Re: [NF] Chrome vs Firefox

In general you can assume that Firefox will be doing less pimping of your personal browsing habits to third parties on its default settings. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, at 10:26 PM, Charles Hart Enzer, M.D. wrote: > What are the advantages of

Re: [NF] Chrome vs Firefox

Thank you, Alan​ *​CharlesCharles Hart Enzer, M.D., FAACAPVolunteer Associate Professor of PsychiatryUniversity of Cincinnati Medical CenterWebSite:http://TinyURL.com/EnzerMD * *If You See What Needs To Be Repaired And How to Repair It,Then You Have Found a

Re: [NF] Chrome vs Firefox

I use both. I have a chromebook, which I absolutely love! I remote into my development computer and do everything "locally" where ever I am. I use the Google calendar in my applications. I use Google Hangouts for messging with my wife and with some customers. I don't use Gmail though. I do,

Re: [NF] Chrome vs Firefox

Thank you, Jeff. *​Charles* *​Charles Hart Enzer, M.D., FAACAPVolunteer Associate Professor of PsychiatryUniversity of Cincinnati Medical CenterWebSite:http://TinyURL.com/EnzerMD * *If You See What Needs To Be Repaired And How to Repair It,Then You Have

Re: [NF] Chrome weird in W8.1

Does this help https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/2762879?hl=en On Sat, Jun 7, 2014, at 06:43 AM, Lew Schwartz wrote: I bit the bullet and I'm now in the process of xferring my work to my new 8.1 laptop. Things are ok (not great), but Chrome isn't playing well. It grabs the entire

Re: [NF] Chrome weird in W8.1

I have not had any issue with Chrome in 8 or 8.1 in a year. On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm wrote: Does this help https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/2762879?hl=en On Sat, Jun 7, 2014, at 06:43 AM, Lew Schwartz wrote: I bit the bullet and I'm

Re: [NF] Chrome weird in W8.1

I guess that's it, but mine crashed so badly that it's stuck in this incompatible mode. -Lew Schwartz On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm wrote: Does this help https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/2762879?hl=en On Sat, Jun 7, 2014, at 06:43 AM, Lew

RE: [NF] Chrome weird in W8.1

Lew, When I have that kind of problem with a browser, I download and install a new copy. Just had to do that when the new FireFox 29.0 got stuck in full-screen mode. Dan Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 21:12:39 -0400 Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome weird in W8.1 From: lew1...@gmail.com To: profoxt

RE: [NF] Chrome weird in W8.1

a new copy. Just had to do that when the new FireFox 29.0 got stuck in full-screen mode. Dan Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 21:12:39 -0400 Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome weird in W8.1 From: lew1...@gmail.com To: profoxt...@leafe.com I guess that's it, but mine crashed so badly that it's stuck

RE: [NF] Chrome to drop XP in about 18 months.

from a world wide perspective. Regards Rodney -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 12:45 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome to drop XP in about 18 months. On Wed, Oct 16

Re: [NF] Chrome to drop XP in about 18 months.

On 16 October 2013 16:39, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote: http://feedly.com/k/17tG3mr That's an odd decision, considering XP has a large market share. (and probably still will have in 18 months) Maybe they're going to move all the XP users onto Chromebooks... -- Paul

Re: [NF] Chrome to drop XP in about 18 months.

Since W8 has come out XP drops from 15% of share to 12 and in 18 months I believe that most of that old stuff will fail and be replaced with a current one. Second thing is that Chrome users are more apt to have current hardware, right? On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Paul Hill

Re: [NF] Chrome to drop XP in about 18 months.

Since W8 has come out XP drops from 15% of share to 12 and in 18 months I believe that most of that old stuff will fail and be replaced with a current one. The article says that XP has over 30% of OS market share. Ken Dibble www.stic-cil.org

Re: [NF] Chrome to drop XP in about 18 months.

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Ken Dibble krdib...@stny.rr.com wrote: Since W8 has come out XP drops from 15% of share to 12 and in 18 months I believe that most of that old stuff will fail and be replaced with a current one. The article says that XP has over 30% of OS market share.

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

It was a joke, Confucius really didn't say it - Original Message - From: Vincent Teachout tea...@taconic.net To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 7:46 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager Michael Madigan wrote: Confucius said

RE: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

] On Behalf Of Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox) Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:55 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager __stephen needs to print this out and tape it to his keyboard. I am off to look for one for to and too for him. Are you listening, Stevie-Boy

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

Oh, I count __stephen as a buddy, too. He was a key dude on a ProFox rogue splinter group we fomented, and we'd convene at the GL conference. If he wasn't a great, smart guy I wouldn't feel license to fully bust his chops on to/too, lose/loose and the others. Guys: giving each other shit since

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox) foxh...@information-architecture.com wrote: Oh, I count __stephen as a buddy, too. He was a key dude on a ProFox rogue splinter group we fomented, and we'd convene at the GL conference. If he wasn't a great, smart guy I wouldn't feel

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote: Guys: giving each other shit since 64,297 B.C. -- a motto to live by. --- Because we can. Because we can't help ourselves. K ___ Post Messages

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

On Apr 13, 2012, at 3:18 PM, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox) wrote: Guys: giving each other shit since 64,297 B.C. -- a motto to live by. --- Because we can. Because we can't help ourselves. Men bond by insulting each other, but they don't really mean it.

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

How true. lol A+ jml On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote:        Men bond by insulting each other, but they don't really mean it.        Women bond by complimenting each other, but they don't really mean it, either. -- Ed Leafe

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

From: Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com Men bond by insulting each other, but they don't really mean it. Women bond by complimenting each other, but they don't really mean it, either. QOTW and +1 Malcolm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

Confucius said that about 2500 years ago.   - Original Message - From: Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 4:21 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager On Apr 13, 2012, at 3:18 PM, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

Michael Madigan wrote: Confucius said that about 2500 years ago. From: Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com Men bond by insulting each other, but they don't really mean it. Women bond by complimenting each other, but they don't really mean it, either. Ed said it yesterday. Ed can beat

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

...@yahoo.com wrote: I remember when someone wanted to say goodbye and wrote, chow. From: M Jarvis brewda...@gmail.com To: profox@leafe.com Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 5:36 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager And Stephen was one

RE: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

Maybe it was food time Al -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 11 April 2012 23:52 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager I remember when someone wanted

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

It should be spelled, ciao.   She thought she was so sophisticated, but she was just a moron.    From: Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 10:55 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

El 12/04/12 06:42, Michael Madigan escribió: It should be spelled, ciao. She thought she was so sophisticated, but she was just a moron. Ah! Bene. Arrivedere ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance:

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

sophisticated, but she was just a moron. From: Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 10:55 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager Point being? Michael Oke, II 661-349

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

Some helpful pointers for us all: http://theoatmeal.com/comics/misspelling (Sometimes I suspect The Oatmeal must lurk on ProFox) -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

On 04/12/2012 03:30 PM, Ted Roche wrote: Some helpful pointers for us all: http://theoatmeal.com/comics/misspelling (Sometimes I suspect The Oatmeal must lurk on ProFox) Thanks, Ted, I needed that. LOL Regards, LelandJ ___ Post Messages to:

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

__stephen needs to print this out and tape it to his keyboard. I am off to look for one for to and too for him. Are you listening, Stevie-Boy??? g Ken On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com wrote: Some helpful pointers for us all:

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

The last time I looked, they weren't any cheaper than regular laptops, so I didn't think there really was a point to get one.    From: Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com To: profox@leafe.com Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 7:41 AM Subject: [NF] Chrome OS introduces

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com wrote: Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager http://www.geek.com/articles/news/chrome-os-introduces-aura-window-manager-20120410/ So, a Chromebook running Chrome OS has a browser, a Gmail client, a photo client, Google Docs, a

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

Shockwave also crashes my chrome a lot.   Is that the same thing as flash or are they separate?  From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 12:13 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces

RE: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com wrote: Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager http://www.geek.com/articles/news/chrome-os-introduces-aura-window-man ager-20120410/ So, a Chromebook running Chrome OS has

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Adam Buckland adam.buckl...@apac.co.uk wrote: Hi Mike, I had the same problem and was about to remove chrome from my sons' notebooks when I discovered that if you disable the built in flash unit and download the external plugin...  it works Enter

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote: Loosing belief in chrome more and more. So Chrome is like a loose woman? Or you are? I lose your ideas in your loose grammar g Ken ___ Post Messages to:

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox) foxh...@information-architecture.com wrote: So Chrome is like a loose woman? Or you are? I lose your ideas in your loose grammar g Oh, I think you're fiting a loosing baddle their, my frend. Spellig has leff the internet. And

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, I think you're fiting a loosing baddle their, my frend. Spellig has leff the internet. And Stephen was one of the first casualties. casual is right (rite?). Or is it causal? K

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

And Stephen was one of the first casualties. Tooshay! -- Matt Jarvis Eugene, Oregon USA ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list:

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

There loosing it.   From: Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox) foxh...@information-architecture.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:37 PM

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

Leland and Stephen share a brain.    From: Ted Roche tedro...@gmail.com To: profox@leafe.com Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 5:18 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox) foxh

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

I remember when someone wanted to say goodbye and wrote, chow.   From: M Jarvis brewda...@gmail.com To: profox@leafe.com Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 5:36 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager And Stephen was one of the first

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox) foxh...@information-architecture.com wrote: So Chrome is like a loose woman? Or you are? I lose your ideas in your loose grammarg Oh, I think you're fiting a loosing baddle

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

Spellig has leff the internet. Torie or Aaron? Yes, I know... Ken Dibble www.stic-cil.org ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list:

Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager

. From: M Jarvis brewda...@gmail.com To: profox@leafe.com Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 5:36 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager And Stephen was one of the first casualties. Tooshay! -- Matt Jarvis Eugene, Oregon USA [excessive quoting

Re: [NF] Chrome does another aw Snap

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.comwrote: Are they going for the blue wale status? This seems to be happening more often. 1+ times a week. I see it frequently on an old box with limited memory after watching several flash videos. Usually, exitting chrome

Re: [NF] Chrome does another aw Snap

Maybe those porno sites aren't Chrome friendly.  From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 4:40 PM Subject: [NF] Chrome does another aw Snap Are they going for the blue wale status? This

Re: [NF] Chrome does another aw Snap

I haven't seen aw snap in a very long time.  I have hardly any plugins installed. From: Fred Taylor fbtay...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 4:49 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome does another aw Snap On Mon, Mar 12

Re: [NF] Chrome does another aw Snap

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Fred Taylor fbtay...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.comwrote: Are they going for the blue wale status? This seems to be happening more often. 1+ times a week. I see it frequently on an old box with

Re: [NF] Chrome does another aw Snap

I just installed adblock to see if it causes any aw snap problems.   From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 4:58 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome does another aw Snap On Mon, Mar 12, 2012

Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old

On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:05 +0100, Paul Hill paulroberth...@gmail.com wrote: Can you be sure? That part of Chrome is not open-source. Well either they're lying illegally in this http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/privacy.html, or they're not. Same applies to any software I suppose. --

Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old

On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Jeff Johnson j...@san-dc.com wrote: On Windows, Chrome is definately the fastest.  For me I always keep in the back of my mind the data Chrome and Google are logging for me.  I honestly don't feel comfortable with Chrome or having Google as my home page for that

Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old

Former FF user - Chrome is just so much cleaner and faster than both IE and FF, although recent betas of FF seem a lot quicker and the next IE might surprise with GPU-assisted rendering. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm ___ Post

Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old

On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:34 +0100, Paul Hill paulroberth...@gmail.com wrote: Chrome sends browsing data to Google (I don't know exactly what). It doesn't send data about sites you visit, i.e. normal browsing. If you type a search in the address bar, it talks to whatever search service you

Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old

On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm wrote: On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 07:34 +0100, Paul Hill paulroberth...@gmail.com wrote: Chrome sends browsing data to Google (I don't know exactly what). It doesn't send data about sites you visit, i.e. normal browsing. If you

Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old

and 4 on a matrox ide card. - Original Message - From: Paul Hill paulroberth...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 11:34 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Jeff Johnson j...@san-dc.com wrote

Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old

Stephen, The people who are converting to Chrome, are they former FF users or new people off of the IE stack? I use FF at work and Chrome at home testing it out. I tested out the early releases of Chrome and thought the product was released way too early. This summer I've been spending a

Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Malcolm Greene pro...@bdurham.com wrote: Stephen, The people who are converting to Chrome, are they former FF users or new people off of the IE stack? I use FF at work and Chrome at home testing it out. I tested out the early releases of Chrome and thought

Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old

Some things still don't seem to work on chrome, and some things don't seem to work right on Firefox, so I have all 3. --- On Thu, 9/2/10, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote: From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com Subject: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old To: ProFox Email List

Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old

Government dictating browsers. You can count on government to get it wrong. --- On Thu, 9/2/10, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote: From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Thursday, September

Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old

58% of my website's visitors use IE 21% use Firefox. The 58% are living in Hell and don't know it. --- On Thu, 9/2/10, Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com wrote: From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date

Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old

On 09/02/2010 02:59 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Malcolm Greenepro...@bdurham.com wrote: Stephen, The people who are converting to Chrome, are they former FF users or new people off of the IE stack? I use FF at work and Chrome at home testing it out. I

Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old

On 09/02/2010 07:00 PM, Leland Jackson wrote: On 09/02/2010 02:59 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Malcolm Greenepro...@bdurham.com wrote: Stephen, The people who are converting to Chrome, are they former FF users or new people off of the IE stack? I use FF

Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old

I have been updating my website so I have loaded about 8 browsers and have been using them all. I noticed that several of the mac related sites don't render CSS without being syntactically perfect. That is not what we are talking about here, though. On Windows, Chrome is definately the

Re: [NF] Chrome is 2 years old

Michael Madigan wrote: Some things still don't seem to work on chrome, and some things don't seem to work right on Firefox, so I have all 3. Hi Michael, I might consider that, if IE had a Linux version. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

Re: [NF] Chrome -OS to kill M$ ?

Stephen Russell wrote: http://tinyurl.com/ltcl95 Error 404 -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 ___ Post Messages

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

At 11:21 PM 9/3/2008 -0400, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: Stephen Russell wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:48 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stephen Russell wrote: What's ABMS? I thought Steve would answer you: it's Anything But

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

On Thu, September 4, 2008 1:48 pm, Charlie Coleman wrote: Nah, the MS evangelicals are having meetings all month, trying to figure out a way to save the company. I got the memo (not sure why though, I removed myself from their fanatics list many years ago - I suppose SQL Server screwed things

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:21 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stephen Russell wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:48 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stephen Russell wrote: What's ABMS? I thought Steve would answer you:

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

At 01:02 PM 9/4/2008 -0400, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: On Thu, September 4, 2008 1:48 pm, Charlie Coleman wrote: Nah, the MS evangelicals are having meetings all month, trying to figure out a way to save the company. I got the memo (not sure why though, I removed myself

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Charlie Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 01:02 PM 9/4/2008 -0400, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: On Thu, September 4, 2008 1:48 pm, Charlie Coleman wrote: Nah, the MS evangelicals are having meetings all month, trying to figure out a way to

RE: [NF] Chrome this!

On the install it asks you if you want it to take the details from your other browser, hence, holy shit Stephen, once you've told it that it can take the details from your other browser don't be surprised if it does it :) Adam. PS It still screws up the login page for my corporate online

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On the install it asks you if you want it to take the details from your other browser, hence, holy shit Stephen, once you've told it that it can take the details from your other browser don't be surprised if it does it :)

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

Stephen Russell wrote: For all of you ABMS folks out there have you given your soul to google yet? What's ABMS? Seems like it konows way to much from your system just by it's install. One coworker though it was real cool that not only his bookmarks were snarfed in the install but also his

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Vince Teachout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stephen Russell wrote: For all of you ABMS folks out there have you given your soul to google yet? What's ABMS? Seems like it konows way to much from your system just by it's install. One coworker though it was real

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

Stephen Russell wrote: What's ABMS? I thought Steve would answer you: it's Anything But MicroSoft ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list:

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: Stephen Russell wrote: What's ABMS? I thought Steve would answer you: it's Anything But MicroSoft Thanks! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance:

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

On Sep 3, 2008, at 8:10 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: For all of you ABMS folks out there have you given your soul to google yet? Uh, they aren't targeting IE. They are targeting FF. How does that make it 'ABMS'? Or did you just have an extra-large glass of Kool-Aid this morning?

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Uh, they aren't targeting IE. They are targeting FF. Hmm. What makes you think that? I think they're targeting The Internet. It's Open Source. Uses HTMLKit and portions of Mozilla code. It's supposed to be a better

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

On Sep 3, 2008, at 9:36 AM, Ted Roche wrote: Uh, they aren't targeting IE. They are targeting FF. Hmm. What makes you think that? I think they're targeting The Internet. I see it this way: anyone who might even consider Chrome will have likely already switched to FF. Those

RE: [NF] Chrome this!

, September 03, 2008 10:14 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome this! On Sep 3, 2008, at 8:10 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: For all of you ABMS folks out there have you given your soul to google yet? Uh, they aren't targeting IE. They are targeting FF. How does that make

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's Open Source. Uses HTMLKit and portions of Mozilla code. Doh! I meant WebKit, obviously... -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see it this way: anyone who might even consider Chrome will have likely already switched to FF. Those who are still using IE are much less likely to switch to Chrome. I do wonder if a Windows-only release will attract

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

Ed Leafe wrote: snipped Or did you just have an extra-large glass of Kool-Aid this morning? ROFLMAO!!! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list:

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

Sources said Google has made the move to create and distribute a browser due to worry about what new features in IE8 could do to its search business. These features include privacy changes that could prevent Google from collecting information related to the effectiveness of its ads, quick-linking

RE: [NF] Chrome this!

I use IE most of the time, but I've looked at FF and Chrome. No reason to switch JH -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 9:40 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [NF] Chrome this! On Sep 3

RE: [NF] Chrome this!

I see it this way: anyone who might even consider Chrome will have likely already switched to FF. Those who are still using IE are much less likely to switch to Chrome. Also, Google has actively promoted FF in the past, and are now competing in the same space instead of working with them.

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

Jean Laeremans wrote: Sources said Google has made the move to create and distribute a browser due to worry about what new features in IE8 could do to its search business. These features include privacy changes that could prevent Google from collecting information related to the

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: 18% now...wow.used to be single digitsis M$ worried at all? Think of the recent I'm a Mac; I'm a PC commercial with PC sitting on the throne in his kingly garments. ;-) Why else do you think MS gathered the disbanded IE team together to

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

Paul McNett wrote: MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: 18% now...wow.used to be single digitsis M$ worried at all? Think of the recent I'm a Mac; I'm a PC commercial with PC sitting on the throne in his kingly garments. ;-) Why else do you think MS gathered the

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: Paul McNett wrote: MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: 18% now...wow.used to be single digitsis M$ worried at all? Think of the recent I'm a Mac; I'm a PC commercial with PC sitting on the throne in his kingly garments. ;-)

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

Paul McNett wrote: If they never stopped developing IE then what did they have to show for 5+ years between versions? Oh, yeah, they were dealing with security flaw after security flaw. So it may have only seemed like they were reacting to the increased presence of Firefox, Safari, and

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

Sorry, I am glad I not even waste time on it. Reading Google Chrome's Fine Print Posted by kdawson on Wednesday September 03, @05:03AM from the here-be-tygers dept. Much ink and many electrons are being spilled over Google's Chrome browser (discussed here twice in recent days): from deep

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

William Sanders / EFG wrote: Sorry, I am glad I not even waste time on it. I don't speak lawyer-ese. Displaying what content? What does that mean? They can reproduce my message saying Chrome is cool!? That's what I love about a new tech that has no bearing at all on my day-to-day

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

Vince - I dunno - I don't see the same wording in the online version of the privacy statement over at http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/privacy.html Maybe that author got something else? The keyword I twigged to, on that quote, was 'display', as in to display content in a browser. The way

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

William Sanders / EFG wrote: Vince - I dunno - I don't see the same wording in the online version of the privacy statement over at http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/privacy.html Maybe that author got something else? LOL, after reading the above, I remembered that in Chrome, the

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

Vince - here's some more info: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080903-google-on-chrome-eula-controversy-our-bad-well-change-it.html Regards [Bill] http://www.mondofox.net ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance:

Re: [NF] Chrome this!

William Sanders / EFG wrote: Vince - here's some more info: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080903-google-on-chrome-eula-controversy-our-bad-well-change-it.html So, there you go, then. Are you downloading yours now, even as I type? :-D

  1   2   >