Re: [PHP-DEV] Language Auto Detection / www.php.net

2003-03-12 Thread James Cox
Gabor Hojtsy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is there any chance that we can revert this annoying feature? The translated documentation is always behind and partly lacks important information from the english version. I want to read the documentation in english (and I am not the only one). This

[PHP-DEV] upcoming plans for servers

2003-02-26 Thread James Cox
not be noticed. If anyone has any further questions, please feel free to email me, [EMAIL PROTECTED] or simply reply to this email. Thanks, James -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://imajes.info/ Was I helpful? http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/wishlist/23IVGHQ61RJGO/ -- PHP Development

RE: [PHP-DEV] can't get wincvs to ask for login

2003-02-03 Thread James Cox
Hi, I'm trying to commit some changes, and can't get wincvs to log me in or even to request a password with pserver. I've changed the username from cvsread to cellog. Anyone with wincvs experience know how to make the stupid thing work? Your best bet is to use the CVS win32 port,

RE: [PHP-DEV] roadmap of PHP - where? PHP 5 - when?

2003-01-23 Thread James Cox
-Original Message- From: Dan Kalowsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I've heard the arguments for the list, and I can only say they are valid reasons. But you're now making PHP a political project rather than a software project. Thanks. This is the sort of thing I don't want to have

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PEAR-DEV] 'php4' CVS module for PHP 5?

2003-01-14 Thread James Cox
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, James Cox wrote: it's called compatibility Nicos. having libphp4.so, libphp5.so, libphp6.so... and so on means that they can work together. Once libphp5.so gets building properly and we have moved onto that track completely, i intend to build a latest stable

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP4 + PHP5

2003-01-14 Thread James Cox
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, James Cox wrote: On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:46:45 -0500 Mike Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm wondering if it will be possible to build and use both PHP4 and PHP5 as apache modules on the same webserver, similar to the way we could use both PHP3

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PEAR-DEV] 'php4' CVS module for PHP 5?

2003-01-13 Thread James Cox
Hello, What do you think about the idea of Martin that would use libphp.so and not libphp5.so ? it's called compatibility Nicos. having libphp4.so, libphp5.so, libphp6.so... and so on means that they can work together. Once libphp5.so gets building properly and we have moved onto

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP4 + PHP5

2003-01-13 Thread James Cox
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:46:45 -0500 Mike Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hiya, I'm wondering if it will be possible to build and use both PHP4 and PHP5 as apache modules on the same webserver, similar to the way we could use both PHP3 and PHP4. I hope so. libphp5 will be the

[PHP-DEV] RE: cvs checkout skip dir

2003-01-12 Thread James Cox
I am actually pondering about removing distrobutions from phpweb, and moving it to it's own cvs module, with slightly more heavier control over it. This is to be a bit more secure over releases, and also it is usually not needed during a checkout of phpweb. (if you're going to checkout phpweb,

[PHP-DEV] RE: cvs checkout skip dir

2003-01-12 Thread James Cox
To: James Cox; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Php-Dev Subject: Re: cvs checkout skip dir I am actually pondering about removing distrobutions from phpweb, and moving it to it's own cvs module, with slightly more heavier control over it. This is to be a bit more secure over

[PHP-DEV] RE: cvs checkout skip dir

2003-01-12 Thread James Cox
be trivial, i think. -- james -Original Message- From: Gabor Hojtsy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 5:16 PM To: James Cox; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Php-Dev Subject: Re: cvs checkout skip dir hmm. that is an interesting idea... hacking

Re: [PHP-DEV] CVS mangled (netware/apachecore.imp,netware/bisonflexzend.bat)

2003-01-01 Thread James Cox
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 08:17, Wez Furlong wrote: % cvs -q up cvs server: nothing known about netware/apachecore.imp cvs server: nothing known about netware/bisonflexzend.bat I can't find any trace of these files in my checkout (or in the CVS files), so I presume that something has been

Re: [PHP-DEV] ChangeLog

2003-01-01 Thread James Cox
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 08:21, Wez Furlong wrote: Is there some magic that needs to be done to rotate the ChangeLog? By this I mean: gzip ChangeLog mv ChangeLog.gz ChangeLog2002.gz touch ChangeLog cvs add -kb ChangeLog2002.gz cvs ci -m rotate changelog ChangeLog ChangeLog2002.gz It seems

RE: [PHP-DEV] Problem with commit

2002-12-05 Thread James Cox
um.. ok.. i'm looking into a few issues with cvs right now... could you send me the full content of any header etc you might have received, anything that suggests what triggered that error... -- james -Original Message- From: Marcus Borger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,

[PHP-DEV] test, please disregard.

2002-12-05 Thread James Cox
-- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://james.blogs.at/ Was I helpful? http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/wishlist/23IVGHQ61RJGO/ -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] LXR on pear/PECL

2002-12-01 Thread James Cox
Sure, once LXR moves to a new machine i'll make that work. Thanks, James -Original Message- From: Joao Prado Maia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 11:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PHP-DEV] LXR on pear/PECL Hi, I'm not sure who is in

RE: [PHP-DEV] ZE2 question

2002-11-28 Thread James Cox
it means double colon in hebrew... i think Zeev and Andi must not have known what to call it in english when they put it in... but hey, it was the first i18n'ized error message :) -- jamess -Original Message- From: Marcus Borger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 28,

RE: [PHP-DEV] New vpopmail extension for PHP

2002-11-28 Thread James Cox
it's not orphaned, i'm nursing it back to life :) -- james -Original Message- From: Markus Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 8:53 PM To: Rui Barreiros Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] New vpopmail extension for PHP vpopmail

RE: [PHP-DEV] GIF support

2002-11-21 Thread James Cox
guys, how about we just like leave this for a couple of months till 2003 when the patent runs out? -- james -Original Message- From: Marcus Borger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:23 AM To: Stefan Esser Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV]

RE: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Redirect on Error

2002-11-21 Thread James Cox
did you forget to return http 500 in the sapis? -- james -Original Message- From: John Coggeshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:56 AM To: 'PHP Developers Mailing List' Subject: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Redirect on Error Okay... Well, even though

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

2002-11-21 Thread James Cox
systems -- eg, for 404. -- james -Original Message- From: Maxim Maletsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:15 PM To: James Cox Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'PHP Developers Mailing List' Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] error handling Writing for newbies, I often

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

2002-11-21 Thread James Cox
In Real Life [Patent Pending], if you cripple your production site in the middle of the night then go to bed, you won't have to worry about any of this because you'd be unemployed in the morning. +1... don't commit code without QA! I agree with Derick's assessment. I always have the

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

2002-11-21 Thread James Cox
Also, from a management point of view (I manage programmers), what you are describing there can work in some cases but what if a programmer forgets/is-too-lazy to to that? I don't want to wait for the next morning to know about it. if a programmer is too lazy to test, fire them.

RE: [PHP-DEV] Fwd: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/bcmath bcmath.c /ext/bcmath/libbcmath/src bcmath.h init.c output.c raise.c raisemod.c recmul.c sqrt.c str2num.c zero.c

2002-11-20 Thread James Cox
well. the cvs log for these files show Zeev deleted them 3 years ago (after removing the content). They were GPL'ed, so clearly deleting them was the only option... number.c 1.7 zeev3 yearsWe'll have to live without these files somehow. number.h 1.5 zeev3 years

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

2002-11-20 Thread James Cox
it can; 500 means server error -- perl, cgi, mod_include, etc all do it, so why shouldn't php? -- james -Original Message- From: John Coggeshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:06 PM To: 'James Cox' Cc: 'PHP Developers Mailing List' Subject: RE

RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling

2002-11-20 Thread James Cox
: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:17 PM To: James Cox Cc: 'PHP Developers Mailing List' Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] error handling The problem with this is that the 500 error does not provide any information about the error. Which for me is a bad thing. Now that I think about it i am seeing some light

[PHP-DEV] PHP Rsync

2002-11-17 Thread James Cox
All, After a lot of tweaking, rsync is now back up and ready to rock. there are still going to be some teething errors, due to phpdoc errors, but i will be working with the phpdoc team to iron these out. Thanks, James -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://james.blogs.at/ Was I helpful

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Support for Birdstep RDM Server database engine

2002-11-17 Thread James Cox
fwiw, i have also meddled with birdstep slightly, by making the namechange from velocis to birdstep. I agree with Dan -- i think it should be pecl'ed, and perhaps not so reliant on the odbc stuff -- that whole extension is just confusing. That said, Dan is the best person to work on with this.

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP Snaps

2002-11-14 Thread James Cox
At 16:49 12.11.2002, Jon Parise wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Marcus Brger wrote: Yes when i introduce a problem with win32 build i have to wait up to 4 hours until i can see the problem and try to fix it. Then i have to wait 4 more hours to see whther i did it

[PHP-DEV] manual notes

2002-11-13 Thread James Cox
The manual notes should be live again. i dry rsynced phpweb on www so it contains all the latest updates. we are just now finalizing the manual builds so the whole thing can get switched on properly. - - james -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://james.blogs.at/ Was I helpful? http

RE: [PHP-DEV] Changelog broken?

2002-11-11 Thread James Cox
Changelog does seem to be broken, and it's on our list of things to do. Thanks, James -Original Message- From: Steve Alberty [mailto:staybyte;php.net] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PHP-DEV] Changelog broken? Hi, the Changelog

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP Snaps

2002-11-11 Thread James Cox
I can certainly set this up. any preference for timeformat? (bearing in mind we use unix date) -- james Is it possible to increase build time from 4 hours to 2 hours and use a time format that displays the timezone? marcus At 00:34 11.11.2002, James Cox wrote: Snaps are back

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP Snaps

2002-11-11 Thread James Cox
of course, all this can be achieved with some simple apache magic... -- james On Monday 11 November 2002 23:20, Ilia A. wrote: Nice format but it doesn't sort well in directory listings :) True, but we only have about a dosen files and with a human readable format directory file

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP Snaps

2002-11-11 Thread James Cox
Ilia, be my guest... -- james -Original Message- From: Ilia A. [mailto:ilia;prohost.org] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 10:30 PM To: Edin Kadribasic; James Cox; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Php-Dev Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP Snaps Well there are a number of issues. First of all

[PHP-DEV] PHP Snaps

2002-11-10 Thread James Cox
Snaps are back! The snapserver is back up and alive, with both unix and win32 snaps... -- james -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://james.blogs.at/ Was I helpful? http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/wishlist/23IVGHQ61RJGO/ -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring and 4.3.0

2002-11-08 Thread James Cox
Historically, I have been against mbstring being enabled by default. My feelings towards anything being enabled by default, unless it is considered core functionality, is pretty negative though. The reasoning to consider a extension as a part of core, is prone to be obscure. It's

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring and 4.3.0

2002-11-07 Thread James Cox
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Marcus Boerger wrote: To make php be easier usable in non US-ASCII (127chars) environments especially those requiring UCS-2, UTF-8 or other any character mapping other than iso-8859-1 or -15 we should more likly try to integrate mbstring fully in php. As long as

[PHP-DEV] Rsync and Snaps

2002-11-02 Thread James Cox
rsync) you may wish to comment them out to reduce server noise. Thanks, James -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://james.blogs.at/ Was I helpful? http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/wishlist/23IVGHQ61RJGO/ -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http

RE: [PHP-DEV] apache_hooks

2002-11-02 Thread James Cox
I think we could produce a snap of this by checking out normally, and then checking out apache_hooks into it, so the files it affects would go to the right tag... (etc etc). I'd be happy to do this when i set up snaps again. -- james What do you think would be the best way to make the

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Unsigned Problems Revisited

2002-10-30 Thread James Cox
We're going to walk into a confusion where people will expect to work too, and get bitten. We have to be really careful that we explain it properly. -- james I think you guys have convinced me that having only isn't too bad (Jason will kill me now). Does anyone here on php-dev have any

RE: [PHP-DEV] hebrew patch for jewish calendar

2002-10-30 Thread James Cox
Derick, everyone else seemed to get this patch as an attachment... -- james -Original Message- From: moshe doron [mailto:mosdoron;netvision.net.il] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] hebrew patch for jewish calendar i already

RE: [PHP-DEV] The reason the way it is: About flushing... Please read and comment.

2002-10-23 Thread James Cox
i think it's really quite simple.. be able to allow the developer the freedom to make their own mind up. As Harmut pointed out, some cli stuff needs implicit flushing. Other stuff doesn't -- i have many php scriptlets which do tasks for me that sh can't quite handle (or i don't know how to do it

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [4.3] Current critical bugs

2002-10-18 Thread James Cox
What actual patch did you add to ap2filter? -- james -Original Message- From: Ryo Takagi [mailto:rt;takagi-ryo.ac] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 10:41 AM To: Yasuo Ohgaki Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Andrei Zmievski Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [4.3] Current critical

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Apache 2 incorrect 304 response to If-Modified-Since

2002-10-14 Thread James Cox
I don't particularly like the look of this patch... we should fix 304's properly... --- sapi/apache2filter/sapi_apache2.c~ Fri Aug 16 07:27:03 2002 +++ sapi/apache2filter/sapi_apache2.c Mon Oct 14 23:27:26 2002 -558,14 +558,24 return OK; } +static int

RE: [PHP-DEV] Funny guys...

2002-10-13 Thread James Cox
were there any problems with the cvs server yesterday? In my commit from yesterday morning i added the line pp++, this was commited as p++. In my file on the harddisk there is clearly a pp++ and NOT a p++. (Which makes no sense anyway) commit message states... - if

RE: [PHP-DEV] Scratching the 4.3 branch

2002-10-06 Thread James Cox
Btw, it will be very usefull if someone can add $id and a little TODO inside the gd source :-))) I am very tempted to clean up the GD source. I hate the way it is formatted. Nothing has happened since March 2001 from the Boutell folks despite numerous bug patches sent their way.

RE: [PHP-DEV] sticky perms in CVS?

2002-09-23 Thread James Cox
The perms are fine in cvs: -r--r--r-- 1 cvs cvs 24388 Sep 23 14:18 user_streams.c,v -- james My umask is 022 (and I've never changed it, not since my early uni days on those old SGI Indigos when I was paranoid). I'm wondering if somehow the file was originally created read-only (I

RE: [PHP-DEV] sticky perms in CVS?

2002-09-23 Thread James Cox
nope. But aren't all the other files -rw-r--r-- ? On 09/23/02, James Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The perms are fine in cvs: -r--r--r-- 1 cvs cvs 24388 Sep 23 14:18 user_streams.c,v -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http

RE: [PHP-DEV] Thread Reading

2002-09-19 Thread James Cox
At 20:10 19/09/2002, Adam Voigt wrote: Newbie's or people seeking help with bad security standards, could give away the password to there SQL server, etc. Maybe the phps parser or whatever it's called should automatically *** out the password fields of all the db, ftp, etc. calls. I don't

RE: [PHP-DEV] Thread Reading

2002-09-18 Thread James Cox
I agree. Lets jsut get this in the tree.. -- james On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 02:28:35AM +0100, Dan Hardiker wrote : This doesnt demonstrate the use of the show_source (or other aliased) function, but I assure you - it works similarly with an optional parameter, defaulting to current

RE: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request:

2002-09-10 Thread James Cox
the 'flood' of cvs requests aren't an attack of sorts, they are simply all coming at once because the smtp server on www.php.net was turned off for a while. do not be alarmed! :) -- james -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] ADT CVS Commits

2002-09-09 Thread James Cox
I'm trying to get [EMAIL PROTECTED] created to automate this process, if the new mailing lists aren't created by tonight I'll go ahead and manually make the changes :) Done. -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: sockets extension

2002-09-09 Thread James Cox
For the benefit of other users i did a status check on the general situation with extensions: Total extensions bundled with PHP4.2.3 = 94 # of them that are Expermintal = 24 Therefore more than 25% are expermental. Among the experimental. Experimental for 19 months

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Problems with PHP.net MX

2002-09-08 Thread James Cox
we're fine. I believe the mx is happy again. Nice news. We are 1 day later, still no mail. I would like to repeat again that If you need a hoster, I'm available. -- Nicos - CHAILLAN Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.WorldAKT.com - Hébergement de sites Internet Jim Winstead [EMAIL

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: #19286 [NEW]: header() Control Char Injection

2002-09-07 Thread James Cox
Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: This obvious security risk is mentioned in bugtraq today. IMHO, this is users' fault. They must check values before using it. In this specfic case, user should use simple regex before feeding str to header(). Any opinion to meke this to won't fix? One thing

RE: [PHP-DEV] [BUG] bugs.php.net bugs

2002-09-06 Thread James Cox
agreed, although I can't do much to it, i have had a look. -- james In our case, nobody would check the logs. Easier to let users read them for us and let us know. Sounds like something is fishy with the new MySQL 4 setup we are using on the new server. -Rasmus On Fri, 6 Sep 2002,

RE: [PHP-DEV] [BUG] bugs.php.net bugs

2002-09-06 Thread James Cox
4:25 PM To: James Cox Cc: Rasmus Lerdorf; Markus Fischer; Dan Kalowsky; Devon O'Dell; php-dev Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [BUG] bugs.php.net bugs Just a thought: Why not make mail list for the websites and send a mail for those to that mailing list instead of letting the users report them

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: mbstring

2002-09-03 Thread James Cox
No, this option is 'disabled' by default, and can be enabled by a ini variable. mbstring.encoding_translation = Off; is default. If mbstring.encoding_translation = On is set in php.ini, the transparent conversion will be enabled. ok, but before, you had to --enable it before it'd work?

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: mbstring

2002-09-03 Thread James Cox
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 7:51 AM To: James Cox Cc: Rui Hirokawa; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: mbstring On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, James Cox wrote: No, this option is 'disabled

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
Derick pretty much said it for me... but more explicitly, mbstring isn't stable enough to be default. -- james -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 6:41 AM To: Masaki Fujimoto Cc: James Cox; Wez Furlong; Php-Dev

RE: [PHP-DEV] Problem with http://php.net

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
some of the httpd processes went defunct (also, because rotatelogs did) . http://www.php.net/server-status -- works now. :) -- james -Original Message- From: Andrey Hristov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 9:39 AM To: Andrey Hristov; [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [PHP-DEV] Problem with http://php.net

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
-Original Message- From: James Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 9:53 AM To: Andrey Hristov; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Problem with http://php.net some of the httpd processes went defunct (also, because rotatelogs did) . http://www.php.net

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
Wez, lets loose the crap here. I am happy to see mbstring in PHP! I have used it too, when I needed multibyte support. But you see, it's not really all that solid. It needs more work (hence this apparent development outside of php.net). All I am saying is that we should disable it by default

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
At 13:19 02/09/2002, James Cox wrote: As I see it, PHP was designed with speed and simplicity in mind. It was indeed.. Having the burden of a large number of extra modules compiled in by default doesn't help, and deviates from this path. Not really. Speed-wise, adding modules has

[PHP-DEV] RE:

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
-Original Message- From: Sent: None Subject: Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 06:42:15 -0500 (EST) From: Sterling Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Cc:

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
As I see it, PHP was designed with speed and simplicity in mind. Having the burden of a large number of extra modules compiled in by default doesn't help, and deviates from this path. No, you can always disable those extensions. The default extensions were *voted* in for a reason.

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, James Cox wrote: JC Still, I think it makes more sense to enable, not disable. What extensions are enabled by default anyhow? I am not aware of a list. Perhaps that's why i get odd errors when working with php, because there are extensions i didn't expect built

RE: [PHP-DEV] Problem with http://php.net

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
This goes to everyone who has root or sudo on the boxes.. for example i'll get paged if something gets broken. This should guarentee a faster response time (although, php-dev works too :)) Wow. I guess your pager does not stand still a second then... :) Well, it works as a good

RE: [PHP-DEV] Problem with http://php.net

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
Back to the topic... When will the MX be up again? The box actually hasn't died yet. SSH and SMTP are open, and seem to be listening -- it is possible to make a connection to them. For some reason however... ssh doesn't auth, and then times out... so there are probably a bunch of defunct

RE: [PHP-DEV] Problem with http://php.net

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
P.S. Offtopic sorry funny things are allowed as off topic posts :) Derick Such as Derick's cross dressing tendancies? heh :P [sorry, couldnt resist] Where the hell did that come from? :) -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit:

RE: [PHP-DEV] wassup with master.php

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
if you'd been paying attention, you would have noticed that the machine it's on is down right now. -- james Hi, is someone working on master.php.net or what? -- Merci de nous avoir choisi. - Thanks you for your choice. Nicos - CHAILLAN Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [PHP-DEV] wassup with master.php

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
- Hébergement de sites Internet James Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you'd been paying attention, you would have noticed that the machine it's on is down right now. -- james Hi, is someone working on master.php.net or what

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
At 22:52 02/09/2002, Dan Kalowsky wrote: On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: If we should reduce number of modules built by default, 1st module should be MySQL. Removing MySQL does not cause any technical problems at all. I'll agree to that as well. +1 on removing

RE: [PHP-DEV] Default extensions (was: mbstring)

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
Unfortunately we don't live in a perfect world where sysadmins know how to read and listen to their users requests. That's why mysql for example is enabled by default. (or that's the main reasoning behind it at least) And we can't educate people or force them to

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: mbstring

2002-09-02 Thread James Cox
I think that the problem is caused by --enable-mbstr-enc-trans option and is not caused by mbstring itself. If --enable-mbstr-enc-trans is enabled, php_treat_data, the original handler of user input (POST/GET/Cookie), is overrided by mbstr_treat_data in ext/mbstring , the multibyte

[PHP-DEV] I'm Back

2002-09-01 Thread James Cox
For those who may be interested, I am back from my trip to California, and am going through mails. --James -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://james.blogs.at/ Was I helpful? http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/wishlist/23IVGHQ61RJGO/ -- PHP Development Mailing List http

[PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-01 Thread James Cox
. Let us STOP burdening default builds with crap that is unlikely to be used. -- james -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://james.blogs.at/ Was I helpful? http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/wishlist/23IVGHQ61RJGO/ -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-01 Thread James Cox
I do have one request, when the time comes to remove it from the default also change the PHP core code so that it can be built as a shared extension and loaded on the fly. Currently it can only be compiled into PHP statically and building it as .so means hacking the PHP source and the

RE: [PHP-DEV] mbstring

2002-09-01 Thread James Cox
So I want to 'disable' it by default. If you want encoding, just enable it. But you're right, i've never needed to create a truely globalized/localized app. (and from general principles, if you feel you need to localize any more than your ui/strings.) That's not what I read, perhaps

Re: [PHP-DEV] Accounts on Alpha/Tru64

2002-08-15 Thread James Cox
Sebastian Nohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm currently trying to get a machine for testing PHP on Tru64/Alpha. Anyone who is _really_ interested in testing AND hunting bugs on that platform should drop me a mail. http://www.testdrive.compaq.com/

RE: [PHP-DEV] 0 size snaps?

2002-08-02 Thread James Cox
This should be fixed. -- James Sebastian Nohn schrieb: http://snaps.php.net/php4-200207311500.tar.gz http://snaps.php.net/php4-200207311500.tar.bz2 And alle the -latested + the last STABLE Files have 0 size. The snaps are still broken and the last one is still from 07/31/2002

RE: [PHP-DEV] Scripts running on two different browsers crashes the server

2002-07-31 Thread James Cox
Please note that I am using the PHP development version 4.0.8. Ananth, Can I ask why you guys are using such an old version of PHP? Thanks, James -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.2.3RC1 ?

2002-07-28 Thread James Cox
the large amount of time between the branches. Yes. That may be. But there are a lot of bugfixes in the latest STABLE-snapshot I tested (26/07/02) - or exactly: All bugs I experienced were fixed. So the easiest thing would be to cancel all new features that were planned for 4.2.3 and move

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.2.3RC1 ?

2002-07-28 Thread James Cox
Following that, why not do what a number of people do, and do major.minor.patch major releases say every 6 months minor ones every 2 - unless serious patch required patches as required This allows people to predict the times also. i would see this working, given it's what we do already.

RE: [PHP-DEV] beginner question: how to execute unix command in PHP

2002-07-23 Thread James Cox
Hi, I'm just starting to learn PHP. I couldn't find how to exec unix command and read the result. Basically, I just want to execute ls -lrt and read and display the output. This may be very simple question, but for some reason, I couldn't find any info on executing unix command from

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Security Advisory: Vulnerability in PHP versions 4.2.0 and 4.2.1

2002-07-22 Thread James Cox
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Rouvas Stathis wrote: Hi all, Just wanting to notify everyone that the link for the PHP.4.2.2 download is broken. From which mirror, and how does your link look like? it's fixed. -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit:

RE: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: bobo

2002-07-15 Thread James Cox
Actually, Jason will be a primary contact at Rackshack for us (providing a new server), so is signing up to be able to help us out (and so he has a email address for peopel to mail him about this too). he just got in a bit early. :) -- james James Cox said I should sign up for one, since

RE: [PHP-DEV] MYSQL_UNIX_ADDR redefined

2002-07-02 Thread James Cox
can you email me a copy of your php_config.h and config.log, please? -- james -Original Message- From: Sebastian Bergmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 4:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PHP-DEV] MYSQL_UNIX_ADDR redefined In file included from

RE: [PHP-DEV] MYSQL_UNIX_ADDR redefined

2002-07-02 Thread James Cox
Jani Taskinen wrote: Your build stuff (gcc 3.1 installation done wrong?) is shitnitz. Hm, how come everything else works fine? this seems to be a problem with the MySQL build, not ours - they need to wrap their MYSQL_UNIX_ADDR definition around an #ifndef so if a previous configure does

RE: [PHP-DEV] MYSQL_UNIX_ADDR redefined

2002-07-02 Thread James Cox
After updating to autoconf 2.53 I get the following warnings: sb@wopr-mobile:/usr/src/php4 ./buildconf using default Zend directory buildconf: checking installation... buildconf: autoconf version 2.53 (ok) buildconf: automake version 1.5 (ok) buildconf: libtool

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Small CGI Serve

2002-06-19 Thread James Cox
I have found if you set the environment var REDIRECT_STATUS to FALSE then it works Someone explain? Having finally found out how to pass the Environment vars onto PHP, I am stumpted to find that PHP wasn't reading them and putting them in their place (GET vars). I tried changing

RE: [PHP-DEV] CVS fails to compile (ext/mysql)

2002-06-18 Thread James Cox
This would likely be me. what OS? can you give me a copy of config.log and php_config.h ? Thanks, -- James -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

RE: [PHP-DEV] Does (will?) php support BerkeleyDB4 yet?

2002-06-15 Thread James Cox
hi, is BerkelyDB4 supported in 5.8.0RC1? i note that -with-db has been deprecated, and that only -with-db2, -with-db3 and -with-dbm remain .. thanks for any comments/pointers. Hey, could i get a copy of 5.8.0RC1 please? -- james -- PHP Development Mailing List

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-EVANGELISM] ANN: QA Evangelism Call to Arms @ LinuxTag

2002-06-06 Thread James Cox
When everyone gets into linuxtag, we can work out the best time for a meeting and take it from there, i think. -- james ___ This mail sent using V-webmail - http://www.v-webmail.co.uk -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/

[PHP-DEV] php4/dl

2002-06-05 Thread James Cox
Guys, would anyone have a problem removing /php4/dl/ from cvs, (obviously backing it up somewhere) to reduce the amount of time for checkout? James -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: Landonize It! http://landonize.it/ Was I helpful? http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/wishlist

[PHP-DEV] ANN: QA Evangelism Call to Arms @ LinuxTag

2002-06-04 Thread James Cox
phone would be usefull) or call me on +44 7968 349990 from tomorrow (wed) onwards, i'll let you know where we're going to be. See you there! -- james -- James Cox :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: Landonize It! http://landonize.it/ Was I helpful? http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/wishlist/23IVGHQ61RJGO

RE: [PHP-DEV] PECL vs. CORE .... from a users perspective

2002-05-25 Thread James Cox
I have been developing PHP for about 3 years now. I am currently working on an application to help administrators to manage the ini file. I would like to contribute to this discussion, from a users/administrators point of view. Sorry if you have covered some of the points before ;) 1:

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP web farms (i.e. why msession or something like it)

2002-05-25 Thread James Cox
These topics usually don't interest the average PHP developer - why keep it in the same manual, then? What do you think about this? +1 - Maybe even consider adding to part 2 some documentation on developing PHP itself. Right now, one must read the few files on the Zend API, some coding

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/msession .cvsignore CREDITS README config.m4 msession-test.php msession.c msession.php php_msession.h reqclient.h

2002-05-24 Thread James Cox
(1) I am ticked off that the dicussion was not done on dev or cvs, I hope I speak for most of he people here when I say the decision to remove an extension from the ext/ directory should, no MUST, be done on dev and/or cvs so the actual extension maintainers can get wind of it. (2) There

RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/msession .cvsignore CREDITS README config.m4 msession-test.php msession.c msession.php php_msession.h reqclient.h

2002-05-24 Thread James Cox
the point being is that modules being maintained by the maintainer, and not everyone in general, should go into PECL (not just yours, we should be moving more slowly...) and those which are considered main main-stream, they should go in ext/) The point being that I didn't put almost

  1   2   >