On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
So, the question is: what purpose does P2 serve when iD is live and the
default?
I think there's two principal niches. One is working with third-party data,
as per Snapshot Server and vector background layers. P2
*crickets*
No active devs left on this list? Did everyone move to iD?
Steve
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Anyone know what the current status of development is? I have a
number of pull requests on Github that have been sitting
Hi all,
Anyone know what the current status of development is? I have a
number of pull requests on Github that have been sitting there for
nearly a year. Richard Fairhurst hasn't responded to the last couple
of emails I've sent him.
I keep seeing bugs I'd like to fix, but if pull requests get
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Very happy with 1 if someone would like to set that up. Very happy with more
people helping to review the code too.
Could we start with a dev branch that all pull requests should be
made to (and are accepted by
/2012 04:30, Steve Bennett wrote:
https://github.com/systemed/potlatch2/pull/33
https://github.com/systemed/potlatch2/pull/36
https://github.com/systemed/potlatch2/pull/49
https://github.com/systemed/potlatch2/pull/66
Seriously, now. These slow review times, and blocking pull requests
, Mar 18, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've cleaned up, improved and reworked my old magic_roundabout
patch, and rebased it off the current master. It's a pretty cool piece
of code, but there's quite a lot of it. Previously there were some
issues with how
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:11 AM, OpenStreetMap t...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Please read the How to be a helpful bug reporter paragraph on the first
page of trac.osm.org and come back when you can file a helpful report.
Please read how to be an asshole to people who are trying to be
helpful...
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
In Richard's defence, there are over 1500 changesets with a comment of
removing multiple consecutive identical nodes in ways/delete one node ways.
please help by giving hints, about how this potlatch bug can be reproduced
Good to know - I'll take a look next week. Pretty sure I wrote that
code, and it sounds like I missed a special case or two.
Steve
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:44 PM, OpenStreetMap t...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
#4375: Potlatch 2: join nodes function creates duplicate nodes in ways
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Out of interest, Intel or PowerPC?
2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo. 4GB 1067 MHz DDR3. OSX 10.6.8.
Steve
___
Potlatch-dev mailing list
Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Certainly not related because the new version hasn't been deployed on the
main site yet!
It''s only on http://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ currently.
Ooh, is that new? I've been wishing for a bleeding edge build for a
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
- FileBank to allow all images/config files to be stored in a .zip, so you
can load one assets file per P2 instance rather than 300 or so. Should be
live on osm.org in the next few days.
Live now, woot.
Steve
Interesting idea about making follow behave this way when you're not
drawing a node. And shift-F to go backwards?
___
Potlatch-dev mailing list
Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
I would just delete them once they aren't needed anymore.
Delete them locally, you mean? Do you then need to push the deletion?
Steve
___
Potlatch-dev mailing list
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:12 AM, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
How hard would it be have a version of Potlatch2 available after merging for
final testing before becoming the default P2 version on the site? To be
useful it'd need to be able to be invoked with a GPX file (not
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
No, often they don't realise. For example, when there's a supermarket
tagged as an area, they think the supermarket isn't mapped, and try
adding an icon for it. The turquoise building outline (or whatever)
doesn't lead
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Firstly, we need the ability to load alternative map_features files. The
reason that isn't implemented right now is because no-one has coded it. ;)
Hmm, I wonder if potential contributors are possibly put off by the
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
This is happening to me now too (on the Mac, in both Safari and P2). Bit
bemused as to why - nothing has changed in the P2 code that should cause it
AFAIAA. Will look it into it, though probably not until next week
I've just noticed that about a year ago, the designation tag was
added to the common inputSet, meaning it appears on a wide variety
of features:
https://github.com/stevage/potlatch2/commit/e1970c90ae07d1d1bb98692a80d2131ae115ae5e
There are two issues with this:
1) The designation=* tag is
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Any feedback from anyone? I'd love to hear from people who
a) i18n was working 2 months ago and is working now
b) i18n was working 2 months ago and isn't working now
c) i18n was not working 2 months ago but is working
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potlatch_2/Developer_Documentation#Sending_patches
We like patches in any way, but if you're sending a pull request,
please send it to systemed on github ([1]) aka Richard, rather than
Hi all,
I just did a pull request to the Github repository (which is fairly
up to date) but it looks like no one is watching. Is there somewhere
else these pull requests should go? It's here anyway:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/potlatch2/pull/5
This particular issue (tram routes not
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.com wrote:
I edit a lot in the American Southwest, where there are a lot of
natural parks, national forests, preserves and many other natural areas.
However, Potlatch2 includes no category for natural. Wwe used to have
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
A few other things spring instantly to mind - an ill-advised redesign
of the Undo system, a few problems with the Magic Roundabout system
(e.g. having a 50% chance of nuking a way when trying to shorten it)
and, more than
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
If there's any gotchas let me know.
Ok, since you asked:
First you need to get a copy of the potlatch2 repository from
somewhere. It doesn't really matter where it comes from...
...
There's many different ways to share your
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:29 AM, OpenStreetMap t...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
and took about five minutes. People have spent orders of magnitude more
time filing tickets/usability reports/what-have-you about this... than
actually fixing it. If only people were more prepared to roll up their
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Very much intentional behaviour and what you should do!
Fwiw, I found this quite unintuitive and only realised how it worked
after some months of use. It would be good (such helpful words, I
know) to have some kind of
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
1. casing-width is now relative to the stroke width.
OLD: { width: 5; casing-width; 7; }
NEW: { width: 5; casing-width: 1; }
How is this interpreted:
way { width: 5; z-index: 2; }
way { casing-width:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:20 PM, PierZen infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Richard, as you said, the vmatch does the job perfectly with assigning the
value=unspecified
using the following tag definition.
tag k=highway v=unspecified vmatch=primary|secondary|tertiary|footway|track|unspecified/
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Happy to answer any questions, but remember things are neither set in
stone nor necessarily fully thought-through!
Hi Andy,
First - thanks for taking the time to write up this documentation.
My question is about the
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Pierre (PierZen)
infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr wrote:
At this point, the menus are visible but we cannot select the various HOT
categories from the left menu. The HOT dialogues Boxes are not showed
properly.
When selecting a node or a way, and selecting a HOT Menu
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Does that make sense? It not I'll try and draw a diagram. I think there are
some junctions like this on the A4123 between Wolverhampton and Birmingham,
but it's been a while since I drove down there.
Ok, I get it now, but it
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potlatch_2/Developer_Documentation/Overview
Steve
___
Potlatch-dev mailing list
Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
Thanks Ed, with that description it was actually quite easy to fix.
Steve
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
I'm back at my keyboard now. And on the live site I reproduce the problem as
follows:
Go to edit mode. It has correctly remembered that when last
Hi all,
Just wondering if anyone has any cool ideas for features or whatnot,
that they haven't got around to entering as bugs in Trac. I don't have
any immediate code this next, so I'm open to suggestions. Otherwise,
I might explore the simultaneous features issue
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
r25368 should be the base for the functionality freeze. That's certainly not
to say that we abandon the stuff that's been done since then, but we will
separate it into the essentials (a and b above) and the
The main-effect as you call it, is now becoming a side-effect of
adding the action to the composite action. What you've done in that
changeset is break the encapsulation, and screw up the contract of
UndoableAction.doAction().
You mean, provide an alternative contract, I think. :) I might
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
add a separate undo step for every junction. Since only one keypress
causes MakeJunction, it should be undoable in one button press.
MakeJunction should have its own composite action and push things onto
it when it
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
This is where I could be wrong, but I think that it's critical to the
redo part. When undo'ing an action the action is added to the redo
list, so if adding an action has side-effects that'll blow up during
redoing the
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk wrote:
Yeah, what we have is a nested and OO implementation of a simple stack
with markers. This allows you to do cool stuff like encapsulate
complex actions without bothering the user with extra undo steps or
adding lots
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
4) Handle any special cases. (I haven't really looked. It's 3am. The
undo stuff confused me greatly.)
Oh, what do you know, I found one. If two of the ways meeting at the
middle are actually one two ends of one long way
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately it doesn't compile - I think you added a length()
function to Elastic.as but haven't added it in! Also, DrawWay.as#328
needs fixing since that doesn't compile either. Could you have a look
as soon as you
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:10 AM, NopMap ekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
Just to explain the situation: I am running an (unmodified) P2, but I have
built a custom map_feature file from scratch. Of course it would be good to
translate both.
I wonder how this would best work? Maybe we could have auxiliary
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:25 PM, NopMap ekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
I would like one map_features entry that shows only one drop-down box with a
combined list of foot and hiking relations. When you assign relations to an
item, nothing needs to change. When you create a relation or change its
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Aargh, what a lot of confusion. The cycleway=shared|segregated is an
option for standalone ways (either highway=cycleway or highway=path)
to indicate whether the bikes and pedestrians share the same tarmac.
In the UK
No, it won't, for reasons already explained by Nop. Moreover the
current system has the distinct advantage that it can be used to
describe what's on the ground - a stroke of a pen on a planner's chart
I disagree, but as this is a distraction from the actual discussion at
hand, I'll leave it.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
I'm also a little aware (having optimised the CategorySelector stuff
yesterday)
Btw - awesome. :)
Steve
___
Potlatch-dev mailing list
Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, I've just done this a different way, and then read your email. Ho-hum!
Interesting - I'd totally forgotten about my above suggestion. I
actually implemented something extremely similar to your
implementation
Hi all,
Thought I'd solicit comments before implementing the following:
feature
tag k=highway v=tertiary lifecycle=road/
inputSet ref=road_lifecycle/
...
/feature
inputSet id=road_lifecycle
input type=choice presence=onTagMatch name=Life-cycle lifecycle=yes
choice value=
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
My first thought is to just have another couple of highway types ( a
proposed highway and a highway under construction ) with a list of
classifications in a choice input, and maybe some date inputs for when
they are
I just added some node navigation shortcuts in
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25299 . I think they're cool
so thought I'd describe them here:
When a way node is selected, , (aka ) moves down one node, while
. (aka ) goes up a node. If you reach the end of the way, you
loop around.
When
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, are we perhaps reaching the point where not all node features
should be dnd's? For example, I don't think dnd highway=turning_circle
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk wrote:
Segregated cycle path: A path where cyclists and pedestrians are
separated by a painted line or kerb.
Sounds an awful lot like cycleway=track to me.
Shared cycle path: A path where cyclists and pedestrians share the
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
wrote:
I think it's worth being cautious on adding things purely based on
their %age occurrences too - without checking how many people vs 1
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Who would like to see some judgement used in picking icons for the dnd
panel, mutter mutter!
Do tell? I'm probably guilty of whatever the crime is. Do you mean
that the icons just look bad together (all different colours)
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
The places section has five (yes, five) completely identical icons.
Whereas what it probably should be is one icon place with a drop
down specifying the type.
Is anyone interested in map_features supporting this kind of feature
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
My (very) strong preference is not to introduce another mode or extra
configurable options. That way lies JOSM. :)
Wise words.
So I'd suggest:
because we already have it: it's simply a custom stylesheet. As long
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that would be useful, but I'll leave the syntax to others. I
lean strongly towards always showing data in Potlatch, since every
object can be transmorgified into a different type of object. For
example, if you
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
In particular, it'd be great to use this so we could have two core
stylesheets: a Standard one and an Enhanced one.
Would you mind explaining a bit what the original thinking behind
multiple stylesheets in Potlatch 2
Err, in case the previous was confusing, when I say Adobe Flex I
mean Adobe Flex Builder 3.0.2. (Also, does this violate the rule
about not using Flex SDK 3.2?)
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've never used Flex (or done Flash development
Hi Richard,
Let me say up front that I'm more than happy to be picked on :)
I'm not precious about my ideas, so if they're wrong, please demolish
them as fast as possible.
Since writing my original message I did a bit more reading about the
source tag, and I guess it's a bit more optional than
61 matches
Mail list logo
