On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Andrey Hristov wrote:
Few minutes ago I found the following behaviour somehow wierd for me :
Known bug, the associativity of the ternary operator has been
broken since ages in the engine. It's on the won't be
fixed sheet, because of BC concerns.
- Sascha
- Original Message -
From: Sascha Schumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrey Hristov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Possible problem in the parser
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Andrey Hristov wrote:
Few minutes ago I found
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Andrey Hristov wrote:
Few minutes ago I found the following behaviour somehow wierd for me :
Known bug, the associativity of the ternary operator has been
broken since ages in the engine. It's on the won't be
fixed sheet, because of BC concerns.
Is it
The following :
?php
$a = 1;
$b = $a==1? 4,5:6;
printf(a[%d]b[%d]\n, $a, $b);
?
gives Parse error: parse error, unexpected ',' in /home/storage/ternary.php
on line 3
Similar C program compiles without problems.
Is this also known?
Andrey
P.S.
I obey I won't search for more such stuff today :)
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
The list could be renamed so that it is less confusing for
newbie PHP developers.
What is confusing with this description?
Internals list
A medium volume list for those who want to help out with the development
of PHP
(from
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Andrey Hristov wrote:
Few minutes ago I found the following behaviour somehow wierd for me :
?php
$a = 1;
$b = $a==1? 4:$a==2? 5:6;
printf(a[%d]b[%d]\n, $a, $b);
?
Prints :
a[1]b[5]
Similar C program :
main()
{
int a,b;
a = 1;
b =
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Jani Taskinen wrote:
It was a 7 hour period. And not only today,
this happens daily. (maybe not in this scale)
For me, even 1 OT email is too much.
(But it's propably just me, who is stupid enough to read
EVERY email coming here.)
I'm so
if even that description doesn't work, then nothing would work, not even
changing the name.
Well, it is obvious that some folks don't read that
description and simply move forward, because php-dev sounds
about right. They are PHP developers and so a list called
php-dev makes
On Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:41 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
The list could be renamed so that it is less confusing for
newbie PHP developers.
What is confusing with this description?
Internals list
A medium volume list for those who
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
if even that description doesn't work, then nothing would work, not even
changing the name.
Well, it is obvious that some folks don't read that
description and simply move forward, because php-dev sounds
about right. They are PHP
php-dev-team might lose a few..
- Original Message -
From: Sascha Schumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jani Taskinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Moderate PHP-DEV
if even that
Let's ask the mysql guys, they did change the name too. (I think that we
atleast agree that the noise is annoying, right?)
Not really. Maybe I'm more used to skipping noise.
- Sascha
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
Hi,
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
if even that description doesn't work, then nothing would work, not even
changing the name.
Well, it is obvious that some folks don't read that
description and simply move forward, because php-dev sounds
about right.
Sascha Schumann wrote:
if even that description doesn't work, then nothing would work, not even
changing the name.
Well, it is obvious that some folks don't read that
description and simply move forward, because php-dev sounds
about right. They are PHP developers and so a list
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Shane Caraveo wrote:
Aside from renaming the php-dev list, we should remove the 'PHP and Zend
Engine internals lists' from the regular mailing list page, put them in
a 'developers' section (name isn't important) that describes cvs access,
dev email lists, how to build
A couple thoughts
Aside from renaming the php-dev list, we should remove the 'PHP and
Zend
Engine internals lists' from the regular mailing list page, put them
in
a 'developers' section (name isn't important) that describes cvs
access,
dev email lists, how to build (ie. win32 libraries),
At 14:53 12.03.2003, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
I have 2 questions:
1. Do the interface functions have to be explicitly specified as
abstract?
interface Foo {
function bar();
}
Because this runs fine for me with no errors.
They don't have to (currently) I weote the tests with abstract as i
Aside from renaming the php-dev list, we should remove the 'PHP and Zend
[snip]
Sounds good.
Then another item that might be considered if it is not already done,
allowing posts only from those that have cvs access. A second
conditional list of allowed posters can be added that are
At 15:54 12.03.2003, l0t3k wrote:
im trying to do some namespace related experimentation but im getting the
Have a look at spl (http://marcus-boerger.de/php/ext/spl/) how that works
without modyfing the engine.
regards
marcus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe,
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
a class can only extend ONE class/interface but it can implement multiple
interfaces. If you ask me i would not allow extending interfaces at all.
That's what I was thinking too.
-Andrei http://www.gravitonic.com/
I propose a rename to php.c-internals.dev
This leaves no confusion, it is about developing in C and C++ the
language of PHP.
I think restricting to those with cvs accounts is not the best solution.
It excludes first-time users who have a useful patch from posting a
message.
Regards,
Greg
At 18:42 12.03.2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Andrey Hristov wrote:
Few minutes ago I found the following behaviour somehow wierd for me :
?php
$a = 1;
$b = $a==1? 4:$a==2? 5:6;
printf(a[%d]b[%d]\n, $a, $b);
?
Prints :
a[1]b[5]
Similar C program :
main()
Then another item that might be considered if it is not already done,
allowing posts only from those that have cvs access. A second
conditional list of allowed posters can be added that are people who do
not have cvs access, but we want to allow to post. Otherwise, the list
can be
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
I have seen extended interfaces quite often in the Java world.
IIRC, the following code currently runs without problems and it should
stay that way, if it does not harm us in any way:
?php
interface Foo {}
interface Bar
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 12:50, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Let's ask the mysql guys, they did change the name too. (I think that we
atleast agree that the noise is annoying, right?)
Not really. Maybe I'm more used to skipping noise.
*exactly* my point btw. We skip noise, skip noise, skip
At 18:50 12.03.2003, Steph wrote:
php-dev-team might lose a few..
...think f..ing hard..read.oh php-dev-team...thinkCOOL, they solve my
problem, i'm getting better at it and finally a team member COOL
what ever name we give this list draws attention to newbies as long as it
contains the
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sterling Hughes wrote:
It doesn't. They are free to send the mail to whomever they like, even
put up a website with their ideas. They are not censured, they are
restricted. In what country can you walk onto the floor of the congress
(parliament) without sponsorship?
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
class blah implements interface is confusing.
That is possible? It shouldn't be ;-)
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/
--
PHP
A couple thoughts
Aside from renaming the php-dev list, we should remove the 'PHP and Zend
Engine internals lists' from the regular mailing list page, put them in a
'developers' section (name isn't important) that describes cvs access, dev
email lists, how to build (ie. win32 libraries),
So how about a first post response system, similar to the subscription
response. That first post would not actually be posted to the email
list, but rather an email would be sent back to the poster stating the
purpose of the email list, and what kind of materials are expected on
the list.
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
I have seen extended interfaces quite often in the Java world.
IIRC, the following code currently runs without problems and it should
stay that way, if it does not harm us in any way:
?php
interface Foo {}
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:47:27 -0800
Shane Caraveo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how about a first post response system, similar to the subscription
response. That first post would not actually be posted to the email
list, but rather an email would be sent back to the poster stating the
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Magnus [ISO-8859-1] M ![ISO-8859-1] gnus X^B wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:47:27 -0800
Shane Caraveo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how about a first post response system, similar to the subscription
response. That first post would not actually be posted to the email
This worries me somewhat. I do not have a CVS account. I do not
actively develop and contribute to the PHP sourcecode right now,
however my company uses php very very much. I would like to keep up to
date on what is happening with the development team and figuring out
what directions they are
snip
If the post does not match this criteria, please send it to
on of the other lists, otherwise respond to this email and your
original
message will go out.
And they would probably not read it, just read the part how to get the
email
to the list. They don't read the comment what purpose
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 14:00, Weston Houghton wrote:
This worries me somewhat. I do not have a CVS account. I do not
actively develop and contribute to the PHP sourcecode right now,
however my company uses php very very much. I would like to keep up to
date on what is happening with the
This worries me somewhat. I do not have a CVS account. I do not
actively develop and contribute to the PHP sourcecode right now,
however my company uses php very very much. I would like to keep up to
date on what is happening with the development team and figuring out
what directions they are
A secondary followup, as I do work on php extensions, I do think that
questions regarding those would fall to this list, but again might not
require a cvs account?
Just playing Devil's Advocate to some extent here.
Wes
On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 01:45 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
On
Shane Caraveo wrote:
Then another item that might be considered if it is not already done,
allowing posts only from those that have cvs access. A second
conditional list of allowed posters can be added that are people who
do not have cvs access, but we want to allow to post. Otherwise, the
Yes, because getting a cvs account is just *s* hard.
The problem is that you easily lose valuable postings when
you force people to go through some restrictive system.
I'm especially worried about inter-group communication. E.g.
where php-dev is involved in a discussion
At 19:57 12.03.2003, Shane Caraveo wrote:
A class extending an interface seems just weird to me. classes should
only extend classes, and implement interfaces. interfaces can extend
interfaces. I haven't been following the interfaces stuff (I'm going to
have to backtrack and read it all, very
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Shane Caraveo wrote:
But for the sake of writing...here's another idea.
So how about a first post response system, similar to the subscription
response. That first post would not actually be posted to the email
list, but rather an email would be sent back to the
At 20:00 12.03.2003, Weston Houghton wrote:
This worries me somewhat. I do not have a CVS account. I do not actively
develop and contribute to the PHP sourcecode right now, however my company
uses php very very much. I would like to keep up to date on what is
happening with the development
You lose:
You lose time for implementing and maintaining this system,
and you lose time for moderating emails. You also reduce the
incentive to contribute.
Again, let's take the less intrusive steps first and leave
the heavy handed ones as a last resort.
- Sascha
--
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
You lose:
You lose time for implementing and maintaining this system,
and you lose time for moderating emails. You also reduce the
incentive to contribute.
I lose time to reply to them now too and copy and pasting my stuff, I
lose
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
interface JAZ {}
interface FOO {}
interface BAR extends FOO {}
class foo implements FOO {}
This works even though i do not like extends FOO.
Why? Both C# and Java (AFAIR) allow interfaces to extend other
interfaces.
This doesn't - i hope -
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:14:03 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of this it might be a better idea to make somebody's first post
moderated, after it has been approved the poster is added to the allow
list, if not he gets back a message like I copypaste everytime now
At 20:20 12.03.2003, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
This works even though i do not like extends FOO.
Why? Both C# and Java (AFAIR) allow interfaces to extend other
interfaces.
Because of the second part of the answer. It is a little bit strange that
an
Marcus Börger wrote:
At 20:20 12.03.2003, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
This works even though i do not like extends FOO.
Why? Both C# and Java (AFAIR) allow interfaces to extend other
interfaces.
Because of the second part of the answer. It is a little bit
At 08:53 AM 3/12/2003 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
I have 2 questions:
1. Do the interface functions have to be explicitly specified as
abstract?
Nope. It shouldn't be allowed to be abstract because it's abstract by
definition.
interface Foo {
function bar();
}
Because this runs
We'll see who reads this, any responses are welcome.
I see a few different issues here:
1) People who want answers for a php-general message post it to the
development forum. This is clearly because they do not understand the
difference, as I doubt anyone wants to waste their own time posting a
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:31:56 -0500, John Coggeshall wrote:
In
any case, moderating this list would end up completely alientating
everyone but those who are significant developers.
I agree, I think changing the name is the way to go, and to remove it from
the public mailing lists (or put it
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Yes, because getting a cvs account is just *s* hard.
The problem is that you easily lose valuable postings when
you force people to go through some restrictive system.
I'm especially worried about inter-group communication.
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 17:59, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Of about 20 emails today, 6 were posted to wrong mailing
list. And one of those generated a 5 email thread about not
posting to wrong mailing list. (counting this one :)
So I suggest we finally make this list MODERATED.
Aside from renaming the php-dev list, we should remove the 'PHP and
Zend
Engine internals lists' from the regular mailing list page, put them
in
a 'developers' section (name isn't important) that describes cvs
access,
dev email lists, how to build (ie. win32 libraries), etc.
As a newbie
This discussion itself is creating more spam than those emails people send.
I agree with Sascha that we shouldn't take drastic measures. We still want
to make it easy for people to join the PHP developer's community.
I think the most interesting idea so far was Shane's first post response
At 04:17 PM 3/12/2003 -0500, David Hill \(php.net\) wrote:
As a newbie commiter, still wet behind the ears, I would have *really*
appreciated a page that was a little clearer and a bit more up to date
than what I started with. My sources of information README.CVS-RULES,
the building from cvs web
* trying to build php4 head for two days, only to be told that I
should be building PHP_4_3 or php5 head.
Yes, it should be noted that you can use PHP_4, PHP_4_3 or
php5.
* forgetting about re2c, which is not mentioned anywhere that I could
find, but I found through freshmeat and had
After reading all the comments, I came to conclusion that
we will do the following compromise:
1. Rename the list to php-group
2. Separate the list entries in mailing-lists.php [DONE!]
3. Apply the same system as is in use for
our @php.net addresses for
Seeing as how we now have only one-level deep namespaces and classes
(which is another topic), does it make sense to have both 'scope' and
'ns' fields in zend_op_array structure? I would think they can be merged
into one.
I still want to hear from Zeev about lack of nested classes/namespaces..
Jani,
1. Rename the list to php-group
bad name for obvious reasons. Georg's suggestion of
internals sounds ok to me. Or hackers from the FreeBSD
community.
2. Separate the list entries in mailing-lists.php [DONE!]
3. Apply the same system as is in use for
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Jani,
1. Rename the list to php-group
bad name for obvious reasons. Georg's suggestion of
internals sounds ok to me. Or hackers from the FreeBSD
community.
internals,hackers,whatever, as long as it's not php-dev. :)
I wouldn't consider 3rd one that drastic.
It has worked very well for me, I haven't got any spam
to my php.net addy, but people who really wanted to send me
email got through..
Well, maybe I am an exception, but I usually don't bother to
register myself anywhere,
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:44:20 +0200 (EET), Jani Taskinen wrote:
1. Rename the list to php-group
And the newsgroup? since lots of the spam comes from NNTP directly, I would
think(?)
--
Tom Sommer, denmark
www.tsn.dk - www.dreamcoder.dk
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
I wouldn't consider 3rd one that drastic.
It has worked very well for me, I haven't got any spam
to my php.net addy, but people who really wanted to send me
email got through..
Well, maybe I am an exception, but I usually don't
At 21:12 12.03.2003, Shane Caraveo wrote:
An interface should not implement an interface, only classes should
implement interfaces. 'implement' infers that actual executable code is
provided that implements an interface. Again, I haven't followed the
interface stuff, and sorry for writting
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:39:36 - (GMT), you wrote:
but your not. Please redirect further rants to [EMAIL PROTECTED] where
they will be able to help.
Careful...devnull.com is an actual domain. :-) Although giveashit
doesn't seem to exist:
550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown
--
PHP
J, I will post an issue, but as far as I can tell the error is very
intermittent. I don't have a consistent action that I do each time to cause
the error. It is just randomly (as far as I can tell) throughout the
application.
But If you like I'll send some through
J Smith wrote:
How about
Hi all.
This bug was marked as Bogus, but is a real concern for us at ABR, as we may
use many different databases on different servers in the course of generating
a page using php.
The long and the short of it is, we can't get an error message if connecting
to a database fails, after we have
Marcus,
i tried to use spl_functions.c and got the same errors. i think that
because im building php as shared that those symbols must be exported for my
code to work.
l0t3k
Marcus Börger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 15:54 12.03.2003, l0t3k wrote:
im trying to
At 11:01 PM 3/12/2003 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
I wouldn't consider 3rd one that drastic.
It has worked very well for me, I haven't got any spam
to my php.net addy, but people who really wanted to send me
email got through..
Well, maybe I am an exception, but I usually
We don't lose anything by giving the first two items some
time to prove their usefullness. On the other hand, it is
very likely that we will lose useful input, if we implement
the third item prematurely.
I disagree. Anyone here can handle replying because we already have
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 11:01 PM 3/12/2003 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
I wouldn't consider 3rd one that drastic.
It has worked very well for me, I haven't got any spam
to my php.net addy, but people who really wanted to send me
email got
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Tom Sommer wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:44:20 +0200 (EET), Jani Taskinen wrote:
1. Rename the list to php-group
And the newsgroup? since lots of the spam comes from NNTP directly, I would
think(?)
Some does, but not a lot.
Derick
--
I think, on web page is bad text. User's don't know if is it for PHP
developers or about _PHP_ developers..
Jan
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Of about 20 emails today, 6 were posted to wrong mailing
list. And one of those
Hi,
I compiled CLI version of PHP_4_3 this morning and it gave the following:
php4/main/main.c:225: undefined reference to `zend_disable_class'
php4/main/main.c:239: undefined reference to `zend_disable_class'
Is this right ? won't PHP_4_3 compile with Zend version 1 anymore ?
Corne'
!Exclude
Did you actually check out version 4.3?
cvs co -r PHP_4_3 php4
Check your CVS/Entries file. You should see the branch name after each
file.
-Rasmus
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Corne' Cornelius wrote:
Hi,
I compiled CLI version of PHP_4_3 this morning and it gave the following:
Hi Corne,
The latest stable works fine for CLI from http://snaps.php.net/
Regards
--jm
-Original Message-
From: Corne' Cornelius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 9:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP-DEV] compiling PHP_4_3
Hi,
I compiled CLI
Yep, it's branch PHP_4_3 and ran a cvs update just before compiling
-Corne'
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Did you actually check out version 4.3?
cvs co -r PHP_4_3 php4
Check your CVS/Entries file. You should see the branch name after each
file.
-Rasmus
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Corne' Cornelius wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/php4/main$ cvs status main.c
===
File: main.cStatus: Up-to-date
Working revision:1.512.2.16
Repository revision: 1.512.2.16 /repository/php4/main/main.c,v
Sticky Tag: PHP_4_3
Is PHP designed (have the capability) to access remote DB?
Is there any PHP developer willing to answer the question?
./pl
PHP can access any database that the server that PHP is running on can get
to and has the correct permissions to get to the database.
Clint
-Original Message-
From: Patrick LOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 7:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Stop posting user questions to the php-dev and php5-dev list, as I
explained before.
Derick
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Patrick LOK wrote:
Is PHP designed (have the capability) to access remote DB?
Is there any PHP developer willing to answer the question?
./pl
--
It is possible to connect a remote db server using x_connect?
e.g. a PostgreSQL in server PSQLDB, ip=192.168.0.100 and a MSSQL server MSSQLDB,
ip=192.168.0.110
I tried pgsql_connect(psqldb,administrator,)
pgsql_connect(192.168.0.100,administrator,) but failed!
Error is Unable to connect
On Tuesday, Mar 11, 2003, at 03:35 Europe/Copenhagen, Nathan
Fredrickson wrote:
Hi,
Is the CVS source out of date for gettext extension? The distributed
php_gettext.dll dynamically loads libintl-1.dll. The php_gettext.dll
I
built from the CVS source is linked to gnu_gettext.lib.
How can I
Renamed OnUpdateInt - OnUpdateLong to prevent further misunderstandings.
# Intentionally left out any 'alias' for it, this way 3rd party extension
# maintainers will really NOTICE the change.
wl, right now the default php4 tree is broken for cygwin, is this what did u expected
to gain?
Hi all. I'm trying to deal with Regular Expressions, but somehow it is
getting more difficult. I´m trying to do the folowing:
Read a text and get all of the PHP code out of it, highlight it and then
print all in nice HTML. I'm using this to get the PHP code:
ereg(\?.*\?,$Text,$PHP_code);
It
Hello,
please forward user questions to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailinglist, this list is for development _OF_ PHP, not development
_with_ PHP.
Derick
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, fLIPIS wrote:
Hi all. I'm trying to deal with Regular Expressions, but somehow it is
getting more difficult. I´m trying
Even so, its a very good idea to use streams for this; you will
automatically make your extension safe_mode and open_basedir aware,
virtual cwd aware and be able to avoid crippling limitations of certain
OS (eg: Solaris can only fopen 256 files).
These things are particularly important in a web
Hi all. I'm trying to deal with Regular Expressions, but somehow it is
getting more difficult. I´m trying to do the folowing:
Read a text and get all of the PHP code out of it, highlight it and then
print all in nice HTML. I'm using this to get the PHP code:
ereg(\?.*\?,$Text,$PHP_code);
It
Hello,
please forward user questions to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailinglist, this list is for development _OF_ PHP, not development
_with_ PHP.
Derick
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, fLIPIS wrote:
Hi all. I'm trying to deal with Regular Expressions, but somehow it is
getting more difficult. I´m trying
i suggest that we implement the constants NaN, as well as INFINITY (pos and
neg if the RTL supports it). i have need of them in an extension, but they
should be implemented in core or ext/standard.
l0t3k
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
With the latest ZE2:
?php
class Bar {
function boo()
{
::zoo();
}
}
Bar::boo();
?
-Andrei http://www.gravitonic.com/
The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck,
is probably the day Microsoft starts making vacuum cleaners.
Your cvs checkout is broken:
# cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/repository co php5
And it works fine.
--Jani
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, moshe doron wrote:
Renamed OnUpdateInt - OnUpdateLong to prevent further misunderstandings.
# Intentionally left out
Er, wrong patch. Proper one is attached.
J
I wrote:
The browscap extension is trying to load stuff into the object_store
before it gets initialized, so this'll fix it. Entries from the
browscap.ini file are now stored in straight hashes rather than objects,
but the return value is still
Jani Taskinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still don't think we should be linking with libocijdbc8 in any case.
Can you ask some Oracle support why their libs differ with same version
but in different OSes??
I can try to do so [1], although I don't see what that will buy us.
From
Hi,
the following script makes this morning's CVS segfault:
?php require_once DB.php; ?
DB.php is from the latest release of PEAR::DB. I can not provide a
backtrace at the moment, but if you need one, just drop a mail.
--
- Martin Martin Jansen
I think the patch is OK. I'm not extremely happy with it because I don't
think it's very beautiful but I didn't have time to think of a better way
of fixing it.
I think he can go ahead and commit it but I'd like there to be comments in
the source code to explain why those checks on
Martin Jansen wrote:
?php require_once DB.php; ?
Most likely this will be caused by
856 $this-$key = $arr[$key];
as variable member access causes a segfault in the compiler.
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Did I
Hi again,
I am looking at the flex check in configure.in again. If flex is not
present, or is not version 2.5.4 then you may get your environment
dumped to stdout while running configure. This is due to the set command
being run with no arguments.
Although non-fatal - it certainly is
101 - 200 of 43526 matches
Mail list logo
