On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 09:18:18PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
On Saturday 20 July 2013 22:31:31 Adrien Grellier wrote:
This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer
URL:http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer.
I have read the Social Contract, Debian
to upload to that repo, you can upload yourself
directly to kdetrunk (work repo) and then pull it to the another repo.
The best here is you join us in IRC and we guide you, we do not have any
write up instructions about this.
Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:06:35AM +0800, Paul Wise
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 03:51:12PM +0200, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
judging from Ana's reply to my initial e-mail she is going to continue to do
this kind of blog posts. Thus I won't proceed with my idea and focus on
passing
bits and pieces for inclusion in such posts on to her.
No, no. I
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:49:52PM +0200, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
Dear fellow Qt/KDE team members,
inspired by what Cyril Brulebois' DXN posts about news in the X world, I was
wondering whether we wouldn't want the same for Qt/KDE? I'd volunteer to write
these news, but would rely on you to
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 03:00:50PM -0400, Ana Guerrero wrote:
This needs some general planning of what needs to be done and tell the
release team about our plans. I am willing to help with this part
and make uploads if needed, but I do not have too much time for the
updating part.
Thanks
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 03:53:33PM +0300, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Hello,
so hereby I propose to switch our KDE packaging from svn to git on
git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-kde/kde/$modulename.git. In other words, each
official KDE module gets its own $module.git under
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:35:11PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Hello,
since Debian ftpmasters have made it possible to upload source packages
packaged in the next generation formats:
1) I don't see any blockers to use pristine KDE upstream tarballs anymore
(renamed to appropriate
Package: desktop-base
Version: 5.0.5
Severity: normal
Please update the Suggests on kde to kde-standard. kde metapackage not longer
exists.
Ana
--
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
- Forwarded message from Knut Yrvin knut.yr...@nokia.com -
From: Knut Yrvin knut.yr...@nokia.com
Organization: Qt Software
Reply-To: Knut Yrvin knut.yr...@nokia.com
To: Debian Qt/KDE debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:06:29 +0200
Subject: Q: Key issues to address
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 08:57:19PM +0300, George Kiagiadakis wrote:
Hi,
I just branched off kde 4.2 in /branches/kde4.2 and commited kde4libs,
kdepimlibs, kdebase-runtime and kdebase-workspace 4.2.90+svnXX in
trunk. I'm just writing this mail to let you know that trunk is now
4.3.
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 10:59:52PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 08:57:19PM +0300, George Kiagiadakis wrote:
Hi,
I just branched off kde 4.2 in /branches/kde4.2 and commited kde4libs,
kdepimlibs, kdebase-runtime and kdebase-workspace 4.2.90+svnXX in
trunk. I'm
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:19:17PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
How big would the resulting install be?
I'm asking because it is *essential* that the packages listed as Key
don't install too large a system as they (plus all their Depends, not
Recommends) must easily fit on a single CD (together
tags 528489 +patch
thanks
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:04:38AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.78
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-kde-talk@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hello,
while trying to get an initial view of migrating KDE4 to testing with
britney, I noticed
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 06:42:31PM +0200, Martin Alfke wrote:
Hi Martin and all,
I do not have any problem at all with you offering KDE packages. You
are totally free to do so, and I am sure your work is highly appreciated
for a
lot of users. But I have problems with the whole
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 06:49:33AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
We should kill meta-kde and update meta-kde4 to some final layout.
...
After leaving this issue sleep a couple of weeks, I am all for:
kde-full (current kde4)
kde-minimal
kde-thirdparty
And we can keep using kde-$MEANING
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 02:45:04PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
Ana Guerrero wrote:
With KDE 3 as default kde in unstable, the kde 3 support provided in
^ 4? ;)
openoffice.org (-kde and -kab AFAIR) is not longer useful. Please stop
building it.
Last I loooked
Hola,
kde 4.2's translations are currently stuck at new only because they
include a new translation (slovak), could you take a look at it please?
Ana
--
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 06:49:33AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
Welcome to the annual metapackages discussion.
After the emails that followed my first mail, I have realized that certainly
if the 4 in the meta packages is going to be killed, the sooner, the better.
So, what about:
- kde
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 04:47:21PM +, Grześ Andruszkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
I don't want to hasten you in anyway, but do you have a rough idea
when kde4 will be available in unstable?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2009/03/msg00072.html
--
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:13:16PM +0100, Armin Berres wrote:
On Tue, 03 Feb 09 22:53, Armin Berres wrote:
The current situation is, that KDE 3 applications use ~/.kde and KDE 4
applications use ~/.kde4. The problem with this approach is, that no
data/settings are automatically converted
Hi,
For updating the release notes for Lenny [0], what about:
There are not huge changes in the KDE Desktop Enviroment from the version
shipped in Etch. Lenny ships an updated translation and service release of KDE
3.5 that is a mixture between 3.5.9 and 3.5.10. Modules labeled as version
Hi Yllar,
We have realized you are logging the URLs at #debian-qt-kde and publishing
then publically available at http://loru.mine.nu.
We use to paste in this channel URLs with private working repos and some
semi-private URLs from time to time. This info is not top-secret (or we
do not
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 05:11:16PM +0200, Stefanos Harhalakis wrote:
On Friday 02 January 2009, Ana Guerrero wrote:
Anyway, without beeing a DD, as a debian user, I'd like to have this
program available as a package.
So, to conclude, just take a moment to reply with at least a simple
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:58:07PM +0200, Stefanos Harhalakis wrote:
I believe that there are some arguments for including it in debian too:
a) It is not integrated. It just integrates with the desktop environment. It
is a single executable binary that interracts with hal and dbus.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:17:49PM +, Beojan Stanislaus wrote:
On Sunday 23 November 2008 21:07:24 Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 09:45:23PM +0100, Matthias wrote:
Hi!
Please tell me if you plan to provide debian packages for kipi-plugins
0.2.0 beta3 and koffice 2.0
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 09:28:59PM -0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
Sorry Ana, this should have gone to the list
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Ana Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 09:45:23PM +0100, Matthias wrote:
Hi!
Please tell me if you plan to provide debian packages for kipi-plugins 0.2.0
beta3 and koffice 2.0 beta3 in experimental.
koffice 2.0 beta3 is very unlikely to be uploaded to experimental, you have
the beta2 and using its
As promised, I will do the backports, taking a look to the commits for 4.1.3,
this took my attention...
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 07:43:10PM +, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
Author: fourmond
Date: 2008-11-04 19:43:09 + (Tue, 04 Nov 2008)
New Revision: 12549
Added:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:25:49PM -0400, Matthew Rosewarne wrote:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008, Ana Guerrero wrote:
Because it does need Gmm++ 3.0 (A generic C++ template library for sparse,
dense and skyline matrices), that is not in the debian archive.
The GETFEM++/GMM++ packaging
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 07:24:59PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
..
I will forward you back to the recent discussion on IRC.
--
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
So, we have in the Qt/Debian team the classic Debian problem of 2 developers
not getting along. It started on IRC some time ago and lately has spilled
on this mailing list. It has been there for some time now, but it grow a lot
with the past KDE3/KDE4 in lenny issue.
It is killing my fun of
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 07:30:24PM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
Hello all,
KDE3 it's upstream 'dead' and KDE4 it's the current KDE.
Is it possible to let each user choose which KDE he/she wants to use?
No, we ship either KDE 3 or KDE 4. KDE 3 is not fully dead, there is security
32 matches
Mail list logo
