has it's own negative consequences - There are

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [TechTalk] April 12: GIT with Iceberg

> On 13 Apr 2018, at 15:04, Andrei Stebakov wrote: > > Can you make the video available online? https://youtu.be/A9H8jsSnBKM > Another question, is there a tutorial on Iceberg? For the updated UI not yet. From the “how do I commit a PR to Pharo” perspective, I

[Pharo-dev] [ANN] Pharo Sprint Apr 20

Pharo Sprint Apr 20 https://association.pharo.org/event-2789579 We will organize a Pharo sprint / Moose dojo Apr 20 , starting at 10:00am. (Local Time Paris). Goals of this sprint: • Pharo 7 issues Remote Sprint Remotely, you can join us on Discord. During the

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #763: 21691-update-iceberg-to-072

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #763 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1192 was integrated: "21691-update-iceberg-to-072" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1192 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21691 Build Url:

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] New VM stables promoted

Sounds good. Thanks for the explanation and for all the effort! Doru > On Apr 13, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > > >> On 13 Apr 2018, at 12:35, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> A question: do we need to revert all VMs if only

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] New VM stables promoted

> On 13 Apr 2018, at 12:35, Tudor Girba wrote: > > Hi, > > A question: do we need to revert all VMs if only the Linux 32 is not working? > Do we prefer to release all together because it is easier to manage? yes, is because otherwise is a mess to manage. but you can

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] New VM stables promoted

> On 13 Apr 2018, at 11:57, Alistair Grant wrote: > > Hi Esteban, > > I don't know whether you also updated the 6.1 VMs, but for the Pharo 7 > VMs could you consider only reverting the linux 32 bit VM? I reverted all. And I started to check the linux problem. cheers!

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] New VM stables promoted

Hi Esteban, I don't know whether you also updated the 6.1 VMs, but for the Pharo 7 VMs could you consider only reverting the linux 32 bit VM? Pharo 7 is alpha, so anyone (well, most people :-)) using it are prepared for a few hiccups, and it will provide better confidence when you do the next

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] New VM stables promoted

> On 13 Apr 2018, at 11:50, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > meh… and I will be to revert again. I will *need* to revert, I meant. Esteban > > linux 32 VM libgit2 is not working, it seems. > > I will revert. > And I will do an stop the world to fix the VM dependency

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] New VM stables promoted

meh… and I will be to revert again. linux 32 VM libgit2 is not working, it seems. I will revert. And I will do an stop the world to fix the VM dependency problems because this is too much. Next week, updates of iceberg will come from Guille’s hand, I will be working on VM-side. cheers,

Re: [Pharo-dev] request Calypso added as a "project" in Fogbugz

> On 13 Apr 2018, at 11:28, Ben Coman wrote: > > Can Calypso be added as a "project" in Fogbugz? > I went to create an issue but could not find an appropriate place to file it > under. > I added it. > As a backup I add an issue to the github tracker... >

[Pharo-dev] request Calypso added as a "project" in Fogbugz

Can Calypso be added as a "project" in Fogbugz? I went to create an issue but could not find an appropriate place to file it under. As a backup I add an issue to the github tracker... https://github.com/dionisiydk/Calypso/issues/235 However I have some concerns about scattering Issues away from

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] New VM stables promoted

> On 13 Apr 2018, at 10:31, Serge Stinckwich wrote: > > Thank you Esteban. Including 7.0 64 bits ? All VMs. (Still not 64bit windows, sorry) Esteban > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Esteban Lorenzano >

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] New VM stables promoted

Thank you Esteban. Including 7.0 64 bits ? On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Hi, > > I just promoted new VMs as stable. > > This are the builds corresponding to: > > 20180416 (07c6dc3) > > this passed the build tests so *it should* be ok. > >

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] New VM stables promoted

Yuuppeee! I will test the 64bit right away. Thanks, Doru > On Apr 13, 2018, at 9:55 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > Hi, > > I just promoted new VMs as stable. > > This are the builds corresponding to: > > 20180416 (07c6dc3) > > this passed the build tests so

[Pharo-dev] [ANN] New VM stables promoted

Hi, I just promoted new VMs as stable. This are the builds corresponding to: 20180416 (07c6dc3) this passed the build tests so *it should* be ok. can you people test? thanks! Esteban