Re: Bug#559516: FTBFS on various archs

2009-12-06 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Mira, |--==> On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:55:00 +0100 (CET), Jaromír Mikeš said: JM> I suggesting upload zita-convolver 2.0.0-2 (with Fons's JM> suggestions) than I finish Jconvolver 0.8.4 and make some tests JM> with these flags. In the case there will be some performance JM> improvements

Re: RFS: Jconvolver was:[Bug#559516: FTBFS on various archs]

2009-12-07 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Mira, |--==> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:31:04 +0100 (CET), Jaromír Mikeš said: >>Od: Free Ekanayaka JM> I suggesting upload zita-convolver 2.0.0-2 (with Fons's JM> suggestions) than I finish Jconvolver 0.8.4 and make some tests JM> with these flags. In the

Bug#540427: Real patch for my NMU

2009-12-07 Thread Free Ekanayaka
|--==> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 06:19:40 +0100, Cyril Brulebois said: CB> Sorry about the first NMU, looks like I only removed libc6-dev from CB> Build-Depends on a porter box, and checked it was OK there; and only CB> wrote about it on my devel box, where the NMU was prepared. Hopefully CB> t

Re: RFS: Jconvolver was:[Bug#559516: FTBFS on various archs]

2009-12-07 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Mira, |--==> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:58:22 +0100 (CET), Jaromír Mikeš said: JM> Od: Free Ekanayaka JM> Just one other concern ... Should be jconv renamed to jconvolver to not be JM> confusing? JM> If so how to do it? FE> Unless there's a very compelling r

Re: Bug#540427: Real patch for my NMU

2009-12-07 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi, |--==> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:05:49 +0100 (CET), Jaromír Mikeš said: >>Od: Cyril Brulebois >> >>Sorry about the first NMU, looks like I only removed libc6-dev from >>Build-Depends on a porter box, and checked it was OK there; and only >>wro

Re: RFS: jackd

2009-12-11 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Adrian, |--==> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:22:31 +0100, Adrian Knoth said: AK> On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 06:37:11PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote: >>Hi Adrian, AK> Hi! AK> [jackd2] >>Great job! I've been trying it and looks very stable. Do you think it&#

Re: RFS: jackd

2009-12-11 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Adrian, |--==> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:49:02 +0100, Adrian Knoth said: AK> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 01:33:18PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote: >>Hi Adrian, AK> Hi! >>Thanks for having changed this! I'm not too convinced by the idea of not >>includi

Bug#560840: ardour: Frontier Design Tranzport surface support is missing

2009-12-13 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Adrian, |--==> On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:54:35 +0100, Adrian Knoth said: AK> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 06:45:15PM +0100, Alessandro Frigeri wrote: >>as reported in the ubuntu package bug report >>(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ardour/+bug/248269) the >>libardour_tranzport.so d

Re: JACK2 package naming convention

2009-12-13 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Daniel, |--==> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:59:49 +0100, Daniel James said: DJ> Hi Free, >>If >>we want to start working on jack2, while letting users stick to jack1 >>till everything is really polished, I suggest uploading jack2 to >>experimental. DJ> Sounds like a good plan :-) Can

Re: how do we prepare for jack1 and jack2?

2009-12-16 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi, |--==> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:08:48 +0100, rosea grammostola said: rg> Hi, rg> I was wondering. We will have jack1 and jack2 in future right? When do rg> you use jack1 and when jack2? rg> Should we already change the dependencies from jackd to jackd or rg> jack1 or jack2 or som

Re: [SCM] bristol packaging branch, master, updated. upstream/0.40.7-5-g83bc79b

2009-12-28 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi, |--==> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:36:54 +0100, Reinhard Tartler said: RT> quadrispro-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org writes: >>diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control >>index 490d3fa..6ef3958 100644 >>--- a/debian/control >>+++ b/debian/control >>@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ Section: sound

Re: fosd-kor, Was: Possible problems in your Debian packages

2010-01-15 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Reinhard, |--==> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:50:48 +0100, Reinhard Tartler said: [...] RT> It seems that the fusd-kor package is currently in a pretty bad RT> state. I'm wondering how to proceed with this package. I see the RT> following options: RT> a) fix it, move it to pkg-multimedi

Re: RFS: idjc

2010-01-25 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Alessio, AT> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Archive Administrator AT> wrote: >>Reject Reasons: >>Source package idjc does not have 'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' in its most recent version (0.8.1-1) AT> Err. AT> The package is ready and needs a sponsor. AT> Before uploading, pleas

Re: Coordinating Ardour 2.8.6 in Debian and Ubuntu Studio

2010-02-01 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi, |--==> On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:08:02 +0100, Adrian Knoth said: AK> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 02:00:49PM +, scottalaven...@gmail.com wrote: >>Hello all, AK> Hi! >>I'm working with the Ubuntu Studio developers and I was hoping to >>coordinate getting Ardour 2.8.6 into Ubuntu as

Re: jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2010-03-23 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi, |--==> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:45 +, Archive Administrator said: AA> Reject Reasons: AA> Source package jack-audio-connection-kit does not have 'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' in its most recent version (1.9.4+svn3842-2) I can sponsor this upload to experimental. However I'm wondering

Re: jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2010-03-24 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Andrian, |--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:17:59 +0100, Adrian Knoth said: AK> Why 1.9.4+something and not 1.9.5? Sorry, I meant 1.9.5-1. AK> I'd like to sort out the config file issue (dpkg vs. ucf), but we could AK> probably upload d2c23abd119cdf7f40654fa443e2a51cf6265893, that is, A

Re: jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2010-03-24 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Reinhard, |--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:13:12 +0100, Reinhard Tartler said: RT> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 23:30:56 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote: >>Hi, >> >>|--==> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:45 +, Archive Administrator said: >> AA> Rejec

Re: jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2010-03-24 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi, |--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:08:10 +0100, Reinhard Tartler said: RT> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:28:42 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote: RT> there is currently a vote on this ongoing right now... >> >>I'm sorry, I think I missed it, can you point me to it

Re: jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2010-03-24 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi, |--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:53:15 +0100, Adrian Knoth said: AK> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:34:07PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: AK> [jackd2 over jackd1] >>> jack1) and apparently is what the upstream recommends as well. >> >>I see no such thing on their webpage, nor in their mai

Re: jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2010-03-24 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Adrian, |--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:49:51 +0100, Adrian Knoth said: AK> I completely agree with you: it has more features, it is stable, and I'm AK> also using it instead of jackd1. AK> If you don't fear the lack of Debian-wide testing, go ahead and upload AK> 1.9.5 to unstable. T

Re: jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2010-03-25 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi, |--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:20:57 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard said: JS> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:11:58PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote: AK> * audio.conf handling. Right now, it cannot be tweaked by the user. AK> Sure it can, but the package will overwrite it on updates.

Re: Jack2 for squeeze, was: jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2010-03-29 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Reinhard, |--==> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:23:50 +0200, Reinhard Tartler said: RT> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 23:11:58 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote: AK> If you don't fear the lack of Debian-wide testing, go ahead and upload AK> 1.9.5 to unstable. The users would probabl

Re: jackd2 ready to roll

2010-04-06 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi, |--==> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 15:56:24 +0200, Adrian Knoth said: [...] AK> What I've seen in the team so far: make it work. Besides this, there are AK> no to few rules. AK> We don't have a "please beginners" policy. Totally. The only strong points we have as team are listed here htt

Re: packaging jack - cross-distro coordination

2010-04-24 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi, |--==> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:11:27 +0200, Reinhard Tartler said: RT> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 09:00:17 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 02:39:16AM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote: >> >>>We instantly switch to jackd2. End of the story. >> >>Thanks for a clear c

Re: Debian Multimedia Blend

2010-08-13 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Andreas! nice to see you keep pushing Debian Blends :) |--==> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:01:10 +0200, Andreas Tille said: AT> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:50:16AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>As seen on the documentation, there is already a DeMuDi blend. Maybe we >>can start from there? DeM

Re: Debian Multimedia Blend

2010-08-13 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hey, |--==> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:01:43 +0200, Andreas Tille said: AT> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:59:57PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: >>nice to see you keep pushing Debian Blends :) AT> Free, nice to hear from you again! \o/ Same here! :) >>Yes, the DeMuDi

Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia team

2010-11-13 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Felipe, |--==> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:00:44 -0300, Felipe Sateler said: FS> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 13:44, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>I propose we wait one more week in case somebody else wants to add >>something FS> OK, a week has passed. I am sending the announcement. That was a gre

Re: openmovieeditor in debian

2011-04-21 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi guys, |--==> On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 09:51:29 +0200, Reinhard Tartler said: RT> Hi Free, RT> long time no see, how's it going? I'm fine hope you too! I'm keeping an eye on the ml, but don't really have much time to contribute actively. RT> After browsing the list of open bugs in the pkg-