Hi Everybody!
White people having civil rights?
http://www.whitecivilrights.com/name-discrimination_597.html
--
Regards,
Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
That's David Duke's website. Probably not something we want to link to.
*
I'm Surviving The Obama Depression
http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6535062
--- On Thu, 3/19/09, Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net wrote:
From: Pete Theisen
Michael Madigan wrote:
That's David Duke's website. Probably not something we want to link to.
Hi Michael!
Well, does he EVER tell the truth? Let's say he does, at least sometimes.
Does Obama EVER tell the truth? Let's say he does, at least sometimes.
Who tells the truth more often, Duke or
These aren't discretionary bonuses, they are contractual and are
therefore not dependant on public opinion
-Original Message-
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Geoff Flight
Sent: 18 March 2009 23:47
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Oh,
I took your second expression, and switched out fields with stuff in my data
so I could test and it worked just fine for me. I didn't have any group by
problem. I did, however, shorten up the expression using MOD() on the date
to get the month and I just hard-coded the year because it doesn't
Hi all,
Someone I know who is still using FPD 2.5 had some tables get damaged. Lots
of them. And when trying to open them, we always get the Not a database
file message. Back when I used to use 2.5, I remember this happening
occasionally, and I had a PRG that fixed them. But that's long gone.
John,
fixfoxrc.com should do the trick. Email me at desmond.ll...@gmail.com and I'll
send ya a copy.
Regards,
Desmond
From: john.mihalje...@gmail.com
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Not a database file in FPD 2.5
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:51:14 -0400
Hi all,
Someone
These aren't discretionary bonuses, they are contractual and are
therefore not dependant on public opinion
Precisely. This phony scandal is an attack on the free market contractual
system. AIG and these execs are just the pawns de jure used to accomplish
what is in fact a very malicious
Hi John,
you could try CMRepair from http://www.cmstory.com/ (not sure if it
works on 2.5 tables, but it might)
John J. Mihaljevic wrote:
Hi all,
Someone I know who is still using FPD 2.5 had some tables get damaged. Lots
of them. And when trying to open them, we always get the Not a
Someone I know who is still using FPD 2.5 had some tables get damaged.
Is there any reason not to upgrade to 2.6 or 2.6a? AFAIK, dFPUG
(www.dfpug.de) is still offering the downgrade offer if you have VFP 5. The
latest patches for 2.6 are available on the CompuServe forum.
--
Christof
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
These aren't discretionary bonuses, they are contractual and are
therefore not dependant on public opinion
Precisely. This phony scandal is an attack on the free market contractual
system. AIG and these execs are
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:03 PM, gil hale g...@gilhale.com wrote:
The transaction file was left on, and as suggested we are going to turn that
off diring the VFP to SQL append routines.
-
You cannot turn off the Log in SQL Server.
You might try to change the
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Sytze de Boer sy...@kiss.co.nz wrote:
Hi
I know how to do cmonth(date()) and various derivatives thereof
How do convert a number to a month ?
This is be done in a select statement where 1 field is (say 200804 or
200805)
The numbers are consistent mm,
On Mar 19, 2009, at 8:30 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
A bonus is just that, extra personal revenue for doing good work.
They failed miserably in the good work department. That failure
nullifies it IMHO.
If you take the time to read the actual contract, there were both
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com
wrote:
These aren't discretionary bonuses, they are contractual and are
therefore not dependant on public opinion
Precisely. This phony scandal is an attack on the free market
contractual
system. AIG and these
What version of VFP are you using Cathy? I doesn't work with VFP9/SP2. As
soon as you add the GROUP BY with the 2nd field, it chokes (Function
argument value, type, or count is invalid.)
Fred
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Cathy Pountney pro...@frontier2000.comwrote:
I took your second
I think AIG was laundering money to other banks with ties to Washington
politicians. We'll never know because these weasels are way too good at
squashing a story and they have the press in their back pocket.
*
I'm Surviving The Obama
I'm using VFP 9 SP2 .. didn't choke for me.
Do you have any records where the numeric field with the year/month is 0?
Maybe that is causing the problem.
Cathy
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com]
On
Behalf Of Fred Taylor
Sent:
It doesn't matter what you do as long as you're the Obamessiah
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2009/03/barack_obama_ca.html#comments
*
I'm Surviving The Obama Depression
http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6535062
Bob,
This is one time I disagree with you. My thought is that anyone excepting
Government money is subject to any rules that the Government wants to
impose. Besides the Government now owns 80% of AIG so they have the right to
ask for the names. Also since when can the government stop doing
1. The government doesn't have the right to make contracts null and void.
2. The government bailed out AIG with no shareholder vote. This to me seems
illegal.
3. There are people who are receiving bonuses that were part of the profitable
divisions of AIG and have nothing to do with its
I found this old code, not sure if it will help your problem?
***to repair hsaudit.dbf
close all
set exclusive off
set TABLEVALIDATE to 0
select 0
use hsaudit.dbf
wait Please be patient, step 1 of 2. Copying hsaudit table to temporary
table... window at 25,50 nowait
copy to hstemp with cdx
select
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com
BULL on you. The issues isn't whether we believe AIG was prudent, if they
were they wouldn't have needed a bail out. Frankly I think the healthier
thing to have done, despite the near term pain, would have been to let them
Bob,
This is one time I disagree with you. My thought is that anyone
excepting
Government money is subject to any rules that the Government wants to
impose. Besides the Government now owns 80% of AIG so they have the
right to
ask for the names. Also since when can the government stop doing
John J. Mihaljevic wrote:
Hi all,
Someone I know who is still using FPD 2.5 had some tables get damaged. Lots
of them. And when trying to open them, we always get the Not a database
file message. Back when I used to use 2.5, I remember this happening
occasionally, and I had a PRG that fixed
We just found that out this morning - heh-heh... The initial load is what took
longest. All appends and edits from now on are just data squirts, so no big
deal.
Thanks, again, to my colleagues that helped clarify my thinking and direction
in hatching out a solution. The processes are
There's a topic about DBF corruption on fox.wikis.com, with some sample
fixing code, IIRC.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbou...@fastmail.fm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free
#---
On February 22, 2005, Barack Obama, a U.S. Senator at the time, placed a
trade on a tiny biotechnology company out of Oregon. The biotech
company's name is AVI Biopharma.
8 months after Obama bought the stock, the company was awarded a $28
million contract from the federal
Oh my gawd... I need a drink Michael agrees with me...
OK off out for an Effes or two
Adam.
-Original Message-
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent: 19 March 2009 15:54
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Oh, now I get
Our Q/C department is testing our latest version of software, and for some
reason, even though he is installing to a folder off of the root, he's
getting foxuser.* files created on the user's desktop. We've got the
following in our config.fpw, and it's included in the exe:
TITLE=OurCompany, Inc.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Bob Calco bobca...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
My larger point is that the bailouts themselves were wrong, wrong, wrong.
The urgency to save these a$$holes was created to put the politicians in
this position of dictatorial authority, not to save the Republic or
Do you have any VFP applications running as part of the Installer?
-Original Message-
From: MB Software Solutions General Account
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 3:08 PM
Our Q/C department is testing our latest version of software, and for some
reason, even though he is installing to a
Leaving aside why it's creating a resource file, I'm guessing that the shortcut
to your EXE is on the desktop and the user doesn't have write access to the
folder the EXE lives in or the user does not have write access to the Start In
location?
Richard Kaye
Our Q/C department is testing our
On Thu, March 19, 2009 3:05 pm, Tracy Pearson wrote:
Do you have any VFP applications running as part of the Installer?
Well, they build the Client (workstation) install first, then package that
into the Server build. Client checks for the existence of a newer
NInstall.exe (client build name)
Ok...it must be one of those days. I can't see the section in IS2K9 where
I'm able to say this file should be removed on uninstall. Q/C is
showing me how some files get left behind on uninstall. (Darn they're
picky!)
How do I label a file as delete this sucker when uninstalling app ??
tia,
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:07:58 -0400 (EDT), MB Software Solutions General
Account mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
Our Q/C department is testing our latest version of software, and for some
reason, even though he is installing to a folder off of the root, he's
getting foxuser.*
MB Software Solutions General Account wrote:
Our Q/C department is testing our latest version of software, and for some
reason, even though he is installing to a folder off of the root, he's
getting foxuser.* files created on the user's desktop. We've got the
following in our config.fpw, and
On Thu, March 19, 2009 3:33 pm, Gianni Turri wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:07:58 -0400 (EDT), MB Software Solutions General
Account mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
Our Q/C department is testing our latest version of software, and for
some reason, even though he is
If there is a VFP EXE started from the installer process, the current
working folder might be the user desktop, or c:\windows\system32, which may
create the foxuser table on the desktop since write permissions are varied
due to policies set on the system.
-Original Message-
From: MB
Nope a single test record (200811). That was on my one system with the
early release of SP2 on it. I'll have to try it on another system that has
the real SP2 on it, when I get a chance.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Cathy Pountney pro...@frontier2000.comwrote:
I'm using VFP 9 SP2 ..
By the way, what is the ALLOWEXTERNAL function in your fpw file ?
Sytze
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Tracy Pearson tr...@powerchurch.comwrote:
If there is a VFP EXE started from the installer process, the current
working folder might be the user desktop, or c:\windows\system32, which
Fred, between you and Cathy you leave me for dead with your vfp knowledge,
so I'm watching your discussion with interest.
Sytze
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Fred Taylor fbtay...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope a single test record (200811). That was on my one system with the
early release of SP2
It allows you to override the config file built into the EXE.
Richard Kaye
-
This message has been checked for viruses before sending.
-
-Original Message-
From:
Mine is the default OFF.
When ON, it allows for the built in FPW to be over ruled.
-Original Message-
From: Sytze de Boer
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 4:08 PM
By the way, what is the ALLOWEXTERNAL function in your fpw file ?
Sytze
___
Post
On Thu, March 19, 2009 3:36 pm, Vince Teachout wrote:
MB Software Solutions General Account wrote:
Our Q/C department is testing our latest version of software, and for
some reason, even though he is installing to a folder off of the root,
he's getting foxuser.* files created on the user's
Thanks for that
I could find no reference in the VFP help file for this
Sytze
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Tracy Pearson tr...@powerchurch.comwrote:
Mine is the default OFF.
When ON, it allows for the built in FPW to be over ruled.
-Original Message-
From: Sytze de Boer
Sent:
On Thu, March 19, 2009 4:07 pm, Sytze de Boer wrote:
By the way, what is the ALLOWEXTERNAL function in your fpw file ?
Sytze
Good tip from Rick Schummer about something the Fox team put into one of
the more recent versions of VFP, allowing you to use a config.fpw that
exists OUTSIDE of your
Hi Mike
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:49:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: MB Software Solutions General Account
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Subject: Re: VFP9SP1 Foxuser.* files created on desktop
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Message-ID:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:49:46 -0400 (EDT), MB Software Solutions General
Account mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
On Thu, March 19, 2009 3:33 pm, Gianni Turri wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:07:58 -0400 (EDT), MB Software Solutions General
Account
It allows you to override the config file built into the EXE.
Sort of true and I think you know this, but more accurately (for Sytze) it
allows you to override specific options you have in the external Config.FPW.
Anything in the internal config are still in effect unless you override them
by
Thanks for everyones suggestions!
I wound up using hdclone
http://www.miray.de/products/sat.hdclone.html
It worked like a charm without any hitches. You just create a bootable CD,
reboot, and select the source and target. I used the free edition.
--- On Mon, 3/16/09, Alan Bourke
Actually it's the other way around, all files that were installed by the
installer should get uninstalled unless they're marked as Permanent or
Shared. In InstallShield Express 2009, go to the Files pane, right click on
a file in the lower right quadrant, choose Properties, select the Advanced
It happens every time a company declares Chapter 11. All contracts are null
and void and the judge decides what stays and what goes.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com
To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 11:53 AM
Subject:
Hey Rick,
Isn't it possible Windows Installer is determining the file version is
different from what was installed and not uninstalling it?
Rick
White Light Computing, Inc.
www.whitelightcomputing.com
www.swfox.net
www.rickschummer.com
-Original Message-
From:
And that's what they should have done, let it go bankrupt.
*
--- On Thu, 3/19/09, Nicholas Geti ng...@optonline.net wrote:
From: Nicholas Geti ng...@optonline.net
Subject: Re: [OT] Oh, now I get it
To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com
Does anyone know how to overcome this Blat problem
The SMTP server response was - 530 5.7.1 Relaying not permitted:
rosa...@kiwicamping.co.nz
--
Regards
Sytze de Boer
Kiss Systems
Hamilton, NZ
Ph: 64-7-8391670, Mob:021 937611,
www.kiss.co.nz
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
Rick Borup wrote:
Actually it's the other way around, all files that were installed by the
installer should get uninstalled unless they're marked as Permanent or
Shared. In InstallShield Express 2009, go to the Files pane, right click on
a file in the lower right quadrant, choose Properties,
Mike yearwood wrote:
You need to embed a config.fpw in the exe with the RESOURCE=OFF line
at least. It does not work as the first line of the first .prg ever.
Hi Mike,
It is included in the EXE. So if it doesn't work as the first line of
the PRG, where should it go? If anywhere, I thought
You may be thinking of the Windows Installer file versioning rules, which
are used to determine whether or not a file is overwritten during
installation of a product or product update. In the case of versioned files
such as an EXE, if the version number of the existing file is higher than
the
Oh yes...we're keeping the database files...we just wanted to remove the
program (EXE). I'd like to keep the runtimes, but it appears they're
set to be removed already too.
I haven't cracked open the VFP9 runtimes merge module to look, but my guess
is that the runtime file components are
Sytze de Boer wrote:
Does anyone know how to overcome this Blat problem
The SMTP server response was - 530 5.7.1 Relaying not permitted:
rosa...@kiwicamping.co.nz
Is the SMTP server your ISP? A server you control? If the former, you probably
need
to send via secure smtp (port 465). If the
61 matches
Mail list logo
