Hi guys,
|--==> On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 09:51:29 +0200, Reinhard Tartler
said:
RT> Hi Free,
RT> long time no see, how's it going?
I'm fine hope you too! I'm keeping an eye on the ml, but don't really
have much time to contribute actively.
RT> After browsing the list of open bugs in the pkg-
Hi Felipe,
|--==> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:00:44 -0300, Felipe Sateler
said:
FS> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 13:44, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>I propose we wait one more week in case somebody else wants to add
>>something
FS> OK, a week has passed. I am sending the announcement.
That was a gre
Hey,
|--==> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:01:43 +0200, Andreas Tille
said:
AT> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:59:57PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>nice to see you keep pushing Debian Blends :)
AT> Free, nice to hear from you again! \o/
Same here! :)
>>Yes, the DeMuDi
Hi Andreas!
nice to see you keep pushing Debian Blends :)
|--==> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:01:10 +0200, Andreas Tille said:
AT> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:50:16AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>As seen on the documentation, there is already a DeMuDi blend. Maybe we
>>can start from there? DeM
Hi,
|--==> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:11:27 +0200, Reinhard Tartler
said:
RT> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 09:00:17 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 02:39:16AM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>>
>>>We instantly switch to jackd2. End of the story.
>>
>>Thanks for a clear c
Hi,
|--==> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 15:56:24 +0200, Adrian Knoth
said:
[...]
AK> What I've seen in the team so far: make it work. Besides this, there are
AK> no to few rules.
AK> We don't have a "please beginners" policy.
Totally. The only strong points we have as team are listed here
htt
Hi Reinhard,
|--==> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:23:50 +0200, Reinhard Tartler
said:
RT> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 23:11:58 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote:
AK> If you don't fear the lack of Debian-wide testing, go ahead and upload
AK> 1.9.5 to unstable. The users would probabl
Hi,
|--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:20:57 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard
said:
JS> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:11:58PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
AK> * audio.conf handling. Right now, it cannot be tweaked by the user.
AK> Sure it can, but the package will overwrite it on updates.
Hi Adrian,
|--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:49:51 +0100, Adrian Knoth
said:
AK> I completely agree with you: it has more features, it is stable, and I'm
AK> also using it instead of jackd1.
AK> If you don't fear the lack of Debian-wide testing, go ahead and upload
AK> 1.9.5 to unstable. T
Hi,
|--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:53:15 +0100, Adrian Knoth
said:
AK> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:34:07PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
AK> [jackd2 over jackd1]
>>> jack1) and apparently is what the upstream recommends as well.
>>
>>I see no such thing on their webpage, nor in their mai
Hi,
|--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:08:10 +0100, Reinhard Tartler
said:
RT> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:28:42 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote:
RT> there is currently a vote on this ongoing right now...
>>
>>I'm sorry, I think I missed it, can you point me to it
Hi Reinhard,
|--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:13:12 +0100, Reinhard Tartler
said:
RT> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 23:30:56 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>|--==> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:45 +, Archive Administrator
said:
>>
AA> Rejec
Hi Andrian,
|--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:17:59 +0100, Adrian Knoth
said:
AK> Why 1.9.4+something and not 1.9.5?
Sorry, I meant 1.9.5-1.
AK> I'd like to sort out the config file issue (dpkg vs. ucf), but we could
AK> probably upload d2c23abd119cdf7f40654fa443e2a51cf6265893, that is,
A
Hi,
|--==> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:45 +, Archive Administrator
said:
AA> Reject Reasons:
AA> Source package jack-audio-connection-kit does not have
'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' in its most recent version (1.9.4+svn3842-2)
I can sponsor this upload to experimental. However I'm wondering
Hi,
|--==> On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:08:02 +0100, Adrian Knoth
said:
AK> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 02:00:49PM +, scottalaven...@gmail.com wrote:
>>Hello all,
AK> Hi!
>>I'm working with the Ubuntu Studio developers and I was hoping to
>>coordinate getting Ardour 2.8.6 into Ubuntu as
Hi Alessio,
AT> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Archive Administrator
AT> wrote:
>>Reject Reasons:
>>Source package idjc does not have 'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' in its most
recent version (0.8.1-1)
AT> Err.
AT> The package is ready and needs a sponsor.
AT> Before uploading, pleas
Hi Reinhard,
|--==> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:50:48 +0100, Reinhard Tartler
said:
[...]
RT> It seems that the fusd-kor package is currently in a pretty bad
RT> state. I'm wondering how to proceed with this package. I see the
RT> following options:
RT> a) fix it, move it to pkg-multimedi
Hi,
|--==> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:36:54 +0100, Reinhard Tartler
said:
RT> quadrispro-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org writes:
>>diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
>>index 490d3fa..6ef3958 100644
>>--- a/debian/control
>>+++ b/debian/control
>>@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ Section: sound
Hi,
|--==> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:08:48 +0100, rosea grammostola
said:
rg> Hi,
rg> I was wondering. We will have jack1 and jack2 in future right? When do
rg> you use jack1 and when jack2?
rg> Should we already change the dependencies from jackd to jackd or
rg> jack1 or jack2 or som
Hi Daniel,
|--==> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:59:49 +0100, Daniel James
said:
DJ> Hi Free,
>>If
>>we want to start working on jack2, while letting users stick to jack1
>>till everything is really polished, I suggest uploading jack2 to
>>experimental.
DJ> Sounds like a good plan :-) Can
Hi Adrian,
|--==> On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:54:35 +0100, Adrian Knoth
said:
AK> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 06:45:15PM +0100, Alessandro Frigeri wrote:
>>as reported in the ubuntu package bug report
>>(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ardour/+bug/248269) the
>>libardour_tranzport.so d
Hi Adrian,
|--==> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:49:02 +0100, Adrian Knoth
said:
AK> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 01:33:18PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>Hi Adrian,
AK> Hi!
>>Thanks for having changed this! I'm not too convinced by the idea of not
>>includi
Hi Adrian,
|--==> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:22:31 +0100, Adrian Knoth
said:
AK> On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 06:37:11PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>Hi Adrian,
AK> Hi!
AK> [jackd2]
>>Great job! I've been trying it and looks very stable. Do you think it
Hi,
|--==> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:05:49 +0100 (CET), Jaromír Mikeš
said:
>>Od: Cyril Brulebois
>>
>>Sorry about the first NMU, looks like I only removed libc6-dev from
>>Build-Depends on a porter box, and checked it was OK there; and only
>>wro
Hi Mira,
|--==> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:58:22 +0100 (CET), Jaromír Mikeš
said:
JM> Od: Free Ekanayaka
JM> Just one other concern ... Should be jconv renamed to jconvolver to not be
JM> confusing?
JM> If so how to do it?
FE> Unless there's a very compelling r
|--==> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 06:19:40 +0100, Cyril Brulebois
said:
CB> Sorry about the first NMU, looks like I only removed libc6-dev from
CB> Build-Depends on a porter box, and checked it was OK there; and only
CB> wrote about it on my devel box, where the NMU was prepared. Hopefully
CB> t
Hi Mira,
|--==> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:31:04 +0100 (CET), Jaromír Mikeš
said:
>>Od: Free Ekanayaka
JM> I suggesting upload zita-convolver 2.0.0-2 (with Fons's
JM> suggestions) than I finish Jconvolver 0.8.4 and make some tests
JM> with these flags. In the
Hi Mira,
|--==> On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:55:00 +0100 (CET), Jaromír Mikeš
said:
JM> I suggesting upload zita-convolver 2.0.0-2 (with Fons's
JM> suggestions) than I finish Jconvolver 0.8.4 and make some tests
JM> with these flags. In the case there will be some performance
JM> improvements
28 matches
Mail list logo