Re: RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)

2010-12-19 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
Just a ping, to make sure this has not been forgotten. Any comments on the package? If not, would someone please upload it? The package is on git [0] and on Debian Mentors [1]. [0] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/deadbeef.git;a=summary [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dea

Re: RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)

2010-12-12 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
I pushed deadbeef to git [0] (this will make reviews and corrections easier to do, I hope). I think I have fixed all the errors found by Paul and Alessio (aside from all the shlib-calls-exit lintian errors, which I'll report to upstream with all the relevant patches), has anyone any other remark

Re: RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)

2010-12-08 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
I re-uploaded the package, since I noticed I forgot to put the text of the BSD license in debian/copyright. Sorry for the inconvenience :) Cheers -- perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{...@_]};and s;\S+;;eg;say~~reverse' ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list p

Re: RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)

2010-12-07 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:18:44PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Perhaps - in addition to full command invoked - also mention which > version of lintian you are using, both of you. The version is the latest (2.4.3) available on Sid. > So please do investigate: Perhaps try figure out which ver

Re: RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)

2010-12-07 Thread Alessio Treglia
Paul, On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > The errors were present on your deb files, produced by an Ubuntu natty > pbuilder on Ubuntu maverick, i686, using lintian v2.4.3ubuntu2 please note that, since Natty, Ubuntu removes all changelogs and this could make lintian complai

Re: RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)

2010-12-07 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 06:22:29PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: >> At first glance, it seems like you're newlining a bit too much on the >> control deps. It's valid, and better then a single line, but see if >> you can hit under

Re: RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)

2010-12-07 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:11:34AM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: >> Anyway, I'd shorten the features list just a bit. > > Done (I think). > >> > P: deadbeef: no-upstream-changelog >> >> Easy to fix: >> >> override_dh_installchange

Re: RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)

2010-12-07 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 02:47:37PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:11:34AM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: Regarding the lintian errors, I get different results from Paul. Even running lintian with -X -E --pedantic (on the changes file) I see no tags and manual checkin

Re: RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)

2010-12-07 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
Hi, On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 06:22:29PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > At first glance, it seems like you're newlining a bit too much on the > control deps. It's valid, and better then a single line, but see if > you can hit under 80, and get more then one to a line. Helps cut out > some scrollin

Re: RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)

2010-12-07 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
Hi, On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:11:34AM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: > Anyway, I'd shorten the features list just a bit. Done (I think). > > P: deadbeef: no-upstream-changelog > > Easy to fix: > > override_dh_installchangelogs: > dh_installchangelogs -pdeadbeef ChangeLog > > > X: dead

Re: RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)

2010-12-06 Thread Alessio Treglia
Hi Alessandro, hi Paul, and thanks for the review! On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > At first glance, it seems like you're newlining a bit too much on the > control deps. It's valid, and better then a single line, but see if > you can hit under 80, and get more then one

Re: RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)

2010-12-06 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "deadbeef". > > * Package name    : deadbeef >  Version         : 0.4.4~dfsg-1 >  Upstream Author : Alexey Yakovenko > * URL             : http://sf.net/projects/deadbeef > * Li

Re: RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)

2010-12-06 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > Is anyone interested in uploading this, or are you just too busy? > Here I am, I need just some hours to start reviewing it. -- Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer         | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Co

Re: RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)

2010-12-06 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
Is anyone interested in uploading this, or are you just too busy? Cheers :) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

RFS: deadbeef (2nd try)

2010-12-04 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "deadbeef". * Package name: deadbeef Version : 0.4.4~dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Alexey Yakovenko * URL : http://sf.net/projects/deadbeef * License : Mostly GPL-2+ and LGPL-2+ Section : sound It b

Re: RFS: deadbeef

2010-12-04 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 01:38:43PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > So the complete version should be this: > > 1.0~dfsg-1 You also answered my question I think, thank you. -- perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{...@_]};and s;\S+;;eg;say~~reverse' ___ pkg-multimedia-

Re: RFS: deadbeef

2010-12-04 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:08:35PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: The upload would be: version-N+dfsgX It had better set something similar to:       version-N~dfsg This makes us

Re: RFS: deadbeef

2010-12-04 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 01:09:38AM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: > It had better set something similar to: > >version-N~dfsg > > This makes us able to drop the ~dfsg component if upstream will decide > to release another DFSG-clean tarball in future. What about the orig.tar? I've been re

Re: RFS: deadbeef

2010-12-03 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote: > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: >> The upload would be: >> >> version-N+dfsgX > > It had better set something similar to: > >       version-N~dfsg > > This makes us able to drop the ~dfsg component if upstream will d

Re: RFS: deadbeef

2010-12-03 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > The upload would be: > > version-N+dfsgX It had better set something similar to: version-N~dfsg This makes us able to drop the ~dfsg component if upstream will decide to release another DFSG-clean tarball in future. Cheers. --

Re: RFS: deadbeef

2010-12-03 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: >> That does not comply with DFSG [1]. > > Sorry if I am annoying, but I was wondering if it would be acceptable > (for you, the Debian Multimedia Team and Debian Policy in general) to > just cut off the non DFSG-compliant parts from the o

Re: RFS: deadbeef

2010-12-03 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
> That does not comply with DFSG [1]. Sorry if I am annoying, but I was wondering if it would be acceptable (for you, the Debian Multimedia Team and Debian Policy in general) to just cut off the non DFSG-compliant parts from the orig.tar.gz. Since they are just plugins the software (which is mostl

Re: RFS: deadbeef

2010-12-02 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 07:58:28PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: > That does not comply with DFSG [1]. > > [1] http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines Thank you, and sorry for having made you waste your time. I think I should have figured that out by myself. Btw just forget about deadbe

Re: RFS: deadbeef

2010-12-02 Thread Alessio Treglia
Alessandro, On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "deadbeef". In debian/copyright I see the following: Files: plugins/ao/eng_qsf/z80.c Copyright: 1998,1999,2000 Juergen Buchmueller, all rights reserved Li

Re: RFS: deadbeef

2010-12-02 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 07:12:17PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > I'm mostly done with the packaging stuff, but I have > some concerns about the fact that it is shipped with many libraries which > are already present in the Debian repository (I'm talking with the > upstream author about this

RFS: deadbeef

2010-12-02 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "deadbeef". * Package name: deadbeef Version : 0.4.4-1 Upstream Author : Alexey Yakovenko * URL : http://sf.net/projects/deadbeef * License : Mostly GPL-2+ and LGPL-2+ Section : sound It builds