Lite is easy.
And what about mind, or mcrypt, or curl, or... or... There is simply too
much out there. I really think that bundling more is not the way to go
(maybe except for some xml thing... which I still won't like to
h
extensions as possible... so that isn't really feasible IMO.
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://www.derickrethans.nl/link.php?url=g
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Garland foster wrote:
> Derick et al,
>
> What about the native DBM support? Nobody answered that part.
I'm -1 on bundling anything, for the reason you will find in the archives
(no need to repeat them again).
Derick
> - Original Message
crashes because you're
> sending Headers that violate the spec, surely?
crash = bug, always
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://ww
Patch is done... now testing it.
Derick
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Yes, a clean way to force the response code would be good. You can
> currently do that by sending a header('HTTP/...') but a
> header('location...') call overrides this
plans. Having a road map up to PHP 7 is not really feasible, and IMO this
should never be removed.
Derick
---
Did I help you? http:/
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Philip Olson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Any idea if/when these variables won't be
> created by PHP?
What about never? :)
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://www.derickrethans.nl/link
on to use PHP standard logo, for
> example.
How would this help them, and what does it give us (The PHP team)?
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://www.der
?
ZE1 is branched into PHP_4_2_0 too, so it needs to be merged if 4.2.2 is
released.
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://www.derickrethans.nl/link.php?ur
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Ilia A. wrote:
> Would it be possible to include the fixes made by Andy to the
> zend_constants.c, which resolves at least 2 major bugs with constants?
I think you have the karma to do that yourself, so please proceed.
This is the wrong list to discusss this, please move to the php-general
list.
Derick
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Andrew Milne wrote:
> You could use javascript to grab the data from the various fields then
> use window.open adding the variables & values to the URL GET style.
>
>
ors to make their users invulnerable to
> > attacks which involve passing session ids in URLs.
> >
>
> I'm +1 for merge this patch to release branch.
-1 on that, as it's a new feature.
Derick
> > Index: php4/ext/session/php_session.h
> > diff -u php4/
On 10 Jun 2002, emil santos wrote:
> (phpdoc)
> Found the docs outdated; heard no one was working on them.
Which docs exactly you you mean... the ZendAPI docs?
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/
e) if it's possible to hold a siminar over PHP. The HCC days
> are normaly late november.
I would be interested in attending that, could you keep me (this list)
posted on it?
regards,
Derick
---
Hoi,
I committed this (and yesterday's fix).
Thanks!
Derick
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Rob Richards wrote:
> can someone apply this patch to cvs for me.
> it fixes a problem in domxml_dump_mem_file with xmlKeepBlanksDefault not
> being reset when the formatting parameter is true.
>
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> herewith i send my patch for the memory leak within ZendEngine(1/2).
> This was discussed with Zeev and Andi before but noone fixed it.
> So please apply the patch now, or give me the karma and I do it
> myself...
Committ
would have been nice if someone told me so. It's not just my
> development-related questions on this list that go unanswered.
Amen, those discussions are not only useless, but drain energy too. But
it's Open Source development :)
Derick
--
de that this means the double colon :)
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=giftlist
Frequent ranting: http://www.jdimed
gs more important (for example the 1178
open bug reports) then private methods.
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=giftlist
Frequent
PHP isn't an OO solution, PHP is a just a tool for a problem. If you think
that solving webscripting problems with OO 'solutions' is the 'only' way
to do it then you should use Java as a tool. And you can use a procedural
aproach for webscripting too, or an
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> At 10:18 3-6-2002, Markus Fischer shared with all of us:
>
> >This is true, but ... there is absolutely _nothing_ we can do
> > about it. The QA Team is, well .. sometimes I get the
> > impression it's only
ainly usefull... but that doesn't warrant bundling it and
enforcing it for users who don't want or need it.
Derick
-------
Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=giftlist
Frequent ranting: http://www
On 3 Jun 2002, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
[...]
> Such sysadmins have already learnt the usage of --without-xxx options.
Sure they do, but it's still annoying for them to see new things
enabled-by-default in every new release.
anybody coming at this from a C background.
I always thought the C select() function also mangles the sets:
(from 'man select')
On exit, the sets are modified in place to indicate which
descriptors actually changed status.
regards,
Derick
> On Sun, 2 Jun 2002
n't think we should enable more things by default. I
even don't see any reason to enable the mbstring module, as only the
japanese/koreans / other multibyte language really need this. Enabling
things by default tend to annoy sysadmins who want full control of their
install.
Der
between the libxml guys
and PHP.
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=giftlist
Frequent ranting: http://www.jdimedi
On Thu, 30 May 2002, brad lafountain wrote:
> The 2M size has alot of stuff that we wouldn't need. Im sure we can get it
> down to under 500K.
I still think 500kb is too much for something the most ppl already have
install
ends how big it is. If we can strip it down a lot I'd
> be a +1. If it'd add 1 MB to our .tar.gz I would be against.
THe normal source distribution is almost 2 MB...
Derick
-------
Did I help you? http://www.jdimedi
Even people who don't need domxm, or libxml have to download this...
[...]
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=giftlist
Frequent ranting: http://www.jd
ministrators of such systems already
> > live with that they have to rebuild and update packages.
> >
>
> Not really, we just need to bundle libs that may have
> conflicts. GD is one, and libxml2 is another.
> (libxml2 changes too frequently and PHP requi
60%:
File: php-4.2.1.tar.gz 3298 KB 05/13/2002 09:02:00 PM
File: libxml2-2.4.17.tar.gz 1861 KB 03/08/2002 12:00:00 AM
And I don't think it would be a good idea to bundle it even if it was
small. A project like libxml changes so much with releases every two weeks
that i
inux but
> want to do it anyway would definately benefit from this.
I don't think: ./configure && make && make install && ldconfig is that
hard to grasp for anybody...
[...]
Derick
-------
Did
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> This solaris issue was most probably introduced with Mac OS X changes made
> to configure.in. However, I don't have a solaris box where I could check
> this theory.
You can use the account on my box if you want...
Derick
> -
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> I don't use sendmail, but we may better to consider removing
> "-i" option from default sendmail_path.
Why would we want this? Mail() works fine, both with sendmail or qmail.
Derick
> * Anselm Nehls <[EMAI
o go in
> the SRM direction but will want a plug-and-play solution for the most
> common PHP 2-tier Apache <-> DB solution.
msession is more more specialized for 'sessions' and thus far better for
it than SRM, which is a different thing.
Derick
--
gs need to be brought up on an archived mailing list and discussed
> there first.
This was discussed before... see the archives (imajes posted the links).
Derick
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
f people have to take extra steps to use or even know
>about it, they will not
> use it.
Well, if they don't look hard for something like this, they won't need it.
Your statement works two ways.
Derick
---
p application server i
> have plans have the frame work be able to handle a cluster of soap application
> servers.
Then why not help us integrate a SOAP communication layer in SRM?
Saves the work of building that app server, plus we already are working
on this and also designing a framewo
>
>
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
---
Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=gif
Hello,
this is the wrong list for user questions, you'd want the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailinglist.
Derick
On Wed, 22 May 2002, fabwash wrote:
> Hello,
>
> what is the best example to use to write classes? The documentation is clear about
>functions, but not really about cl
On 22 May 2002, WeiHe wrote:
> no purpose!
Then don't request one :)
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=giftlist
Frequent ranting: http://www.jdimedia.n
ECTED]:/repository co php4
We don't use ssh...
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/repository co php4
should work fine.
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=giftlist
Fr
the code.
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=giftlist
Frequent ranting: http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/
---
On 21 May 2002, Michael Piskol wrote:
> I'm a bit dumb but nevertheless motivated enough to find out what's the secret
>behind PHP-Programming.
You don't need too be dumb for this, just use the anon cvs (see for more
information: http://www.php.net
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Christian Stocker wrote:
[...]
> Anyway, is there ever going to be a 4.2.2 release, or will the next
> release be 4.3 (and i can stop MFHing :) )?
It's still unsure if there will be a 4.2.2, so please continue mergi
t; I am not aware of the .SWC format, and it certainly isn't readily apparent to users
>of the new Flash MX.
I didn't say .swc, but swc :) It's the identifier (first three chars in
the file) for MX files with compression it seems. But as I've no clue what
compression sc
.0dev]#
I can not dig in further right now, because I've no time.
Derick
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Preston L. Bannister wrote:
> Updated run-tests.php to work well on Win32.
>
> The changes *should* work on Unix as well, and I'll do some
> testing once I finish gettin
On 17 May 2002, Den V. Tsopa wrote:
> I want to apply patch to mbstring extention module.
> I need access to php4/ext/mbstring.
You can post your patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED] too, especially when this
is your first patch, this will be appreciated.
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
>
> if it only supported win32
We're having a hard time on compiling this bitch... It is totally
non-win32 compatible it seems...
Derick
---
Did I help
You didn't look very well then :) Anyway, nice to have you on board.
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=giftlist
Frequent ranting
Andrew,
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Andrew Sitnikov wrote:
> Hello derick,
>
> What you thing about this http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=17180 ?
>
> It must be marked as "Open" instead "Analized" ?
No, I think it should be a documentation problem. It just do
ction names in PHP consistent. It's a
choice, and IMO we made the correct choice.
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php
Hello,
can you file a change/feature request for this @ bugs.php.net ?
Derick
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Brent R. Matzelle wrote:
> I could not help but notice that all DOM XML calls use an
> underscore-based convention:
>
> i.e.
> $mynode->append_child($achild);
>
> I a
finitions,
> but it's the RPM from Mdk (maybe it's broken).
I'm quite sure it is, as I tested a lot with this version of libmcrypt.
Your best shot at this is compiling the library from source youurself.
regards,
Derick
---
Hello,
these versions of libmcrypt should work fine, you have some stray headers
on your system I think.
Derick
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Rodolfo Gonzalez wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2002, Richard Archer wrote:
> > Aah, but by the same logic, if Apache 2.0 with PHP4 can provide the
> &g
users if you want. And you might alsao want to merge it into the branch
for inclusion in a possible 4.2.2.
Derick
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: php.bugs
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 5:
al/en/language.variables.predefined.php)
* The PHP 4.1.0 release announcement
(http://www.php.net/release_4_1_0.php)
* Thomas Oertli's article on secure programming in PHP
(http://www.zend.com/zend/art/art-oertli.php)
regards,
Derick
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
ZEND_EXTENSION_API_NO 20020510
> > ZEND_MODULE_API_NO 20020510
>
> On second thought, do we really need this. Can you imagine scenario where
I think it is useful, as the number of shared modules will increase when
PECL comes into play.
[...]
Derick
-
On Sat, 11 May 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
[...]
> IMHO, we need someone who documents language design
Actually, we need someone to finish this:
http://cvs.php.net/cvs.php/php-lang
regards,
Derick
---
Did I help
allowing people to do the following code and you don't get
> posts up here saying this and that dont work properly.
1. You get ambigiuty in the parser, so your function will only work when
called indirectly.
2. echo as language contruct works fine
3. You can easily make a wrapper in
On Fri, 10 May 2002, brad lafountain wrote:
> Cant we do both.. keep the scaner token and introduce the function?
What would you reach by introducing such a mess?
Derick
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 May 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
> >
> > >
of API NOs to php -v output.
Derick
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 09:36:45AM -, Sander Roobol wrote :
> > sander Thu May 9 05:36:45 2002 EDT
> >
> > Modified files:
> > /php4/sapi/cgi cgi_main.c
> > /php4/sapi/cli php_cl
hat
prohibits it for use as function. It's only a problem if we make this a
function because of *big sigh* BC issues, print "" works now, but won't
work if it's a function. (Only print (""); ).
The same is true for echo.
Derick
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 0
Hello,
as far as I know this never worked, the wisest thing to do is to remove it
from the documentation, as I don't see this fixed anytime soon (or not at
all).
Derick
On 10 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ID: 16739
> Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
deamon is started. But there is one big problem with this
approach which makes it not much faster: you need some sort of
synchronisation between the thread that runs the function library and the
rest of your code.
regards,
Derick
----
Is there a way
> that i can detect this at compile time.
Not really, but PHP 4.2.1 will have a newer Zend API NO, so it won't be a
problem in 4.2.1. But you indeed raise a point, we should bumb up the PHP
API number if any of the PHPAPI functions changes in parameters or
mess, it won't work correctly. You should use 2.13 instead.
> PS: I got around the problems, i'm just wondering what this new build is about.
How did you get around those?
Derick
---
Did I help you? htt
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Did the *BSD mkdir fix make it in?
Yes, I waited for that.
Derick
>
> On Mon, 6 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just rolled a tarball for the second release candidate for 4.2.1. Please
> &g
tests at qa.php.net .
Derick
---
Did I help you? http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/link.php?url=giftlist
Frequent ranting: http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick
laces (my
> extension).
>
> Is it a possiblity to get this change in this release.
Nope, as I'm just tagging RC2. And I'd rather see not any changes happen
now.
Derick
-----
Hello,
At the end of last week, DomXML was merged to the branch and there was no
single test response for RC1. So I want to postpone 4.2.1 till next
monday, and release another RC today (with the new DomXML api).
Derick
On 6 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (I wonder how many more of these we will get? I predict a couple of
> hundred...)
Let's make a poll for it? :)
Derick
> [2002-05-06 00:16:03] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I install php4.2.0 on a Redhat 7.0 platform as following,when done
lize any problems with it till
> > now.
>
> Ok, sounds like this one won't be a "major change" either then. You're
> off the hook ;-)
I still think DomXML underwent a lot of changes so that it should be
classified as 'major change'. It should
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 13:16 03/05/2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Fri, 3 May 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >
> > > To make it clear, this *WAS* a joke :)
> >
> >But your quote was already saved and published :)
>
>
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> To make it clear, this *WAS* a joke :)
But your quote was already saved and published :)
Derick
>
> At 04:36 03/05/2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >At 03:58 03/05/2002, Preston L. Bannister wrote:
> >>Heh - there's a questio
> function __to_string($type) {
> # return a string with $this formatted as $type string
> }
> }
> $date = new Date();
> echo xml"$date";
>
> H...??
Please... no operator overloading. This was discussed before, and AFAIK
the consensus was a n
we have
a nice crypto API for PHP 5?
regards,
Derick
On Thu, 2 May 2002, J Smith wrote:
>
> Just thought I'd give an update about the current status of the Crypto++
> extension for PHP I've been working on the past month or two, called simply
> cryptopp.
>
> T
the .ini file could be found?
That just doesn't make sense to me :)
> The only two options I see, in that case are:
>
> - Add the binary path to the 3 existing lookup places
> - Add a configuration option that would determine whether CWD would be
> used, or the binary path
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 13:36 02/05/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Some hosters use this feature to have different settigns for different
> >customers...
>
> Do you know this for a fact, or is this an estimate?
This is a fact, some hoster here in
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Serguei I. Ivantsov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> How can I use the features of PHP from my own web-server (not apache).
> Maybe libphp4 ? - is there examples?
You need to write a sapi module, you can find examples in php4/s
> path lookup)
Some hosters use this feature to have different settigns for different
customers... you might be removing this for them in this case, which
breaks BC...
Derick
> At 23:17 01/05/2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >At 23:11 01/05/2002, Shane Caraveo wrote:
> >>That
dea beyond reformatting inserted
> strings. For example, for easy soap/xmlrpc serialization, being able to
> tag a value as a date or some other soap/xmlrpc-specific type is very
> useful.
It might, but remember that PHP is not a strong typed language; somehow it
feels like this is not just
help in debugging!
Yeah, I know... but it doesn't belong in ext/ because it's a
Zend_extension. PECL would be the place as soon as it stabilized.
Derick
---
Did I help you? Consider a gift:
http://
On Wed, 1 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does this require 4.2.0 or something? I just tried to apply this to
> 4.1.2 and I get:
It does require latest PHP CVS (4.3.0dev) for now, but as soon as 4.2.1 is
out I can make binary modules available. (That will be in a few days).
; So it got me wondering/thinking that it might be nice to have a $_USER
> array available that has this stuff ...
>
> Any chance it already exists, or might be made available?
$_REQUEST is a combination of $_GET, $_POST and $_COOKIE.
Derick
--
;" is the representatation of FALSE. Try var_dump (ini_get("some_var"));
and you will see it is correct. Doing echo FALSE will also show the empty
string, so it's perfectly normal.
regards,
Derick
-
Hello,
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Adam Wright wrote:
> Very interesting! Possibly stupid question - Will it co-exist happily with
> other Zend extensions (ala the Optimiser/Decoder)?
Didn't try yet, but will do soon.
regards,
Derick
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EM
the License at http://www.vl-srm.net/vlpl/
>
> in srm_llist.[ch]
>
> I don't read the license statement, so I cannot tell if there
> will be a problem or not.
Ah ok, it's BSD style, modelled af
like to see them as standard
> function. It seems there may be license problem, though.
Licence problem? I'm using the PHP Licence for now.
regards,
Derick
---
Did I help you? Consider a gift:
http://
) (source:
zend_execute_API.c:274) in /usr/local/www/news.php.net/common.inc on line
80
Which version of PHP is running on this machine? I'll see if I can fix
this error then.
regards,
Derick
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://
the caller function was run
int xdebug_call_line()
- The line in the caller file from which the current function was started
See the website @ http://www.jdimedia.nl/derick/xdebug.php for more
information and the download location.
regar
Hello,
I just packed PHP 4.2.1RC1, please test. The release is scheduled for May
5th, the RC can be found on
http://www.php.net/~derick/php-4.2.1RC1.tar.bz2
regards,
Derick
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello,
just update both php4 and Zend repositories, do a make clean and it should
work again.
Derick
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Magnus Määttä wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I get this error message when i try to compile from CVS..
>
> gcc -DPHP_ATOM_INC -I/mnt/data1/Stuff/CVS/PHP/php4/include
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Jesus M. Castagnetto wrote:
> I am documenting the new object aggregation functions,
> and before I add it to the CVS tree, I would like to
> ask some questions:
I would wait with documenting this until all discussions are done on it.
regards,
Derick
>
> 1
ameter on unix systems.)
>
> any thoughts? (maybe it's better to just use ini_set()?)
I don't think it is a good idea to overload parameters like this. It might
be better to just make a wrapper around ini_set() then (which I also think
is ugly BTW).
On 25 Apr 2002, Zak Greant wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 08:29, Derick Rethans wrote:
> > Hey Zak,
> >
> > I think this is a nice thing for 4.2.1. I can reproduce it. I hope
> > somebody can investigate this before friday (RC1 of 4.2.1 is scheduled
> > then
#xD | #xA)+
[2] Char ::=#x9 | #xA | #xD | [#x20-#xD7FF] | [#xE000-#xFFFD] |
[#x1-#x10]
Meaning that between everytning is allowed but '?>'.
Derick
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, J Smith wrote:
> Are you positive about that? I would have assumed so, too, but it passes
> bot
Hello,
since a recent cvs update apache stops compiling here:
===> src/modules/php4
gcc -c -I../../os/unix -I../../include -DLINUX=22 -I/usr/include/db1
-DNO_DL_NEEDED `../../apaci` -DLINUX=22 -I/usr/include/db1 -I
-I/dat/dev/php/php-4.3.0dev -I/dat/dev/php/php-4.3.0dev/sapi
-I/dat/dev/php
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Brinkman, Theodore wrote:
> Well, having read that thread (thank you), I tallied up the votes (where I
> could tell what the vote was) and it was 13 for, 3 against, 2
> undecided/don't care. Of the unsure, one person voted against, then
> undecided, then for, the other voted
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Daniel Swarbrick wrote:
> Ooops, sorry folks, jumped the gun on that one. Nope, still using TCP.
autoconf 2.13 is the way to go....
Derick
>
> "Daniel Swarbrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
701 - 800 of 2766 matches
Mail list logo
