[no subject]

2018-05-06 Thread Charles Hart Enzer, M.D.
(sorry, sent too sone) Starting Friday, Desktop has No Internet connection with ethernet to router OS: WIN 64bit Home Edition Network Trouble Shooter: No DNS server Diagnosis of Ethernet: Networking Reset ​Diagnosis of WiFi Card: ​ Networking Reset ​Applied fix and rebooted. I ran

Joe Yoder's Data Problem (was no subject)

2014-05-29 Thread mbsoftwaresolutions
On 2014-05-28 21:12, Joe Yoder wrote: I am an occasional VFP programmer who has never had enough experience with the GUI to learn the proper way to organize a project to let the various components communicate with each other. I need to collect descriptions of a variable number of IP addresses

[no subject]

2014-05-28 Thread Joe Yoder
I am an occasional VFP programmer who has never had enough experience with the GUI to learn the proper way to organize a project to let the various components communicate with each other. I need to collect descriptions of a variable number of IP addresses stored in a 2 column array. The first

Re: Using wrong subject: Southwest Fox for political discussions

2013-06-28 Thread Gene Wirchenko
Fox as the subject. I hope this practice stops. Unfortunately, this happens because the people posting them are in such a hurry to make their ultra-important arguments that they can't be bothered to think about anyone else. Quite. On a related note, the monthly statistics

Using wrong subject: Southwest Fox for political discussions

2013-06-27 Thread Wes Wilson
I am very interested in both politics and the success of Southwest Fox, however, I have opened the emails several times just to find political discussions with Southwest Fox as the subject. I hope this practice stops.   Wes Wilson, President ERW Custom Programming, Inc. Crescent Lake Plaza

Re: Using wrong subject: Southwest Fox for political discussions

2013-06-27 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jun 28, 2013, at 2:35 AM, Wes Wilson erwweswil...@yahoo.com wrote: I am very interested in both politics and the success of Southwest Fox, however, I have opened the emails several times just to find political discussions with Southwest Fox as the subject. I hope this practice stops

RE: Using wrong subject: Southwest Fox for political discussions

2013-06-27 Thread Virgil Bierschwale
, June 27, 2013 10:48 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: Using wrong subject: Southwest Fox for political discussions On Jun 28, 2013, at 2:35 AM, Wes Wilson erwweswil...@yahoo.com wrote: I am very interested in both politics and the success of Southwest Fox, however, I have opened the emails

[no subject]

2010-08-19 Thread Jack Skelley
Good Afternoon All: I'm trying to drag a file out of Windows Explorer (Win XP Pro) and drop the file in a listbox and have the filename be added as an item. When I use the getfile() construct I have zero issue. So I thought I could speed the process up by having the explorer open and drag and

Re: [NF] Print Servers, was What do I need? (other than a better 'Subject')

2010-06-01 Thread Ken Kixmoeller f/h
Ted Roche wrote: Your comment got me curious, and I went to look it up. This looks like a decent, standardized print server: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833156025 I would expect stupid WinPrinters like the HP 1012 to be a problem. Yeah, both printers are HP ---

Re: [NF] Print Servers, was What do I need? (other than a better 'Subject')

2010-06-01 Thread Ted Roche
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Ken Kixmoeller f/h foxh...@information-architecture.com wrote: Yeah, both printers are HP --- a LaserJet 1020 (suspiciously close to your 1012 reference, and it doesn't work with my wife's new MacBook) and a D1500 color inkjet (which does have a Mac driver). A

Re: [NF] Print Servers, was What do I need? (other than a better 'Subject')

2010-06-01 Thread Ken Kixmoeller f/h
Ted Roche wrote: listed as Host based printing - iow, the computer does all the work, No way would I have known what that meant. cartridges last for what seems to be about 20 prints). Caveat emptor! Yeah --- looks like I have a have a big caveat stuck right in my left emptor. g I had a

[NF] Print Servers, was What do I need? (other than a better 'Subject')

2010-05-31 Thread Ken Kixmoeller f/h
Ted Roche wrote: On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Joel N. Fischoff petru...@rcn.com wrote: I'm a big fan of print servers for the printers, to remove the requirement that the associated computer be running in order to print. Oh, I'm glad you brought that up! I had just been researching these

Re: [NF] Print Servers, was What do I need? (other than a better 'Subject')

2010-05-31 Thread Ted Roche
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Ken Kixmoeller f/h foxh...@information-architecture.com wrote: I had just been researching these a couple of weeks ago. I gave up (or procrastinated really) when I found out that printers were only compatible with certain print server models. Many of the

Re: [NF] Print Servers, was What do I need? (other than a better 'Subject')

2010-05-31 Thread Ted Roche
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Ken Kixmoeller f/h foxh...@information-architecture.com wrote: I had just been researching these a couple of weeks ago. I gave up (or procrastinated really) when I found out that printers were only compatible with certain print server models. Many of the

[no subject]

2010-02-22 Thread Jihan Haidar
I am just wondering if someone know this:    If you have a domain and IP address of a Website, how can you find out who is the hosting company?   A friend has been hosting a personal web site for 10 years and she forgot who is hosting it for her. here the website and  IP address:

Re: [NF] What personal firewall software are your customers running? (edited subject)

2010-01-06 Thread Malcolm Greene
Edit: Forgot to include my list of firewalls we've seen so far. Included following my signature. Wondering what brands of personal firewall software you've come across at your customer sites. Background: We're building an application that is implemented as a local webserver using port 8000 or

Re: [NF] Advanced text editor widget for browsers (was No subject)

2009-12-27 Thread Malcolm Greene
Paul, Can someone recommend a cross browser widget and/or technique that would allow users to work with large blocks of text in a browser? By work with text, I mean edit, search, and replace text. Ideally we're looking for something like a jquery-like DHTML component - not a Flash or RIA

[no subject]

2009-12-24 Thread Malcolm Greene
Can someone recommend a cross brower widget and/or technique that would allow users to work with large blocks of text in a browser? By work with text, I mean edit, search, and replace text. Ideally we're looking for something like a jquery-like DHTML component - not a Flash or RIA component (which

[NF] Advanced text editor widget for browsers (was No subject)

2009-12-24 Thread Malcolm Greene
Can someone recommend a cross browser widget and/or technique that would allow users to work with large blocks of text in a browser? By work with text, I mean edit, search, and replace text. Ideally we're looking for something like a jquery-like DHTML component - not a Flash or RIA component

Re: [NF] Advanced text editor widget for browsers (was No subject)

2009-12-24 Thread Paul McNett
Malcolm Greene wrote: Can someone recommend a cross browser widget and/or technique that would allow users to work with large blocks of text in a browser? By work with text, I mean edit, search, and replace text. Ideally we're looking for something like a jquery-like DHTML component - not a

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-14 Thread Stephen Russell
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:56 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: NoNFW.  I'd rather change careers, because at 70 hrs/week (even maybe 60 iirc), I'm making as much money by bagging groceries locally. F*ck that if that's the case.

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-14 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
Stephen Russell wrote: On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:56 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: NoNFW. I'd rather change careers, because at 70 hrs/week (even maybe 60 iirc), I'm making as much money by bagging groceries locally. F*ck that if

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-13 Thread Charlie Coleman
At 12:08 PM 10/9/2009 -0400, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: Stephen Russell wrote: I have worked with these imports for this past decade. Most have an incredible work ethic, unlike most Americans. Here we go again with that old broken record: Americans are lazy, foreigners work

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-13 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
Charlie Coleman wrote: But, overall, it's the usual story - the short-term focus of most US businesses ends up causing long-term problems. Bingo. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance:

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-13 Thread Michael Madigan
Mot only that, but the Indian Restaurants are driving out the Italian Restaurants. --- On Tue, 10/13/09, MB Software Solutions, LLC mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: From: MB Software Solutions, LLC mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com Subject: Re: [NF] Why

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-13 Thread Stephen Russell
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Charlie Coleman colem...@acm.org wrote: But for entertainment value it is almost laughable to watch him croon about But anyway, as one of the non-lazy American (U.S.) developers - someone who actually evaluates a technology and lets the customer know all the

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-13 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
Stephen Russell wrote: snipped They didn't understand how in the USA everyone took the weekend off and restarted on Monday. They would continue to work till the current task was completed if it meant late on Fri. and then coming in on Sat they did it. snipped Do you think we should be more

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-13 Thread Stephen Russell
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:04 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: Stephen Russell wrote: snipped They didn't understand how in the USA everyone took the weekend off and restarted on Monday.  They would continue to work till the current task was

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-13 Thread Pete Theisen
MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: Stephen Russell wrote: snipped They didn't understand how in the USA everyone took the weekend off and restarted on Monday. They would continue to work till the current task was completed if it meant late on Fri. and then coming in on Sat they did it.

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-13 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
Stephen Russell wrote: On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:04 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: Stephen Russell wrote: snipped They didn't understand how in the USA everyone took the weekend off and restarted on Monday. They would continue to work till

Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-12 Thread Stephen Russell
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: 6% --- What do you say to the company in Detroit that cannot find anyone talented enough for the position who has not moved out of the Detroit area nor who would consider moving to Detroit? -- Stephen

Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-12 Thread Michael Madigan
Detroit is loaded with talent. LOL --- On Mon, 10/12/09, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote: From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic) To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date

Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-11 Thread Michael Madigan
I worked for a company where they paid this Indian girl crap yet she had to stay there for the VISA. End all foreign work VISAs as long as we have 10% unemployment Pete's not far off from the truth, though, Steve.  The Indians do more for less, so why shouldn't the American IT worker? 

Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-11 Thread Stephen Russell
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: I worked for a company where they paid this Indian girl crap yet she had to stay there for the VISA. End all foreign work VISAs as long as we have 10% unemployment -- For grins what is the acceptable

Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-11 Thread Michael Madigan
6% --- On Sun, 10/11/09, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote: From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic) To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Sunday, October 11, 2009, 6:27 PM

Personal: (Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to ...)

2009-10-10 Thread Malcolm Greene
Pete, I don't know, but somehow, I think eating her *cooking* never entered his mind. Others on this list may want to shoot me for saying this, but I've come to really enjoy your comments - you add a fun bit of irrelevance to this list. Profox is definitely an eclectic community but this is

Re: Personal: (Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to ...)

2009-10-10 Thread Pete Theisen
Malcolm Greene wrote: Pete, I don't know, but somehow, I think eating her *cooking* never entered his mind. Others on this list may want to shoot me for saying this, but I've come to really enjoy your comments - you add a fun bit of irrelevance to this list. Profox is definitely an

[NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-09 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/career/?p=1299tag=nl.e101 H-1B visa mills (think: “puppy mills” with immigrant workers instead of dogs) that lure workers to the United States, and then hold the requirement of employment over their heads to force them to work for sub-par wages and often in

Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws

2009-10-09 Thread Ed Leafe
On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:36 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: Oh nooo...this can't happenall of this foreign labor we really really need because there's not enough natives to fill the jobs...it has NOTHING to do with sub-par wages...bullsh!t Sub-par? You forget that the

Re: [OT] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws

2009-10-09 Thread Stephen Russell
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote: On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:36 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: Oh nooo...this can't happenall of this foreign labor we really really need because there's not enough natives to fill the jobs...it has NOTHING to do with sub-par

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-09 Thread Stephen Russell
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:36 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/career/?p=1299tag=nl.e101 H-1B visa mills (think: “puppy mills” with immigrant workers instead of dogs) that lure workers to the United States, and

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-09 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
Stephen Russell wrote: Maybe they are really smart as well, and you can pay them like shit. Looks like we have a winner! At least they are not in your line of business because nobody would focus on xBase today, there is no long term viability for a revenue stream as compared to java,

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-09 Thread Stephen Russell
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:21 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: Stephen Russell wrote: Maybe they are really smart as well, and you can pay them like shit. Looks like we have a winner! At least they are not in your line of business because nobody

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-09 Thread Pete Theisen
Stephen Russell wrote: I have worked with these imports for this past decade. Most have an incredible work ethic, unlike most Americans. You read the xBase and you focus on that only. You have to see the bigger picture. Just like blue collar workers today have a hard time making a

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-09 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
Stephen Russell wrote: I have worked with these imports for this past decade. Most have an incredible work ethic, unlike most Americans. Here we go again with that old broken record: Americans are lazy, foreigners work harder. barf You read the xBase and you focus on that only. You

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-09 Thread Stephen Russell
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net wrote: But work ethic nowadays isn't what is selling them. It is the low wages. The bosses aren't satisfied with being millionaires they want to be billionaires and expect everyone else to make it happen. -- If

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-09 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
Stephen Russell wrote: On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net wrote: But work ethic nowadays isn't what is selling them. It is the low wages. The bosses aren't satisfied with being millionaires they want to be billionaires and expect everyone else to make it

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-09 Thread Pete Theisen
Stephen Russell wrote: On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net wrote: But work ethic nowadays isn't what is selling them. It is the low wages. The bosses aren't satisfied with being millionaires they want to be billionaires and expect everyone else to make it

RE: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-09 Thread Allen
been for a while. We know otherwise but the damage is done. Al -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC Sent: 09 October 2009 18:09 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] Why programmers

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-09 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
Allen wrote: Yes people start to moan when its them. Never mind all the little shops gone because the chosen way was wallmart for shopping. People demand cheaper goods so it comes from abroad and when it's too late, moan about jobs going. VFP jobs is another reason though, everyone thinks it's

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-09 Thread Stephen Russell
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:13 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: Stephen Russell wrote: On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net wrote: But work ethic nowadays isn't what is selling them. It is the low wages. The

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-09 Thread Pete Theisen
Stephen Russell wrote: btw -- I'm dating this super hot Indian chick now. She's a lawyer though...not a developer. So I'm certainly not being racist or ignorant. ;-) Great for you. Can you eat her cooking yet? Or are you not at that stage in a relationship yet? Hi Steve, I don't

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-09 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
Stephen Russell wrote: Great for you. Can you eat her cooking yet? Or are you not at that stage in a relationship yet? Not there yet. She's very Americanized though...lived here her whole life so I'm not worried. ;-) -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief

Re: [NF] Why programmers are not subject to protective labor laws (from TechRepublic)

2009-10-09 Thread Stephen Russell
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:41 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: Stephen Russell wrote: Great for you.  Can you eat her cooking yet?  Or are you not at that stage in a relationship yet? Not there yet.  She's very Americanized though...lived here

[no subject]

2009-04-04 Thread Ken Kirkpatrick
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this

Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list.

2009-03-11 Thread Stephen Russell
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:36 PM, KAM.covad a_gmail_nos...@kenmcginnis.com wrote: I agree with this. I am definitely moving toward Python and PostgreSQL. I went to the Baypiggies meeting last month (local python user meeting) I know that M$ will eventually screw all of us in order to force us

Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list.

2009-03-10 Thread KAM.covad
of this monopoly proprietary box. - Original Message - From: Michael Madigan To: ProFox Email List Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:29 PM Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list. It's always the lurkers that complain the most. If they don't like the content, then contribute

Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list.

2009-03-10 Thread Sytze de Boer
in order to force us to use .Net or whatever garbage they dream up next and I need to find a way out of this monopoly proprietary box. - Original Message - From: Michael Madigan To: ProFox Email List Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:29 PM Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list

RE: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list.

2009-03-10 Thread John Weller
Getting a bit personal! No flame wars please. John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 This is the kind of nonsense that people are fed up with, and destroying this wonderful tool (Profox) Your statement has just placed all .Net developers in the garbage category. For as long as you make

Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list.

2009-03-10 Thread Ed Leafe
On Mar 10, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Sytze de Boer wrote: This is the kind of nonsense that people are fed up with, and destroying this wonderful tool (Profox) Your statement has just placed all .Net developers in the garbage category. For as long as you make this kind of arrogant contribution, I

Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list.

2009-03-10 Thread Jean Laeremans
Just wondering if OT,NF,linux list, dabo list is such a difficult concept to understand. A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list:

Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list.

2009-03-09 Thread Jeff Johnson
David Boatright wrote: And your contribution has been... ? To Foxpro? I continue to use it every day, unlike you. You seem to maintain this list just so you can shit all over Foxpro and Microsoft just to promote your new toy. Wow! Unbelievable! I owe a lot of my success to Ed

Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list.

2009-03-09 Thread Michael Madigan
It's always the lurkers that complain the most. If they don't like the content, then contribute, otherwise keep lurking. --- On Mon, 3/9/09, Jeff Johnson j...@san-dc.com wrote: From: Jeff Johnson j...@san-dc.com Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list. To: profox@leafe.com Date

Subject: Re: Purpose of the list.

2009-03-08 Thread David Boatright
And your contribution has been... ? To Foxpro? I continue to use it every day, unlike you. You seem to maintain this list just so you can shit all over Foxpro and Microsoft just to promote your new toy. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list.

2009-03-08 Thread Ken Kixmoeller/fh
On Mar 8, 2009, at 7:00 PM, David Boatright wrote: You seem to maintain this list just so you can shit all over Foxpro and Microsoft just to promote your new toy. No good deed goes unpunished. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription

Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list.

2009-03-08 Thread Sytze de Boer
Mr Boatright Yes, the MS bashing has annoyed me at times Yes, there's been the odd, tongue in cheek Dabo reference. If these people are guilty, they have just been completely exonerated by your comment. When you pronounce people guilty, be very careful you don't committ a greater sin !! Sytze

Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list.

2009-03-08 Thread Michael Madigan
Claire Booth Luce said it and she was right. --- On Sun, 3/8/09, Ken Kixmoeller/fh foxh...@information-architecture.com wrote: From: Ken Kixmoeller/fh foxh...@information-architecture.com Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list. To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Sunday, March

Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list.

2009-03-08 Thread MB Software Solutions General Account
David Boatright wrote: And your contribution has been... ? To Foxpro? I continue to use it every day, unlike you. You seem to maintain this list just so you can shit all over Foxpro and Microsoft just to promote your new toy. -1 I absolutely disagree. While he might promote Dabo, I

Re: Subject: Re: Purpose of the list.

2009-03-08 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
David Boatright wrote: And your contribution has been... ? To Foxpro? I continue to use it every day, unlike you. You seem to maintain this list just so you can shit all over Foxpro and Microsoft just to promote your new toy. I completely agree with you. Would you

[no subject]

2008-12-05 Thread Kenneth Kixmoeller
check out www.buycheapsoftware.com i get lots of software from them. reliable, fast shipping, great pricing Thanks Gil ( Michael) - - - - Gee, at $153 (with shipping) it still seems higher than I was expecting for an officially obsolete product. FWIW, NewEgg has it cheaper, $139. I

Subject: Q on how MS did something

2008-10-14 Thread David Boatright
From: David Smith Subject: Q on how MS did something The more I thought about it, the more it bugged me that Uncle Steve and co. could so blatantly intrude upon and otherwise crush all my local browser settings at their whim. For what it's worth, my XP SP2 installation under VirualBox in Ubuntu

RE: Subject: Q on how MS did something

2008-10-14 Thread Allen
Well sort of. I think it put it in a separate tab though Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Boatright Firefox does exactly the same thing. the first you load the browser after a new version becomes available it hijacks your

[no subject]

2008-09-08 Thread MANUEL DELCLÓS GARRIDO
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this

[no subject]

2008-09-06 Thread Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh
maybe you are just repeating what you heard from the radio, and yer not really using that word , personally ? That is what they call themselves. I agree that advocating anarchy as a social convention is idiotic. Who wants to live in a society with no order? The fact that they were organized

Re: empty subject

2008-09-06 Thread Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh
My apologies to the list for having stripped out the subject line. I guess anarchy took over my brain. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http

Re: [OT Test - revised subject label filter

2008-05-14 Thread Ed Leafe
On May 13, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: OK, I turned on logging to see if that helps identify what's going on... That helped... one more try now... -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance:

Re: [OT Test - revised subject label filter

2008-05-14 Thread Ed Leafe
On May 14, 2008, at 7:59 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: OK, I turned on logging to see if that helps identify what's going on... That helped... one more try now... OK, I lied. *Two* more tries! -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to:

[OT Test - revised subject label filter

2008-05-13 Thread Ed Leafe
Test to see if changes to the script that filters OT messages work. If they do, this message should be filtered out of the tech list. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance:

[OT Test - revised subject label filter

2008-05-13 Thread Ed Leafe
On May 13, 2008, at 5:54 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: Test to see if changes to the script that filters OT messages work. If they do, this message should be filtered out of the tech list. G... trying again... -- Ed Leafe ___ Post

Re: [OT Test - revised subject label filter

2008-05-13 Thread Ted Roche
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Test to see if changes to the script that filters OT messages work. If they do, this message should be filtered out of the tech list. Even if you leave off the closing square bracket? -- Ted Roche Ted Roche

Re: [OT Test - revised subject label filter

2008-05-13 Thread Ed Leafe
On May 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Ted Roche wrote: Test to see if changes to the script that filters OT messages work. If they do, this message should be filtered out of the tech list. Even if you leave off the closing square bracket? Yeah... that was the point of the change.

Re: [OT Test - revised subject label filter

2008-05-13 Thread Ed Leafe
On May 13, 2008, at 6:50 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: Even if you leave off the closing square bracket? Yeah... that was the point of the change. OK, I turned on logging to see if that helps identify what's going on... -- Ed Leafe ___

[no subject]

2008-04-20 Thread Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh
There are whole churches who maintain that the KJV is the only correct translation. People like what is familiar. THE KJV is a pretty lousy version of the bible, if your main criterion is to come as close as possible to the original texts. KJV was based mostly on the Latin Vulgate. This

[no subject]

2008-04-01 Thread Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh
Bad power supply? Does it boot without the drives? Justin Doesn't appear to be bad, though that is what I was wondering, too. Yes, it boots (or tries to) without the drives. They are significantly bigger drives - do they draw more power? Is that what is causing the problem? John

[ADMIN] Changing the subject is ok when the thread changes course

2008-03-19 Thread MB Software Solutions General Account
Cathy Pountney wrote: So what's the rule about replying to a post, like this one, that starts to stray off the original topic. If it qualifies for OT or NF now .. should I change the subject line when I reply? Yes ma'am...that is correct. And these are all unwritten rules, afaik. Like

[no subject]

2008-03-10 Thread diagdad
] To: profox@leafe.com Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 6:26 AM Subject: Re: Change Fox Pro application Icon On Mar 7, 2008, at 7:29 PM, John Harvey wrote: _screen.icon='c:\myfolder\myfile.ico' The executable has a Fox Pro Icon. How do I change it to a different icon? For the executable, you

[no subject]

2008-02-21 Thread Михаил Нинбург
help --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

[no subject]

2008-02-01 Thread Михаил Нинбург
--- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This

[no subject]

2008-01-23 Thread dimitris vafiadis
PLEASE STOP SENDING E_MAILS TO ME THANK YOU [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list:

Subject: [NF] Anyone using MS Fingerprint Reader?

2008-01-04 Thread David Boatright
Malcolm Greene Anyone using the MS Fingerprint Reader and have feedback to share? Pros/cons, general opinion? We used it for clockinging in and out until the machine it was attached too died. It sucked at first when it was contected to timeclock software we bought. Lucky enough the driver had

Re: Subject: [NF] Anyone using MS Fingerprint Reader?

2008-01-04 Thread Michael Oke, II
The driver from MS has an example in FoxPro? I have one sitting on my desk for use with our timeclock, that I have to finish writing, to replace the existing one because the employees can't seem to hang on to their cards and the software that comes with the existing, frankly, sucks. ::michael

Subject: RE: Some thoughts

2007-10-04 Thread David Boatright
Thanks Dave, Ed and John Don't have much time so this will be disjointed. The .exes and temp files are local. The largest file has maybe 1000 records the next largest has maybe a couple of hundred and the rest less than 10. The largest file has three indexes including deleted() which I am

[no subject]

2007-09-26 Thread Michael Hawksworth
This is more general than just specify a one off printer but if you need to keep informed about TCO and new releases try signing up for the TCPglobal newsletter. Regards Michael Hawksworth --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/related multipart/alternative

[no subject]

2007-03-07 Thread Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh
…get a licensed realtor in your area to do a CMA (comparitive market analysis) on your property. spewing out coffee Gee, Virgil, you buy that load of crap? A licensed Realtor is just a member of an association. They have pathetic professional training and absurd ongoing education

FoxTalk publisher subject of Gripe Line

2007-02-06 Thread Ed Leafe
Hey, it looks like the Fox community isn't the only one being screwed by these lowlifes: http://weblog.infoworld.com/gripeline/archives/2007/02/ invoices_design.html?NLC-GRIPEcgd=2007-02-06 ( -or- http://tinyurl.com/3xddet ) -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com

[NF] Edit subject header in Thunderbird

2006-12-06 Thread Vince Teachout
Does anyone know if it's possible to edit subject headers for RECEIVED e-mails in T-bird? I could do this in Eudora, and even Outlook supports it, but I can't seem to be able to do it in T-bird. It comes in really handy with a few clients who never put a subject in their e-mails. Thanks

Re: [NF] Edit subject header in Thunderbird

2006-12-06 Thread Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
Vince Teachout wrote: Does anyone know if it's possible to edit subject headers for RECEIVED e-mails in T-bird? I could do this in Eudora, and even Outlook supports it, but I can't seem to be able to do it in T-bird. It comes in really handy with a few clients who never put a subject

(no subject)

2006-07-05 Thread Andy Davies
Has anyone heard how Fox will handle UAC in Vista? http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=5140348 http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=5140352 Andrew Davies  MBCS CITP   - AndyD    8-)# ** This email and any files transmitted with