I thought we discussed that any error/warning message MUST
cause a test to fail. If you look at the diffs you will see that. And
that we do not use logging but direct displaying for that.
And again when special tests fail because a warning is emitted
you should either use --INI-- to disable
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Zeev Suraski wrote:
Please revert.
There is no need.
Derick has been changed it w/o discussion.
Nice joke :)
Don't you forget I've posted I'll change it?
I get reply only from you, though. Old code was
bogus as everyone
Matus Fantomas Uhlar wrote:
(B Therefore I propose a change:
(B
(B PHP_INI_SYSTEM variables should be allowed to change by admin - in
(B system-wide php.ini or httpd.conf, no matter if it's VHost or not.
(B
(BI've never tried to use php_value/php_admin_value/php_flag/php_admin_flag
(Bin
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
There is no need.
Derick has been changed it w/o discussion.
Nice joke :)
Don't you forget I've posted I'll change it?
I get reply only from you, though. Old code was
bogus
Derick Rethans wrote:
Your patch made impossible to turn off implicit
flushing at all. I know you've modified code at very
late stage of discussion to fix it, even if I've
mentioned the problem number of times.
That is not even true, you always could disable that hardcoded setting
by passing
That would be ideal :)
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Wez Furlong wrote:
If you need to comment on a commit, can you please change the To/Cc line
from php-cvs to php-dev.
I think we can instruct the listmanager to set a Reply-To header
instead, would
Even stricter and be sure,
prevent post from users like php-bugs?
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
Wez Furlong wrote:
That would be ideal :)
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Wez Furlong wrote:
If you need to comment on a commit, can you please change the To/Cc line
from
Hello!
I've been trying to use the go-pear WebInstaller with some lack of success.
On Win2k running php 4.2.2 I get the folowing:
Downloading package: PEAR.ok
Downloading package: Archive_Tar..ok
Downloading package: Console_Getoptok
Downloading package: XML_RPC..ok
This worked fine! Thanks for this input.
- Ananth.
Edin Kadribasic [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/29/02 03:18PM
Adding folder is not enough. You need to add the files within the
folder as well.
Hope this helps,
Edin
- Original Message -
From: Ananth Kesari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Even stricter and be sure,
prevent post from users like php-bugs?
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
Wez Furlong wrote:
That would be ideal :)
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Wez Furlong wrote:
If you need to comment on a commit,
The aspect people complaining about is more a version thingie, e.g.
they try to set up php 4.2.3 with apache 2.0.43 and this could not
succeed. Is it really necessary to document that apache 2.03x works
only with php 4.2.x1, php4.2.x2 and apache 2.04x only with php4.2y1
or php4.2.y2? It
At 08:43 29-10-2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
The aspect people complaining about is more a version thingie, e.g.
they try to set up php 4.2.3 with apache 2.0.43 and this could not
succeed. Is it really necessary to document that apache 2.03x works
only with php 4.2.x1, php4.2.x2 and apache 2.04x
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
At 08:43 29-10-2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
I think, it would be nice to add information to one place, the documentation
about Apache 2 support.
1. It's not production ready
Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to the best version yet
Hallo Melvyn,
Tuesday, October 29, 2002, 9:55:31 AM, you wrote:
At 08:43 29-10-2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
The aspect people complaining about is more a version thingie, e.g.
they try to set up php 4.2.3 with apache 2.0.43 and this could not
succeed. Is it really necessary to document
Hello!
I've been trying to use the go-pear WebInstaller with some lack of success.
On Win2k running php 4.2.2 I get the folowing:
Downloading package: PEAR.ok
Downloading package: Archive_Tar..ok
Downloading package: Console_Getoptok
Downloading package: XML_RPC..ok
Hi,
I think the test case /tests/strings/003.phpt should be placed in
/ext/standard/tests/strings and renamed as htmlentities.phpt .
Are there any objections?
Moriyoshi
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Why use error_prepend_string error_append_string OnUndateStringUnempty?
Shouldn`t they use OnUpdateString instead what is wanted in run-tests.php?
marcus
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Mybe you can also remove --GET-- and --POST-- and add --SKIPIF-- for
setlocale() failure and missing --INI--. I guess you know best which settings
affect this test.
marcus
At 15:12 29.10.2002, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Hi,
I think the test case /tests/strings/003.phpt should be placed in
On 10/29/02, Marcus B?rger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Use // instead of /* ... */ comments
Why?
#this test fails for me. Very weired...
You changed the test.
Why not ask me first about it failing?
--Wez.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
I started to work on that issue. My first attempt was to check where and
why the test failed. I used the comment modification because it seems
the test fails due to some internal failure.
The reason i did not ask you before was that i considered my changes
a kind of whitespace change so that any
It should work fine, as long as you use the php_admin directives.
At 21:50 20/10/2002, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
Hello,
I found out that it is not possible with current php stable version (4.2.3)
to define some configuration variables per virtual host - e.g.
upload_tmp_dir.
The
I think we need to discuss the behaviour of run-tests.php
according too error/warning handling a bit.
First question (let me know if i am wrong): Any error/warning/
notice in a test result is either expected or a real error.
To make that clear: Yes some tests failed after i made those
visible
Lets stick to C comments, as those are the preference listed in
coding standards (and C++ style comments are really only intended
for single line out-commenting anyhow).
The test works fine here; it relies on output buffering working correctly;
when the test passes you see only the expected
On October 29, 2002 09:52 am, Marcus Boerger wrote:
I think we need to discuss the behaviour of run-tests.php
according too error/warning handling a bit.
First question (let me know if i am wrong): Any error/warning/
notice in a test result is either expected or a real error.
Agreed, however
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Ilia A. wrote:
On October 29, 2002 09:52 am, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Remark 2: We could instead use the log_errors and direct them to the output
with the following changes to above settings:
display_errors=0
log_errors=1
The output would be nicer but when we go
This test fails with adding
--INI--
output_buffering=0
output_handler=
zlib.output_compression=
implicit_flush=0
and even when removing the three calls to ob_xxx89
At 15:59 29.10.2002, Wez Furlong wrote:
Lets stick to C comments, as those are the preference listed in
coding standards (and C++
On 10/29/02, Marcus Börger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This test fails with adding
--INI--
output_buffering=0
output_handler=
zlib.output_compression=
implicit_flush=0
Works fine here.
and even when removing the three calls to ob_xxx89
Can you email me the output?
Also, could you strace it
At 16:14 29.10.2002, Ilia A. wrote:
On October 29, 2002 09:52 am, Marcus Boerger wrote:
I think we need to discuss the behaviour of run-tests.php
according too error/warning handling a bit.
First question (let me know if i am wrong): Any error/warning/
notice in a test result is either
Hi,
why result the functions phpinfo() and phpcredits() as plain text
when i set the html_error = Off.
I think this is not the correct behavior, or not?
Regards,
Steve
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 10:14 10/29/2002 -0500, Ilia A. wrote:
Adding to block the errors is not a good approach imho, the warning should
be displayed and accounted for in the expected output.
If your testing foo_function, it's useless when bar_function() is
generating verbose
warnings, so that the foo_function
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Steve Alberty wrote:
why result the functions phpinfo() and phpcredits() as plain text
when i set the html_error = Off.
I think this is not the correct behavior, or not?
It is the correct behavior.
Derick
--
The following fixes the memory leak of domxml002.phpt test.
marcus
cvs -z3 -q diff php_domxml.c (in directory S:\php4-HEAD\ext\domxml\)
Index: php_domxml.c
===
RCS file: /repository/php4/ext/domxml/php_domxml.c,v
retrieving revision
I'm seeing a memory overrun under PHP 4.3.0pre2 (debug) running under
Windows 2000 ISAPI. Using these two scripts:
test.php
html
head
link rel=stylesheet href=stylesheet.php type=text/css
/head
body
span class=textstyled!/span
/body
/html
stylesheet.php
--
?php
//
At 16:36 29.10.2002, Wez Furlong wrote:
On 10/29/02, Marcus Börger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This test fails with adding
--INI--
output_buffering=0
output_handler=
zlib.output_compression=
implicit_flush=0
Works fine here.
and even when removing the three calls to ob_xxx89
Can you email
Shouldn't there be different settings? People may very well want html
errors off, but still keep the rest of PHP 'web enabled'...
At 08:58 29/10/2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Steve Alberty wrote:
why result the functions phpinfo() and phpcredits() as plain text
when i set
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 09:51, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 02:49 PM 10/23/2002 -0500, David M. Lloyd wrote:
The reality of twos-complement, bitwise arithmatic is that there are
three basic shift operations: shift left, bitwise shift right, and
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Shouldn't there be different settings? People may very well want html
errors off, but still keep the rest of PHP 'web enabled'...
I was just stating that it was meant like this, if it should be like
this is another question :)
Derick
--
I'm seeing a memory overrun under PHP 4.3.0pre2 (debug) running under
Windows 2000 ISAPI. [ . . . ]
---
C:\Work\php-source\php-4.3.0pre2\ext\bcmath\libbcmath\src\init.c(72):
Freeing 0x01B85050 (1 bytes), script=c:\inetpub\wwwroot\test.php
Last leak
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Shouldn't there be different settings? People may very well want html
errors off, but still keep the rest of PHP 'web enabled'...
I've asked about this a few times..I guess it was easier
to use existing global than add new? :)
This
OK, so how about a backtrace ?
--Wez.
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Marcus [iso-8859-1] Börger wrote:
At 16:36 29.10.2002, Wez Furlong wrote:
Also, could you strace it too? (just to be sure)
old_mmap(NULL, 266240, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
0) = 0x407d5000
read(3, ...naq
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Shouldn't there be different settings? People may very well want html
errors off, but still keep the rest of PHP 'web enabled'...
I've asked about this a few times..I guess it was easier
to use
The tests can only be performed using the cgi/cli sapis since they require a
command line PHP binary. So, this is a non-issue. If we must display error
messages then I would prefer using display_errors=1 instead of log_errors=1.
Ilia
I'm working with another person on a web version of the
You are right. I screwed up. I have to make these TSRM globals.
I'll try and do it tomorrow.
Andi
At 09:44 AM 10/29/2002 -0800, Michael Sisolak wrote:
I'm seeing a memory overrun under PHP 4.3.0pre2 (debug) running under
Windows 2000 ISAPI. [ . . . ]
---
Hi, I'm writing a php's book for italian people. I need to know some
info about php 5.0. Any ideal time line ?? Tnx in advance.
Ah, how can I get the HEAD cvs ?
tnx
--
--
Vecchioni da ragazzo si chiamava Jovanotti ?
--
Michel ZioBudda Morelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ UIN: 58351764
(gdb) file /usr/src/php4-HEAD/sapi/cli/php
Reading symbols from /usr/src/php4-HEAD/sapi/cli/php...done.
(gdb) set args ext/standard/tests/file/userstreams.phpt
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/src/php4-HEAD/sapi/cli/php
ext/standard/tests/file/userstreams.phpt
[New Thread 1024 (LWP 13760)]
Hi, I'm writing a php's book for italian people. I need to know some
info about php 5.0. Any ideal time line ?? Tnx in advance.
This could be a help: http://www.zend.com/engine2/ZendEngine-2.0.pdf
Ah, how can I get the HEAD cvs ?
Probably at http://cvs.php.net/
Jome
--
PHP Development
Hi,
from http://www.zend.com/zend/week/week109.php:
---
TLK: sybase_ct maintainer
Timm Friebe has volunteered to take over maintenance of the sybase_ct
extension.
He has made a number of patches to the code (which can be seen
Shouldn't microtime and gettimeofday be unavailable
when HAVE_GETTIMEOFDAY is undefined?
PHP_FUNCTION(microtime)
{
#ifdef HAVE_GETTIMEOFDAY
...
#endif
RETURN_FALSE;
}
PHP_FUNCTION(gettimeofday)
{
#ifdef HAVE_GETTIMEOFDAY
...
#endif
RETURN_FALSE;
}
--
PHP Development Mailing List
On 29 Oct 2002, Timm Friebe wrote:
* Do I commit this against head or against php_4_3_0pre2?
(cvs com cvs tag -F php_4_3_0pre2 or simply cvs com)?
HEAD.
* buildconf says: You need bison version = 1.30 = 1.75 installed
to build PHP from CVS - I'm running FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE, bison
Of course.
--Jani
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Shouldn't microtime and gettimeofday be unavailable
when HAVE_GETTIMEOFDAY is undefined?
PHP_FUNCTION(microtime)
{
#ifdef HAVE_GETTIMEOFDAY
...
#endif
RETURN_FALSE;
}
PHP_FUNCTION(gettimeofday)
{
I am mainly interested in working on the manual; completing the german version (I am
german, never mind the email .li), clearing unclear passages etc.
But I also could imagine to do a little debugging
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
Is that ZE2?
There is no zend_assign_add_obj_handler function anywhere in my checkout
of HEAD + ZE1, and line 232 of zend_execute is a case statement in
my checkout.
I'm not concerned with ZE2 problems at this time (well, I am, but don't
have the time to support it). Most likely, this is an
Translating the documentation
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 11:30 10/29/2002 +0100, Friedhelm Betz wrote:
I think, it would be nice to add information to one place, the
documentation
about Apache 2 support.
1. It's not production ready
Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to the best version yet
marketing
trick the Apache Group is
1. It's not production ready
Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to the best version yet
marketing
trick the Apache Group is advertising on their front page.
We can mention it to users, in the bug db etc. But officially documenting,
that
Apache 2 is really a beta product, doesn't
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
As far as I can see, we should not not put into the PHP documentation that
Apache 2 is not production ready, but PHP is not production ready for
Apache 2.
But it's incorrect :). By saying Do not use Apache 2 and PHP in a
production environment you
Derick Rethans writes:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
As far as I can see, we should not not put into the PHP
documentation
that Apache 2 is not production ready, but PHP is not
production ready
for Apache 2.
But it's incorrect :). By saying Do not use Apache 2 and PHP
As far as I can see, we should not not put into the PHP
documentation
that Apache 2 is not production ready, but PHP is not
production ready
for Apache 2.
But it's incorrect :). By saying Do not use Apache 2 and PHP in a
production environment you don't blame any of the
I think, it would be nice to add information to one place, the
documentation
about Apache 2 support.
1. It's not production ready
Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to the best version yet
marketing
trick the Apache Group is advertising on their front page.
We
I did more work and testing with fastcgi and apache 2, and have php 4.3
running under apache 2. Since it's out of process, no multithread
issues which are one of the major issues. I didn't write docs, but
there are some in sapi/cgi/README.fastcgi
Shane
As far as I can see, we should not
Hi, this may be a bit late:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:12:55PM +0200, Sterling Hughes wrote :
* allowing persistent cURL handles that survive the request, for HTTP
1.1 persistent connections
Why only for persistent HTTP/1.1 connection and not other
type of curl resources like FTP
To join developing PHP.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi there, with not so much time to dedicate to php improvements and bug
fixes I want to have karma to help fix some bugs/improvements into php and
into bcompiler for win32 that is my speciallity.
I've already did a compile with windows but now I need to add some more
functionalities.
Alan
Ernani helped out with bcompiler - so karma on that is ok.
I think for php4 you will have to send patches to php-dev for the time
being. until they get used to you :)
Regards
Alan
Ernani Joppert Pontes Martins wrote:
Hi there, with not so much time to dedicate to php improvements and bug
I'll add the pear karma once I figure out which of his 2 cvs accounts he
uses.
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Alan Knowles wrote:
Ernani helped out with bcompiler - so karma on that is ok.
I think for php4 you will have to send patches to php-dev for the time
being. until they get used to you :)
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Shouldn't microtime and gettimeofday be unavailable
when HAVE_GETTIMEOFDAY is undefined?
IMO they should indeed not be available in that case.
Derick
--
---
Derick Rethans
66 matches
Mail list logo
