[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:53:30 -0400
snip
the problem is - this is a Laptop Keyboard. You can't immerse that
sucker without having a little problem or two!
Hi John!
You could remove it from the laptop and wash it out. Or if you are
especially adventuresome, dunk
Paul Hill wrote:
On 6/24/06, petetheisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't say gun crime, I said crime. Crime is up in the UK and
Australia, or at least it is reported to be.
Which is nothing to do with the changes in gun laws. As I said, in
the UK it's extremely rare (and always has been
Leland Jackson wrote:
If WMD are hidden, then you have no way of knowing for sure that there
are hidden WMD, do you? I know many people suspect that WMD were remove
form Iraq to avoid detection by inspector, but there has not been a
single shred of evidence produced substantiating or
Leland Jackson wrote:
Those responsible for the death of so many people share responsibility
and shame, as if a nation had been hypnotized in her justification for
war. Yes, Hitler was responsible for the deaths, even though he may not
have carried out a single execution or killed a single
Michael Madigan wrote:
Anyone who is working for minimum wage isn't trying hard enough to find another
job.
Hi Michael!
Around here all employers pay the same. It is above minimum, but it is
the same. All jobs are dumbed down so that anyone can do them.
People who work here can never get
Michael Madigan wrote:
Hi Michael!
Have to be on their spam list to see it, though.
Regards,
Pete
The enemy within. The NY Times reporters and publisher should be hanged for
treason.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
Leland Jackson wrote:
Hi Leland!
You are correct except for your grammar, but do you not see that this is
the very heart of liberalism? Every time anyone talks about gun rights
the left wingers are up in (non-lethal) arms, so to speak, for good
reason. Public ownership of guns negates their
Leland Jackson wrote:
This is kind of wried
Hi Leland!
Wried it is. However, North Korea is part of the Axis of Evil and
thus is to be kept from having any weapons that could threaten other
countries. That is, if it should not be regime changed in the near future.
Not because Mondale
Stephen the Cook wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
It is wried.
I don't think we can take it out on the launchpad, I think we have to
wait until it goes over Japan, or is headed to the US.
Apparently the last one they fired actually broke up over Alaska
No the Aug. 1998 one flew south of
Paul Hill wrote:
On 6/23/06, petetheisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The criminals *will* be tooled up as you put it. We have to be
ready. Seems to me that the UK and Australia have taken away the
guns.
They were never really taken away as few had them in the first place.
I don't know anyone
Paul Hill wrote:
On 6/23/06, Leland Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why, then, is the US spending billions of dollars building a Star Wars
missile defense system?
When you think about it, you will realized shipping nuclear bombs in
containers by ships is not the way a nuclear exchange
Michael Madigan wrote:
We could improve the human race by killing all the stupid people. LOL
Hi Michael!
Post a list for debate. Not that we would kill them, but have to get an
agreement on who is stupid for ignoring purposes.
Do green hats get Bad people on the stupid list? g
Regards,
Profox wrote:
Yeah like federal funding of gay marriage, abortion, sex changes,
welfare, food stamps,
sensitivity training, and double-ended dildos.
I guess you'd feel better if we federally funded the Catholic schools of
sodomy.
Hi Jim!
Ooooh, that hits a sore spot, PITA.
Regards,
MB Software Solutions General Account wrote:
snip
we stopped giving as much money to some countries because it was not
going to the people but instead to the corrupt and powerful.
Hi Michael!
I think they should give it to me. I could produce a wonderful
spreadsheet telling how much good I
Ken Kixmoeller (j/s) wrote:
On Jun 22, 2006, at 6:36 AM, Stephen the Cook wrote:
he doesn't trust his staff.
Oh, yeah: I forgot to add that part. Restaurants are the most crooked
business with which I have ever been involved. The servers and
bartenders are adept at finding
Leland Jackson wrote:
Well Pete, I didn't know that about good cholesterol. Incidentially how
is your good cholesterol these days? LOL
Hi Leland!
I haven't left any in years. *Never* found a car that would affect it
one way or another.
Regards,
Pete
Leland Jackson wrote:
Nope, I have
David Crooks wrote:
On Thursday, June 22, 2006 3:23 AM Pete Theisen wrote:
The people around me who succeeded *all* were ethically challenged,
to say the
least. Oh, perhaps this had something to do with it?
To me that is just a victim mentality. Comparing your self with others
will
Michael Madigan wrote:
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15722
Hi Michael!
These criminals are traitors during wartime. We should give them a fair
trial first, however, and *then* hang them.
Regards,
Pete
___
Post Messages to:
Profox wrote:
http://rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm
Hmm... Rasmussen must be owned by the RepubliCON's.
I haven't seen any poll lately where Bush was above the 30's.
Hi Jim!
But weren't you looking at common dreams, moveon and the like?
Regards,
Pete
Stephen Russell wrote:
At the same time that Republicans are fighting to exempt the richest
estates from taxes, they are blocking a raise for the nation's poorest
workers.
http://tinyurl.com/jkl2j
Hi Stephen!
Interesting tidbit about the 23% congress approval rating.
Regards,
Pete
Leland Jackson wrote:
Well then, a raise in the minimum wage would not place an undue burden
on Employers, so why did the Republican leadership use parliamentary
procedure to block a vote, thus killing it?
Hi Leland!
Once upon a time, raising the minimum actually did create unemployment.
Hal Kaplan wrote:
Kewl! Are you going to marry the car you love? If so, we need to amend
the Constitution to allow such no-sex marriages :)
Hi Hal!
City boy with no imagination, I see. No Idea about what these Texas
fellows might do, or how.
Regards,
Pete
Michael Madigan wrote:
He'd get even better milage if he just drove downhill.
Hi Michael!
He has been going downhill since even before he got it.
Regards,
Pete
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
David Crooks wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2006 1:27 AM Pete Theisen wrote:
There are always some people who are doing well, and always people
who are starving. It just depends on who you consider to be worthy of
your concern. The New Yorkers who come down here seem to hate
everyone equally.
Leland Jackson wrote:
Subside is such a permanent solution to whit is likely only a temporary
problem; perhaps staging your own death would be a better choice. You
could join back into the list as MadMax. LOL
Hi Leland!
Nah, just do a bankruptcy and blow off the judgment.
Regards,
Andy Davies wrote:
Bill, having run a small retail business I suggest that the heart of any
system should be the cash register[s] - take a look at the low end of the
various suppliers' networked ranges and check for computer connectivity
features; at the very least you want to be able to upload
Dominic Burford wrote:
Huh!! It saves one life, by claiming aother like in the process.
If neither one had been armed with guns, both would have survived. I
don't see your point.
Hi Dominic!
The criminals *will* be armed with guns. Naive to expect them not to be.
Regards,
Pete
Dominic Burford wrote:
Because the criminal will always have the gun and only the
law-abiding would turn their's in.
That is not the point you were making. You posted a link to an
article which you indicated described how a gun saved a life. The
story describes how a burglar is killed by
stalkers. I know I absolutely refuse to let my kids use it.
Hi Jim!
MySpace is tech, so [NF] is ok. I have a MySpace page myself. It
automatically lists your age under your name, but of course, anyone can
lie - often the kids do lie about their own age.
http://www.myspace.com/petetheisen
I
Leland Jackson wrote:
Hi Leland!
Don't think nymphos are necessarily criminal, however. It isn't how you
feel, it is whether or not you break the law trying to cope with your
feelings.
Regards,
Pete
The more psychologically correct term is nymphomaniac, Hallelujah.
As long as I am
Stephen the Cook wrote:
MB Software Solutions wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: MB Software Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And you were there how long afterwards? eg
Weeks! Close to a hundred or so.
But they never looked at you the same after that, did they? You were
put on the
jeff wrote:
At 12:14 PM 6/19/2006, you wrote:
http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20060615.html
Microsoft has spent five years and $5 billion NOT shipping Windows
Vista. This reflects a company deliberately built in the image of its
founder, Bill Gates -- a single-tasking, technically
Ed Leafe wrote:
It's always interesting to hear war spoken about as something
glorious, when those who have actually been in battle will tell you
that it is horrific. Yet our war-supporting media is filtering out the
disturbing images coming out of Iraq so as not to turn the public
Leland Jackson wrote:
This should be a job for the UN.
Hi Leland!
Indeed, it should. However, the UN in its 50 plus years of history has
never really done anything of lasting importance. Came close with Audrey
Hepburn's save the children campaign, but even she died trying rather
than
Stephen Russell wrote:
Is it the vendors responsibility to VALIDATE the age of the user?
Hi Stephen!
Is there any way to validate the age of a user? Looks to me that the
kids are guilty of a juvenile offense to me.
Regards,
Pete
___
Post
Dave Crozier wrote:
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/37572/
( -or- http://tinyurl.com/oq6qf )
Pete
Personally, I think that rather than the media hide these images from the
public, they should be allowed to see them in graphic detail.
Hi Dave!
Looks like they are allowing the public
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why not show the Vietnamese napalmed instead.
There isn't a link between 911 and Iraq, and whilst you know it you keep
trying to draw one...
If he says it often enough in toady's society it may become true?
Hi Bad Steve!
It
Hal Kaplan wrote:
Who calculates these numbers? Who audits them? How do we know they
are not Enron'ed?
I am serious about this. There is a lot of talk about strong economy
and assorted positive aspects, but tell the truth, have you
experienced them?
I mean like unemployment is down (or so
Michael Madigan wrote:
I have you, don't I?
Hi Michael!
It may be that what she means is any idea you come up with yourself, an
original thought - if you will, is meaningless because conservatives
are not considered capable of original thought by liberals, only
liberals can do that.
If you
Bob Calco wrote:
snip
unless you are ruling the world as
benevolent Secretary General and Dictator for Life of the New and
Improved United Nations, you'll be grumpy and negative no matter what.
Hi Bob!
Remarkable that he doesn't embrace my plan to move the UN to a remote
4-county corner of
Stephen Russell wrote:
Sounds like the voice of Cartman? http://tinyurl.com/en47h
Hi Stephen!
Cartman who?
Regards,
Pete
Stephen Russell
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
Helio W. wrote:
So everything I hear about the deterioration of work conditions in the US
over the last few decades are false? Pure propaganda?
Hi Helio!
Actually, things are getting better for some people, the richest of the
rich. About the same for everyone else for, yeah, a few decades.
Helio W. wrote:
Hi Helio!
Are you referring to the islamic expansion in the middle ages or
specifically to the Crusades?
Both.
Yeah, some advocate that the matter between the western and islamic
world isn't settled yet. But I really don't see a direct connection
between the Taleban and
Helio W. wrote:
Hi Helio!
Either explanation will do, won't they? Take your pick.
Regards,
Pete
I think Jean's explanation is more simpler. Sea food contamination is
a serious issue to this day.
On 6/13/06, petetheisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Helio W. wrote:
Serious question: what's
Helio W. wrote:
Are you accusing me of islamic terrorism? LOL
Hi Helio!
Just lust. Come to think of it . . .
By the way, you do know that a number of the 72 virgins will be 72 years
old, do you not? Bet you get only one or two real lookers, at the most.
Hardly worth killing us all for, is
Dominic Burford wrote:
But every homo I have ever seen or heard of has been hot after some kid,
often enough, too often even, me.
snip
Homosexuality and paedophilia are *not* the same. Just because some
paedophiles are homosexual, does not mean that they all are.
Hi Dominic!
If these you
Stephen the Cook wrote:
God was getting him. He must have previously told a fib, probably
it was just about sex, though.
Pretty bold coming from a Chinese medicine man.
Hi Steve!
Ha so, he who tell fib break fibula. God is get him, chop, chop.
Pete, is god a vengeful persona or
Bob Calco wrote:
snip
we tend to want instant gratification with our french fires
Hi Bob!
I tend to think of the Italian fires as more sultry, although many disagree.
Regards,
Pete
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
Helio W. wrote:
Hi Helio!
Did you get wood watching her?
Regards,
Pete
I knew Michael was into this sort of thing... LOL
PORNOGRAPHY is difficult to define, wrote Justice Potter Stewart, but
I know it when I see it.
That famously commonsensical line would seem to obviate the need for any
Hal Kaplan wrote:
You cannot successfully peddle anything unless someone buys it. The
real question here is why is the public apparently flocking to this
volume? Is it the shock value? Miss Coulter is a potty-mouthed
Hi Hal!
Really? She uses the words sh*t and p*ss?
Regards,
Pete
Michael Madigan wrote:
Hi Michael!
Predictable, broken record even.
Regards,
Pete
F*ckem
--- Bill Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People in European and Muslim countries see US policy in Iraq as a
bigger threat to world peace than Iran's nuclear programme, a survey has
shown.
The
Jean Laeremans wrote:
On 6/13/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well he may not have been vengeful lately, but he was at one point.
ROFL
btw just for arguments sake : he's omnipotent, why should such a being
change tack ?
Hi Jean!
He is God, He may do anything He wishes to
Bob Calco wrote:
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/12/D8I6VEOO4.html
- - -
As Tropical Storm Alberto threatened to strengthen into the ninth
hurricane in 22 months to affect Florida, former President Clinton
predicted Monday that Republican environmental policies will lead to
more severe
Kristyne McDaniel wrote:
hag like Ann
Coulter -- who is a mere reflection of an attractive young woman.
Hi Kris!
Hag? Too many meds lately, or not enough? I should get to hang out with
such a hag . . .
Regards,
Pete
___
Post Messages to:
Jean Laeremans wrote:
Hi Jean!
He is God, He may do anything He wishes to do. AND, He need not explain
Himself to , , , you.
I see, bit like Bush then...
Hi Jean!
No, rather Bush is a bit like Him.
Regards,
Pete
___
Post Messages to:
Hi Everybody!
Three women go down to Mexico one night, get drunk, and wake up in jail,
only to find that they are to be executed in the morning, though none of
them can remember what they did the night before.
The first one, a redhead, is strapped in the electric chair, and is
asked if she
Stephen the Cook wrote:
snip
, I have no idea what you are referring to as tranny gear.
Think of The Rocky Horror Picture Show
Hi Stephen!
Doesn't ring a bell, don't remember anything about a tranny or a
tranny gear in The Rocky Horror Picture Show.
I'm a sweet transvestite, from Trans
201 - 257 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
