On 17/05/2023 08:18, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
On 16.05.23 22:11, Tom Reed via Postfix-users wrote:
For OpenDMARC this setting:
SPFSelfValidate true
this only causes opendmarc to resolve SPF itself instead of using existing
Authentication-Results: header.
Actually (from
On 16/11/2022 11:45, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I use:
spf-milter (the same source as policyd-spf-python)
opendkim
openarc
opendmarc
so far in soft mode (no rejections)
opendmarc can use results of previous three in its decisions.
Does spf-milter have the same source as policyd-spf-python?
On 25/08/2022 04:41, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
I have a simple 'mail list' where an alias 'ct...@sbt.net.au' sends email
to several recipients, that's been in use since long time.
today noticed one of these addresses started bouncing with '5.7.1 SPF
unauthorized mail' since just today:
what am I
On 08/05/2022 11:59, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Dear Bastian,
Bastian Blank writes:
Hi
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 07:42:00PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
May 8 10:24:25 bionic190316003 postfix/smtpd[10918]: warning:
17.188.51.209.list.dnswl.org: RBL lookup error: Host or domain name
not found.
On 13/04/2022 13:29, Jesper Dybdal wrote:
I use amavisd-new for the smtpd instances that receive authenticated
submission.
Are there any significant pros and cons in doing this as a pre-queue
filter (proxy) compared to doing it as a post-queue content filter?
I suspect that it doesn't really
On 06/04/2022 18:09, John Levine wrote:
In my experience, forwarding to Gmail is an exercise in futility. I
got lots of DMARC rejections of entirely legitimate mail that was only
authenticated with SPF but had a strict DMARC policy, so Gmail rejected it.
I too see this, but rarely.
On 06/04/2022 13:26, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
"Ludi Cree" writes:
(...thanks...)
My advice is not to forward to GMail if you can not exclude spam.
^
This is a worthwhile answer for me, thanks!
Agreed that first you must be
On 30/03/2022 15:14, natan wrote:
Hi
It is probably not for this group, but... Maybe someone has such a
solution and can suggest?
I have vuser and vdomain and my working environment (general scheme) :
postfix+haproxy(external 2 x amavis) ...
Spamassassin works
On 22/03/2022 16:40, Benny Pedersen wrote:
OpenDMARC's internal SPF handling will be removed
in a future version.
Modern versions of openDMARC can and should be built with dependency on
libspf2, so would never use the very old internal spf code, and instead
use libspf2
On 05/03/2022 19:26, Gerben Wierda wrote:
On 5 Mar 2022, at 18:23, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 05.03.22 12:43, Gerben Wierda wrote:
A forward zone without a forward address gives SERVFAIL
But I was able to use
forward-zone:
name: "spamhaus.org"
forward-addr:
On 09/02/2022 16:53, Gary Aitken wrote:
Just got the message
smtp; 552 5.3.4 Message size exceeds fixed limit
when attempting to receive a 7MB file:
$ postconf -d | grep size_limit
body_checks_size_limit = 51200
bounce_size_limit = 5
header_size_limit = 102400
mailbox_size_limit =
My understanding is that always_bcc does not work:
- if receive_override_options includes no_address_mappings; or
- after Postfix has forwarded mail internally; or
- for mails generated by Postfix itself
On 10/01/2022 16:28, Zsombor B wrote:
We'd like to debug some emails sent through a multi
On 16/11/2021 22:55, Ruben Safir wrote:
I got an email from cpa...@mrbrklyn.com which is not from
us, as we are mrbrklyn.com
How do I block email with this on the From line
From cpa...@mrbrklyn.com Tue Nov 16 03:59:34 2021
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ru...@mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To:
On 12/11/2021 04:53, Walt Pang wrote:
How to set up postfix to forward all my domain's email to gmail, and
enable authentication for SMTP outgoing messages?
The good news is that we have had this working for our own domains for
years. The bad news is that I don't have the time to explain our
On 08/11/2021 08:43, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2021-11-06 Wietse Venema wrote:
li...@lazygranch.com:
Reply-To: jm84450...@gmail.com
Use header_checks (not body_checks) if you want to block that.
Still, I would be concerned about rejecting legitimate email.
It's true that this can reject
On 05/11/2021 10:20, Gionatan Danti wrote:
Il 2021-11-05 09:36 Dominic Raferd ha scritto:
Why permit auth connections on port 25? Restrict them to 587 and/or
465 then you can specify subject rewriting for (all) mails arriving
via port 25. (And you can use postscreen on port 25.)
Yeah
On 04/11/2021 21:51, Gionatan Danti wrote:
Dear all,
I was tasked to mark all messages coming from unauthenticated clients
(ie: incoming emails) with a specific subject line.
While subject rewrite is trivial per-se (via header_checks), I am having
big issues rewriting only selected messages. I
On 29/10/2021 05:24, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 10:14:15PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
postqueue -j | jq -nr --argjson $days '
Correction, that first line should be:
postqueue -j | jq -nr --argjson days $days '
Setting the "jq" variabe "$days" to the shell
BTW, I delete the
hold queue once a day. But never mind, was just wondering if anybody
had written such a script.
#!/bin/bash
# hold_deleter.sh v0.1 by Dominic Raferd [28 Oct 2021]
find_program() {
command -v "$1" || { echo "Cannot locate $1 program; aborted" >&2;
On 19/10/2021 05:59, Maurizio Caloro wrote:
see today logs "SSL_accept Error", please its this a known issue?
installed Postfix 3.4.14, Openssl 1.1.1d, Debian 10.11.
Oct 19 05:59:18 nmail postfix/smtps/smtpd[32720]: SSL_accept error
from 232.115.xx.xx.static.ip.windstream.net[40.138.xx.xx]:
On 25/08/2021 04:01, Jean-François Bachelet wrote:
Hello ^^)
In the today's report I've got from PFLogsumm about the Postfix
activity from yesterday I have a warning that I see here :
Aug 24 19:48:55 servername postfix/postfix-script[1187]: warning:
On 23/08/2021 14:02, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
Hi,
I cannot find a previous discussion about this topic here on the mailing list.
We are running postfix instances for a big corporation, which delivers
to MS Exchange / Exchange online backends. We now have gotten the
requirement to mark all
On 16/08/2021 10:21, Ken N wrote:
I was reading this blog posting:
https://www.alexblackie.com/articles/email-authenticity-dkim-spf-dmarc/
But I am confused that, what content should DKIM signature for?
The message body or headers? what headers should be signed?
The body is always included
On 30/07/2021 18:05, Wietse Venema wrote:
Hadmut Danisch:
Hi,
we are experiencing permanent high traffic from numerous sites trying to
smtp auth to our postfix node, obviously trying to brute force password
dictionaries against mail address lists probably taken from spam lists
(including lots
On 29/07/2021 17:24, Josh Good wrote:
On 2021 Jul 29, 10:01, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On 29 Jul 2021, at 8:17 am, raf wrote:
The Rhenus email did say:
"...must be sent with the TLS 1.2 protocol or higher.
Any mail received without fulfilling this condition
will be rejected by our
On 14/07/2021 08:43, raf wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:38:00PM +1000, raf wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 06:06:16PM -0400, post...@ptld.com wrote:
Viktor wrote:
That's because DMARC (which I don't use or recommed)
Why don't you recommend DMARC? What is wrong with it? Do you accept
On 03/07/2021 07:48, @lbutlr wrote:
When going to https://www.postfix.org I get, after an invalid certificate
error,...
The correct address is http://www.postfix.org (no https...)
Remove the slash after unix:
On Sat, 26 Jun 2021, 08:38 , wrote:
> Run with Debian 10
>
> I dont see why “spamass.sock: No such file or directory” this message
> appair
>
>
>
> >mail.log
>
> Jun 26 09:27:12 nmail postfix/smtps/smtpd[9509]: warning: connect to
> Milter service
On 20/04/2021 10:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 2021-04-16 12:03, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> I have started using a REDIRECT action in a header_checks table
> which works but seems to prevent always_bcc from operating -
> the email is not bcc'd.
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021, 20:07 Rob McGe
On 14/06/2021 15:51, Linda Pagillo wrote:
Thanks everyone. I'm still at a loss here. I have tried everything you
guys have suggested and it's also not a firewall issue so at this
point I have no idea why I can't get this to work. Currently I have
the following in my master.cf
On 24/05/2021 11:01, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-05-24 11:47, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On 24/05/2021 10:33, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-05-24 08:02, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On 24/05/2021 02:10, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 03:00 +0200, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
I see
On 24/05/2021 10:33, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-05-24 08:02, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On 24/05/2021 02:10, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 03:00 +0200, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
I see following lines in my log (pasted below). What do these errors
mean? Is somebody sending garbage
On 24/05/2021 02:10, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 03:00 +0200, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
I see following lines in my log (pasted below). What do these errors
mean? Is somebody sending garbage characters to my server?
Same here
May 24 00:25:11 mx2 postfix/trivial-rewrite[13453]:
On 13/05/2021 16:12, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 13.05.21 12:12, Dominic Raferd wrote:
But it doesn't stop them sending from a different domain that is not
listed in my virtual_alias_domains, such as f...@gmail.com. Currently
I stop this with my own check_sender_access file (in an smtpd
On 13/05/2021 12:26, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 13.05.21 12:12, Dominic Raferd wrote:
But it doesn't stop them sending from a different domain that is not
listed in my virtual_alias_domains, such as f...@gmail.com. Currently
I stop this with my own check_sender_access file (in an smtpd
My domains are listed in virtual_alias_domains and my legit
senders/recipients in virtual_alias_maps.
I recently discovered the 'reject_unlisted_sender' option which
successfully prevents (auth) senders from sending from an unknown
name@mydomain. For instance f...@timedicer.co.uk is blocked
On 26/04/2021 13:31, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
On 26/04/2021 12:56, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On 26/04/2021 10:16, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
I'm seeing a disturbing (but minority) number of hosts that class our
mail is spam. After some digging, I've found an interesting test
case. What I'm uncertain
On 26/04/2021 10:16, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
I'm seeing a disturbing (but minority) number of hosts that class our
mail is spam. After some digging, I've found an interesting test
case. What I'm uncertain of is if this represents a config error on
our side or a (grossly) misbehaving mail
On 21/04/2021 16:17, Alex wrote:
I have postfix configured in a multi-instance setup in conjunction
with amavisd. I'm using always_bcc to create a copy of each email sent
or received.
The problem is that, while postfix appears to deliver the bcc-user
email separately from the other recipients,
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021, 20:07 Rob McGee, wrote:
> On 2021-04-16 12:03, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> > I have started using a REDIRECT action in a header_checks table
> > which works but seems to prevent always_bcc from operating -
> > the email is not bcc'd.
>
> It's ugly
On 16/04/2021 18:39, Wietse Venema wrote:
Dominic Raferd:
I have started using a REDIRECT action in a header_checks table which
works but seems to prevent always_bcc from operating - the email is not
bcc'd.
REDIRECT is a blunt tool that ignores all recipients. If there are
multiple redirect
I have started using a REDIRECT action in a header_checks table which
works but seems to prevent always_bcc from operating - the email is not
bcc'd.
I tried adding a subsequent BCC action triggered by the same header text
but it has no effect. I realise that this is consistent with
On 31/03/2021 17:29, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-03-31 18:21, Dan Mahoney wrote:
problem is your setup used Sender-ID with is long time depricated
Why would you advise not using libspf2?
atleast not in opendmarc, sid-milter is imho fine
but it bulds in both cases of depricated Sender-ID
On 20/03/2021 18:52, Rahul Dhesi wrote:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, Dominic Raferd wrote:
You may find my script helpful:
https://www.timedicer.co.uk/programs/help/relay-enforcer.sh.php
Looks very interesting, thanks. I ran 'shellcheck' on it and saw many
scary warnings; highly recommended
On 20/03/2021 01:53, Rahul Dhesi wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021, Wietse Venema wrote:
See examples in:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#default_delivery_status_filter
(this was originally designed to turn soft TLS errors into hard ones).
Thanks, that is a vey nice feature I did not know
On 19/03/2021 11:14, Leo Baltus wrote:
Running postfix in k8s and using cert-manger to manage certificates it would be
nice
if postfix could pickup new certificates for long running processes like smtpd.
Much like it picks up updated databases like those managed by postmap.
I do not see any
On 18/03/2021 10:36, Burn Zero wrote:
I have a relay server named smtprelayservername which accepts emails
from various clients. So one of the clients complain that they receive
this error while sending email:
Error 4.4.2 Error: timeout exceeded
But I have checked in the relay server
On 12/03/2021 02:35, Dan Mahoney wrote:
On Mar 11, 2021, at 1:00 AM, Dominic Raferd <mailto:domi...@timedicer.co.uk>> wrote:
This works for me:
# grep ^RejectFailures /etc/opendmarc.conf # (note: false is the
default anyway)
RejectFailures false
That’s orthogonal.
RejectFail
On 10/03/2021 19:00, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
All,
I'm working with the OpenDMARC folks on doing bug triage, and someone
has requested that if a domain's policy says p=quarantine, that it
should be "accepted" by postfix, and left for something like
SpamAssassin to deal with. (I don't see
On 05/03/2021 12:40, Peter White wrote:
...I tried using said alternate identity by using mutt an simply changing
the "From" header. It kind of works but seems to leak my real email
address, because the "Return-Path" still points to the main address.
..
This is not a postfix issue. In .muttrc:
On 04/03/2021 11:42, Steve Dondley wrote:
On 03.03.21 18:23, Steve Dondley wrote:
I have enabled the always_bcc setting with:
always_bcc = exam...@example.org
It works, but I'm getting everything three times. How do I prevent duplicates?
this can happen if you use content_filter that feeds
On 22/02/2021 14:07, Wietse Venema wrote:
Dominic Raferd:
I used to run postfix chrooted but no longer do so.
|find /var/spool/postfix -type f -ls|
shows a list of files in /var/spool/postfix/pid/ with names inet.* and
unix.*, all very old and zero-length. Is this a hangover from running
On 22/02/2021 08:19, Dominic Raferd wrote:
I used to run postfix chrooted but no longer do so.
|find /var/spool/postfix -type f -ls|
shows a list of files in /var/spool/postfix/pid/ with names inet.* and
unix.*, all very old and zero-length. Is this a hangover from running
postfix chrooted
I used to run postfix chrooted but no longer do so.
|find /var/spool/postfix -type f -ls|
shows a list of files in /var/spool/postfix/pid/ with names inet.* and
unix.*, all very old and zero-length. Is this a hangover from running
postfix chrooted? Can I remove them all?
It also shows a few
On 17/02/2021 14:49, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2021-02-16 18:34:32 -0200, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Feb 16, 2021, at 3:57 PM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
In what way does that improve your security over the default, which
allows 1.0 and 1.1?
As stated this is for auth clients i.e. our own
On 16/02/2021 17:41, Bill Cole wrote:
On 16 Feb 2021, at 5:46, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On 16/02/2021 10:28, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
I have a client that's triggering these errors in my logs (and is
therefore unable to send even though he can read mail ok):
postfix/submission/smtpd[310140
On 16/02/2021 10:28, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
I have a client that's triggering these errors in my logs (and is
therefore unable to send even though he can read mail ok):
postfix/submission/smtpd[310140]: connect from [...]
postfix/submission/smtpd[310140]: SSL_accept error from
On 12/02/2021 18:35, Chris Green wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 01:08:07PM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:14:24AM +, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On 12/01/2021 01:21, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 01:00:26AM +, JL (Postfix Readers A/c) wrote
On 12/01/2021 01:21, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 01:00:26AM +, JL (Postfix Readers A/c) wrote:
Can someone point me at the right place in the docs, or offer advice
which maybe could also be added to the docs (!) to help others?
Each main.cf parameter documents its
On 11/02/2021 09:32, Eugene Podshivalov wrote:
Is it safe enough nowadays to drop dmarc failed incoming mail with
opendmarc?
I would say not. I quarantine DMARC failures but do not reject - there
are still fps because of misconfiguration by senders or mailing lists
that are not
On 09/02/2021 12:36, @lbutlr wrote:
On 09 Feb 2021, at 04:23, Dominic Raferd wrote:
This shows plenty of 'good' servers still using TLSv1 or TLSv1.1 - including
the postfix-users list servers. Of course they would probably downgrade to
plaintext if required, but that would reduce security
On 09/02/2021 10:58, @lbutlr wrote:
On 09 Feb 2021, at 03:53, @lbutlr wrote:
Looking over the last few days, I see connections rom servers I do not accept
mail from, so it looks to me based on my logs that I could easily reject TLSv1
or TLSv1.1 without missing a single mail.
Meant to
On 08/02/2021 08:04, Eugene Podshivalov wrote:
There are a bunch of spiders and spammers nowadays which are knocking
the service every hour or so every day. Postfix has a really powerful
access control system to protect itself but it becomes a bit hard to
read the log file flooded by the
On 30/01/2021 20:22, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 01:20:13PM -0500, Phil Stracchino wrote:
I'm looking at implementing a rule to discard all
four-letter-and-above TLDs except whitelisted ones, because I'm tired
of playing whack-a-mole.
I'd like to strongly advise against
On 27/01/2021 13:47, David Bürgin wrote:
Thanks everybody – I’ve decided that for me personally handling this is
too much work, and I’ve disabled this particular milter.
(There is an open issue in the OpenDMARC project that I have upvoted:
On 26/01/2021 15:46, Ruben Safir wrote:
I am getting this strange rejections to talk to NYC government
Final-Recipient: rfc822; cdeut...@council.nyc.gov
Original-Recipient: rfc822;cdeut...@council.nyc.gov
Action: delayed
Status: 4.4.3
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; delivery temporarily suspended:
On 26/01/2021 07:13, David Bürgin wrote:
I’ve recently begun using the ‘hold’ queue, because of a milter that I
use. A milter may ‘quarantine’ a message, which causes the message to be
placed in the ‘hold’ queue (eg OpenDMARC does this when the DMARC policy
requests quarantine).
But how does
On 16/12/2020 11:07, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
I have a check to reject 'fancy TLDs' as below
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
check_sender_access pcre:/etc/postfix/sender_pcre,
check_sender_access pcre:/etc/postfix/reject_domains
cat
On 07/12/2020 14:58, Chris Green wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 02:34:14PM +, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On 07/12/2020 13:11, Chris Green wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:01:16PM +, Chris Green wrote:
[snip]
While I'm about it why am I getting identical mail.log and mail.info
files
On 07/12/2020 13:11, Chris Green wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 01:01:16PM +, Chris Green wrote:
[snip]
While I'm about it why am I getting identical mail.log and mail.info
files created in /var/log on the Pi?
I could still do with an answer to this.
Check contents of /etc/rsyslog.d
On 23/11/2020 16:34, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Not to waste anyone's time, but I posted this on SA list and a Sophos site, but, came up with zip.
Not even a "do-dah". Beyond "experiences"
any leads to general "how to: guides that work in practice?
SOHO system, on virtual machines. Fairly
On 28/10/2020 15:53, Allen Coates wrote:
On 28/10/2020 15:24, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 09:05:40AM +, Allen Coates wrote:
Some time ago (5 years maybe) I discovered that "OK" was not being universally
recognised in every access list; I cultivated the habit of
On 23/10/2020 09:27, Nick Tait wrote:
On 22/10/20 6:13 am, PGNet Dev wrote:
Before I take this up as an opendmarc question (my config &/or bug),
& do more thorough digging re: intuit's published records,
(1) Is there anything obviously wrong/missing in that^ XCLIENT usage
generally, or in
On 22/10/2020 00:39, PGNet Dev wrote:
On 10/21/20 4:31 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
PGNet Dev:
Two questions:
clear.
i'll focus just on just the dmarc bits.
both debugging opendmarc, and replacing it with another option to see
if behavior changes.
xclient's extremely helpful in any case.
On 16/10/2020 22:04, David Wells wrote:
I have a postfix-3.3.2 installation (installed from source on
slackware 14.2 from the slackbuilds package) that does rbl checks in
the smtpd_recipient_restrictions section. I have been seeing an
increasing amount of spam coming in so I added more
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 04:03, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
>
> Is there something I should be doing to mitigate this problem?
>
> Oct 8 02:11:42 myserver postfix/smtpd[11630]: connect from
> unknown[180.123.163.212]
> Oct 8 02:11:43 myserver postfix/smtpd[11632]: connect from
>
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 14:04, Vieri Di Paola wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:34 PM Tom Sommer wrote:
> >
> > So SASL user "t...@example.com" would be able to send only from
> > "@example.com".
>
> smtpd_sender_login_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/login_maps.pcre
>
> content of
What about having multiple different smtpd services on different
ports; then set up the LAN mail agents to send to whichever port is
appropriate for their access, and you can have entirely bespoke
settings for each one.
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 10:02, Hans van Zijst wrote:
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> Thanks
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 09:12, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 09:48:28AM +0100, Dominic Raferd wrote:
>
> > My mail servers, with LetsEncrypt certificates, seem to be working
> > perfectly (sending to, and receiving from, the world), but I h
My mail servers, with LetsEncrypt certificates, seem to be working
perfectly (sending to, and receiving from, the world), but I have
never set any of:
smtp_tls_CAfile
smtp_tls_CApath
smtpd_tls_CAfile
smtpd_tls_CApath
tls_append_default_CA
Should I be setting any of these?
iveness of the spam filtering but it seems like
> a setting that wouldn't be commonly used as Google's defaults are
> usually pretty good and we don't tend to get rejected in daily use.
>
>
> On 12/09/2020 14:53, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> > Just after I sent my reply to your
On 14/09/2020 15:09, IL Ka wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 4:53 PM Dominic Raferd
mailto:domi...@timedicer.co.uk>> wrote:
On 14/09/2020 14:31, IL Ka wrote:
> Hello.
> I have postfix running on linux box.
>
> I setup OpenDKIM with both smtpd and non_smtp mil
On 14/09/2020 14:31, IL Ka wrote:
Hello.
I have postfix running on linux box.
I setup OpenDKIM with both smtpd and non_smtp milters.
I also set my address in DNS as permitted IP for SPF.
So far, so good.
But I want all my mail to be forwarded to gmail.
Some user sends me email from
On 14/09/2020 11:35, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
I am receiving spam, where the "header from" is my actual email (ie, the
email that this spam is delivered to)
The "envelope from" that I see in postfix logs is some random email.
What mechanisms are there to reject such messages, which use my
on.'
You can read what Google say at that link. There is nothing in your
email that looks at all like spam to me.
Are you able to fix the DMARC entry in your DNS? It has spurious escaped quotes.
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 12:15, Dominic Raferd wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 22:49, Julian
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 11:29, Leonardo Rodrigues
wrote:
>
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Trying to enable smtp_tls_* on my server for allowing emails
> delivery to the world using TLS (not smtpd_tls_*, those are working just
> fine for years).
>
> While i could get it working fine, i'm
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 08:36, Guido Goluke, MajorLabel
wrote:
>
> I have a setup where I filter smtp mail with:
>
> smtpd_milters=unix:/spamass/spamass.sock,
> unix:/var/run/opendkim/opendkim.sock
>
> and non-smtp mail with
>
> non_smtpd_milters=unix:/spamass/spamass.sock,
>
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 16:31, Forums wrote:
>
> This action modify "From:" and "Reply To:" when you send an email from your
> Gmail account.
>
> I don't want to send email from a different "From:" address when I use my
> Gmail account.
>
> The only thing I wanted is to have the good sender
On 06/07/2020 20:53, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 07:40:27PM +, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
I use postfix for my own domain and have been forwarding my email to
outlook.com for years. Recently, email has just been disappearing
between my server and my inbox so I set it to
On 18/06/2020 17:17, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 15:03, Wietse Venema wrote:
Dominic Raferd:
I understand the reason for smtp_line_length_limit and for its default
value of 998, which is of course good.
It breaks DKIM signatures, it is needed only for mail that is sent
via
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 15:03, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Dominic Raferd:
> > I understand the reason for smtp_line_length_limit and for its default
> > value of 998, which is of course good.
>
> It breaks DKIM signatures, it is needed only for mail that is sent
> via
I understand the reason for smtp_line_length_limit and for its default
value of 998, which is of course good.
But it is an occasional problem for me that this wrapping action is
only applied at smtp stage and not earlier; in particular it is after
any (open)dkim milter adds its key, because
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 09:46, David Hartley wrote:
>
> I am running Postfix on a Synology NAS using DSM 6.2
>
> In general I can receive emails, however I cannot receive emails
> from@ btinternet.com.
>
> An example of the sender's failure report is:
>
> Reporting-MTA: dns;
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 08:13, David Hobley
wrote:
> Sorry, that got sent prior to my completing the email. I'll try again.
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf
> alias_maps =
> append_dot_mydomain = no
> compatibility_level = 2
> ...
> myorigin = /etc/mailname
...
> virtual_alias_domains =
>
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 16:11, PGNet Dev wrote:
> On 6/8/20 7:12 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> > main.cf <http://main.cf>:
> >
> > rbl_reply_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/rbl_reply_maps.pcre
> > postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map =
> pcre:/etc/postfix/postscreen_dnsbl_re
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 15:07, PGNet Dev wrote:
>
> in my logs, i see, e.g.
> Jun 8 06:49:08 mx postfix/dnsblog[21103]: addr 151.20.170.84
> listed by domain .zen.dq.spamhaus.net as 127.0.0.10
>
> with the "" clearly displayed.
>
> have you a setting/map in postfix that simply
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 09:54, Forums wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> Sorry for my english I'm french.
>
> I have a private mail server (at home) with my domain name.
>
> I have about 5% of my emails rejected by some SMTP servers for the
> following reasons:
>
> - rDNS is KO (my french provider don't give
Is there a command-line tool that can simulate postfix's ip-matching syntax
with semicolons and double dots?
# echo "127.0.0.3"|grepcidr "127.0.0.[1;3;5]"
grepcidr: Not a valid pattern: 127.0.0.[1;3;5]
# echo "127.0.0.3"|grepcidr "127.0.0.[1..5]"
grepcidr: Not a valid pattern: 127.0.0.[1..5]
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 02:06, Ian Evans wrote:
>
> Based on another thread here, I want to move to using postscreen/postwhite
> and ditch postgrey.
>
> Just want to make sure I don't bungle stopping postgrey.
>
> So...
>
> - edit main.cf and remove "check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10023"
On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 16:09, Alexander Meinhardt
wrote:
> for inexplicable reasons i don't get any results from zen.spamhaus.org
> anymore:
>
> Apr 08 16:20:29 [postfix/dnsblog] warning: dnsblog_query: lookup error
> for DNS query x.x.x.x.zen.spamhaus.org: Host or domain name not found.
> Name
1 - 100 of 450 matches
Mail list logo
