Hi,
> > Seriously, we could use a couple beta testers. I've been told I
> > can accept 5 beta-testers. Benefits are that you can distribute
> > your first project for free... Interested?
>
> *IF* I do not have to sign a non-compete, then count me in. If you
> end up going the commercial rout
> Pricing is not definitive yet, but could be somewhere in the range
> $250-500, depending how many people are going to use it. Could you
> tell me if such a price would make you think twice about using it?
I think it depends totally on the target audience.
Small, amateur developers like me wo
Hi!
> That's excellent. Glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks this
> is a cool idea. How long have you been in development of this? When
> did you start?
It's been a project originally to do the same thing as described, but
without using php but rather a custom program that used IE a
This is not what the GPL is for at all. The GPL only protects PHP
itself, and even that does not preclude you from charging for PHP...it
simply requires that you make the source available at no additional
cost.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Brian Tanner wrote the following to Marc Boeren :
> I'm not sur
Hi!
> I'm not sure you would be able to distribute a commercial
> application that is built around PHP commercially, could you?
> Isn't that what the GPL protects against?
Well, PHP is just distributed as a cgi-application, with any modules
compiled however you want. There are no modificatio
;Gre7g Luterman'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Totally Blue Sky
> I am pleased to announce that I dove into this new idea last night
> and made my first proof-of-concept program (PoC-1) for this new
> programming environment (which I am calling LocalPHP for the l
> I am pleased to announce that I dove into this new idea last night
> and made my first proof-of-concept program (PoC-1) for this new
> programming environment (which I am calling LocalPHP for the lack of
> a better name, any suggestions?).
I have a version of exactly what you wish to do rig
I am pleased to announce that I dove into this new idea last night
and made my first proof-of-concept program (PoC-1) for this new
programming environment (which I am calling LocalPHP for the lack of
a better name, any suggestions?).
The proof-of-concept is very crude! It simply brings up a d
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> Brian Tanner wrote:
> > GTK is actually a GUI and is not based on HTML at all... I think what Greg
> > is looking for is an HTML based application that runs standalone...
>
> doesn't GTK have a HTML component that could be embeded to mimic
> a bro
Brian Tanner wrote:
> GTK is actually a GUI and is not based on HTML at all... I think what Greg
> is looking for is an HTML based application that runs standalone...
doesn't GTK have a HTML component that could be embeded to mimic
a browser frontend ?
--
Hartmut Holzgraefe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTK is actually a GUI and is not based on HTML at all... I think what Greg
is looking for is an HTML based application that runs standalone...
-Brian
Have you looked at http://gtk.php.net/? Maybe that's what you need.
Edin
- Original Message -
From: "Gre7g Luterman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Check out http://gtk.php.net/.
Oooohh. Thanks to both of you who posted GTK related links.
This looks like really good stuff and I will explore it more, but if
I understand correctly GTK (via C++ or PHP) essentially still does
what Visual C++ does, it just creates code that can run
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Gre7g Luterman wrote:
> Questions:
>
> [1] Does such a beast exist?
> [2] Can anyone think of a fundamental reason why we couldn't do such
> a thing?
> [3] Is the general consensus that this would be a handy thing to
> have, or is it just me?
Check out http://gtk.php.net/.
Have you looked at http://gtk.php.net/? Maybe that's what you need.
Edin
- Original Message -
From: "Gre7g Luterman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:43 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Totally Blue Sky
> Situation:
>
> PHP is the greatest damned languag
> Sounds like a great idea.
Thanks!
> You could probably improve it by not using an actual browser, but
> by using the browser properties in a standalone application. Here
> me out... I am confident there are some Windows widgets that let
> you easily build you own browser.. which is actually
Sounds like a great idea. You could probably improve it by not using an
actual browser, but by using the browser properties in a standalone
application. Here me out... I am confident there are some Windows widgets
that let you easily build you own browser.. which is actually Internet
Explorer wi
""Gre7g Luterman"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Situation:
>
> I'd love to be able to create a PHP Windows .exe that installed just
> like a regular application. This ideal program would run just like
> an application too. You'd launch it and it would open
17 matches
Mail list logo
