multiple times (I also
of course reported mine there). So neither you nor I are the only one with
this issue...
Now, since maybe a half year, I don't have this problem anymore - so maybe
it is gone for good. But nobody can guarantee that.
We can only say that it's just "Google doing Google
S, I use only their "Dynamic IP" list. That combination seems to
work very well for me.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
__
rtual_alias_maps= table in main.cf file and define the
aliases there.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
ynetworks, so please post these parameters.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
Postfix-us
stalling Postfix on a Debian machine. You get four
or five (AFAIR) choices of configuration presets to start with, and
"Internet Site" is one of them.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hus
f domains from which mail should be accepted, you can
configure that in mailman too.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy
o specify who is able to send to the list (usually the choice is
everyone/subscribers only/moderators only, sometimes additionally you can
block or allow particular senders).
So please describe more clearly, what do you actually want to do.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In
?
And if "client=" is the original client (ie. all messages come from your
local host), where does "orig_client=" come from?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and
articular alias) to a separate maildir.
I'm sure there are newer tools with the same functioality as procmail
available.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a
after 4h and send it only once?
I guess the internal server is not Postfix, because by default Postfix does
not send notifications about temporary failures (delay_warning_time is set
to 0 by default).
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, whe
en domain, not the
addresses from which mail is sent. These would be specified in SPF record
(if present).
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy
> but for me mutt is accessing the mailstore via IMAP.
I don't want to bother with additional configuration of Postfix/Dovecot/mutt
for this, if local(8) works just out of the box. The simpler the better - at
least this is my view...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In
store should
> own the mailbox, not the user.
Well, I'm an old school type... :) I prefer to ssh to the server and launch
mutt or something similar to access my mail :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once t
this is the most easy and natural way to go...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
g
subject lines, with the LAST characters being the most meaningful, then the
recipients themselves wouldn't be able to recognize the messages properly,
because most email clients don't display as many characters in the subject
when displaying a list of messages in the inbox.
--
Regards,
Jar
e code, just change them to a value that suits
you and rebuild Postfix for yourself.
It's one of the advantages of being open source, anyway.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived
arded to extu...@example.net, and not
delivered to local user simon (but the same applies to all mail addressed to
local user simon, regardless of the origin).
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a
Dnia 15.01.2024 o godz. 09:34:06 Admin Beckspaced via Postfix-users pisze:
> do i need to be worried?
As your logs clearly show it's Shodan, then either ignore it or simply block
it right away.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go t
]
> That was a long time ago. Postfix has evolved as the Internet has
> changed. I am continuing the overhaul of this software, motivated
> by people like you on this mailing list.
Big thanks and congratulations, Wietse!
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a mill
(not 587, as 465 is TLS-wrapped submission and 587 is STARTTLS) on your mail
server.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived
pamass-milter, are regenerating this header on their own
(using information from smfi_connect()) and pass it to spamassassin.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpu
s backups? It
should.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
Postfix-users mailing li
domains you want to
accept as recipients, and "reject" anything else by default.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
__
's the restriction that is rejecting your message.
When you send mail locally using the "mail" command, it does not come in via
SMTP, so smtpd_*_restrictions don't apply.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when k
end users (in case of web server, you
mentioned Apache) that can use IPv4 only.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy
, which their staff
> was able to fix in the meantime. I find it interesting how this
> particular server has been running for years without these issues
> manifesting, until yesterday.
Maybe it wasn't rebooted until now? (as PXE is a boot-related feature) :)
--
Regards,
Jaros
ierie.fr>
>
> How can I block them, please ?
If these addresses don't exist on your server, the server should reject
the mail, isn't it enough?
(If the server doesn't reject, yo did something wrong in the configuration.)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a
. Messages were sometimes deferred even for 8-10 hours before they
got through.
It happened out of nowhere (no setup changes on my side), lasted about a
week and disappeared by itself.
Until now I don't know why it was so. I guess it's just Google doing Google
things...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Ra
il.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfi
rect". (Of course, I mean here SPF with "-all", if you use
"~all" or "?all", that's tolerable).
Myself, I always was and still am for the second option.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna k
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfi
rds,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
T
to parameter, it should keep copies of
sparse files being sparse.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her dad
to log this username?
Cyrus SASL should log this. Is it possible to configure it to log the
username?
I'm using Dovecot for SASL and (with default settings) the username is
logged *by Dovecot*.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school
There is no need for SASL authentication on port 25, which is used to
receive mail. So turn off SASL auth on this port completely.
Allow SASL authentication only on submission ports (465 and 587), then you
can firewall IP in question on ports while keeping port 25 open.
--
Regards,
e else and if you have something *really
sensitive* to send, either take effort to set up end-to-end encryption,
or use another method of communication.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school,
such email as unencrypted.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
Postfix-users maili
nd all ideas!
The best idea here is to run your own spam filtering directly on your
server, and not rely on any external service.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she liv
Microsoft, discussed currently
on mentioned "mailop" list in the following thread: "outlook.com 421 try
again later S77719".
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she l
filter based on that domain,
and use this as a content_filter.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
.
For me, it is very clear what the OP wants to do. He has some cron jobs or
other background applications running on his server and wants the emails
generated by these applications to be sent to his Gmail account.
Quite common case.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a milli
email account, you don't need a full-fledged MTA like Postfix.
You can install something simpler that is just a SMTP client, for example
msmtp, which has been designed just for such use cases.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, th
ail clients open
IMAP session and get mail first before trying to send anything) - if not,
the connection is immediately rejected without even allowing the client to
try AUTH.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know:
ur home Postfix.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix
.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html#in_virtual_other . It is also
described in Dovecot documentation:
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/howto/postfix_dovecot_lmtp/
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: on
- what that
> might be?
Did you define in the Postfix config that Postfix should handle mail for
domain some.xyz ? Like "mydestination=", "virtual_mailbox_domains=" or
"virtual_alias_domains=" (depending on how do you deliver mail for that
domain).
--
Regards,
nt and nobody - even Google employees - knows how they actually
work). They don't rely on commonly available tools like Spamassassin.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a
t is by design. So no probes are necessary.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
Postfix-users mail
domain. Without the first line ("example.org anything") this doesn't
work.
Instead of this, you can also add a line "virtual_alias_domains = domain2.tld"
to main.cf.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when ki
a bounce, they
know myu...@mydomain.com does not accept their mail. I guess they can use
this knowledge to remove the address from their mailing list, but who knows
what they are doing with it actually...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go
> that gmail is perfecr, but neither is Postfix.
This does not apply to my case (although may apply to OP's case) - I have
manually checked the logs, and I did not send at that time to any other
domain hosted at Google than gmail.com.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
&quo
anyway to send mail, so that doesn't seem to
solve anything.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
(sorry, I can't recommend anything, but I'm sure
someone else on this list can).
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
message not sent.
For this, you don't need to submit messages via SMTP (you actually don't
need submission services runing at all), just via /usr/sbin/sendmail like
cron, sudo etc. usually do.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're
t connect, do valid AUTH
(using proper credentials!) and then hang up.
People in that thread suspect that this behavior might be associated with
connections from Outlook mobile app being proxied by MS servers. Probably
something went wrong there.
No definite conclusion yet.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Ra
erface. (assuming of course
everything is installed on the same server)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in
the
Internet? Is your iDRAC communicating with remote Postfix somewhere on the
Internet, and not on the same machine where iDRAC is mounted? (I assumed
this is the case...)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: onc
r client IP address. This should cause
the mail to be sent unencrypted.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
__
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.o
. Of course
you always need to check it by actually viewing the file.
I use that approach when pulling false positives out of my spam folder and
moving to main inbox, after I have adjusted my filters to not catch this
type of messages.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a
hey come from Thunderbird. When a mail client retrieves mail
from the server, it has no idea of how the mail files are actually named on
the server. It names them by its own.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to sc
pinion (also not being a lawyer), that's a very far-fetched
interpretation of the GDPR.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her dad
requirement in any EU law.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
Postfix-users mailing
o the
resolved address, and finds out the resolved address is its own address -
hence "loops back to myself".
You have to make Postfix recognize "home" as its locally-handled hostname.
"mydestination=" maybe?
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"
ly addresses should be enough, and if the mail is
going outside, the gateway machine adds a domain part to all domainless
addresses in the headers.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and
I just install and configure Dovecot with Postifx delivering
> mail to /var/mail?
>
> ... and is Dovecot the way to go?
Yes, that's probably the simplest thing you can do :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they
to new Linux-based server).
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
Postfix-users mailing list
livered to
root's mailbox (unless you also aliased root to something else - but it is
strongly discouraged to do that and in many systems such a coment is even
included in the default /etc/aliases file).
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to
h that Dovecot knows where to put the mail.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
Postfix-user
nfigurable rDNS is not
available to you at all within the scope of consumer-oriented services. You
must be a registered business to qualify for business-oriented services,
where such options are available. So the price doesn't matter, if you can't
buy something at all :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r
gt; or, yes, pay someone to relay your mail.
That seems to be the only option.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived
h connection, so performance would be
poor on a high traffic site, it would need to be rewritten. But for my low
traffic server it's good enough.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpup
l company server that nobody outside the
company's network should be accessing.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
__
not a policy service.
However, milters are harder to write.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
t; and other such utilities. It's a different way to do things.
And probably the oldest one of them, fetchmail - roughly developed at the
same times as procmail. Some people still use it.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're
could reject messages that fail SPF "absolutely" and just ignore "normal"
SPF failures (as I don't intend to check SPF on incoming mail from "normal"
domains and don't actually do it now). However, I don't know any tool that
makes this distinction and I'm not desperate eno
- what exact result you want to obtain.
Myself, I would recommend neither. But everyone has different needs and
goals. My goal is to lose as little legitimate mail as possible, so I
completely ignore SPF, DKIM and DMARC on incoming mail.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a
st passes on the
authentication data to SASL authentication provider, which can be either
Cyrus or Dovecot, depending on what you are using for email access.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy,
dentials to Dovecot, which is
the authentication provider. So you have probably configure this in Dovecot,
not in Postfix.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she live
ion) whatever the
TCP stack in your OS chooses.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
t mentioning *.gov.pl !) addressing scheme - to be
more confusing ;), in parallel to direct registrations in *.pl, and to
geographical per-city scheme like *.krakow.pl, *.waw.pl, *.gda.pl etc.
And please look at my email address as well :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"I
t 25 (btw. this also largely
reduces the scale of password-guessing attacks). Port 25 is considered to be
strictly for incoming mail (to "local" domains), and ports 465/587 are for
outgoing mail (usually to "non-local" domains, although one may as well send
to another local domain
onsidering all usual restrictions - the recipient exists, the
sending IP is not on a blacklist etc.)
- mail for all non-local domains coming in on port 25 should be outright
rejected with "Relay access denied" (or similar) message.
There is no authenticated submission on port 25.
--
Regards,
on port 25, or no authentication is allowed on
port 465 or 587, someone has misconfigured something.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub.&
t;spam" outgoing server, it
effectively makes the forwarding non-functional.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
_
; list. You
can subscribe to it at https://www.mailop.org/ .
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
___
ample.com, then yes. If you don't, and you will be only
sending mail as someth...@example.com, you don't need to bother with SPF
record for mail.example.com at all.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
w
rned about the UTF8 thing, I would never think of using
non-ASCII characters in host/domain names :)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived
r served spending your time and efforts on the
> primary server.
If I remember correctly, someone mentioned NoListing recently on that list.
For this, you *need* a secondary MX, and it is actually your main mail
server - the primary MX never accepts mail...
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r..
ccesses them.
It accesses them to check if the recipient exists - if not, it has to reject
the mail.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her dad
;check_sender_access". For this you need either a
domain or a full email address.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
designed with mailing lists in mind, only for direct
one-to-one mail, and that's the main problem.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy
and the server at AWS, and
then ran tcpdump the whole day on the AWS server watching for any packets
that are coming from my server. Nothing came.
So I find it highly improbable that any strange packets can be coming from
my server to yours. I don't know the source of these packets.
--
Regards,
time on last system in the delivery chain.
Aren't the "Received:" headers already containing the timestamps you want?
--
Pozdrowienia,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived wi
to "host 217.144.132.164" and there's no other traffic except
normal SMTP traffic to port 25. Have no idea where any strange packets might
originate.
--
Pozdrowienia,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
Dnia 22.03.2023 o godz. 16:18:11 Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users pisze:
> >raj@rafa:~$ mailq
> >-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
> >5508C41121 8652 Mon Mar 20 23:35:40 r...@rafa.eu.org
> > (connect to sdaoden.eu[217.144.13
ostfix),
but the mail stays in queue - I get "Connection timed out" to your server.
Please check on your side.
raj@rafa:~$ mailq
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
5508C41121 8652 Mon Mar 20 23:35:40 r...@rafa.eu.org
(connect to sdaoden.eu[217
bout a
server of a company from which I receive emails, as their customer. Their
server can negotiate only TLSv1 with my server. Anyway, it's better than if
they would send their mail unencrypted. And they would, if I set *my* server
to TLSv1.2 minimum (which I don't do).
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa
send mail to me. I think that TLS v1
is still better security than no encryption at all ;)
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and s
akes some sense (requiring TLS>=1.1 for mail *submission*
from your users) - most mail clients are able to conform to this - the latter
(requiring TLS>=1.1 for *incoming* mail on port 25) does not. Don't do it.
--
Regards,
Jaroslaw Rafa
r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when
1 - 100 of 452 matches
Mail list logo
