It's more stable when compared to my experience with XPSP2. I log 60+ hours
a week on the same PC running Vista that used to run XP, and Vista doesn't
crash or hang nearly as often.
I pretty much never have my XP or W2K boxes crash unless I have driver
or overheating problems. Are you doing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.theregister.com/2007/02/14/pricey_beta_bugger/
I don't know about the rest of what he says, not having tried it yet, but:
Aero looks nearly as good as KDE, although it demands about three
times the system resources.
That's a ridiculous statement.
http://www.theregister.com/2007/02/14/pricey_beta_bugger/
I don't know about the rest of what he says, not having tried it yet, but:
FWIW, I tried it for about 20min in a virtual machine, and I think he
was pretty kind. I hated the blasted thing. My limited opinion on it
stands that Vista is
Yep, it's pricey - especially in EU compared to US but I suppose that's
what we get for busting their balls on the IE thing. The OEM versions
are way cheaper but limit you to only ever installing it on one PC.
Everyone hated XP when it came out as well, because things had been
moved from where
On Feb 14, 2007, at 12:13 PM, Alan Bourke wrote:
Everyone hated XP when it came out as well, because things had been
moved from where they were in 2000, so that in itself doesn't
bother me.
I'll keep that quote in mind the next time someone says that Linux
will never catch on,
Everyone hated XP when it came out as well, because things had been
moved from where they were in 2000, so that in itself doesn't bother me.
Many people I know are still on W2K due to what MS did with
XP(primarily activation hassles). Vista promises to make even more
hassles. Maybe even worse
Ed Leafe wrote:
I'll keep that quote in mind the next time someone says that Linux
will never catch on, since things aren't in exactly the same place as
what they're used to in Windows.
That's probably the least of the hurdles facing it on the corporate desktop!
Vista will take a LONG time for mainstream adoption, just as Windows
XP did, but I think it'll be even longer this time.
I think you're right, as there is much less of a compelling reason to go
from XP SP2 to Vista than there was from 2k to XP.
I was thinking that when I wrote this
I'll keep that quote in mind the next time someone says that Linux
will never catch on, since things aren't in exactly the same place as
what they're used to in Windows.
That's probably the least of the hurdles facing it on the corporate desktop!
The #1 reason, obviously being that
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be
On Feb 14, 2007, at 12:13 PM, Alan Bourke wrote:
Everyone hated XP when it came out as well, because things had been
moved from where they were in 2000, so that in itself
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be
Everyone hated XP when it came out as well, because things had been
moved from where they were in 2000, so that in itself doesn't bother me.
Many people I know are still
Derek Kalweit wrote:
I'll keep that quote in mind the next time someone says that Linux
will never catch on, since things aren't in exactly the same place as
what they're used to in Windows.
That's probably the least of the hurdles facing it on the corporate desktop!
The #1 reason,
those apps.
Gil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Derek Kalweit
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be
Vista will take a LONG time for mainstream adoption
I was thinking that when I wrote this comment, but it's hard for me to
think of any specific reasons XP is better than W2K... Only a few
ideas come to mind:
o new 'look and feel'/themes
o Easy Alternate IP configuration for NIC's(useful for laptops)
o ClearType fonts
o Better handling
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.theregister.com/2007/02/14/pricey_beta_bugger/
I don't know about the rest of what he says, not having tried it yet, but:
Aero looks nearly as good as KDE, although it demands
Oh, in the Register article Stephen Russell sent to us (see below), did
y'all catch the deal where FireFox can't be made the default browser? Very
clever. M$ allows other browsers to be used (maybe g), but only IE7 can
be the default? Talk about slicing hairs... Technically compliant with
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Derek Kalweit
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be
I was thinking that when I wrote this comment, but it's hard for me
I've been using LogMeIn for a while now with both free and Pro accounts
in addition to TS, VNC and pcAW. If you need remote printing and file
transfer, you need the Pro license. Highly recommended although I do
prefer pcAW for it's file transfer. Except when it gives me agita...
mrgmhale
I agree with all except the multiple monitors, I have multiple monitors on
Win2K - no problem. If you have trouble, it is probably due to the driver.
You may be able to get an upgrade.
Maybe we need a list of reasons for not upgrading:
1. don't have to worry about being forced to load IE7 with
Far superior to the alternatives, in practice, I've
found. UltraVNC is more likely to crash my host computer and performs
poorly over slow links
Check out LogMeIn.com, with their free version. I finally let guilt get the
best of me and licesned 5 Pro versions, but I still have almost 30
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, there's our first look at Vista. It does benefit from a lot of good
ideas, many of them Apple's, of course, but good nevertheless. It simply
doesn't work very well, unfortunately. There are serious problems with
execution; it's not polished; it's not ready. It
Ah-- just remembered the #1 reason to go to WINXP Pro from
W2K Pro-- Remote Desktop. Far superior to the alternatives,
in practice, I've found. UltraVNC is more likely to crash my
host computer and performs poorly over slow links
FWIW, I'm using UltraVNC just about daily, including it's
mrgmhale wrote:
snipped
Now, if M$ were to do as the Blu-Ray (and in decades past VHS vs BetaMax)
folks are supposedly doing, and
try to edge into the benefits of Vista to the porn industry
What advantage would the porn industry have with Vista???!?
--
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software
Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
Oh, in the Register article Stephen Russell sent to us (see below), did
y'all catch the deal where FireFox can't be made the default browser? Very
clever. M$ allows other browsers to be used (maybe g), but only IE7 can
be the default? Talk about slicing hairs...
For what it's worth, you *can* make FireFox the default browser in Vista.
Back in the day, I bought my first Pentium computer (60 Mhz, with 32MB of
RAM and a 10GB hard drive --- I thought I'd never need to buy a new computer
again). It had Windows 95 preinstalled on it. After using it for two
I agree with all except the multiple monitors, I have multiple monitors on
Win2K - no problem. If you have trouble, it is probably due to the driver.
You may be able to get an upgrade.
I haven't tried multiple monitors on W2K, so it's probably better now,
yes. I tried to load a 3rd monitor the
Ah-- just remembered the #1 reason to go to WINXP Pro from
W2K Pro-- Remote Desktop. Far superior to the alternatives,
in practice, I've found. UltraVNC is more likely to crash my
host computer and performs poorly over slow links
FWIW, I'm using UltraVNC just about daily, including it's
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be
Oh, in the Register article Stephen Russell sent to us (see below), did
y'all catch the deal where FireFox can't be made the default
browser? Very
clever. M$ allows other browsers to be used (maybe g), but
only IE7 can
FWIW, I'm using UltraVNC just about daily, including it's file
transfer and chat, for at least a month now. I love it - and
especially so because I have no expection they are going to change
policy and start charging for it.
I use UltraVNC daily. It crashes my one machine sometimes,
in
there quietly to drive Vista they would whore themsleves to do so G...
Gil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MB Software Solutions
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 2:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up
, 2007 2:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up to be
For what it's worth, you *can* make FireFox the default browser in Vista.
Back in the day, I bought my first Pentium computer (60 Mhz, with 32MB of
RAM and a 10GB hard drive --- I thought I'd never need
trouble down the road. Well, will have to take it a machine at a time,
and maybe try Remote Desktop again (with a simpler cable
modem-router-PC setup) when/if I do run into trouble with UltraVNC on
some other machine.
A modem-router-router-PC setup should work as long as the outside
router
Not knowing your environment, version of PCA, etc., I can't say why you are
having such issues. I am running versions on some client PCs as hosts as
far back as v-8.0, most are now 10.5-12.5. Yet all work fine with my VPN
connections on several of my PCs. I am running v-10 - v-12.5 on my
my first Pentium computer (60 Mhz, with 32MB of RAM and a 10GB hard drive
Actually, I think it was an 850MB hard drive.
A HUGE increase over the computer it replaced (which had a 10MB hard drive).
Ten megabytes --- I thought I'd *never* run out of disk space on that
thing... :)
trouble down the road. Well, will have to take it a machine at a
time,
and maybe try Remote Desktop again (with a simpler cable
modem-router-PC setup) when/if I do run into trouble with UltraVNC
modem-router-on some other machine.
A modem-router-router-PC setup should work as long
mrgmhale wrote:
snipped
Hmmm, I thought this was a new OS from the ground, devoid of DOS (like XP
2000,
eh?), yet the browser seems awfully tied to the OS again... I smell a long
dead fish around here.
Thoughts? Clarifications? Corrections? Am I being paranoid?
It can't be
Pro licenses I have I have not yet used their file transfer
solution.
Gil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Derek Kalweit
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 3:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up
been put in place
to protect you from errors the average user would trip over.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Derek Kalweit
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Vista, all it's CRAPPED up
Check out LogMeIn.com, with their free version. I finally let guilt get
the
best of me and licesned 5 Pro versions, but I still have almost 30 PCs
running the free version on my account. And, for the record, as slick as
LogMeIn is, I still far prefer pcAnyWhere over Remote Desktop, VNC and
39 matches
Mail list logo