>> sorry, but this is simply wrong. Both the format name (3.0 (quilt)) and
>> the development history show that Raphael tries really really hard to
>> simulate the exact behavior of quilt, even if quilt is not installed in
>> the build environment.
>
> Trying "really really hard" is to me a sign of
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 06:46:32PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Do, Mai 27, 2010 at 17:50:50 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:35:02AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:34, Felipe Sateler
wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:54, Jonas Smedegaar
On Do, Mai 27, 2010 at 17:50:50 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:35:02AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:34, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:54, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:09:15AM +0200, Reinh
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:35:02AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:34, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:54, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:09:15AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Yeah - tests should be composed so that _failure_ tr
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:34, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:54, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:09:15AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>>
Yeah - tests should be composed so that _failure_ triggers alternative
action:
test ! -
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:54, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:09:15AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah - tests should be composed so that _failure_ triggers alternative
>>> action:
>>>
>>> test ! -d .git || dh_quilt_unpatch
>>
>> oh right, thanks for pointing
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:09:15AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Yeah - tests should be composed so that _failure_ triggers alternative
action:
test ! -d .git || dh_quilt_unpatch
oh right, thanks for pointing this out.
Is this a basis for consensus? Shall we agree on this variant f
> Yeah - tests should be composed so that _failure_ triggers alternative
> action:
>
> test ! -d .git || dh_quilt_unpatch
oh right, thanks for pointing this out.
Is this a basis for consensus? Shall we agree on this variant for the
clean rule?
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, Ke
> Od: Felipe Sateler
> Jaromir, if you are migrating to 3.0 (quilt) you need to drop the
> --with quilt part of dh invocation, I think.
I tried with and without " --with quilt" invocation both seems to works fine
for me
source/format set to 3.0 and rules file without any extra unpatching scrip
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 05:24:09PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 17:12, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Mi, Mai 26, 2010 at 22:05:58 (CEST), Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
ifneq (,$(wildcard .git/*))
dh_quilt_unpatch
endif
Not bad, but how about in a single line?
,
|
On 26 May 2010 22:24, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 17:12, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Mi, Mai 26, 2010 at 22:05:58 (CEST), Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>>
>>> ifneq (,$(wildcard .git/*))
>>> dh_quilt_unpatch
>>> endif
>>
>> Not bad, but how about in a single line?
>>
>> ,--
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 17:12, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mi, Mai 26, 2010 at 22:05:58 (CEST), Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>
>> ifneq (,$(wildcard .git/*))
>> dh_quilt_unpatch
>> endif
>
> Not bad, but how about in a single line?
>
> ,
> | test -d .git && dh_quilt_unpatch
> `
T
On Mi, Mai 26, 2010 at 22:05:58 (CEST), Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> ifneq (,$(wildcard .git/*))
>dh_quilt_unpatch
> endif
Not bad, but how about in a single line?
,
| test -d .git && dh_quilt_unpatch
`
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
On 26 May 2010 20:53, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mi, Mai 26, 2010 at 20:02:45 (CEST), Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>
>> I am trying use your script above, but getting this error:
>>
>> $ git-buildpackage -S --git-ignore-new
>> dh --with quilt clean
>> dh_testdir
>> debian/rules override_dh_auto_cl
On Mi, Mai 26, 2010 at 20:02:45 (CEST), Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> I am trying use your script above, but getting this error:
>
> $ git-buildpackage -S --git-ignore-new
> dh --with quilt clean
>dh_testdir
>debian/rules override_dh_auto_clean
> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/mira/zita-conv
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 08:02:45PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
FS > More. The unpatch should be done only if within a git repository.
FS > Something like:
FS > override_dh_auto_clean:
FS > if [ -d .git ] ; then \
FS > quilt pop -a \
FS > fi
FS > dh_auto_clean
I am trying use your scr
> Od: Felipe Sateler
RT> > The last consensus was that yes, under the condition that the clean
RT> > target of debian rules restores the working copy to a state that is
RT> > ready for git diff/commit operations. Most commongly this means to
RT> > unpatch in the clean target.
RT> > The intend be
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 05:22, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> On 26 May 2010 02:24, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 18:02, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Od: Felipe Sateler
>>>
>>> RT> > The last consensus was that yes, under the condition that the clean
>>> RT> > target of debian rules
On 26 May 2010 02:24, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 18:02, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>> Od: Felipe Sateler
>>
>> RT> > The last consensus was that yes, under the condition that the clean
>> RT> > target of debian rules restores the working copy to a state that is
>> RT> > ready for
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 18:02, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> Od: Felipe Sateler
>
> RT> > The last consensus was that yes, under the condition that the clean
> RT> > target of debian rules restores the working copy to a state that is
> RT> > ready for git diff/commit operations. Most commongly this mea
> Od: Felipe Sateler
RT> > The last consensus was that yes, under the condition that the clean
RT> > target of debian rules restores the working copy to a state that is
RT> > ready for git diff/commit operations. Most commongly this means to
RT> > unpatch in the clean target.
RT> > The intend be
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:19, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Di, Mai 25, 2010 at 12:42:02 (CEST), Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>
>>
>> switching to source/format 3.0 solved my problem.
>> Now my orig.tar.bz2 is included in .dsc , .changes files and is generated by
>> pbuilder
>>
>> Is using source/format
On Di, Mai 25, 2010 at 12:42:02 (CEST), Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>
> switching to source/format 3.0 solved my problem.
> Now my orig.tar.bz2 is included in .dsc , .changes files and is generated by
> pbuilder
>
> Is using source/format 3.0 fine for team packaging policy?
we (I) should finally update
>>Od: Jonas Smedegaard
>
>>Use git-buildpackage --git-compression=bzip
>>
>>Or better: add a hint about compression type to debian/gbp.conf.
>>See the source of e.g. morituri for an example.
>
>debian/gpg.conf make the trick nicely
>
>git-buildpackage -S now generate orig.tar.bz2
>But when I b
Hi Jaromír (and others),
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 03:33:58AM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Od: Jonas Smedegaard
Use git-buildpackage --git-compression=bzip
Or better: add a hint about compression type to debian/gbp.conf.
See the source of e.g. morituri for an example.
debian/gpg.conf make
Od: Jonas Smedegaard
Use git-buildpackage --git-compression=bzip
Or better: add a hint about compression type to debian/gbp.conf. See
the source of e.g. morituri for an example.
debian/gpg.conf make the trick nicely
git-buildpackage -S now generate orig.tar.bz2
But when I building packag
Od: Jonas Smedegaard
>> Od: Jaromír Mikeš
>
>> few repositories I co-maintain missing pristine-tar.
>> How to add pristine-tar to such existing repo?
>
>I tried:
>$ pristine-tar commit ../zita-convolver_2.0.0.orig.tar.bz2
>and get:
>$ pristine-tar: committed zita-convolver_2.0.0.orig.tar.bz2.
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 09:32:31AM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Od: Jaromír Mikeš
few repositories I co-maintain missing pristine-tar.
How to add pristine-tar to such existing repo?
I tried:
$ pristine-tar commit ../zita-convolver_2.0.0.orig.tar.bz2
and get:
$ pristine-tar: committed zita-co
> Od: Jaromír Mikeš
> few repositories I co-maintain missing pristine-tar.
> How to add pristine-tar to such existing repo?
I tried:
$ pristine-tar commit ../zita-convolver_2.0.0.orig.tar.bz2
and get:
$ pristine-tar: committed zita-convolver_2.0.0.orig.tar.bz2.delta to branch
pristine-tar
Than
29 matches
Mail list logo
