On 13 June 2013 18:38, David Harkness wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
>
>> I'm building a class which needs to have certain methods called by the
>> subclass, but the subclass can extend but not obscure/override the
>> behaviour.
>>
>
> This is t
Hi Richard,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
> I'm building a class which needs to have certain methods called by the
> subclass, but the subclass can extend but not obscure/override the
> behaviour.
>
This is the Template Method pattern, though in this case you could us
Kevin Peterson wrote:
>I have a web application written in PHP. It have been running for
>several years. Now I want to run it as a stand-alone application on an
>Android smartphone or tablet. How can I do it?
There are simple web servers you can run on Android, and also standalone PHP
parsers
LEOPARD Corporation wrote:
Dev-PHP is an IDE, and I don't need such tool because I'm using Eclipse,
and I'm very comfortable with.
Good to hear others are using Eclipse as well ;) I work on a lot more than just
PHP so as a single platform it's great - even between Linux and Windows.
what I re
i'm using dreamweaver its just good for designing + debugging ,, you
dont have to type all the code ,, it would generate the script by
itself so you can learn from the generated script ,, but takes time to
make it handy ,,
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: h
-Original Message-
From: LEOPARD Corporation [mailto:leopardonline@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 12:02 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] What is The best way/tool for debuging PHP?
Thanks for your reply.
Dev-PHP is an IDE, and I don't need such
There is nothing you can call best. But whether some tools, technology will
perform better depends completely on the context.
I know some ways to debug PHP codes.
1. Netbeans IDE. The debugging facility here is excellent. You can debug
even a single file without creating a project. It uses xdebu
Thanks for your reply.
Dev-PHP is an IDE, and I don't need such tool because I'm using Eclipse,
and I'm very comfortable with.
what I really want to know is:
what is the best "pure" debugging tool which its function is to debug PHP
scripts and applications only.
Thanks in advance!
On Sat, May
On 25 Apr 2012, at 09:45, ma...@behnke.biz wrote:
> "Karl-Arne Gjersøyen" hat am 25. April 2012 um 06:45
> geschrieben:
>
>> Hello again.
>> I can't figure out what is wrong here.
>>
>> move_uploaded_file() get error message from die() and can't copy/move
>> temp_file into directory bilder
>>
"Karl-Arne Gjersøyen" hat am 25. April 2012 um 06:45
geschrieben:
> Hello again.
> I can't figure out what is wrong here.
>
> move_uploaded_file() get error message from die() and can't copy/move
> temp_file into directory bilder
>
> I have try to chmod 0777 bilder/ but it did not help.
> Also
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 23:04, Marc Guay wrote:
> How about "long" dayname?
>
That makes sense. I now have two ways to remember. Thanks!
> I find it interesting that the character for "Day of the month without
> leading zeros" is j, which makes sense to me as a half-Francophone who
> sometimes
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 22:51, Matijn Woudt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been wondering where the letter was chosen from too, so I took
> svn and got all the way back to revision 214 where the options was
> first added. Note that this commit is June 7, 1996, and we're talking
> about php2 (php/fi) here.
How about "long" dayname?
I find it interesting that the character for "Day of the month without
leading zeros" is j, which makes sense to me as a half-Francophone who
sometimes calls days "jours". Not that it helps me remember it, I
have to refer to that page pretty much every time I use date().
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> From the fine manual [1]:
> l (lowercase 'L')
> A full textual representation of the day of the week
>
> I can never remember this one, and I use it occasionally. What is the
> mnemonic for "l"? How did this letter come to be chosen? Can anyone
On 29 Oct 2011 at 20:46, Ernie Kemp wrote:
> 2 - Make a new content area in Site Manager->Content Manager. It doesn't
> matter what you put in your content area, you could just put "This is my new
> content area" or "Hello World" if you so choose.
>
> 3 - Grab the information_id of the new conte
On 10/27/11 11:43, "Paul Halliday" wrote:
>if ($argc == 1 || $argc > 2 || !preg_match("(\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2})",
>
>Usage: ./process_patches.php
>
>patches@innm2 ~/Code/Oculi $ ./process_patches.php 2011-01-011
The problem is that your expression basically defines a 'contains'-type
search, so
-Original Message-
From: Paul Halliday [mailto:paul.halli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 2:43 PM
To: PHP-General
Subject: [PHP] What is wrong with this preg_match?
I have the following:
if (isset($argc)) {
if ($argc == 1 || $argc > 2 || !preg_match("(\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 16:57, Tim Streater wrote:
> Looking over the definition of a function today I see:
>
> Function names follow the same rules as other labels in PHP.
>
> but I can't find the definition of a label anywhere. I can't see it listed in
> the contents - have I overlooked it?
On 14 July 2011 13:37, Steve Staples wrote:
>> A valid variable name starts with a letter or underscore
>
> If I am not mistaken, $_1 is not a valid variable name.
[2011-07-14 13:19:18] [Z:\] [\\richardquadling\scratch$ ] >php -r "$_1
= 'one'; echo $_1;"
one
It starts with an undercore and is, t
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 13:39 +0100, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Steve Staples wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 23:27 +0100, Tim Streater wrote:
> > > A valid variable name starts with a letter or underscore
> >
> > If I am not mistaken, $_1 is not a valid variable nam
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Steve Staples wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 23:27 +0100, Tim Streater wrote:
> > A valid variable name starts with a letter or underscore
>
> If I am not mistaken, $_1 is not a valid variable name.
You are mistaken. Try it.
-Stuart
--
Stuart Dallas
3ft9 Ltd
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 23:27 +0100, Tim Streater wrote:
> On 13 Jul 2011 at 22:39, Micky Hulse wrote:
>
> > They must mean labels as in "general naming convention rules for
> > programming"... Like not naming a variable/function "label" with a number at
> > the front.
> >
> > Here's a page about
On 13 Jul 2011 at 22:39, Micky Hulse wrote:
> They must mean labels as in "general naming convention rules for
> programming"... Like not naming a variable/function "label" with a number at
> the front.
>
> Here's a page about variables:
>
> http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.variables.basics
They must mean labels as in "general naming convention rules for
programming"... Like not naming a variable/function "label" with a number at
the front.
Here's a page about variables:
http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.variables.basics.php
Variable names follow the same rules as other labels
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Thijs Lensselink wrote:
> Gary . wrote:
>> On 4/28/10, Thijs Lensselink wrote:
>>> Gary . wrote:
class Pg_Error
{
private static $errors =
array(INTEGRITY_CONST_UNIQUE => 'uniqueness constraint
violated');
>>>
>>> Shouldn
Gary . wrote:
On 4/28/10, Thijs Lensselink wrote:
Gary . wrote:
class Pg_Error
{
private static $errors =
array(INTEGRITY_CONST_UNIQUE => 'uniqueness constraint violated');
Shouldn't this be:
array(self::INTEGRITY_CONST_UNIQUE => 'uniqueness constraint violated');
On 4/28/10, Thijs Lensselink wrote:
> Gary . wrote:
>> class Pg_Error
>> {
>> private static $errors =
>> array(INTEGRITY_CONST_UNIQUE => 'uniqueness constraint violated');
>>
> Shouldn't this be:
>
> array(self::INTEGRITY_CONST_UNIQUE => 'uniqueness constraint violated');
Yes, or some
Gary . wrote:
class Pg_Error
{
private static $errors =
array(INTEGRITY_CONST_UNIQUE => 'uniqueness constraint violated');
Shouldn't this be:
array(self::INTEGRITY_CONST_UNIQUE => 'uniqueness constraint violated');
...
public static function getMessage($ec)
{
$
On 28 April 2010 10:57, Gary . wrote:
> On 4/28/10, Jochem Maas wrote:
>>> >> class Pg_Error
>>> >> {
>>> const INTEGRITY_CONST_UNIQUE = '23505';
>>
>> this is a class constant
>>
>>> >> private static $errors =
>>> >> array(INTEGRITY_CONST_UNIQUE => 'uniqueness
On 4/28/10, Jochem Maas wrote:
>> >> class Pg_Error
>> >> {
>>const INTEGRITY_CONST_UNIQUE = '23505';
>
> this is a class constant
>
>> >> private static $errors =
>> >> array(INTEGRITY_CONST_UNIQUE => 'uniqueness constraint
>> violated');
[...]
> unfortunate
On 4/28/10, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Op 4/28/10 7:39 AM, Gary . schreef:
>> class Pg_Error
>> {
const INTEGRITY_CONST_UNIQUE = '23505';
>> private static $errors =
>> array(INTEGRITY_CONST_UNIQUE => 'uniqueness constraint violated');
>> ...
>> public static function getMessage($ec)
Per Jessen wrote:
> Gary . wrote:
>> Calling it, the array_key_exists call always returns false
...
>> and I can't see what I've done wrong :(
>
> Might this be better:
>
> public static function getMessage($ec)
> {
> $text = '';
> if (array_key_exists($ec, $errors))
>
On 28 April 2010 08:39, Gary . wrote:
> class Pg_Error
> {
> private static $errors =
> array(INTEGRITY_CONST_UNIQUE => 'uniqueness constraint violated');
> ...
> public static function getMessage($ec)
> {
> $text = '';
> if (array_key_exists($ec, Pg_Error::$errors))
Gary . wrote:
> class Pg_Error
> {
> private static $errors =
> array(INTEGRITY_CONST_UNIQUE => 'uniqueness constraint
> violated');
> ...
> public static function getMessage($ec)
> {
> $text = '';
> if (array_key_exists($ec, Pg_Error::$errors))
>
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:34, Daniel Egeberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 02:22, Varuna Seneviratna wrote:
>> Since there are two stable versions 5.3 and 5.2 .What is the difference
>> between these two streams and What is the need for maintaining two streams?
>
> The PHP 5.3.x branch is still
Varuna Seneviratna wrote:
Since there are two stable versions 5.3 and 5.2 .What is the difference
between these two streams and What is the need for maintaining two streams?
PHP5.3 introduced a number of 'improvements' that require many third party
packages to be re-worked. Something which has
5.3.1 is what we call 'current release'. for those who do not like to
sit on the edge, the latest is 5.2.12.
both get bug fixes (checkout the home page release announcements), so
they are 'still supported'. that means those versions earlier to
5.2.11 do not get bug fixes hence 'not supported but s
2009/10/27 David Otton :
> If you go with the first approach, you're writing code that you and
> anyone who comes after you can write useful tests for. The others, and
> you're denying maintenance programmers a useful tool.
I should have lead with this: the wikipedia article on Dependency injecti
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 04:11:32PM +, David Otton wrote:
> 2009/10/27 Paul M Foster :
>
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 05:27:07PM +1100, Eric Bauman wrote:
>
> >> I'm in the process of implementing an ultra-light MVC framework in PHP.
> >> It seems to be a common opinion that the loading of dat
2009/10/27 Paul M Foster :
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 05:27:07PM +1100, Eric Bauman wrote:
>> I'm in the process of implementing an ultra-light MVC framework in PHP.
>> It seems to be a common opinion that the loading of data from a
>> database, file etc. should be independent of the Model, and I
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 05:27:07PM +1100, Eric Bauman wrote:
> I'm in the process of implementing an ultra-light MVC framework in PHP.
> It seems to be a common opinion that the loading of data from a
> database, file etc. should be independent of the Model, and I agree.
> What I'm unsure of is t
l layer.
David
> -Original Message-
> From: Mert Oztekin [mailto:mozte...@anadolusigorta.com.tr]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 6:14 AM
> To: 'Eric Bauman'; php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP] What is the best practice for adding persistence to an MVC
>
Hi Eric,
IMO, controllers shouldnt be responsible for interacting models and
datastoreres. Controllers might only change the datastore class of a model.
You may use your models in lots of controller functions. Defining datastore in
all controllers seems not a good practice. (too much unneccessa
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Paul Halliday wrote:
> For those of you that remember (not likely but anyway) I am working on
> some code that splits CLF records and feeds them into a database.
>
> What I need to do now is automate it.
>
> So what I have is a program (urlsnarf) that redirects its
and throw your favorite Linux distro on it
(I'm not touching that holy war with a 10' eth0 cord)
I'll touch it.
It shouldn't be Fedora - Fedora has too short of a lifetime before major
version update is necessary to get patches. The main advantages of
Fedora are how new and shiny the deskt
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolf [mailto:lonew...@nc.rr.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 8:10 AM
>
> If you are running MySQL, go get a 486, put Fedora on it and
> use it for the heavy queries.
You didn't seriously just tell someone to use an ancient-ass __80486__ PC
for their "hea
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:15, Miller,
Terion wrote:
>
> It seems like Pagination except I already have that in place for all records,
> so maybe I'm just looking for a way to page the search results...
> Boss kept referring to "partitioning results"
By definition, yes, but if you use the term
On 7/6/09 10:07 AM, "Daniel Brown" wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:48, Miller,
Terion wrote:
> Ok, say you have a database with 16000 records in it, but you only want to
> call out say 2000 records at a time as the search/query is performed, then
> store the first 2000 in a session and then r
"Miller wrote:
> Ok, say you have a database with 16000 records in it, but you only want to
> call out say 2000 records at a time as the search/query is performed, then
> store the first 2000 in a session and then retrieve the next 2000 etc etc as
> a way to minimize server strain?
>
> (I'm
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:48, Miller,
Terion wrote:
> Ok, say you have a database with 16000 records in it, but you only want to
> call out say 2000 records at a time as the search/query is performed, then
> store the first 2000 in a session and then retrieve the next 2000 etc etc as
> a way to min
2009/7/6 Miller, Terion :
> Ok, say you have a database with 16000 records in it, but you only want to
> call out say 2000 records at a time as the search/query is performed, then
> store the first 2000 in a session and then retrieve the next 2000 etc etc as
> a way to minimize server strain?
>
> (
Hello,
9el wrote:
> *Note:* It is worth noting that the mail() function is not suitable for
> larger volumes of email in a loop. This function opens and closes an SMTP
> socket for each email, which is not very efficient.
> For the sending of large amounts of email, see the » PEAR::Mail, and »
> P
9el wrote:
But in practice. I mean in real life you'll find the mail() function is
disabled in most servers :)
That's nice, but how many is "larger volumes of email"? 500? 5,000?
25,000?
I note PEAR:Mail has 3 open bugs, PEAR:Mail_Mime has 23 with 3 open
support requests. PHPMailer was mention
But in practice. I mean in real life you'll find the mail() function is
disabled in most servers :)
9el wrote:
*Note:* It is worth noting that the mail() function is not suitable for
larger volumes of email in a loop. This function opens and closes an SMTP
socket for each email, which is not very efficient.
For the sending of large amounts of email, see the » PEAR::Mail, and »
PEAR::Mail_Queue
Wow can't believe I missed that. I also was wondering why Ray mailed an
empty message... :)
-Original Message-
From: doctortomor...@gmail.com [mailto:doctortomor...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of 9el
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 4:05 PM
To: Gary
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re:
That was it, but Im sorry, I did not see that Ray had already pointed that
out, so apologies to Ray and many thanks to everyone...
gary
"9el" wrote in message
news:79d892150904031305j6e1b00d4qed0d9fbf13437...@mail.gmail.com...
>
---
Use FreeOpenSourceSoftwares, Stop piracy, Let the developers live. Get
a Free CD of Ubuntu mailed to your door without any cost. Visit :
www.ubuntu.com
--
On
Peter
I had the
if ( isset( $_POST['submit'] ) ) {
in there and it did not work.
I have used this on several sites, the only difference is that I was tyring
to contain it in one file. I also created a file just to process the POST,
but it still did not work.
I was thinkning it was something
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:08:45 -0400
"Gary" wrote:
> This is driving me nuts. I am getting blank emails and the only
> information that is being passed to MySQL is the IP address.
>
> Can someone tell me what is wrong with this?
>
If this is in one file, as I assume it is, here's what is happeni
This is unrelated, the email sends fine. And it's one per submission.
-Original Message-
From: doctortomor...@gmail.com [mailto:doctortomor...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of 9el
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 3:37 PM
To: Gary
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] What is wrong
*Note:* It is worth noting that the mail() function is not suitable for
larger volumes of email in a loop. This function opens and closes an SMTP
socket for each email, which is not very efficient.
For the sending of large amounts of email, see the » PEAR::Mail, and »
PEAR::Mail_Queue packages.
*
N
ng like print_r on $_POST to see if it contains *anything*,
>> seems like it's empty?!
>>
>> Also, when you say blank emails I assume you mean they have the template
>> you made but the variables are empty and not zero-length emails.
>>
>> -Original Mes
On Friday 03 April 2009 13:08:45 Gary wrote:
> This is driving me nuts. I am getting blank emails and the only
> information that is being passed to MySQL is the IP address.
>
> Can someone tell me what is wrong with this?
>
>
>
>If you can see this, it's an anti-spam measure. Please don't
e it's empty?!
Also, when you say blank emails I assume you mean they have the template
you made but the variables are empty and not zero-length emails.
-Original Message-
From: Gary [mailto:gwp...@ptd.net]
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 3:14 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re:
p...@ptd.net]
> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 3:14 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] What is wrong with this code
>
> Its there...
>
>
> "Igor Escobar" wrote in message
> news:1f5251d50904031212o6fcc3e43q5c60b7ae373e9...@mail.gmail.co
emails I assume you mean they have the template
you made but the variables are empty and not zero-length emails.
-Original Message-
From: Gary [mailto:gwp...@ptd.net]
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 3:14 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] What is wrong with this code
Its
d.net]
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 3:14 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] What is wrong with this code
Its there...
"Igor Escobar" wrote in message
news:1f5251d50904031212o6fcc3e43q5c60b7ae373e9...@mail.gmail.com...
> You forgot to mention the &q
Its there...
"Igor Escobar" wrote in message
news:1f5251d50904031212o6fcc3e43q5c60b7ae373e9...@mail.gmail.com...
> You forgot to mention the "method" of the form.
>
> ...
>
> Regards,
> Igor Escoar
> Systems Analyst & Interface Designer
>
> --
>
> Personal Blog
> ~ blog.igorescobar.com
> Onli
You forgot to mention the "method" of the form.
...
Regards,
Igor Escoar
Systems Analyst & Interface Designer
--
Personal Blog
~ blog.igorescobar.com
Online Portifolio
~ www.igorescobar.com
Twitter
~ @igorescobar
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Gary wrote:
> This is driving me nuts. I
16 April 2008 17:23
> > > To: Jay Blanchard
> > > Cc: Tony Marston; php-general@lists.php.net
> > > Subject: Re: [PHP] What is the practical use of "abstract"
> > > and "interface"?
> > >
> > >
> > > On 16/0
On 16/04/2008, Tony Marston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Robin Vickery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 16 April 2008 17:23
> > To: Jay Blanchard
> > Cc: Tony Marston; php-general@lists.php.net
> >
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Daevid Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> All that extra code for absolutely no benefit! It is
> > possible to define an
> > >> interface (as in API) without actually using the term
> > "interface", so IMHO
> > >> the term "interface" is totally redundant an
> >> All that extra code for absolutely no benefit! It is
> possible to define an
> >> interface (as in API) without actually using the term
> "interface", so IMHO
> >> the term "interface" is totally redundant and a waste of time.
> >
> > While I agree that Interfaces are mostly a lot of extra
seems nobody has a proper example of how
a defined abstract class and/or interface can actually
be usefu beyond documentation or compile time checks.
well consider this (no code, it would take too much I think):
1. a CMS that manages a dynamic, user-created tree of nodes, each
node containing 's
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Jeremy Privett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This is a holy war that is never going to end. It boils down to personal
and professional preferences. The fact of the matter is, if a company uses
these concepts and you don't know, understand,
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Jeremy Privett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This is a holy war that is never going to end. It boils down to personal
> and professional preferences. The fact of the matter is, if a company uses
> these concepts and you don't know, understand, or execute that know
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Tony Marston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
"Robert Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
While I agree that Interfaces are mostly a lot of extra code, I have to
also say that they are there primarily to enforce a contract betwe
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 12:43 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Tony Marston <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > "Robert Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > >
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 17:22 +0100, Robin Vickery wrote:
> > On 16/04/2008, Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > > What about encapsulation?
> > >
> > > Interfaces have nothing to do with encap
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 12:43 -0600, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Tony Marston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > "Robert Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > While I agree that Interfaces are mostly a lot of extra code, I have to
> > > also say that th
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Tony Marston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> "Robert Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > While I agree that Interfaces are mostly a lot of extra code, I have to
> > also say that they are there primarily to enforce a contract between the
> > user of t
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 17:22 +0100, Robin Vickery wrote:
> On 16/04/2008, Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > What about encapsulation?
> >
> > Interfaces have nothing to do with encapsulation for the smple reason
> > that I
> > can have encapsulation without using interfa
On 16/04/2008, Jay Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> > What about encapsulation?
>
> Interfaces have nothing to do with encapsulation for the smple reason
> that I
> can have encapsulation without using interfaces.
Unique use of logic there.
By similar reasoning; swimming trunks
[snip]
> What about encapsulation?
Interfaces have nothing to do with encapsulation for the smple reason
that I
can have encapsulation without using interfaces.
> Also, there is an advantage to
> interfaces that has not been mentioned yet, the fact that a
> class can implement multiple interfac
[snip]
"enforcing a contract" is a lot of maningless gobbledegook. The simple
fact
is that it is possible to have an interface without ever using the term
"interface". Nothing extra is added by using the term "interface"
(except
for effort) so there is absolutely no advantage in doing so. That i
"Robert Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 12:20 +0100, Tony Marston wrote:
>> The term "abstract" has been adequately defined in this thread, so I
>> won't
>> repeat it.
>>
>> However, there is one important aspect of the term "interf
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 12:20 +0100, Tony Marston wrote:
> The term "abstract" has been adequately defined in this thread, so I won't
> repeat it.
>
> However, there is one important aspect of the term "interface" which I think
> that most people seem to miss - it is not necessary to use the term
>
The term "abstract" has been adequately defined in this thread, so I won't
repeat it.
However, there is one important aspect of the term "interface" which I think
that most people seem to miss - it is not necessary to use the term
"interface" in order to have an interface. Let me explain with a co
On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Larry Garfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > If your code doesn't have an API and clear separation of
> > parts, then neither
> > abstract classes nor interfaces are useful to you.
> >
> > If you're codin
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Garfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> If your code doesn't have an API and clear separation of
> parts, then neither
> abstract classes nor interfaces are useful to you.
>
> If you're coding anything of respectable size, vis, more than
> a one-off
ALarry Garfield wrote:
On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Daevid Vincent wrote:
I've had at least three job interviews in the past two weeks, and each one
has asked me this rather "text book academic" question regarding the
difference between "abstract" vs. "interface". I've been coding for nearly
20 yea
On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> I've had at least three job interviews in the past two weeks, and each one
> has asked me this rather "text book academic" question regarding the
> difference between "abstract" vs. "interface". I've been coding for nearly
> 20 years, and at least 1
Just adding one line to the topic...
Interfaces are like C or C++ headers files. Them are used to another
class(program in C) to call methods without care the implementation. In
other hand abstract classes are (as the name says) an abstract way to use
multiple specializations of the same group of c
[snip]
...stuff...
[/snip]
The practical use of an abstract class is in its ability to define
criteria for classes that inherit from it. How practical would it be to
define a 'truck' class with 4 wheels and then define a 'car' class with
4 wheels when we could define an abstract class that defines
Daevid Vincent wrote:
> I've had at least three job interviews in the past two weeks, and each one
> has asked me this rather "text book academic" question regarding the
> difference between "abstract" vs. "interface". I've been coding for nearly 20
> years, and at least 10 of those have been in
Hi,
If possible, write your inserts queries in a text file and use LOAD DATA for
bulk inserts.
--
Keep Smiling
Shafiq Rehman (ZCE)
http://www.phpgurru.com | http://shafiq.pk
Cell: +92 300 423 9385
On 11/2/07, Andrew Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 2, 2007 10:41 AM, afan pasalic <[
On Nov 2, 2007 10:41 AM, afan pasalic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...is there any suggestion for the process of inserting up to 5K records at
> the time ...
Is it possible to save your data to a text file and then use one of
MySQL's built-in import queries? (I know in some situations it isn't
an
Stut wrote:
> Jim Lucas wrote:
>> afan pasalic wrote:
>>> hi,
>>> it's maybe more question for mysql list, but since php is involved
>>> too... :-)
>>> I have php script that inserts into mysql table couple hundreds of
>>> records.
>>> usually, it looks like:
>>> >> // 1st record
>>> $query = "INSE
afan pasalic wrote:
Stut wrote:
afan pasalic wrote:
Stut wrote:
Jim Lucas wrote:
afan pasalic wrote:
hi,
it's maybe more question for mysql list, but since php is involved
too... :-)
I have php script that inserts into mysql table couple hundreds of
records.
usually, it looks like:
I would
1 - 100 of 422 matches
Mail list logo
