Abd and Hamid
Ok, Protel 99 SE,
I had a little trouble following all of that at first, but actually got in there and
started playing around with the scope of the rule for Power Plane Connect Style, and
while I too had never before investigateed the full list allowed by the slider,
right there at
No problems on XP pro version
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Dom Bragge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 January 2004 23:40
To: Protel EDA Forum
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE on WinXP?
Website Visitor wrote:
Does anyone have any experience running Protel 99SE
Thanks to everyone who responded.
Sat down this morning to test out the various suggestions.
Before doing this I decided to make up the two component footprints and was surprised
to find that I could place them on to a pcb AND place components `under' them without
any problems at all. Wasn't
JaMi Smith wrote:
the ability to apply
the rule directly to a single via, which appears to be the one thing that is not in
the list, although I guess that I could make a seperate via-specification that had a
very very slightly different sized pad, and place it where I wanted the my
no-connect
-Original Message-
From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEDA] Schematic Symbol Import
Is there a way to import Mentor or EDIF schematic symbols
into DXP? I have found schematic symbols on
At 01:58 AM 1/8/2004, JaMi Smith wrote:
It would have been nice to be able to just select a single via,
as it appears that you can do with pads.
There are at least four ways, one of which you noted. As you mentioned, one
can create a via different in diameter or hole size (better the former),
At 01:58 AM 1/8/2004, JaMi Smith wrote:
... and while I too had never before investigateed the full list allowed by
the slider, right there at the bottom is what I am looking for
This is an example of why I consider it quite useful when I make a public
mistake. I'm not entirely dim, at least
John,
Here's the url:
http://e-www.motorola.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=MPC8540
About 3/4 down is a schematics section for part symbols. I'm wondering if
there is a way to import these.
Thanks,
Steve
-Original Message-
From: John A. Ross [Design] [mailto:[EMAIL
The only drawback with this approach is that when selecting components
within the footprint you get the `popup select component dialog' more an
inconvenience than anything else.
Consider it a feature, not an inconvenience (or bug). It's better for
Protel to ask you which object you want,
At 06:46 PM 1/7/2004, you wrote:
I have a PDF (160kb) explaining the format. Let me know if anyone wants me
to email it to them...
I'd like to see it, and to put it up on the filespace for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message:
At 09:29 AM 1/8/2004, you wrote:
Sure, there are a few ways to do this. You have to make a rule for the
plane connect style, then use the query helper to specify the via.
It is this which is not easy to do. I don't see a way to use the query
helper to specify the via. Quite possibly, I'm
Ivan,
2.8 has that option also. Under Options preferences unclick Nearest
component and it will list the possibles.
Regards,
Jim McGrath
CAD Connections, Inc.
Bagotronix Tech Support wrote:
The only drawback with this approach is that when selecting components
within the footprint you get
Steve
I already found it from your post in the DXP list.
I have tried to open these files and export a Orcad library for you but
I keep getting an error on export. The orcad librray you could open in
DXP.
I have asked my colleague in Spain who uses Board Architect if he can
open the Mentor
Thanks to all that responded, I received the information I needed about the
ASCII format
Thank you
Mike Reagan
-Original Message-
From: JaMi Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 6:01 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Cc: JaMi Smith
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel PCB
2.8 has that option also. Under Options preferences unclick Nearest
component and it will list the possibles.
Wow, someone else who remembers 2.8 better than I do. Hot dawg!
I still keep 2.8 around for the occasional PCB that needs to be manually
optimized for parts placement and routing on
Rob,
InRegionRelative and InRegionAbsolute, as well as inVia, appear to be on the road to
what I need, but I could not find anyhting like that that deals with Region when I
was playing around with the Query Helper last night.
It appears that these are part of a much larger Query Language that I
Yes,
I've been running it now for over a year with nothing more than
the usual hiccups. I've also been using it with SP6, so I don't know if
that is a requirement for XP use or not.
Dan Enslen
The only reason time exists is so
everything doesn't happen all at once.
-Original
Good comments and pretty much the workaround I've decided I'm forced to accept. I
really find it hugely stupid that the two processes are disconnected and that such a
problem would be allowed to exist. It leads me to distrust other output processes.
There is even a selection in the print
- Original Message -
From: Abd ulRahman Lomax [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] [dxp] Controll Connection to Plane by Area
. . .
These are all more complex than simply setting a rule for all vias to be
Mr. Lomax wrote:
It's self-documenting, as you will see if you open it with, say, Word. The
field separator is | if you want to take it into Excel.
Very wordy, but very convenient.
There are some obscure fields, perhaps somewhere there is fuller
documentation. But most and probably all of what
I know this is ancient history to most but I do need this occasionally.
Does anyone know a trick to make Client 3.2 run on Win2K reliably. It fails
2 out of 3 times to initialize. I cannot kill it, it takes down WOW and I
have
to re-boot. A logout and log back in does not work. I have the
Hi Rob,
Yes, I try and have same problem. So I am using Window XP.
lynh
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ritchey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 9:31 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Client 3.2 Under Win2K?
I know this is ancient history to most
It maybe would work better on win me or win 98se than on any later operating
system.
Maybe try a dual boot system.
BR
Linh Pham [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/01/2004 06:21:04 AM
Please respond to Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Protel EDA Forum' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc:
I had was running Client 3.2 before I upgraded to Protel 99SE with Win NT.
The only thing I remember is to right click on the Icon for Protel and click run under
a separate memory space. As long as I had run under a separate memory space checked
Protel ran without problems. I am not saying it
24 matches
Mail list logo
