Robert Ritchey schrieb:
>
> Hi,
> Sorry, poorly worded question. How can I set the defaults so that when I
> do a new PCB I always get what I want on these instead of 20mils as
> seems to be the hard-coded default. I would like to be able to go through
> everything for a new PCB, set what I wan
>It's probably an auto-generated case number from some web help desk
>software.
That's exactly what it is. They use these tracking numbers with messages as
part of their Quality Control requirements.
Regards,
M. Usman Ilyas
Design Engineer (Systems)
Communications
I would consider the PLD section of PROTEL a dead design tool.
I would either use the free wincupl or go to a commercial compiler from one
of the big boys.
Mike
Using altera parts and Max plus 2
- Original Message -
From: "matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECT
We have a customer who are using Protel 99se (sp6) . We are doing a
complex RF design for this company which includes a small CPLD . They've
selected a specific CPLD from Atmel due to lots of other parameters , and we
have to live with the customer's choice (not under our control -besides it
s
I've tried VMware a year ago and it seemed very slow. Then Win4Lin
http://www.netraverse.com/products/win4lin30/index.php
came out and I've used Protel on Win4Lin 1.0 through Win4Lin 4.0.
It seems to run faster and more stable then on native windows.
Even though I would love to see Protel for
Oh, we (Switzerland and Europe) passed a law that the ISPs have to archive
all emails of all users for 6 month. Strange, the US refused to do that,
since they have their echelon system that filters all emails in realtime.
Both believe it helps them.
Rene
Bagotronix Tech Support wrote:
>If it is
I hope they didn't use .NET.
Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website: www.bagotronix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Edi Im Hof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel under VMware and Li
If it is, my ISP is not complying with it. I just sent myself an e-mail and
it came back with no ID number attached. Must be something
Techserv-specific.
How do we get the terrorists to start using these numbers in their e-mail?
;-)
Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website: www.bago
I have no idea what it's for... Its a new piece of boilerplate that
Techserv is putting on there. I was just curious if anyone knows what the
purpose is.
At 04:22 PM 6/11/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Is this a guessing game? Or do you really need to know what that number is
>for?
>
>It's too long
At 13:06 11.06.02 -0700, you wrote:
>These guys have EDA tools that run on Linux.
>http://www.intercept.com/
>
>I realize its easier for a Unix code base to be ported to Linux, so I'm not
>thinking Protel is going to go to Linux anytime soon. Although it seems
>Kylix could be a plausible platfor
A guess :
A worldwide unique number to identify every email ever written ?
Fighting terrorism too ?
Rene
* Tracking #: C1CA3133D39A7F48A9122838E1496EA547D7D540
*
Is this a guessing game? Or do you really need to know what that number is
for?
It's too long to be a UPS tracking # or for any other courier I have heard
of.
It's probably an auto-generated case number from some web help desk
software.
Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website: www.
These guys have EDA tools that run on Linux.
http://www.intercept.com/
I realize its easier for a Unix code base to be ported to Linux, so I'm not
thinking Protel is going to go to Linux anytime soon. Although it seems
Kylix could be a plausible platform to get onto Linux, since they are using
Any hints? Before you get a bunch of stupid or smart-ass responses, I barely
held on to my quick retorts.
Sincerely,
Brad Velander.
Lead PCB Designer
Norsat International Inc.
Microwave Products
Tel (604) 292-9089 (direct line)
Fax (604) 292-9010
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.norsat.com
Anyone know what this is down below here?
VVV
* Tracking #: 34D725219A6A3746910EE9F3002C1F2227892ABC
*
* * * * * * * * * * *
Matt Daggett wrote:
> Has anyone had any issues running Protel under VMware?
>
> I am getting ready to migrate my machine from native Win2K to Linux and use
> Win2k under VMware for my windows applications. So far the Virtual machine
> is showing only a 10-15% hit on the CPU performance and abou
>It is a female
>by nature and has mood swings to boot.
!
Vive la difference!
Think of autorouters as as job security
-Brian
* Tracking #: 19A89E2E4577644A85AD72E9AF83E5AB58E45961
*
***
Andy,
I have run into this time and time again and also do 12 layer
boards(8 signal and 4 power etal). The auto router is very tough to figure
out because it does not obey the constraints I place on it. It is a female
by nature and has mood swings to boot.
I have found out that I h
At 06:35 AM 6/11/2002 -0700, Robert Ritchey wrote:
>Hi,
>Sorry, poorly worded question. How can I set the defaults so that when I
>do a new PCB I always get what I want on these instead of 20mils as
>seems to be the hard-coded default.
If you find out, let me know! By the way, I think the defaul
... doesn't crash, just stops:
On a fairly dense PCB, set up for 14 layers (8 signal, 6 power/ground) on a
5/5 design rule, I'm seeing strange router behaviour.
The router happily goes through the SMD fanout, memory & pattern routers but
part way through the push 'n' shove pass it does a DRC and
> it. So, as a result of my ripping off OrCAD schematic, over $15,000
dollars
> was spent with them (also bought the PLD package). My advice to Protel -
> Make the schematic module non-copy protected, and wait a few years for the
> money to come back in!
Yes, and I'm quite sure that if the BSA pi
Hi,
Sorry, poorly worded question. How can I set the defaults so that when I
do a new PCB I always get what I want on these instead of 20mils as
seems to be the hard-coded default. I would like to be able to go through
everything for a new PCB, set what I want as default and always have that
com
Ivan,
I agree totally. I 'ripped off' a copy of the OrCAD schematic software from
university (about 10 years ago - it was the DOS SDT III package). OrCAD, in
their (now long gone!) wisdom, while dongle protecting the PCB module,
didn't protect the schematic module. Consequently it was ripped off
23 matches
Mail list logo
