Not to beat a dead horse, but I'm glad someone else noticed this. I
almost went back to bed, thinking the whole world had gone mad. :)
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote the following to Zeev Suraski :
> >tagged as experimental makes it easier for us to change the API to a
> >PHP-like API,
At 08:21 PM 6/24/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>What new functionality? Why the hell should the API change?
>Only the function names should have been changed, not break
>the whole extension!
It's a rewrite which is more in the PHP spirit. i.e. return true/false and
not -1/0 and stuff like th
At 03:23 25/6/2001, Brian Tanner wrote:
>Considering a very low % of PHP programmers have extensive C socket
>experience, I wouldn't worry too much about making it inconvenient. You
>guys are just a little biased (IMHO), because you are all talented,
>experienced, C programmers.
Not all of us a
are all talented,
>experienced, C programmers.
>
>Anyway.. basically just wanted to say that I have used the new API, it works
>well, and I was very happy to see sockets making it to windows.
>
>-Brian Tanner
>
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-----
>From: Sascha
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>At 22:10 24/6/2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>>So this is broken now only on *nix? Nice.
>>Previously it worked only on unices, now it works only on win32?
>>What an improvement.
>
>Let's keep cynicism off this list, please...
:-p
>About the socket extensio
rom: Sascha Schumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: June 24, 2001 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] About ext/sockets/
Jeroen,
> For lower-scale and home-use you can argue it is easier
> than *nix. So when possible, you should try to support w
Sascha,
PHP is an established language on its own now, with failure semantics of
its own. Failure in PHP is noted by false and resource (i.e. anything
which is not a language primitive or composite type) are contained in
IS_RESOURCE handles. The original socket implementation was wrong in th
At 22:10 24/6/2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>So this is broken now only on *nix? Nice.
>Previously it worked only on unices, now it works only on win32?
>What an improvement.
Let's keep cynicism off this list, please...
About the socket extension - this was discussed, and agreed upon that the
way
Jeroen,
> For lower-scale and home-use you can argue it is easier
> than *nix. So when possible, you should try to support windows.
[..]
> > [looked like C, was easier for ppl with C-background]
>
> I don't think you should target php at C-ppl.
PHP has been since its inception strongly i
> -Original Message-
> From: sterling hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 9:49 PM
> To: Lukas Beeler
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] About ext/sockets/
>
>
> On 24 Jun 2001 21:40:19 +0200, Lukas Beeler wrote:
&g
> [don't break the API!]
> >i'd vote not for changing the api back, rather than
> updating/extending the
> >yet available (tiny) sockets documentation.
>
> I vote we get the old api back. I don't care if it doesn't
> support win32.
1) IMHO the new API is better (the 'write' function is really a
On 24 Jun 2001 21:40:19 +0200, Lukas Beeler wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jani Taskinen
> > Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 9:11 PM
> > To: Daniel Beulshausen
> > Cc: [
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jani Taskinen
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 9:11 PM
> To: Daniel Beulshausen
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] About ext/sockets/
>
>
> On Sun, 2
At 21:10 24.06.2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Daniel Beulshausen wrote:
>
> >the issue that made the extension break was the step from resources to
> >longs for the socket fd's, this was necessary as win32 socket fd's are
> >different from bsd style socket fd's.
>
>So this
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Daniel Beulshausen wrote:
>the issue that made the extension break was the step from resources to
>longs for the socket fd's, this was necessary as win32 socket fd's are
>different from bsd style socket fd's.
So this is broken now only on *nix? Nice.
Previously it worked onl
At 20:58 24.06.2001 +0200, Daniel Beulshausen wrote:
>jani,
>
>At 20:21 24.06.2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
>>What new functionality? Why the hell should the API change?
>>Only the function names should have been changed, not break
>>the whole extension!
>
>the issue that made the extension b
> > Because of the experimental status, I don't think phpdev should worry
too
> > much about the
> > incompatibility, it's the user's own reponsibility to use an
experimental
> > module.
>
> Taking a look at the changes to the sockets extension, some break things
> on a Linux system, some don't wo
jani,
At 20:21 24.06.2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>What new functionality? Why the hell should the API change?
>Only the function names should have been changed, not break
>the whole extension!
the issue that made the extension break was the step from resources to
longs for the socket fd's
What new functionality? Why the hell should the API change?
Only the function names should have been changed, not break
the whole extension!
--Jani
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>Maybe we should wait with this whole API change until a new sub-version?
>4.1? Or keep the old function
On 24 Jun 2001 17:43:02 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The documentation has just been updated, stating that the sockets-module is
> still experimental.
> As has any module having an EXPERIMENTAL file in it's directory.
>
> Because of the experimental status, I don't think phpdev should worry
The documentation has just been updated, stating that the sockets-module is
still experimental.
As has any module having an EXPERIMENTAL file in it's directory.
Because of the experimental status, I don't think phpdev should worry too
much about the
incompatibility, it's the user's own reponsibil
Maybe we should wait with this whole API change until a new sub-version?
4.1? Or keep the old functionality right now and just add the new
functions? We can deprecate the old ones in 4.1.
Andi
At 03:03 PM 6/24/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>Since everybody seems to be using some stupid fil
22 matches
Mail list logo
